Increased Risk of Hospital Readmissions and Implant-Related Complications in Patients Who Had a Recent History of Fragility Fracture: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with knee osteoarthritis awaiting total knee arthroplasty is similar to that in the general population

BACKGROUND

Osteoporosis is common in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) awaiting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and varies in different regional and ethnic. However, it is unclear whether the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in these patients is different from that in the general population. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in both populations to help exploring the relationship between the osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, and to explore whether knee function and radiological assessments of KOA are associated with osteoporosis.

METHODS

In total, 249 patients diagnosed with KOA awaiting TKA were investigated in this cross-sectional study. The mean age was 70.9 ± 6.4 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) and T scores at the hip and lumbar spine were used to assess bone status using dual X-ray absorptiometry. A matched cohort from 2448 individuals in the Health Examination Center of our hospital was set as controls by matching sex, age (± 3.0 years) and BMI (± 1.0). The Kellgren-Lawrence grades (K-L grades), mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and range of motion (ROM) of the knee were measured to evaluate radiological assessments and knee function in patients awaiting TKA and used to explore the association between KOA and BMD or T score. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia were investigated in the two cohorts, and inferential statistical analyses were undertaken. The chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables while comparisons of scores were examined by ANOVA with/without Bonferroni correction or the Kruskal‒Wallis test.

RESULTS

The prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in patients awaiting TKA was 30.5% (76/249) and 44.2% (110/249), respectively. In the matched cohort, 72/249 (28.9%) had osteoporosis, while 98/249 (39.4%) had osteopenia. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of osteoporosis or osteopenia between the two groups (χ2 = 2.603, P = 0.272). mFTA was significantly correlated with BMD and T score (P < 0.05), while no correlation was found between K-L grade, ROM or WOMAC and BMD or T score (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of osteoporosis in patients awaiting TKA was similar to that in the general population. BMD and T score were not correlated with WOMAC score or K-L grade but were correlated with mFTA.

Advanced Care Planning for the Orthopaedic Patient

➢ Advanced care planning most commonly refers to the act of planning and preparing for decisions with regard to end-of-life care and/or serious illness based on a patient's personal values, life goals, and preferences.➢ Over time, advanced care planning and its formalization through advanced directives have demonstrated substantial benefits to patients, their families and caregivers, and the larger health-care system.➢ Despite these benefits, advanced care planning and advanced directives remain underutilized.➢ Orthopaedic surgeons interact with patients during sentinel events, such as fragility hip fractures, that indicate a decline in the overall health trajectory.➢ Orthopaedic surgeons must familiarize themselves with the concepts and medicolegal aspects of advanced care planning so that care can be optimized for patients during sentinel health events.

Osteoporosis in the setting of knee arthroplasty: a narrative review

Patients undergoing knee replacement, which is mainly indicated in severe osteoarthritis, are frequently co-affected by osteoporosis and osteopenia. With a prevalence standing at around 20% in patients receiving knee arthroplasty, osteoporosis could lead to poor outcomes postoperatively. Some of these complications include periprosthetic fractures and an increased revision rate. Antiresorptive medications have been shown to be beneficial postoperatively. However, no studies have been conducted on whether they had any benefits if given preoperatively. Surgical management may also be beneficial, but this area remains full of controversy.

Systemic Osteoporosis and Osteopenia Among Periprosthetic Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Most periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses. However, it remains unknown how many patients were diagnosed who had osteoporosis before injury or received the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment after injury.

METHODS

We identified 171 Vancouver B2 (109) and B3 (62) periprosthetic femur fractures treated with a modular fluted tapered stem from 2000 to 2018 at 1 institution. The mean patient age was 75 years (range, 35 to 94), 50% were women, and the mean body mass index was 29 (range, 17 to 60). We identified patients who had osteoporosis or osteopenia diagnoses, a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), bone mineral density (BMD) testing, an endocrinology consult, and osteoporosis medications. Age-appropriate BMD testing was defined as no later than 1 year after the recommended ages of 65 (women) or 70 years (men). The mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 4 to 21).

RESULTS

Falls from standing height caused 94% of fractures and thus, by definition, qualified as osteoporosis-defining events. The prevalence of osteoporosis diagnosis increased from 20% before periprosthetic fracture to 39% after (P < .001). The prevalence of osteopenia diagnosis increased from 13% before the fracture to 24% after (P < .001). The prevalence of either diagnosis increased from 24% before fracture to 44% after (P < .001). No patients had documented FRAX scores before fracture, and only 2% had scores after. The prevalence of BMD testing was 21% before fracture and 22% after (P = .88). By the end of the final follow-up, only 16% had received age-appropriate BMD testing. The proportion of patients who had endocrinology consults increased from 6% before the fracture to 25% after (P < .001). The proportion on bisphosphonate therapy was 19% before fracture and 25% after (P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most periprosthetic fractures following THA are fragility fractures that qualify patients for osteoporosis diagnoses, there remain major gaps in diagnosis, screening, endocrinology follow-up, and treatment. Like nonarthroplasty fragility fractures, a systematic approach is needed after periprosthetic fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Complications of periprosthetic fracture revision vs aseptic revision of total knee arthroplasty

Background

Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are a challenging problem due to complex fracture patterns, poor bone quality, and a high-risk patient population. Treatment of both periprosthetic fractures and aseptic complications can include revision TKA. In this study, we compared systemic and orthopaedic complications following periprosthetic fracture associated revision TKA to aseptic revision TKA.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study using data from the years 2010-2020 from a national administrative claims database. Billing codes were used to identify revision TKAs with a diagnosis of periprosthetic fracture or aseptic complications (loosening, dislocation, arthrofibrosis, osteolysis, or prosthetic wear) within one year prior to revision. Pertinent systemic complications and rates of repeat revision TKA, periprosthetic infection, and repeat fractures were compared between the two groups.

Results

We identified 9891 periprosthetic fracture associated revision TKAs and 47,071 aseptic revision TKAs. Our study found higher rate of systemic complications including AKI, DVT, wound disruption, hematoma, and surgical site infections in periprosthetic fracture associated revision TKA compared to aseptic revision TKA. Furthermore, we found higher rates of repeat revision TKA, periprosthetic infections, and repeat periprosthetic fractures in fracture associated revision TKA group compared to aseptic revision group.

Conclusions

Our work highlights the significant short- and long-term complications associated with periprosthetic fracture associated revision TKA. Future working comparing functional outcomes and optimal surgical techniques are needed.

Periprosthetic fractures are osteoporotic fractures: missed opportunities for osteoporosis diagnosis

Joint replacement surgery is common in older adults, leading to increasing periprosthetic fracture (PPFx) occurrence. We reviewed all PPFx seen over a 4-year period at an academic hospital. Clinical osteoporosis could be diagnosed based on existing data in 104 (67%) at the time of PPFx. Periprosthetic fractures are generally osteoporosis-related.

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) cause morbidity, mortality, and cost. This study's purpose was to describe osteoporosis-related data available at the time of PPFx.

METHODS

The electronic medical record (EMR) of PPFx patients seen over 4 years in a university orthopedic practice were reviewed. Demographic data and osteoporosis relevant parameters were collected. Prior DXA studies were reviewed, and L1 Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements were performed on CT scans obtained within 2 years before PPFx. Clinical osteoporosis was defined as prior diagnosis, prescribed osteoporosis treatment, T-score ≤  - 2.5, HU ≤ 100, or prior fracture.

RESULTS

Records of 156 PPFx patients (115 F/41 M), mean (SD) age 75.4 (11.9), were reviewed. Almost all 153/156 (98%) of these fractures were femoral. Falls caused 139 (89%); 12 (8%) were spontaneous. Mean time post-arthroplasty was 7.9 (6.3) years. Prior fragility fracture(s) occurred in 72 (46%); 14 were PPFx. Osteoporosis was previously diagnosed in 45 (29%) and medications prescribed in 41 (26%). Prior to PPFx, DXA data were available in 62, mean (SD) lowest T-score was - 1.9 (0.9) and was ≤  - 2.5 in 19. CT data were available in 46; mean (SD) L1 HU was 79.0 (29.4) and was ≤ 100 in 35. Based on existing data, clinical osteoporosis could have been diagnosed in 104 (67%) at the time of PPFx.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic fractures are osteoporosis-related. They occur in older adults, often female, and result from falls; BMD, when assessed, is low. Data available at the time of PPFx often allows osteoporosis diagnosis; this should prompt evaluation and pharmacologic treatment consideration.

Osteoporosis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Higher 5-Year Implant-Related Complications

BACKGROUND

The risk of revision surgery in patients who have osteoporosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is understudied. Our aim was to compare the 5-year cumulative risk of revision surgery after TKA in patients who have preoperative osteoporosis.

METHODS

A national administrative claims database was queried for patients undergoing primary TKA from 2010 to 2021. There were 418,054 patients included, and 41,760 (10%) had osteoporosis. The 5-year incidence of revision surgery was examined for all-causes, periprosthetic fracture (PPF), aseptic loosening, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). A multivariable analysis was conducted using Cox proportional hazards models. Hazards ratios (HRs) were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

The 5-year rate of all-cause revision surgery was higher for patients who had osteoporosis (HR 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0 to 1.2), however, the highest risk of revision surgery was seen for PPF (HR 1.8, 95% CI: 1.6 to 2.1). Patients who had osteoporosis also had elevated risk of revision surgery for PJI (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.3) and aseptic loosening (HR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.3). Osteoporosis was independently associated with PJI and aseptic loosening at a higher rate in obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In unadjusted survival analysis, those who had osteoporosis have a marginally lower risk of all-cause revision surgery. However, after controlling for age, sex and comorbidities, patients who had osteoporosis have a nearly 2-fold increased risk of 5-year revision for PPF after TKA, and mildly increased risk of revision for all causes, aseptic loosening, and PJI. Obesity may also modulate this association. Future studies should determine the extent to which treatment of osteoporosis modifies these postoperative outcomes.

Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated With Increased Rates of Postoperative Stiffness Requiring Manipulation Under Anesthesia and Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and adhesive capsulitis (AC) of the shoulder develop via a similar pathologic process. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between these two conditions.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using a large nationwide claims database. Patients who had a history of shoulder AC prior to TKA were compared to TKA patients who did not have AC history comparing rates of postoperative stiffness, manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOAs), and revision arthroplasty at postoperative timepoints (3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years).

RESULTS

Within 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years of their TKAs, patients who had a history of AC prior to TKA were significantly more likely to experience stiffness (OR [odds ratio] = 1.29, 1.28, 1.32, and 1.36, respectively) and LOAs (OR = 6.78, 3.65, 2.99, and 2.81, respectively). They also showed increased risk of MUA within 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years (OR = 1.15, 1.15, and 1.16, respectively) of their TKAs. Patients having a preoperative diagnosis of AC did not have an increased risk of undergoing revision surgery 1 year or 2 years after their TKAs (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed with AC prior to TKA experience higher rates of postoperative stiffness, resulting in additional interventions such as MUA and LOAs. These findings identify a particularly high-risk patient population that may benefit from additional interventions prior to and following TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a level III prognostic study.

Postoperative Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Use is Associated With Decreased Rates of Manipulation Under Anesthesia, Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions, and Prosthesis-Related Complications in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The cellular mechanisms underlying excess scar tissue formation in arthrofibrosis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are well-described. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), particularly losartan, is a commonly prescribed antihypertensive with demonstrated antifibrotic properties. This retrospective study aimed to assess the rates of 1- and 2-year postoperative complications in patients who filled prescriptions for ARBs during the 90 days after TKA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary TKA were selected from a large national insurance database, and the impact of ARB use after TKA on complications was assessed. Of the 1,299,106 patients who underwent TKA, 82,065 had filled at least a 90-day prescription of losartan, valsartan, or olmesartan immediately following their TKA. The rates of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA), aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and revision at 1 and 2 years following TKA were analyzed using multivariable logistic regressions to control for various comorbidities.

RESULTS

ARB use was associated with decreased rates of MUA (odds ratio [OR] = 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90 to 0.99), arthroscopy/LOA (OR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.95), aseptic loosening (OR = 0.71, 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.83), periprosthetic fracture (OR = 0.58, 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.71), and revision (OR = 0.79, 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.85) 2 years after TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

ARB use throughout the 90 days after TKA is associated with a decreased risk of MUA, arthroscopy/LOA, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and revision, demonstrating the potential protective abilities of ARBs. Prospective studies evaluating the use of ARBs in patients at risk for postoperative stiffness would be beneficial to further elucidate this association.

Team Approach: Bone Health Optimization in Orthopaedic Surgery

» Bone health optimization (BHO) has become an increasingly important consideration in orthopaedic surgery because deterioration of bone tissue and low bone density are associated with poor outcomes after orthopaedic surgeries.» Management of patients with compromised bone health requires numerous healthcare professionals including orthopaedic surgeons, primary care physicians, nutritionists, and metabolic bone specialists in endocrinology, rheumatology, or obstetrics and gynecology. Therefore, achieving optimal bone health before orthopaedic surgery necessitates a collaborative and synchronized effort among healthcare professionals.» Patients with poor bone health are often asymptomatic and may present to the orthopaedic surgeon for reasons other than poor bone health. Therefore, it is imperative to recognize risk factors such as old age, female sex, and low body mass index, which predispose to decreased bone density.» Workup of suspected poor bone health entails bone density evaluation. For patients without dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan results within the past 2 years, perform DXA scan in all women aged 65 years and older, all men aged 70 years and older, and women younger than 65 years or men younger than 70 years with concurrent risk factors for poor bone health. All women and men presenting with a fracture secondary to low-energy trauma should receive DXA scan and bone health workup; for fractures secondary to high-energy trauma, perform DXA scan and further workup in women aged 65 years and older and men aged 70 years and older.» Failure to recognize and treat poor bone health can result in poor surgical outcomes including implant failure, periprosthetic infection, and nonunion after fracture fixation. However, collaborative healthcare teams can create personalized care plans involving nutritional supplements, antiresorptive or anabolic treatment, and weight-bearing exercise programs, resulting in BHO before surgery. Ultimately, this coordinated approach can enhance the success rate of surgical interventions, minimize complications, and improve patients' overall quality of life.

Two-stage revision knee arthroplasty for metallosis in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis: A case report

We report a successful case of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty performed for treating painless metallosis after total knee arthroplasty with a metal-backed patella. A 63-year-old woman diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis underwent left total knee arthroplasty with a metal-backed patella at 32 years of age. The patient did not have knee pain; however, knee joint swelling, a strange noise, and pigmentation were reported 4 years ago. Radiographs showed cloud and metal-line signs anteriorly and posteriorly at the femoral condyle. Therefore, a two-stage surgery was performed for infection prevention and ease of performing posterior synovectomy. The patient underwent initial synovectomy via a posterior approach, followed by anterior synovectomy and revision total knee arthroplasty. Synovectomy was performed well without perioperative infection or failure of wound healing. In cases with metallosis after total knee arthroplasty, the two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty should be considered, depending on the degree of synovial proliferation and the risk of complications.

The impact of prior fragility fractures on long-term periprosthetic fracture risk following total knee arthroplasty

The study found that patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with prior fragility fracture had increased risk of subsequent fragility fracture and periprosthetic fracture within 8 years postoperatively when compared to those without a prior history. However, these patients were not at increased risk for all-cause revision within this period.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to characterize the association of prior FFs on long-term risk of secondary fragility fracture (FF), periprosthetic fracture (PPF), and revision TKA.

METHODS

Patients at least 50 years of age who underwent elective TKA were identified in the PearlDiver Database. Patients were stratified based on whether they sustained a FF within 3 years prior to TKA (7410 patients) or not (712,954 patients). Demographics and comorbidities were collected. Kaplan Meier analysis was used to observe the cumulative incidence of all-cause revision, PPF, and secondary FF within 8 years of TKA. Cox Proportional hazard ratio analysis was used to statistically compare the risk.

RESULTS

In total, 1.0% of patients had a FF within three years of TKA. Of these patients, only 22.6% and 10.9% had a coded diagnosis of osteoporosis and osteopenia, respectively, at time of TKA. The 8-year cumulative incidence of secondary FF and periprosthetic fracture was significantly higher in those with a prior FF (27.5% secondary FF and 1.9% PPF) when compared to those without (9.1% secondary FF and 0.7% PPF). After adjusting for covariates, patients with a recent FF had significantly higher risks of secondary FF (HR 2.73; p < 0.001) and periprosthetic fracture (HR 1.86; p < 0.001) than those without a recent FF.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent FF before TKA is associated with increased risk for additional FF and PPF within 8 years following TKA. Surgeons should ensure appropriate management of fragility fracture is undertaken prior to TKA to minimize fracture risk, and if not, be vigilant to identify patients with prior FF or other bone health risk factors who may have undocumented osteoporosis.

Periprosthetic fractures: an unrecognized osteoporosis crisis

Total joint replacement is common and increasing. Many of these patients have low bone mineral density preoperatively, and arthroplasty leads to bone loss. As falls are common before and after arthroplasty, it is unsurprising that periprosthetic fractures, defined as those associated with an orthopedic device, whether a joint replacement or other internal fixation devices, are not rare. These fractures engender morbidity and mortality comparable to osteoporosis-related hip fractures but remain largely unrecognized and untreated by osteoporosis/metabolic bone disease clinicians. Indeed, recent osteoporosis guidelines are silent regarding periprosthetic fractures. The purposes of this clinical review are to briefly describe the epidemiology of arthroplasty procedures and periprosthetic fractures, raise awareness that these fractures are osteoporosis-related, and suggest approaches likely to reduce their occurrence. Notably, bone health evaluation is essential following the occurrence of a periprosthetic fracture to reduce subsequent fracture risk. Importantly, in addition to such secondary fracture prevention, primary prevention, i.e., bone health assessment and optimization prior to elective orthopedic procedures, is appropriate.

Proposed bone health screening protocol to identify total knee arthroplasty patients for preoperative DXA

This study evaluates a novel, simple bone health screening protocol composed of patient sex, age, fracture history, and FRAX risk to identify total knee arthroplasty patients for preoperative DXA. Findings supported effectiveness, with sensitivity of 1.00 (CI 0.92-1.00) and specificity of 0.54 (CI 0.41-0.68) when evaluating for clinical osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

Bone health optimization is a process where osteoporotic patients are identified, evaluated via modalities such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and treated when indicated. There are currently no established guidelines to determine who needs presurgical DXA. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a simple screening protocol to identify TKA patients for preoperative DXA.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study began on September 1, 2019, and included 100 elective TKA patients. Inclusion criteria were ≥ 50 years and primary TKA. All patients obtained routine clinical DXA. The screening protocol defining who should obtain DXA included meeting any of the following: female ≥ 65, male ≥ 70, fracture history after age 50, or FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk without bone mineral density (BMD) adjustments ≥ 8.4%. Osteoporosis was defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (T-score ≤  - 2.5) or clinically (T-score ≤  - 2.5, elevated BMD-adjusted FRAX risk, or prior hip/spine fracture). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated.

RESULTS

The study included 68 females and 32 males, mean age 67.2 ± 7.7. T-score osteoporosis was observed in 16 patients while 43 had clinical osteoporosis. Screening criteria recommending DXA was met by 69 patients. Screening sensitivity was 1.00 (CI 0.79-1.00) and specificity was 0.37 (CI 0.27-0.48) for identifying patients with T-score osteoporosis. Similar sensitivity of 1.00 (CI 0.92-1.00) and specificity of 0.54 (CI 0.41-0.68) were found for clinical osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple screening protocol identifies TKA patients with T-score and clinical osteoporosis for preoperative DXA with high sensitivity in this prospective cohort study.