Association Between Nonsurgical Weight Loss From Body Mass Index >40 to Body Mass Index <40 and Complications and Readmissions Following Total Hip Arthroplasty

Weight Loss Before Total Hip Arthroplasty Was Not Associated with Decreased Postoperative Risks

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons use body mass index (BMI) cutoffs when offering total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, little is known about who loses weight before THA, and if weight loss improves outcomes. This study determined how many patients lost weight before primary THA, identified predictors of preoperative weight loss, and evaluated whether preoperative weight loss was associated with improved outcomes.

METHODS

Among 53,038 primary THAs that were performed between 2002 and 2019, we identified 2,463 patients who had a BMI of ≥30 kg/m 2 (measured 1 to 24 months before surgery) and had their weight measured at the time of surgery. The mean age was 66 years; 47% were women. The mean BMI was 35 kg/m 2 . Nonparametric models evaluated potential associations with weight loss. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the impact of preoperative weight change on hospital length of stay, discharge disposition, operative time, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), complications, revision, and reoperation. The mean follow-up was 5 years.

RESULTS

Overall, 17% of the patients gained >5 pounds (2.27 kg), 38% maintained their weight, 16% lost 5 to <10 pounds (4.54 kg), 17% lost 10 to <20 pounds (9.07 kg), and 12% lost ≥20 pounds before THA. Only 28% of patients with a preoperative BMI of ≥40 kg/m 2 achieved a BMI of <40 kg/m 2 by the time of surgery; those who did required a mean of 1.3 years to lose the weight. In multivariable analyses, there were no significant improvements in operative time, length of stay, and discharge disposition, or survivorship free of PJI, complication, revision, or reoperation for any weight-loss category when compared with those who maintained their weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 12% of patients lost ≥20 pounds, and only 28% of patients with a BMI of ≥40 kg/m 2 achieved a BMI of <40 kg/m 2 before primary THA. There was no decrease in complications, revisions, or reoperations for any preoperative weight-loss category when compared with those who maintained their weight. While weight loss benefits overall health, the results of this study call into question whether preoperative weight loss alone is enough to reduce postoperative complications for most patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Perioperative management of obese patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty]

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a worldwide growing health crisis, affecting younger and younger age groups and posing new challenges for arthroplasty. Due to increased complication rates in this population, many authors are of the opinion that in patients with a body mass index (BMI) of over 40, the problems outweigh the benefits of surgery and that surgery should be postponed until significant weight reduction has been achieved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) was performed. 49 relevant articles were analyzed. Pre-defined questions were answered based on the literature. The level of evidence for the recommendation was defined in a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

Obese patients with a BMI ≥ 30 have an up to threefold increased perioperative risk, particularly for infections and mechanical complications. In addition, surgery in obese patients is technically demanding, which results in a higher risk of implant malpositioning. Despite these risks, obese patients benefit from surgery in a similar way compared to normal-weight patients, showing comparable improvements in function and quality of life. Preoperative weight loss can reduce the risk but should be long-term to avoid negative metabolic effects. Bariatric surgery and drug therapies can help, but their effects on perioperative risk are unclear. Besides the BMI, careful diagnosis and treatment of comorbidities is crucial.

CONCLUSION

Obese patients benefit from arthroplasty in a similar way to normal-weight patients but have a higher risk of complications, particularly infection. Prior to joint replacement, patients with a BMI of 40 or more should undergo dietary counselling and weight reduction; their metabolic status should be checked, as malnutrition can increase the risk. If weight reduction is not achieved despite these measures, the operation can be performed with increased risks, whereby the patient should be fully informed and involved in the decision-making process.

Effects of elevated body mass index on the success of total knee and total hip arthroplasty: a comprehensive overview

INTRODUCTION

The average body mass index (BMI) in the United States has tripled over the last five decades despite concerted population-based efforts for weight management. Elevated BMI and, in particular, obesity are risk factors for osteoarthritis. This trend has led to increased demands for total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA), necessitating an in-depth understanding of how elevated BMI impacts TKA and THA.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the literature investigating the effects of elevated BMI, primarily obesity, on TKA and THA, focusing on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative considerations. It describes the associated risks, economic implications, and ethical considerations of patients with high BMIs undergoing TKA or THA. To ensure all relevant literature was included, Ovid Medline and Google Scholar databases were searched for the following terms, 'body mass index,' 'obesity,' 'knee,' 'hip,' and 'arthroplasty' for articles published from January 2019 through July 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the challenges of high BMI in TKA and THA, a deeper understanding of obesity as a chronic illness, coupled with advances in surgical techniques, can improve patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach and further research will optimize the care of patients with elevated BMIs undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

Sleeve gastrectomy prior to primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty is associated with increased risk of early complications

Aims

The purpose of this study was to determine the association between prior sleeve gastrectomy in patients undergoing primary total hip and knee arthroplasty, and 90-day complications, incidence of revision arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up.

Methods

This is a retrospective, single-centre analysis. Patients undergoing primary hip or knee arthroplasty with a prior sleeve gastrectomy were eligible for inclusion (n = 80 patients). A morbidly obese control group was established from the same institutional registry using a 1:2 match, for cases:controls with arthroplasty based on propensity score using age, sex, pre-sleeve gastrectomy BMI, Current Procedural Terminology code to identify anatomical location, and presurgical haemoglobin A1C. Outcomes included 90-day complications, incidence of revision arthroplasty, and patient-reported outcome scores at final follow-up. Multivariable logistic regressions evaluated associations of underlying preoperative demographic and treatment characteristics with outcomes.

Results

Complications within 90 days of surgery were increased in the sleeve gastrectomy group relative to the obese control group after controlling for underlying preoperative demographic characteristics (odds ratio (OR) 4.00 (95% CI 1.14 to 13.9); p = 0.030). Postoperative revisions were similar in the sleeve gastrectomy group relative to the obese control group after controlling for underlying preoperative demographic characteristics (OR 17.8 (95% CI 0.64 to 494.3); p = 0.090). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression decreased by a greater amount from pre- to postoperative in the obese controls relative to the sleeve gastrectomy group (OR 4.04 (95% CI 0.06 to 8.02); p = 0.047). PROMIS pain interference and physical function change from pre- to postoperative was not associated with sleeve gastrectomy status.

Conclusion

We found a higher rate of complications at 90 days in patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy prior to primary hip or knee arthroplasty relative to a matched, obese control population. Prosthetic revision rates were similar between the two groups, while improvements in PROMIS depression scores were larger in the obese cohort. This study suggests that sleeve gastrectomy to achieve preoperative weight loss prior to arthroplasty surgery may not mitigate early complication risks in obese patient populations.

Do patients with osteoarthritis lose weight prior to elective joint replacement?

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a known risk factor for the development of osteoarthritis and the subsequent need for joint replacement. Weight loss has been shown to reduce pain, disability, and the need for joint replacement, particularly in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to investigate pre-operative weight change in patients with hip, knee, and shoulder osteoarthritis at a regional, public hospital in Australia, to identify opportunities for pre-operative weight-loss intervention.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent elective primary total hip (THR), knee (TKR), and shoulder (TSR) replacement for osteoarthritis was conducted between December 2019 and December 2022. BMI data were collected at three time points: (1) general practitioner (GP) referral; (2) orthopaedic clinic review; and (3) pre-admission clinic (PAC) assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 496 patients were included in the study, of which 205 underwent THR, 251 underwent TKR, and 40 underwent TSR. The mean patient age was 67 years, and 46.4% were female. At the time of GP referral, the mean body mass index (BMI) was 31.4 kg/m2. Across the study period, only 2% of patients experienced clinically significant weight loss pre-operatively (≥5% of total body weight).

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated that very few patients lose weight prior to undergoing joint replacement in the public sector in Australia. This highlights the need for targeted non-surgical weight loss interventions for patients currently awaiting joint replacement.

The obesity challenge in joint replacement: a multifaceted analysis of self-reported health status and exercise capacity using NHANES data: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

Joint replacement is successful for end-stage oeteoarthritis, with obesity linked to elevated risk. But the impact of obesity on self-reported health and exercise capacity among joint replacement patients remains complex and requires investigation.

METHODS

This study utilizes data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to examine the relationship between obesity severity, demographic factors, medical comorbidities, and self-reported health status. The relationship between general health status and BMI was analyzed using multivariable regression, and further illustrated using a restricted cubic spline. Additionally, a bibliometric analysis and systematic review was done to frame the research within the broader context of existing knowledge and demographic specifics.

RESULTS

Analysis of NHANES data involving 327 joint replacement patients yielded intriguing insights. The difference in self-reported health between BMI groups did not achieve conventional statistical significance ( P =0.06), and multivariable analysis showed that even severely obese patients did not exhibit significantly elevated risk of poor/fair self-reported health compared to normal weight subjects. Among severely obese individuals (BMI>40), 40.63% still rated their health positively. However, stratified analyses indicated that obesity correlated with negative health reports across sex, age, and education strata. Notably, physical functioning emerged as a robust predictor of self-reported health, with those reporting no walking difficulties having significantly lower odds of poor/fair health (Odds ratio=0.37, P =0.01).

CONCLUSION

The study highlights the need for healthcare providers to consider individual physical abilities and comorbidities alongside obesity severity when discussing treatment options with joint replacement patients. It supports tailored interventions and informed shared decision-making. Future research could explore effective weight management strategies for obese individuals undergoing joint replacement.

Preoperative weight loss before total hip arthroplasty negatively impacts postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Obesity adversely impacts outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA), leading surgeons to impose body mass index cutoffs for patient eligibility and encourage preoperative weight loss. This study aimed to determine if preoperative weight loss impacts outcomes of THA in the general patient population and if it mitigates poor outcomes in obese patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent THA from 2013-2020 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Patients were stratified by weight loss of >10% of body weight over the preceding 6 months. We used multivariable linear and logistic regression models, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidities, to examine the effect of significant preoperative weight loss on 30-day outcomes after THA in the general and obese patient populations.

RESULTS

In the overall population, patients who lost significant weight preoperatively had significantly increased length of stay, were more likely to have a non-home discharge, return to the operating room, or be readmitted, and were more likely to experience numerous medical complications. In the obese population, patients who lost significant weight preoperatively had significantly increased length of stay and were more likely to require a transfusion or experience any medical complication.

DISCUSSION

Rapid significant preoperative weight loss is not associated with improved postoperative outcomes after THA in the obese population and is associated with worse outcomes in the general population. Arthroplasty surgeons should balance these risks with the risks of obesity when advising patients about preoperative weight loss prior to THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss Timing on Surgical Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Elevated body mass index (BMI) increases surgical complications post-total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the effects of rapid weight loss pre-THA remain unclear. This study evaluated patients who had initial BMIs between 40 and 50, and then achieved a BMI under 35 at various intervals before their THA. Comparisons were made with consistent obese and nonobese groups to understand potential complications.

METHODS

Using a national database, we categorized THA patients based on initial BMI and weight loss timing before the surgery. These were contrasted with those maintaining a steady BMI of 20 to 30 or 40 to 50. We monitored outcomes like periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), surgical site infections (SSI), and noninfectious revisions for 2 years postsurgery, incorporating demographic considerations. Statistical analyses utilized Chi-square tests for categorical outcomes and Student's t-tests for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Among patients who had a BMI of 45 to 50, weight loss 3 to 9 months presurgery increased PJI risks at 90 days (Odds Ratios [OR]: 2.15 to 5.22, P < .001). However, weight loss a year before the surgery lowered the PJI risk (OR: 0.14 to 0.27, P < .005). Constantly obese patients faced heightened PJI risks 1 to 2 years postsurgery (OR: 1.64 to 1.95, P < .015). Regarding SSI, risks increased with weight loss 3 to 9 months before surgery, but decreased when weight loss occurred a year earlier. In the BMI 40 to 45 group, weight loss 3 to 6 months presurgery showed higher PJI and SSI at 90 days (P < .001), with obese participants consistently at greater risk.

CONCLUSIONS

While high BMI poses THA risks, weight loss timing plays a crucial role in postoperative complications. Weight loss closer to the surgery (0 to 9 months) can heighten risks, but shedding weight a year in advance seems beneficial. Conversely, initiating weight loss approximately a year before surgery offers potential protective effects against postoperative issues. This highlights the importance of strategic weight management guidance for patients considering THA, ensuring optimal surgical results and reducing potential adverse outcomes.

Does Your Patient Need to Lose Weight? Weight Change Before and After Total Hip Arthroplasty Does Not Affect Health Care Utilization and Achievement of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference

BACKGROUND

Despite the potential negative impact of preoperative obesity on total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes, the association between preoperative and postoperative weight change and outcomes is much less understood. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the impact of preoperative and postoperative weight change and preoperative body mass index (BMI) on health care utilization, satisfaction, and achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short-Form (HOOS PS) and HOOS Pain.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary elective unilateral THA between January 2016 and December 2019 were included (N = 2,868). Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between BMI and preoperative and postoperative weight change on outcomes while controlling for demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

There was no association between preoperative weight change and prolonged length of stay (> 3 days), 90-day readmission, nonhome discharge, patient dissatisfaction at 1 year, or achievement of HOOS Pain or HOOS PS MCID. Postoperative weight loss was an independent risk factor for patient dissatisfaction at 1 year but was not associated with achievement of either HOOS Pain or HOOS PS MCID at 1-year postoperative. Preoperative obesity classes I to III were independent risk factors for nonhome discharge. Nevertheless, preoperative obesity class I and class II were associated with an increased probability of reaching HOOS Pain MCID. Preoperative BMI was not associated with an increased risk of patient dissatisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative weight change does not appear to influence health care utilization, satisfaction, or achievement of MCID in pain and function following THA. Postoperative weight loss may play a role as a risk factor for dissatisfaction following THA. Additionally, patients who had a higher baseline BMI may be more likely to see improvement in pain following THA. Therefore, when counseling obese patients for THA, surgeons must balance the risk of perioperative complications with the expectation of greater improvements in pain.

Go Big or Go Home: Obesity and Total Joint Arthroplasty

Obesity is highly prevalent, and it is expected to grow considerably in the United States. The association between obesity and an increased risk of complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is widely accepted. Many believe that patients with body mass index (BMI) >40 have complications rates that may outweigh the benefits of surgery and should consider delaying it. However, the current literature on obesity and outcomes following TJA is observational, very heterogeneous, and full of confounding variables. BMI in isolation has several flaws and recent literature suggests shifting from an exclusively BMI <40 cutoff to considering 5 to 10% preoperative weight loss. BMI cutoffs to TJA may also restrict access to care to our most vulnerable, marginalized populations. Moreover, only roughly 20% of patients instructed to lose weight for surgery are successful and the practice of demanding mandatory weight loss needs to be reconsidered until convincing evidence exists that supports risk reduction as a result of preoperative weight loss. Obese patients can benefit greatly from this life-changing procedure. When addressing the potential difficulties and by optimizing preoperative assessment and intraoperative management, the surgery can be conducted safely. A multidisciplinary patient-centered approach with patient engagement, shared decision-making, and informed consent is recommended.

The effect of body mass index and preoperative weight loss in people with obesity on postoperative outcomes to 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the association between obesity, preoperative weight loss and postoperative outcomes beyond 30- and 90-days post-arthroplasty. This study investigated whether body mass index (BMI) and preoperative weight loss in people with obesity predict postoperative complications and patient-reported outcomes 6 months following total knee or hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two independent, prospectively collected datasets of people undergoing primary total knee or hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis between January 2013 and June 2018 at two public hospitals were merged. First, the sample was grouped into BMI categories, < 35 kg/m2 and ≥ 35 kg/m2. Subgroup analysis was completed separately for hips and knees. Second, a sample of people with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 was stratified into participants who did or did not lose ≥ 5% of their baseline weight preoperatively. The presence of postoperative complications, Oxford Hip Score, Oxford Knee Score, EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale and patient-rated improvement 6 months post-surgery were compared using unadjusted and adjusted techniques.

RESULTS

From 3,552 and 9,562 patients identified from the datasets, 1,337 were included in the analysis after merging. After adjustment for covariates, there was no difference in postoperative complication rate to 6 months post-surgery according to BMI category (OR 1.0, 95%CI 0.8-1.4, P = 0.8) or preoperative weight loss (OR 1.1, 95%CI 0.7-1.8, P = 0.7). There was no between-group difference according to BMI or preoperative weight change for any patient-reported outcomes 6 months post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative BMI or a 5% reduction in preoperative BMI in people with obesity was not associated with postoperative outcomes to 6 months following total knee or hip arthroplasty.

Self-Reported Health of Severely Obese US Adults With Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Severe obesity is associated with complications following arthroplasty, leading surgeons to increasingly counsel patients regarding weight loss. For patients seeking arthroplasty, learning that severe obesity may be a relative contraindication to surgery can create a challenging clinical interaction. We sought to describe the self-reported health of United States (US) adults who had severe obesity and osteoarthritis (OA) to better understand patient perspectives.

METHODS

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a nationally representative sample of the US population, was used to identify adult participants who had a body mass index (BMI) over 35 and an OA diagnosis. In total, 889 participants representing a US population of 9,604,722 were included. Self-reported health was dichotomized as poor to fair versus good to excellent. Analyses were weighted to produce national estimates. Associations between obesity severity and patient characteristics with self-reported health were assessed.

RESULTS

Of US adults with a BMI over 35 and OA diagnosis, 64% rated their health as good or better. For adults who had a BMI over 45, 55% still reported their health as good or better. The strongest predictors of self-reported health were measures of physical functioning. Only 37% of participants who had much difficulty walking a quarter mile rated their health as good or better compared to 86% without difficulty (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Approximately two-thirds of patients who have severe obesity and OA do not perceive their health as compromised and consider decreased physical function as the primary driver of decreased health. This suggests that counseling about the association between obesity and overall health may improve shared decision making and that patient satisfaction metrics may be difficult to interpret in these clinical situations.