Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence Model for Assessment of Hip Dislocation Risk Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty From Postoperative Radiographs

Are artificial intelligence generated lower extremity radiographic measurements accurate in a cohort with implants?

OBJECTIVE

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) and malalignment of the lower extremity can lead to pain and increased risk of osteoarthritis. Radiographic measurements on anteroposterior (AP) full-length radiographs can be used to assess LLD and lower extremity alignment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI software in performing lower extremity radiographic measurements in patients with implants. The secondary aim was to compare its efficiency to that of radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study used the following eight angles and five lengths: hip-knee-angle (HKA), anatomical-tibiofemoral angle (aTFA), anatomical-mechanical-axis angle (AMA), joint-line-convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical-lateral-proximal-femur-angle (mLPFA), mechanical-lateral-distal-femur-angle (mLDFA), mechanical-medial-proximal-tibia-angle (mMPTA), mechanical-lateral-distal-tibia- angle (mLDTA), femur length, tibia length, full leg length, leg-length-discrepancy (LLD), and mechanical-axis-deviation (MAD). Two radiologists and AI software independently performed these measurements on 156 legs. The statistical methods used to assess AI performance were intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The AI generated output for 129/156 legs. 11/13 of the variables showed excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.75) between AI and the readers. Bland Altman performance targets were met for 5/13 variables. The mean (standard deviation) reading time for the AI and two readers, respectively, was 38 (6) seconds, 181 (41) seconds, and 214 (77) seconds.

CONCLUSION

In a cohort with lower extremity metal implants, AI-based leg length measurements were fast and accurate although most angular measurements were not.

Comparison of an AI-driven planning tool and manual radiographic measurements in total knee arthroplasty

Background

Accurate preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential. Traditional manual radiographic planning can be time-consuming and potentially prone to inaccuracies. This study investigates the performance of an AI-based radiographic planning tool in comparison with manual measurements in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty, using a retrospective observational design to assess reliability and efficiency.

Methods

We retrospectively compared the Autoplan tool integrated within the mediCAD software (mediCAD Hectec GmbH, Altdorf, Germany), routinely implemented in our institutional workflow, to manual measurements performed by two orthopedic specialists on pre- and postoperative radiographs of 100 patients who underwent elective TKA. The following parameters were measured: leg length, mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle (mLPFA), anatomical mechanical angle (AMA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), and mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA).Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to assess measurement reliability, and the time required for each method was recorded.

Results

The Autoplan tool demonstrated high reliability (ICC > 0.90) compared with manual measurements for linear parameters (e.g., leg length and MAD). However, the angular measurements of mLPFA, JLCA, and AMA exhibited poor reliability (ICC < 0.50) among all raters. The Autoplan tool significantly reduced the time required for measurements compared to manual measurements, with a mean time saving of 44.3 seconds per case (95 % CI: 43.5-45.1 seconds, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

AI-assisted tools like the Autoplan tool in mediCAD offer substantial time savings and demonstrate reliable measurements for certain linear parameters in preoperative TKA planning. However, the observed low reliability in some measurements, even amongst experienced human raters, suggests inherent challenges in the radiographic assessment of angular parameters. Further development is needed to improve the accuracy of automated angular measurements, and to address the inherent variability in their assessment.

Deep Learning for Automated Classification of Hip Hardware on Radiographs

PURPOSE

To develop a deep learning model for automated classification of orthopedic hardware on pelvic and hip radiographs, which can be clinically implemented to decrease radiologist workload and improve consistency among radiology reports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pelvic and hip radiographs from 4279 studies in 1073 patients were retrospectively obtained and reviewed by musculoskeletal radiologists. Two convolutional neural networks, EfficientNet-B4 and NFNet-F3, were trained to perform the image classification task into the following most represented categories: no hardware, total hip arthroplasty (THA), hemiarthroplasty, intramedullary nail, femoral neck cannulated screws, dynamic hip screw, lateral blade/plate, THA with additional femoral fixation, and post-infectious hip. Model performance was assessed on an independent test set of 851 studies from 262 patients and compared to individual performance of five subspecialty-trained radiologists using leave-one-out analysis against an aggregate gold standard label.

RESULTS

For multiclass classification, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for NFNet-F3 was 0.99 or greater for all classes, and EfficientNet-B4 0.99 or greater for all classes except post-infectious hip, with an AUC of 0.97. When compared with human observers, models achieved an accuracy of 97%, which is non-inferior to four out of five radiologists and outperformed one radiologist. Cohen's kappa coefficient for both models ranged from 0.96 to 0.97, indicating excellent inter-reader agreement.

CONCLUSION

A deep learning model can be used to classify a range of orthopedic hip hardware with high accuracy and comparable performance to subspecialty-trained radiologists.

The Impact of Leg Length and Offset Change on Dislocation Risk Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue management in total hip arthroplasty includes appropriate restoration and/or alteration of leg length (LL) and offset to re-establish natural hip biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of LL and offset-derived variables in a multivariable survival model for dislocation.

METHODS

Clinical, surgical, and radiographic data was retrospectively acquired for 12,582 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty at a single institution from 1998 to 2018. There were twelve variables derived from preoperative and postoperative radiographs related to LL and offset that were measured using a validated automated algorithm. These measurements, as well as other modifiable and nonmodifiable surgical, clinical, and demographic factors, were used to determine hazard ratios for dislocation risk.

RESULTS

None of the LL or offset variables conferred significant risk or protective benefit for dislocation risk. By contrast, all other variables included in the multivariable model demonstrated a statistically significant effect on dislocation risk with a minimum effect size of 28% (range 0.72 to 1.54) (sex, surgical approach, acetabular liner type, femoral head size, neurologic disease, spine disease, and prior spine surgery).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to traditional teaching and our hypothesis, operative changes in LL and offset did not demonstrate any clinically or statistically significant effect in this large and well-characterized cohort. This does not imply that these variables are not important in individual cases, but rather suggests the overall impact of LL and offset changes is relatively minor for dislocation risk compared to other variables that were found to be highly clinically and statistically significant in this population. These results may also suggest that surgeons do a good job of restoring native LL and offset for patients, which may mitigate their analyzed impact.

DDKG: A Dual Domain Knowledge Guidance strategy for localization and diagnosis of non-displaced femoral neck fractures

X-ray is the primary tool for diagnosing fractures, crucial for determining their type, location, and severity. However, non-displaced femoral neck fractures (ND-FNF) can pose challenges in identification due to subtle cracks and complex anatomical structures. Most deep learning-based methods for diagnosing ND-FNF rely on cropped images, necessitating manual annotation of the hip location, which increases annotation costs. To address this challenge, we propose Dual Domain Knowledge Guidance (DDKG), which harnesses spatial and semantic domain knowledge to guide the model in acquiring robust representations of ND-FNF across the whole X-ray image. Specifically, DDKG comprises two key modules: the Spatial Aware Module (SAM) and the Semantic Coordination Module (SCM). SAM employs limited positional supervision to guide the model in focusing on the hip joint region and reducing background interference. SCM integrates information from radiological reports, utilizes prior knowledge from large language models to extract critical information related to ND-FNF, and guides the model to learn relevant visual representations. During inference, the model only requires the whole X-ray image for accurate diagnosis without additional information. The model was validated on datasets from four different centers, showing consistent accuracy and robustness. Codes and models are available at https://github.com/Yjing07/DDKG.

Deep learning-based object detection algorithms in medical imaging: Systematic review

Over the past decade, Deep Learning (DL) techniques have demonstrated remarkable advancements across various domains, driving their widespread adoption. Particularly in medical image analysis, DL received greater attention for tasks like image segmentation, object detection, and classification. This paper provides an overview of DL-based object recognition in medical images, exploring recent methods and emphasizing different imaging techniques and anatomical applications. Utilizing a meticulous quantitative and qualitative analysis following PRISMA guidelines, we examined publications based on citation rates to explore into the utilization of DL-based object detectors across imaging modalities and anatomical domains. Our findings reveal a consistent rise in the utilization of DL-based object detection models, indicating unexploited potential in medical image analysis. Predominantly within Medicine and Computer Science domains, research in this area is most active in the US, China, and Japan. Notably, DL-based object detection methods have gotten significant interest across diverse medical imaging modalities and anatomical domains. These methods have been applied to a range of techniques including CR scans, pathology images, and endoscopic imaging, showcasing their adaptability. Moreover, diverse anatomical applications, particularly in digital pathology and microscopy, have been explored. The analysis underscores the presence of varied datasets, often with significant discrepancies in size, with a notable percentage being labeled as private or internal, and with prospective studies in this field remaining scarce. Our review of existing trends in DL-based object detection in medical images offers insights for future research directions. The continuous evolution of DL algorithms highlighted in the literature underscores the dynamic nature of this field, emphasizing the need for ongoing research and fitted optimization for specific applications.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies in Advancing Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely performed surgical procedure that has evolved significantly due to advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics. As demand for THA grows, reliable tools are essential to enhance diagnosis, preoperative planning, surgical precision, and postoperative rehabilitation. AI applications in orthopedic surgery offer innovative solutions, including automated hip osteoarthritis (OA) diagnosis, precise implant positioning, and personalized risk stratification, thereby improving patient outcomes. Deep learning models have transformed OA severity grading and implant identification by automating traditionally manual processes with high accuracy. Additionally, AI-powered systems optimize preoperative planning by predicting the hip joint center and identifying complications using multimodal data. Robotic-assisted THA enhances surgical precision with real-time feedback, reducing complications such as dislocations and leg length discrepancies while accelerating recovery. Despite these advancements, barriers such as cost, accessibility, and the steep learning curve for surgeons hinder widespread adoption. Postoperative rehabilitation benefits from technologies like virtual and augmented reality and telemedicine, which enhance patient engagement and adherence. However, limitations, particularly among elderly populations with lower adaptability to technology, underscore the need for user-friendly platforms. To ensure comprehensiveness, a structured literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Keywords included "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "robotics", and "total hip arthroplasty". Inclusion criteria emphasized peer-reviewed studies published in English within the last decade focusing on technological advancements and clinical outcomes. This review evaluates AI and robotics' role in THA, highlighting opportunities and challenges and emphasizing further research and real-world validation to integrate these technologies into clinical practice effectively.

Artificial Intelligence and the State of the Art of Orthopedic Surgery

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, particularly in orthopedics, by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, surgical planning, and personalized treatment. This review explores current applications of AI in orthopedics, focusing on its contributions to diagnostics and surgical procedures. Key methodologies such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), convolutional neural networks (CNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), and ensemble learning have significantly improved diagnostic precision and patient care. For instance, CNN-based models excel in tasks like fracture detection and osteoarthritis grading, achieving high sensitivity and specificity. In surgical contexts, AI enhances procedures through robotic assistance and optimized preoperative planning, aiding in prosthetic sizing and minimizing complications. Additionally, predictive analytics during postoperative care enable tailored rehabilitation programs that improve recovery times. Despite these advancements, challenges such as data standardization and algorithm transparency hinder widespread adoption. Addressing these issues is crucial for maximizing AI's potential in orthopedic practice. This review emphasizes the synergistic relationship between AI and clinical expertise, highlighting opportunities to enhance diagnostics and streamline surgical procedures, ultimately driving patient-centric care.

MedYOLO: A Medical Image Object Detection Framework

Artificial intelligence-enhanced identification of organs, lesions, and other structures in medical imaging is typically done using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) designed to make voxel-accurate segmentations of the region of interest. However, the labels required to train these CNNs are time-consuming to generate and require attention from subject matter experts to ensure quality. For tasks where voxel-level precision is not required, object detection models offer a viable alternative that can reduce annotation effort. Despite this potential application, there are few options for general-purpose object detection frameworks available for 3-D medical imaging. We report on MedYOLO, a 3-D object detection framework using the one-shot detection method of the YOLO family of models and designed for use with medical imaging. We tested this model on four different datasets: BRaTS, LIDC, an abdominal organ Computed tomography (CT) dataset, and an ECG-gated heart CT dataset. We found our models achieve high performance on a diverse range of structures even without hyperparameter tuning, reaching mean average precision (mAP) at intersection over union (IoU) 0.5 of 0.861 on BRaTS, 0.715 on the abdominal CT dataset, and 0.995 on the heart CT dataset. However, the models struggle with some structures, failing to converge on LIDC resulting in a mAP@0.5 of 0.0.

Construction of a Clinical Prediction Model for Complications After Femoral Head Replacement Surgery

Background

While femoral head replacement is widely used with remarkable efficacy, the complexity and diversity of postoperative complications pose a serious prognostic challenge. There is an urgent need to develop a clinical prediction model that can integrate multiple factors and accurately predict the risk of postoperative complications to guide clinical practice and optimize patient management strategies. This study is dedicated to constructing a postoperative complication prediction model based on statistics and machine learning techniques, in order to provide patients with a safer and more effective treatment experience.

Methods

A total of 186 patients who underwent femoral head replacement in the Orthopedic Department of our hospital were collected in this study. Forty-two of the patients had at least one postoperative complication, and 144 had no complications. The preoperative and postoperative data of patients were collected separately and medical history was collected to study the correlation factors affecting the occurrence of postoperative complications in patients and to establish a prediction model.

Results

Possibly relevant factors were included in a one-way logistic regression, which included the patient's gender, age, body mass index, preoperative diagnosis of the mode of injury, osteoporosis or lack thereof, as well as medical history, surgical-related information, and laboratory indices. After analyzing the results, it was concluded that operation time, alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), white blood cell count, serum albumin, and osteoporosis, were the risk factors affecting the development of complications after femoral head replacement in patients (P < 0.2). The data obtained were further included in a multifactorial regression, and the results showed that operation time, AST, white blood cell count, serum albumin, and osteoporosis were independent risk factors for complications after the patients underwent femoral head replacement (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Based on the results of this study, five factors, including duration of surgery, AST, white blood cell count, serum albumin, and osteoporosis, were identified as independent risk factors for complications after patients underwent femoral head replacement. In addition, the prediction model developed in this study has a high scientific and clinical application value, providing clinicians and patients with an important tool for assessing the risk of complications after affected femoral head replacement.

Artificial intelligence in planned orthopaedic care

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into orthopaedic care has gained considerable interest in recent years, evidenced by the growing body of literature boasting wide-ranging applications across the perioperative setting. This includes automated diagnostic imaging, clinical decision-making tools, optimisation of implant design, robotic surgery, and remote patient monitoring. Collectively, these advances propose to enhance patient care and improve system efficiency. Musculoskeletal pathologies represent the most significant contributor to global disability, with roughly 1.71 billion people afflicted, leading to an increasing volume of patients awaiting planned orthopaedic surgeries. This has exerted a considerable strain on healthcare systems globally, compounded by both the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of an ageing population. Subsequently, patients face prolonged waiting times for surgery, with further deterioration and potentially poorer outcomes as a result. Furthermore, incorporating AI technologies into clinical practice could provide a means of addressing current and future service demands. This review aims to present a clear overview of AI applications across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative stages to elucidate its potential to transform planned orthopaedic care.

Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics

Understanding spinopelvic mechanics is important for the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite significant advancements in appreciating spinopelvic balance, numerous challenges remain. It is crucial to recognize the individual variability and postoperative changes in spinopelvic parameters and their consequential impact on prosthetic component positioning to mitigate the risk of dislocation and enhance postoperative outcomes. This review describes the integration of advanced diagnostic approaches, enhanced technology, implant considerations, and surgical planning, all tailored to the unique anatomy and biomechanics of each patient. It underscores the importance of accurately predicting postoperative spinopelvic mechanics, selecting suitable imaging techniques, establishing a consistent nomenclature for spinopelvic stiffness, and considering implant-specific strategies. Furthermore, it highlights the potential of artificial intelligence to personalize care.

Leveraging digital twins for improved orthopaedic evaluation and treatment

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to explore the potential of digital twin technologies in orthopaedics and to evaluate how their integration with artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning (DL) can improve orthopaedic evaluation and treatment. This review addresses key applications of digital twins, including surgical planning, patient-specific outcome prediction, augmented reality-assisted surgery and simulation-based surgical training.

Methods

Existing studies on digital twins in various domains, including engineering, biomedical and orthopaedics are reviewed. We also reviewed advancements in AI and DL relevant to digital twins. We focused on identifying key benefits, challenges and future directions for the implementation of digital twins in orthopaedic practice.

Results

The review highlights that digital twins offer significant potential to revolutionise orthopaedic care by enabling precise surgical planning, real-time outcome prediction and enhanced training. Digital twins can model patient-specific anatomy using advanced imaging techniques and dynamically update with real-time data, providing valuable insights during surgery and postoperative care. However, challenges such as the need for large-scale data sets, technological limitations and integration issues must be addressed to fully realise these benefits.

Conclusion

Digital twins represent a promising frontier in orthopaedic research and practice, with the potential to improve patient outcomes and enhance surgical precision. To enable widespread adoption, future research must focus on overcoming current challenges and further refining the integration of digital twins with AI and DL technologies.

Level of Evidence

Level V.

Reliability assessment of leg length and angular alignment on manual reads versus artificial intelligence-generated lower extremity radiographic measurements

PURPOSE

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) and lower extremity malalignment can lead to pain and osteoarthritis. A variety of radiographic parameters are used to assess LLD and alignment. A 510(k) FDA approved artificial intelligence (AI) software locates landmarks on full leg standing radiographs and performs several measurements. The objective of this study was to assess the reliability of this AI tool compared to three manual readers.

METHODS

A sample of 320 legs was used. Three readers' measurements were compared to AI output for hip-knee-angle (HKA), anatomical-tibiofemoral angle (aTFA), anatomical-mechanical-axis angle (AMA), joint-line-convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical-lateral-proximal-femur-angle (mLPFA), mechanical-lateral-distal-femur-angle (mLDFA), mechanical-medial-proximal-tibia-angle (mMPTA), mechanical-lateral-distal-tibia- angle (mLDTA), femur length, tibia length, full leg length, leg-length-discrepancy (LLD), and mechanical-axis-deviation (MAD). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to track performance.

RESULTS

AI output was successfully produced for 272/320 legs in the study. The reader versus AI pairwise ICCs were mostly in the excellent range: 12/13, 12/13, and 9/13 variables were in the excellent range (ICC > 0.75) for readers 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was better agreement for leg length, femur length, tibia length, LLD, and HKA than for other variables. The median reading times for the three readers and AI were 250, 282, 236, and 38 s, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that AI-based software provides reliable assessment of LLD and lower extremity alignment with substantial time savings.

Bibliometric analysis of machine learning trends and hotspots in arthroplasty literature over 31 years

Background

Artificial intelligence has demonstrated utility in orthopedic research. Algorithmic models derived from machine learning have demonstrated adaptive learning with predictive application towards outcomes, leading to increased traction in the literature. This study aims to identify machine learning arthroplasty research trends and anticipate emerging key terms.

Methods

Published literature focused on machine learning in arthroplasty from 1992 to 2023 was selected through the Web of Science Core Collection of Clarivate Analytics. Following that, bibliometric indicators were attained and brought in to perform an additional examination using Bibliometrix and VOSviewer to identify historical and present patterns within the literature.

Results

A total of 235 documents were obtained through bibliometric sourcing based on machine learning applications within the arthroplasty literature. Thirty-four countries published articles on the topic, and the United States was demonstrated to be the largest global contributor. Four hundred-five institutions internationally contributed articles, with Harvard Medical School and the University of California system as the most relevant institutes, with 75 and 44 articles produced, respectively. Kwon YM was the most productive author, while Haeberle HS and Ramkumar PN were the most impactful based on h-index. The Thematic map and Co-occurrence visualization helped identify both major and niche themes present in the scientific databases.

Conclusions

Machine learning in arthroplasty research continues to gain traction with a growing annual production rate and contributions from international authors and institutions. Institutions and authors based in the United States are the leading contributors to machine learning applications within arthroplasty research. This research discerns trends that have occurred, are presently ongoing, and are emerging within this field, aiming to inform future hotspot development.

THA-Net: A Deep Learning Solution for Next-Generation Templating and Patient-specific Surgical Execution

BACKGROUND

This study introduces THA-Net, a deep learning inpainting algorithm for simulating postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) radiographs from a single preoperative pelvis radiograph input, while being able to generate predictions either unconditionally (algorithm chooses implants) or conditionally (surgeon chooses implants).

METHODS

The THA-Net is a deep learning algorithm which receives an input preoperative radiograph and subsequently replaces the target hip joint with THA implants to generate a synthetic yet realistic postoperative radiograph. We trained THA-Net on 356,305 pairs of radiographs from 14,357 patients from a single institution's total joint registry and evaluated the validity (quality of surgical execution) and realism (ability to differentiate real and synthetic radiographs) of its outputs against both human-based and software-based criteria.

RESULTS

The surgical validity of synthetic postoperative radiographs was significantly higher than their real counterparts (mean difference: 0.8 to 1.1 points on 10-point Likert scale, P < .001), but they were not able to be differentiated in terms of realism in blinded expert review. Synthetic images showed excellent validity and realism when analyzed with already validated deep learning models.

CONCLUSION

We developed a THA next-generation templating tool that can generate synthetic radiographs graded higher on ultimate surgical execution than real radiographs from training data. Further refinement of this tool may potentiate patient-specific surgical planning and enable technologies such as robotics, navigation, and augmented reality (an online demo of THA-Net is available at: https://demo.osail.ai/tha_net).

The Rise of Artificial Intelligence: Implications in Orthopedic Surgery

Artificial intelligence (AI) is slowly making its way into all domains and medicine is no exception. AI is already proving to be a promising tool in the health-care field. With respect to orthopedics, AI is already under use in diagnostics as in fracture and tumor detection, predictive algorithms to predict the mortality risk and duration of hospital stay or complications such as implant loosening and in real-time assessment of post-operative rehabilitation. AI could also be of use in surgical training, utilizing technologies such as virtual reality and augmented reality. However, clinicians should also be aware of the limitations of AI as validation is necessary to avoid errors. This article aims to provide a description of AI and its subfields, its current applications in orthopedics, the limitations, and its future prospects.

Evaluating ChatGPT responses to frequently asked patient questions regarding periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty

Background

Patients access relevant information concerning their orthopaedic surgery resources through multiple information channels before presenting for clinical treatment. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered chatbots have become another source of information for patients. The currently developed AI chat technology ChatGPT (OpenAI LP) is an application for such purposes and it has been rapidly gaining popularity, including for patient education. This study sought to evaluate whether ChatGPT can correctly answer frequently asked questions (FAQ) regarding periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

Methods

Twelve FAQs about PJI after hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from the websites of fifteen international clinical expert centres. ChatGPT was confronted with these questions and its responses were analysed for their accuracy using an evidence-based approach by a multidisciplinary team. Responses were categorised in four groups: (1) Excellent response that did not require additional improvement; (2) Satisfactory responses that required a small amount of improvement; (3) Satisfactory responses that required moderate improvement; and (4) Unsatisfactory responses that required a large amount of improvement.

Results

From the analysis of the responses given by the chatbot, no reply received an 'unsatisfactory' rating; one did not require any correction; and the majority of the responses required low (7 out of 12) or moderate (4 out of 12) clarification. Although a few responses required minimal clarification, the chatbot responses were generally unbiased and evidence-based, even when asked controversial questions.

Conclusions

The AI-chatbot ChatGPT was able to effectively answer the FAQs of patients seeking information around PJI diagnosis and treatment. The given information was also written in a manner that can be assumed to be understandable by patients. The chatbot could be a valuable clinical tool for patient education and understanding around PJI treatment in the future. Further studies should evaluate its use and acceptance by patients with PJI.

Assessing ChatGPT Responses to Common Patient Questions Regarding Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The contemporary patient has access to numerous resources on common orthopaedic procedures before ever presenting for a clinical evaluation. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven chatbots have become mainstream, allowing patients to engage with interfaces that supply convincing, human-like responses to prompts. ChatGPT (OpenAI), a recently developed AI-based chat technology, is one such application that has garnered rapid growth in popularity. Given the likelihood that patients may soon call on this technology for preoperative education, we sought to determine whether ChatGPT could appropriately answer frequently asked questions regarding total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

Ten frequently asked questions regarding total hip arthroplasty were posed to the chatbot during a conversation thread, with no follow-up questions or repetition. Each response was analyzed for accuracy with use of an evidence-based approach. Responses were rated as "excellent response not requiring clarification," "satisfactory requiring minimal clarification," "satisfactory requiring moderate clarification," or "unsatisfactory requiring substantial clarification."

RESULTS

Of the responses given by the chatbot, only 1 received an "unsatisfactory" rating; 2 did not require any correction, and the majority required either minimal (4 of 10) or moderate (3 of 10) clarification. Although several responses required nuanced clarification, the chatbot's responses were generally unbiased and evidence-based, even for controversial topics.

CONCLUSIONS

The chatbot effectively provided evidence-based responses to questions commonly asked by patients prior to THA. The chatbot presented information in a way that most patients would be able to understand. This resource may serve as a valuable clinical tool for patient education and understanding prior to orthopaedic consultation in the future.

Monitoring of blood biochemical markers for periprosthetic joint infection using ensemble machine learning and UMAP embedding

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after total joint arthroplasty. It is important to accurately identify PJI and monitor postoperative blood biochemical marker changes for the appropriate treatment strategy. In this study, we aimed to monitor the postoperative blood biochemical characteristics of PJI by contrasting with non-PJI joint replacement cases to understand how the characteristics change postoperatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 144 cases (52 of PJI and 92 of non-PJI) were reviewed retrospectively and split into development and validation cohorts. After exclusion of 11 cases, a total of 133 (PJI: 50, non-PJI: 83) cases were enrolled finally. An RF classifier was developed to discriminate between PJI and non-PJI cases based on 18 preoperative blood biochemical tests. We evaluated the similarity/dissimilarity between cases based on the RF model and embedded the cases in a two-dimensional space by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP). The RF model developed based on preoperative data was also applied to the same 18 blood biochemical tests at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery to analyze postoperative pathological changes in PJI and non-PJI. A Markov chain model was applied to calculate the transition probabilities between the two clusters after surgery.

RESULTS

PJI and non-PJI were discriminated with the RF classifier with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.778. C-reactive protein, total protein, and blood urea nitrogen were identified as the important factors that discriminates between PJI and non-PJI patients. Two clusters corresponding to the high- and low-risk populations of PJI were identified in the UMAP embedding. The high-risk cluster, which included a high proportion of PJI patients, was characterized by higher CRP and lower hemoglobin. The frequency of postoperative recurrence to the high-risk cluster was higher in PJI than in non-PJI.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was overlap between PJI and non-PJI, we were able to identify subgroups of PJI in the UMAP embedding. The machine-learning-based analytical approach is promising in consecutive monitoring of diseases such as PJI with a low incidence and long-term course.

An Overview of Machine Learning in Orthopedic Surgery: An Educational Paper

The growth of artificial intelligence combined with the collection and storage of large amounts of data in the electronic medical record collection has created an opportunity for orthopedic research and translation into the clinical environment. Machine learning (ML) is a type of artificial intelligence tool well suited for processing the large amount of available data. Specific areas of ML frequently used by orthopedic surgeons performing total joint arthroplasty include tabular data analysis (spreadsheets), medical imaging processing, and natural language processing (extracting concepts from text). Previous studies have discussed models able to identify fractures in radiographs, identify implant type in radiographs, and determine the stage of osteoarthritis based on walking analysis. Despite the growing popularity of ML, there are limitations including its reliance on "good" data, potential for overfitting, long life cycle for creation, and ability to only perform one narrow task. This educational article will further discuss a general overview of ML, discussing these challenges and including examples of successfully published models.

Creating High Fidelity Synthetic Pelvis Radiographs Using Generative Adversarial Networks: Unlocking the Potential of Deep Learning Models Without Patient Privacy Concerns

BACKGROUND

In this work, we applied and validated an artificial intelligence technique known as generative adversarial networks (GANs) to create large volumes of high-fidelity synthetic anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs that can enable deep learning (DL)-based image analyses, while ensuring patient privacy.

METHODS

AP pelvis radiographs with native hips were gathered from an institutional registry between 1998 and 2018. The data was used to train a model to create 512 × 512 pixel synthetic AP pelvis images. The network was trained on 25 million images produced through augmentation. A set of 100 random images (50/50 real/synthetic) was evaluated by 3 orthopaedic surgeons and 2 radiologists to discern real versus synthetic images. Two models (joint localization and segmentation) were trained using synthetic images and tested on real images.

RESULTS

The final model was trained on 37,640 real radiographs (16,782 patients). In a computer assessment of image fidelity, the final model achieved an "excellent" rating. In a blinded review of paired images (1 real, 1 synthetic), orthopaedic surgeon reviewers were unable to correctly identify which image was synthetic (accuracy = 55%, Kappa = 0.11), highlighting synthetic image fidelity. The synthetic and real images showed equivalent performance when they were assessed by established DL models.

CONCLUSION

This work shows the ability to use a DL technique to generate a large volume of high-fidelity synthetic pelvis images not discernible from real imaging by computers or experts. These images can be used for cross-institutional sharing and model pretraining, further advancing the performance of DL models without risk to patient data safety.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A multi-branch network to detect post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty on X-ray images

Background: Postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA) often require revision surgery. X-rays are usually used to detect such complications, but manually identifying the location of the problem and making an accurate assessment can be subjective and time-consuming. Therefore, in this study, we propose a multi-branch network to automatically detect postoperative complications on X-ray images. Methods: We developed a multi-branch network using ResNet as the backbone and two additional branches with a global feature stream and a channel feature stream for extracting features of interest. Additionally, inspired by our domain knowledge, we designed a multi-coefficient class-specific residual attention block to learn the correlations between different complications to improve the performance of the system. Results: Our proposed method achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in detecting multiple complications, with mean average precision (mAP) and F1 scores of 0.346 and 0.429, respectively. The network also showed excellent performance at identifying aseptic loosening, with recall and precision rates of 0.929 and 0.897, respectively. Ablation experiments were conducted on detecting multiple complications and single complications, as well as internal and external datasets, demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed modules. Conclusion: Our deep learning method provides an accurate end-to-end solution for detecting postoperative complications following THA.

Artificial intelligence in orthopaedic surgery

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly growing across many domains, of which the medical field is no exception. AI is an umbrella term defining the practical application of algorithms to generate useful output, without the need of human cognition. Owing to the expanding volume of patient information collected, known as 'big data', AI is showing promise as a useful tool in healthcare research and across all aspects of patient care pathways. Practical applications in orthopaedic surgery include: diagnostics, such as fracture recognition and tumour detection; predictive models of clinical and patient-reported outcome measures, such as calculating mortality rates and length of hospital stay; and real-time rehabilitation monitoring and surgical training. However, clinicians should remain cognizant of AI's limitations, as the development of robust reporting and validation frameworks is of paramount importance to prevent avoidable errors and biases. The aim of this review article is to provide a comprehensive understanding of AI and its subfields, as well as to delineate its existing clinical applications in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, this narrative review expands upon the limitations of AI and future direction.

Body height estimation from automated length measurements on standing long leg radiographs using artificial intelligence

Artificial-intelligence (AI) allows large-scale analyses of long-leg-radiographs (LLRs). We used this technology to derive an update for the classical regression formulae by Trotter and Gleser, which are frequently used to infer stature based on long-bone measurements. We analyzed calibrated, standing LLRs from 4200 participants taken between 2015 and 2020. Automated landmark placement was conducted using the AI-algorithm LAMA™ and the measurements were used to determine femoral, tibial and total leg-length. Linear regression equations were subsequently derived for stature estimation. The estimated regression equations have a shallower slope and larger intercept in males and females (Femur-male: slope = 2.08, intercept = 77.49; Femur-female: slope = 1.9, intercept = 79.81) compared to the formulae previously derived by Trotter and Gleser 1952 (Femur-male: slope = 2.38, intercept = 61.41; Femur-female: slope = 2.47, intercept = 54.13) and Trotter and Gleser 1958 (Femur-male: slope = 2.32, intercept = 65.53). All long-bone measurements showed a high correlation (r ≥ 0.76) with stature. The linear equations we derived tended to overestimate stature in short persons and underestimate stature in tall persons. The differences in slopes and intercepts from those published by Trotter and Gleser (1952, 1958) may result from an ongoing secular increase in stature. Our study illustrates that AI-algorithms are a promising new tool enabling large-scale measurements.

How to Develop and Validate Prediction Models for Orthopedic Outcomes

Prediction models are common in medicine for predicting outcomes such as mortality, complications, or response to treatment. Despite the growing interest in these models in arthroplasty (and orthopaedics in general), few have been adopted in clinical practice. If robustly built and validated, prediction models can be excellent tools to support surgical decision making. In this paper, we provide an overview of the statistical concepts surrounding prediction models and outline practical steps for prediction model development and validation in arthroplasty research. Please visit the followinghttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Yrit23Rkicfor a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning as a viable solution for hip implant failure diagnosis-Review of literature and in vitro case study

The digital health industry is experiencing fast-paced research which can provide digital care programs and technologies to enhance the competence of healthcare delivery. Orthopedic literature also confirms the applicability of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models to medical diagnosis and clinical decision-making. However, implant monitoring after primary surgery often happens with a wellness visit or when a patient complains about it. Neglecting implant design and other technical errors in this scenario, unmonitored circumstances, and lack of post-surgery monitoring may ultimately lead to the implant system's failure and leave us with the only option of high-risk revision surgery. Preventive maintenance seems to be a good choice to identify the onset of an irreversible prosthesis failure. Considering all these aspects for hip implant monitoring, this paper explores existing studies linking ML models and intelligent systems for hip implant diagnosis. This paper explores the feasibility of an alternative continuous monitoring technique for post-surgery implant monitoring backed by an in vitro ML case study. Tribocorrosion and acoustic emission (AE) data are considered based on their efficacy in determining irreversible alteration of implant material to prevent total failures. This study also facilitates the relevance of developing an artificially intelligent implant monitoring methodology that can function with daily patient activities and how it can influence the digital orthopedic diagnosis. AI-based non-invasive hip implant monitoring system enabling point-of-care testing.

Concerns surrounding application of artificial intelligence in hip and knee arthroplasty

Literature surrounding artificial intelligence (AI)-related applications for hip and knee arthroplasty has proliferated. However, meaningful advances that fundamentally transform the practice and delivery of joint arthroplasty are yet to be realized, despite the broad range of applications as we continue to search for meaningful and appropriate use of AI. AI literature in hip and knee arthroplasty between 2018 and 2021 regarding image-based analyses, value-based care, remote patient monitoring, and augmented reality was reviewed. Concerns surrounding meaningful use and appropriate methodological approaches of AI in joint arthroplasty research are summarized. Of the 233 AI-related orthopaedics articles published, 178 (76%) constituted original research, while the rest consisted of editorials or reviews. A total of 52% of original AI-related research concerns hip and knee arthroplasty (n = 92), and a narrative review is described. Three studies were externally validated. Pitfalls surrounding present-day research include conflating vernacular (“AI/machine learning”), repackaging limited registry data, prematurely releasing internally validated prediction models, appraising model architecture instead of inputted data, withholding code, and evaluating studies using antiquated regression-based guidelines. While AI has been applied to a variety of hip and knee arthroplasty applications with limited clinical impact, the future remains promising if the question is meaningful, the methodology is rigorous and transparent, the data are rich, and the model is externally validated. Simple checkpoints for meaningful AI adoption include ensuring applications focus on: administrative support over clinical evaluation and management; necessity of the advanced model; and the novelty of the question being answered.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1292–1303.

Patient-specific Hip Arthroplasty Dislocation Risk Calculator: An Explainable Multimodal Machine Learning-based Approach

PURPOSE

To develop a multimodal machine learning-based pipeline to predict patient-specific risk of dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated 17 073 patients who underwent primary THA between 1998 and 2018. A test set of 1718 patients was held out. A hybrid network of EfficientNet-B4 and Swin-B transformer was developed to classify patients according to 5-year dislocation outcomes from preoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs and clinical characteristics (demographics, comorbidities, and surgical characteristics). The most informative imaging features, extracted by the mentioned model, were selected and concatenated with clinical features. A collection of these features was then used to train a multimodal survival XGBoost model to predict the individualized hazard of dislocation within 5 years. C index was used to evaluate the multimodal survival model on the test set and compare it with another clinical-only model trained only on clinical data. Shapley additive explanation values were used for model explanation.

RESULTS

The study sample had a median age of 65 years (IQR: 18 years; 52.1% [8889] women) with a 5-year dislocation incidence of 2%. On the holdout test set, the clinical-only model achieved a C index of 0.64 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.68). The addition of imaging features boosted multimodal model performance to a C index of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.78; P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Due to its discrimination ability and explainability, this risk calculator can be a potential powerful dislocation risk stratification and THA planning tool.Keywords: Conventional Radiography, Surgery, Skeletal-Appendicular, Hip, Outcomes Analysis, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM) Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

Artificial Intelligence in Modern Orthopaedics: Current and Future Applications

➢

With increasing computing power, artificial intelligence (AI) has gained traction in all aspects of health care delivery. Orthopaedics is no exception because the influence of AI technology has become intricately linked with its advancement as evidenced by increasing interest and research.

➢

This review is written for the orthopaedic surgeon to develop a better understanding of the main clinical applications and potential benefits of AI within their day-to-day practice.

➢

A brief and easy-to-understand foundation for what AI is and the different terminology used within the literature is first provided, followed by a summary of the newest research on AI applications demonstrating increased accuracy and convenience in risk stratification, clinical decision-making support, and robotically assisted surgery.

Deep Learning and Imaging for the Orthopaedic Surgeon: How Machines "Read" Radiographs

➤

In the not-so-distant future, orthopaedic surgeons will be exposed to machines that begin to automatically "read" medical imaging studies using a technology called deep learning.

➤

Deep learning has demonstrated remarkable progress in the analysis of medical imaging across a range of modalities that are commonly used in orthopaedics, including radiographs, computed tomographic scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans.

➤

There is a growing body of evidence showing clinical utility for deep learning in musculoskeletal radiography, as evidenced by studies that use deep learning to achieve an expert or near-expert level of performance for the identification and localization of fractures on radiographs.

➤

Deep learning is currently in the very early stages of entering the clinical setting, involving validation and proof-of-concept studies for automated medical image interpretation.

➤

The success of deep learning in the analysis of medical imaging has been propelling the field forward so rapidly that now is the time for surgeons to pause and understand how this technology works at a conceptual level, before (not after) the technology ends up in front of us and our patients. That is the purpose of this article.

Prediction model for an early revision for dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty

Dislocation is one of the most common complications after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several patient-related risk factors for dislocation have been reported in the previous literature, but only few prediction models for dislocation have been made. Our aim was to build a prediction model for an early (within the first 2 years) revision for dislocation after primary THA using two different statistical methods. The study data constituted of 37 pre- or perioperative variables and postoperative follow-up data of 16 454 primary THAs performed at our institution in 2008-2021. Model I was a traditional logistic regression model and Model II was based on the elastic net method that utilizes machine learning. The models' overall performance was measured using the pseudo R2 values. The discrimination of the models was measured using C-index in Model I and Area Under the Curve (AUC) in Model II. Calibration curves were made for both models. At 2 years postoperatively, 95 hips (0.6% prevalence) had been revised for dislocation. The pseudo R2 values were 0.04 in Model I and 0.02 in Model II indicating low predictive capability in both models. The C-index in Model I was 0.67 and the AUC in Model II was 0.73 indicating modest discrimination. The prediction of an early revision for dislocation after primary THA is difficult even in a large cohort of patients with detailed data available because of the reasonably low prevalence and multifactorial nature of dislocation. Therefore, the risk of dislocation should be kept in mind in every primary THA, whether the patient has predisposing factors for dislocation or not. Further, when conducting a prediction model, sophisticated methods that utilize machine learning may not necessarily offer significant advantage over traditional statistical methods in clinical setup.

Artificial intelligence for image analysis in total hip and total knee arthroplasty : a scoping review

AIMS

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are common orthopaedic procedures requiring postoperative radiographs to confirm implant positioning and identify complications. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based image analysis has the potential to automate this postoperative surveillance. The aim of this study was to prepare a scoping review to investigate how AI is being used in the analysis of radiographs following THA and TKA, and how accurate these tools are.

METHODS

The Embase, MEDLINE, and PubMed libraries were systematically searched to identify relevant articles. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley framework were followed. Study quality was assessed using a modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool. AI performance was reported using either the area under the curve (AUC) or accuracy.

RESULTS

Of the 455 studies identified, only 12 were suitable for inclusion. Nine reported implant identification and three described predicting risk of implant failure. Of the 12, three studies compared AI performance with orthopaedic surgeons. AI-based implant identification achieved AUC 0.992 to 1, and most algorithms reported an accuracy > 90%, using 550 to 320,000 training radiographs. AI prediction of dislocation risk post-THA, determined after five-year follow-up, was satisfactory (AUC 76.67; 8,500 training radiographs). Diagnosis of hip implant loosening was good (accuracy 88.3%; 420 training radiographs) and measurement of postoperative acetabular angles was comparable to humans (mean absolute difference 1.35° to 1.39°). However, 11 of the 12 studies had several methodological limitations introducing a high risk of bias. None of the studies were externally validated.

CONCLUSION

These studies show that AI is promising. While it already has the ability to analyze images with significant precision, there is currently insufficient high-level evidence to support its widespread clinical use. Further research to design robust studies that follow standard reporting guidelines should be encouraged to develop AI models that could be easily translated into real-world conditions. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(8):929-937.

Deep learning model for measurement of shoulder critical angle and acromion index on shoulder radiographs

Background

Several bone morphological parameters, including the anterior acromion morphology, the lateral acromial angle, the coracohumeral interval, the glenoid inclination, the acromion index (AI), and the shoulder critical angle (CSA), have been proposed to impact the development of rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis. This study aimed to develop a deep learning tool to automate the measurement of CSA and AI on anteroposterior shoulder radiographs.

Methods

We used MURA Dataset v1.1, which is a large publicly available musculoskeletal radiograph dataset from the Stanford University School of Medicine. All normal shoulder anteroposterior radiographs were extracted and annotated by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. The annotated images were divided into train (1004), validation (174), and test (93) sets. We use pytorch_segmentation_models for U-Net implementation and PyTorch framework for training the model. The test set was used for final evaluation of the model.

Results

The mean absolute error for CSA and AI between human-performed and machine-performed measurements on the test set with 93 images was 1.68° (95% CI 1.406°-1.979°) and 0.03 (95% CI 0.02 - 0.03), respectively.

Conclusions

A deep learning model can precisely and accurately measure CSA and AI in shoulder anteroposterior radiographs. A tool of this nature makes large-scale research projects feasible and holds promise as a clinical application if integrated with a radiology software program.

Artificial intelligence for distinguishment of hammering sound in total hip arthroplasty

Recent studies have focused on hammering sound analysis during insertion of the cementless stem to decrease complications in total hip arthroplasty. However, the nature of the hammering sound is complex to analyse and varies widely owing to numerous possible variables. Therefore, we performed a preliminary feasibility study that aimed to clarify the accuracy of a prediction model using a machine learning algorithm to identify the final rasping hammering sound recorded during surgery. The hammering sound data of 29 primary THA without complication were assessed. The following definitions were adopted. Undersized rasping: all undersized stem rasping before the rasping of the final stem size, Final size rasping: rasping of the final stem size, Positive example: hammering sound during final size rasping, Negative example A: hammering sound during minimum size stem rasping, Negative example B: hammering sound during all undersized rasping. Three datasets for binary classification were set. Finally, binary classification was analysed in six models for the three datasets. The median values of the ROC-AUC in models A–F among each dataset were dataset a: 0.79, 0.76, 0.83, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.90, dataset B: 0.61, 0.53, 0.67, 0.69, 0.71, and 0.72, dataset C: 0.60, 0.48, 0.57, 0.63, 0.67, and 0.63, respectively. Our study demonstrated that artificial intelligence using machine learning was able to distinguish the final rasping hammering sound from the previous hammering sound with a relatively high degree of accuracy. Future studies are warranted to establish a prediction model using hammering sound analysis with machine learning to prevent complications in THA.

Fully automated deep learning for knee alignment assessment in lower extremity radiographs: a cross-sectional diagnostic study

OBJECTIVES

Accurate assessment of knee alignment and leg length discrepancy is currently measured manually from standing long-leg radiographs (LLR), a process that is both time consuming and poorly reproducible. The aim was to assess the performance of a commercial available AI software by comparing its outputs with manually performed measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The AI was trained on over 15,000 radiographs to measure various clinical angles and lengths from LLRs. We performed a retrospective single-center analysis on 295 LLRs obtained between 2015 and 2020 from male and female patients over 18 years. AI and expert measurements were performed independently. Kellgren-Lawrence score and reading time were assessed. All measurements were compared and non-inferiority, mean-absolute-deviation (sMAD), and intra-class-correlation (ICC) were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 295 LLRs from 284 patients (mean age, 65 years (18; 90); 97 (34.2%) men) were analyzed. The AI model produces outputs on 98.0% of the LLRs. Manually annotations were considered as 100% accurate. For each measurement, its divergence was calculated, resulting in an overall accuracy of 89.2% when comparing the AI outputs to the manually measured. AI vs. mean observer revealed an sMAD between 0.39 and 2.19° for angles and 1.45-5.00 mm for lengths. AI showed good reliability in all lengths and angles (ICC ≥ 0.87). Non-inferiority comparing AI to the mean observer revealed an equivalence-index (γ) between 0.54 and 3.03° for angles and - 0.70-1.95 mm for lengths. On average, AI was 130 s faster than clinicians.

CONCLUSION

Automated measurements of knee alignment and length measurements produced with an AI tool result in reproducible, accurate measures with a time savings compared to manually acquired measurements.

Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence-An Updated Overview

Artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize modern society in all its aspects. Encouraged by the variety and vast amount of data that can be gathered from patients (e.g., medical images, text, and electronic health records), researchers have recently increased their interest in developing AI solutions for clinical care. Moreover, a diverse repertoire of methods can be chosen towards creating performant models for use in medical applications, ranging from disease prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis to opting for the most appropriate treatment for an individual patient. In this respect, the present paper aims to review the advancements reported at the convergence of AI and clinical care. Thus, this work presents AI clinical applications in a comprehensive manner, discussing the recent literature studies classified according to medical specialties. In addition, the challenges and limitations hindering AI integration in the clinical setting are further pointed out.

Artificial intelligence in orthopedic surgery: evolution, current state and future directions

Technological advances continue to evolve at a breath-taking pace. Computer-navigation, robot-assistance and three-dimensional digital planning have become commonplace in many parts of the world. With near exponential advances in computer processing capacity, and the advent, progressive understanding and refinement of software algorithms, medicine and orthopaedic surgery have begun to delve into artificial intelligence (AI) systems. While for some, such applications still seem in the realm of science fiction, these technologies are already in selective clinical use and are likely to soon see wider uptake. The purpose of this structured review was to provide an understandable summary to non-academic orthopaedic surgeons, exploring key definitions and basic development principles of AI technology as it currently stands. To ensure content validity and representativeness, a structured, systematic review was performed following the accepted PRISMA principles. The paper concludes with a forward-look into heralded and potential applications of AI technology in orthopedic surgery.While not intended to be a detailed technical description of the complex processing that underpins AI applications, this work will take a small step forward in demystifying some of the commonly-held misconceptions regarding AI and its potential benefits to patients and surgeons. With evidence-supported broader awareness, we aim to foster an open-mindedness among clinicians toward such technologies in the future.

AI MSK clinical applications: orthopedic implants

Artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning have multiple potential uses in aiding the musculoskeletal radiologist in the radiological evaluation of orthopedic implants. These include identification of implants, characterization of implants according to anatomic type, identification of specific implant models, and evaluation of implants for positioning and complications. In addition, natural language processing (NLP) can aid in the acquisition of clinical information from the medical record that can help with tasks like prepopulating radiology reports. Several proof-of-concept works have been published in the literature describing the application of deep learning toward these various tasks, with performance comparable to that of expert musculoskeletal radiologists. Although much work remains to bring these proof-of-concept algorithms into clinical deployment, AI has tremendous potential toward automating these tasks, thereby augmenting the musculoskeletal radiologist.

Deep Learning for Orthopedic Disease Based on Medical Image Analysis: Present and Future

Since its development, deep learning has been quickly incorporated into the field of medicine and has had a profound impact. Since 2017, many studies applying deep learning-based diagnostics in the field of orthopedics have demonstrated outstanding performance. However, most published papers have focused on disease detection or classification, leaving some unsatisfactory reports in areas such as segmentation and prediction. This review introduces research published in the field of orthopedics classified according to disease from the perspective of orthopedic surgeons, and areas of future research are discussed. This paper provides orthopedic surgeons with an overall understanding of artificial intelligence-based image analysis and the information that medical data should be treated with low prejudice, providing developers and researchers with insight into the real-world context in which clinicians are embracing medical artificial intelligence.