Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: An Updated Systematic Review

Stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the knee

BACKGROUND

Stem cells are specialised precursor cells that can replace aged or damaged cells and thereby maintain healthy tissue function. Stem cell therapy is increasingly used as a treatment for knee osteoarthritis, despite the lack of clarity around the mechanism by which stem cell therapy may slow down disease progression in osteoarthritis, and uncertainty regarding its benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of stem cell injections for people with osteoarthritis of the knee. A secondary objective is to maintain the currency of the evidence, using a living systematic review approach.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and Embase on 15 September 2023, unrestricted by date or language of publication. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) for relevant trial protocols and ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), or trials using quasi-randomised methods of participant allocation, comparing stem cell injection with placebo injection, no treatment or usual care, glucocorticoid injection, other injections, exercise, drug therapy, surgical interventions, and supplements and complementary therapies in people with knee osteoarthritis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors selected studies for inclusion, extracted trial characteristics and outcome data, assessed risk of bias and assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. The primary comparison was stem cell injection compared with placebo injection. The primary time point for pain, function and quality of life was three to six months, and the end of the trial period for participant-reported success, joint structure changes and adverse event outcomes. Major outcomes were pain, function, quality of life, global assessment of success, radiographic joint progression, withdrawals due to adverse events and serious adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 25 randomised trials (1341 participants) comparing stem cell injections with placebo injection (eight trials), no treatment or usual care (analgesia, weight loss and exercise) (two trials), glucocorticoid injection (one trial), hyaluronic acid injection (seven trials), platelet-rich plasma injections (two trials), oral acetaminophen (paracetamol) (one trial), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs plus physical therapy plus hyaluronic acid injection (one trial) and stem cell injection plus intra-articular co-intervention versus co-intervention alone (three trials) in people with osteoarthritis of the knee. Trials were predominantly small, with sample sizes ranging from 6 to 252 participants, with only two trials having more than 100 participants. The average age of participants across trials ranged from 51 to 66 years, and symptom duration varied from one to 10 years. Placebo-controlled trials were largely free from bias, while most trials without a placebo control were susceptible to performance and detection biases. Here, we limit reporting to the main comparison, stem cell injection versus placebo injection. Compared with placebo injection, stem cell injection may slightly improve pain and function up to six months after treatment. Mean pain (0 to 10 scale, 0 no pain) was 4.5 out of 10 points with placebo injection and 1.2 points better (2.5 points better to 0 points better) with stem cell injection (I2 = 80%; 7 studies, 445 participants). Mean function (0 to 100 scale, 0 best function) was 46.3 points with placebo injection and 14.2 points better (25.3 points better to 3.1 points better) with stem cell injection (I2 = 82%; 7 studies, 432 participants). We are uncertain whether stem cell injections improve quality of life or increase the number of people who report treatment success compared to placebo injection, because the certainty of the evidence was very low. Mean quality of life was 45.3 points with placebo injection and 22.8 points better (18.0 points worse to 63.7 points better) with stem cell injection (I2 = 96%; 2 studies, 288 participants) at up to six months follow-up. At the end of follow-up, 89/168 participants (530 per 1000) in the placebo injection group reported treatment success compared with 126/180 participants (683 per 1000) in the stem cell injection group (risk ratio (RR) 1.29, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.53; I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 348 participants). We downgraded the evidence to low certainty for pain and function due to indirectness (as the source, method of preparation and dose of stem cells varied across studies), and suspected publication bias (up to three larger RCTs have been conducted but withdrawn prior to reporting of results). For quality of life and treatment success, we further downgraded the evidence to very low certainty due to imprecision in addition to indirectness and suspected publication bias. We are uncertain of the potential harms associated with stem cell injection, as there were very low event rates for serious adverse events. At the end of follow-up, 5/219 participants (23 per 1000) in the placebo injection group experienced serious adverse events compared with 4/242 participants (16 per 1000) in the stem cell injection group (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.64; I2 = 0%; 7 trials, 461 participants) and there were no reported withdrawals due to adverse events. We downgraded the evidence to very low certainty due to indirectness, suspected publication bias and imprecision. Radiographic progression was not assessed in any of the included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo injections and based upon low-certainty evidence, stem cell injections for people with knee osteoarthritis may slightly improve pain and function. We are uncertain of the effects of stem cell injections on quality of life or the number who report treatment success. Although the putative benefits of stem cell therapies for osteoarthritis include potential regenerative effects on damaged tissues, particularly articular cartilage, we remain uncertain of the effect of stem cell injections on structural progression in the knee (measured by radiographic appearance). There is also uncertainty regarding the safety of stem cell injections. Serious adverse events were infrequently reported, although all invasive joint procedures (including injections) carry a small risk of septic arthritis. The risk of other important harms, including potential concerns related to the use of a therapy with the theoretical capacity to promote cell growth, or to the use of allogeneic cells, remains unknown.

Most Publications Regarding Platelet-Rich Plasma Use in the Knee Are From Asia, Investigate Injection for Osteoarthritis, and Show Outcome Improvement: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

To evaluate and synthesize the available literature related to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment of knee pathologies and to provide recommendations to inform future research in the field.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases were queried on October 6, 2023. All identified citations were collated and uploaded into Covidence for screening and data extraction. Studies were included if they were human studies published in English with adult cohorts that received PRP as a procedural injection or surgical augmentation for knee pathologies with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and level of evidence Levels I-IV.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 2,615 studies, of which 155 studies from 2006 to 2023 met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 9 months (±11.2 months). Most studies (75.5%) characterized the leukocyte content of PRP, although most studies (86%) did not use a comprehensive classification scheme. In addition, most studies were from Asia (50%) and Europe (32%) and were from a single center (96%). In terms of treatment, 74% of studies examined PRP as a procedural injection, whereas 26% examined PRP as an augmentation. Most studies (68%) examined treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Many studies (83%) documented significant improvements in PROMs, including 93% of Level III/IV evidence studies and 72% of Level I/II evidence studies, although most studies (70%) failed to include minimal clinically important difference values. The visual analog scale was the most-used PROM (58% of studies), whereas the Short Form Health Survey 36-item was the least-used PROM (5% of studies).

CONCLUSIONS

Most published investigations of knee PRP are performed in Asia, investigate procedural injection for osteoarthritis, and show significant outcome improvements. In addition, this review highlights the need for better classification of PRP formulations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, scoping review of Level I-IV studies.

Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Has No Advantage Over Platelet-Rich Plasma and Bone Marrow Aspirate Injections for Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Microfragmented adipose tissue has been proposed for intra-articular treatment of knee osteoarthritis. There are little data comparing the outcomes of treatment between microfragmented adipose tissue and other biological treatments.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing microfragmented aspirated fat injections to other orthobiologics, hyaluronic acid, and corticosteroid injections for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify pertinent publications in the MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, including all level 1 to 3 studies from 2000 to 2023. Validated knee scores (visual analog scale [VAS] for pain, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee) were included as outcome measures. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of the body of evidence and the modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess study quality. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ2 and I2 statistics.

RESULTS

Five studies were included in the analysis. One study had a high risk of bias; 4 studies had some risk of bias. The overall study quality was fair, and the certainty of evidence was low. The pooled estimate for VAS scores did not demonstrate significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months. The pooled estimate for the KOOS Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living, Sport and Recreation, and Quality of Life subscales did not demonstrate significant differences at 3, 6, and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that there were no statistically significant differences for both the clinical outcomes and pain scores between microfragmented adipose tissue and other orthobiologics for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. However, modest study quality, some risk of bias, and low certainty of evidence reduce external validity, and these results must be viewed with some caution.

An Innovative Delivery System of Oxygen-Releasing Nanospheres and Self-Healing Hydrogels Enhances the Therapeutic Effectiveness of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Purpose

Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have emerged as promising candidate for postoperative therapeutics in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Nevertheless, their effectiveness is limited by their low survival rate and impaired functionality in the ischemic microenvironment. To overcome these challenges, we have devised an innovative delivery approach to support the utilization of BMSCs in CLTI therapy.

Methods

We synthesized oxygen-releasing nanospheres and self-healing hydrogels. The in vivo functionality of the hydrogel-nanosphere delivery system was evaluated via a multimodality animal live imaging system. A unilateral lower limb ischemia model was established in mice, and a delivery system loaded with BMSCs was administered. The experimental groups included normal mice, ischemic mice, ischemic mice treated with BMSCs in PBS, and ischemic mice treated with BMSCs in the delivery system. Blood perfusion was quantitatively measured via a laser doppler flowmeter (LDF). Immunofluorescence, Masson's trichrome staining, immunohistochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were also used.

Results

For cell viability analysis 80 μg.mL-1 was considered the optimal concentration for cell survival. In vivo, 18 days after injection, the cell membrane fluorescence signal in the delivery system was significantly greater (5.65510±8.2268) p/s/cm²/sr than that in the other groups (p=0.043). Ischemic mice treated with BMSCs in the delivery system presented an improved limb salvage rate (0.926±0.12)% compared with that of ischemic mice treated with BMSCs in PBS (0.841±0.029)% at the 5th week after ischemia establishment (p=0.0033).

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the survival time of BMSCs is prolonged in this innovative delivery system. The combination of nanospheres and hydrogels effectively restored vascular blood perfusion while exerting minimal toxicity on BMSCs. This novel approach combining oxygen-releasing nanospheres and self-healing hydrogels as a delivery system represents an advancement in enhancing the functionality of BMSCs to treat CLTI.

Beyond Boundaries of a Trial: Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up of SOYA Patients

Background/Objectives: osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of disability. With an aging population and rising obesity rates, OA presents a growing challenge to health systems worldwide. Current OA treatments involve a mix of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid (HA) has proven effective, especially in knee OA, leading to its recommendation in international guidelines. This study investigates the sustained benefits of a single intra-articular HA injection beyond one year in patients coming from the SOYA trial, considering the EU MDR 2017/745 emphasis on post-market follow-up. Methods: A prospective, observational, open, post-marketing study in a cohort of patients that participated in the SOYA trial. Follow-up was carried out by means of a telephone survey, and the data were anonymized and coded so that patients could not be identified. The study was approved by the Alcorcón Hospital Institutional Review Board (Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain). Results: In the follow-up of the SOYA trial, 81.5% of patients sustained positive effects for over 6 months after the trial ended. This correlated with improved daily functioning, enhanced mood, and high patient satisfaction. Younger age and milder OA grades were associated with prolonged treatment effects. Notably, 82% of patients with >6 months of improvement did not require additional medication. Conclusions: the results of this study support the safety and performance of Adant® Plus as a treatment for patients with mild and moderate knee OA, with results lasting more than one year. Post-marketing studies are particularly relevant to examine the experience gained with the use of the device in routine clinical practice.

Conservative Treatment for Ankle Cartilage: Cellular and Acellular Therapies: A Systematic Review

Biological agents like growth factors (ie, platelet rich plasma) and mesenchymal stem cells are rising in popularity among orthopedics. Orthobiologics therapy aims to fill the gap between conventional conservative therapies like hyaluronic acid and surgery, especially for cartilage disease. Ankle cartilage defects are very symptomatic and could lead to a severe decrease of quality of life in patients, because of pain, swelling, and inability to walk without pain. In this scenario, this paper aims to systematically review the current literature available about biological therapies for ankle cartilage.

Wharton's jelly and osteoarthritis of the knee

INTRODUCTION

The existing treatment modalities for knee osteoarthritis (OA) do not actually address the pathology. Biological therapies, including those using material derived from perinatal tissues, represent a ground-breaking approach to alleviating the symptoms of OA of the knee.

SOURCE OF DATA

Current scientific literature published in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase and Scopus databases. Trials registered in various clinical trial databases.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Perinatal tissues including Wharton's jelly (WJ) and associated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can be used for the management of knee OA.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The efficacy of WJ and associated MSCs in the management of knee OA is still controversial.

GROWING POINTS

The use of WJ and associated MSCs in the management of knee OA is safe and appears to be effective.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

The present published evidence suggests that WJ tissue and associated MSCs offer an encouraging alternative for the management of knee OA. The published in vitro, preclinical and clinical investigations demonstrate the therapeutic potential of WJ and promote further research in this field to provide symptomatic relief to patients suffering from OA, aiming also to regenerate the osteoarthritic hyaline cartilage, with disease-modifying effects. Future adequately powered randomized controlled trials should be undertaken to establish whether WJ is helpful in the management of OA of the knee.

An Update on Orthobiologics: Cautious Optimism

Orthobiologics are rapidly growing in use given their potential to augment healing for multiple musculoskeletal conditions. Orthobiologics consist of a variety of treatments including platelet-rich plasma and stem cells that provide conceptual appeal in providing local delivery of growth factors and inflammation modulation. The lack of standardization in nomenclature and applications within the literature has led to a paucity of high-quality evidence to support their frequent use. The purpose of this review was to describe the current landscape of orthobiologics and the most recent evidence regarding their use.

A standardized nutraceutical supplement contributes to pain relief, improves quality of life and regulates inflammation in knee osteoarthritis patients; A randomized clinical trial

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative disease of the joints that affects greatly the elderly population and the health care systems and is on the increase due to aging and obesity. Interventions aim at palliative care and pharmaceutical therapies entail serious adverse events. Whereas polyphenols constitute a promising holistic approach in the arsenal of physicians, trials investigating biomarkers and questionnaires are scarce. As such, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate the potency of a standardized polyphenolic supplement in the management of systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, pain and general quality of life (QoL) in patients with osteoarthritis. Sixty subjects were randomized to receive either a polyphenol supplement (curcuma phospholipid, rosemary extract, resveratrol, ascorbic acid), or an active comparator (ascorbic acid) twice, daily for 12 weeks. The group that received the polyphenols exhibited significantly lower symptoms of pain and improved physical function and QoL as it was depicted by validated questionnaires, compared to the control group. Furthermore, post intervention, inflammation was restrained in the polyphenol group. Since systemic inflammation promotes local inflammation, the decrease of pain herein might be attributed to the attenuation of systemic inflammation by the polyphenols.

Role of lateral soft tissue release in percutaneous hallux valgus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether lateral soft tissue release (LSTR) is required as part of percutaneous hallux valgus (PHV) surgery. The primary aim of this systematic review was to assess whether LSTR reduces the risk of recurrence of hallux valgus deformity. The secondary aims were to assess if LSTR increases the risk of complications, improves the clinical outcome and leads to a greater radiographic correction.

METHODS

We performed a PRISMA-compliant PROSPERO-registered systematic review, pooling clinical papers reporting results after PHV surgery into two categories (PHV with (Group 1, G1) and without LSTR (Group 2, G2)) and comparing them. Data regarding the study design, demographics, the surgical procedure and the clinical and radiological outcome were extracted and compared. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were selected (G1:594 feet; G2:553 feet). The pooled proportion of recurrence at a minimum 21-month follow-up (2%, 95%CI 0-3 vs 2%, 95%CI 0-5; p = 0.70) did not differ in the two groups. Similarly, the pooled proportion of complications (27%, 95%CI 17-38 vs 25%, 95%CI 12-37; p = 0.79) was similar. The pre- (p = 0.23) and post-operative AOFAS scores (p = 0.16), the pre-(HVA: p = 0.23) (IMA: p = 0.94) and post-operative radiological angles (HVA: p = 0.47) (IMA: p = 0.2) and the methodological quality of studies (p = 0.2) did not differ either between G1 and G2.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that LSTR performed during percutaneous HV surgery reduces the risk of recurrence of the deformity at a mean 4-year follow-up nor improves the clinical and radiological outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV systematic review of Level I to IV studies.

Synovial Fluid Derived from Human Knee Osteoarthritis Increases the Viability of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells through Upregulation of FOSL1

Knee osteoarthritis (Knee OA) is an irreversible condition that causes bone deformity and degeneration of the articular cartilage that comprises the joints, resulting in chronic pain and movement disorders. The administration of cultured adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) into the knee joint cavity improves the clinical symptoms of Knee OA; however, the effect of synovial fluid (SF) filling the joint cavity on the injected ADSCs remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effect of adding SF from Knee OA patients to cultured ADSCs prepared for therapeutic use in an environment that mimics the joint cavity. An increase in the viability of ADSCs was observed following the addition of SF. Gene expression profiling of SF-treated ADSCs using DNA microarrays revealed changes in several genes involved in cell survival. Of these genes, we focused on FOSL1, which is involved in the therapeutic effect of ADSCs and the survival and proliferation of cancer stem cells. We confirmed the upregulation of FOSL1 mRNA and protein expression using RT-PCR and western blot analysis, respectively. Next, we knocked down FOSL1 in ADSCs using siRNA and observed a decrease in cell viability, indicating the involvement of FOSL1 in the survival of ADSCs. Interestingly, in the knockdown cells, ADSC viability was also decreased by SF exposure. These results suggest that SF enhances cell viability by upregulating FOSL1 expression in ADSCs. For therapy using cultured ADSCs, the therapeutic effect of ADSCs may be further enhanced if an environment more conducive to the upregulation of FOSL1 expression in ADSCs can be established.

Orthobiologic Injections for the Treatment of Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review

The use of orthobiologics is gaining increasing interest as a minimally invasive treatment for hip osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to investigate the evidence about the safety and efficacy of these products. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines. The study quality was assessed using the RoB 2.0 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS) for all studies. A total of 20 clinical studies (735 patients) was identified, 12 on PRP injections and eight on cell-based therapies (five from bone marrow, two from adipose tissue, and one from amniotic fluid). The publication trend increased over time, with over 50% of articles published from 2019. The literature analysis showed only six RCTs, all on PRP injections. The mCMS showed an overall fair methodology (mean score 59.4). While the number of studies and their methodology are still limited, the available evidence suggests safety and overall promising results, with the treatment success being inversely proportional to the severity of OA. Further high-level controlled trials are needed before drawing more definitive conclusions on the real potential of orthobiologics for the injective treatment of patients affected by hip OA.

Does Bone Marrow Edema Influence the Clinical Results of Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections for Knee Osteoarthritis?

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used for the intra-articular treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, clinical studies on PRP injections reported controversial results. Bone marrow edema (BME) can cause symptoms by affecting the subchondral bone and it is not targeted by intra-articular treatments. The aim of this study was to investigate if the presence of BME can influence the outcome of intra-articular PRP injections in knee OA patients. A total of 201 patients were included in the study, 80 with and 121 without BME at the baseline MRI. BME area and site were evaluated, and BME was graded using the Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS). Patients were assessed with International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, the EuroQol-Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), and the Tegner score at baseline, 2, 6, and 12 months. Overall, the presence of BME did not influence the clinical results of intra-articular PRP injections in these patients treated for knee OA. Patients with BME presented a similar failure rate and clinical improvement after PRP treatment compared to patients without BME. The area and site of BME did not affect clinical outcomes. However, patients with a higher BME grade had a higher failure rate.