Dynamic Mediolateral Patellar Translation Is a Sex- and Size-Independent Parameter of Adult Proximal Patellar Tracking Using Dynamic 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging

[Influence of the quadriceps muscles on the patellofemoral contact in patients with low flexion patellofemoral instability after MPFL reconstruction]

INTRODUCTION

MPFL reconstruction represents one of the most important surgical treatment options for recurrent patellar dislocations at low flexion angles associated with low flexion patellofemoral instability. Nevertheless, the role of quadriceps muscles in patients with patellofemoral instability before and after patellofemoral stabilization using MPFL reconstruction has not been fully elucidated. The present study investigates the influence of quadriceps muscles on the patellofemoral contact in patients with low flexion patellofemoral instability (PFI) before and after surgical patellofemoral stabilization using MPFL reconstruction using 3 T MRI datasets in early degrees of flexion (0-30°).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, 15 patients with low flexion PFI before and after MPFL reconstruction and 15 subjects with healthy knee joints were studied using dynamic MRI scans. MRI scans were performed in a custom-made pneumatic knee loading device to determine the patellofemoral cartilage contact area (CCA) with and without quadriceps activation (50 N). Comparative measurements were performed using 3D cartilage and bone meshes in 0-30° knee flexion in the patients with patellofemoral instability preoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

The preoperative patellofemoral CCA of patients with low flexion PFI was 67.3 ± 47.3 mm2 in 0° flexion, 118.9 ± 56.6 mm2 in 15° flexion, and 267.6 ± 96.1 mm2 in 30° flexion. With activated quadriceps muscles (50 N), the contact area was 72.4 ± 45.9 mm2 in extension, 112.5 ± 54.9 mm2 in 15° flexion, and 286.1 ± 92.7 mm2 in 30° flexion without statistical significance. Postoperatively determined CCA revealed 159.3 ± 51.4 mm2 , 189.6 ± 62.2 mm2 and 347.3 ± 52.1 mm2 in 0°, 15° and 30° flexion. Quadriceps activation with 50 N showed a contact area in extension of 141.0 ± 63.8 mm2, 206.6 ± 67.7 mm2 in 15° flexion, and 353.5 ± 64.6 mm2 in 30° flexion, also without statistical difference compared with unloaded CCAs. Subjects with healthy knee joints showed an increase of 10.3% in CCA at 30° of flexion (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Although patellofemoral CCA increases significantly after isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with low flexion patellofemoral instability, there is no significant influence of quadriceps muscles either preoperatively or postoperatively.

Patellar Tracking: An Old Problem with New Insights

Patellofemoral pain and instability are common indications for imaging that are encountered in everyday practice. The authors comprehensively review key aspects of patellofemoral instability pertinent to radiologists that can be seen before the onset of osteoarthritis, highlighting the anatomy, clinical evaluation, diagnostic imaging, and treatment. Regarding the anatomy, the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the primary static soft-tissue restraint to lateral patellar displacement and is commonly reconstructed surgically in patients with MPFL dysfunction and patellar instability. Osteoarticular abnormalities that predispose individuals to patellar instability include patellar malalignment, trochlear dysplasia, and tibial tubercle lateralization. Clinically, patients with patellar instability may be divided into two broad groups with imaging findings that sometimes overlap: patients with a history of overt patellar instability after a traumatic event (eg, dislocation, subluxation) and patients without such a history. In terms of imaging, radiography is generally the initial examination of choice, and MRI is the most common cross-sectional examination performed preoperatively. For all imaging techniques, there has been a proliferation of published radiologic measurement methods. The authors summarize the most common validated measurements for patellar malalignment, trochlear dysplasia, and tibial tubercle lateralization. Given that static imaging is inherently limited in the evaluation of patellar motion, dynamic imaging with US, CT, or MRI may be requested by some surgeons. The primary treatment strategy for patellofemoral pain is conservative. Surgical treatment options include MPFL reconstruction with or without osseous corrections such as trochleoplasty and tibial tubercle osteotomy. Postoperative complications evaluated at imaging include patellar fracture, graft failure, graft malposition, and medial patellar subluxation. ^©RSNA, 2023 Quiz questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Change in Descriptive Kinematic Parameters of Patients with Patellofemoral Instability When Compared to Individuals with Healthy Knees-A 3D MRI In Vivo Analysis

BACKGROUND

Patellofemoral instability (PFI) leads to chronic knee pain, reduced performance and chondromalacia patellae with consecutive osteoarthritis. Therefore, determining the exact patellofemoral contact mechanism, as well as the factors leading to PFI, is of great importance. The present study compares in vivo patellofemoral kinematic parameters and the contact mechanism of volunteers with healthy knees and patients with low flexion patellofemoral instability (PFI). The study was performed with a high-resolution dynamic MRI.

MATERIAL/METHODS

In a prospective cohort study, the patellar shift, patella rotation and the patellofemoral cartilage contact areas (CCA) of 17 patients with low flexion PFI were analyzed and compared with 17 healthy volunteers, matched via the TEA distance and sex, in unloaded and loaded conditions. MRI scans were carried out for 0°, 15° and 30° knee flexion in a custom-designed knee loading device. To suppress motion artifacts, motion correction was performed using a moiré phase tracking system with a tracking marker attached to the patella. The patellofemoral kinematic parameters and the CCA was calculated on the basis of semi-automated cartilage and bone segmentation and registrations.

RESULTS

Patients with low flexion PFI showed a significant reduction in patellofemoral CCA for 0° (unloaded: p = 0.002, loaded: p = 0.004), 15° (unloaded: p = 0.014, loaded: p = 0.001) and 30° (unloaded: p = 0.008; loaded: p = 0.001) flexion compared to healthy subjects. Additionally, patients with PFI revealed a significantly increased patellar shift when compared to volunteers with healthy knees at 0° (unloaded: p = 0.033; loaded: p = 0.031), 15° (unloaded: p = 0.025; loaded: p = 0.014) and 30° flexion (unloaded: p = 0.030; loaded: p = 0.034) There were no significant differences for patella rotation between patients with PFI and the volunteers, except when, under load at 0° flexion, PFI patients showed increased patellar rotation (p = 0.005. The influence of quadriceps activation on the patellofemoral CCA is reduced in patients with low flexion PFI.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PFI showed different patellofemoral kinematics at low flexion angles in both unloaded and loaded conditions compared to volunteers with healthy knees. Increased patellar shifts and decreased patellofemoral CCAs were observed in low flexion angles. The influence of the quadriceps muscle is diminished in patients with low flexion PFI. Therefore, the goal of patellofemoral stabilizing therapy should be to restore a physiologic contact mechanism and improve patellofemoral congruity for low flexion angles.

The Influence of Surgical Realignment Procedures on Dynamic Patellar Tracking: A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Controlled Feasibility Study

Persisting patellar maltracking following surgical realignment often remains unseen. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of realignment procedures on patellofemoral kinematics in patients with patellofemoral instability (PFI) and patellofemoral maltracking (PM) by using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Patients planned for surgical patellar realignment due to PFI and a clinically and radiologically apparent PM between December 2019 and May 2022 were included. Patients without PM, limited range of motion, joint effusion, or concomitant injuries were excluded. Dynamic mediolateral translation (dMPT) and patella tilt (dPT) were measured preoperatively and three months postoperatively. In 24 patients (7 men, 17 women; mean age 23.0 years), 10 tibial tubercle transfers, 5 soft tissue patella tendon transfers, 6 trochleoplasties, 3 lateral lengthenings, 1 varizating distal femoral osteotomy (DFO), and 1 torsional DFO were performed. At final follow-up, dMPT (from 10.95 ± 5.93 mm to 4.89 ± 0.40 mm, p < 0.001) and dPT (from 14.50° ± 10.33° to 8.44° ± 7.46°, p = 0.026) were significantly improved. All static radiological parameters were corrected to physiological values. Surgical patellar realignment contributed to the significant improvement of patellofemoral kinematics, with an approximation to normal values. The postoperative application of dynamic MRI allowed for a quantification of the performed correction, allowing for a postoperative control of success.

Development of Real-Time Kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (kMRI) Techniques for Studying the Kinematics of the Spine and Joints in Dogs-Preliminary Study on Cadavers

Simple Summary

Many orthopedic and neurological pathologic conditions can potentially lead to or be affected by joint instability. Standard magnetic resonance imaging, as a static technique that examine joints and body parts in functional rest, can underestimate or overlook key diagnostic findings. As a result, kinematic magnetic resonance imaging techniques were developed to evaluate joints and body parts under stress and load conditions or during movement. In human medicine, the real-time acquisition technique is one of the modalities for acquiring kinematic magnetic resonance imaging, and has gained popularity in recent years. This proof-of-concept study was designed to test the feasibility of real-time acquisition techniques in veterinary medicine for the first time. Based on the results of this preliminary cadaveric study, real-time kinematic magnetic resonance imaging may be a feasible and valuable procedure to be applied to the canine cervical spine and stifle joints. Moreover, given the ease of execution and the concise duration of acquisitions, it could be applied in a regular standard protocol MRI with little additional effort, risk, and cost. In this proof-of-concept study, a good visualization of the canine cervical spine and stifle joint was achieved, showing the potential of real-time acquisition techniques for clinical and research applications.

Abstract

Kinematic MRI (kMRI) is a novel human imaging technique that couples the excellent soft tissue contrast and multiplanar capabilities of traditional MRI with kinematic potential. The study’s goals are: (1) testing the feasibility of spinal cord and joints real-time kMRI; and (2) evaluating the quality of these kinematic studies as a new diagnostic option in veterinary medicine. Standard and real-time kinematic MRI were performed on cervical spine, elbow, and stifle joints of seven cadavers. Studies were repeated after a surgical insult aimed to create a certain degree of joint instability. A total of 56 MRI were performed—7 cervical spinal tracts, 3 elbow joints, and 4 stifle joints were examined. The technique was feasible in all the three regions examined. The images were considered of excellent quality for the stifle joint, good to fair for the cervical spine, whereas two of three elbow studies were considered to have unacceptable image quality. Additionally, real-time kMRI provided good to excellent information about stifle instability. Therefore we consider kMRI a promising technique in veterinary medicine. Further studies and an in vivo setting are needed to increase the quality of the kMRI images, and to fully evaluate clinical usefulness.

Editorial Commentary: Real-Time Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Patellofemoral Joint: Ready for Prime Time?

Real-time dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the musculoskeletal system touts the ability to perceive in vivo joint kinematics, which is particularly attractive for diagnosing dynamic pathologies such as joint instability or impingement syndromes.The clinical utility of dynamic MRI in the musculoskeletal system is wide ranging, from patellofemoral kinematics to imaging of the hip in femoroacetabular impingement and also dynamic spine imaging. Patellofemoral instability is an ideal diagnostic target, as knee flexion and extension are easily performed in an MRI scanner, and dynamic measurements have been correlated to clinical and static radiologic parameters of instability. Proving the clinical utility of this MRI technique requires rigorous technical standardization and definition of normal patellofemoral motion parameters. Validated imaging methods and rigorously defined normal range data are required to light the path forward, and the video format of dynamic MRI is also ideal for advancing patient-centered care, improving patient literacy on their condition, and offering a potential catalyst for shared decision-making between surgeons and their patients.