Superior Capsular Reconstruction-Technical Marvel or Fading Fashion?

Recentering the humeral head does not necessarily improve glenohumeral abduction: A cadaveric biomechanical study

PURPOSE

To explore if recentering the humeral head could improve shoulder abduction in shoulders with irreparable massive rotator cuff tears (IMRCTs).

METHODS

Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were used to simulate the intact condition and IMRCTs as controls. Four 'recenter' interventions were then sequentially applied: subacromial interposition (SI) using 4- and 8-mm spacers and superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) using two- and four-layer fascia lata grafts. Dynamic biomechanical experiments were performed for each condition. The primary outcomes were glenohumeral abduction angle (GAA). The secondary outcomes were acromiohumeral distance (AHD) and subacromial contact pressure.

RESULTS

In the intact condition, the GAA was significantly greater compared to the IMRCT condition at most deltoid force levels (p < 0.05 for all except at 80 N). IMRCT significantly increased maximum contact pressure (MCP) compared to intact (Δ +0.09 MPa, p = 0.029). For recentering interventions, neither SI nor SCR improved GAA (p > 0.05). The 8-mm spacer and four-layer SCR condition significantly increased MCP compared to the intact condition (Δ +0.22 MPa, p = 0.048, Δ +0.24 MPa, p = 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both SCR and SI could effectively recenter the humeral head, but neither technique improved shoulder abduction, with both even significantly increasing subacromial contact pressures. These findings suggest that surgical goals focusing solely on recentering humeral head may need re-evaluation, particularly, for patients with high functional demands on shoulder abduction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

The Evolution of Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: Current Trends and Future Perspectives

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery has undergone significant advancements over the past decades, transitioning from a primarily diagnostic tool to a comprehensive therapeutic approach. Technological innovations and refined surgical techniques have expanded the indications for arthroscopy, allowing minimally invasive management of shoulder instability and rotator cuff pathology. Methods: This narrative review explores the historical evolution, current trends, and future perspectives in arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Results: Key advancements in shoulder instability management include the evolution of the arthroscopic Bankart repair, the introduction of the remplissage technique for Hill-Sachs lesions, and the development of arthroscopic Latarjet procedures. Additionally, novel techniques such as Dynamic Anterior Stabilization (DAS) and bone block procedures have emerged as promising solutions for complex instability cases. In rotator cuff repair, innovations such as the suture-bridge double-row technique, superior capsular reconstruction (SCR), and biological augmentation strategies, including dermal allografts and bioinductive patches, have contributed to improving tendon healing and functional outcomes. The role of biologic augmentation, including biceps tendon autografts and subacromial bursa augmentation, is also gaining traction in enhancing repair durability. Conclusions: As arthroscopic techniques continue to evolve, the integration of biologic solutions and patient-specific surgical planning will likely define the future of shoulder surgery. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of current state-of-the-art techniques and discusses their clinical implications, with a focus on optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing surgical failure rates.

Calcaneum-Achilles Tendon Allograft for Massive Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Lesion With Bony Deficiency

Dealing with massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears presents intricate challenges. Concerning elder patients, either conservative management or reverse shoulder arthroplasty could be the most appropriate treatment. On the other hand, in younger patients, there is a wide spectrum of solutions, most of them being under evaluation and not completely validated. The complexity increases when a greater tuberosity avulsion occurs at the same time. Regardless of whether surgical fixation is performed, there is a risk for bone resorption, which would result in the posterosuperior cuff's insertion spot loss. In this case, the surgeon is expected to simultaneously manage the bone loss and the tendon tear. The Calcaneum-Achilles Tendon Allograft (CalATA) therefore appears to play an interesting role due to its solid bone-tendon structure. This Technical Note aims to present the CalATA technique, which consists in both tendon and bone deficiency restoration in massive rotator cuff tears with greater tuberosity resorption.

Superior capsular reconstruction for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears

Although the superior portion of the shoulder joint capsule is a clearly distinct structure, its ability to prevent vertical humeral head translation in irreparable rotator cuff tears remains controversial. The clinical results of superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in this context are satisfactory but the radiological outcomes are poor in up to two-thirds of patients. Moreover, there is no proof that SCR is more beneficial than simply doing a subacromial debridement, a partial repair or a tenotomy of the long head of biceps. Furthermore, graft healing is not predictive of success. Given the lack of comparative studies with high level of evidence (level 1 or 2), we cannot conclude that this surgical technique (and its many variants) has a place in our treatment paradigm. Also, it seems that xenografts are no longer being used given the high rate of structural failure seen on MRI and the large number of complications. If the long head of biceps tendon is still intact at the time of surgery, it is a feasible option for SCR given the reasonable cost and minimal complications. If it is not - but the subscapularis tendon is intact or repairable - an allograft or a non-local autograft should be considered, despite its unpredictable clinical results. Surgeons should inform patients of the high rate of radiological repair failure and the worse results if a reverse shoulder arthroplasty should be needed subsequently. Level of evidence: 4.

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstruction Employing Allograft Heals and Functions Well if the Graft Is Sufficiently Thick and Stiff

Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has fallen into disrepute, and the numbers performed appear to be on the decline because it is technically demanding and time-consuming, requires a long postoperative recovery, and does not always heal or function as expected. In addition, two "new kids on the block," the subacromial balloon spacer and the lower trapezius tendon transfer, have emerged as viable alternatives for low-demand patients who cannot tolerate a lengthy recovery and for high-demand patients who lack external rotation strength, respectively. However, carefully selected patients continue to do well after SCR, when surgery is meticulously performed using a graft that is sufficiently thick and stiff. The clinical results and healing rates after SCR using allograft tensor fascia lata are comparable with those after SCR using tensor fascia lata autograft and without donor-site morbidity. Robust comparative clinical study is needed to sort out the optimal graft type and thickness for SCR and the precise indications for each of the surgical treatment options for the irreparable rotator cuff tear, but let's not "throw the baby out with the bathwater" and abandon SCR altogether.

Editorial Commentary: Shoulder Superior Capsular Reconstruction Remains to Be Proven Superior to Partial Repair of the Rotator Cuff for Active Patients With Irreparable Tears and Without Osteoarthritis

The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears in active patients without severe osteoarthritis is challenging. Retracted tears of the superior cuff result in devastating glenohumeral kinematics and decreased shoulder function. Surgical solutions such as superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) or tendon transfers may improve shoulder function. Regarding SCR, the superior capsule has been described as a static stabilizer allowing for the centering of the humeral head. However, some bases for SCR are based on biomechanical studies that should be regarded as time zero, absent healing, and generally oversimplified as ball-and-socket research rather than replicating complex functional shoulder kinematics. SCR may be waning in popularity. SCR using autograft may, or may not, prove effective in the long run. For now, it remains to be seen whether SCR is superior to partial repair of the rotator cuff.