Visualization of the extra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon during intra-articular shoulder arthroscopy

All-Arthroscopic Falciform Portal Biceps Tenodesis

Biceps tenodesis has been proven to be an effective treatment for biceps tendon and superior labral pathology. Many techniques including both open and arthroscopic approaches have been reported. Open techniques afford management of the entire proximal biceps tendon but are limited by wound healing issues, increased bleeding, and increased surgical time. Arthroscopic tenodesis offers benefits in terms of surgical efficiency, cosmesis, and bleeding risk. However, standard arthroscopic tenodesis only addresses intra-articular biceps pathology. In this report we describe an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis technique at the suprapectoral region of the humerus using knotless suture anchor fixation.

The long head of biceps at the shoulder: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

This review aimed to explore the available literature to update our understanding of the long head of biceps (LHB) at the shoulder. Synthesise our findings to identify emergent themes and knowledge gaps to inform future research and management directions.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, SportDiscus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 31st December 2021. Articles were included if they referenced adult participants > 18 years of age and were written in English.

RESULTS

214 articles were included in the final analysis, and results were categorised into six emergent themes: (1) Anatomy - Normal anatomical variation of the biceps from aberrant origins, third and fourth accessory heads, and an absence of the LHB tendon (LHBT) are not necessarily benign, with shoulder pain and instability a commonly reported theme. (2) Function - Bicep's role in glenohumeral elevation and stability in healthy shoulders is minimal. In contrast, LHB has a more significant role in shoulder stability and humeral head depression in subjects with rotator cuff failure or an absent LHBT. (3) Pathology - There is an association between LHB tendinopathy, rotator cuff disease, LHBT instability and occult rotator cuff tears. Early recruitment and hyperactivity of the LHB in subjects with symptomatic rotator cuff tears and instability suggest a potential compensatory role. (4) Assessment - The limited diagnostic utility of special orthopaedic tests in assessing LHBT pathology was a consistent theme. The utility of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to identify full-thickness tendon tears and instability of the LHBT was moderate to high. However, the utility of clinical tests and imaging may be underestimated due to arthroscopy's limitations in fully visualising the proximal LHBT. (5) Non-Surgical Management - Ultrasound-guided injections into the biceps sheath show greater accuracy and patient outcomes than blinded injections; however, the entry of injectate into the intraarticular glenohumeral joint may have unwanted complications. (6) Surgical management - For the surgical management of biceps pathology with or without rotator cuff pathology, both biceps tenodesis and tenotomy report similar improvements in pain without any significant adverse effect on strength or function. Tenodesis favoured higher overall constant scores and a lower incidence of Popeye deformity and cramping arm pain, with tenotomy trending to be more cost and time effective. For patients with a healthy LHBT, rotator cuff repair with adjunctive tenodesis or tenotomy fails to provide additional clinical improvements compared to rotator cuff repair in isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoping review highlights the variability of biceps anatomy, which is not necessarily benign and suggests a minimal role of the LHB in shoulder elevation and stability in healthy individuals. In contrast, individuals with rotator cuff tears experience proximal humeral migration and demonstrate hyperactivity of the LHB, suggesting a potential compensation role. The observed prevalence of LHBT pathology with rotator cuff tears is well established; however, the cause-and-effect relationship between LHBT pathology and rotator cuff disease is undetermined. The diagnostic utility of clinical tests and imaging to exclude LHBT pathology may be understated due to the limitations of arthroscopy to visualise the proximal LHBT fully. Rehabilitation programs for the LHB are understudied. Similar post-surgical clinical outcomes are observed for tenodesis and tenotomy for biceps and rotator cuff-related shoulder pain. Subjects undergoing biceps tenodesis are less likely to have cramping arm pain and a Popeye deformity than patients undergoing biceps tenotomy. The significance of routine surgical removal of the LHBT and sequelae on rotator cuff tear progression to failure and long-term shoulder function is unknown, and further research is required.

PRE-REGISTRATION

OSF: https://osf.io/erh9m.

Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis: The Best of Both Worlds

Biceps tendinopathy and superior labrum anterior posterior lesions are a common source of shoulder pain and disability and can be effectively treated with biceps tenodesis. There are a variety of open and arthroscopic tenodesis techniques, but no one technique has demonstrated superiority. Arthroscopic techniques often disregard the extra-articular portions of the biceps tendon as a potential source of pain. Open techniques address this concern; however, they can be associated with wound complications, increased blood loss, nerve injury, and disruptions to surgical workflow. Here, we describe an all arthroscopic tenodesis technique at the suprapectoral zone of the tendon. This method addresses extra-articular sources of pain, while limiting the potential pitfalls of open surgery.

The role of elbow positioning on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon in the beach chair position

Background

Tendinopathy of the long head of biceps (LHB) tendon is a common cause of anterior shoulder pain and dysfunction. The extra‐articular portion within the bicipital groove undergoes frequent load and friction during shoulder movements and pathology within this area is frequently missed during arthroscopic assessment.

Methods

We quantified the arthroscopically assessable length of tendon within the shoulder in 14 consecutive patients undergoing subpectoral biceps tenodesis. After biceps tenotomy at the superior labrum, the tagged tendon was maximally tensioned and marked at the biceps outlet with the elbow in extension and flexion. The distance in distance between the two were measured.

Results

Mean distance from the superior labral insertion of the biceps to the outlet was 16.4 ± 4.1 mm (range, 11–25). With tension on the biceps with elbow extension, the mean measurable distance was 31.3 ± 6.7 mm (range, 19–45). With elbow flexion, this increased to 39.5 ± 5.9 mm (range, 25–52). Mean increase in visible tendon length was 8.2 ± 4.3 mm (range, 5–21) (p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Elbow flexion results in an average increase of 26.2% more extra‐articular tendon visualized at arthroscopy. Therefore, we believe that elbow flexion is a useful adjunct, especially when performed in conjunction with techniques that pull the tendon into the joint, thus allowing for more complete arthroscopic assessment of the LHB, increasing detection of symptomatic biceps tendonitis.

Level of evidence: Level IV.

Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for partial tears of the long head of the biceps tendon in patients with rotator cuff tears

Background

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful for diagnosing shoulder diseases preoperatively. However, detection of partial tears of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) using current clinical tests and imaging modalities is difficult. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of radial-slice MRI for diagnosing partial tears of the LHBT. We hypothesized that radial-slice MRI may be a valuable diagnostic tool for assessing diagnosing tears of the LHBT.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated 118 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy for rotator cuff tears. Intraoperative LHBT findings were compared with the identification of partial tears of the LHBT on conventional-slice MRI and radial-slice MRI, using a 3.0-T system. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for the detection of LHBT tears. Inter- and intraobserver reliability for radial-slice MRI was calculated using kappa statistics.

Results

We diagnosed 69 patients (58%) without any LHBT tears and 49 with partial tears (42%), arthroscopically. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of conventional-slice MRI for detection of partial tears of the LHBT were 52%, 94%, 78%, 92%, and 58%, respectively. Radial-slice MRI had 84% sensitivity, 90% specificity, 86% accuracy, and 92% positive and 80% negative predictive values for partial tears of the LHBT. Inter- and intraobserver reliability for radial-slice MRI was 0.69 and 0.74, respectively, corresponding to high reproducibility and defined as good.

Conclusion

Radial-slice MRI demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than conventional-slice MRI. These results indicate that radial-slice MRI is useful for diagnosing LHBT partial tears.

Arthroscopic Evaluation of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: Traditional Versus Allis Clamp Techniques

Using a probe to retract the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) into the joint is common practice for visualizing the extra-articular portions during arthroscopy. However, extra-articular lesions may be missed in up to half of cases. Greater excursion of the LHBT may be achieved with an Allis clamp grasper. Our goal was to quantify portions of the extra-articular LHBT that could be visualized during shoulder arthroscopy with the Allis clamp and probe techniques. Shoulder arthroscopy was performed on 8 forequarter cadaveric specimens in the simulated beach chair position, and the most distal extent of the intra-articular LHBT was marked. The tendon was pulled into the joint with both techniques, and the additional exposed tendon portion was marked. An open approach was performed, and the locations of the 3 marks were assessed relative to total tendon length. Mean LHBT total length was 96.25 mm. Diagnostic arthroscopy allowed visualization of a mean of 21.75 mm of the intra-articular tendon (22.6% of the total length). The traditional probe technique provided visualization of 31.13 mm (32.8%). The Allis clamp technique provided visualization of 49.38 mm (52%) and increased visualization of the LHBT by 58.6% (P<.0001). A mean of 46.87 mm (48%) of the LHBT remained unvisualized. The Allis clamp technique maximizes arthroscopic visualization of extra-articular LHBT. The distal 48% eludes evaluation, but can be visualized when combined with an open technique without the need to divide the transverse humeral ligament. The Allis clamp technique facilitates additional identification of LHBT pathology that could otherwise remain hidden during shoulder arthroscopy. Because the LHBT is a major source of pain in the shoulder, this technique may improve outcomes of shoulder arthroscopy and reduce the need for revision because of remnant anterior shoulder pain. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(1):38-42.].

Ultrasound-Guided Biceps Tendon Sheath Injections Frequently Extravasate Into the Glenohumeral Joint

PURPOSE

To evaluate the frequency of glenohumeral joint extravasation of ultrasound (US)-guided biceps tendon sheath injections.

METHODS

Fifty shoulders with a clinical diagnosis of bicipital tenosynovitis pain received a US-guided biceps sheath injection with anesthetic, steroid, and contrast (5.0 mL mixture) followed immediately by orthogonal radiographs to localize the anatomic distribution of the injection. Radiographic evaluation of contrast localization was determined and interobserver reliability calculated.

RESULTS

All 50 postinjection radiographs (100%) demonstrated contrast within the biceps tendon sheath. In addition, 30 of 50 (60%) radiographs also revealed contrast in the glenohumeral joint. Interobserver reliability for determination of intraarticular contrast was good (kappa value 0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided bicipital sheath injections reproducibly result in intrasheath placement of injection fluid. Bicipital sheath injections performed with 5 mL of volume result in partial extravasation into the joint 60% of the time. These data may be useful for surgeons who use the results of diagnostic biceps injections for diagnosis and surgical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, prospective cohort study, diagnosis.

[Injuries of the biceps-labrum complex : Principles, pathologies and treatment concepts]

BACKGROUND

The biceps-labrum complex is prone to acute lesions and degenerative changes due to its anatomical structure and the high load it has to endure. Pathological changes of these structures are common pain generators and can significantly impair shoulder function. Anatomically, the biceps-labrum complex can be divided into three zones: inside, junction and bicipital tunnel.

DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE

Despite the focused physical examination and advancements in imaging techniques, the exact localization of pathologies remains challenging. Arthroscopy can be used to accurately diagnose inside and junctional pathologies but extra-articular changes in the region of the bicipital tunnel can only be partially visualized.

TREATMENT

In cases of unsuccessful conservative treatment and correct indications, a high level of patient satisfaction can be surgically achieved. In young patients an anatomical reconstruction of inside lesions or tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon is performed; however, even tenotomy is a valuable option and can achieve equally satisfactory results. Unaddressed pathological changes of the bicipital tunnel can lead to persistence of pain. In clinical procedures performing tenodesis, both the different techniques and the implants used have been found to show similar results. This article describes the anatomical principles, pathological changes, the focused clinical instrumental diagnostics and discusses the different treatment philosophies as well as the outcome according to the recent literature.

Small-incision open distal subpectoral vs. arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis for biceps long head tendon lesions with repair of rotator cuff tears

The curative effect of small-incision open distal subpectoral vs. arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis for lesions in the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) combined with rotator cuff repairs (RCR) has remained controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare the two surgical methods. A total of 71 patients who received surgical treatment for LHBT lesions accompanied by RC tears were analyzed. Following arthroscopic RCR and tendectomy of the affected LHBT, 35 patients underwent small-incision open distal subpectoral tenodesis through a small incision (the subpectoral group), while the remaining 36 patients received arthroscopic proximal tenodesis (the arthroscopic group). The surgery time and intra-operative blood loss were compared between the two groups. In addition, the clinical outcomes were evaluated using scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder joint. The subpectoral group had a shorter surgery time and less intra-operative blood loss than the arthroscopic group (P<0.05). The functional scores of the two groups significantly improved as time passed (P<0.05). The subpectoral group was significantly superior to the arthroscopic group with regard to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score at 2 weeks post-operatively and visual analog scale score at 2 weeks and 3 months post-operatively (P<0.05). Small-incision open distal subpectoral and arthroscopic proximal tenodesis were demonstrated to effectively improve the function of the shoulder joint and relieve pain caused by LHBT lesions accompanied by RCR. However, small-incision open distal subpectoral tenodesis had the additional advantage of shorter surgery time, less intra-operative bleeding and encouraging early results compared to arthroscopic proximal tenodesis. The study was registered as a clinical trial in the Chinese Trial Registry (no. ChiCTR1800015643).

Magnetic resonance arthrography is insufficiently accurate to diagnose biceps lesions prior to rotator cuff repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy between magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) and arthroscopic examination for the assessment of pathologies of the long head of the biceps (LHB) prior to rotator cuff (RC) repair. The hypothesis was that MRA is suitable to identify biceps instabilities, due to improved visibility of the biceps pulley.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients aged 58.5 ± 17.6 (range, 46-71) scheduled to have RC repair between 2016 and 2017 were prospectively enrolled. MRA images of the LHB were interpreted by one radiologist and two surgeons, then compared to arthroscopic findings. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by comparing MRA axial readings to arthroscopic assessment in the neutral position (static instability), MRA sagittal readings to arthroscopic assessment in external rotation (dynamic s instability), MRA coronal and axial readings to arthroscopic assessment in the neutral position (tendinopathy).

RESULTS

Among the three observers, the radiologist obtained the highest sensitivity and specificity for MRA, which were respectively: (1) for static instability, 62% (C.I. 35-85) and 77% (C.I. 63-88); (2) for dynamic instability, 50% (C.I. 29-71) and 62% (C.I. 46-77), and (3) for tendinopathy, 49% (C.I. 36-62) and 100% (C.I. 3-100).

CONCLUSIONS

MRA is not suitable for the diagnosis of LHB lesions prior to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level I.

Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detection of tears and instability of proximal long head of biceps tendon: an evaluation of 100 shoulders compared with arthroscopy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of instability and tears of the proximal long head of biceps tendon (LHBT). To assess intraobserver and interobserver agreement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 100 consecutive shoulders who underwent non-contrast 1.5-T MRI prior to arthroscopic surgery due to rotator cuff injury. Images were independently analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. LHBT was evaluated for presence of tearing (intact, longitudinal split, partial-thickness, or full-thickness) and position (normal, subluxated, and dislocated). Anterosuperior rotator cuff tears were also assessed. The reference standard was arthroscopic surgery. The ramp test was performed in order to evaluate LHBT stability. Diagnostic performance measures were determined and Kappa coefficients assessed agreement.

RESULTS

Concerning the detection of overall tears, sensitivity ranged from 71 to 73% and specificity was 73%. The specificity for full-thickness tears ranged from 75 to 96%. Overall displacement showed sensitivity ranging from 51 to 58% and specificity ranging from 70 to 86%. The specificity of overall displacement combined with anterosuperior rotator cuff tears ranged from 73 to 91%. Interobserver Kappa values were between 0.59 and 0.69. Intraobserver Kappa values were between 0.74 and 0.82.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI has moderate accuracy and good agreement for detection of LHBT tears and instability. There is a tendency for increased specificity for full-thickness tears and for instability in the coexistence of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears.

Injuries of the Biceps and Superior Labral Complex in Overhead Athletes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the current anatomy, biomechanics, presentation, treatment, and outcomes of injuries to the biceps and superior labral complex in overhead athletes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The biceps and superior labral complex is composed of anatomically distinct zones. The inability to accurately diagnose biceps lesions contributes to continued morbidity especially as arthroscopy and advanced imaging fail to fully evaluate the entire course of the biceps tendon. Superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) repair, long head of biceps tenodesis, and tenotomy are the most common operative techniques for surgical treatment of biceps-labral complex (BLC) pathology. Labral repair in overhead athletes has resulted in mixed outcomes for athletes and is best indicated for patients under age 40 years old. Injuries to the BLC are potentially challenging injuries to diagnose and treat, particularly in the overhead athlete. SLAP repair remains the treatment of choice for high-level overhead athletes and patients younger than 40 years of age, while biceps tenodesis and tenotomy are preferred for older patients.

Tenodesis renders better results than tenotomy in repairs of isolated supraspinatus tears with pathologic biceps

BACKGROUND

Many authors recommend systematic biceps tenotomy or tenodesis when repairing rotator cuff tears, regardless of whether the biceps is normal or pathologic. The purpose of this study was to determine whether 10-year outcomes of repairs of isolated supraspinatus tears are influenced by adjuvant biceps tenodesis or tenotomy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent repair of isolated supraspinatus tears were recalled for evaluation at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. A total of 249 patients (51% men) aged 56.7 ± 6.3 years were evaluated clinically (Constant score), of whom 182 were also evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging (Sugaya classification). The biceps was intraoperatively found to be pathologic in 52% of shoulders, of which 39% had a tenotomy and 54% had a tenodesis; it was found to be normal in 48% of shoulders, of which 88% were left intact.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in Constant scores for patients who had normal biceps without adjuvant procedures (77.1 ± 11.7) compared with patients who had pathologic biceps with either tenodesis (79.8 ± 11.5, P = .104) or tenotomy (75.3 ± 10.7, P = .420). However, for patients who had pathologic biceps, Constant scores were significantly better for those with tenodesis compared with those with tenotomy (P = .025). Multivariable regression revealed Constant scores to be significantly lower for women, as well as patients with fatty infiltration of stages 1 and 2, but significantly higher for patients who underwent tenodesis.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant biceps procedures are not required when repairing isolated supraspinatus tears, unless biceps pathology is observed intraoperatively, for which tenodesis grants better function and strength than tenotomy.

Editorial Commentary: Thank You, Thank You, Thank You… for Demonstrating Histologic Evidence of Shoulder Bicipital Tunnel Disease in the Absence of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings

Bicipital tunnel disease is often unvisualized during standard diagnostic arthroscopy. Histolopathologic evidence of disease may be present even in the absence of magnetic resonance imaging findings. Surgical decision making is multifactorial.

Management of Biceps Tendon Pathology: From the Glenoid to the Radial Tuberosity

Management of proximal and distal biceps tendon pathology is evolving. The long head of the biceps tendon, if inflamed, may be a pain-producing structure. In appropriately indicated patients, a symptomatic long head of the biceps tendon can be surgically managed via tenotomy, tenodesis, and/or superior labrum anterior to posterior repair. In some patients, primary superior labrum anterior to posterior pathology can be managed via biceps tenodesis. Determining which procedure is most appropriate and which technique and implant are preferred for a given patient with biceps tendon pathology is controversial. Less debate exists with regard to the timing of distal biceps tendon repair; however, considerable controversy exists with regard to selection of an appropriate surgical technique and implant. In addition, the treatment of patients with a chronic and/or retracted distal biceps tendon tear and patients in whom distal biceps tendon repair fails is extremely challenging. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the anatomy of, nonsurgical and surgical treatment options for, and outcomes of patients with proximal or distal biceps tendon pathology.

Editorial Commentary: You May Not Have Seen It, but It Has Seen You: Diagnosis of Long Head Biceps Tendon and Subscapularis Pathology in Association With Shoulder Rotator Cuff Pathology Can Be Challenging

The shoulder can humble you. It is often challenging in determining the extent of pathology even when there is an adequate magnetic resonance imaging performed preoperatively and even during the so-called diagnostic portion of the arthroscopy. Abnormalities of the long head of the biceps tendon and the rotator cuff especially the subscapularis can be difficult to diagnose definitively. Experience can be very helpful in predicting pathology based on patterns seen before and knowing certain pearls that can make diagnosis and ultimately treatment more accurate.

Physical examination tests and imaging studies based on arthroscopic assessment of the long head of biceps tendon are invalid

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether glenohumeral arthroscopy is an appropriate gold standard for the diagnosis of long head of biceps (LHB) tendon pathology. The objectives were to evaluate whether the length of tendon that can be seen at arthroscopy allows visualisation of areas of predilection of pathology and also to determine the rates of missed diagnoses at arthroscopy when compared to an open approach.

METHODS

A systematic review of cadaveric and clinical studies was performed. The search strategy was applied to MEDLINE, PubMed and Google Scholar databases. All relevant articles were included. Critical appraisal of clinical studies was performed using a validated quality assessment scale.

RESULTS

Five articles were identified for inclusion in the review. This included both clinical and cadaveric studies. The overall population comprised 18 cadaveric specimens and 575 patients. Out of the five included studies, three reported the length of LHB tendon visualised during arthroscopy and four reported the rate of missed LHB diagnosis. Cadaveric studies showed that the use of a hook probe allowed arthroscopic visualisation of between 34 and 48 % of the overall length of the LHB. In the clinical series, the rate of missed diagnoses at arthroscopy when compared to open exploration ranged between 33 and 49 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopy allows visualisation of only a small part of the extra-articular LHB tendon. This leads to a high rate of missed pathology in the distal part of the tendon. Published figures for sensitivities and specificities of common physical examination and imaging tests for LHB pathology that are based on arthroscopy as the gold standard are therefore invalid. In clinical practice, it is important to note that a "negative" arthroscopic assessment does not exclude a lesion of the LHB tendon as this technique does not allow visualisation of common sites of distal pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Refuting the lipstick sign

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic examination of the tendon has been described as the "gold standard" for diagnosis of tendinitis of the long head of the biceps (LHB). An arthroscopic finding of an inflamed and hyperemic LHB within the bicipital groove has been described as the "lipstick sign." Studies evaluating direct visualization in diagnosis of LHB tendinitis are lacking.

METHODS

During a 1-year period, 363 arthroscopic shoulder procedures were performed, with 16 and 39 patients prospectively selected as positive cases and negative controls, respectively. All positive controls had groove tenderness, positive Speed maneuver, and diagnostic ultrasound-guided bicipital injection. Negative controls had none of these findings. Six surgeons reviewed randomized deidentified arthroscopic pictures of enrolled patients The surgeons were asked whether the images demonstrated LHB tendinitis and if the lipstick sign was present.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity and specificity were 49% and 66%, respectively, for detecting LHB tendinitis and 64% and 31%, respectively, for erythema. The nonweighted κ score for interobserver reliability ranged from 0.042 to 0.419 (mean, 0.215 ± 0.116) for tendinitis and from 0.486 to 0.835 (mean, 0.680 ± 0.102) for erythema. The nonweighted κ score for intraobserver reliability ranged from 0.264 to 0.854 (mean, 0.615) for tendinitis and from 0.641 to 0.951 (mean, 0.783) for erythema.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of the lipstick sign performed only moderately well in a rigorously designed level III study to evaluate its sensitivity and specificity. There is only fair agreement among participating surgeons in diagnosing LHB tendinitis arthroscopically. Consequently, LHB tendinitis requiring tenodesis remains a clinical diagnosis that should be made before arthroscopic examination.

Hypertrophy of the extra-articular tendon of the long head of biceps correlates with the location and size of a rotator cuff tear

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess hypertrophy of the extra-articular tendon of the long head of biceps (LHB) in patients with a rotator cuff tear.

Patients and Methods

The study involved 638 shoulders in 334 patients (175 men, 159 women, mean age 62.6 years; 25 to 81) with unilateral symptomatic rotator cuff tears. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the LHB tendon in the bicipital groove was measured pre-operatively in both shoulders using ultrasound. There were 154 asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the contralateral shoulder. Comparisons were made between those with a symptomatic tear, an asymptomatic tear and those with no rotator cuff tear. In the affected shoulders, the CSAs were compared in relation to the location and size of the rotator cuff tear.

Results

The mean CSA was 21.0 mm2 (4 to 71) in those with a symptomatic rotator cuff tear, 19.9 mm2 (4 to 75) in those with an asymptomatic rotator cuff tear and 14.1 mm2 (5 to 43) in those with no rotator cuff tear. The mean CSA in patients with both symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears was significantly larger than in those with no rotator cuff tear (p < 0.001). In the affected shoulders, there were significant differences between patients with more than a medium sized posterosuperior cuff tear and those with an antero-superior cuff tear.

Conclusion

Regardless of the symptoms, there was significant hypertrophy of the extra-articular LHB tendon in patients with a rotator cuff tear. The values were significantly related to the size of the tear. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:806–11.

Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Tenosynovitis of the Long Head of the Biceps in Active Patients Younger Than 45 Years Old

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess the outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis (BT) for long head of the biceps (LHB) tenosynovitis in active patients <45 years old.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective outcomes study with prospectively collected data. Patients treated with subpectoral BT were included if they met the following criteria: age <45 years, anterior shoulder pain with arthroscopically confirmed LHB tenosynovitis, no concomitant procedures other than debridement and decompression procedures, and minimum 2 years out from surgery. Patients were excluded from analysis if they refused participation. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Short Form-12, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and pain scores as well as sports participation preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively were obtained. Pre- and postoperative scores were compared using paired samples t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Thirty patients met the inclusion criteria. Two of these patients refused to participate in follow-up and were excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 28 patients (17 male, 11 female; 37.0 ± 8.0 years), minimum 2-year outcomes were available for 24 (13 males, 11 females: 37.7 ± 8.2 years; 85.7%). Mean follow-up was 3.1 years (range, 2.0 to 7.3 years). There were significant improvements in all outcome measures including ASES score (P < .001), with a postoperative mean of 95.8 ± 7.8, visual analog scale "pain today" (P < .001), and pain affecting activities of daily living (P < .001). Seventeen of 20 (85%) patients who answered the question about postoperative sport participation were able to return to sport. Mean patient satisfaction was 9.2/10 (standard deviation, +1.7). There were no postoperative complications such as Popeye deformity or cramping. There were no clinical failures.

CONCLUSIONS

Subpectoral BT is an excellent treatment option for active patients <45 years old with LHB tenosynovitis and chronic anterior shoulder pain, resulting in decreased pain, improved function, high satisfaction, and improved quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

The "3-Pack" Examination Is Critical for Comprehensive Evaluation of the Biceps-Labrum Complex and the Bicipital Tunnel: A Prospective Study

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic value of the 3-Pack examination for biceps-labrum complex (BLC) disease, assess interobserver reliability, and generate an evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm.

METHODS

A total of 145 consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective comparative study. The study included 116 chronically symptomatic patients indicated for arthroscopic subdeltoid transfer of the long head of the biceps tendon to the conjoint tendon and 29 asymptomatic comparison subjects. Each patient underwent examination that included the 3-Pack (active compression test [O'Brien sign], throwing test, and bicipital tunnel palpation) and traditional examination (Speed test; Yergason test; full can test; empty can test) in a blinded, randomized fashion by 3 investigators. Intraoperative BLC disease was prospectively categorized by location (inside, junctional, or bicipital tunnel).

RESULTS

3-Pack tests were highly sensitive (73% to 98%), but less specific (46% to 79%) for BLC in all 3 locations than some of the traditional tests, which were less sensitive (20% to 67%), but more specific (83% to 100%) for BLC disease in all 3 locations. With regard to hidden bicipital tunnel lesions, palpation and O'Brien sign were highly sensitive (97.8% and 95.7% respectively) and revealed high negative predictive value (NPV, 96.4% and 92.6% respectively). Speed and Yergason tests, conversely, were poorly sensitive but had high specificities (86.7% and 97.9%, respectively) and positive predictive value (76% and 92.3%, respectively). Inter-rater reliabilities were substantial to almost perfect for the 3-Pack examination (kappa 70% to 85%) and fair to moderate for the 4 traditional examinations (kappa 25% to 56%).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3-Pack has excellent inter-rater reliability, sensitivity, and NPV and is a critical screening tool for BLC disease in all zones. Hidden extra-articular bicipital tunnel disease can reliably be excluded based on negative tenderness to palpation or a negative O'Brien sign (NPV 93% to 96%).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case control study.

Editorial Commentary: Using a 70° Arthroscope to Evaluate the Biceps Tendon and Rule Out Bicipital Tunnel Disease Is Better Than Using a 30° Arthroscope… but Still Inadequate

In a well-constructed study using both cadaveric and in vivo models, Sheean et al. found that use of a 70° arthroscope significantly improves visualization of the long head of the biceps tendon and zone 1 of the bicipital tunnel compared with a standard 30° arthroscope during shoulder arthroscopy. Enthusiasm for the added visualization afforded by the 70° arthroscope, however, should be tempered by the fact that zone 2 of the bicipital tunnel and the biceps tendon within remain hidden from view along with any pathology it harbors. Clinicians should not over-rely on diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy when assessing for bicipital tunnel disease.

A 70° Arthroscope Significantly Improves Visualization of the Bicipital Groove in the Lateral Decubitus Position

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to quantify the length of the bicipital groove viewable with a 70° arthroscope and to compare this distance visualized with use of a 30° arthroscope in both cadavers and living subjects.

METHODS

Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy in the lateral decubitus position was performed on 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders from a posterior portal. Using 70° and 30° arthroscopes, the distalmost viewable portion of the bicipital groove was percutaneously marked. Dissection of each specimen was then performed, and the distances between the articular margins of the humeral head to each marked portion of bicipital groove were recorded. Subsequently, a similar technique was used to measure the visible length of the bicipital groove in a series of 11 patients at the time of diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy performed in the lateral decubitus position using 70° and 30° arthroscopes. Descriptive statistics were used for continuous data. Means were compared with a Mann-Whitney test. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ .05.

RESULTS

The cadaveric analysis revealed a significant increase in the amount of bicipital groove visualized with the 70° arthroscope versus that visualized with the 30° arthroscope (18.0 ± 6.9 mm v 11 ± 4.7 mm, P = .01). In similar fashion, the results of the in vivo analysis showed that the 70° arthroscope allowed for significantly more visualization of the bicipital groove than the 30° arthroscope (26.3 ± 6.2 mm v 14 ± 4.7 mm, P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a 70° arthroscope significantly increases the length of bicipital groove visualized during glenohumeral arthroscopy in the lateral decubitus position compared with that of the 30° arthroscope in both cadavers and living subjects.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Routine use of a 70° arthroscope significantly improves visualization of the bicipital groove and all relevant intra-articular structures compared with that of a 30° arthroscope during diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy performed in the lateral decubitus position.

Shoulder Problems Motivate Innovative Solutions

Shoulder arthroscopic and related surgeons may require expertise in use of the 70° arthroscope, biologic patch augmentation, repair of massive rotator cuff tears, the Latarjet procedure and related glenoid bone augmentation, and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

The Clinical Impact of Bicipital Tunnel Decompression During Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

(1) To identify existing outcomes studies and (2) to use meta-analysis techniques to summarize pooled clinical outcomes for surgical techniques that decompress the bicipital tunnel and those that do not, to identify important areas for future clinical investigation.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed database was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Patients were categorized into 2 groups for analysis. Group 1, the "tunnel decompressed" group, included open subpectoral tenodesis, long head of the biceps tendon transfer procedures, and proximal tenodesis techniques that explicitly released the bicipital sheath. Group 2, the "tunnel not decompressed" group, included proximal tenodesis techniques and tenotomy. Validated clinical outcome measures (Constant; University of California, Los Angeles; Simple Shoulder Test; visual analog scale for pain; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) and revision rates were summarized using inverse-variance weighting in a random-effects model. Because the constituent studies were largely single-cohort observational studies, direct between-group statistical comparisons could not be made.

RESULTS

Thirty studies (comprising 1,881 patients) met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Constant score was the most commonly reported outcome measure (16 cohorts, 961 patients) and was seemingly higher in group 1 (88.3 v 81.7). Revision rates; University of California, Los Angeles scores; Simple Shoulder Test scores; visual analog scale scores for pain; and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores appeared to be similar between groups. The mean patient age was 50.7 ± 5.7 years for group 1 and 58.9 ± 6.3 years for group 2. The Egger intercept method showed an intercept of -13.29 (P < .001) for the Constant score, indicating a high likelihood of publication bias in the included studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Bicipital tunnel-decompressing techniques showed apparently higher Constant scores compared with non-decompressing techniques but may have been affected by differences in mean patient age between groups. Existing literature consists of largely single-cohort retrospective observational Level IV studies, which are likely influenced by significant publication bias.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level II through IV studies.

Predictive factors of long head of the biceps tendon disorders-the bicipital groove morphology and subscapularis tendon tear

BACKGROUND

Disorders of the long head of the biceps (LHB) tendon contribute to anterior shoulder pain. Although LHB tendon disorders are associated with rotator cuff disease, distinguishing between biceps and rotator cuff pathology is difficult. The objective was to identify the predictors of LHB tendon disorders associated with a supraspinatus tear.

METHODS

In 55 patients (average age, 65 years) undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, bicipital groove morphology were assessed using computed tomography, and subscapularis tear and bicipital groove effusion were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging, retrospectively. The LHB tendon was evaluated arthroscopically according to the Lafosse classification. Univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses were conducted for injury grade with all covariates.

RESULTS

The arthroscopic evaluation of the LHB tendon showed that there were 23 shoulders classified as grade 0, 15 as grade 1, and 17 as grade 2. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that the width and depth, a medial spur of the bicipital groove, and a subscapularis tear were significantly associated with LHB tendon disorders. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis identified a medial spur and subscapularis tear as significant predictors of LHB tendon disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance images, notably the presence of a spur on the bicipital groove or a subscapularis tear, were useful for identifying LHB tendon disorders. When these are found in preoperative images, the clinician should evaluate the patient for the presence of an LHB tendon disorder as a pain generator.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Currently Fails to Fully Evaluate the Biceps-Labrum Complex and Bicipital Tunnel

PURPOSE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for biceps-labrum complex (BLC) lesions, including the extra-articular bicipital tunnel.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 277 shoulders with chronic refractory BLC symptoms that underwent arthroscopic subdeltoid transfer of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) to the conjoint tendon was conducted. Intraoperative lesions were categorized as "inside" (labral tears and dynamic LHBT incarceration), "junctional" (LHBT partial tears, LHBT subluxation, and biceps chondromalacia), or "bicipital tunnel" (extra-articular bicipital tunnel scar/stenosis, loose bodies, LHBT instability, and LHBT partial tears) based on anatomic location. Attending radiologist-generated MRI reports were graded dichotomously as positive or negative for biceps and labral damage and then compared with intraoperative findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for MRI with respect to intraoperative findings.

RESULTS

With regard to inside lesions, MRI had an overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for labrum lesions of 77.3%, 68.2%, 57.3%, and 84.5% respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MRI for junctional lesions were 43.3%, 55.6%, 73.1%, and 26.0%, respectively. For the bicipital tunnel, MRI had a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 50.4%, 61.4%, 48.7%, and 63.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI was unreliable for ruling out BLC lesions among chronically symptomatic patients, including when the bicipital tunnel was affected.

Shoulder Arthroscopy Does Not Adequately Visualize Pathology of the Long Head of Biceps Tendon

Background:

Pulling the long head of the biceps tendon into the joint at arthroscopy is a common method for evaluation of tendinopathic lesions. However, the rate of missed diagnoses when using this technique is reported to be as high as 30% to 50%.

Hypothesis:

Tendon excursion achieved using a standard arthroscopic probe does not allow adequate visualization of extra-articular sites of predilection of tendinopathy.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

Seven forequarter amputation cadaveric specimens were evaluated. The biceps tendon was tagged to mark the intra-articular length and the maximum excursions achieved using a probe and a grasper in both beach-chair and lateral positions. Statistical analyses were performed using analysis of variance to compare means.

Results:

The mean intra-articular and extra-articular lengths of the tendons were 23.9 and 82.3 mm, respectively. The length of tendon that could be visualized by pulling it into the joint with a probe through the anterior midglenoid portal was not significantly different when using either lateral decubitus (mean ± SD, 29.9 ± 3.89 mm; 95% CI, 25.7-34 mm) or beach-chair positions (32.7 ± 4.23 mm; 95% CI, 28.6-36.8 mm). The maximum length of the overall tendon visualized in any specimen using a standard technique was 37 mm. Although there was a trend to greater excursion using a grasper through the same portal, this was not statistically significant. However, using a grasper through the anterosuperior portal gave a significantly greater mean excursion than any other technique (46.7 ± 4.31 mm; 95% CI, 42.6-50.8 mm), but this still failed to allow evaluation of Denard zone C.

Conclusion:

Pulling the tendon into the joint with a probe via an anterior portal does not allow visualization of distal sites of predilection of pathology. Surgeons should be aware that this technique is inadequate and can result in missed diagnoses.

Clinical Relevance:

This study demonstrates that glenohumeral arthroscopy does not allow visualization of common areas of pathology of the long head of the biceps tendon.

Long head of the biceps brachii tendon: unenhanced MRI versus direct MR arthrography

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced MRI and direct MR arthrography (MRA) for evaluation of the intra-articular long head of the biceps brachii tendon (LHBT) using arthroscopy as the gold standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent shoulder MRI (n = 132) and MRA (n = 67) within 12 months prior to arthroscopy was performed. MR images were independently reviewed by two blinded musculoskeletal radiologists. Routinely recorded arthroscopic photos/videos were reviewed by an orthopedic surgeon. The LHBT was graded as normal, tendinosis, partial thickness tear less or greater than 50%, and complete tear. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for tendinosis and tear detection were calculated.

RESULTS

MRI correctly diagnosed fewer normal LHBTs compared to MRA (39-54% versus 74-84%, respectively; p < 0.005). MRI and MRA did not differ significantly in the diagnosis of tendinosis (18-36% and 15-38%, respectively; p > 0.05) and tears (75-83% and 64-73%, respectively; p > 0.05). For tendinosis, MRI versus MRA showed 18-36% and 15-38% sensitivity, 69-79% and 83-91% specificity, 22-28% and 18-50% PPV, 74-76% and 80-86% NPV, and 61-64% and 70-81% accuracy; respectively. For tears, MRI versus MRA showed 75-83% and 64-73% sensitivity, 73-75% and 82-91% specificity, 66-69% and 41-62% PPV, 82-87% and 92-94% NPV, and 74-78% and 79-88% accuracy; respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found between unenhanced MRI and direct MRA for the detection of tendinosis and tears of LHBTs.