Relevance of the Tibial Slope on Functional Outcomes in ACL-Deficient and ACL Intact Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

The impact of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency severity on the outcomes of fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Anterior cruciate ligament deficiency (ACLD) has traditionally been regarded as a contraindication for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, advancements in surgical techniques and improvements in prosthetic manufacturing have challenged this notion. Controversy persists regarding whether the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) influences the postoperative outcomes of fixed-bearing (FB) UKA. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of varying severities of ACLD on the clinical outcomes of FB-UKA.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 81 patients (87 knees) who underwent FB-UKA for anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA). Patients were categorised into three groups on the basis of preoperative MRI and intraoperative findings: the intact ACL group (31 knees), the partial ACLD group (39 knees), and the complete ACLD group (17 knees). Patient demographics (age, body mass index [BMI]), preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), follow-up duration, and preoperative and last follow-up data, collected more than one year postoperatively, were recorded, including the Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS), Lysholm score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, range of motion (ROM), postoperative X-ray assessment of the position of the femoral component relative to the tibial component, as well as evaluation of radiolucent lines on the postoperative X-rays. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine differences in clinical outcomes, including pre-and postoperative changes, among the three groups. Postoperative complications, such as infection, aseptic loosening, prosthetic dislocation, or periprosthetic fractures requiring revision surgery, were recorded.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of age, BMI, follow-up duration, preoperative HKA, baseline Lysholm score, HSS knee score, VAS score, or ROM (P > 0.05). Postoperatively, all three groups showed significant improvements in the Lysholm score, HSS knee score, VAS score, and ROM (P < 0.001), with no significant differences in the extent of improvement among the groups (P > 0.05). The position of the femoral component relative to the tibial component did not differ significantly among the groups (P > 0.05), and no radiolucent lines were observed in any of the patients. No patients experienced complications such as infection, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fractures, or prosthetic dislocations that required revision surgery at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

FB-UKA is a viable surgical option for the treatment of AMOA. For patients with AMOA and stable anteroposterior knee alignment, ACLD does not adversely affect short- to midterm outcomes following FB-UKA. Even in cases of partial or complete ACLD, careful patient selection and optimised surgical techniques can yield outcomes comparable to those in patients with intact ACLs.

Restoring coronal pre-arthritic alignment in mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: mid- to long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

Previous research suggests that restoring pre-arthritic alignment in fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can improve postoperative knee function. However, its applicability to mobile-bearing UKA remains unclear. This study evaluated whether patients who achieve pre-arthritic alignment following mobile-bearing UKA with the kinematic alignment technique experience superior postoperative knee function compared with those who do not.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 236 knee joints that underwent UKA using kinematic alignment techniques between May 2015 and November 2017. Of these, 222 knee joints met the inclusion criteria for the study. Postoperative outcomes were assessed, with pre-arthritic alignment determined using the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKAA). Postoperative alignment within ± 3° of the aHKAA was classified as pre-arthritic alignment. Patients were categorized into two groups: pre-aligned and non-pre-aligned. Final follow-up occurred in September 2024, and outcome measures included the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales for daily living, sports, and survivorship. Additionally, the percentage of patients meeting the patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) criteria for KOOS-related subscales was recorded. Failure was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Among the 222 knee joints analyzed, the average follow-up time was 8.65 years (range: 7-9 years), with an average implant survival time of 8.48 years and a total knee arthroplasty conversion rate of 2.7%. The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in the pre-arthritically aligned group (99.4%) than in the non-pre-arthritically aligned group (92.5%) (p = 0.012). In total, 169 knees (76.13%) were classified as pre-arthritically aligned, while 53 knees (23.87%) were non-pre-arthritically aligned. postoperative VAS scores significantly improved from 6.90 ± 0.82 to 0.58 ± 0.56 (p < 0.001), and HSS scores increased from 56.3 ± 8.36 to 92.39 ± 4.54 (p < 0.001). Although no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores were observed between groups (p = 0.147), the pre-arthritically aligned group demonstrated significantly higher HSS scores and better KOOS subscale scores for daily living activities, sports, and quality of life than the non-pre-arthritically aligned group (all p < 0.01). The PASS ratio for KOOS subscales also indicated superior outcomes in the pre-arthritically aligned group.

CONCLUSION

Using the kinematic alignment technique for mobile-bearing UKA, knees that achieved pre-arthritic alignment demonstrated superior survivorship and subjective postoperative knee function compared with those that did not.

Fixed-Bearing Lateral Unicompartment Knee Arthroplasty in Degenerative ACL-Deficient and ACL-Intact Knees: A Matched Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees are no longer considered a contra-indication for unicompartment knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who had an ACL-deficient knee who underwent lateral UKA had similar mean 10-year outcomes compared to patients who had an ACL-intact knee and lateral UKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a lateral UKA with ACL deficiency by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2016 were identified. Preoperative magnetic resonance images were utilized to identify a torn or absent ACL in all knees. The absence of an ACL was confirmed during arthroscopy prior to UKA. Patients were matched 1:2 based on age and sex with patients who underwent lateral UKA with an ACL intact knee. The primary patient-reported outcome variable was survival without conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Secondary outcomes included Veterans Rand-12, the Lysholm score, the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score activities of daily living subscale, and Sport subscale. A power analysis showed that 14 patients were needed to identify differences of 10 points on the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score with a power of 80% (P = .05).

RESULTS

The cohort of patients who had an ACL-deficient lateral UKA included 4 men and 12 women (43 to 82 years of age). The matched control group included 32 patients. The mean age of both groups was 67 years (range, 43 to 85). There were 2 patients in the ACL-deficient group who failed. At 10 years, survivorship in the ACL-deficient group was 85%, while survival in the ACL-intact group was 100% (P = .035). At an average follow-up of 11 years (range, 4 to 19.6), there was no difference in outcome scores between ACL-deficient and ACL-intact patients.

CONCLUSION

Fixed-bearing lateral UKA in the ACL-deficient knee resulted in lower survival than patients who had an intact ACL. Patient-reported outcomes were similar in both groups. The ACL-deficient patient who wishes to undergo lateral UKA should be counseled on the lower survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. Retrospective cohort study.

Risk factors for anteroposterior laxity increase over time in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts

PURPOSE

An anteroposterior (AP) laxity can increase over time after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstring tendons; however, the associated risk factors remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of this phenomenon.

METHODS

Overall, 151 patients who underwent ACLR using hamstring autografts were recruited. AP laxity was evaluated using Knee Lax 3 arthrometer at 5 months, 1 and 2 years postsurgery. Patients were categorised into groups I (>1 mm increase) and C (<1 mm increase) based on whether they experienced an irreversible increase in AP laxity after 1 or 2 years compared with 5 months. Patient demographics and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 2 years postsurgery were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Group I (n = 33, 21%) showed a side-to-side difference of 4.6 (3.0-7.2) mm in AP laxity preoperatively and 0.3 (-0.7 to 1.3), 1.1 (0.2-1.9) and 2.4 (1.7-3.2) mm at 5 months, 1 and 2 years postoperatively, while group C (n = 119, 79%) showed 4.3 (2.8-5.7) mm preoperatively and 1.3 (0-1.9), 0.9 (0.1-1.8) and 0.6 (-0.3 to 1.5) mm, respectively. No significant differences were observed in the overall KOOS at 2 years (n.s.). However, group I was older (36 [22-46] vs. 28 [19-39] years; p = 0.044), had longer surgical waiting periods (122 [69-341] vs. 81 [52-136] days; p = 0.041) and lower preoperative Tegner activity scale scores (6 [5-7] vs. 7 [6,7]; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

While 33 patients (21%) experienced AP laxity increase over time, they had comparable clinical outcomes with group C.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: New indications in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient osteoarthritic knee presents a challenging disease entity, which requires careful thought to restore function and enable return to activities. Advancements in technology and surgical techniques have expanded indications for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), to inlcude ACL-deficiency in appropriately-selected patients. An improved understanding of the ACL-deficient osteoarthritic knee can aid in clinical and surgeon decision-making to restore knee function. This review will discuss current practice guidelines for the ACL-deficient knee with single-compartment osteoarthritis, including pathoanatomy, indications, contraindications, technical considerations, and clinical outcomes.

Age under 20 years, pre-operative participation in pivoting sports, and steep posterior tibial slope of more than 12° are risk factors for graft failure after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

Younger age and steep posterior tibial slope (PTS) have been reported as risk factors for graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Few studies have evaluated these risk factors simultaneously in a large cohort of patients undergoing double-bundle ACLR (DB-ACLR). Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to simultaneously investigate known risk factors such as PTS and age in DB-ACLR, determine their thresholds and calculate odds ratios (ORs).

Methods

We investigated 482 knees that underwent DB-ACLR with a follow-up period of at least 2 years. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined cut-off values for age and PTS for graft failure. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the effects of age, sex, height, weight, laterality, surgical waiting period, pre-operative sport type and level, meniscal injury, hyperextension, general joint laxity and PTS on graft failure.

Results

Graft failure was observed in 33 out of 482 knees (6.8%). Notably, the graft failure group was significantly younger (18.0 ± 5.0 years [standard deviation] vs. 30.4 ± 13.1 years, p < 0.01) and had a steeper PTS (11.9 ± 2.3° [standard deviation] vs. 9.6 ± 2.9°, p < 0.01) than the group with no graft failure. The cut-off values were 20.0 years for age (specificity, 64.6%; sensitivity, 87.9% and area under the curve, 0.808) and 12.0° for PTS (specificity, 70.9%; sensitivity, 69.7% and area under the curve, 0.734). Logistic regression analysis identified an age of <20 years (OR = 10.1; p < 0.01), PTS of ≥12° (OR = 5.6; p < 0.01) and pre-operative participation in pivoting sports (OR = 6.0; p < 0.01) as significant risk factors for graft failure.

Conclusion

We identified an age of <20 years, PTS of ≥12° and pre-operative participation in pivoting sports as significant risk factors for graft failure after DB-ACLR.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty improves mental health in patients with single compartment knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative mental health status improves following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with single compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A total of 163 patients underwent UKA [115 (71%) medial, 48 (29%) lateral] (mean age = 65 ± 11) completed preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative veterans RAND 12 item health survey (VR-12) mental component score (MCS). VR-12 MCS was the primary outcome measure. Secondary measures included VR-12 physical component summary score (PCS), knee osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and KOOS patient acceptable symptom state at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The median VR-12 MCS improved from 50.5 [interquartile range (IQR): 43.7-56.8] to 55.0 [IQR: 52.3-57.0] (p < 0.001) at a mean follow-up of 9.5 ± 4 years (range 2-19 years) following UKA. Preoperative VR-12 MCS was significantly correlated with patients postoperative VR-12 PCS (ρ = 0.294, p < 0.01), KOOS pain (ρ = 0.201, p = 0.012), KOOS ADL (ρ = 0.243, p = 0.002) and KOOS quality of life (ρ = 0.233, p < 0.01). Sixty-three (39%) patients improved from low VR-12 MCS (<50) to normal VR-12 MCS (≥50). One hundred forty-two (87%) achieved a normal VR-12 MCS score (≥50) postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

At a mean of 10-year follow-up, patients who underwent UKA for single compartment osteoarthritic knee pain demonstrated significant improvement in mental health scores. UKA resulted in normal mental health in a majority of patients (87%). The resultant improved mental health scores were associated with improved patient pain and activities of daily living.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III retrospective cohort study.

Anterior cruciate ligament injury should not be considered a contraindication for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Finite element analysis

PURPOSE

The research objective of this study is to use finite element analysis to investigate the impact of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury on medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and explore whether patients with ACL injuries can undergo UKA.

METHODS

Based on the morphology of the ACL, models of ACL with diameters ranging from 1 to 10mm are created. Finite element models of UKA include ACL absence and ACLs with different diameters. After creating a complete finite element model and validating it, four different types of loads are applied to the knee joint. Statistical analysis is conducted to assess the stress variations in the knee joint structure.

RESULTS

A total of 11 finite element models of UKA were established. Regarding the stress on the ACL, as the diameter of the ACL increased, when a vertical load of 750N was applied to the femur, combined with an anterior tibial load of 105N, the stress on the ACL increased from 2.61 MPa to 4.62 MPa, representing a 77.05% increase. Regarding the equivalent stress on the polyethylene gasket, a notable high stress change was observed. The stress on the gasket remained between 12.68 MPa and 14.33 MPa in all models. the stress on the gasket demonstrated a decreasing trend. The equivalent stress in the lateral meniscus and lateral femoral cartilage decreases, reducing from the maximum stress of 4.71 MPa to 2.61 MPa, with a mean value of 3.73 MPa. This represents a reduction of 44.72%, and the statistical significance is (P < 0.05). However, under the other three loads, there was no significant statistical significance (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that the integrity of the ACL plays a protective role in performing medial UKA. However, this protective effect is limited when performing medial UKA. When the knee joint only has varying degrees of ACL injury, even ACL rupture, and the remaining structures of the knee joint are intact with anterior-posterior stability in the knee joint, it should not be considered a contraindication for medial UKA.

The Accuracy of a Portable Accelerometer-Based Navigation System for Tibial Alignment Can be Reliable during Total Knee Arthroplasty for Obese Patients

A portable accelerometer-based navigation system can be useful for achieving the target alignment. Tibial registration is based on the medial and lateral malleoli; however, the identification of landmarks may be difficult in obese (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2) patients whose bones are not easily palpable from the body surface. This study compared tibial component alignment achieved using a portable accelerometer-based navigation system (Knee Align 2 [KA2]) in obese and control groups and aimed to validate the accuracy of bone cutting in obese patients. A total of 210 knees that underwent primary total knee arthroplasty using the KA2 system were included. After 1:3 propensity score matching, there were 32 and 96 knees in the BMI >30 group (group O) and BMI ≤30 group (group C), respectively. The absolute deviations of the tibial implant from the intended alignment were evaluated in the coronal plane (hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle and medial proximal tibial angle) and sagittal plane (posterior tibial slope [PTS]). The inlier rate of each cohort, which was defined as tibial component alignment within 2 degrees of the intended alignment, was investigated. In the coronal plane, the absolute deviations of the HKA and MPTA from the intended alignment were 2.2 ± 1.8 degrees and 1.8 ± 1.5 degrees in group C and 1.7 ± 1.5 degrees and 1.7 ± 1.0 degrees in group O (p = 1.26, and p = 0.532). In the sagittal plane, the absolute deviations of the tibial implant were 1.6 ± 1.2 degrees in group C and 1.5 ± 1.1 degrees in group O (p = 0.570). The inlier rate was not significantly different between group C and group O (HKA: 64.6 vs. 71.9%, p = 0.521; MPTA: 67.7 vs. 78.1%, p = 0.372; PTS: 82.2 vs. 77.8%, p = 0.667). The accuracy of tibial bone cutting for the obese group was comparable to that of the control group. An accelerometer-based portable navigation system can be useful when attempting to achieve the target tibial alignment in obese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  Level IV.

Combination of a High Residual Varus and Joint-Line Lowering Strongly Increases the Risk of Early Implant Failure in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Outliers in implant positioning, malalignment, and joint line height change are risk factors for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) failure. However, their relationships and patterns in large datasets remain unexplored. This study assessed medial UKA survival in a large cohort and explored associated risk factors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study on medial UKA patients (2011 to 2019). Radiological outcomes included tibial implant positioning in the coronal plane, posterior tibial slope, residual knee deformity, and joint line restitution. Survival rate at last follow-up was recorded. Multinomial logistic regression analyzed risk factors, incorporating demographic and univariate analysis data.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-six knees met inclusion criteria, with 10 lost to follow-up (2.7%). Mean follow-up was 61.3 months [24.1 to 135.1]. 5- and 10-year implant survival rates were 92% ± 1.6 and 88.4% ± 3.8, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified post-operative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) ≤ 175° (OR = 5.30 [1.64 to 17.13], P = .005) and joint line lowering ≥2 mm (OR = 8.86 [2.06 to 38.06]) as significant risk factors for tibial implant failure. Their combination carried a significantly high risk of failure (OR = 10.3 [3.1 to 34.3]). Post-operative HKA < 175° was common in knees with pre-operative HKA < 172°.

CONCLUSION

This study reports encouraging 5- and 10-year survival outcomes for medial UKA. Tibial loosening was the main reason for revision. Patients with joint line lowering ≥ 2 mm and post-operative HKA ≤ 175° were at high risk of tibial implant failure. Surgeons should carefully restore the joint line in cases of pre-operative HKA < 172°.

The Role of Severe Lateral Facet Patellar Osteoarthritis in Patient Selection for Success of a Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Mean Follow-Up of 10 Years

BACKGROUND

Lateral facet patellar osteoarthritis (LFPOA) has been reported as a contraindication for medial unicompartmental (UKA). The purpose of this paper was to determine if severe LFPOA was related to lower survivorship and patient-reported outcomes following medial UKA.

METHODS

A total of 170 medial UKAs were performed. Severe LFPOA was defined as Outerbridge grade 3 to 4 damage on the lateral facet cartilage surfaces of the patella as noted intraoperatively. There were 122 of 170 patients (72%) who had noLFPOA and 48 of 170 patients (28%) who had had severe LFPOA. A routine patelloplasty was performed in all patients. Patients completed the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Mental Component Score (MCS) and Physical Component Score (PCS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Knee Society Score.

RESULTS

There were 4 patients in the noLFPOA group who required total knee arthroplasty and 2 in the LFPOA group. There was no significant difference in mean survival time: noLFPOA = 17.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 17 to 18] and LFPOA = 18.0 years [95% CI: 17 to 19] (P = .94). At mean follow-up of 10 years, there were no significant differences in knee flexion or extension. Patello-femoral crepitus without pain was noted in 7 patients who had LFPOA and 21 patients who had noLFPOA. There were no significant differences in VR-12 MCS, PCS, KOOS subscales, or Knee Society Score between groups. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was achieved in 80% (90 of 112) for KOOS ADL in the noLFPOA group and 82% (36 of 44) in the LFPOA group (P = .68). PASS was achieved in 82% (92 of 112) for KOOS Sport in the noLFPOA group and 82% (36/44) in the LFPOA group (P = .87).

CONCLUSION

At a mean of 10 years, patients who had LFPOA had equivalent survivorship and functional outcomes to patients who did not have LFPOA. These long-term results suggest that asymptomatic grade 3 or 4 LFPOA is not a contraindication to medial UKA.

No Difference Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis With or Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A functional intact anterior cruciate ligament (ACLI) is considered to be a prerequisite for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, UKA has been shown to have good clinical efficacy in ACL-deficient (ACLD) knees at 3 to 10 years follow-up. Therefore, the role of ACLD in UKA remains controversial, and more evidence is needed to clarify the role of ACLD in UKA.

METHODS

PubMed, the Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central were queried for articles comparing the results of the ACLD and ACLI groups after UKA. Outcomes of interest included the Tegner Activity Scale, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), postoperative slope of the implant (PSI), the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS), the Lysholm score, and revision rate. There were eight studies included. The mean age was 66 years (range 49 to 87 year old) and the mean follow-up time was 6.9 years (range 1.3 to 16.6 years). There was baseline comparability regarding mean age, duration of follow-up, and body mass index (P > .5) between the ACLD and ACLI groups.

RESULTS

The ACLD and ACLI groups had improved postoperative functional indicators, and that postoperative revision rate (mean difference [MD], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 2.04; P = .4), Tegner score (MD, -0.1; 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.05; P = .19), and Lysholm score (95% CI, -2.46 to 7.32; P = .33) were similar between the groups, with no significant differences; however, the ACLD groups had significantly better KOOS Activities of Daily Living scores, with a significant difference (MD, 4.53; 95% CI, 1.75 to 7.3; P = .001). Also, there were no significant differences between two groups in the PSI, OKS, KOOS.

CONCLUSION

ACL deficiency is not always a contraindication for UKA. With correct patient selection, UKA could be considered for medial knee osteoarthritis with ACL deficiency without antero-posterior instability, especially these people over 60 years of age.

Referencing the Tibial Plateau With a Probe Improves the Accuracy of the Posterior Slope in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Background

There is currently no consensus on intraoperative references for determining the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The medial tibial plateau could serve as a direct reference for determining the native PTS through the placement of a hook probe in the anteroposterior direction of the medial tibial plateau. This study aimed to examine the accuracy of this new referencing method.

Methods

We consecutively performed 55 medial UKAs using our new method (study group), and the preoperative and postoperative PTS on lateral knee radiographs were examined. These outcomes were then compared with those of consecutive 50 medial UKAs performed using the conventional method (control group), which immediately preceded the start of the use of the new method.

Results

The correlation coefficient between the preoperative and postoperative PTS of the study group was larger than that of the control group (0.887 and 0.482, respectively). The mean implantation error of the PTS in the study group was smaller than that of the control group (-1.1° ± 1.3° and -3.0° ± 3.2°, respectively; P < .0001). The percentages of knees within 2° of implantation error were 73% and 34% in the study and control groups, respectively (P < .0001). The root mean square errors in the study and control groups were 1.7° and 4.3°, respectively.

Conclusions

The direct referencing method with a probe can significantly improve the accuracy of tibial sagittal alignment.

Anterior Closing-Wedge High Tibial Slope-Correcting Osteotomy Using Patient-Specific Preoperative Planning Software for Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains a challenging problem. Recently, the effect of increased posterior tibial slope has been identified as a risk factor for ACLR failure. In cases with increased posterior tibial slope, an anterior closing wedge, slope-correcting high tibial osteotomy can be used as a robust adjunct to revision ACLR. In this Technical Note, we demonstrate our preferred method for isolated sagittal plane correction following multiple failed ACLRs with an anterior closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy technique using 3-dimensional patient-specific instrumentation. Through correction of the angular deformity and restoration of the defined sagittal slope via the use of advanced 3-dimensional patient-specific instrumentation, this technique fosters an accurate, favorable mechanical environment to prevent recurrent instability of the knee joint.

Isolated Lateral Tibiofemoral Compartment Osteoarthritis: Survivorship and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Lateral Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at Mean 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent option to alleviate disability and restore function in patients with lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of the present study was to determine the survivorship and long-term outcomes in both younger/middle-aged and older patients with lateral compartment OA following non-robotically-assisted, fixed-bearing lateral UKA and to determine if an acceptable symptom state can be achieved.

METHODS

All patients were managed with fixed-bearing lateral UKA by a single surgeon utilizing a lateral parapatellar approach without robotic assistance. The primary outcome variables were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport subscale scores. In addition, the other KOOS subscores, the Lysholm score, the achievement of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and the Veterans RAND (VR-12) Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and Mental Component Summary score (MCS) were collected. Failure was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: younger/middle-aged patients (<60 years of age) and older patients (≥60 years of age).

RESULTS

A cohort of 256 patients underwent medial (n = 193) or lateral (n = 63) UKA. Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. At mean of 10 years (range, 4 to 17 years) of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of any patient-reported outcome measures (p > 0.05). The percentage of patients in whom PASS was achieved on the KOOS ADL and Sport subscores was 82% and 88%, respectively, in the younger cohort and 80% and 80%, respectively, in the older cohort. The mean survival estimate of the prothesis was 15.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5 to 16.2 years) for the entire cohort. The estimated rate of implant survival in the younger cohort was 100% at 5 and 10 years, and the estimated rate of implant survival in the older cohort was 98% at 5 years and 96% at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral fixed-bearing, non-robotic UKA for the treatment of isolated lateral compartment OA resulted in >80% of patients reaching an acceptable symptom state in terms of both activities of daily living and sporting activities. UKA provides an excellent option that provides longevity with high PASS rates and return to activities with a low risk of complications and failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in Medial and Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does the Status of the ACL Impact Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the percentage of patients who reach Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) when comparing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-intact knees following fixed-bearing medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

A consecutive series of 215 knees that underwent UKA (medial = 158, lateral = 57) were included in the study. The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score functional score [KOOS activities of daily living (ADL)] and KOOS Sport were used as the primary outcome variables. A KOOS ADL PASS of 87.5 and KOOS Sport PASS of 43.8 were previously described for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Failure was defined as conversion to TKA.

RESULTS

There were 157 in the ACL-intact group and 58 in the ACL-deficient group. Conversion to TKA was 3.7%. The failure rate in the ACL-deficient group was 5% (3/58) and 3% (5/157) in the ACL-intact group (P = .447). The mean survival for the entire group was 18.1 years (95% confidence interval 17.6-18.6). At 10 years, the survival was 94.3% (standard error = 0.028) in the ACL-deficient group and 97.6% (standard error = 0.014) in the ACL-intact group. At a mean 10 ± 3.5 years, with 93% follow-up, 83% in the ACL-deficient group and 80% in the ACL-intact group reached PASS for KOOS ADL (P = .218). For KOOS Sport, 85% of the ACL-deficient group compared to 81% in the ACL-intact group (P = .374) reached PASS.

CONCLUSION

The ACL-deficient cohort results were not significantly different compared to ACL-intact knees in both medial and lateral compartment UKA. Fixed-bearing medial and lateral UKA resulted in low failure rate and excellent long-term outcomes.

A direct referencing method of the tibial plateau for the posterior tibial slope in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

There is no consensus on intraoperative references for the posterior tibial slope (PTS) in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). An arthroscopic hook probe placed on the medial second quarter of the medial tibial plateau (MTP) in an anteroposterior direction may be used as a direct anatomical reference for the PTS. The purpose of this study is to investigate the availability and accuracy of this method.

METHODS

Marginal osteophyte formation and subchondral depression of the MTP and angles between the bony MTP and the cartilage MTP were retrospectively evaluated using preoperative sagittal MRI of 73 knees undergoing medial UKA. In another 36 knees, intraoperative lateral knee radiographs with the probe placed on the MTP were prospectively taken in addition to the preoperative MRI. Then, angles between the bony MTP and the probe axis and angles between the preoperative bony MTP and the postoperative implant MTP were measured.

RESULTS

Among 73 knees, one knee with grade 4 osteoarthritis had a posterior osteophyte higher than the most prominent point of the cartilage MTP. No subchondral depression affected the direct reference of the MTP. The mean angle between the bony MTP and the cartilage MTP was -0.8° ± 0.7° (-2.6°-1.0°, n = 72), excluding one knee with a "high" osteophyte. The mean angle between the bony MTP and the probe axis on the intraoperative radiograph was -0.6° ± 0.4° (-1.7-0.0, n = 36). The mean angle between the pre- and postoperative MTP was -0.5° ± 1.5° (-2.9°-1.8°). The root-mean-square (RMS) error of these two PTS angles was 1.6° with this method.

CONCLUSION

Cartilage remnants, osteophyte formation and subchondral bone depression do not affect the direct referencing method in almost all knees for which medial UKA is indicated. When the posterior "high" osteophyte of the MTP is noted on preoperative radiography, preoperative MRI or CT scan is recommended to confirm no "high" osteophyte on the medial second quarter. The accuracy of this method seems equal to that of robotic-assisted surgery (the RMS error in previous reports, 1.6°-1.9°).

A radiographic model predicting the status of the anterior cruciate ligament in varus knee with osteoarthritis

Purpose

The study aims to investigate the accuracy of different radiographic signs for predicting functional deficiency of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and test whether the prediction model constructed by integrating multiple radiographic signs can improve the predictive ability.

Methods

A total number of 122 patients from January 1, 2018, to September 1, 2021, were enrolled in this study. Among them, 96 patients were classified as the ACL-functional (ACLF) group, while 26 patients as the ACL-deficient (ACLD) group after the assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the Lachman’s test. Radiographic measurements, including the maximum wear point of the proximal tibia% (MWPPT%), tibial spine sign (TSS), coronal tibiofemoral subluxation (CTFS), hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), mechanical proximal tibial angle (mPTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and posterior tibial slope (PTS) were measured using X-rays and compared between ACLF and ACLD group using univariate analysis. Significant variables (p < 0.05) in univariate analysis were further analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis and a logistic regression model was also constructed by multivariable regression with generalized estimating models. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to determine the cut-off value and the diagnostic accuracy of radiographic measurements and the logistic regression model.

Results

MWPPT% (odds ratio (OR) = 1.383, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.193–1.603, p < 0.001), HKA (OR = 1.326, 95%CI = 1.051–1.673, p = 0.017) and PTS (OR = 1.981, 95%CI = 1.207–3.253, p = 0.007) were shown as predictive indicators of ACLD, while age, sex, side, TSS, CTFS, mPTA and mLDFA were not. A predictive model (risk score = -27.147 + [0.342*MWPPT%] + [0.282*HKA] + [0.684*PTS]) of ACLD using the three significant imaging indicators was constructed through multiple logistic regression analysis. The cut-off values of MWPPT%, HKA, PTS and the predictive model were 52.4% (sensitivity:92.3%; specificity:83.3%), 8.5° (sensitivity: 61.5%; specificity: 77.1%), 9.6° (sensitivity: 69.2%; specificity: 78.2%) and 0.1 (sensitivity: 96.2%; specificity: 79.2%) with the AUC (95%CI) values of 0.906 (0.829–0.983), 0.703 (0.574–0.832), 0.740 (0.621–0.860) and 0.949 (0.912–0.986) in the ROC curve.

Conclusion

MWPPT% (> 52.4%), PTS (> 9.6°), and HKA (> 8.5°) were found to be predictive factors for ACLD, and MWPPT% had the highest sensitivity of the three factors. Therefore, MWPPT% can be used as a screening tool, while the model can be used as a diagnostic tool.

Pre-Arthritic/Kinematic Alignment in Fixed-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Return to Activity at Mean 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

The optimal alignment strategy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is debated. Recent studies have suggested that kinematic alignment may lead to improved biomechanics and outcomes. The aim of the present study was to determine if pre-arthritic/kinematic alignment of knees would result in sustained long-term restoration of function, without conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), following non-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing medial UKA.

METHODS

A total of 236 UKAs were performed from 2000 to 2015. Of these, a total of 150 medial UKAs met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. There were 76 UKAs performed in female patients. The mean age was 65 ± 10 years and the mean body mass index was 28.6 ± 5 kg/m2. Patients with ≥15° of varus alignment preoperatively were excluded. Varus deformity was evaluated with use of the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA). Pre-arthritic/kinematic alignment was estimated with use of an arithmetic HKAA (aHKA, calculated as the medial proximal tibial angle minus the lateral distal femoral angle). We defined pre-arthritic/kinematic alignment as a postoperative HKAA within 3° of the aHKA. The primary outcome measures were the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and Sport subscales, including the percentage of patients who met the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for these measures. Failure was defined as conversion to TKA.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 10 years (range, 4 to 20 years), with a mean survival time estimate of 18.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.8 to 18.8). The rate of conversion to TKA was 3% (5 of 150 UKAs). Postoperatively, 127 (85%) of 150 knees were pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned, and 23 knees (15%) were not. Patients with compared to those without pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned knees had significantly longer mean survival (18.6 years; 95% CI, 18.2 to 19) compared with 15.4 years; 95% CI, 13.4 to 17.5, respectively; p = 0.008) and higher KOOS Activities of Daily Living (92 compared with 74; p < 0.001) and Sport subscale scores (74 compared with 36; p < 0.001). A greater proportion of knees in the pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned cohort met the PASS for the KOOS Activities of Daily Living (85%, 106 of 125 knees) and Sport subscales (109 of 125, 87%) compared with the non-pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned cohort (28% and 57%, respectively; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned knees in this non-robotically assisted fixed-bearing medial UKA cohort had superior outcomes, including the KOOS Activities of Daily Living and Sport subscales and achievement of the PASS for these measures, compared with non-pre-arthritic/kinematically aligned at an average of 10 years after UKA. Knees that fell within 3° of a simple aHKA measurement on a 3-foot (1-m)-long standing radiograph had greater longevity and return to activities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.