1
|
Marino R, Ratti F, Casadei-Gardini A, Rimini M, Pedica F, Clocchiatti L, Aldrighetti L. The oncologic burden of residual disease in incidental gallbladder cancer: An elastic net regression model to profile high-risk features. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108397. [PMID: 38815335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Incidental Gallbladder Cancer (IGBC) following cholecystectomy constitutes a significant portion of gallbladder cancer diagnoses. Re-exploration is advocated to optimize disease clearance and enhance survival rates. The consistent association of residual disease (RD) with inferior oncologic outcomes prompts a critical examination of re-resection's role as a modifying factor in the natural history of IGBC. METHODS All patients diagnosed with gallbladder cancer between 2012 and 2022 were included. An elastic net regularized regression model was employed to profile high-risk predictors of RD within the IGBC group. Survival outcomes were assessed based on resection margins and RD. RESULTS Among the 181 patients undergoing re-exploration for IGBC, 133 (73.5 %) harbored RD, while 48 (26.5 %) showed no evidence. The elastic net model, utilizing a selected λ = 0.029, identified six coefficients associated with the risk of RD: aspiration from cholecystectomy (0.141), hepatic tumor origin (1.852), time to re-exploration >8 weeks (1.879), positive margin status (2.575), higher T stage (1.473), and poorly differentiated tumors (2.241). Furthermore, the study revealed a median overall survival of 44 months (CI 38-60) for IGBC patients with no evidence of RD, compared to 31 months (23-42) for those with RD (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Re-resection revealed a high incidence of RD (73.5 %), significantly correlating with poorer survival outcomes. The preoperative identification of high-risk features provides a reliable biological disease profile. This aids in strategic preselection of patients who may benefit from re-resection, underscoring the need to consolidate outcomes with tailored chemotherapy for those with unfavorable characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Marino
- IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, 20132, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Margherita Rimini
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Pedica
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Pathology Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Clocchiatti
- IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, 20132, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, 20132, Milan, Italy; University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
He ZQ, Mao YL, Lv TR, Liu F, Li FY. A meta-analysis between robotic hepatectomy and conventional open hepatectomy. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:166. [PMID: 38587718 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01882-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Current meta-analysis was performed to compare robotic hepatectomy (RH) with conventional open hepatectomy (OH) in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were all searched up for comparative studies between RH and OH. RevMan5.3 software and Stata 13.0 software were used for statistical analysis. Nineteen studies with 1747 patients who received RH and 23,633 patients who received OH were included. Pooled results indicated that patients who received RH were generally younger than those received OH (P < 0.00001). Moreover, RH was associated with longer operative time (P = 0.0002), less intraoperative hemorrhage (P < 0.0001), lower incidence of intraoperative transfusion (P = 0.003), lower incidence of postoperative any morbidity (P < 0.00001), postoperative major morbidity (P = 0.0001), mortalities with 90 days after surgery (P < 0.0001), and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.00001). Comparable total hospital costs were acquired between RH and OH groups (P = 0.46). However, even at the premise of comparable R0 rate (P = 0.86), RH was associated with smaller resected tumor size (P < 0.00001). Major hepatectomy (P = 0.02) and right posterior hepatectomy (P = 0.0003) were less frequently performed in RH group. Finally, we concluded that RH was superior to OH in terms of peri-operative and postoperative outcomes. RH could lead to less intraoperative hemorrhage, less postoperative complications and an enhanced postoperative recovery. However, major hepatectomy and right posterior hepatectomy were still less frequently performed via robotic approach. Future more powerful well-designed studies are required for further exploration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Qiang He
- Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Ya-Ling Mao
- Day Surgery Center, General Practice Medical Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Tian-Run Lv
- Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Fu-Yu Li
- Department of Biliary Tract Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pavlidis ET, Galanis IN, Pavlidis TE. New trends in diagnosis and management of gallbladder carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:13-29. [PMID: PMID: 38292841 PMCID: PMC10824116 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i1.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder (GB) carcinoma, although relatively rare, is the most common biliary tree cholangiocarcinoma with aggressiveness and poor prognosis. It is closely associated with cholelithiasis and long-standing large (> 3 cm) gallstones in up to 90% of cases. The other main predisposing factors for GB carcinoma include molecular factors such as mutated genes, GB wall calcification (porcelain) or mainly mucosal microcalcifications, and GB polyps ≥ 1 cm in size. Diagnosis is made by ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and, more precisely, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Preoperative staging is of great importance in decision-making regarding therapeutic management. Preoperative staging is based on MRI findings, the leading technique for liver metastasis imaging, enhanced three-phase CT angiography, or magnetic resonance angiography for major vessel assessment. It is also necessary to use positron emission tomography (PET)-CT or 18F-FDG PET-MRI to more accurately detect metastases and any other occult deposits with active metabolic uptake. Staging laparoscopy may detect dissemination not otherwise found in 20%-28.6% of cases. Multimodality treatment is needed, including surgical resection, targeted therapy by biological agents according to molecular testing gene mapping, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy. It is of great importance to understand the updated guidelines and current treatment options. The extent of surgical intervention depends on the disease stage, ranging from simple cholecystectomy (T1a) to extended resections and including extended cholecystectomy (T1b), with wide lymph node resection in every case or IV-V segmentectomy (T2), hepatic trisegmentectomy or major hepatectomy accompanied by hepaticojejunostomy Roux-Y, and adjacent organ resection if necessary (T3). Laparoscopic or robotic surgery shows fewer postoperative complications and equivalent oncological outcomes when compared to open surgery, but much attention must be paid to avoiding injuries. In addition to surgery, novel targeted treatment along with immunotherapy and recent improvements in radiotherapy and chemotherapy (neoadjuvant-adjuvant capecitabine, cisplatin, gemcitabine) have yielded promising results even in inoperable cases calling for palliation (T4). Thus, individualized treatment must be applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Efstathios T Pavlidis
- 2nd Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Ioannis N Galanis
- 2nd Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| | - Theodoros E Pavlidis
- 2nd Propedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippokration General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54642, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wu X, Li B, Zheng C, Liu W, Hong T, He X. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gallbladder carcinoma: safety, feasibility, and oncological outcomes. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3437-3446. [PMID: 37118262 PMCID: PMC10602986 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03207-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder carcinoma (GC) is a rare malignant tumor. Laparoscopic technology has revolutionized the reality of surgery. However, whether laparoscopic surgery is suitable for GC has not been clarified. We aimed to analyze the safety, feasibility, and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in GC. METHODS The medical records of patients with GC treated at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent laparoscopic and open surgery were compared. Propensity score matched analysis was performed to balance the basic characteristics of the two groups. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to describe and compare the overall and disease-free survival rates between the groups. RESULTS A total of 163 patients with GC were included. Cholelithiasis was detected in 64 (39.3%) patients. Seventy patients were matched after propensity score matching. The laparoscopic group was significantly better than the open group in terms of operation time (p < 0.001), blood loss (p = 0.002), drain time (p = 0.001), and hospital stay (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up time of 19 (12, 35) months, there was no significant difference in the cumulative overall (p = 0.650) and disease-free (p = 0.663) survival rates between the laparoscopic and open groups according to Kaplan-Meier curves. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery can reduce the operation time and blood loss, and shorten drain time and hospital stay without increasing the incidence of complications. Patients undergoing laparoscopic and open surgery have a similar prognosis. Laparoscopic surgery is worth promoting in patients with GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Binglu Li
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Chaoji Zheng
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Tao Hong
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaodong He
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
He S, Yu TN, Cao JS, Zhou XY, Chen ZH, Jiang WB, Cai LX, Liang X. Laparoscopic vs open radical resection in management of gallbladder carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:6455-6475. [PMID: 37900219 PMCID: PMC10601008 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i27.6455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical resection offers the only hope for the long-term survival of patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) above the T1b stage. However, whether it should be performed under laparoscopy for GBC is still controversial. AIM To compare laparoscopic radical resection (LRR) with traditional open radical resection (ORR) in managing GBC. METHODS A comprehensive search of online databases, including Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, was conducted to identify comparative studies involving LRR and ORR in GBCs till March 2023. A meta-analysis was subsequently performed. RESULTS A total of 18 retrospective studies were identified. In the long-term prognosis, the LRR group was comparable with the ORR group in terms of overall survival and tumor-free survival (TFS). LRR showed superiority in terms of TFS in the T2/tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) Ⅱ stage subgroup vs the ORR group (P = 0.04). In the short-term prognosis, the LRR group had superiority over the ORR group in the postoperative length of stay (POLS) (P < 0.001). The sensitivity analysis showed that all pooled results were robust. CONCLUSION The meta-analysis results show that LRR is not inferior to ORR in all measured outcomes and is even superior in the TFS of patients with stage T2/TNM Ⅱ disease and POLS. Surgeons with sufficient laparoscopic experience can perform LRR as an alternative surgical strategy to ORR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilin He
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Tu-Nan Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jia-Sheng Cao
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xue-Yin Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
- School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325035, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Zhe-Han Chen
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang Province, China
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fuyang First People’s Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Wen-Bin Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Liu-Xin Cai
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fontana AP, Russolillo N, Di Menno Stavron J, Langella S, Tesoriere RL, Ricotti A, Ferrero A. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b-5 bi-segmentectomy in patients with gallbladder cancer. Updates Surg 2023; 75:1471-1480. [PMID: 37495871 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01599-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Sg4b-5 anatomical bi-segmentectomy with regional lymphadenectomy (Sg4b5) is a surgical option for gallbladder cancer (GBC) treatment. The laparoscopic approach to this challenging operation is still controversial. Aim of this study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open Sg4b5 in a single institution series of patients. All consecutive patients who underwent Sg4b5 for GBC from January 2000 to September 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed. 75 patients were analyzed, 18 in the laparoscopic and 57 in the open group. After IPTW, laparoscopic approach was associated with a significantly decreased median intraoperative blood loss (100 vs 237.09 ml, p = 0.001), shorter median length of hospital stay (4 vs 8 days, p = < 0.001) and a higher median number of harvested nodes (9 vs 7, p = 0.026). Operation time was shorter in the open group (355 vs 259 min, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found regarding clear resection margins, overall and major (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) morbidity, bile leakage rate, 90 days post-operative mortality, overall and disease-free survival. Laparoscopic Sg4b-5 anatomical bi-segmentectomy and regional lymphadenectomy is feasible and safe with long term outcome comparable to open approach at least in early stages. Laparoscopic approach confirms its well-known short-term benefits with less intraoperative bleeding and shorter length of stay. Moreover, it might allow a better lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea P Fontana
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy.
| | - Nadia Russolillo
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Juliana Di Menno Stavron
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Serena Langella
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Roberto Lo Tesoriere
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrea Ricotti
- Clinical Trial Unit, Medical Direction of Hospital, Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Mauriziano Hospital, Largo Turati 62, 10128, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Minagawa T, Itano O, Hasegawa S, Wada H, Abe Y, Kitago M, Katsura Y, Takeda Y, Adachi T, Eguchi S, Oshima G, Aiko S, Ome Y, Kobayashi T, Hashida K, Nara S, Esaki M, Watanabe J, Ohtani H, Endo Y, Shirobe T, Tokumitsu Y, Nagano H. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic radical gallbladder resection for gallbladder carcinoma: A multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:1046-1054. [PMID: 37306108 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Laparoscopic resection of gallbladder carcinomas remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic procedures for suspected gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). METHODS In this retrospective study, data regarding suspected GBC treated with laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy before 2020 in Japan, was included. Patient characteristics, surgical procedure details, surgical outcomes, and long-term outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Data of 129 patients with suspected GBC who underwent laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy were retrospectively collected from 11 institutions in Japan. Among them, 82 patients with pathological GBC were included in the study. Laparoscopic gallbladder bed resection was performed in 114 patients and laparoscopic resection of segments IVb and V was performed in 15 patients. The median operation time was 269 min (range: 83-725 min), and the median intraoperative blood loss was 30 mL (range: 0-950 mL). The conversion and postoperative complication rates were 8% and 2%, respectively. During the follow-up period, the 5-year overall survival rate was 79% and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 87%. Recurrence was detected in the liver, lymph nodes, and other local tissues. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy is a treatment option with potential favorable outcomes in selected patients with suspected GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Minagawa
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Osamu Itano
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Hasegawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Wada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuta Abe
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Kitago
- Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshiteru Katsura
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yutaka Takeda
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Susumu Eguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Go Oshima
- Department of Surgery, Eiju General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Aiko
- Department of Surgery, Eiju General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Ome
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiki Kobayashi
- Department of Surgery, Shizuoka City Shizuoka Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kazuki Hashida
- Department of Surgery, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Kurashiki, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nara
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Minoru Esaki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jota Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hiromi Ohtani
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, Tamakyuryu Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Shirobe
- Department of Surgery, Hamamatsu-Minami Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yukio Tokumitsu
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nagano
- Department of Gastroenterological, Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sun J, Xie TG, Ma ZY, Wu X, Li BL. Current status and progress in laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:2369-2379. [PMID: 37179580 PMCID: PMC10167897 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i16.2369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is the most common biliary tract malignancy associated with a concealed onset, high invasiveness and poor prognosis. Radical surgery remains the only curative treatment for GBC, and the optimal extent of surgery depends on the tumor stage. Radical resection can be achieved by simple cholecystectomy for Tis and T1a GBC. However, whether simple cholecystectomy or extended cholecystectomy, including regional lymph node dissection and hepatectomy, is the standard surgical extent for T1b GBC remains controversial. Extended cholecystectomy should be performed for T2 and some T3 GBC without distant metastasis. Secondary radical surgery is essential for incidental gall-bladder cancer diagnosed after cholecystectomy. For locally advanced GBC, hepatopancreatoduodenectomy may achieve R0 resection and improve long-term survival outcomes, but the extremely high risk of the surgery limits its implementation. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. GBC was once regarded as a contraindication of laparoscopic surgery. However, with improvements in surgical instruments and skills, studies have shown that laparoscopic surgery will not result in a poorer prognosis for selected patients with GBC compared with open surgery. Moreover, laparoscopic surgery is associated with enhanced recovery after surgery since it is minimally invasive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia Sun
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Tian-Ge Xie
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Zu-Yi Ma
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Bing-Lu Li
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ahmed SH, Usmani SUR, Mushtaq R, Samad S, Abid M, Moeed A, Atif AR, Farhan SA, Saif A. Role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of gallbladder cancer: Systematic review & meta-analysis. Am J Surg 2023; 225:975-987. [PMID: 36693774 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and short-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic vs. open surgery for gallbladder carcinoma(GBC). METHODS Meta-analysis was performed on laparoscopic(LG) and open group(OG) studies. Data for survival outcomes were extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves and combined with Tierney's method to estimate hazard ratios(HRs) and 95% CIs. RESULTS There was no significant difference in overall survival(HR: 1.01), disease-free survival(HR: 0.84), 30-day mortality(RR:1.10), overall recurrence(RR:0.93), intraoperative gallbladder violation(RR:1.17), operative time(WMD:8.32), number of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy(RR:1.06) and blood transfusion(RR: 0.81). A significant difference was seen in survival of T3 subgroup(HR:0.77) and number of lymph node dissections (LND)(WMD: 0.63) favoring OG, along with a decrease in postoperative complications(RR:0.65), greater incidence of R0 resections(RR:1.04), lower volume of intraoperative blood loss(WMD: 128.62), lower time in removing drainage tube(WMD: 1.35), shorter diet recovery time(WMD: 1.88), shorter hospital stay(WMD: 3.51), lower incidence of 90-day mortality(RR:0.49) favoring LG. A higher incidence of port-site recurrence(RR:1.99) was reported in LG. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery is non-inferior to the open approach in terms of oncological outcomes and has an improved rate of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syeda Hoorulain Ahmed
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan.
| | - Shajie Ur Rehman Usmani
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Rabeea Mushtaq
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Saba Samad
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Minaam Abid
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Moeed
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Abdul Raafe Atif
- Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Baba-e-Urdu Rd, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan
| | - Syed Ali Farhan
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health, 1200 E Marshall St, Richmond, VA, 23219, United States
| | - Areeba Saif
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 7000 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Huang L, Zhang C, Tian Y, Liao C, Yan M, Qiu F, Zhou S, Lai Z, Wang Y, Lin Y, Chen S. Laparoscopic segment 4b+5 liver resection for stage T3 gallbladder cancer. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8893-8907. [PMID: 35906460 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09325-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is still controversy over whether to perform laparoscopic surgery for T3 stage gallbladder cancer. In addition, the necessity of segment 4b+5 liver resection for stage T3 gallbladder has not been reported. This article aims to explore the safety, effectiveness, and short-term prognosis of laparoscopic segment 4b+5 liver resection for T3 stage gallbladder cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter propensity score-matched study. Disease-free survival, perioperative complications, and intraoperative safety were analyzed to evaluate safety and effectiveness. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative bleeding, number of lymph nodes obtained, postoperative complications, or disease-free survival (DFS) between the open group (OG) and laparoscopic group (LG) (P > 0.05). The DFS time of the S4b+5 resection group (S4b5) was longer than that of the wedge group (P = 0.016). Cox regression showed that positive margins (HR, 5.32; 95% CI 1.03-27.63; P = 0.047), lymph node metastasis (HR, 2.70; 95% CI 1.31-5.53; P = 0.007), and liver S4b+5 resection (HR, 0.30; 95% CI 0.14-0.66; P = 0.003) were independent risk factors for DFS. The operative time of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence-guided liver S4b5 segment resection was shorter than that of traditional laparoscopic S4b+5 resection guided by hepatic veins (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic liver S4b+5 resection for T3 stage gallbladder cancer is safe and feasible and can prolong DFS. ICG fluorescence-guided negative staining may reduce the difficulty of the operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Long Huang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Chenjun Zhang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Yifeng Tian
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Chengyu Liao
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Maolin Yan
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Funan Qiu
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Songqiang Zhou
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Zhide Lai
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Yaodong Wang
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China
| | - Ye Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 106 Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
| | - Shi Chen
- Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China. .,Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No. 134 East Street, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
| |
Collapse
|