Long-term Results of Arthroscopic Arthrolysis for Arthrofibrosis After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Manipulation Under Anesthesia and Lysis of Adhesions Are the Most Commonly Reported Treatments for Arthrofibrosis of the Knee After Arthroscopy or Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Both Pediatric and Adult Patients

Purpose

To systematically review the literature and provide a detailed summary of the current treatments and outcomes for arthrofibrosis following knee arthroscopy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to compare the treatment strategies in pediatric and adult populations.

Methods

A systematic review was performed in March 2022 using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Search terms consisted of variations of the following: ("arthrofibrosis" OR "stiffness" OR "stiff" OR "complications") AND ("arthroscopy" OR "arthroscop" OR "ACL" OR "anterior cruciate") AND ("treat" OR "care" OR "management" AND "knee"). The inclusion criteria were studies that were written in English, were published since 2000, and that reported outcomes of knee arthroscopy or ACLR for treatment of arthrofibrosis of the knee. The study quality was assessed, and data about the patients and treatments were recorded. Treatments were compared between pediatric and adult patients.

Results

A total of 1,208 articles were identified in the initial search, 42 (3.48%) of which met eligibility criteria, involving treatment regimens for arthrofibrosis following knee arthroscopy or ACLR. Of the 42 studies included, 29 (69.0%) were reported data for adults and 13 (31.0%) reported data for pediatric patients. Thirty-nine studies (92.8%) discussed manipulation under anesthesia and/or lysis of adhesions (LOA) as treatment for arthrofibrosis of the knee, whereas 2 (4.8%) described the use of medications.

Conclusions

Within orthopaedic sports medicine literature, there is variability in the reported treatment options for arthrofibrosis of the knee. Most studies identified manipulation under anesthesia and/or LOA as the treatment among both adult and pediatric patients. Other variants include notchplasty, open posterior arthrolysis, total graft resection, removal of hardware with LOA, dynamic splinting, casting in extension, bracing, and medications.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Recurrent cyclops lesion after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone tendon bone allograft: A case report

BACKGROUND

Cyclops lesions are a known complication of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, with symptomatic cyclops syndrome occurring in up to 11% of surgeries. Recurrent cyclops lesions have been rarely documented; this case study documents the successful treatment of a recurrent cyclops lesion.

CASE SUMMARY

A 28-year-old female presented following a non-contact injury to the right knee. Workup and clinical exam revealed an ACL tear, and arthroscopic reconstruction was performed. Two years later a cyclops lesion was discovered and removed via arthroscopic synovectomy. Seven months postoperatively, the patient presented with pain, stiffness, and difficulty achieving terminal extension. A smaller recurrent cyclops lesion was diagnosed, and a repeat synovectomy was performed. The patient recovered fully.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented case of recurrent cyclops lesion after bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft ACL reconstruction presenting as cyclops syndrome.

Risk Factors of Loss of Knee Range of Motion after Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction following Preoperative Recovery of Knee Range of Motion

The loss of knee range of motion (ROM) is not an uncommon complication after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the risk factors of loss of knee ROM remain debatable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of loss of knee ROM at 12 months after primary ACLR performed after regaining full knee ROM preoperatively. Consecutive patients who underwent primary ACLR after regaining full ROM between January 2014 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received a surgical arthrolysis within 12 months after ACLR or those who had a loss of knee ROM at 12 months postoperatively were defined as the loss of ROM group. Possible risk factors of loss of knee ROM, including patient demographic, preoperative, surgical, and postoperative factors, were assessed. The notch wide index and radiographic parameters of the tibial spines; medial tibial spine height/tibial length (TL), lateral tibial spine height (LTSH)/TL, and tibial spine width (TSW)/TL, were also assessed. A total of 141 patients (141 knees) were included (mean age, 25.8 ± 11.4 years; male/female, 56/85). Of the 141 patients, three received surgical arthrolysis within 12 months, and 23 had a loss of knee ROM at 12 months after ACLR. On comparing patients with and without loss of knee ROM, significant differences were found in the age (p = 0.04), LTSH/TL (p = 0.02), and TSW/TL (p = 0.02). A multivariate regression analysis showed that the age (odds ratio [OR]; 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.09, p = 0.02), LTSH/TL (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01-2.1, p = 0.04), and TSW/TL (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.97, p = 0.02) were identified as significant independent risk predictors of loss of knee ROM. This study showed that the incidence of loss of knee ROM at 12 months after primary ACLR was 18.4% (26/141). An older age, a higher LTSH/TL, and a smaller TSW/TL may be associated with loss of knee ROM at 12 months after ACLR.

Evaluation of a smartphone application for self-rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during a COVID-19 lockdown

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation after surgery is a crucial process that governs the final functional outcome. The self-rehabilitation smartphone application Doct'up (Healing SAS, Lyon, France) is designed for patients who have had anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. In France in the spring of 2020, the lockdown mandated due to the COVID-19 pandemic prevented patients from seeing their physiotherapists for 2 months. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes in two groups of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery: in one group, surgery performed before the lockdown was followed by standard in-person physiotherapy while, in the other, surgery was done just before the lockdown and rehabilitation was performed by the patients themselves using the phone application.

HYPOTHESIS

Using a self-rehabilitation smartphone app limits the negative effects of not receiving physiotherapist rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a case-control study involving the retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from two groups of patients who had undergone ACL reconstruction surgery. Patients in the App group had surgery just before the 2-month COVID-19-related lockdown that started in France on March 17, 2020,and used only the smartphone app for rehabilitation. The standard-care group was composed of matched controls who had surgery 1 year before the cases and received rehabilitation therapy during in-person physiotherapist visits. The ACL reconstruction technique was the same in the two groups. The primary outcome measure was extension lag 6 weeks after surgery. The secondary outcome measures were extension lag 3 weeks and 6 months after surgery, quadriceps muscle activation, knee extension locking 3 and 6 weeks after surgery, and the 6-month rate of surgical revision for cyclops syndrome.

RESULTS

We included 32 cases managed using only self-rehabilitation guided by the phone app, and we identified 101 matched controls managed using standard care. We found no significant between-group difference in extension lag after 6 weeks: 9.4% (28/32) vs. 4.6% (87/101), p=0.39. After 3 weeks, the App group had a higher proportions of patients with quadriceps activation (94% [30/32] vs. 73% [74/101], p=0.015) and extension control using canes (78.1% [25/32] vs. 40.6% [41/101], p=0.0002). None of the other measured outcomes differed significantly between the two groups (extension lag after 3 weeks: 12.5% [4/32] vs. 13.8% 14/101]; extension lag after 6 months: 3.2% [1/32] vs. 1% [1/101]; quadriceps activation after 6 weeks: 97% [31/32] vs. 99% [100/101]; extension locking with canes after 6 weeks: 96.9% [31/32] vs. 93.1% [94/101]; extension locking without canes after 3 weeks: 53.2% [17/32] vs. 47.5% [48/101]; extension locking without canes after 6 weeks: 93.7% [30/32] vs. 82.2% [83/101]; and surgery for cyclops syndrome (3.1% [1/32] vs. 1% [1/101]).

DISCUSSION

The use of a self-rehabilitation phone app after ACL reconstruction during a COVID-19 lockdown limited the adverse effects of not receiving in-person physiotherapy. The 6-month outcomes were similar to those seen with standard rehabilitation. The study results demonstrate the usefulness of self-rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction surgery. Self-rehabilitation guided by a phone app could be used as a complement to the protocols generally applied by physiotherapists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, single-centre retrospective case-control study.

A Comparison of Two-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Clinical Outcomes Using All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Femoral/Tibial Cortical Suspensory Fixation Versus Tibial Interference Screw Fixation

PURPOSE

To contribute to future quadriceps tendon harvest and fixation guidelines in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by comparing 2-year patient-reported subjective knee outcome scores and incidence of graft-related complications between the shorter harvest all-inside tibial-femoral suspensory fixation (TFSF) approach versus the longer harvest standard tibial interference screw fixation technique.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft from January 2017 to May 2019 were identified for inclusion. Patients were matched into 2 cohorts of 62 based on reconstruction technique. All patients completed baseline and minimum 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner Activity Level, and Lysholm questionnaires and were queried regarding subsequent procedures and complications to the operative knee.

RESULTS

Average graft length for the all-inside TFSF was 69.55 (95% confidence interval 68.99-70.19) mm versus 79.27 (95% confidence interval 77.21-81.34) mm in the tibial screw fixation cohort (P = .00001). Two-year Lysholm scores were greater in the TFSF cohort (P = .04) but were not clinically significant. There was no difference in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .09) or Tegner (P = .69) scores between cohorts, but more patients in the TFSF cohort returned to or exceeded their baseline activity level compared with the tibial screw fixation cohort (73% vs 61%, P = .25). Seven patients in the TFSF cohort versus 13 in the tibial screw fixation cohort reported anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty (P = .22). There were no differences in reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft with TFSF resulted in clinically comparable subjective outcome scores at 2 years to tibial screw fixation. There were also no differences in complications or reports of anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty. All-inside TFSF can be a viable alternative to tibial screw fixation for all-soft tissue quadriceps autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, comparative therapeutic trial.

Differences in patellofemoral kinematics between weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions in patients with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference of patellofemoral kinematics between weightbearing and non-weightbearing conditions in the arthrofibrotic knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Twenty patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction were included in the study. Computed tomography scanner and dual fluoroscopic imaging techniques were used to compare patellofemoral kinematics of the affected knee between weightbearing knee flexion and non-weightbearing knee flexion. In both positions, patellofemoral kinematics in six degrees-of-freedom (6 DOF) were measured respectively.

RESULTS

The patellar lateral tilt angle (p = 0.007) and medial patellar translation (p = 0.043) under the weightbearing condition were significantly decreased compared to the non-weightbearing task between 5° and 15° of knee flexion. The lateral patellar translation during a non-weightbearing task was significantly decreased between 60° and 75° of knee flexion (p = 0.005), and the inferior patellar translation under the weightbearing condition was significantly increased between 45° and 75° of knee flexion (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that patellofemoral kinematics during non-weightbearing positions do not sufficiently represent the patellar tracking during functional weightbearing activities. Our findings of this study establish the clinical relevance and significance of assessing the patellofemoral kinematics under the weightbearing condition when evaluating patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registration number: ChiCTR1900025977.

[Surgical treatment of arthrofibrosis of the knee joint]

Die Arthrofibrose des Kniegelenks ist eine schwerwiegende Komplikation nach Trauma und Operation, da die Funktion des Gelenks häufig dauerhaft beeinträchtigt wird. Es werden nach wie vor frühzeitige Mobilisierungstechniken und die Anästhesie eingesetzt, ohne dass die zugrunde liegenden Prozesse ausreichend aufgeklärt wurden. Während die Frühphase der Arthrofibrose gut auf konservative Maßnahmen zur Schmerzreduktion und zur Wundheilungsregulation anspricht, ist in der Spätphase häufig straffes kollagenes Narbengewebe vorhanden, das die Beweglichkeit dauerhaft einschränkt. In dieser Phase ist eine Verbesserung der Beweglichkeit ohne chirurgische Maßnahmen in der Mehrzahl der Fälle aussichtslos. Bei einer chirurgischen Therapie sollte zwischen der lokalisierten (zumeist sekundären) Arthrofibrose (z. B. Kreuzbandoperation) und einer generalisierten Arthrofibrose (primär, in der Mehrzahl der Fälle nach einer Knietotalendoprothese [Knie-TEP]) unterschieden und die Behandlung entsprechend geplant werden. Begleitende pathologische Veränderungen (Transplantatposition, Instabilität der TEP, Implantatverschleiß, „Low-grade“-Infektion, patellofemorale Instabilität oder „maltracking“, Patella baja) müssen bei der Behandlung berücksichtigt werden. Eine multimodale Begleitbehandlung (Physiotherapie, Schmerztherapie, Psychosomatik) ist zur Sicherung des Behandlungserfolgs notwendig.

Arthroscopic Release of Severe Flexion- and Extension-Impeding Knee Stiffness With Inaccessible Joint

Knee stiffness with severe flexion and extension impediment is a common clinical condition that challenges orthopaedic surgeons. Arthroscopic release techniques have been reported, mostly for slight extension or flexion deficits. However, for severe flexion- and extension-impeding knee stiffness, especially when there is no intra-articular space in which to place the arthroscope, effective arthroscopic release techniques are still being pursued. We introduce a systemic arthroscopic release technique to address this special condition, in which a trans-infrapatellar fat pad release technique is developed to obtain access to the joint and to perform intra-articular and periarticular release, as well as scar tissue removal. One critical point of this technique is to create the posteromedial and posterolateral portals to re-establish the posterior compartments, remove the fibrotic posterior septum, and release the posterior capsule. This technique combines almost all related arthroscopic techniques in the treatment of knee stiffness. We consider that the introduction of this technique will provide a useful guide when surgical release is selected for this special condition.

Gender differences in knee kinematics during weight-bearing knee flexion for patients with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

Knowledge of tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint kinematics is important for understanding gender-related dimorphism in developing knee arthrofibrosis and advancement of related treatments. The objective of our study was to investigate gender differences existing in tibiofemoral kinematics and patellar tracking in patients with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction during weight-bearing knee flexion.

Methods

The tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint kinematics were measured in 30 patients (15 male and 15 female) with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction during a lunge task, using computed tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system. These data were analyzed for gender differences.

Results

The range of tibial rotation, patellar inferior shift, tilt, and flexion were significantly decreased in the affected knee compared to the contralateral knee from 15° to 75° of knee flexion (P ≤ 0.04). Statistically significant difference was detected for medial tibial translation between male and female patients at 60° (P = 0.04) and 75° of knee flexion (P = 0.02). The tibial rotation was significantly decreased at 60° (P = 0.03) and 75° of knee flexion (P < 0.01) in females. The inferior patellar shift in females was significantly lower than that in males at 15° (P = 0.04) and 30° of knee flexion (P = 0.01). The patellar tilt was significantly lower at 60° (P = 0.02) and 75° of knee flexion (P < 0.01) in females compared to males.

Conclusions

The results indicated a significant effect of gender on knee kinematics in patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction during weight-bearing knee flexion. These gender differences in tibiofemoral kinematics and patellar tracking may warrant further investigations to determine implications for making gender-specific surgical treatments and rehabilitation programs.

The intercondylar fossa-A narrative review

The intercondylar fossa (“intercondylar notch,” IN) is a groove at the distal end of the femur, housing important stabilizing structures: cruciate ligaments and meniscofemoral ligaments. As the risk for injury to these structures correlates with changes to the IN, exact knowledge of its morphology, possible physiological and pathological changes and different approaches for evaluating it are important. The divergent ways of assessing the IN and the corresponding measurement methods have led to various descriptions of its possible shapes. Ridges at the medial and lateral wall are considered clinically important because they can help with orientation during arthroscopy, whereas ridges at the osteochondral border could affect the risk of ligament injury. Changes related to aging and sex differences have been documented, further emphasizing the importance of individual assessment of the knee joint. Overall, it is of the utmost importance to remember the interactions between the osseous housing and the structures within.

Knee Extensor Mechanism Strength and Its Relationship to Patellofemoral Kinematics in Individuals With Arthrofibrosis Within 6 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT

Performance in strength and assessment of patellar tracking is important for patients with arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE

The study was to examine the difference of patellofemoral kinematics between the affected and the contralateral limb and to evaluate the relationship between knee extensor strength and patellofemoral kinematics in patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction.

DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis); level of evidence, 3.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS

A prospective cohort of 20 patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction was recruited.

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 20 patients who underwent arthroscopic reconstruction of the double-bundle ACL with a hamstring tendon autograft received standardized patellofemoral kinematics testing and knee extensor strength testing within 6 months after primary ACL reconstruction. Computed tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging were used to evaluate in vivo patellofemoral kinematics of affected and contralateral knees during a lunge task. Knee extensor mechanism strength was measured using a handheld dynamometer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A limb symmetry index of knee strength and patellar mobility was calculated and satisfactory performance defined as ≥90%.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant decrease in the range of patellar inferior shift (P = .020; d = 0.81), flexion (P = .026; d = 0.95), lateral tilt (P = .001; d = 1.04), and lateral rotation (P < .001; d = 0.89) in the affected knee compared with the contralateral knee from 15° to 75° of knee flexion. There was a strong positive linear correlation between knee extensor strength and patellar inferior shift (r = .747; P = .008). A knee extensor strength limb symmetry index <90% was 89% sensitive and 9% specific for limited patellar inferior shift.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction presented decreased patellar mobility in the arthrofibrotic knee compared with the contralateral knee. The strong correlation between knee extensor strength and patellar inferior shift of the arthrofibrotic knee demonstrates the importance of knee extensor strength in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with knee arthrofibrosis. The knee extensor mechanism strength has high sensitivity but low specificity in identifying a decrease in patellar inferior shift in patients with arthrofibrosis after ACL reconstruction.

Evidence-based Risk Stratification for Sport Medicine Procedures During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Orthopaedic practices have been markedly affected by the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the ban on elective procedures, it is impossible to define the medical urgency of a case solely on whether a case is on an elective surgery schedule. Orthopaedic surgical procedures should consider COVID-19-associated risks and an assimilation of all available disease dependent, disease independent, and logistical information that is tailored to each patient, institution, and region. Using an evidence-based risk stratification of clinical urgency, we provide a framework for prioritization of orthopaedic sport medicine procedures that encompasses such factors. This can be used to facilitate the risk-benefit assessment of the timing and setting of a procedure during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Expression of xylosyltransferases I and II and their role in the pathogenesis of arthrofibrosis

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis is a painful and restraining complication that occurs after about 10% of total knee arthroplasty and cruciate ligament surgery. The pathogenesis of arthrofibrosis has not yet been fully understood. Stress signals stimulate immune cells, and fibroblast differentiates into myofibroblast, which produce a large amount of collagen. Xylosyltransferases also appear to be involved in these pathways. They catalyze proteoglycan biosynthesis, which is involved in tissue remodeling and myofibroblast differentiation. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the disease arthrofibrosis and the expression of the two isoforms of xylosyltransferases I and II.

METHODS

Tissue samples from 14 patients with arthrofibrosis were compared with tissue samples from seven healthy controls. The xylosyltransferases were detected by immunohistochemistry. The tissues were divided into four different areas of interest: vessels, synovialis, cell-poor and cell-rich fibrosis, or cell-poor and cell-rich areas in the control group. A quantification of the results was performed by modification of the immunoreactive score according to Remmele and Stegner.

RESULTS

Xylosyltransferase I was expressed in the various tissue types at varying rates. Xylosyltransferase I expression was considerably and significantly stronger than that of xylosyltransferase II. The following sequences of xylosyltransferase I and xylosyltransferase II expression were determined as follows: vessels >> cell-rich fibrosis > cell-poor fibrosis > synovialis. A positive correlation between the number of positive fibroblasts and the immunoreactive scoring system (IRS) was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant positive correlation of xylosyltransferase -I expression with increasing number of fibroblasts demonstrates a high myofibroblast differentiation rate, which implies a gradual event as the pathogenesis of arthrofibrosis.

Incidence and risk factors for cyclops syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Cyclops syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is due to a fibrous nodule that develops in the anterior part of the intercondylar notch and prevents full knee extension. The primary objective of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the incidence of symptomatic cyclops lesion after ACL reconstruction. The secondary objective was to identify risk factors for cyclops syndrome.

HYPOTHESIS

Cyclops syndrome is common after ACL reconstruction and has several risk factors reported in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed by searching the PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Embase databases with the key terms 'cyclops' and 'ACL reconstruction'. The data thus retrieved were evaluated independently by two investigators. All articles in English or French that reported the incidence and risk factors of cyclops syndrome after ACL reconstruction were included.

RESULTS

The search retrieved the titles and abstracts of 79 articles, of which 20 were selected to be read in full; among these, 10 were included in the study. The incidence of symptomatic cyclops lesion ranged from 1.9% to 10.9%. Identified risk factors were as follows: pre-operatively, knee inflammation and/or motion restriction at the time of ACL reconstruction; intra-operatively, narrow intercondylar notch and excessively anterior position of the tibial tunnel; and post-operatively, persistent hamstring muscle spasm.

DISCUSSION

Development of a cyclops lesion is common after ACL reconstruction, occurs early, and may require further surgery. The knowledge of the risk factors provided by this study may improve the ability to devise effective preventive measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, systematic literature review.

Subsequent Surgery for Loss of Motion After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Influence Function at 2 Years: A Matched Case-Control Analysis

BACKGROUND

Loss of motion (LOM) remains a common complication after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and can be detrimental to patient outcomes after surgery. LOM is multifactorial, but nonsurgical and surgical solutions to this complex problem are available. A paucity of quality data exists evaluating clinical outcomes after the surgical treatment of patients with LOM after ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients undergoing surgical lysis of adhesions and manipulation under anesthesia for LOM after ACL reconstruction will exhibit decreased function, lower outcome scores, and delayed time of release to play when compared with matched controls without LOM.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A database of 1572 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction was sampled from 2013 to 2017 to identify a total of 58 patients (LOM group [n = 29] vs matched control group [n = 29]). Group comparisons were examined for patients requiring a second surgical procedure for LOM versus matched controls after ACL reconstruction for differences in surgical timing, self-reported International Knee Disability Committee scores, objective function at release to play, and subjective knee function at 2 years with the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. The risk of a type I error was set at α = .05 for all statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent lysis of adhesions and manipulation under anesthesia for LOM after ACL reconstruction exhibited no differences in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation knee function at 2 years when compared with matched controls (85.8 ± 14.9 vs 88.0 ± 10.8, P = .606). All patients met release-to-play criteria. Only International Knee Disability Committee scores (P = .046) and single-legged hop testing (P = .050) reached statistically significant differences, with higher scores in the control group. There was no difference in the time to release to play (P = .034) or level of participation (P = .180) between the control and surgical groups. Subjective function scores at 2 years were not significantly different between groups. Tourniquet time during the index ACL reconstruction was shorter in the control group (P = .034).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that patients who undergo surgical treatment for LOM after ACL reconstruction can release to play at similar times but display relative deficits in single-legged-hop symmetry and lower self-reported function when compared with matched controls. Longer surgical times may increase the risk for LOM after ACL reconstruction.

REGISTRATION

NCT03704376 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Adductor Canal Nerve Versus Femoral Nerve Blockade for Pain Control and Quadriceps Function Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Patellar Tendon Autograft: A Prospective Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To compare femoral nerve blockade (FNB) versus adductor canal nerve blockade (ACB) for postoperative pain control and quadriceps muscle function in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft.

METHODS

A randomized therapeutic trial of 90 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft was conducted comparing ACB versus FNB at 24 hours, 2 and 4 weeks, and 6 months postsurgery. Early outcome measures included average pain score and morphine equivalent units (milligrams) consumed, quadriceps surface electromyography, straight leg raise, and ability to ambulate without assistive devices. The 6-month outcome measures included knee range of motion (ROM), isokinetic knee extension peak torque, single-leg squat, and single-leg hop performance. Complications were recorded throughout the study for the development of anterior knee pain, knee extension ROM loss, deep vein thrombosis, and graft failure. Mixed-model analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed using an alpha of .05.

RESULTS

Quadriceps surface electromyography deficits were higher for FNB at 24 hours (P < .001) and 2 weeks (P < .001) when compared with the ACB group. There were no between-groups difference for subjective pain (P = .793) or morphine consumption (P = .358) within the first 24 hours of surgery. A higher percentage of patients in the ACB group met the full ambulation criteria at 4 weeks compared with the FNB group (100% vs 84.2%, P < .001). No between-group differences were observed at 6 months; however, the rate of knee extension ROM loss was higher for the FNB group versus the ACB group (21.1% vs 5.0%, P = .026), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

ACB was as effective as FNB at providing pain control while eliciting fewer quadriceps muscle activation deficits and fewer postoperative complications. Based on previous evidence and the results of this study, we recommend the use of ACB over FNB for the analgesic management of patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective randomized controlled trial.

Contamination occurs during ACL graft harvesting and manipulation, but it can be easily eradicated

PURPOSE

Why anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autograft soaking in a 5 mg/ml vancomycin solution decreases the rate of infection has not been well-explained. One hypothesis is that grafts can be contaminated during harvesting and vancomycin eradicates the bacteria. The purpose of the present study is to assess how the vancomycin solution acts against ACL graft contamination during graft harvesting and preparation.

METHODS

The study was carried out in three university hospitals over a period of 6 months. After sample size calculation, 50 patients were included in the study. Three samples were taken from each ACL graft. Sample 1 was obtained immediately after graft harvesting. After graft manipulation and preparation, the remaining tissue was divided into two parts. The raw sample was denominated sample 2 and sample 3 consisted of the rest of the remaining tissue that had been soaked in the vancomycin solution. All the cultures were incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO₂ in agar plates for 7 days (aerobically) or 14 days (anaerobically) and inspected daily for microbial growth. Any bacterial growth and the number of colony forming units were reported.

RESULTS

In seven cases (14%), either sample 1 or sample 2 was positive. In five of the cases (10%), only the sample after graft preparation was positive (sample 2). In two cases (4%), sample 1 and sample 2 were positive for the same bacteria. Isolated microorganisms corresponded to coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) and Propionibacterium acnes. No bacterial growth was observed in sample 3 (p < 0.001). Thus, none of those seven positive cases (0%) were positive after vancomycin soaking (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the series, ACL graft harvesting and manipulation leads to bacterial contamination in 14% of the cases. This contamination is fully eradicated after soaking in the vancomycin solution in this series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.