Postoperative Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Following Multiligament Knee Reconstruction

Impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears on player efficiency ratings and salary in National Basketball Association over the past 20 years: a retrospective case control study

OBJECTIVES

Players in the National Basketball Association (NBA) are at high risk for ACL tears which are detrimental to their career due to the months of rehabilitation. The authors hypothesize that after anterior crucial ligament (ACL) injury, older players will be less likely to return to the NBA, players that do return will have a lower performance efficiency rating (PER), and the decrease in PER will be associated with a lower salary.

METHODS

This case-control study utilized the publicly available database maintained by the NBA, professional basketball players from 2002 to 2022 who suffered an ACL tear were identified. Controls, without ACL tears, were matched by age, BMI, position, race, and average minutes played before the injury date to uninjured controls. Return to NBA, pre-injury and post-return player efficiency ratings (PER), and salary change after injury were analyzed by multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 67 players suffered an ACL tear. Fifty-six (83.6%) players returned to the NBA at some point after their injury, while 11 (16.4%) did not. Multivariate logistic regression showed that older age and the presence of multi-ligament injury predicted retiring from the NBA (ß = 1.4 and 10.7). Older age and greater minutes played before surgery to be the only significant predictors of decreased PER after return to the NBA (ß = -0.5 and -0.2). Players with a multiyear contract and with improvements in PER after injury tended to have greater salary increases (ß = 6.5 and 0.7). All p < 0.05. PER in players with ACL tears decreased by about 3 points (13.1 to 9.9) compared to controls without ACL tears (13.2 to 12.9).

CONCLUSION

Older age and multiligament injuries are associated with retiring for the NBA; older and increased minutes played are associated with a decreased PER upon return; and, PER decreases are associated with decreased salary. Players with ACL tears, even when case-control matched, showed decreased PER upon return. These results can be attributed to age-related changes in athleticism and health.

Arthritis After Multiligamentous Knee Injuries: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the incidence of knee arthritis following multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) and assess other outcomes including conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), return to work, return to sports, and patient satisfaction.

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases was conducted for studies published up to April 2024. Studies focusing on patients with multiligamentous knee injuries undergoing reconstruction were included. Primary outcome was arthritis incidence; secondary outcomes included conversion to TKA, return to work, return to sports, and patient satisfaction. Data extraction and statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc statistic software, with pooled incidence rates calculated via random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistic.

Results

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed a high incidence of knee arthritis after MLKIs, with a pooled incidence of 65.0% (95% CI 35.4% to 89.4%) among 158 patients, indicating substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 92.9%). Conversion to TKA was reported in four studies with a pooled rate of 9.5% (95% CI: 5.4% to 14.6%) across 151 patients (I2 = 0%). Return to work was reported in two studies, showing a pooled rate of 93.5% (95% CI: 71.0% to 99.7%) among 59 patients (I2 = 83.4%). Return to sports was assessed in three studies, with a pooled rate of 70.8% (95% CI 48.2% to 88.9%) among 73 patients (I2 = 75.0%). Patient satisfaction, reported in two studies, demonstrated a pooled rate of 82.5% (95% CI 73.0% to 90.2%) among 72 patients (I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

MLKIs are associated with a high incidence of arthritis. However, it remains an effective intervention that facilitates a high rate of return to work, sports participation, and patient satisfaction.

Multiligament Knee Injuries: Updates of the Debates

Background

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKI) constitute a complex and challenging problem. They can have life-modifying consequences, such as the development of osteoarthritis, and an inability to return to work or sport. At present, there is insufficient high-level evidence or expert consensus to support one management strategy over another.

Purpose

The purpose of this article is to review the updates of the debates about multiligament knee injuries, diagnosis, treatment options, and rehabilitation protocols. This article also aimed to elucidate expert opinions on controversial issues in MLKI from scholars from Egypt and the Arab world.

Study Design

Comprehensive review; Level of evidence, 5.

Methods

Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) databases were searched between inception and February 2024. The terms: 'multi-ligament' OR 'multiligament' OR 'multi ligament' OR multiple ligaments' AND 'knee' were used to extract relevant studies.

Results

Overall, 1009 eligible studies were identified. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, there were 251 articles; of which there were 24 systematic reviews and 227 clinical studies.

Conclusion

The relative rarity of MLKI makes it difficult to perform good-powered prospective randomized studies evaluating these injuries. The debates are expected due to the diversity of presentations of MLKI with regard to types of injured ligaments, site of injury within the ligament, time of presentation, and the different management methods. Thorough knowledge and experience are mandatory to tailor a diagnostic workup and management plan for each case.

Patients undergoing multiligament knee reconstruction injured during pivoting sports demonstrate similar clinical, functional and return to sport outcomes by 2 years compared with those undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study investigates the clinical and activity-based outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) versus multiligamentous knee reconstruction (MLKR) following a pivoting sports injury.

METHODS

Fifty MLKR patients were included, of which 20 (40%) were injured during pivoting sports. A further 50 patients undergoing ACLR following an injury during pivoting sports were consecutively recruited for comparison. Patients were assessed before the surgery and at 6-, 12- and 24 months with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Tegner activity scale (TAS) and anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) score. Knee movement, the single (SHD) and triple (THD) hop tests for distance, and peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength were assessed, with Limb Symmetry Indices (LSIs) calculated. Outcomes were compared across groups: (1) ACLR (n = 50), (2) MLKR (n = 50) and (3) MLKR due to pivoting sport injury (n = 20).

RESULTS

IKDC, TAS and ACL-RSI scores remained lower (p < 0.05) in the full MLKR versus ACLR cohort at all timepoints. Comparing the ACLR and MLKR cohort that had injuries specifically during pivoting sports, the IKDC (p < 0.001) and TAS (p = 0.009) were higher in the ACLR group at 6 months, and the ACL-RSI was higher at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 (p = 0.007) months, there were no further differences. Hop and knee extensor strength LSIs were lower (p < 0.05) in the full MLKR (versus ACLR) cohort at all timepoints (apart from the 24-month SHD LSI). However, the ACLR group only demonstrated greater LSIs than the pivoting sport MLKR for the SHD at 6 months (p < 0.001), and knee extensor strength at 6 (p < 0.001) and 12 (p < 0.001) months.

CONCLUSIONS

While the recovery of patients undergoing MLKR due to a pivoting sports injury is delayed compared with their ACLR counterparts, the clinical outcome and activity profile are similar by 24 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A comparative analysis of autograft choices of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and their effects on muscle strength and joint biomechanics

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is crucial to restore knee stability and function after ACL injuries, especially in physically active individuals. Despite advances in surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols, the choice of autograft has a significant impact on postoperative recovery, particularly on muscle strength and joint biomechanics. In this study, the effects of four autografts are investigated: Iliotibial band (ITB), combined ITB and hamstring tendon (ITB + HT), hamstring tendon (HT) and bone-tendon-bone (BTB) on quadriceps and hamstring peak torque (QPT and HPT) recovery and hamstring to quadriceps ratio (H:Q) to assess knee stability and function.

Methods

Forty-two active males (mean ± standard deviation of age: 31.5 ± 6.1 years, height: 177 ± 6 cm, weight: 76 ± 11 kg, body mass index: 24.5 ± 2.2 kg/m²) with primary ACL ruptures were allocated to the four graft groups (ITB: n = 16, ITB + HT: n = 12, HT: n = 7, BTB: n = 7) and underwent a standardized rehabilitation protocol. Quadriceps and hamstring peak torque (QPT and HPT, respectively) as indicators of isokinetic muscle strength were assessed both postoperatively and follow-up after approximately six months (mean 6.29 ± 1.70 months).

Results

Significant differences in QPT and HPT recovery between the healthy and injured legs were found in all graft groups (P < 0.001). The BTB group showed the largest QPT deficit between healthy and injured legs (Δ = 133.4 Nm, Cohen's d = 8.05) and HPT deficit (Δ = 41.1 Nm, Cohen's d = 4.01). In contrast, the ITB + HT group showed the smallest deficits in QPT (Δ = 22.5 Nm, Cohen's d = 0.73) and HPT (Δ = 13.5 Nm, Cohen's d = 1.21). The BTB group also showed the largest deviation in H:Q ratios (Δ = -0.23, Cohen's d = 2.70), while the HT group showed a more balanced recovery with smaller significant deficits in H:Q ratios (Δ = -0.07, Cohen's d = 0.46).

Conclusion

The BTB graft showed the most pronounced variations in QPT and HPT between healthy and injured legs in the short term, indicating the importance of longitudinally monitoring knee stability to determine the best autograft choice for ACLR. While all graft types contribute to muscle strength recovery, the HT graft may provide advantages in balancing muscle strength and potentially enhancing knee stability.

All-Inside Bicruciate Ligament and Open Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction With Suture Augmentation

Background

Multiligamentous knee injuries (MLKIs) are complex, often highly traumatic injuries that require broad surgical techniques to restore joint stability. This study outlines novel surgical techniques for posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstruction with suture augmentation in the context of bicruciate reconstruction.

Indications

Reconstruction is indicated in complete tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and PLC due to joint instability. Allografts augmented with suture augmentation may be implemented at surgeon and patient discretion for enhanced long-term graft viability and have the benefits of lower donor morbidity with allografts along with suture augmentation to prevent stretching of allografts.

Technique Description

The ACL was reconstructed with all-inside tunnels and allograft usage, and the same was performed for single-bundle allograft PCL reconstruction. The PLC reconstruction consisted of a modified open Arciero technique in which the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) and popliteus were reconstructed using 1 continuous allograft, and additional suture augmentation was performed for the LCL to prevent stretching. The PCL was fixed first, after which the ACL and the PLC were fixed.

Results

At 6 weeks postoperatively, the patient continues to progress in restoring passive range of motion and tolerance of partial weightbearing. Barring any potential complications, a full recovery is expected in approximately 9 to 12 months, as is consistent with the MLKI recovery protocol.

Discussion/Conclusion

This study describes the surgical management of a Schenck knee dislocation class III-L injury with concomitant Arciero open PLC reconstruction in a 65-year-old man. The ideal strategy for reconstruction of MLKIs is unclear and warrants further evidence to help guide treatment in the context of concomitant injuries.

Patient Consent Disclosure Statement

The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Multiligament knee injury (MLKI): an expert consensus statement on nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation

Multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs) represent a broad spectrum of pathology with potentially devastating consequences. Currently, disagreement in the terminology, diagnosis and treatment of these injuries limits clinical care and research. This study aimed to develop consensus on the nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation strategies for patients with MLKI, while identifying important research priorities for further study. An international consensus process was conducted using validated Delphi methodology in line with British Journal of Sports Medicine guidelines. A multidisciplinary panel of 39 members from 14 countries, completed 3 rounds of online surveys exploring aspects of nomenclature, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation and future research priorities. Levels of agreement (LoA) with each statement were rated anonymously on a 5-point Likert scale, with experts encouraged to suggest modifications or additional statements. LoA for consensus in the final round were defined 'a priori' if >75% of respondents agreed and fewer than 10% disagreed, and dissenting viewpoints were recorded and discussed. After three Delphi rounds, 50 items (92.6%) reached consensus. Key statements that reached consensus within nomenclature included a clear definition for MLKI (LoA 97.4%) and the need for an updated MLKI classification system that classifies injury mechanism, extent of non-ligamentous structures injured and the presence or absence of dislocation. Within diagnosis, consensus was reached that there should be a low threshold for assessment with CT angiography for MLKI within a high-energy context and for certain injury patterns including bicruciate and PLC injuries (LoA 89.7%). The value of stress radiography or intraoperative fluoroscopy also reached consensus (LoA 89.7%). Within treatment, it was generally agreed that existing literature generally favours operative management of MLKI, particularly for young patients (LoA 100%), and that single-stage surgery should be performed whenever possible (LoA 92.3%). This consensus statement will facilitate clinical communication in MLKI, the care of these patients and future research within MLKI.

Modern multiligament knee injury surgical reconstruction techniques can achieve excellent knee function and patient satisfaction, with low complication rates

PURPOSE

To report on the recovery of strength and functional capacity symmetry following multiligament knee surgical reconstruction (MLKR), as well as the capacity of athletes to return to sport.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study recruited 47 patients undergoing MLKR between February 2018 and July 2021. Forty patients had full outcome assessment postoperatively at 6, 12 and 24 months and were included in the analysis, 75% were knee dislocation one injuries and 60% were injured playing sport. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessed included the International Knee Documentation Committee score, the Knee Outcome Survey, the Lysholm Knee Score and the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Patient satisfaction was also assessed. Objective assessment included assessment of active knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), the single (single horizontal hop for distance [SHD]) and triple (triple horizontal hop for distance [THD]) hop tests for distance and peak isokinetic knee flexor/extensor torque.

RESULTS

All PROMs significantly improved (p < 0.001) from presurgery to 24 months postsurgery. At 24 months, 70% of patients were satisfied with their sports participation. Active knee flexion (p < 0.0001) and extension (p < 0.0001) ROM significantly improved over time, as did the limb symmetry indices (LSIs) for the SHD (p < 0.0001), THD (p < 0.0001), peak knee extensor (p < 0.0001) and flexor (p = 0.012) torque. While LSIs for the SHD, THD and knee flexor strength tended to plateau by 12 months, knee extensor strength continued to improve from 12 to 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients undergoing modern MLKR surgical techniques and rehabilitation can achieve excellent knee function, with low complication rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Return to Sport After Multiligament Knee Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Purpose

The objective of this study was to conduct a comprehensive assessment of MLKI outcome studies in order to ascertain the overall rates of return to sport following MLKI.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA guidelines. Quality assessment of the systematic review was performed using the MINORS Score. The following search terms were browsed in the title, abstract, and keyword fields: "multiligament knee" or "MLKI" AND "return to sport" or "sports activity" or "athletes" or "sports" or "sportsman". The resulting measures extracted from the studies were the rate of RTS, level of RTS, complications, revision surgery, Tegner, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Lysholm and anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI).

Results

A total of 439 patients were included in the study, of whom 383 (87.2%) were male and 56 (22.8%) were female. The mean age at surgery was 28.06 ± 8.93 years. The mean time from injury to surgery was 97.68 ± 127.81 weeks, while the mean follow-up was 42.83 ± 39.22 months. Of 312 patients who completed the follow-up and reported to be sportsmen before surgery, 184 (58.97%) returned to the same or higher pre-injury level, 58 (18.58%) returned to a lower level, while 69 (22.11%) did not return to sports activity. The author analysed the Tegner score in three studies and noted a decrease compared to the pre-injury level (from 7.12 ± 0.8 pre-injury to 4.59 ± 0.57 at the final follow-up; p < 0.001). At the final follow-up, 4 studies analysed IKDC with a mean value of 75.14 ± 9.6, 3 reported a mean Lysholm of 51.81 ± 27.6, and two reported a mean ACL-RSI of 64.82 ± 0.149. Among the 439 patients, a total of 90 (20.5%) complications/re-operations were reported, while a total of 29 (6.6%) failures were recorded.

Conclusions

Return to sport after MLKI occurs in approximately 75% of surgically treated patients, though return to high-level sport is about 60% of the patients. Furthermore, one in five patients report complications, while the failure rate is relatively low (< 7%).

Level of Evidence

Systematic review of level 4.

Patient Reported Clinical Outcomes Following PCL Suture Augmentation in Patients with Multiligamentous Knee Injury: A Retrospective Observational Study

Purpose

To compare the patient-reported outcomes between patients with posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction or repair alone versus PCL reconstruction or repair with internal bracing (IB) in the context of multi-ligament knee injuries (MLKI).

Methods

All patients who underwent surgical management of MLKI at two institutions between 2006 and 2020 were retrospectively identified and offered participation in the study. Patient reported outcomes were measured via three instruments: Lysholm Knee score, Multiligament Quality of Life (ML-QOL), and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive testing (CAT). The postoperative outcomes and reoperation rates were compared between the internal bracing and non-internal bracing groups.

Results

Fifty-two patients were analyzed; 34 were included in the IB group (17.6% female; age 33.1 ±1.60 years), and 18 were included in the non-IB group (11.1% female; age 34.1 ±3.72 years). Mean follow-up time of the entire cohort was 1.44 ± 0.22 years (IB: 1.21 ± 0.18; non-IB: 2.1 ±0.65). There were no significant differences between PROMIS CAT [PROMIS Pain (54.4 ±1.78 vs 51.7 ±1.70, p=0.319), Physical Function (44.3 ±2.27 vs 47.9 ±1.52, p=0.294), Mobility (44.0 ±1.71 vs 46.1 ±2.10, p=0.463)], ML-QOL [ML-QOL Physical Impairment (40.7 ±4.21 vs 41.7±5.10, p=0.884), Emotional Impairment (49.2 ±4.88 vs 44.7±5.87, p=0.579), Activity Limitation (43.5 ±4.56 vs 31.5±3.62, p=0.087), Societal Involvement (44.9 ±4.96 vs 37.5 ±5.30, p=0.345)] and Lysholm knee score (61.8 ±4.55 vs 61.0 ±4.95, p=0.916) postoperatively compared to the non-IB group.

Conclusion

In this group of patients, function and patient-reported outcomes between patients treated with PCL reconstruction and repair without internal brace versus those with additional internal brace augmentation were not significantly different. Further research encompassing a larger patient sample is necessary to investigate the efficacy of the internal brace for PCL injury in the context of MLKI injuries.

Return to Sport After Multiligament Knee Injury in Young Athletes

Background

While return to sport (RTS) in young athletes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been well studied, little is known regarding their rate of RTS after multiligament knee injury (MLKI).

Purpose

To assess the level of and factors associated with RTS after MLKI in young athletes.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 116 patients aged ≤23 years who had sustained an injury to ≥2 knee ligaments and undergone operative reconstruction or repair of ≥1 ligament. Our primary outcome was self-reported RTS at the preinjury level or higher. We estimated the likelihood of RTS using binomial logistic regression. Secondary variables included the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SF), ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical and mental health summaries.

Results

A total of 30 (25.9%) patients (24 men, 6 women; mean age, 18.1 ± 2.5 years) completed patient-reported outcome surveys at a mean follow-up of 7.8 years (median, 6.6 years [range, 1.1-19.5 years]). A total of 28 patients underwent surgical treatment of ≥2 ligaments. RTS was achieved by 90% of patients, and 43.3% returned to their preinjury level or higher. Patients who had played sports at a higher level before injury were more likely to RTS at their preinjury level or higher (odds ratio [OR], 3.516 [95% CI, 1.034-11.955]; P = .044), while those who played cutting sports were less likely to do so (OR, 0.013 [95% CI, 0.000-0.461; P = .017). Patients who achieved RTS at their preinjury level or higher had significantly higher IKDC-SF and ACL-RSI scores versus patients who did not (P = .001 and P = .002, respectively). The number of ligaments injured, age, mental health diagnosis, and SF-12 scores were not associated with the ability to RTS at the preinjury or higher levels.

Conclusion

Most young athletes who sustained MLKI were able to return to play at some level, but a minority returned to their preinjury level. Patients who did return at preinjury or higher levels had higher IKDC-SF and ACL-RSI scores than those who did not. Performance in cutting and/or pivoting sports was negatively associated with RTS.

Diagnosis and treatment strategies of the multiligament injured knee: a scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To map the current literature evaluating the diagnosis and treatment of multiligament knee injuries (MLKIs).

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley frameworks were followed. A three-step search strategy identified relevant published literature comprising studies reporting on at least one aspect in the diagnosis or treatment of MLKI in adults. Data were synthesised to form a descriptive analysis and thematic summary.

RESULTS

Overall, 417 studies were included. There was a substantial chronological increase in the number of studies published per year, with 70% published in the last 12 years. Of included studies, 128 (31%) were narrative reviews, editorials or technical notes with no original data. The majority of studies (n=239, 57%) originated from the USA; only 4 studies (1%) were of level I evidence. Consistent themes of contention included clinical assessment, imaging, operative strategy, timing of surgery and rehabilitation. There was a lack of gender and ethnic diversity reported within patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There remains insufficient high-level evidence to support definitive management strategies for MLKI. There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome reporting in current MLKI literature, precluding robust comparison, interpretation and pooling of data. Further research priorities include the development of expert consensus relating to the investigation, surgical management and rehabilitation of MLKI. There is a need for minimum reporting standards for clinical studies evaluating MLKI.

Femur Length is Correlated with Isometric Quadriceps Strength in Post-Operative Patients

BACKGROUND

Few existing studies have examined the relationship between lower extremity bone length and quadriceps strength.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the relationship between lower extremity, tibia and femur lengths, and isometric quadriceps strength in patients undergoing knee surgery. The null hypothesis was that there would be no correlation between lower extremity length and isometric quadriceps strength.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Patients with full-length weightbearing radiographs that underwent isometric quadriceps strength testing after knee surgery were included. Using full-length weightbearing radiographs, limb length was measured from the ASIS to the medial malleolus; femur length was measured from the center of the femoral head to the joint line; tibia length was measured from the center of the plateau to the center of the plafond. Isometric quadriceps strength was measured using an isokinetic dynamometer. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to report the correlation between radiographic limb length measurements. A Bonferroni correction was utilized to reduce the probability of a Type 1 error.

RESULTS

Forty patients (26 males, 14 females) with an average age of 25.8 years were included. The average limb, femur, and tibia lengths were not significantly different between operative and non-operative limbs (p>0.05). At an average of 5.8±2.5 months postoperatively, the peak torque (156.6 vs. 225.1 Nm), average peak torque (151.6 vs. 216.7 Nm), and peak torque to bodyweight (2.01 vs 2.89 Nm/Kg) were significantly greater in the non-surgical limb (p<0.01). Among ligament reconstructions there was a significant negative correlation between both limb length and strength deficit (r= -0.47, p=0.03) and femur length and strength deficit (r= -0.51, p=0.02). The average strength deficit was 29.6% among the entire study population; the average strength deficit was 37.7% among knee ligament reconstructions. For the non-surgical limb, femur length was significantly correlated with peak torque (r = 0.43, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Femur length was significantly correlated with the isometric quadriceps peak torque for non-surgical limbs. Additionally, femur length and limb length were found to be negatively correlated with quadriceps strength deficit among ligament reconstruction patients. A combination of morphological features and objective performance metrics should be considered when developing individualized rehabilitation and strength programs.