Primary Anterolateral Ligament Rupture in Patients Requiring Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Case-Control Magnetic Resonance Imaging Review

Patient Age and Activity Level, Posterior Tibial Slope, and Use of Allograft Are Significant Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To assess the consistency of risk factor reporting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure after primary reconstruction, identify risk factors more frequently associated with ACLR failure, and help clinicians prevent reinjury in patients with risk factors for ACLR failure.

Methods

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used to conduct a systematic review. Initial title and abstract screening yielded 561 studies, from which 76 studies were assessed for eligibility. Thirty-two full-text studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) clinical studies of anterior cruciate ligament injuries; (2) patients undergoing ACLR; (3) clinical outcome data, including failure rate; (4) studies assessing preoperative risk factors for failure; and (5) manuscripts published within the past 6 years. These studies were subdivided into those that defined ACLR failure as revision surgery or graft failure.

Results

Ten risk factors were included in the review for 22 studies defining ACLR failure as revision surgery. Eight risk factors were included in the review for 10 studies defining ACLR failure as graft failure. Posterior tibial slope (PTS) (80%, 4/5 studies), age (79%, 11/14 studies), and graft characteristics (71%, 5/7 studies) such as allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft, high-dose radiation, and BioCleanse preparation technique were the most significant risk factors for revision ACLR. PTS (100%, 2/2 studies) and activity level (67%, 2/3 studies) were the most significant risk factors for graft failure.

Conclusions

Age, PTS, use of allograft, and activity level are significant preoperative risk factors that should be considered when attempting to prevent reinjury in ACLR candidates. Studies investigating risk factors for ACLR failure often fail to control for confounding variables that can influence outcomes.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

Combined Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Results in Better Knee Stability and More Satisfactory Subjective Outcomes in Non-Athlete Patients Undergoing Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background: Consensus has not yet been reached regarding combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ALLR) with revisional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (RACLR). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between patients who underwent isolated RACLR and those who underwent RACLR combined with ALLR. Methods: Between June 2010 and June 2021, 49 patients who underwent RACLR were retrospectively reviewed over a 24-month follow-up. Patients were categorized into the isolated RACLR (n = 37, group 1) or combined ALLR group (n = 12, group 2). Clinical outcomes were evaluated with several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for each PROM. The side-to-side difference (SSD) of the anterior instability was measured. The pivot-shift test was performed. Results: Baseline characteristics showed no differences between the groups. PROMs showed no significant differences between the groups at the 2-year follow-up. Group 2 was superior to group 1 in the MCID achievement rate for Lysholm knee and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores at 24 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, the proportion of IKDC grade A in SSD for anterior laxity was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (58.3% versus [vs.] 18.3%, p = 0.009), and the proportion of pivot-shift grade 0 was also higher in group 2 (66.7% vs. 27.0%, p = 0.013). The "near return to activity" rate was also higher in group 2 than in group 1 (83.3% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.043). Conclusions: Combining ALLR with RACLR in non-athletes results in a higher proportion of patients with less mechanical graft failure and satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Laxity measurement of internal knee rotation after primary anterior cruciate ligament rupture versus rerupture

PURPOSE

The aim of the current study was to objectify the rotational laxity after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction by instrumented measurement. It was hypothesized that knees with recurrent instability feature a higher internal rotation laxity as compared to knees with a primary rupture of the native ACL.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study, Level of evidence III.

METHODS

In a clinical cross-sectional study successive patients with primary ACL rupture and rerupture after ACL reconstruction were evaluated clinically and by instrumented measurement of the rotational and antero-posterior laxity with a validated instrument and the KT1000^®, respectively. Clinical examination comprised IKDC 2000 forms, Lysholm Score, and Tegner Activity Scale. Power calculation and statistical analysis were performed (p value < 0.05).

RESULTS

24 patients with primary ACL rupture and 23 patients with ACL rerupture were included. There was no significant side-to-side difference in anterior translation. A side-to side difference of internal rotational laxity ≥ 10° was found significantly more frequent in reruptures (53.6%) compared to primary ruptures (19.4%; p < 0.001). A highly significant relationship between the extent of the pivot-shift phenomenon and side-to-side difference of internal rotation laxity could be demonstrated (p < 0.001). IKDC 2000 subjective revealed significantly better scores in patients with primary ACL tear compared to patients with ACL rerupture (56.4 ± 7.8 vs. 50.8 ± 6.2; p = 0.01). Patients with primary ACL tears scored significantly better on the Tegner Activity Scale (p = 0.02). No significant differences were seen in the Lysholm Score (p = 0.78).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ACL rerupture feature significantly higher internal rotation laxity of the knee compared to primary ACL rupture. The extend of rotational laxity can be quantified by instrumented measurements. This can be valuable data for the indication of an anterolateral ligament reconstruction in ACL revision surgery.

Editorial Commentary: Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Results in Better Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction for Patients With High-Grade Pivot Shifts

Magnetic resonance imaging of the torn anterior lateral ligament (ALL) is inconsistent and subject to significant intra- and interobserver variability. Like that of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), an ALL tear can vary in degree (first, second, or third) and location (tibial or femoral side). These variations may impact the appropriate surgical intervention. Relevant biomechanical data indicate that the deep iliotibial band fibers are more important than the ALL in controlling pivot shift. Lateral compartment overconstraint after ALL reconstruction does not appear to be a biomechanical or clinical issue. An ALL reconstruction creates a nonisometric construct (tight in extension and lax in flexion), allowing physiologic internal tibial rotation at 90° flexion, whereas lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is more isometric, limiting physiologic internal tibial rotation at 90° flexion. The indications for a combined ACL/ALL reconstruction are evolving, but a Segond fracture and ligamentous hyperlaxity of ≥5 using the modified Beighton system seem reasonable. An ACL/LET reconstruction results in better stability for patients with high-grade pivot shifts.

Correlation Analysis of the Anterolateral Ligament Length with the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Length and Patient's Height: An Anatomical Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical characteristics of the anterolateral ligament of the knee (ALL) with the focus on potential gender differences. The ALL length and the length of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) were taken in extension. The length of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was measured at 120° flexion. We correlated the length of the ALL with the LCL and ACL with respect to potential gender differences. The ALL was significantly (p = 0.044) shorter in females (mean length: 32.8 mm) compared to males (mean length: 35.7 mm). The length of the ALL correlated significantly positively with the lengths of the ACL (p < 0.001) and the LCL (p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation with the total leg length (TLL) (p = 0.888) and body size (p = 0.046). Furthermore, TLL and donor size correlated significantly positively (p < 0.001). The ALL length correlated significantly positively with the ACL and the LCL length. The ALL length did neither correlate with the TLL nor the donor size. This fact may contribute to planning of graft harvesting in the upcoming techniques for ALL reconstruction.

Editorial Commentary: The Anterolateral Ligament Really Exists, Now Show Me How to Find It

The anterior lateral complex is commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. This has been evident since the description of the Segond fracture and by the use of lateral extra-articular tenodesis for ACL injury. Although lateral extra-articular tenodesis has been mostly given up owing to a preference for anatomic ACL reconstructions, it is gaining interest as an adjunct to ACL reconstruction. To determine the need for an anterolateral procedure we need to be able to identify those patients with deficiency in the anterolateral complex. Magnetic resonance imaging is a widely available tool and is typically obtained for every suspected ACL knee injury. Further detailed descriptions of the anterior lateral complex on magnetic resonance imaging can assist in determining accurate indications for anterolateral procedures.