Long-Term Outcome on the Mal-Seating of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Articulation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Midterm Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Delta Ceramic Liner with a Titanium Taper Locking Band

Backgroud

This retrospective midterm study aimed to analyze seating properties, fracture types, noisy hips, and survivorship of a delta ceramic liner with a titanium taper locking band.

Methods

A total of 451 patients (538 hips) underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty using the same design delta ceramic liner. Patients' clinical functions were evaluated using Harris Hip score, and the radiological migration or loosening of cementless cups was recorded. Component survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis, with failure defined as revision of any component or ceramic bearing for any reason. The worst-case survival scenario for noisy hip revision recommendations was estimated.

Results

A total of 475 patients (514 hips) were evaluated with an average follow-up of 9.5 years (range, 5-13.9 years). One hip (0.19%) had intraoperative asymmetric seating. No hips had loosening, osteolysis, wear, or delta ceramic liner or head fracture. Three patients (0.58%) reported reproducible squeaking. Two cups were revised due to recurrent dislocation, 2 femoral stems were revised for periprosthetic fractures, and 1 hip was treated for deep periprosthetic joint infection. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed a 10-year cup survival rate of 97.8% (95% CI, 95.2%-99.9%), with any revision as the endpoint. The worst-case scenario showed a 10-year survival rate of 96.4% (95% CI, 94.2%-99.2%).

Conclusions

The Delta ceramic liner with a titanium locking band on the mutlibearing cementless cup offered secure intraoperative seating properties with fewer ceramic-related complications at the midterm follow-up.

A Very Rare Form of Ceramic Head Fracture in Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Unique Experience and Literature Review

Introduction

A fracture of the ceramic head in bipolar hemiarthroplasty using an inner polyliner has not been reported yet, and there seems to be no report of simultaneous breakage of the fourth-generation BIOLOX Delta ceramic head and liner in total hip arthroplasty.

Method

A 44-year-old male patient underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a third-generation BIOLOX Forte ceramic head 3 years and 9 months earlier for osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) and visited our hospital due to a ceramic head fracture. Conversion total hip arthroplasty was performed. A 64-year-old female patient underwent total hip arthroplasty using a fourth-generation BIOLOX Delta ceramic head and liner articulation for osteoarthritis of the hip. The ceramic head and liner were fractured during the third dislocation. Ceramic head and liner exchange revision surgery was performed.

Conclusion

When using ceramic bearings, fractures or delamination following trauma can occur, confirming the need to carefully evaluate the condition of the ceramic components in symptomatic patients.

Evaluating the Feasibility and Reproducibility of a Novel Insertion Method for Modular Acetabular Ceramic Liners

Modern hip implants have a modular design. In case of wear or other damage it allows surgeons to change the tribological partners, i.e., the acetabular liner and femoral ball. In both revision and primary surgery, the secure joining of the implant components is important for the success of the operation. The two components, namely the ceramic liner and hip cup, are connected via a conical press connection and should be concentrically aligned to avoid chipping. Malseated liners can reduce the life span in situ. The amount of the joining force, which is usually applied via a hammer, depends on the surgeon. In this study, an alternative joining method for acetabular ceramic liners in hip cups was investigated, which intends to make the process more reproducible and thus safer. For this purpose, a handpiece was used to apply a defined force impulse of 4 kN. For the concentric alignment of a ceramic liner in the hip cup, an adapter was developed based on findings via a qualitative finite element (FE) analysis. Insertion and pushout tests of the acetabular cup-liner connection were performed in the laboratory with the new instrument (handpiece with the connected adapter) to evaluate the functionality of the instrument and the reproducibility of the new insertion method. For comparison, liners and acetabular cups were joined using a testing machine according to the standard. The presented results demonstrate the technical proof-of-concept of the new joining method under laboratory conditions. They meet the acceptance criteria of established manufacturers, which proves the equivalency to proven methods for joining modular implant components. To verify the improvement of the new joining method compared to the conventionally used joining method, an application-oriented study with different surgeons and the new joining instrument under clinical conditions is necessary.

Fracture of a Metal-Backed Ceramic Liner After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common procedure that has become increasingly prevalent in a younger patient population. With improvements in prostheses and materials, the survivorship of implants has increased. Historically, the excellent wear characteristics of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) implants made them an appealing choice compared to other bearing options. Yet, the potential benefits of the bearing longevity related to the wear characteristics have been combated by their unique causes of failure such as implant fracture and squeaking. Metal-backed ceramic liners were developed to minimize impingement-related chipping at the periphery of the implant that may propagate to catastrophic implant fracture. We report a case involving a fracture of a metal-backed ceramic liner that presented with months of pain and crepitus with no overt signs of fracture on imaging.

Comparisons of Different Bearing Surfaces in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to make comparisons of different bearing surfaces in patients after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

The network meta-analysis was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline. The primary outcomes were implant survival and Harris hip score (HHS). Secondary outcomes included linear wear rates and serum level of metal ions. Subgroup analyses were performed by: (1) classifying head sizes as small and large; (2) femoral heads as ceramic and metal; and (3) liners as metal, ceramic, polyethylene, highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXP), or vitamin E-infused highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXPE). A total of 64 eligible RCTs with different bearings were assessed. Overall inconsistency and heterogeneity were acceptable.

RESULTS

In the 10 years follow-up, metal-on-polythene and ceramic-on-polythene bearings with small heads showed higher risk for revisions compared with metal-on-HXP and ceramic-on-HXP bearings with small heads. Similarly, only metal or ceramic-on-polythene bearings with small heads showed inferiority in HHS compared with other bearings. Conventional polyethylene liners showed higher linear wear rates compared with HXP, HXPE, and ceramic liners at 5 and 10 years after surgery, while metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-metal bearings showed higher serum level of cobalt and chromium.

CONCLUSION

Bearings containing HXP, HXPE, and ceramic liners showed comparable survivorship and hip function at follow-up of 5 and 10 years. Hard-on-hard bearings containing metal had higher serum level of metal ions than others. Bearings containing conventional polyethylene had worse performance in terms of implant survival, hip function, and wear rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Clinical Outcomes, Metal Ion Levels, Lymphocyte Profiles, and Implant Survival Following Five Different Bearings of Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Mean 10-year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

Different bearings have been used in total hip arthroplasty (THA), but the long-term performance is still controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there are differences when comparing THAs with 5 different bearings at a long-term follow-up of more than 10 years.

METHODS

From January 2010 to May 2012, 101 THA patients (134 hips) were divided into metal-on-metal group (MoM, 31 hips), metal-on-polyethylene group (MoP, 23 hips), ceramic-on-metal group (CoM, 21 hips), ceramic-on-ceramic group (CoC, 33 hips), and ceramic-on-polyethylene group (CoP, 26 hips). The mean follow-up period was 10.3 years. The Harris hip score (HSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores (WOMAC), range of motion (ROM), blood cell count, and liver-kidney function were measured. Serum and urine metal ion levels were measured using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and a blood lymphocytes analysis was counted by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

No difference was observed in the HSS, WOMAC, ROM, blood cell count, or liver-kidney function among any of the 5 groups. Metal ion levels were significantly elevated in metal-containing bearings. Flow cytometry showed that no differences were found. Revision was performed due to pseudotumor in 3 patients. The implant survival rate was 96.7% and 93.3% for the MoM and CoC groups, which was significantly lower compared with other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Metal ion levels were elevated significantly in metal-containing bearings, especially in MoM THA patients. The implant survival rate was significantly lower in CoC and MoM THAs, which was mainly due to pseudotumor formation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II.