No change in apolipoprotein AI metabolism when subcutaneous insulin infusion is replaced by intraperitoneal insulin infusion in type 1 diabetic patients

Physiological effects of intraperitoneal versus subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The intraperitoneal route of administration accounts for less than 1% of insulin treatment regimes in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1). Despite being used for decades, a systematic review of various physiological effects of this route of insulin administration is lacking. Thus, the aim of this systematic review was to identify the physiological effects of continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion (CIPII) compared to those of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in patients with DM1. Four databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL) were searched beginning from the inception date of each database to 10^th of July 2020, using search terms related to intraperitoneal and subcutaneous insulin administration. Only studies comparing CIPII treatment (≥ 1 month) with CSII treatment were included. Primary outcomes were long-term glycaemic control (after ≥ 3 months of CIPII inferred from glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels) and short-term (≥ 1 day for each intervention) measurements of insulin dynamics in the systematic circulation. Secondary outcomes included all reported parameters other than the primary outcomes. The search identified a total of 2242 records; 39 reports from 32 studies met the eligibility criteria. This meta-analysis focused on the most relevant clinical end points; the mean difference (MD) in HbA1c levels during CIPII was significantly lower than during CSII (MD = -6.7 mmol/mol, [95% CI: -10.3 –-3.1]; in percentage: MD = -0.61%, [95% CI: -0.94 –- 0.28], p = 0.0002), whereas fasting blood glucose levels were similar (MD = 0.20 mmol/L, [95% CI: -0.34–0.74], p = 0.47; in mg/dL: MD = 3.6 mg/dL, [95% CI: -6.1–13.3], p = 0.47). The frequencies of severe hypo- and hyper-glycaemia were reduced. The fasting insulin levels were significantly lower during CIPII than during CSII (MD = 16.70 pmol/L, [95% CI: -23.62 –-9.77], p < 0.0001). Compared to CSII treatment, CIPII treatment improved overall glucose control and reduced fasting insulin levels in patients with DM1.

Dyslipidemia in Type 1 Diabetes: AMaskedDanger

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) patients show lipid disorders which are likely to play a role in their increased cardiovascular (CV) disease risk. Quantitative abnormalities of lipoproteins are noted in T1D with poor glycemic control. In T1D with optimal glycemic control, triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol are normal or slightly decreased whereas HDL-cholesterol is normal or slightly increased. T1D patients, even with good glycemic control, show several qualitative and functional abnormalities of lipoproteins that are potentially atherogenic. An association between these abnormalities and CV disease risk has been reported in recent studies. Although the mechanisms underlying T1D dyslipidemia remain unclear, the subcutaneous route of insulin administration, that is responsible for peripheral hyperinsulinemia, is likely to be an important factor.

Lipid disorders in type 1 diabetes

Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) also present with lipid disorders. Quantitative abnormalities of lipoproteins are observed in T1D patients with poor glycaemic control (increased plasma triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol) or nephropathy (increased triglycerides and LDL cholesterol, low level of high density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol). In cases of T1D with optimal glycaemic control, plasma triglycerides and LDL cholesterol are normal or slightly decreased, while HDL cholesterol is normal or slightly increased. Several qualitative abnormalities of lipoproteins, which are potentially atherogenic, are observed in patients with T1D, even in those with good metabolic control. These abnormalities include increased cholesterol-to-triglyceride ratios within very low-density lipoprotein (VLDLs), increased triglycerides in LDLs and HDLs, compositional changes in the peripheral layer of lipoproteins, glycation of apolipoproteins, increased oxidation of LDLs and an increase in small, dense LDL particles. These qualitative changes in lipoproteins are likely to impair their function. In vitro, VLDLs and LDLs from patients with T1D induced abnormal responses in the cellular cholesterol metabolism of human macrophages. HDLs from patients with T1D are thought to be less effective in promoting cholesterol efflux from cells, and have been shown to have reduced antioxidative and vasorelaxant properties. These qualitative abnormalities are not fully explained by hyperglycaemia and may be partly due to peripheral hyperinsulinaemia associated with subcutaneous insulin administration. However, the precise consequences of these qualitative lipid changes on the development of cardiovascular disease in T1D are, as yet, unknown.