Patients Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy Report Favorable Outcomes at Minimum 10 Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

The THA-10 Score for Predicting Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Contemporary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have identified predictors of total hip arthroplasty (THA) conversion after hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) at short- to midterm follow-up, yet no studies to the authors' knowledge have established a scoring system for predicting THA conversion at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

PURPOSE

To create a scoring system to predict 10-year THA conversion after contemporary HA for FAIS.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected from patients undergoing primary contemporary HA for FAIS, including labral repair, osteoplasty of FAIS deformity, and capsular repair, between January 2012 and October 2013, with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients who underwent THA conversion were compared with patients who achieved 10-year THA-free survivorship. Significant predictors of THA conversion were identified, and predictor weights were assigned to create the THA-10 score. The score was applied to the cohort, and its clinical utility was evaluated. The threshold score with the greatest sensitivity and specificity for predicting 10-year THA conversion was identified.

RESULTS

In total, 280 patients were included; 21 (7.5%) underwent THA conversion by the 10-year follow-up. Patients who underwent THA conversion were of older age (45.4 ± 11.3 vs 33.2 ± 12.1 years; P < .001), had a greater body mass index (28.0 ± 5.2 vs 24.8 ± 4.7 kg/m2; P = .011), and had a greater prevalence of Tönnis grade 1 osteoarthritis (42.9% vs 14.3%; P = .003) and high-grade acetabular (61.9% vs 12.7%; P < .001) and femoral head (33.3% vs 7.3%; P < .001) chondral defects compared with THA-free survivors. After variable weighting, the THA-10 score was established as 1 point for body mass index ≥25 kg/m2, 1 point for Tönnis grade 1, 2 points for age ≥47 years, and 3 points for high-grade defects of the acetabulum or femoral head. The THA-10 score was found to have clinically significant diagnostic value with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.823. Patients scoring ≥4 points were 13.2 times more likely to undergo THA conversion (95% CI, 5.0-35.1; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study created the THA-10 score and showed it to have clinically significant diagnostic utility in predicting 10-year THA conversion after HA for FAIS. Patients scoring ≥4 points were 13.2 times more likely to undergo THA conversion.

Primary Hip Arthroscopy Is Associated With Earlier Achievement of Substantial Clinical Benefit Compared With Revision Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

PURPOSE

To compare time to achievement of clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) between patients undergoing primary and revision hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary and revision HA for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with complete 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sport Subscale (HOS-SSS) were identified. Revision patients were propensity matched 1:4 to primary patients with HA, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Time to achievement of minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were compared alongside cumulative CSO achievement at 6, 12, and 24 months. Hazard ratios (HRs) for predictors of earlier CSO achievement were identified with multivariate Cox regressions.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with revision HA were propensity-matched to 200 patients with primary HA of similar age, sex, and BMI. Patients with primary HA demonstrated a greater prevalence of regular preoperative physical activity (87% vs 59%, P < .001). Patients with primary HA showed significantly greater SCB achievement for HOS-ADL at 6, 12, and 24 months (P < .001) and significantly greater SCB achievement for HOS-SSS at 12 and 24 months (P ≤ .001) compared with patients with revision HA. Patients with primary HA achieved SCB for HOS-ADL (P < .001) and HOS-SSS (P = .015) quicker than patients with revision HA. Predictors of earlier CSO achievement included preoperative PRO score (HR 0.98-1.02, P ≤ 0.007), lower BMI (HR 0.97, P = .038), presence of physical activity (HR 1.51, P = .038), and absence of revision status (HR 0.52-0.56, P ≤ .019).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with primary HA showed a quicker time to SCB achievement for HOS-ADL and HOS-SSS compared with patients with revision HA. Preoperative PRO score, lower BMI, regular physical activity, and primary HA status predicted earlier CSO achievement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative series.

ChatGPT Provides Satisfactory but Occasionally Inaccurate Answers to Common Patient Hip Arthroscopy Questions

PURPOSE

To assess the ability of ChatGPT to answer common patient questions regarding hip arthroscopy, and to analyze the accuracy and appropriateness of its responses.

METHODS

Ten questions were selected from well-known patient education websites, and ChatGPT (version 3.5) responses to these questions were graded by 2 fellowship-trained hip preservation surgeons. Responses were analyzed, compared with the current literature, and graded from A to D (A being the highest, and D being the lowest) in a grading scale on the basis of the accuracy and completeness of the response. If the grading differed between the 2 surgeons, a consensus was reached. Inter-rater agreement was calculated. The readability of responses was also assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES) and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL).

RESULTS

Responses received the following consensus grades: A (50%, n = 5), B (30%, n = 3), C (10%, n = 1), D (10%, n = 1). Inter-rater agreement on the basis of initial individual grading was 30%. The mean FRES was 28.2 (± 9.2 standard deviation), corresponding to a college graduate level, ranging from 11.7 to 42.5. The mean FKGL was 14.4 (±1.8 standard deviation), ranging from 12.1 to 18, indicating a college student reading level.

CONCLUSIONS

ChatGPT can answer common patient questions regarding hip arthroscopy with satisfactory accuracy graded by 2 high-volume hip arthroscopists; however, incorrect information was identified in more than one instance. Caution must be observed when using ChatGPT for patient education related to hip arthroscopy.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given the increasing number of hip arthroscopies being performed annually, ChatGPT has the potential to aid physicians in educating their patients about this procedure and addressing any questions they may have.

Identifying Independent Predictors of Achieving Clinically Significant Outcomes After Contemporary Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) have been shown to achieve clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) at high rates. However, limited studies, to date, have identified independent predictors of achieving CSOs at a minimum 10-year follow-up, and even fewer studies have reported on patients treated with contemporary hip arthroscopic techniques, including chondrolabral preservation, surgical correction of FAIS morphology, and capsular repair.

PURPOSE

To identify independent predictors of achieving minimum 10-year CSOs after contemporary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS with chondrolabral preservation, surgical correction of FAIS morphology, and capsular repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary contemporary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS between January 2012 and November 2013 with a minimum 10-year follow-up were identified. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) collected included scores for the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, modified Harris Hip Score, and visual analog scale for pain. Cohort-specific thresholds for the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) were determined, and achievement rates were recorded. Patients achieving and not achieving each CSO for any PRO measure were compared. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of achieving the MCID, PASS, and SCB for any PRO measure, with the odds ratio (OR) recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up were included in this study. The mean age was 33.8 ± 12.3 years, and the mean body mass index was 25.0 ± 4.8 kg/m2. Most patients were female (60.2%). The reoperation-free survivorship rate was 85.0%. Achievement rates for the MCID, PASS, and SCB were 91.4%, 77.6%, and 71.6%, respectively. Independent predictors of achieving CSOs were age (OR, 0.97-0.98; P ≤ .039), sport participation (OR, 1.84-2.18; P ≤ .042), psychiatric history (OR, 0.46-0.47; P ≤ .041), and high-grade chondral defects (OR, 0.25-0.39; P ≤ .019).

CONCLUSION

Independent predictors of achieving 10-year CSOs after contemporary hip arthroscopic surgery with chondrolabral preservation, surgical correction of FAIS morphology, and capsular repair were younger age, the presence of sport participation, the absence of a psychiatric history, and the absence of chondral defects.

Staged Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Repair, Femoroplasty, and Capsular Plication Followed by Periacetabular Osteotomy for Hip Dysplasia Results in Improved Outcomes and 100% Survivorship at Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs), clinically significant outcomes (CSOs), and survivorship after staged hip arthroscopy with labral repair, femoroplasty, and capsular plication followed by periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for the management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and hip dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle ≤25°).

METHODS

A prospectively maintained database was queried to retrospectively identify patients who underwent staged primary hip arthroscopy and PAO between January 2018 and October 2021 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. PROs collected included Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living/Sports Subscale, international Hip Outcome Tool-12 item questionnaire, and visual analog scale for pain. CSO achievement for minimal clinical important difference and patient acceptable symptom state was determined through cohort-specific thresholds. Rates of reoperation, including, revision hip arthroscopy, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty were evaluated to determine short-term survivorship.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine hips met criteria for inclusion, of which 35 hips had minimum 2-year follow-up (89.7% compliance). Mean age was 25 ± 9.1 years, and 91.7% of patients were female. Respective pre- and postoperative radiographic outcomes were alpha angle 59.8° ± 5.9° to 39.7° ± 2.6°, Tönnis angle 14.6° ± 5.6° to -1.0° ± 2.9°, lateral center-edge angle 16.6° ± 5.5° to 36.6° ± 4.6°, and anterior center-edge angle 15.6° ± 9.1° to 36.1° ± 3.8°, with statistically significant differences pre- to postoperatively for all (P < .001). Patients demonstrated a significant improvement in all PROs pre- to postoperatively (P0. ≤ .004). Minimal clinical important difference and patient acceptable symptom state achievement rates for any PRO were 93.9% and 78.8%, respectively. There were no revision hip surgeries or conversion to total hip arthroplasty at a mean 2.7 ± 1.0-year follow-up. Four patients (11.1%) underwent hardware removal. One patient (2.8%) experienced a postoperative infection treated with incision and drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

Staged hip arthroscopy and PAO for the management of hip dysplasia demonstrated improvement in PROs, high CSO achievement rates, and 100% survivorship at minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Primary and Revision Hip Arthroscopy in Borderline Hip Dysplasia Shows Comparable Outcomes at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs), achievement of clinically significant outcomes, and reoperation-free survivorship between primary and revision hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in propensity-matched borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) patients at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with BHD, characterized by a lateral center-edge angle 18° to 25°, who underwent HA for FAIS with capsular repair by a single surgeon between January 2012 and June 2018 with a minimum 5-year follow-up were identified. Cases of revision HA were propensity-matched 1:2 to cases of primary HA, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index. A 1:2 ratio was chosen to maximize the number of included patients. Collected PROs included Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living and Sport Subscales, International Hip Outcome Score 12, modified Harris Hip Score, and Visual Analog Scale for Pain. Achievement of minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptom state, and substantial clinical benefit for any measured PRO was compared between groups along with reoperation-free survivorship using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-six revision HA hips (34 patients) were propensity-matched to 72 primary HA hips (70 patients). The groups were similar in age (31.5 ± 10.3 years vs 30.5 ± 11.2, P = .669), sex (69.4% female vs 70.8%, P = .656), and body mass index (25.7 ± 4.0 vs 25.5 ± 3.7, P = .849). The revision group showed a greater prevalence of prolonged preoperative pain (50.0% vs 27.8%, P = .032) compared with the primary group. A significant improvement in all PROs was observed for both groups with comparable PROs preoperatively and at the 5-year follow-up between groups (P ≥ .086). The revision and primary groups showed comparable minimal clinically important difference (95.0% vs 95.7%, P ≥ .999), patient acceptable symptom state (80.0% vs 83.6%, P = .757), and substantial clinical benefit (62.5% vs 70.7%, P = .603) achievement for any PRO. Comparable reoperation-free survivorship was observed (P = .151).

CONCLUSIONS

Propensity-matched patients with BHD undergoing primary and revision hip arthroscopy for FAIS achieved similar minimum 5-year PROs, clinically significant outcomes, and reoperation-free survivorship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Female Sex Increases Susceptibility for the Negative Impacts of Advanced Age and Obesity on Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes 10 Years after Primary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and reoperation rates in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) over a minimum 10-year follow-up stratified by sex, age, and body mass index (BMI).

METHODS

Primary hip arthroscopies performed for FAIS between 2010 and 2013, with a minimum 10-year follow-up, were reviewed. Procedures consisting of microfracture, or labral debridement without repair, were excluded. Ten-year PROs were assessed using the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). Patients were categorized into three groups by age (<30, 30-44, >45 years) and BMI (<25.0, 25.0-29.9, ≥ 30). Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was set to half the preoperative standard deviation of the cohort. Reoperation rates and PROs were compared, and regression analysis identified independent predictors of PROs.

RESULTS

At minimum 10-year follow-up (mean: 11.6 [10.0-13.9] years), 59.2% follow-up was achieved, representing 154 hips (141 patients). The cohort had a mean age of 38.5 years, BMI of 24.4, and was 68.2% female. At follow-up, 91.6% of the cohort achieved MCID with a 9.7% reoperation rate. In the middle-aged group, males had higher mHHS (mean: 92.8 vs 85.2; P = .015) and NAHS (mean: 91.6 vs 83.4; P = .008) scores compared to females. In the BMI ≥30 group, males had higher mHHS (mean: 83.3 vs 66.4; P = .030) and NAHS scores (mean: 83.0 vs 58.5; P = .035). Only 72.7% of females with BMI ≥30 achieved MCID for mHHS and NAHS, compared to BMI <25 (96.6% and 94.9%, respectively) and 25-29.9 (87.5% and 83.3%) (mHHS: P = .016; NAHS: P = .038). Similarly, 78.8% of females aged ≥45 achieved MCID for NAHS, compared to 92.9% of those aged <30 and 97.1% of those 30-44 (P = .040). Multivariable regression identified older age (mHHS: P = .019; NAHS: P = .042) and higher BMI (mHHS: P = .007; NAHS: P < .001) as independently predictive of worse 10-year PROs.

CONCLUSION

Older age and greater BMI independently predicted poorer long-term functional outcomes after hip arthroscopy for FAIS. Female sex, while not independently predictive, may make patients more susceptible to the negative effects of older age and BMI. No significant association was observed for reoperation rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.

Quadratus Lumborum Block Provides Similar or Reduced Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption Compared to Control Following Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the quadratus lumborum (QL) block is associated with reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

A search following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases to identify comparative studies of patients undergoing the QL block before hip arthroscopy. The primary outcomes of interest included postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

RESULTS

Eight studies (5 randomized, 3 nonrandomized) with 274 patients receiving the QL block were included. Control groups included no block (3 studies), sham block (2 studies), pericapsular injection of anesthetic (1 study), lumbar plexus block (1 study), and femoral nerve/fascia iliaca block (1 study). In 1 randomized and 2 nonrandomized studies, the pain scores were significantly lower, at all postoperative time points, in the QL block versus sham, no block, and femoral nerve/fascia iliaca control groups. The same 3 studies reported significantly less opioid consumption in the QL group at all measured postoperative time points. The remaining 5 studies reported mostly no significant differences in pain scores and opioid consumption at multiple postoperative time points. In no study did the QL block group have significantly more pain or opioid consumption relative to the control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to a variety of control groups, the QL block provides similar or reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level I and III studies.

Return-to-sports criteria used by professional team physicians in elite athletes after hip arthroscopy - a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to explore currently utilized readiness to Return to Sport (RTS) criteria after Hip Arthroscopy (HA) used in elite athletes to gain novel insights into the RTS decision-making process of professional team physicians. The authors hypothesized that even among this group of highly specialized physicians, there exists variability of measures and criteria used to determine RTS after HA.

METHODS

A total of 15 qualitative semi-structured interviews with professional team physicians were conducted by a single trained interviewer. The interviews were used to identify team physician concepts and themes regarding the criteria used to determine RTS after HA. Themes and sub-themes were identified using a general inductive analysis and a coding process. A hierarchical approach in coding helped to link themes.

RESULTS

Four key themes and several subordinate themes were identified from the interviews that seem to influence the return to sports decision. The most important RTS criteria were muscle strength (especially symmetric hip strength and muscle bulk with low side-to-side variance compared to the contralateral side) followed by pain-free sport-specific activity (pain-free drill skills and play at a lower level), physical examination (with major emphasis on the absence of hip pain with a painless hip range of motion compared to the contralateral side), and functional testing (including full squats, Ober test, FABER test, and pain-free FADIR position).

CONCLUSION

Besides objective findings, including muscle strength, we identified time after surgery as well as subjective findings, including absence of pain and feedback of clinical team members that influence RTS decision after HA. We showed that even among specialized professional team physicians, the main criteria to RTS in these categories were not consistent necessitating the further development of specific RTS guidelines.

Patients With Dysplasia Achieve Similar Outcomes and Survivorship to Nondysplastic Patients 10 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term outcomes of hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in the presence of concomitant lateral rim dysplasia compared with a matched control group.

METHODS

Patients undergoing HA between January 2009 and October 2013 with minimum 10-year follow-up were reviewed. The inclusion criteria consisted of patients undergoing HA for FAI with evidence of lateral rim dysplasia (lateral-center edge angle [LCEA] < 25°). Patients with lateral rim dysplasia were matched to patients with an LCEA greater than 30° based on sex, Tönnis grade, and age. Outcomes included survival (avoidance of total hip replacement [THR]), repeated HA, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Survivorship was assessed using a Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test, whereas revision rates between groups were assessed using χ2 analysis. Between- and within-group analyses of PROs were conducted using the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed rank test, respectively. The proportion of cases achieving the patient acceptable symptom state was compared between groups using χ2 analysis.

RESULTS

This study comprised 46 dysplasia cases and 90 control cases. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in baseline metrics apart from the LCEA (P < .001), Sharp angle (P < .001), and Tönnis angle (P < .001). By 10 years postoperatively, 9% of dysplasia cases and 4% of control cases underwent conversion to THR. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in survival or revision rates. Both groups reported improvements in PROs, and there was no difference between PRO scores at either time point. Excluding cases that underwent THR, 84% and 83% of dysplasia and control cases, respectively, achieved the patient acceptable symptom state.

CONCLUSIONS

HA for symptomatic FAI is a successful treatment in cases in which dysplasia is present. Low complication rates, comparable outcomes to cases without lateral rim dysplasia, and a high survivorship rate of 91% at minimum 10-year follow-up are observed. Increasing Tönnis angle preoperatively may increase the risk of THR conversion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective cohort study.

Efficacy of iliopsoas plane block for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: a prospective, triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative stretching of the hip joint capsule often generates severe pain during the first 3 hours after hip arthroscopy. The short-lived severe pain mandates high opioid consumption, which may result in adverse events and delay recovery. The femoral nerve nociceptors are located anteriorly in the hip joint capsule. A femoral nerve block reduces pain and opioid demand after hip arthroscopy. It impedes, however, ambulation and home discharge after outpatient surgery. The iliopsoas plane block selectively anesthetizes the femoral sensory nerve branches innervating the hip joint capsule without compromising ambulation. We aimed to assess reduction of opioid consumption after iliopsoas plane block during the short-lived painful postsurgical period of time after hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

In a randomized, triple-blind trial, 50 patients scheduled for hip arthroscopy in general anesthesia were allocated to active or placebo iliopsoas plane block. The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first three postoperative hours in the postanesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes included pain, nausea, and ability to ambulate.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were analyzed for the primary outcome. The mean 3-hour intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in the iliopsoas plane block group was 10.4 mg vs 23.8 mg in the placebo group (p<0.001). No intergroup differences were observed for the secondary outcomes during the postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

An iliopsoas plane block reduces opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy. The reduction of opioid consumption during the clinically relevant 3-hour postsurgical period of time was larger than 50% for active versus placebo iliopsoas plane block in this randomized, triple-blind trial.

Hip Arthroscopy Patients With Lower Back Pain Show Delayed Clinical Improvement and Inferior Time-Dependent Survivorship: A Propensity Matched Study at Mid-Term Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship at mid-term follow-up after hip arthroscopy (HA) for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with and without preoperative lower back pain (LBP).

METHODS

Patients with self-endorsed preoperative LBP who underwent HA for FAIS with mid-term follow-up were identified and propensity matched 1:1 to patients without back pain by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). PROs collected preoperatively and at postoperative years 1, 2, and 5 included Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain. Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were compared. Survivorship was compared with Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 119 patients with LBP were matched to 119 patients without LBP. Group demographic factors were as follows: age (37.4 ± 11.9 vs 37.6 ± 12.6 years, P = .880), sex (64.4% vs 67.7% female, P = .796), and BMI (25.3 ± 5.1 vs 25.3 ± 5.4, P = .930). Average follow-up duration was 6.0 ± 1.9 years. LBP patients showed similar preoperative PROs, yet lower 1-year scores for all PROs (P ≤ .044). At final follow-up, similar PROs were shown between groups (P ≥ .196). LBP and non-LBP patients had similar MCID achievement for HOS-ADL (59.3% vs 63.1%, P = .640), HOS-SS (73.9% vs 70.8%, P = .710), mHHS (66.7% vs 73.4%, P = .544), iHOT-12 (85.1% vs 79.4%, P = .500), and VAS Pain (75.6% vs 69.9%, P = .490). Groups also had similar PASS achievement for HOS-ADL (63.5% vs 61.3%, P = .777), HOS-SS (57.0% vs 62.5%, P = .461), mHHS (81.9% vs 79.1%, P = .692), iHOT-12 (54.6% vs 61.2%, P = .570), and VAS Pain (51.0% vs 55.4%, P = .570). Additionally, achievement of MCID ≥ 1 PRO (P ≥ .490) and PASS ≥ 1 PRO (P ≥ .370) was similar across groups. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty occurred in 3.4% of hips with LBP and 0.8% of hips without LBP (P = .370). Back pain patients demonstrated inferior time-dependent survivorship compared with patients without back pain on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with LBP achieve comparable PROs and clinically significant outcomes to patients without back pain at mid-term, despite lower 1-year PRO scores. LBP patients show inferior reoperation-free time-dependent survivorship compared with those without LBP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Cartilage Defects Are Negatively Associated With Long-Term Hip Survivorship Following Contemporary Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To identify the timing and risk factors associated with secondary surgery following primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) at 10-year minimum follow-up.

METHODS

A prospectively collected clinical repository was evaluated for cases of primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and February 2013 with minimum 10-year follow-up. Patients who underwent secondary surgery were propensity matched 1:4 to patients who did not undergo secondary surgery, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). The groups were compared on demographics, radiographs, intraoperative findings, operative procedures, and patient-reported outcomes. A Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve was generated. Among the reoperation-free survivors, minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) achievement were recorded for Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific (HOS-SS) subscales, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), 12-item international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain).

RESULTS

Twenty-four reoperation patients (67% female; age 40.1 ± 14.3 years; BMI 27.2 ± 5.5) were matched to 96 reoperation-free patients (62% female; age 37.0 ± 10.8 years; BMI 25.2 ± 4.7, P ≥ .111). Mean follow-up was 10.3 ± 0.2 years. No preoperative demographic differences were found between groups. The reoperation group showed more high-grade cartilage defects on the acetabulum and femoral head (33% vs 8%, P = .004; 29% vs 7%, P = .007). A bimodal distribution of time to reoperation was evidenced independent of the secondary surgery performed. Among the reoperation-free survivors, MCID and PASS achievement was as follows: HOS-ADL (69.1%, 62.1%), HOS-SS (69.9%, 74.4%), mHHS (73.3%, 58.1%), iHOT-12 (n/a, 63.8%), and VAS-Pain (80.2%, 62.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients requiring reoperation following primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS demonstrated more severe cartilage defects and a bimodal distribution of time to reoperation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative case series.

Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome in High-Level Athletes: A 10-Year Follow-up

Background

Arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has previously been reported to have favorable short-term results in high-level athletes. Less is known about long-term outcomes.

Purpose

To report outcomes 10 years after hip arthroscopy for FAIS in high-level athletes using validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between November 2011 and January 2013 were included in a local hip arthroscopy registry and completed preoperative PROMs. At 10-year follow-up, the same PROMs were completed. Inclusion criteria were age <40 years at time of surgery, no prior hip surgeries, and a pre-symptomatic Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) level of 7 or 8. The exclusion criterion was total hip arthroplasty at follow-up. The PROMs included the international Hip Outcome Tool-12 items (iHOT-12), the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for overall hip function, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) and European Quality of Life-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), HSAS, and a single question on patient satisfaction. The rates of patients achieving minimal important change and reporting Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were reported for HAGOS and iHOT-12. For iHOT-12, preoperative results were compared with 1, 5, and 10-year follow-ups.

Results

A total of 45 patients (34 men, 11 women; 70 hips; mean age 24.4 years at time of surgery) were included, with 77 patients eligible for inclusion. Significant improvements (P < .001) were seen at 10-year follow-up in all HAGOS subscales: Symptoms, Pain, Daily Activity, Sports, Physical Activity, Quality of Life (50.3 vs 78.6, 59.2 vs 86.8, 65.9 vs 88.8, 37.1 vs 81.1, 24.4 vs 81.1, 32.1 vs 79.3), iHOT-12 (40.1 vs 81.6), EQ-5D (0.59 vs 0.89), EQ-VAS (65.6 vs 80.4), and VAS for overall hip function (48 vs 79). For iHOT-12, the largest change was seen between preoperative and 1-year follow-up values, with consistent results over time. There was no statistically significant difference between HSAS levels preoperatively and at 10-year follow-up (HSAS level 4), with 24% of patients reporting a HSAS level 7 or 8 at the follow-up. Of the patients, 93% reported satisfaction with the surgery. PASS was achieved in 82% for iHOT-12, with a range of 76% to 91% for HAGOS subscales. Furthermore, 93% exceeded the minimal important change for iHOT-12, and a range of 67% to 84% for HAGOS.

Conclusion

In a high-level athletic population, significant improvements in long-term outcomes are reported after hip arthroscopy for FAIS, with patients reporting a high satisfaction rate. The results also show that the largest improvement occurs within the first postoperative year, with results being maintained for 10 years.

Ten-Year Outcomes in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older After Primary Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement With Labral Repair

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic labral repair has been shown to result in favorable short- and midterm outcomes; however, the durability of outcomes specifically in older patients remains underreported.

PURPOSE

To (1) report prospectively collected hip preservation rates and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a minimum 10-year follow-up in patients aged ≥40 years after primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair and (2) perform a matched analysis comparing patients aged ≥40 years with patients aged <40 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed on all patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between February 2008 and December 2011. Patients aged ≥40 years who underwent labral repair were included. Preoperative and minimum 10-year follow-up scores were collected for multiple PROMs. Propensity score matching was utilized to compare these patients with a cohort of patients <40 years.

RESULTS

Of the 113 hips eligible, 91 hips (80.5%) on 85 patients (6 bilateral) had a minimum 10-year follow-up. There were 58 women (68%) and 27 men (32%) with a mean age and body mass index of 47.8 years and 25.8, respectively. The hip preservation rate for patients aged ≥40 years was 78%, with 20 patients requiring arthroplasty during the study period. There was significant improvement in all PROMs from baseline to minimum 10-year follow-up with high rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State clinical outcome thresholds. In total, 69 patients aged ≥40 years were propensity matched to 107 patients <40 years. Patients ≥40 tended to have a lower hip preservation rate (81.2% vs 91.6%; P = .06), while patients in the younger cohort had significantly higher rates of secondary hip arthroscopy (14% vs 3%; P = .02). Improvement in PROMs was comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients ≥40 years who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair demonstrated a hip preservation rate of 78%, significant and durable improvement in PROMs, and high rates of satisfaction at a minimum 10-year follow-up. Matched analysis with patients <40 years revealed comparable improvement in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups, with a tendency to a higher level of arthroplasty in patients ≥40 years.

Editorial Commentary: Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Underestimate Hip Femoral Version Versus Computed Tomography Scan: Both May Be Optimized Using 3-Dimensional Imaging

Hip arthroscopy has become increasingly popular in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Careful preoperative planning including evaluation of acetabular and femoral version is necessary to optimize outcomes. Increased femoral anteversion has been associated with microinstability, and conversely, decreased femoral version may predispose to impingement. Computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for femoral version measurements and preoperative planning. However, with recent advancements in technology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown comparable measurements to CT imaging. In terms of advantages and disadvantages, CT requires radiation, albeit "low dose." MRI has a longer acquisition time, and movement of the patient may affect image quality and subsequent accuracy. MRI generally underestimates true version, probably as a result of patient positioning. Three-dimensional imaging could resolve this issue and may become the gold standard for both CT and MRI.

Outcomes of Painful Hips After Hip Arthroscopy Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement

The benefits of hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement are well-established. Hip arthroscopic surgery rates have risen dramatically over the last decade. Some patients, however, may continue to experience hip symptoms after surgery and are dissatisfied with their inability to return to desired optimal activity levels. The purpose of the study is to understand the long-term outcomes of patients with painful hips after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. This is a retrospective study of the outcomes of painful hips after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement, with four to 14-year follow-up from 2008 to 2022. A total of 84 hip arthroscopies were performed. Most of the patients had labral tear debridement and shaving of the aspherical femoral head also known as cam lesion, and five patients had repair for labral tear. There were eight patients who had bilateral hip involvement. There were 27 men and 57 females between the second to fifth decades. The electronic patient's records and radiological images were reviewed, and patient outcomes were graded as pain-free hip (asymptomatic) or painful hip (persistent pain and symptoms of instability). After hip arthroscopy surgery, 55% (46) of hips were graded pain-free in patients who were mostly in their 20s and 30s, while 45% (38) of hips had persistent pain. These patients were in their third or fifth decade. In the painful hip cohort, 33 patients had one hip arthroscopic surgery, while five patients had multiple repeat hip arthroscopies in the same hip over a three to six-year period. Bilateral hip arthroscopies were performed at different times in eight patients of which five individuals experienced painful hip outcomes. There were seven females and one male in their 30s and 40s. The labral tear was repaired in five patients, and two patients had painful hip outcomes. Both were females in their 20s and 30s. Patients with chronic painful hips after hip arthroscopic surgery were investigated to identify the cause of the pain. If no cause was established, then they were finally referred to pain specialist clinicians for pain management. This cohort had seven patients between 28 and 43 years. Six were female and one was male. Total hip replacement (THR) was performed in four patients (4.7%). Conversely, 95.3% of patients did not need THR during the study period of 14 years. Hip arthroscopy can be an effective treatment for femoroacetabular impingement. Careful patient selection and a holistic approach are vital for a good patient outcome. The success rate of the pain-free hip after hip arthroscopy decreases with increasing age of the patient, particularly in the female gender. Patients with grade II and more degenerative chondral changes do not perform well. Patients in their fourth and fifth decade can benefit from hip arthroscopy provided a comprehensive discussion of the expected outcomes is conducted prior to surgery. Overall, hip arthroscopy remains a valuable tool, but it is important to be conscious of its limitations and potential challenges.

Association of Patient Satisfaction 2 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Minimum 10-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes and Survivorship

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that short-term outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) predict midterm outcomes, but a limited number of studies have evaluated whether short-term outcomes predict long-term outcomes and survivorship.

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether achieving clinically significant outcomes at 2 years after hip arthroscopy for FAIS can predict patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship at 10 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS between June 2012 and December 2012 with a minimum 10-year follow-up were identified. Using previously established thresholds, we classified patients who achieved the 2-year Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the visual analog scale (VAS) for satisfaction as the high satisfaction group and patients who did not as the low satisfaction group. Minimum 10-year PROs were then compared between the groups, including scores for the Hip Outcome Score (HOS)-Activities of Daily Living and -Sports Specific, the modified Harris Hip Score, the VAS for pain, and the VAS for satisfaction. Reoperation-free survivorship was compared.

RESULTS

Of 120 eligible consecutive patients, 85 patients were included (70.8% follow-up rate), of whom 61.2% were female. The mean age was 34.0 ± 12.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 25.4 ± 4.6. Of the 85 patients, 29 (34.1%) did not achieve PASS for the VAS for satisfaction at 2 years postoperatively compared with 56 (65.9%) who did. The low satisfaction group had significantly worse acetabular chondral grades at the time of surgery (P = .008). At minimum 10-year follow-up, the high satisfaction group showed significantly better HOS-Activities of Daily Living, HOS-Sports Specific, modified Harris Hip Score, VAS pain, and VAS satisfaction scores (P≤ .031). Compared with the low satisfaction group, the high satisfaction group had a significantly lower rate of secondary surgery (1.8% vs 24.1%, respectively; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Patients who achieved PASS for the VAS for satisfaction at 2 years after hip arthroscopy demonstrated superior minimum 10-year outcomes compared with patients who did not, including greater PRO scores and a higher survivorship rate. The high satisfaction group had lower grade acetabular cartilage damage at the time of surgery compared with those who did not achieve PASS for the VAS for satisfaction at 2 years.

Primary Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia: A Systematic Review of Published Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopy in patients with borderline hip dysplasia has satisfactory outcomes at short-term follow-up; however, the data on midterm outcomes are inconsistent, and failure rates are high in some studies, limiting understanding of the role and utility of hip arthroscopy in this patient cohort.

PURPOSE

To provide an up-to-date, evidence-based review of the clinical outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy in patients with frank or borderline hip dysplasia at ≥5-year follow-up and report the failure rate and progression to total hip arthroplasty in this cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy in patients with lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <25° at ≥5-year follow-up. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies scoring system. Level of evidence was determined using criteria from the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in this review. Patients with LCEA <25° demonstrated satisfactory clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and significant postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at follow-up ranging from a ≥5 to 10 years. Studies comparing patients with dysplasia to those without did not demonstrate significant differences in preoperative, postoperative, or delta PROs or in failure, reoperation, or revision rates. There was no overall significant correlation between outcomes and LCEA stratification.

CONCLUSION

Hip arthroscopy in carefully selected patients with LCEA <25° can be successful at mid- to long-term follow-up and may provide clinical outcomes and failure rates comparable with patients with normal LCEA, understanding that this is a singular, 2-dimensional radiographic measure that does not differentiate instability from impingement or combinations thereof, warranting future studies delineating these differences. These findings suggest that hip dysplasia may not be an absolute contraindication for isolated hip arthroscopy and may serve as a viable intervention with consideration of staged future periacetabular osteotomy (PAO). Importantly, this review does not suggest that hip arthroscopy alters the natural history of dysplasia; therefore, patients with dysplasia should be counseled on the potential utility of PAO by appropriate hip preservation specialists.

Postoperative hip bracing reduces kinesiophobia in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: a randomized-controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Detailed postoperative rehabilitation protocols after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are still a matter of debate. Adjunctive hip bracing represents a promising tool to improve early patients' mobilization. To present, the effect of hip brace therapy on postoperative functional outcomes and specific patient individual psychologic factors remains controversially discussed. Consequently, we aimed to report postoperative outcomes focusing on hip function, pain and kinesiophobia between braced and unbraced patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized-controlled trial was conducted, including patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS. After exclusion, a final study cohort of 36 patients in the intervention group (postoperative hip brace) and 36 patients in the control group (no hip brace) were compared for kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), pain (Visual analog scale) and joint function (International Hip Outcome Tool-12) within the first six postoperative months.

RESULTS

Hip arthroscopy significantly improved all patient-reported outcomes in both groups. Intergroup analysis revealed significantly lower levels of kinesiophobia in braced patients at 6-months follow up (30.7 vs. 34.1, p = 0.04) while not negatively affecting pain and joint function. No intra- and postoperative complications occurred within both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study could demonstrate that bracing after hip arthroscopy can positively influence kinesiophobia, while the brace did not negatively impact postoperative pain and quality of life. Thus, hip bracing could be a viable assistive therapy in the postoperative rehabilitation phase after hip arthroscopy.

Subpectineal obturator nerve block reduces opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy: a triple-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopy causes severe pain during the first few hours in the postoperative care unit. This is probably due to the intraoperative stretching of the hip joint capsule. Pain relief requires high doses of opioids which may prolong recovery and may cause opioid-related adverse events.The majority of hip joint capsule nociceptors are located anteriorly. The obturator nerve innervates the anteromedial part of the hip joint capsule. We hypothesized that a subpectineal obturator nerve block using 15 ml bupivacaine 5 mg/mL with added epinephrine 5 μg/mL would reduce the opioid consumption after hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

40 ambulatory hip arthroscopy patients were enrolled in this randomized, triple-blind controlled trial. All patients were allocated to a preoperative active or placebo subpectineal obturator nerve block. The primary outcome was opioid consumption for the first 3 hours in the postanesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes were pain, nausea, and hip adductor strength.

RESULTS

34 patients were analyzed for the primary outcome. The mean intravenous morphine equivalent consumption in the subpectineal obturator nerve block group was 11.9 mg vs 19.7 mg in the placebo group (p<0.001). The hip adductor strength was significantly reduced in the active group. No other intergroup differences were observed regarding the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant reduction in the opioid consumption for patients receiving an active subpectineal obturator nerve block. The postoperative intravenous morphine equivalent reduction the first painful 3 hours was reduced by 40% for patients receiving a subpectineal obturator nerve block in this randomized, triple-blind trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

EudraCT database 2021-006575-42.

Outcomes of Flexibility Sport Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopy has proved successful in treating femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with and without borderline hip dysplasia (BHD). Despite a high prevalence of BHD in patients who participate in sports with high flexibility requirements, a paucity of literature evaluates the efficacy of hip arthroscopy in treating FAIS in flexibility sport athletes with BHD.

PURPOSE

To compare minimum 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and achievement of clinically significant outcomes in flexibility sport athletes with BHD undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with capsular plication with results in flexibility sport athletes without dysplasia.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected for patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS with BHD, defined as a lateral center-edge angle of 18° to 25°, who reported participation in a sport with a high flexibility requirement, including dance, gymnastics, figure skating, yoga, cheerleading, and martial arts, according to previous literature. These patients were matched 1:2 to flexibility sport athletes without dysplasia, controlling for age, sex, and body mass index. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PROs were collected and compared between groups. Cohort-specific minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state achievement was compared between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 52 flexibility sport athletes with BHD were matched to 104 flexibility sport athletes without BHD. Both groups showed similar sport participation (P = .874) and a similar level of competition (P = .877). Preoperative lateral center-edge angle (22.2°± 1.6° vs 31.5°± 3.9°; P < .001) and Tönnis angle (10.9°± 3.7° vs 5.8°± 4.4°; P < .001) differed between groups. Capsular plication was performed in all cases. Both groups achieved significant improvement in all PROs (P < .001) with no differences in postoperative PROs between groups (P≥ .147). High minimal clinically important difference (BHD group: 95.7%; control group: 94.8%) and patient acceptable symptom state (BHD group: 71.7%; control group: 72.2%) achievement for any PRO was observed with no differences between groups (P≥ .835).

CONCLUSION

Flexibility sport athletes with BHD achieved similar outcomes as those of flexibility sport athletes without BHD after hip arthroscopy for FAIS with capsular plication.

Association Between Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy for Symptomatic Labral Tears: Minimum 8-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and symptomatic labral tears confers short- to midterm benefits, yet further long-term evidence is needed. Moreover, despite the physiological and biomechanical significance of the chondrolabral junction (CLJ), the clinical implications of damage to this transition zone remain understudied.

PURPOSE

To (1) report minimum 8-year survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures after hip arthroscopy for FAI and (2) characterize associations between outcomes and patient characteristics (age, body mass index, sex), pathological parameters (Tönnis angle, alpha angle, type of FAI, CLJ breakdown), and procedures performed (labral management, FAI treatment, microfracture).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for symptomatic labral tears secondary to FAI by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2013. All patients were ≥18 years of age with minimum 8-year follow-up and available preoperative radiographs. The primary outcome was conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA), and secondary outcomes included revision arthroscopy, patient-reported outcome measures, and patient satisfaction. CLJ breakdown was assessed using the Beck classification. Kaplan-Meier estimates and weighted Cox regression were used to estimate 10-year survivorship (no conversion to THA) and identify risk factors associated with THA conversion.

RESULTS

In this study of 174 hips (50.6% female; mean age, 37.8 ± 11.2 years) with mean follow-up of 11.1 ± 2.5 years, the 10-year survivorship rate was 81.6% (95% CI, 75.9%-87.7%). Conversion to THA occurred at a mean 4.7 ± 3.8 years postoperatively. Unadjusted analyses revealed several variables significantly associated with THA conversion, including older age; higher body mass index; higher Tönnis grade; labral debridement; and advanced breakdown of the CLJ, labrum, or articular cartilage. Survivorship at 10 years was inferior in patients exhibiting severe (43.6%; 95% CI, 31.9%-59.7%) versus mild (97.9%; 95% CI, 95.1%-100%) breakdown of the CLJ (P < .001). Multivariable analysis identified worsening CLJ breakdown (weighted hazard ratio per 1-unit increase, 6.41; 95% CI, 3.11-13.24), older age (1.09; 95% CI, 1.04-1.14), and higher Tönnis grade (4.59; 95% CI, 2.13-9.90) as independent negative prognosticators (P < .001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Although most patients achieved favorable minimum 8-year outcomes, several pre- and intraoperative factors were associated with THA conversion; of these, worse CLJ breakdown, higher Tönnis grade, and older age were the strongest predictors.

Satisfactory Clinical Outcomes and Continuance of Sports After Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair in Young Competitive Athletes at Minimum 8.5-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes and achievement rates of patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in young athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy, and to report long-term sports continuance and reoperation.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria consisted of age <24 years at surgery, femoroacetabular impingement undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair, and participation in sport with intent to return to sport after surgery. The enrollment period was from April 2009 to June 2014. Modified Harris Hip Scores (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), HOS Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), and HOS Sport (HOS-Sport) were collected preoperatively, 2 years' postoperatively, and final follow-up. Patients were evaluated for PASS achievement, reoperation, and sports participation.

RESULTS

Forty-two hips in 37 patients (11 male, 26 female, age: 17.7 ± 2.1 years, range 13.6-23.0, body mass index 22.8 ± 2.9, range 17.6-33.7) met inclusion criteria and were followed for 10.0 ± 1.3 years (range 8.5-13.0) postoperatively. Mean mHHS, HOS-ADL and HOS-Sports outcome scores at minimum 8.5 years were 82.2 ± 12.9, 89.6 ± 10.9, and 81.8 ± 16.4, respectively, with significant (P < .001) postoperative improvements. Thirty survey respondents (83%) met PASS for mHHS, 27 (75%) for HOS-ADL, and 24 (67%) for HOS-Sports. At minimum 8.5-year follow-up, only 9 of 37 (24%) cited their hip as the reason for stopping sport. Of the remaining patients, 17 of 28 (61%), continued playing their initial sport. There was no difference in patient-reported outcomes between patients who endorsed sports continuance and patients who did not report sports continuance and did not cite their hip as a reason (P ≥ .229). At final follow-up, 4 hips (10%) had undergone subsequent surgical intervention at a mean of 4.8 ± 3.3 years (range 1.0-8.4) postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Durable mid-term outcomes and satisfactory PASS achievement rates are observed in young amateur athletes undergoing primary hip arthroscopy. At minimum 8.5-year follow up, approximately 1 in 4 patients discontinue their sports due to hip related reasons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case-series.

Long-term Outcomes of Primary Hip Arthroscopy: Multicenter Analysis at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up With Attention to Labral and Capsular Management

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroscopy is rapidly advancing, with positive published outcomes at short- and midterm follow-up; however, available long-term data remain limited.

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy at a minimum 10-year follow-up at 2 academic centers by describing patient-reported outcomes and determining reoperation and total hip arthroplasty (THA) rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients with primary hip arthroscopy performed between January 1988 and April 2013 at 2 academic centers were evaluated for postoperative patient-reported outcomes-including the visual analog scale, Tegner Activity Scale score, Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living and Sport Specific subscales, modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool, surgery satisfaction, and reoperations.

RESULTS

A total of 294 patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy (age, 40 ± 14 years; 66% women; body mass index, 27 ± 6) were followed for 12 ± 3 years (range, 10-24 years) postoperatively. Labral debridement and repair were performed in 41% and 59% of patients, respectively. Of all patients who underwent interportal capsulotomy, 2% were extended to a T-capsulotomy, and 11% underwent capsular repair. At final follow-up, patients reported a mean visual analog scale at rest of 2 ± 2 and with use of 3 ± 3, a 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool of 68 ± 27, a Nonarthritic Hip Score of 81 ± 18, a modified Harris Hip Score of 79 ± 17, and a Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living of 82 ± 19 and Sport Specific subscale of 74 ± 25. The mean surgical satisfaction was 8.4 ± 2.4 on a 10-point scale, with 10 representing the highest level of satisfaction. In total, 96 hips (33%) underwent reoperation-including 65 hips (22%) converting to THA. THA risk factors included older age, higher body mass index, lower lateral center-edge angle, larger alpha angle, higher preoperative Tönnis grade, as well as labral debridement and capsular nonrepair (P≤ .039). Patients undergoing combined labral and capsular repair demonstrated a THA conversion rate of 3% compared with 31% for patients undergoing combined labral debridement and capsular nonrepair (P = .006). Labral repair trended toward increased 10-year THA-free survival (84% vs 77%; P = .085), while capsular repair demonstrated significantly increased 10-year THA-free survival (97% vs 79%; P = .033).

CONCLUSION

At a minimum 10-year follow-up, patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy demonstrated high satisfaction and acceptable outcome scores. In total, 33% of patients underwent reoperation-including 22% who underwent THA. Conversion to THA was associated with patient factors including older age, higher Tönnis grade, and potentially modifiable surgical factors such as labral debridement and capsular nonrepair.

Acetabular Labral Reconstruction Does Not Demonstrate Superior Biomechanical Properties Compared to Labral Repair or Intact Native Labrum but Is Superior to Labral Excision: A Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies

PURPOSE

To systematically review and compare biomechanical properties of labral reconstruction to labral repair, intact native labrum, and labral excision in cadaveric studies.

METHODS

A search of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and checklist. Cadaveric studies focused on hip biomechanics related to intact labrum, labral repair, labral reconstruction, labral augmentation, and labral excision were included. Investigated parameters included biomechanical data measures, such as distraction force, distance to suction seal rupture, peak negative pressure, contact area, and fluid efflux. Review articles, duplicates, technique reports, case reports, opinion articles, articles written in a language other than English, clinical studies focusing on patient-reported outcomes, studies performed in animals, and articles with no abstract available were also excluded.

RESULTS

Fourteen cadaveric biomechanical studies were included that compared labral reconstruction to labral repair (4 studies), labral reconstruction to labral excision (4 studies); and evaluation of distractive force of the labrum (3 studies), the distance to suction seal rupture (3 studies), fluid dynamics (2 studies), displacement at peak force (1 study), and stability ratio (1 study). Data pooling was not performed because of methodological heterogenicity of the studies. Labral reconstruction did not outperform labral repair in restoring the hip suction seal or any other biomechanical property. Labral repair significantly prevented greater fluid efflux when compared to labral reconstruction. Labral repair and reconstruction improved the distractive stability of the hip fluid seal from the labral tear and labral excision stage, respectively. Furthermore, labral reconstruction demonstrated to have better biomechanical properties than labral excision.

CONCLUSIONS

In cadaveric studies, labral repair or intact native labrum was biomechanically more superior than labral reconstruction; however, labral reconstruction can restore acetabular labral biomechanical properties and was biomechanically superior to labral excision.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In cadaveric models, labral repair outperforms segmental labral reconstruction in preserving the hip suction seal; nonetheless, segmental labral reconstruction biomechanically outperforms labral excision at time 0.

Defining Thresholds and Predictors for Achieving the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Revision Hip Arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

The Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) after primary hip arthroscopy has been determined; nonetheless, the PASS still needs to be defined for revision hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE

To define minimum 2-year follow-up PASS thresholds for the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) after revision hip arthroscopy, and to identify predictors of achieving the PASS.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy between April 2017 and July 2020. Patients were included if they had baseline and minimum 2-year follow-up scores for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS for pain, and iHOT-12. PASS was calculated using the anchor-based method. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the thresholds for the PASS. A multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for achieving the PASS.

RESULTS

A total of 318 patients who underwent revision hip arthroscopy met the inclusion criteria. Of those patients, 292 (91.8%) had baseline and minimum 2-year follow-up. Of this group, 68 patients (72.1% female and 27.9% male; mean age, 32.9 years) answered the PASS anchor question. Achievement PASS rates were 58.8%, 41.2%, 52.9%, 60.3%, and 52.9% for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS, and iHOT-12, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) values for the PASS for mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS, and iHOT-12 were 0.912, 0.888, 0.857, 0.903, and 0.871, respectively, indicating excellent discrimination. The PASS for the mHHS was 76 (sensitivity, 0.809; specificity, 0.905), for the NAHS was 86.3 (sensitivity, 0.660; specificity, 1), for the HOS-SSS was 64.3 (sensitivity, 0.745; specificity, 0.905), for the VAS was 3 (sensitivity, 0.830; specificity, 0.905), and for the iHOT-12 was 64.3 (sensitivity, 0.745; specificity, 0.905). Body mass index (BMI) was identified as a significant predictor of achieving PASS for the NAHS (OR, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.940-0.996; P = .027), as patients with a BMI ≤25.4 had 1.03 times higher odds ratio of achieving PASS for the NAHS.

CONCLUSION

After revision hip arthroscopy, the minimum 2-year follow-up PASS thresholds for the mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, VAS for pain, and iHOT-12 were 76, 86.3, 64.3, 3, and 64.3, respectively. The odds ratio of achieving PASS for the NAHS was 1.03 times higher for patients with a BMI ≤25.4.

Team Approach: Hip Preservation Surgery

The evaluation and treatment of adolescents and young adults with hip pain has seen tremendous growth over the past 20 years. Labral tears are well established as a common cause of hip pain but often occur because of underlying bony abnormalities. Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and acetabular dysplasia are now well-established causes of hip osteoarthritis and are increasingly treated in the prearthritic stage in hopes of improving symptoms and prolonging the longevity of the native hip. Beyond FAI and acetabular dysplasia, this patient population can present with a complex and variable group of underlying conditions that need to be taken into account. Expertise in the conservative management of this population, including physical therapy, is valuable to maximize the success. Preoperative, surgical, and postoperative decision-making and care in this population is complex and evolving. A comprehensive, multidisciplinary approach to the care of this patient population has been used for over 20 years by our institution with great success. The purpose of this article is to review the "team-based approach" necessary for successful management of the spectrum of adolescent and young adult hip disorders.

Long-Term Outcomes of Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Repair for Femoroacetabular Impingement: Results at Minimum 9-Year Follow-up

Background

Hip arthroscopy continues to advance and become increasingly commonly performed. With the evolution of techniques and instrumentation, labral repair rather than debridement has emerged as the treatment of choice for labral pathology. There remains a lack of data on long-term outcomes after labral repair.

Purpose

To (1) evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes of primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for femoroacetabular impingement, (2) report achievement rates of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and (3) investigate rates of reoperation and progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

Prospectively collected data were reviewed for patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair between 2010 and 2013. Patients' medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, intraoperative findings, reoperation, and progression to THA. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively using the following scales: visual analog scale (VAS) for pain; Tegner activity scale; modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS); 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12); Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL); HOS-Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS); and Non-Arthritic Hip Score. Patients were also surveyed for satisfaction, subjective improvement, and level of function.

Results

A total of 32 patients (n = 24 women; n = 8 men) with a mean age of 27.7 years (range, 13.6-51 years) were evaluated for a mean of 9.4 years (range, 9-12.1 years). Patients achieved significant mean improvements in VAS pain at rest of 2 points, VAS pain with use of 1.9, mHHS of 19.9 points, iHOT-12 of 33.5 points, HOS-ADL of 17.4 points, and HOS-SSS of 29.5 points (P≤ .015 for all). Eleven patients (34.4%) underwent reoperation and 4 (12.5%) progressed to THA during the study period. At the final follow-up, the MCID achievement rate was ≥68%, the PASS achievement rates ranged from 39% to 65%, and the mean patient satisfaction was 8.1 on a 1 to 10 scale, with 10 denoting most satisfied.

Conclusion

Patients demonstrated significant postoperative improvements in pain, mHHS, iHOT-12, HOS-ADL, and HOS-SSS scores at 9 years postoperatively. The all-cause reoperation rate was 34.4%, and 12.5% of patients progressed to THA.

Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated With Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain: A Revision

The Academy of Orthopaedic Physical Therapy (AOPT), formerly the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA), has an ongoing effort to create evidence-based practice guidelines for orthopaedic physical therapy management of patients with musculoskeletal impairments described in the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). This is an update to the 2014 Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for Hip Pain and Movement Dysfunction Associated with Nonarthritic Hip Joint Pain. The goals of the revision were to provide a concise summary of the contemporary evidence since publication of the original guideline and to develop new recommendations or revise previously published recommendations to support evidence-based practice. This current CPG covers pathoanatomical features, clinical course, prognosis, diagnosis, examination, and physical therapy interventions in the management of nonarthritic hip joint pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(7):CPG1-CPG70. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.0302.