Use of quantitative lung scintigraphy to predict postoperative pulmonary function in lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy

SPECT/CT Accurately Predicts Postoperative Lung Function in Patients with Limited Pulmonary Reserve Undergoing Resection for Lung Cancer

Background: Preoperative prediction of postoperative pulmonary function after anatomical resection for lung cancer is essential to prevent long-term morbidity and mortality. Here, we compared the accuracy of hybrid single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) with traditional anatomical and planar scintigraphy approaches in predicting postoperative pulmonary function in patients with impaired lung function. Methods: We analyzed the predicted postoperative pulmonary function in patients undergoing major anatomical lung resection, applying a segment counting approach, planar perfusion scintigraphy (PPS), and SPECT/CT-based lung function quantification. Results: In total, 120 patients were evaluated, of whom 82 were included in the study. Postoperative lung function tests were obtained in 21 of 82 patients. The preoperative SPECT/CT-based quantification yielded very accurate results compared to the actual postoperative FEV1 and DLCO values. The linear regression analysis showed that the SPECT/CT-based analysis predicted postoperative FEV1 (%) and DLCO values more accurately than the segment counting approach or PPS. Accordingly, 58/82 patients would qualify for anatomical lung resection according to the SPECT-based quantification, 56/82 qualified according to the PPS (Mende), and only 47/82 qualified according to the segment counting method. Moreover, we noted that the SPECT-predicted FEV1 values were very close to the actual postoperative values in emphysema patients, and selected patients even showed improved lung function after surgery. Conclusions: Anatomically driven methods such as SPECT/CT yielded a very accurate prediction of the postoperative pulmonary function. Accordingly, applying SPECT/CT revealed more patients who would formally qualify for lung resection. We suggest SPECT/CT as the preferred method to evaluate eligibility for lung surgery in selected patients with impaired pulmonary reserve.

Pulmonary function changes after thoracoscopic lobectomy versus intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Thoracoscopic segmentectomy is increasingly used in the surgical treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, it remains unclear whether pulmonary function loss after thoracoscopic lung resection is in direct proportion to the number of resected segments, and thus intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy has the function-preserving advantage over thoracoscopic lobectomy.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, spirometry tests were performed preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The observed functional loss was compared with the expected loss estimated by the segment counting method. Resection extent index was introduced as the number of resected segments to total number of segments in the corresponding lobe. Spirometry changes after thoracoscopic lobectomy and intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy were compared using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

There were 338 thoracoscopic lobectomies and 321 thoracoscopic segmentectomies. Overall, the observed pulmonary function loss after segmentectomy was significantly less than after lobectomy. But the observed functional loss was significantly greater than the expected loss after segmentectomy. And pulmonary function loss per segment resected was almost doubled after segmentectomy comparing to lobectomy. For segmentectomies with a resection extent index less than 0.5, especially single segmentectomies, pulmonary function loss was significantly less than after corresponding lobectomies. Otherwise, no significant differences in spirometry changes between lobectomies and segmentectomies were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary function loss after thoracoscopic lung resection cannot be accurately evaluated by the number of resected segments. According to the resection extent index, intentional thoracoscopic segmentectomy may help preserve more pulmonary function than thoracoscopic lobectomy only when less than half of the corresponding lobe are resected.

Our current understanding of and approach to the management of lung cancer with pulmonary hypertension

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is a frequent pathology for which the best curative treatment is pulmonary resection. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare disease but pulmonary hypertension associated with parenchymal disease or left heart disease is frequently observed in these patients. The diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension before lung resection makes the perioperative management of these patients more difficult and sometimes leads to rejecting patients for surgery.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a review of literature on PubMed on Pulmonary hypertension associated lung resection, preoperative assessment of lung resection and perioperative management of PH patients, including guidelines and clinical trials.In this review, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the pre and perioperative management of patients with suspected or confirmed PH who can benefit from surgical treatment of lung cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Management of PH patients before lung resection should include a very careful workup including at least right heart catheterization with evaluation of the targeted PH treatment in an expert center and evaluation of other comorbidities. Perioperative management must be carried out in a specialized center.

Comparison between lung perfusion scan and single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for predicting postoperative lung function after pulmonary resection in patients with borderline lung function

OBJECTIVES

We compared the usefulness of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) and lung perfusion scintigraphy (LPS) for predicting postoperative lung function by comparing patients with borderline lung function.

METHODS

A total of 274 patients who underwent simultaneous LPS and SPECT/CT and had a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) or diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) under 80% were included. The % uptake by LPS was calculated by the posterior-oblique method. The concordance and difference of the % uptake, predicted postoperative (ppo) FEV1 and ppoDLCO as determined by 2 methods were evaluated. The association between ppo values and actual postoperative FEV1 and DLCO was examined. Subgroup analysis was conducted in redo-operation cases.

RESULTS

The % uptake of each lobe, except the right middle lobe, showed fair concordance (concordance correlation coefficients for right upper, middle, lower, left upper and lower lobe = 0.61, 0.37, 0.71, 0.66 and 0.69, respectively). ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO also revealed high concordance between both methods (concordance correlation coefficient = 0.93 for ppoFEV1 and concordance correlation coefficient = 0.92 for ppoDLCO) without a significant difference (P = 0.42 for ppoFEV1; P = 0.31 for ppoDLCO). Both ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO showed a significantly high correlation with the actual FEV1 (r = 0.77, P < 0.01 for LPS, r = 0.77, P < 0.01 for SPECT/CT) and DLCO (r = 0.62, P < 0.01 for LPS, r = 0.62, P < 0.01 for SPECT/CT). High concordance of % uptake, ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO was present in redo-operation patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LPS and SPECT/CT showed high predictability for actual postoperative lung function, and LPS showed good performance to estimate ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO with reference to SPECT/CT, even in redo-operation cases.

Dynamic Chest X-Ray Using a Flat-Panel Detector System: Technique and Applications

Dynamic X-ray (DXR) is a functional imaging technique that uses sequential images obtained by a flat-panel detector (FPD). This article aims to describe the mechanism of DXR and the analysis methods used as well as review the clinical evidence for its use. DXR analyzes dynamic changes on the basis of X-ray translucency and can be used for analysis of diaphragmatic kinetics, ventilation, and lung perfusion. It offers many advantages such as a high temporal resolution and flexibility in body positioning. Many clinical studies have reported the feasibility of DXR and its characteristic findings in pulmonary diseases. DXR may serve as an alternative to pulmonary function tests in patients requiring contact inhibition, including patients with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 or other infectious diseases. Thus, DXR has a great potential to play an important role in the clinical setting. Further investigations are needed to utilize DXR more effectively and to establish it as a valuable diagnostic tool.

Comparison between quantitative computed tomography, scintigraphy, and anatomical methods for prediction of postoperative FEV1 and DLCO: effects of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease status and resected lobes

Background

Postoperative assessment of pulmonary function is important for estimating the risk of thoracic surgery and long-term disability following pulmonary resection, including predicted postoperative (ppo) forced expiratory volume (FEV) in one second (ppoFEV₁) and percent predicted lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (ppo%DLCO) estimation. The ppo values were compared using four different estimation methods between chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-COPD patients and according to the resected lobe.

Methods

This prospective study included 59 eligible patients requiring single lobectomy and succeeded in performing pulmonary function tests at 3 and 12 months after lobectomy. The ppoFEV₁ and ppo%DLCO were compared with poFEV₁ and po%DLCO obtained at 3 and 12 months after lobectomy. The ppo values were estimated using the four usual methods: the 19-segment anatomical technique (S), perfusion scintigraphy (Q), quantitative CT (CT), and quantitative CT with low attenuation volume (CT_LAV) subtraction.

Results

For non-COPD and COPD patients, the smallest mean difference between ppo and po values was observed by S for FEV₁ and %DLCO. Based on the resected lobe, the smallest mean difference was observed by (I) Q for right upper lobectomy (RUL) excluding %DLCO at 12 months by S, (II) S for left upper lobectomy (LUL), (III) CT and CT_LAV for right lower lobectomy (RLL), and (IV) CT and CT_LAV for left lower lobectomy (LLL) at 12 months. The ppo values calculated by S for RUL (FEV₁ at 3 and 12 months and %DLCO at 3 months) and by all four methods for LLL (FEV₁ and %DLCO at 3 months) were smaller than the po values.

Conclusions

The S method is adequate for calculating ppoFEV₁ and ppo%DLCO when patients are classified as non-COPD and COPD. However, S sometimes overestimates the ppoFEV₁ and ppo%DLCO when patients are classified according to the resected lobe. The CT_LAV method may be the method of choice instead of S for calculating ppoFEV₁ and ppo%DLCO in patients who undergo lung lobectomy despite the presence or absence of airflow limitation.

[Preconditioning of the lungs and circulation before visceral and thoracic surgical interventions]

BACKGROUND

Estimation of the perioperative risk plays a decisive role in the surgical indications, particularly in view of the demographic change. For this reason, prehabilitation concepts for reducing perioperative risk nowadays play an increasingly important role.

OBJECTIVE

Presentation of the current recommendations for preoperative diagnostics in thoracic surgical interventions as well as existing prehabilitation concepts and their practical applicability.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A selective review of the literature was carried out by searching the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library and ISRCTN, including the guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the European Society of Thoracic Surgery (ESTS).

RESULTS

Preconditioning includes the conservative treatment of underlying diseases, smoking cessation and prehabilitation. Prehabilitation is an increasingly pressing concept in routine clinical practice, even though the evidence is limited due to the very heterogeneous study situation. Overall, however, there is a tendency for positive effects on the quality of life and postoperative complications as well as convalescence.

CONCLUSION

In addition to preoperative diagnostics to assess the perioperative risk, effective preconditioning of patients is also necessary. For this an interdisciplinary approach including anesthesia, pneumology, psychotherapy and physiotherapy is necessary. In addition to the conservative medicinal optimization, prehabilitation concepts are gaining in importance and will certainly become established in routine clinical practice. From the surgical perspective, minimally invasive approaches and parenchyma-sparing resections also serve to reduce risks.

Predicting Lung Function Following Lobectomy: A New Method to Adjust for Inherent Selection Bias

BACKGROUND

Predictions that overestimate post-lobectomy lung function are more likely than underestimates to lead to lobectomy. Studies of post-lobectomy lung function have included only surgical patients, so overestimates are overrepresented. This selection bias has led to incorrect estimates of prediction bias, which has led to inaccurate threshold values for determining lobectomy eligibility.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to demonstrate and adjust for this selection bias in order to arrive at correct estimates of prediction bias, the 95% limits of agreement, and adjusted threshold values for determining when exercise testing is warranted.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients evaluated for lobectomy. We used multiple imputations to determine postoperative results for patients who did not have surgery because their predicted postoperative values were low. We combined these results with surgical patients to adjust for selection bias. We used the Bland-Altman method and the bivariate normal distribution to determine threshold values for surgical eligibility.

RESULTS

Lobectomy evaluation was performed in 114 patients; 79 had lobectomy while 35 were ineligible based on predicted values. Prediction bias using the Bland-Altman method changed significantly after controlling for selection bias. To achieve a postoperative FEV1 > 30% and DLCO ≥30%, a predicted FEV1 > 46% and DLCO ≥53% were required. Compared to current guidelines, using these thresholds would change management in 17% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The impact of selection bias on estimates of prediction accuracy was significant but can be corrected. Threshold values for determining surgical eligibility should be reassessed.

Pulmonary Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients With Flat Chests After Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Severe chest wall deformation is generally a contraindication for lung transplantation; however, it is not known whether patients with flat chests have reduced postoperative exercise capacity and pulmonary function. This study's purpose was to investigate the relationship between preoperative thoracic shape and postoperative exercise capacity and pulmonary function in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

METHODS

Twenty recipients who underwent successful bilateral living-donor lobar lung transplantation were evaluated. To analyze postoperative graft function in relation to preoperative thoracic shape, 40 donor grafts implanted into 20 recipients were divided into two groups: flat chest group and normal chest group. Flat chest is diagnosed when the thoracic anteroposterior diameter to transverse diameter ratio is 1:3 or less.

RESULTS

The ratio of the postoperative forced vital capacity to the preoperatively estimated forced vital capacity was significantly lower in the flat chest group than in the normal chest group 1 year after lung transplantation (p = 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in postoperative 6-minute walk distances between the two groups. Furthermore, the thoracic anteroposterior diameter to transverse diameter ratio in the flat chest group significantly increased after lung transplantation (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Although postoperative pulmonary function was significantly poorer for patients with flat chests than for patients with normal chests, their postoperative exercise capacity was equivalent. We also found that flat chest severity significantly improved after lung transplantation. Our study, the first investigating postoperative functional status in patients with flat chests, clearly shows that it is possible to perform lung transplantation in such patients with acceptable outcomes.

Comparison of Two Different Segmentation Methods on Planar Lung Perfusion Scan with Reference to Quantitative Value on SPECT/CT

PURPOSE

Until now, there was no single standardized regional segmentation method of planar lung perfusion scan. We compared planar scan based two segmentation methods, which are frequently used in the Society of Nuclear Medicine, with reference to the lung perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) derived values in lung cancer patients.

METHODS

Fifty-five lung cancer patients (male:female, 37:18; age, 67.8 ± 10.7 years) were evaluated. The patients underwent planar scan and SPECT/CT after injection of technetium-99 m macroaggregated albumin (Tc-99 m-MAA). The % uptake and predicted postoperative percentage forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppoFEV1%) derived from both posterior oblique (PO) and anterior posterior (AP) methods were compared with SPECT/CT derived parameters. Concordance analysis, paired comparison, reproducibility analysis and spearman correlation analysis were conducted.

RESULTS

The % uptake derived from PO method showed higher concordance with SPECT/CT derived % uptake in every lobe compared to AP method. Both methods showed significantly different lobar distribution of % uptake compared to SPECT/CT. For the target region, ppoFEV1% measured from PO method showed higher concordance with SPECT/CT, but lower reproducibility compared to AP method. Preliminary data revealed that every method significantly correlated with actual postoperative FEV1%, with SPECT/CT showing the best correlation.

CONCLUSION

The PO method derived values showed better concordance with SPECT/CT compared to the AP method. Both PO and AP methods showed significantly different lobar distribution compared to SPECT/CT. In clinical practice such difference according to different methods and lobes should be considered for more accurate postoperative lung function prediction.

Improved prediction of lobar perfusion contribution using technetium-99m-labeled macroaggregate of albumin single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography with attenuation correction

OBJECTIVE

Lung cancer resection can require removal of an entire lobe and, at times, bilobectomy or pneumonectomy. Many patients will also have significantly compromised lung function that requires limiting the extent of surgery or could preclude surgery altogether. The preoperative assessment should include predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppoFEV1), because a ppoFEV1 of <40% predicts significantly increased perioperative morbidity. The ppoFEV1 can be estimated by multiplying the preoperative FEV1 by the residual perfused territory percentage, as predicted on planar perfusion scintigraphy (PPS). However, ppoFEV1 using PPS has shown variable correlation with spirometry-measured postoperative FEV1.

METHODS

We propose an improved method for assessing regional lung perfusion in preoperative lung surgery patients. Patients undergo single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging with attenuation correction using the conventional perfusion agent, technetium-99m-labeled macroaggregate of albumin. The CT image provides information for manual segmentation of each lobe. These segmentations are applied to the SPECT images to determine lobar perfusion. This proposed method was compared with PPS.

RESULTS

This technique was evaluated in 17 patients. As expected, the perfusion contributions of the right and left lungs, calculated from SPECT/CT, correlated closely with those obtained from PPS (Pearson r=0.995). However, the lobar perfusion contributions obtained by PPS and SPECT/CT were significantly different, by 2 methods of comparison (Hotelling's P=1.7×10(-6) and P=1.7×10(-4)).

CONCLUSIONS

This new SPECT/CT technique provides an anatomically more accurate assessment of lobar perfusion. This technique can refine which patients should be operative candidates and allow better prediction of postoperative function in contrast to the anatomically inaccurate planar scintigraphic predictions, which often underestimate the postoperative FEV1. This new technique is expected to have a significant effect on the resectability of patients with lung cancer.

A new method to predict values for postoperative lung function and surgical risk of lung resection by quantitative breath sound measurements

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated quantitative acoustic measurements, as a simpler alternative to perfusion scintigraphy, for estimation of predicted postoperative (ppo) lung function after resection surgery in our patient population.

METHODS

Patients with lung cancer, considered as candidates for lung resection, were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent lung function testing and quantitative breath sound testing by vibration response imaging (VRI) on the same day. A subset of patients also had perfusion testing. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) predictions derived from VRI testing were compared with perfusion values and actual FEV(1) values at 1 month postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-three subjects (40 males; age 66±8 y) participated. There was high correlation between both methods for the calculation of ppoFEV(1)% (R=0.94; n=39) and ppoFEV (L) (R=0.90; n=39). PpoFEV(1) were 58±18% versus 56±20% and 1.69±0.49 L versus 1.62±0.52 L, based on perfusion and VRI methods, respectively. In 92% (36/39) of calculations, the difference between the 2 methods was <10%. High correlations also existed between VRI and perfusion for the calculation of ppoDLCO% (R=0.95; n=37) and ppoDLCO mL/min/mm Hg (R=0.90; n=37). VRI predictions showed good correlation for the 34 patients with actual postoperative lung function (R=0.88 and R=0.80 for FEV(1)% and FEV(1)L, respectively). Accuracy of the VRI to predict surgical risk (<40% cutoff threshold for ppo values) compared with actual postoperative values was 85% (29/34).

CONCLUSIONS

Predictions of postoperative lung function using VRI agree well with radionuclide techniques and actual measured postoperative values. VRI may provide a noninvasive, simpler alternative for estimation of ppo values, particularly when perfusion testing is not readily available.

Clinical application of dual-source CT in the evaluation of patients with lung cancer: correlation with perfusion scintigraphy and pulmonary function tests

PURPOSE

This study was done to assess the diagnostic potential of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) in the functional evaluation of lung cancer patients undergoing surgical resection. The CT data were compared with pulmonary perfusion scintigraphy and pulmonary function tests (PFTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients were evaluated with DSCT, scintigraphy and PFTs. The DSCT scan protocol was as follows: two tubes (80 and 140 kV; Care Dose protocol); 70 cc of contrast material (5 cc/s); 5- to 6-s scan time; 0.6 mm collimation. After the automatic calculation of lung perfusion with DSCT and quantification of air volumes and emphysema with dedicated software applications, the perfusional CT studies were compared with scintigraphy using a visual score for perfusion defects; CT air volumes and emphysema were compared with PFTs.

RESULTS

The values of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of DSCT compared with perfusion scintigraphy as the reference standard were: 0.88, 0.84, 0.90, 0.93 and 0.88, respectively. The McNemar test did not identify significant differences either between the two imaging techniques (p=0.07) or between CT and PFTs (p=0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

DSCT is a robust and promising technique that provides important and accurate information on lung function.

Guideline-oriented perioperative management of patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Increased airway hyperresponsiveness is a major concern in the perioperative management of patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Guidelines using evidence-based medicine are continually being updated and published regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of these respiratory disorders. Perioperative management in these patients involves: (1) adequate control of airway hyperresponsiveness, including detection of purulent sputum and infection before surgery; (2) evidence-based control of anesthesia; and (3) the aggressive use of beta-2 adrenergic stimulants and the systemic administration of steroids for the treatment of acute attacks. Good preoperative control, including the use of leukotriene antagonists, can reduce the incidence of life-threatening perioperative complications. Awareness of recent guidelines is thus important in the management of patients with airway hyperresponsiveness. This review covers the most recent guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Predicted Versus Observed FEV1 and Dlco After Major Lung Resection: A Prospective Evaluation at Different Postoperative Periods

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to prospectively assess the agreement between predicted and observed postoperative values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and carbon monoxide lung diffusion capacity (DLCO) after major lung resection.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive patients undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung cancer in a single center were prospectively evaluated with complete preoperative and repeated postoperative measurements of FEV1 and DLCO. Predicted postoperative (ppo) values were compared with the observed postoperative values. The precision of ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO at 3 months was subsequently evaluated by plotting the cumulative predicted postoperative values against the observed ones.

RESULTS

After lobectomy, observed values were 11% lower at discharge (p < 0.0001), and 6% higher at 3 months (p < 0.0001), compared with ppoFEV1. No differences were noted at 1 month. Observed DLCO values were 12% lower than predicted at discharge (p < 0.0001) and 10% higher than predicted at 3 months (p < 0.0001), without differences noted at 1 month. After pneumonectomy, no differences were noted between predicted and observed values of FEV1 at every evaluation time, and of DLCO at discharge and 1 month. However, the observed DLCO value was 17% higher than predicted at 3 months (p = 0.002). Plots of predicted and observed postoperative values at 3 months showed that ppoFEV1 predicted worse at lower levels of ppoFEV1, and ppoDLCO was constantly lower than the observed values at every ppoDLCO levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the imprecision of the prediction of postoperative function, particularly of gas exchange determinants and after pneumonectomy, and at low ppoFEV1 levels, the use of ppoFEV1 and ppoDLCO for risk stratification needs to be reconsidered.

Usefulness of lung perfusion scintigraphy before lung cancer resection in patients with ventilatory obstruction

BACKGROUND

The study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative lung perfusion scintigraphy performed by planar acquisition and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in predicting postoperative pulmonary function of patients with resectable lung cancer and obstructive ventilatory defect.

METHODS

The study enrolled 39 patients (mean age, 67 +/- 2.1 years). All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests. Cut-off values for postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) were 65% of the predicted value for pneumonectomy and 45% for lobectomy. A semiquantitative analysis of planar and SPECT lung perfusion scintigraphy images was performed preoperatively to estimate postoperative predicted FEV1 (FEV1ppo). Relationships between FEV1ppo and measured postoperative FEV1 were tested by the Pearson correlation and Bland Altman agreement tests.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight lobectomies and 11 pneumonectomies were performed. The FEV1ppo estimated by mean planar lung scintigraphy was 1.85 +/- 0.38 L, with a Pearson correlation coefficient to the measured FEV1 of 0.8632 (p < 0.001). The mean FEV1ppo estimated by SPECT was 1.78 +/- 0.31 L, with a Pearson coefficient to the measured FEV1 of 0.8527 (p < 0.001). Both values showed a more significant correlation with postoperative measured FEV1 after lobectomy (p < 0.001) than after pneumonectomy (p = 0.045). The Bland Altman test confirmed satisfactory agreement of FEV1ppo estimated by both planar lung scintigraphy and SPECT with FEV1 measured by spirometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Both planar lung scintigraphy and SPECT can accurately predict postoperative FEV1 and can therefore be considered reliable tools in establishing operability of patients with lung cancer and ventilatory obstruction.

Le bilan préopératoire du cancer bronchique

INTRODUCTION

The overall prognosis of non-small cell carcinoma of the bronchus (NSCLC) remains poor on account of frequently late diagnosis and associated co-morbidity preventing the optimal treatment of the tumour. Surgical resection remains the best curative treatment for limited stage disease.

STATE OF THE ART

The pre-operative assessment should determine whether the extent of the tumour permits complete resection and whether the physiological state of the patient would tolerate the curative resection required. The ultimate goal is to improve 5-year survival. In the case of initial inoperability the assessment should determine whether pre-operative oncological treatment might make an advanced tumour operable (e.g. stage IIIA), or whether targeted medical treatment might improve the patient sufficiently to tolerate an intervention initially judged too risky. The rapid development of the technical modalities available for the assessment requires a continuous review of the current practice guidelines. Positron emission tomography has considerably augmented the accuracy of classical radiological assessment. Nevertheless staging by imaging alone remains imprecise to the extent that invasive examinations are still necessary to provide histological proof of the clinical stage of NSCLC. The techniques for assessing mediastinal invasion are developing rapidly and becoming more accurate and less invasive. Mediastinoscopy enhanced by modern video technology, ultrasound guided endoscopic biopsies and thoracoscopy are complimentary rather than competing techniques. The functional assessment should estimate the operative risk of the proposed pulmonary resection, identify the targeted actions aimed at reducing this risk or, in the absence of such actions, suggest less invasive but less well validated surgical techniques or even palliative treatments. When the operative risk cannot be reduced its precise estimation at least allows the patient to decide whether the risk seems acceptable in relation to the chances of a cure.

VIEWPOINT AND CONCLUSIONS

In the future the pre-operative assessment of NSCLC should improve the detection of micro-metastases in order to optimise the choice of induction and adjuvant therapies. The increasing use of induction chemotherapy before surgical resection can only increase the importance of a detailed assessment for the selection of patients and the evaluation of results.

Preoperative pulmonary evaluation of the thoracic surgical patient

Fig. 2 is an algorithm for the preoperative pulmonary evaluation of the lung resection candidate. Patients should undergo routine spirometry and diffusion capacity testing. If the FEV1 and DLCO are greater than 80% predicted, no further study is needed. When these parameters are less than 80%, some estimation of postoperative function is likely needed, taking into account the proposed resection. Patients with ppoFEV1 or ppoDLCO less than 40% are at increased risk of perioperative complications or death and should undergo formal exercise testing. A VO2max or ppoVO2max less than 10 mL/kg/min is associated with prohibitive risk for anatomic lung resection, and alternative treatment modalities should be considered.