Smoothness of the knee joint movement during the stance phase in patients with severe knee osteoarthritis

A Preliminary Study on Kinetic Analysis of Ground Reaction Force and Impulse During Gait in Patients With Total Hip Replacement and Implication for Rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

There is little research done on ground reaction forces (GRF) in terms of 3D impulses after total hip replacement (THR). This study aimed to investigate the GRFs and 3D impulses in four sub-phases of stance during gait in the patients undergoing THR.

METHODS

A total of 10 pain-free THR patients and 10 healthy people were recruited. This is an observational and retrospective study. The gait data was collected between 2008 and 2014 and analyzed between 2020 and 2024. All the participants were included in the three-dimensional gait analysis. Gait parameters, phase durations, GRFs and impulses' key values during gait were calculated in four sub-phases of stance. Statistical comparisons were performed with generalized linear models including age, gender, body mass index and walking speed as interactive factors.

RESULTS

It is found that (1) cadence, walking speed, stride length and step width in THR group were significantly decreased in compared with control group; (2) the THR decreased loading response duration in operative side and pre-swing duration in non-operative side compared with the control group, but the THR's two sides have similar duration proportions in sub-stance phases; (3) the THR group had lower GRFs than the control group in vertical direction but higher in the medial-lateral direction; (4) in operative side, the THR's impulses in loading response phase were lower than the control group in anterior-posterior direction, and (5) in non-operative side, the THR's impulse in pre-swing phase in anterior-posterior direction was higher than the control side.

CONCLUSION

The THR group showed slower walking speeds than the control group. The reasons could be from the decreased impulse in loading response phase, the decreased 2nd peak of GRF and the decreased pre-swing impulse in vertical direction in operative side. Clinicians are suggested to consider the information provided when designing relevant rehabilitation exercises on the related muscles and functions.

Relationship between Tissue Gliding of the Lateral Thigh and Gait Parameters after Trochanteric Fractures

Trochanteric fractures lead to severe functional deficits and gait disorders compared to femoral neck fractures. This study aims to investigate gait parameters related to gliding between tissues (gliding) after trochanteric fracture (TF) surgery. This study implemented a cross-sectional design and was conducted amongst patients who underwent TF surgery (n = 94) approximately three weeks post-trochanteric fracture surgery. The following parameters were evaluated: (1) gliding between tissues; (2) lateral femoral pain during loading; (3) maximum gait speed; (4) stride time variability and step time asymmetry as measures of gait cycle variability; (5) double stance ratio and single stance ratio for assessment of stance phase, (6) jerk; and (7) Locomotor rehabilitation index as a measure of force changes during gait. The gliding coefficient was significantly correlated with lateral femoral pain (r = 0.517), jerk root mean square (r = −0.433), and initial contact-loading response jerk (r = −0.459). The jerk of the force change value during gait was also effective in understanding the characteristics of the gait in the initial contact-loading response in patients with trochanteric fractures. Additionally, gliding is related not only to impairments such as pain but also to disabilities such as those affecting gait.

Effects of prolonged load carriage on angular jerk of frontal and sagittal knee motion

BACKGROUND

During training, service members routinely walk with heavy body borne loads for long periods of time. These loads alter knee biomechanics and may produce jerky knee motions that reportedly increase joint loading and risk of musculoskeletal injury. Yet, it is unknown if service members use jerky knee motions during prolong walking with body borne load.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To quantify the effects of body borne load and duration of walking on the jerkiness of sagittal and frontal plane knee motion.

METHODS

Eighteen participants had angular jerk of knee motion quantified while they walked (1.3 m/s) for 60-min with three body borne loads (0, 15, and 30 kg). Peak and cost of angular jerk for sagittal and frontal plane knee motion was quantified and submitted to a repeated measures linear model to test the main effects and interaction of load (0, 15, and 30 kg) and time (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min).

RESULTS

Body borne load increased peak and cost of angular jerk for sagittal plane knee motion up to 35 % and 110 %, respectively, and frontal plane knee motion up to 20 % and 51 %, respectively (all p<0.001), while jerk cost of frontal plane knee motion (p=0.001) increased 31 % after walking 45 min.

SIGNIFICANCE

Body borne load produced large (between 20 % and 110 %), incremental increases in angular jerk for both sagittal and frontal plane knee motion; whereas, duration of walking led to a 31 % increase in jerkiness of frontal plane knee motion. Service members who often walking for long periods of time with heavy body borne loads may have greater risk of developing musculoskeletal injury and disease due to large increases in jerky knee motions.

Influence of Pain on Knee Joint Movement and Moment during the Stance Phase in Patients with Severe Bilateral Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study

Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare the side-to-side differences in knee joint movement and moment for the degree of pain in the walking stance phase in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis (KOA) of comparable severity. We hypothesized that knee joint movement and moment on the side with strong pain were lower compared with the side with weak pain. Materials and Methods: We included 11 patients diagnosed with bilateral severe KOA. In all patients’ left and right knees, the Kellgren–Lawrence radiographic scoring system grade was level 4, and the femorotibial angle and knee range of motion were equivalent. Following patients’ interviews with an orthopedic surgeon, we performed a comparative study with KOA with strong pain (KOAs) as the strong painful side and KOA with weak pain (KOAw) as the weak painful side. Data for changes in bilateral knee joint angles in three dimensions during the stance phase and bilateral knee sagittal and frontal moments exerted in the early and late stance phases were extracted from kinematics and kinetics analyses. Results: Three-dimensional joint movements in the knee joint were not significantly different in all phases between KOAs and KOAw. Knee extensor moment in the early stance phase in KOAs was significantly smaller than that in KOAw. Knee abductor moment in the early and late stance phase was not significantly different between KOAs and KOAw. Conclusions: Although we found no difference in joint motion in bilateral knee joints, knee extensor moment on the side with strong pain was decreased. In patients with bilateral severe KOA, it was suggested that the magnitude of knee pain contributed to the decrease in knee joint function.