Radiofrequency Ablation in Cooled Monopolar or Conventional Bipolar Modality Yields More Beneficial Short-Term Clinical Outcomes Versus Other Treatments for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Imaging of Peripheral Nerves: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Peripheral nerve imaging provides information that can be critical to the diagnosis, staging, and management of peripheral neuropathies. MRI and ultrasound are the imaging modalities of choice for clinical evaluation of the peripheral nerves given their high soft-tissue contrast and high resolution, respectively. This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes MRI- and ultrasound-based techniques for peripheral nerve imaging; highlights considerations for imaging in the settings of trauma, entrapment syndromes, diffuse inflammatory neuropathies, and tumor; and discusses image-guided nerve interventions, focusing on nerve blocks and ablation.

A critical overview of systematic reviews of radiofrequency ablation for knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

This overview aims to assess the methodological and evidence quality of systematic reviews related to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy was conducted through two independent researchers in eight electronic databases from the inception to September 1, 2024. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed by the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 tool. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool assessed the evidence quality.

RESULTS

Eight systematic reviews were finally included. The results of the methodological quality of the included systematic reviews were generally unsatisfactory. The limitations were a lack of pre-designed protocols, reasons for the inclusion of study types, a list of excluded studies, the consideration of the single study risk of bias, and management of conflicts of interest. A total of 56 outcome indicators were evaluated, with one item receiving a moderate quality rating, while the rest were classified as low or very low. Limitations were identified as the primary factors leading to the downgrade.

CONCLUSIONS

RFA shows efficacy in treating KOA, with tolerable side effects. However, systematic reviews' poor quality indicates cautious interpretation needed. Future studies must enhance quality for robust EBM.

Algofunctional outcome after intra-articular bipolar pulsed radiofrequency ablation for pain in osteoarthritis of the knee: A retrospective study

There is a paucity of research and evidence, regarding the effectiveness of applying bipolar pulsed radiofrequency (bPRF) in osteoarthritis of the knee. This study aimed to search for the impact of intra-articular bPRF (IA-bPRF) on pain, functionality, and quality of life in individuals with advanced knee osteoarthritis. A total of 35 patients experiencing knee pain were included in the study. IA-bPRF was applied at 42 °C temperature, 45 V, with a pulse-width of 20 ms and a frequency of 2 Hz for 3 cycles of 120 seconds. Pain severity was evaluated using the numeric rating scale. Assessment tools included Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Lequesne Algofunctional Index for knee. All measurements were made before the intervention, as well as 2 weeks and 6 months after application of IA-bPRF. Significant improvement was observed in numeric rating scale scores for walking pain from 8.57 ± 0.17 to 4.11 ± 0.35, total WOMAC scores decreased from 75.5 ± 2.71 to 36.7 ± 3.6 and Lequesne Algofunctional Index for knee scores decreased from 18.6 ± 0.70 to 10.4 ± 0.93 by the end of the sixth month (P < .01). WOMAC subgroups for pain, stiffness and functionality, were also significantly lower at the 2nd week and 6th month compared to pre-intervention scores (P < .01). No serious adverse events related to the procedure occurred. IA-bPRF use seems to be safe and effective in relieving pain among individuals with advanced knee osteoarthritis. As a result, with further research, we expect that IA-bPRF may be considered for inclusion in upcoming guidelines for the treatment of chronic pain related to osteoarthritis of the knee.

Innovative approaches in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: comparison of pulsed radiofrequency ablation and surgical intervention

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Pulsed Radiofrequency Ablation (PRFA) and surgery for treating chronic plantar fasciitis, focusing on pain relief and functional outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective study involved 30 patients with chronic plantar fasciitis unresponsive to 12 months of conservative treatment. Patients were divided into PRFA (n = 17) and surgical (n = 13) groups. Clinical evaluations were conducted preoperatively and at three, six and 12 months postoperatively using VAS, AOFAS, FFI, and RMS scores. Radiological measurements assessed foot structure impact.

RESULTS

Both PRFA and surgery significantly reduced pain and improved function. PRFA had a shorter operative time and quicker return to activities (p < 0.001). At 3 months, PRFA showed superior VAS, FFI, and RMS scores (p < 0.05). Long-term outcomes were similar. No major complications occurred, but minor complications were higher in the surgical group (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

PRFA is a minimally invasive, effective treatment for chronic plantar fasciitis with quicker recovery and lower complication rates compared to surgery. Both treatments offer comparable long-term benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Interventional Radiology for Rheumatic Diseases

Imaging plays a key role in the management of rheumatological pathologies, also as guidance for diagnostic and therapeutic interventional procedures, as it can provide better accuracy and safety compared to palpation-guided interventions. Inflammatory and degenerative conditions nonresponsive to systemic treatment may benefit from intra-articular and periarticular administration of drugs, with therapeutic and symptomatic actions or providing a bridge for surgery. Desired effects include reduction of inflammation and pain and improvement of physical function of patients. Training and knowledge of indications, appropriate procedures, contraindications, and side effects are necessary to obtain maximum accuracy and safety in performing interventional procedures.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation practice patterns: A survey study of the International Pain and Spine Interventional Society

Introduction

Chronic knee pain often results from degenerative conditions such as knee osteoarthritis (OA) and can worsen after surgical interventions like total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Knee OA affects approximately 86 million individuals globally, leading to decreased function, mobility limitations, and disability. While TKA is a common surgical treatment for refractory knee OA, though up to 20 % of patients experience chronic post-operative knee pain worse than their pre-operative pain. Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GnRFA) has emerged as a promising intervention for knee OA pain unresponsive to conservative management and for chronic post-TKA pain. GnRFA is an evidence-based technique supported by multiple prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, practice patterns and GnRFA techniques vary, and no peer-reviewed publication has yet quantified these variations in real-world clinical practice.

Objective

This study aims to understand the practice patterns of interventional pain physicians regarding patient selection, use of prognostic blocks, imaging, nerve targets, GnRFA types, and GnRFA techniques in treating knee pain secondary to OA or persistent post-TKA pain.

Methods

An anonymous 29-question survey was distributed via electronic mail to members of the International Pain and Spine Intervention Society (IPSIS) from January 16, 2024, to February 29, 2024. The survey assessed practice patterns related to patient selection, prognostic block use, and GnRFA techniques. Data were collected and stored using REDCap software, with descriptive statistics calculated.

Results

A total of 150 completed surveys were analyzed, representing a completion rate of 2.0 % of surveys sent, 3.5 % of emails opened, and 56.8 % of those who clicked on the survey link. Respondents generally use common selection protocols regarding OA grade (Kelgren-Lawrence 3 and 4), duration of failed conservative care (3-6 months), a single anesthetic block paradigm, and use of fluoroscopic guidance for the GnRFA procedure. More variability was reported between respondents regarding the volume of anesthetic used during prognostic blocks, the threshold to consider a prognostic block "positive," the technology used, and nerves targeted during the GnRFA procedure.

Conclusion

The study provides valuable insights into the current practice patterns of GnRFA among interventional pain physicians. While there is consensus on some aspects of patient selection and procedural techniques, significant variability exists in prognostic block protocols and nerve targets for GnRFA. These findings highlight the need for further research to explore the long-term efficacy and safety of GnRFA and to standardize techniques and protocols across different practice settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life. The low response rate may limit generalizability, and the survey did not include data on active tip sizes used for ablation or whether other procedures should be exhausted before resorting to GnRFA. Additionally, a survey to IPSIS membership only may not fully represent a diverse cohort of pain management specialists, potentially introducing sampling bias. Future studies should include members from a broader range of professional organizations to enhance representativeness.

Successful treatment of a rheumatoid arthritis patient with severe synovial hypertrophy and impaired shoulder function with microwave ablation technique

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory systemic disorder of synovial joints and results in polyarthritis, chronical degeneration, and finally deformities and ankylosis in severe cases. Synovitis and pannus formation are results of inflammatory changes and lead into restriction in joint movement. Shoulders are among the later affected and larger joints and formation of synovitis in early active stages and pannus in later stages might be concluded with frozen shoulder and severe impairment in functionality. These late-term changes cannot be controlled with systemic or local anti-inflammatory agents and synovectomy is chosen in some cases. However, the results are not satisfactory and recurrence is common. In this case report, we presented a case of RA with severe shoulder pain, restricted movement due to synovial hypertrophy, and pannus formation which are resistant to local and systemic interventions and not suitable for surgical or chemical synovectomy. Microwave ablation (MWA) was performed successfully without any complication and she well responded in terms of DAS-28, functional, and pain scores. Range of motion and funcitonal restriction were recovered. This case report describes the use and promising results of MWA in RA with severe synovial hypertrophy and pannus formation even in the absence of active arthritis and effusion. MWA is a safe and minimally invasive technique that can be easily performed in coordinance of rheumatologists and interventional radiologists in proper cases.

Radiofrequency ablation versus intra-articular mesenchymal stem cell injection for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative disease and causes disability, pain and imposes a substantial burden on patients. Conventional treatments for knee OA show limited effectiveness. Consequently, innovative treatments, such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and intra-articular mesenchymal stem cells (IA MSC), have gained attention for addressing these limitations.

OBJECTIVE

We compared the efficacy of RFA and IA MSC for knee OA through a network meta-analysis (NMA).

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and handsearching. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RFA or IA MSC to conventional treatments for knee OA were included. The primary outcomes comprised the pain score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). The clinical outcomes were compared using a frequentist approach, and the treatments were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.

FINDINGS

We included 34 RCTs (n=2371). Our NMA revealed that RFA and IA MSC were significantly more effective than conventional treatments in managing pain at both 3 and 6 months with moderate certainty. Specifically, RFA demonstrated the highest SUCRA values, indicating its superior efficacy. For WOMAC scores, both RFA and MSC showed significant improvements at 3 months, with RFA maintaining its lead at 6 months, although MSC did not display significant superiority at this stage.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that RFA and MSC are resilient treatment options in knee OA. Despite some study heterogeneity, these treatments consistently outperformed conventional treatments, particularly in the short to mid-term, although with varying levels of certainty in their efficacy.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023492299.

Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves for knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and debilitating musculoskeletal condition that significantly affects the quality of life of millions of individuals worldwide. In recent years, cooled radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) has become a viable treatment option for knee OA. This review thoroughly evaluated the existing literature on CRFA therapy for knee OA. It delved into the mechanisms behind CRFA, evaluated its clinical efficacy, and investigated potential avenues for future research and application. The insights gained from this review are crucial for healthcare professionals, researchers, and policymakers, offering an updated perspective on CRFA's role as a viable therapeutic option for knee OA.

The current status of stimuli-responsive nanotechnologies on orthopedic titanium implant surfaces

With the continuous innovation and breakthrough of nanomedical technology, stimuli-responsive nanotechnology has been gradually applied to the surface modification of titanium implants to achieve brilliant antibacterial activity and promoted osteogenesis. Regarding to the different physiological and pathological microenvironment around implants before and after surgery, these surface nanomodifications are designed to respond to different stimuli and environmental changes in a timely, efficient, and specific way/manner. Here, we focus on the materials related to stimuli-responsive nanotechnology on titanium implant surface modification, including metals and their compounds, polymer materials and other materials. In addition, the mechanism of different response types is introduced according to different activation stimuli, including magnetic, electrical, photic, radio frequency and ultrasonic stimuli, pH and enzymatic stimuli (the internal stimuli). Meanwhile, the associated functions, potential applications and developing prospect were discussion.

Can ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves of the knee, be performed without locating corresponding arterial pulsations-a cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

Given the rising prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves (RFA) has emerged as a promising treatment option for knee pain. The knee has an extremely complex and variable innervation with nearly 13 genicular nerves described. The frequently ablated genicular nerves are the superomedial (SMGN), the superolateral (SLGN), and the inferomedial (IMGN) genicular nerves. Conventionally, under ultrasound guidance, these nerves are ablated near the corresponding arterial pulsations, but due to the rich vascular anastomosis around the knee joint, identifying the arteries corresponding to these constant genicular nerves can be tedious unless guided by some bony landmarks. In this study, we have evaluated whether it is possible to accurately target these three genicular nerves by just locating bony landmarks under ultrasound in human cadaveric knee specimens.

METHODS

Fifteen formalin-fixed cadaveric knee specimens were studied. SMGN was targeted 1 cm anterior to the adductor tubercle in the axial view. For SLGN, in the coronal view, the junction of the lateral femoral condyle and shaft was identified, and at the same level in the axial view, the crest between the lateral and posterior femoral cortex was targeted. For IMGN in the coronal view, the midpoint between the most prominent part of the medial tibial condyle and the insertion of the deep fibers of the medial collateral ligament was marked. The medial end of the medial tibial cortex was then targeted at the same level in the axial view. The needle was inserted from anterior to posterior, with an in-plane approach for all nerves. Eosin, 2% W/V, in 0.1 ml was injected. Microdissection was done while keeping the needle in situ. Staining of the nerve was considered a positive outcome, and the percentage was calculated. The nerve-to-needle distance was measured, and the mean with an interquartile range was calculated.

RESULT

The accuracies of ultrasound-guided bony landmarks of SMGN, SLGN, and IMGN were 100% in terms of staining, with average nerve-to-needle distances of 1.67, 3.2, and 1.8 mm respectively.

CONCLUSION

It is with 100% accuracy, that we can perform RFA of SMGN, SLGN, and IMGN under ultrasound guidance, by locating the aforementioned bony landmarks.

Is Radiofrequency Ablation Superior to Intra-Articular Injections for the Treatment of Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis?-A Systematic Review

The radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered a valid, minimally invasive treatment modality for the management of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of RFA with that of commonly used intra-articular injections for the persistent knee pain due to OA. Medline/Pubmed and Scopus databases were systematically searched up to April 2023 to identify studies comparing the effect of RFA and intra-articular injections (IAIs) on knee OA. Nine studies including 899 patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. The RFA procedure was related with improved knee pain relief compared to IAIs at 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up (p < 0.001). Similarly, functional improvement was greater in RFA treatment than that observed after hyaluronic acid (HA), steroid or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections (Visual Analogue Scale p < 0.001, Numeric Rating Scale p = 0.019, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index p = 0.012). The overall procedural complication rate of RFA was 10.2% and was higher than steroid (p = 0.023) and PRP (p = 0.017) injections. However, no severe adverse events were reported. For patients with symptomatic knee OA, RFA seems to be more effective than IAIs in alleviating pain and improving joint function, despite the relatively higher incidence of non-serious adverse events. However, due to the limited number of studies and patients, this result should be interpreted with caution and not be generalized to the entire knee OA population.

Upper limb and lower limb radiofrequency treatments in orthopaedics

Radiofrequency (RF) is a minimally invasive technique for disrupting or altering nociceptive pathways to treat musculoskeletal neuropathic and nociplastic pain. RF has been employed to treat painful shoulder, lateral epicondylitis, knee and hip osteoarthritis, chronic knee pain, Perthes disease, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, plantar fasciitis, and painful stump neuromas; it has also been employed before and after painful total knee arthroplasty and after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The benefits of RF include the following:it is safer than surgery; there is no need for general anaesthesia, thereby reducing adverse effects; it alleviates pain for a minimum of 3-4 months; it can be repeatable if necessary; and it improves joint function and minimizes the need for oral pain medication. RF is contraindicated for pregnant women; unstable joints (hip, knee, and shoulder); uncontrolled diabetes mellitus; presence of an implanted defibrillator; and chronic joint infection (hip, knee, and shoulder). Although adverse events from RF are unusual, potential complications can include infection, bleeding, numbness or dysesthesia, increased pain at the procedural site, deafferentation effect, and Charcot joint neuropathy. Although there is a risk of damaging non-targeted neural tissue and other structures, this can be mitigated by performing the technique under imaging guidance (fluoroscopy, ultrasonography, and computed tomography). RF appears to be a valuable technique for alleviating chronic pain syndromes; however, firm proof of the technique's efficacy is still required. RF is a promising technique for managing chronic musculoskeletal of the limbs pain, particularly when other techniques are futile or not possible.

Joint interventions in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is among the most common diseases affecting both axial and appendicular joints and the lead cause of disability worldwide. OA incidence is rising due to extended life expectancy and the increasing obesity epidemic. Several joint interventions are available to manage pain and joint function in patients with OA, most of these treatments being widely applied using intra-articular injections. In this chapter, we will describe the different joint interventions available for the management of pain in OA focusing on intra-articular injections, including discussion on the evidence regarding the efficacy of these treatments, based on the most recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses available. We also discuss the importance of imaging in guiding these treatments, including the different imaging modalities available for intra-articular injection guidance, their advantages, and disadvantages. Finally, we briefly discuss safety data and the consensus regarding the most used intra-articular treatments to manage pain in OA.

Editorial Commentary: Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee Could Be Indicated for Patients Failing Conventional Nonoperative Treatment and Wishing to Avoid Total Knee Arthroplasty

Patients with knee osteoarthritis are constantly looking for ways to combat their pain and improve their quality of life. As newer treatments present themselves, it is up to the orthopaedic specialists to provide the best treatment possible. Radiofrequency ablation, usually administered by a pain management specialist, has shown to be an acceptable alternative treatment and should be considered in the management of osteoarthritis. It should be considered for patients who have failed nonoperative treatments and are not interested in pursuing total knee arthroplasty, and possibly for patients who have persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty.