Tibiofemoral Relationship 3 Weeks After Anatomic Triple-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 10 N of Initial Tension Is Closer to Normal Knee Versus That With 20 N of Initial Tension

Mechanical Evaluation of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Graft Fixation to the Tibia in ACL Reconstruction: Bone Plug Tensioning and Fixation System versus Interference Screw

This study aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties of bone plug fixation to the tibia with a novel device, the Bone plug Tensioning and Fixation (BTF) system.Forty bone-tendon-bone grafts consisting of the whole patella-patellar tendon-tibial bone plug of 10-mm width and tibiae from the porcine were prepared. After creating a 10-mm tibial tunnel, the tibial bone plug was fixed to the tibia with the BTF system or the interference screw (IFS) to prepare a test specimen of the patella-patellar tendon-tibial bone plug fixed to the tibia. For the graft tension controllability study, a predetermined initial tension of 9.8 or 19.6 N was applied and maintained for 5 minutes. Then the bone plug was fixed to the tibia with the BTF system or IFS in 10 specimens, monitoring the residual tension for an additional 5 minutes. Then, a cyclic loading test and a tension-to-failure test were performed.The mean difference between the residual tension and the predetermined tension was significantly smaller in BTF fixation (9.8 N → 10.6 ± 2.2 N; 19.6 N → 18.9 ± 2.1 N) than in IFS fixation (9.8 N → 23.4 ± 7.4 N; 19.6 N → 28.9 ± 11.5 N). The mean displacement of the bone plug after cyclic loading was significantly less in the BTF group (1.2 ± 0.6 mm) than in the IFS group (2.2 ± 1.0 mm; p < 0.01). Stiffness was significantly greater in the BTF group (504.6 ± 148.8 N/mm) than in the IFS group (294.7 ± 96.7 N/mm; p < 0.01), whereas the maximum failure loads in the two groups did not differ significantly (724.2 ± 180.3 N in the BTF and 634.8 ± 159.4 N in the IFS groups).BTF system better performed in graft tension controllability than IFS did. BTF fixation was superior to IFS fixation in the displacement of the bone plug during the cyclic loading test and in stiffness in the tension-to-failure test.

Leaf spring exercise: A safe quadriceps strengthening exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Leg extensions should be avoided in the early stages after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because the force exerted by the quadriceps muscle leads to anterior tibial displacement. To allow for safe quadriceps training in the knee extension range during this period, we devised the leaf spring exercise, which involves placing subjects in the prone position with their knee slightly flexed and instructing them to perform maximum isometric quadriceps contractions while supporting the proximal region of the lower leg's anterior surface and immobilizing the femur's posterior surface to prevent lifting. The current study aimed to examine the safety of Leaf spring exercise by determining the femur-tibia relationship using ultrasound imaging.

METHODS

This controlled laboratory study included patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees (8 men and 8 women; age, 24.2 ± 8.3 years) who were instructed to perform Leaf spring exercise of both lower limbs. We measured the femur-tibia-step-off, which indicates the distance between the last point of the medial and lateral condyles of the femur and posterior margin of the tibial plateau, as a parameter to evaluate anterior tibial displacement via ultrasound diagnostic device. Further, peak torque of the quadriceps muscle was calculated using force measurement device.

FINDINGS

No difference in anterior tibial displacement and peak torque was observed between the uninjured and injured sides during Leaf spring exercise.

INTERPRETATION

Leaf spring exercise may add some strain on the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament; hence, it can be considered a safe quadriceps exercise in the knee extension range.

Editorial Commentary: For Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Graft Fixation Should Be Performed at a Medium Tension in Full Extension: Multiple Bundle Reconstruction May Require a Different Strategy

Successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction requires a multifaceted approach to replicate normal knee anatomy and biomechanics. Graft tensioning force and the angle at which this tension is applied intraoperatively are factors under the surgeon's control. The literature suggests the best tensioning strategy for single bundle reconstructions is at medium tension in full extension, while tensioning multiple bundles is best done at 20° at lower overall tension. Graft tensioning should be individualized with attention paid to graft choice and fixation. Generally, stiffer grafts are thought to require additional force to create the same amount of lengthening. For example, bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts tend to be stiffer than quadrupled hamstring grafts and the native anterior cruciate ligament. Hamstring grafts also are thought to exhibit greater stress relaxation over time, thus elongating and potentially causing increased laxity over time. Pretensioning may eliminate some postoperative graft creep, typically more of an issue with hamstring grafts.