Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Comparative Rates of Transient Neurological Symptoms and Urinary Retention using Lidocaine, Mepivacaine, and Bupivacaine

Mepivacaine versus bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for return of motor function following total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Demand for same-day discharge pathways and early ambulation following knee arthroplasty continues to increase. While spinal anesthesia with mepivacaine versus bupivacaine may promote return of motor function and ambulation, there are limited randomized trials evaluating this in knee arthroplasty patients. This study hypothesized that spinal mepivacaine would result in earlier return of motor function, promoting ambulation and same-day discharge.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (n=163) were enrolled and randomized patients to mepivacaine (60 mg) or isobaric bupivacaine (10 mg) for spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was time to return of motor function. Additional outcomes included time to first ambulation, distance at first ambulation, same-day discharge rate, length of stay, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and side effects.

RESULTS

Patients receiving a mepivacaine spinal anesthetic had faster median (95% CI) time to return of motor function, (210 min (200, 216) vs 229 (223, 237) min, p<0.001) and lower rates of urinary retention (36% vs 57%, p=0.007). Mepivacaine patients exhibited higher pain scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (32.4 vs 9.5 mm, p<0.001) but no differences at 6, 24, or 48 hours postoperative. Opioid consumption did not differ at any time point (p=0.769). There were no differences in time to first ambulation, distance at first ambulation, same-day discharge rate, length of stay, nausea, vomiting, pruritus, or transient neurological symptoms between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mepivacaine expedited return of motor function after knee arthroplasty, a clinically relevant 20% reduction was not observed. Ambulation times and same-day discharge rates did not differ.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05765682.

Multimodal Analgesia and Small Opioid Prescriptions are the New Standard in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Membership

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this survey study was to assess the current analgesia and anesthesia practices used by total joint arthroplasty surgeon members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) as well as identify changes in practice made by AAHKS members over time.

METHODS

A survey of 37 questions was created and approved by the AAHKS Research Committee. The survey was distributed to all 3,243 practicing adult reconstruction surgeon members of AAHKS in May 2023. Results were compared to a nearly identical survey sent out to all board-certified adult reconstruction surgeon members of AAHKS 5 years previously in November 2018.

RESULTS

There were 527 responses (16%) to the survey. Since 2018, the mean number of opioid pills prescribed after total joint arthroplasty has declined significantly from 49 to 32 pills after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and from 44 to 18 pills after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The use of multimodal analgesics in addition to opioids has also increased over the past 5 years from 74 to 93%. The most common medications utilized include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (98%), acetaminophen (80%), and gabapentinoids (32%). A majority of surgeons (78%) still use a spinal for TKA and THA. However, there has been an increase in the number of surgeons using peripheral nerve blocks for TKA from 69% in 2018 to 84% in 2023. The routine use of periarticular injection or local infiltration anesthesia in THA and TKA has also increased over the past 5 years from 80 to 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Since 2018, there has been increased adoption of multimodal analgesia and anesthesia, and improved consensus regarding the optimal regimen among surveyed arthroplasty surgeon members of AAHKS. The number of opioid pills prescribed after THA and TKA has declined significantly over the past 5 years.

Anesthesia Management of Hip Fracture Surgery in Geriatric Patients: A Review

Hip fractures are increasingly prominent concerns in healthcare, especially in light of a growing elderly population. These fractures contribute to mortality and morbidity in the elderly. Many hip fractures require emergent surgical intervention and may have consequences of serious postoperative complications. Multidisciplinary approaches of management have been utilized to optimize care and improve patient outcomes. Due to the myriad of multi-organ system comorbidities that are increasingly prevalent in the geriatric population, anesthetic management proves to be difficult to standardize. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have shown benefits for optimizing patient outcomes by focusing on premedication, nutritional support, and pain management; however, specific anesthetic management techniques are not discussed. This literature review aims to discuss ways to optimize hip fracture management in geriatric patients through effective preoperative evaluation, anesthetic considerations, and postoperative optimization and care. A review of currently available guidelines may help determine the optimal management for hip fractures in geriatric patients and improve immediate and lasting postoperative outcomes.

Advanced Concepts in Outpatient Joint Arthroplasty

As the adoption and utilization of outpatient total joint arthroplasty continues to grow, key developments have enabled surgeons to safely and effectively perform these surgeries while increasing patient satisfaction and operating room efficiency. Here, the authors will discuss the evidence-based principles that have guided this paradigm shift in joint arthroplasty surgery, as well as practical methods for selecting appropriate candidates and optimizing perioperative care. There will be 5 core efficiency principles reviewed that can be used to improve organizational management, streamline workflow, and overcome barriers in the ambulatory surgery center. Finally, future directions in outpatient surgery at the ASC, including the merits of implementing robot assistance and computer navigation, as well as expanding indications for revision surgeries, will be debated.

The Safety of Peripheral Nerve Blocks: The Role of Triple Monitoring in Regional Anaesthesia, a Comprehensive Review

Regional anaesthesia, referred to as regional blocks, is one of the most frequently used methods of anaesthesia for surgery and for pain management. Local anaesthetic drug should be administered as close to the nerve as possible. If administered too far away, this may result in insufficient block. If it is administrated too close, severe nerve damage can occur. Neurostimulation techniques and ultrasound imaging have improved the effectiveness and safety of blockade, but the risk of nerve injury with permanent nerve disfunction has not been eliminated. Intraneural administration of a local anaesthetic damages the nerve mechanically by the needle and the high pressure generated by the drug inside the nerve. In many studies, injection pressure is described as significantly higher for unintended intraneural injections than for perineural ones. In recent years, the concept of combining techniques (neurostimulation + USG imaging + injection pressure monitoring) has emerged as a method increasing safety and efficiency in regional anaesthesia. This study focuses on the contribution of nerve identification methods to improve the safety of peripheral nerve blocks by reducing the risk of neural damage.

The Assessment of Marcaine Versus Meperidine for Spinal Anesthesia in Anorectal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

Spinal anesthesia (SA) for the surgical management of chronic anal fissures is favored by surgeons as it provides an early return to daily activities; however, the agents applied for SA to achieve the best outcomes with minimized adverse effects are a matter of debate.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the utility of Marcaine versus meperidine for SA induction of anoderm surgery.

Methods

This randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted on 138 patients with chronic anal fissures who were candidates for surgical management in 2020. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups of SA using 2.5 mL of hyperbaric Marcaine 0.5% (n = 69) or 1 mg/kg of meperidine (n = 69). Pain severity (measured via Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)), anal sphincter tone manometry (measured at baseline and the end of the sphincterotomy), and drug-related adverse effects were compared between the groups.

Results

Both agents led to significant pain relief within 24 hours after SA (P < 0.05); nevertheless, pain severity was remarkably lower in meperidine-treated patients in different measurements performed during the first 24 hours after SA (P < 0.05). The sphincteric tone significantly decreased in both groups (P < 0.001), while the postoperative tone was significantly less in the Marcaine-treated patients (65.22 ± 3.02 versus 46.04 ± 1.97, P < 0.001). The two groups did not differ regarding the adverse effects (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Meperidine for SA in anal fissure surgical management was relatively superior to Marcaine, as postoperative pain control was remarkably better achieved with meperidine. However, anal sphincter tone reached a normal range in Marcaine-treated cases, and the average tone in those anesthetized with meperidine was slightly above the normal limits.