Resident Involvement in Hip Arthroscopy Procedures Does Not Affect Short-Term Surgical Outcomes

Impact of a Recently Accredited Orthopedic Surgery Residency on Patient Outcome Scores in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures are a valuable tool to evaluate an intervention from a patient's perspective. Previous evidence shows that, while resident involvement may increase operative times, it does not affect complications or patient-reported outcomes. This study sought to assess the impact of a new residency program on patient-reported outcome measures, operative time, and complication rates in total shoulder arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty at a single health care system. Demographic data, resident presence during shoulder arthroplasty, arthroplasty type, procedure duration, complications, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score change were collected. Patients 18 years or older who underwent primary anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty were included. Patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, had a preoperative diagnosis other than primary osteoarthritis, lacked preoperative and postoperative ASES scores, and canceled procedures were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were identified and included in our analysis. Ninety-seven total shoulder arthroplasties were performed with a resident not present, and 42 with a resident present. This study showed no significant effects of the presence or absence of a resident on ASES scores, complication rates, or surgery times.

CONCLUSION

This study adds to previous evidence indicating that attending orthopedic surgeons can support resident learning and surgical skill development while maintaining patient-reported outcome measures, surgical time, and complication rates similar to those without resident involvement when performing shoulder arthroplasty. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(2):104-110.].

Impact of Resident Involvement on 30-Day Postoperative Outcomes in Orthopedic Shoulder Surgery

The literature concerning resident involvement in shoulder surgery is limited. The purpose of this study was to examine whether resident involvement across all orthopedic shoulder surgeries is associated with adverse 30-day outcomes. Utilizing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, patients who underwent shoulder surgery with or without a resident present were analyzed. Independent t-test and chi-square or Fischer's exact test were used appropriately. A logistic regression model was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios. This study examined 5,648 patients: 3,455 patients in the "Attending alone" group and 2,193 in the "Attending and resident in the operating room" group. Resident presence in the operating room was not associated with increased complications, except for bleeding transfusions (OR 1.71, CI 1.32-2.21, P ≤ 0.001). This study demonstrates that resident involvement in orthopedic shoulder surgery does not present an increased risk for 30-day complications when compared to surgeries performed with the attending surgeon alone.

What Is the Effect of Resident Involvement on Short-Term Outcomes after Distal Radius Fracture Surgery?

Background: The objective of this study was to assess whether resident involvement in distal radius fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) affect 30-day postoperative complication, hospital readmission, reoperation and operative time. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database by querying the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for distal radius fracture ORIF from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014. A final cohort of 5,693 adult patients who underwent distal radius fracture ORIF during the study period were included. Baseline patient demographics and comorbidities, intraoperative factors, including operative time and 30-day postoperative outcomes, including complications, readmission and reoperations, were collected. Bivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify variable associated with complication, readmission, reoperation and operative time. The significance level was adjusted using a Bonferroni correction as multiple comparisons were performed. Results: In this study of 5,693 patients who underwent distal radius fracture ORIF, 66 patients had a complication, 85 patients were readmitted and 61 patients underwent reoperation within 30 days of surgery. Resident involvement in the surgery was not associated with 30-day postoperative complication, readmission or reoperation, but was associated with longer operative time. Moreover, 30-day postoperative complication was associated with older age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension and bleeding disorder. Thirty-day readmission was associated with older age, ASA classification, diabetes mellitus, COPD, hypertension, bleeding disorder and functional status. Thirty-day reoperation was associated with higher body mass index (BMI). Longer operative time was associated with younger age, male sex and the absence of bleeding disorder. Conclusions: Resident involvement in distal radius fracture ORIF is associated with longer operative time, but no difference in rates of episode-of-care adverse events. Patients may be reassured that resident involvement in distal radius fracture ORIF does not negatively impact short-term outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Does the Surgical Assistant Influence Perioperative Outcomes Surrounding Cubital Tunnel Surgery?

Background: Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow is the second most common upper extremity compressive neuropathy and surgical treatment often involves surgical trainee involvement. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effect of trainees and surgical assistants on outcomes surrounding cubital tunnel surgery. Methods: This retrospective study included 274 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome who underwent primary cubital tunnel surgery at two academic medical centres between 1 June 2015 and 1 March 2020. The patients were divided into four main cohorts based on primary surgical assistant: physician associates (PA, n = 38), orthopaedic or plastic surgery residents (n = 91), hand surgery fellows (n = 132), or both residents and fellows (n = 13). Exclusion criteria included patient age <18 years, revision surgery as the index procedure, prior traumatic ulnar nerve injury and concurrent procedures not related to cubital tunnel surgery. Demographics, clinical variables and perioperative findings were collected through chart reviews. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed, and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Patients in all cohorts had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. There was a significantly higher rate of subcutaneous transposition in the PA cohort (39.5% PA vs. 13.2% Resident vs. 19.7% Fellow vs. 15.4% Resident + Fellow). Presence of surgical assistants and trainees had no association with length of surgery, complications and reoperation rates. Although male sex and ulnar nerve transposition were associated with longer operative times, no explanatory variables were associated with complications or reoperation rates. Conclusions: Surgical trainee involvement in cubital tunnel surgery is safe and has no effect on operative time, complications or reoperation rates. Understanding the role of trainees and measuring the effect of graduated responsibility in surgery is important for medical training and safe patient care. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).