Comparison of the effectiveness and safety between endoscopic-assisted lateral neck dissection and conventional open lateral neck dissection:A meta-analysis

Implications of five endoscopic and conventional open surgery on lateral neck dissection outcomes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a network meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy and safety of different surgical approaches to thyroidectomy with lateral neck dissection remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate five endoscopic and open techniques for thyroidectomy with lateral neck dissection and identify the most effective method.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing different surgical approaches across multiple outcome indicators. The risk of bias was analyzed, and publication bias was assessed using funnel plot asymmetry tests. Both global and local inconsistency tests were performed to evaluate the agreement between direct and indirect comparisons. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted for each outcome, with approaches ranked using Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) values and curves.

RESULTS

A total of 1251 patients across 13 clinical studies were included in the analysis. No significant statistical differences were found among the approaches for lymph node dissection and postoperative recurrence rates. The bilateral axillary breast approach yielded the highest number of lymph nodes (SUCRA value: 0.762). The suprasternal fossa approach had the lowest postoperative recurrence rate (SUCRA: 0.657) and performed well in metastatic lymph node dissection (SUCRA: 0.679). The bilateral axillary breast approach significantly reduced postoperative complication rates compared to the open and transaxillary approaches (mean differences: - 1.88 and - 0.23; 95% confidence intervals: - 3.87 to - 0.46 and - 0.62 to 0.29, respectively) and was the most effective in minimizing complications (SUCRA: 0.910). Open surgery demonstrated a significantly shorter operative duration.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic approaches are viable and safe alternatives to open surgery, with fewer postoperative complications, albeit at the cost of longer operative durations.

Feasibility of remote-access and minimally invasive video-assisted approaches in lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and surgical outcomes of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and three remote-access approaches, namely the robotic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA-R), endoscopic breast-chest approach (BCA-E), and robotic gasless transaxillary approach (GTAA-R) in lateral neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma, compared with conventional transcervical approach (CTA).

METHODS

The literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases, covering the period January 2000 to February 2024. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were performed to compare surgical feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes between approaches.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles on lateral neck dissection in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma were included after systematic screening. The number of removed and metastatic lateral lymph nodes, the extent of lateral neck dissection, the rate of transient recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and hypoparathyroidism, serum-stimulated thyroglobulin levels, and recurrence were not significantly different between the MIVAT and three remote-access approaches. Additionally, these were comparable to those of the CTA. However, the MIVAT and remote-access approaches took a longer operative time but provided superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the CTA.

CONCLUSION

Lateral neck dissection using the MIVAT and three remote-access approaches was feasible and comparable to CTA in the number of lymph nodes removed, complications, stimulated thyroglobulin level, and recurrence. The MIVAT and remote-access approaches lasted longer but provided significantly superior cosmetic outcomes compared to the CTA.

A scoping review of endoscopic and robotic techniques for lateral neck dissection in thyroid cancer

Introduction

Lateral neck dissection (LND) in thyroid cancer has traditionally been performed by a transcervical technique with a large collar incision. With the rise of endoscopic, video-assisted, and robotic techniques for thyroidectomy, minimally invasive LND is now being performed more frequently, with better cosmetic outcomes.

Methods

The purpose of this paper is to review the different minimally invasive and remote access techniques for LND in thyroid cancer. A comprehensive literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar search terms "thyroid cancer" and "lateral neck dissection" and "endoscopy OR robot OR endoscopic OR video-assisted".

Results

There are multiple surgical options now available within each subset of endoscopic, video-assisted, and robotic LND. The approach dictates the extent of the LND but almost all techniques access levels II-IV, with variability on levels I and V. This review provides an overview of the indications, contraindications, surgical and oncologic outcomes for each technique.

Discussion

Though data remains limited, endoscopic and robotic techniques for LND are safe, with improved cosmetic results and comparable oncologic and surgical outcomes. Similar to patient selection in minimally invasive thyroidectomy, it is important to consider the extent of the LND and select appropriate surgical candidates.

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study of Minimally Invasive Video-assisted Thyroidectomy for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to observe the effectiveness of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) in treating papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).

METHODS

A total of 224 patients with PTMC who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected from the Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, between January 2017 and December 2019. They were randomized into the MIVAT group or traditional open operation group. For both groups, we observed the number of lymph node dissections, amount of intraoperative blood loss, duration of the operation, length of the incision, and number of injuries to the recurrent laryngeal nerve.

RESULTS

The average operation time (132.8±29.4 min) in the MIVAT group was significantly higher than that in the open surgery group (83.8±14.29 min) ( P =0.026). The length of incision (2.8±0.6 cm) in patients in the MIVAT group was significantly shorter than that in patients in the open group (7.4±1.1 cm) ( P =0.000). No significant differences were observed in the number of lymph node dissections ( P =0.712), the amount of intraoperative bleeding ( P =0.581), and the number of recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries ( P =0.634). The average follow-up was 5 years, and both groups had no recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of PTMC, MIVAT had similar outcomes as traditional open operations, although the operation time was longer. However, the length of the incision was significantly shorter and thus provided cosmetic advantages for patients.

Endoscope-assisted versus conventional neck dissection in patients with oral cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Neck dissection is an integral component of the treatment of head and neck cancers. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the use of endoscope-assisted neck dissection (END) with conventional neck dissection (CND) in the existing English literature.

Methods

A search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles reporting the results of the two techniques of neck dissection was completed independently by two individuals. The authors analyzed the data from each study using a random-effects model.

Results

The pooled analysis demonstrated comparable lymph node yield, intraoperative blood loss, incidence of locoregional recurrence, and incidence of complications between the two groups. A significantly longer operative time but a shorter length of hospital stay was observed in the END group compared with the other group.

Conclusions

Compared with conventional techniques, END offers similar oncologic outcomes and complication rates; however, it requires a longer operative time. Future studies with long-term follow-up and assessment of patient satisfaction are needed to confirm the clinical use of END.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40463-022-00567-9.