Hospital Readmissions After Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Updated Analysis and Implications for Value-Based Care

Distinct Care Needs and Episodes of Care: Comparing Medical versus Orthopaedic Readmissions after Elective Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

Hospital readmissions after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) significantly drive health care expenditure and resource utilization. Recent studies have suggested differences between medical and orthopaedic readmissions after TKA and their episodes of care (EOCs) but lack patient-level data reporting. This study aimed to compare EOCs for medical and orthopaedic-related readmissions regarding initial readmission wards, services consulted, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, blood transfusions, surgical interventions, length of stay, and discharge disposition.All patients enrolled in a prospective data collection system at a tertiary medical center undergoing elective, unilateral, primary TKA from 2016 to 2020 and readmitted within 90 days of discharge were included. Readmissions were categorized as related to medical or orthopaedic causes. Patients' electronic medical records were reviewed to collect demographic and clinical information about EOC associated with the readmission hospital course.In total, 82.4% (580/704) of 90-day readmissions after elective, primary TKA were related to medical causes, with the remaining 17.6% (124/704) of readmissions due to orthopaedic causes. Medical readmissions most often pertained to gastrointestinal complaints, while wound complications accounted for most orthopaedic readmissions. Most readmissions (63.1%, 444/704) occurred within the first 30 days after TKA. Patients with medical and orthopaedic readmissions had differences in EOC, such that more medical readmissions required ICU care (10.6 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001), and more patients with orthopaedic readmissions needed a surgical intervention (65.4 vs. 6.7%, p < 0.001).By understanding differences in EOC for medical and orthopaedic readmissions after TKA, targeted initiatives can be developed to deliver more efficient, cost-effective orthopaedic surgical care, as the orthopaedic surgical community continues to provide value-based care.

Outcomes of Obese Patients Undergoing Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Trends Over 30 Years

BACKGROUND

The rates of obesity among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have substantially increased. In addition, obesity is a well-established risk factor for complications after TKA. The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in body mass index (BMI) and complication risk among obese patients undergoing primary TKA treated at a single institution over 3 decades.

METHODS

Utilizing an institutional total joint registry, 13,919 primary TKAs performed to treat osteoarthritis between 1990 and 2019 were identified. Patients were stratified by BMI according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification into 3 groups: non-obese (BMI, <30 kg/m 2 ), WHO Class-I and II obese (BMI, 30 to 39.9 kg/m 2 ), and WHO Class-III obese (BMI, ≥40 kg/m 2 ). Trends in BMI and survivorship free from reoperation, revision, and periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) were analyzed over time while controlling for age, sex, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

Over the study period, there was a 90% increase in the prevalence of Class-II obesity (13% to 25%) and a 300% increase in Class-III obesity (3% to 12%). Analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated a decrease in the 2-year risk of any reoperation, any revision, and PJI (p < 0.05 for all) with time. The risk decreased significantly over time for non-obese patients for any reoperation (p = 0.029) and any revision (p = 0.004) and for Class-III obese patients for any reoperation (p = 0.038) and any revision (p = 0.012), but it remained stable for Class-I and II obese patients. The risk of PJI decreased from 1990 to 2019 for non-obese patients (p = 0.005), but there were no significant changes in PJI risk for any obesity group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite increasing rates of obesity among our patients who underwent TKA, we observed decreasing risks of reoperation, revision, and PJI over time. The risks of reoperation and revision declined among non-obese patients, remained stable for Class-I and II obese patients, and declined for Class-III obese patients. The PJI risk declined for non-obese patients over the study period, but no such decline occurred for any category of obesity. Despite the decreasing risks of reoperation and revision, further work is needed to improve PJI risk in obese patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Scaled TelePhysical Therapy Program a Promising Option for Post-acute Care of Lower-Extremity Arthroplasty Patients

Background

Post-acute care for orthopedic surgery patients continues to evolve with the reduction in hospital length of stay (LOS), shift to ambulatory surgery, increased number of surgeries, and focus on value-based care.

Purpose

We sought to examine outcomes of a cohort of lower-extremity arthroplasty patients receiving telephysical therapy (TelePT) according to hospital LOS, as a means of exploring the viability of TelePT as a value-based discharge option.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted of patients who participated in our institution's HSS@Home TelePT program after undergoing primary unilateral hip or knee arthroplasty, unicondylar knee replacement, or hip resurfacing. Demographic data and outcomes such as hospital LOS, number of days between discharge and TelePT evaluation, number of TelePT visits, number of re-admissions, Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome (HOOS Jr.) or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS Jr.) scores, and patient satisfaction scores were collected. Patients were divided into categories based on hospital LOS to help determine the versatility of program.

Results

In the 2814 patients included, we observed an average of 4.1 TelePT visits; 1% of patients were readmitted within 90 days, and 97% of patients were satisfied or highly satisfied. There was no difference in HOOS or KOOS Jr. scores at each follow-up time point, except for the 6-month HOOS Jr. scores.

Conclusion

This retrospective study suggests that TelePT may be a viable option for care of lower-extremity arthroplasty patients in the post-acute setting, regardless of hospital LOS. As a discharge option, it may meet the needs of select patients to fill a gap in providing value-based care.