Comparison of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Dunn View With Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Determine Femoral Version

Ultrasound Can Determine Joint Distraction During Hip Arthroscopy but Fluoroscopic-Guided Portal Placement Is Superior

Purpose

To compare joint distraction measured on ultrasound (US) with joint space width (JSW) measured on fluoroscopy in hip arthroscopy and to determine whether ultrasound guidance is as safe and effective as fluoroscopy, the current gold standard, for establishing arthroscopic portals.

Methods

Cadaveric whole-body specimens were positioned supine and subjected to 60 lbs. of unilateral axial traction using a distal femoral Steinman pin. Joint distraction was measured via JSW on fluoroscopic and ultrasound images. A single, fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon established anterolateral arthroscopy portals via ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance in a randomized sequence. Total procedure time, number of times the spinal needle pierced the capsule, and iatrogenic chondral or labral injury were recorded.

Results

Twelve full-body specimens (20 hips) underwent distraction, and 17 hips underwent portal placement with fluoroscopic (n = 8) or ultrasound (n = 9) guidance. JSW measured on ultrasound was significantly less laterally (13.0 vs 9.2 mm, P < .001), apically (16.7 vs 9.2 mm, P < .001), and medially (17.9 vs 9.2 mm, P < .001). Successful portal entry was achieved in every specimen. Average procedure time was 133 ± 51 seconds for the fluoroscopy group and 371 ± 260 seconds for the ultrasound group (P = .026). Fluoroscopic guidance required significantly less needle insertion attempts at 1.13 compared with 3.33 attempts for ultrasound (P = .022). Labral damage was greater in the ultrasound group at 66.67% compared with 12.50% for fluoroscopy (P = .0497).

Conclusions

Joint distraction measured on ultrasound can be used to subjectively determine if the joint is adequately distracted in hip arthroscopy. Ultrasound-guided portal placement was associated with more needle insertion attempts, iatrogenic injury of the labrum, and overall procedure time in comparison to fluoroscopic guidance.

Clinical Relevance

Fluoroscopy is the gold standard to confirm adequate joint distraction, aid in establishing arthroscopy portals, and evaluate resection of the femoral head during hip arthroscopy but exposes the patient to ionizing radiation, requires additional operators in the operating room, and involves the need for a heavy lead shield. Alternatives to fluoroscopy are needed, but ultrasound has not proven superior in our cadaveric model.

FAI morphology increases the risk for osteoarthritis in young people with a minimum follow-up of 25 years

INTRODUCTION

The mechanical conflict in symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement can lead to early osteoarthritis. However, radiographic impingement morphology is often seen in asymptomatic individuals. Long-term observation regarding the risk of developing osteoarthritis in these individuals is lacking. Our study addressed the following questions: Does femoroacetabular impingement morphology increase the risk for development of osteoarthritis after at least 25 years? If yes, which radiographic parameter is the most predictive? Does the level of activity influence the risk for development of osteoarthritis? Are PROM influenced by the grade of osteoarthritis in this population?

METHODS

We investigated 51 (32 male, 19 female) patients for whom AP pelvis and Dunn view radiographs were available with a minimum follow-up of 25 years. Alpha angle in AP pelvis and Dunn view radiographs, femoral torsion in Dunn view, lateral center edge angle, cross-over sign, posterior wall sign and prominence of ischial spine sign in AP pelvis radiographs were determined. On the follow-up radiographs, osteoarthritis was graded. Tegner Score for the time of the index radiograph was evaluated. Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index were assessed at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 43 years (range 25-58). Cam impingement morphology showed to increase the risk for development of osteoarthritis: Alpha angles of ≥ 55° on AP pelvis and Dunn view radiographs were associated risk factors and showed an OR of 1.05 (p = 0.002) and 1.10 (p = 0.001), respectively. Abnormal femoral torsion and acetabular retroversion were not risk factors for osteoarthritis. Tegner Score at index presentation, HHS and WOMAC Score did not correlate with the grade of osteoarthritis.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that cam impingement morphology in young patients raises the risk for development of hip osteoarthritis by 5-10% in a long-term follow-up with a minimum of 25 years, thus its contribution was small.