Coronal Laxity at Flexion is Larger After Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Than With Cruciate-Retaining Procedures

Effect of tibia-first, restricted functional alignment technique on gap width changes, and component positioning in robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study aims to quantitatively assess the predictability of post-resection gap dimensions and the attainment of balanced gaps using robotic arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent robotic arm-assisted TKA for knee osteoarthritis using a restricted functional alignment (FA) technique. Tibial cuts were performed based on preoperative tibial anatomy within predefined boundaries, followed by femoral component adjustments according to tensioned soft tissues to optimise gap balance. The primary outcome was the proportion of balanced gaps, defined as differential laxities of ≤2 mm, across extension, flexion, lateral, and medial gap measurements. Ligament balancing in lateral and medial compartments was assessed using a robotic system at 10° and 90° flexion to evaluate if restricted FA facilitated a balanced knee. Secondary outcomes included implant alignment, resection depth, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

RESULTS

Significant increases in both lateral and medial gaps at 10° and 90° flexion were observed following tibial and femoral bone resections (p < 0.001). At extension, average gap changes were 0.9 mm (lateral) and 1.6 mm (medial) after tibial cuts, and 0.5 mm (lateral) and 1.2 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. At 90° flexion, changes were 0.3 mm (lateral) and 1.7 mm (medial) following tibial cuts, and 1.0 mm (lateral) and 1.4 mm (medial) after femoral cuts. Despite these variations, the tibia-first, gap-balancing technique achieved overall balance in 98% of gap measurements. The tibial component was placed at an average of 2.1° varus, while the femoral component was positioned at 0.3° varus and 1.3° external rotation relative to the surgical transepicondylar axis. Significant improvements in PROMs were noted between preoperative and one-year postoperative evaluations (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The tibia-first, restricted FA technique achieved a well-balanced knee in 98% of cases, despite inconsistent gap increments observed between initial assessments and post-resection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Intraoperative lateral laxity greater than 4° is associated with inferior functional improvement in posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The study aimed to determine the impact of intraoperative lateral laxity at extension on clinical and functional outcomes 1 year after posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA).

METHODS

In total, 91 varus-type osteoarthritic knees that underwent PS-TKA using the medial preservation gap technique were included. After the femoral trial component placement and patellofemoral joint reduction, the soft-tissue balance was assessed using an offset-type tensor with a 40-lb joint-distraction force. Patients were divided into the following three groups according to the intraoperative lateral laxity at extension (i.e., varus ligament balance) using the mean ± 1 standard deviation: Groups A, ≤0°; B, 0-4°; and C, >4°. The 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) and 3-m timed up-and-go test (TUG) time 1-year postoperatively, and their improvements were compared among the groups.

RESULTS

While significant improvements were observed in all subscales of the 2011 KSS and TUG post-TKA (p < 0.05), the improvement of functional activities and TUG time were significantly lower in Group C than in Group B (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in symptom improvement, patient satisfaction or patient expectation scores among the groups.

CONCLUSION

An excessive lateral laxity (varus angle) >4° at extension was associated with lower improvement in functional ability 1-year postoperatively. Therefore, excessive intraoperative lateral laxity should be avoided in PS-TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Large angular correction of arithmetic coronal alignment is associated with residual lateral laxity after total knee arthroplasty in varus knees for Japanese patients

Purpose

One of the most common types of coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) is type I, which is characterised by varus alignment and apex distal joint line obliquity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association of changes in arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) with both postoperative joint laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients with CPAK type I following mechanical alignment (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Of 111 consecutive knees in 92 patients with osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA, 80 knees (72.0%) with CPAK type I phenotype preoperatively were evaluated. All TKAs were performed to achieve neutral MA by a medial stabilising gap balancing technique. Pre- to postoperative change in aHKA was defined as ΔaHKA. The 80 CPAK type I knees were divided into a larger ΔaHKA group (>7°) and a smaller ΔaHKA group (≤7°). PROMs, including the Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score-12, were assessed before and 2 years after surgery. Pre- and postoperative joint laxity was assessed using a Telos arthrometer.

Results

Twenty-two knees showed a larger ΔaHKA, and postoperative lateral joint laxity in varus stress was significantly greater in these patients than in those with a smaller ΔaHKA (6.8° vs. 4.5°, p = 0.006). There were no significant differences between the groups in PROMs (p = n.s.).

Conclusions

Postoperative lateral laxity was associated with larger aHKA changes than smaller aHKA changes in CPAK type I knees after TKA. However, no statistically significant differences in PROMs were found according to the amount of change in aHKA.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Morphology and transverse alignment of the patella have no effect on knee gait characteristics in healthy Chinese adults over the age of 40 years

Background: The influence of patella morphology and horizontal alignment on knee joint kinematics and kinetics remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess patella morphology and transverse alignment in relation to knee kinetics and kinematics in individuals without knee conditions. A secondary objective was to investigate the impact of femur and tibia alignment and shape on knee gait within this population. Patients and methods: We conducted a prospective collection of data, including full-leg anteroposterior and skyline X-ray views and three-dimensional gait data, from a cohort comprising 54 healthy individuals aged 40 years and older. Our study involved correlation and logistic regression analyses to examine the influence of patella, femur, and tibia morphology and alignment on knee gait. Results: The patellar tilt angle or the patella index did not show any significant relationships with different aspects of gait in the knee joint, such as velocity, angle, or moment (p > 0.05, respectively). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, we found that the tibiofemoral angle and the Q angle both had a significant effect on the adduction angle (OR = 1.330, 95%CI 1.033-1.711, p = 0.027; OR = 0.475, 95%CI 0.285-0.792, p = 0.04; respectively). The primary variable influencing the knee adduction moment was the tibiofemoral angle (OR = 1.526, 95% CI 1.125-2.069, p = 0.007). Conclusion: In healthy Chinese individuals aged over 40, patella morphology and transverse alignment do not impact knee gait. However, the femoral-tibial angle has a big impact on the knee adduction moment.