Open Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia: Reassessment of Subjective and Objective Outcomes

Outcomes after revisional surgery for paraesophageal hernias at a high-volume tertiary care center

BACKGROUND

Although recurrences after repair of giant paraesophageal hernias (PEH) are common, revisional procedures are challenging and associated with higher complication rates than primary repair. Therefore, repair of recurrent PEH is often avoided except in symptomatic patients. Data describing operative outcomes in these infrequent cases is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to report and compare peri-operative outcomes of revisional PEH repair to similar patients undergoing primary surgery.

METHODS

A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was conducted on all adult patients undergoing primary repair of Type II-IV PEH and any revisional surgery for recurrent hiatal hernia after previous primary PEH repair (2012-2019). Patient and operative characteristics and post-operative outcomes were extracted from medical records. Patients were grouped into revisional (rPEH) and primary repair (pPEH). Coarsened exact matching was performed to create balanced cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 347 cases were identified. The matched cohort included 234 patients (rPEH: 46, pPEH: 188). Patient sex and comorbidities were well balanced, while those who underwent revisions were younger (64 ± 13 vs. 69 ± 11 years; p = 0.01). Median time between primary and rPEH was 40[17-121] months. Incidence of emergency repair were similar among groups (rPEH: 9(15%), pPEH: 14(8%); p = 0.10). All revisional cases commenced laparoscopically with 7(15%) requiring conversion to open. The conversion rate was higher for rPEH than primary surgery (7(15%) vs. 3(2%); p < 0.01), with the most common reasons being adhesions and gastric fundus injury. Intra-operative complications occurred in 12(26%) revisional cases, of which 58% were gastric fundus injuries. Median length of stay was longer for rPEH than pPEH (2[1-5] vs. 1[1-2] day; p = 0.02). Incidence of severe complications (rPEH: 5(11%), pPEH: 11(6%); p = 0.23) and reoperations (rPEH: 2(4%), pPEH: 7(4%); p = 0.84) were similar between groups. There were no peri-operative deaths.

CONCLUSION

In a high-volume tertiary care center, repair of recurrent giant paraesophageal hernias can be performed successfully laparoscopically in the majority of cases with acceptable morbidity and peri-operative outcomes in comparison to primary surgery.

[Surgical strategy for hiatal hernias]

The indications for surgical treatment of hiatus hernias differentiate between type I and types II, III and IV hernias. The indications for a type I hernia should include a proven reflux disease but the indications for surgical treatment of types II, III and IV hernias are mandatory due to the symptoms with problems in the passage of food and due to the sometimes very severe possible complications. The primary aims of surgery are the repositioning of the herniated contents and a hiatoplasty, which includes a surgical narrowing of the esophageal hiatus by suture implantation. In addition, depending on the clinical situation other procedures, such as hernia sac removal, mesh implantation, gastropexy and fundoplication can be considered. There are various approaches to the repair, all of which have individual advantages and disadvantages. An adaptation to the specific needs situation of the patient and the expertise of the surgeon is therefore essential.

Research protocol for the Paraesophageal hernia symptom tool, a prospective multi-center cohort study to identify the need and threshold for surgery and assess the symptom response to surgery

Large hiatus hernias with a significant paraesophageal component (types II-IV) have a range of insidious symptoms. Management of symptomatic hernias includes conservative treatment or surgery. Currently, there is no paraesophageal hernia disease-specific symptom questionnaire. As a result, many clinicians rely on the health-related quality of life questionnaires designed for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GORD) to assess patients with hiatal hernias pre- and postoperatively. In view of this, a paraesophageal hernia symptom tool (POST) was designed. This POST questionnaire now requires validation and assessment of clinical utility. Twenty-one international sites will recruit patients with paraesophageal hernias to complete a series of questionnaires over a five-year period. There will be two cohorts of patients-patients with paraesophageal hernias undergoing surgery and patients managed conservatively. Patients are required to complete a validated GORD-HRQL, POST questionnaire, and satisfaction questionnaire preoperatively. Surgical cohorts will also complete questionnaires postoperatively at 4-6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, and then annually for a total of 5 years. Conservatively managed patients will repeat questionnaires at 1 year. The first set of results will be released after 1 year with complete data published after a 5-year follow-up. The main results of the study will be patient's acceptance of the POST tool, clinical utility of the tool, assessment of the threshold for surgery, and patient symptom response to surgery. The study will validate the POST questionnaire and identify the relevance of the questionnaire in routine management of paraesophageal hernias.

Laparoscopic fundoplication for para-oesophageal hernia repair improves respiratory function in patients with dyspnoea: a prospective cohort study

Background

Dyspnoea in patients with a para-oesophageal hernia (PEH) occurs in 7% to 32% of cases and is very disabling, especially in elderly patients, and its origin is not well defined. The present study aims to assess the impact of PEH repair on dyspnoea and respiratory function.

Methods

From January 2019 to May 2021, all consecutive patients scheduled for PEH repair presenting with a modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score ≥ 2 for dyspnoea were included. Before and 2 months after surgery, dyspnoea was assessed by both the dyspnoea visual analogue scale (DVAS) and the mMRC scale, as well as pulmonary function tests (PFTs) by plethysmography.

Results

All 43 patients that were included had pre- and postoperative dyspnoea assessments and PFTs. Median age was 70 years (range 63–73.5 years), 37 (86%) participants were women, median percentage of the intrathoracic stomach was 59.9% (range 44.2–83.0%), and median length of hospital stay was 3 days (range 3–4 days). After surgery, the DVAS decreased statistically significant (5.6 [4.7–6.7] vs. 3.0 [2.3–4.4], p < 0.001), and 37 (86%) patients had a clinically significant decrease in mMRC score. Absolute forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), total lung capacity, and forced vital capacity also statistically significantly increased after surgery by an average of 11.2% (SD 17.9), 5.0% (SD 13.9), and 10.7% (SD 14.6), respectively. Furthermore, from the subgroup analysis, it was identified that patients with a lower preoperative FEV1 were more likely to have improvement in it after surgery. No correlation was found between improvement in dyspnoea and FEV1. There was no correlation between the percentage of intrathoracic stomach and dyspnoea or improvement in PFT parameters.

Conclusion

PEH repair improves dyspnoea and FEV1 in a statistically significant manner in a population of patients presenting with dyspnoea. Patients with a low preoperative FEV1 are more likely to have improvement in it after surgery.

The other explanation for dyspnea: giant paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair routinely improves pulmonary function

Paraesophageal hiatal hernias (PEHs) are most commonly associated with gastrointestinal symptoms; less widely appreciated is their potentially important influence on respiratory function. We hypothesize that surgical repair of PEH will significantly improve not only gastrointestinal symptoms, but also preoperative dyspnea and spirometry scores. A prospective Institutional Review Board-approved database was used to review all patients undergoing PEH repair from 2000 to 2016. Patients with pre- and postoperative pulmonary function tests assessed by spirometry were included. Postoperative changes in spirometry measurements were compared to PEH size as reflected by the percentage of intrathoracic stomach observed on preoperative contrast studies. Patients were stratified according to improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Patients with >12% ('significant') improvement in FEV1 after surgery were compared to the remaining patient population. In total, 299 patients met the inclusion criteria. Symptomatic improvement in respiratory function was noted in all patients after PEH repair. Age, gender, BMI, presenting symptoms, Charlson comorbidity index as well as preoperative comorbidities did not significantly impact the functional outcome. Spirometry results improved in 80% of the patients, 21% of whom showed an improvement of >20% compared to the preoperative level. 'Significant' improvement in respiratory function was seen in 122 of 299 (41%) patients. Patients presenting with moderate and severe preoperative pulmonary obstruction demonstrated 'significant' improvement in FEV1 in 48% and 40% of cases, respectively. Large PEHs, characterized by a percentage of intrathoracic stomach >75%, was strongly associated with 'significant' improvement in FEV1 (P = 0.001). PEHs can impact subjective and objective respiratory status and surgical repair can result in a significant improvement in dyspnea and pulmonary function score that is independent of preoperative pulmonary disease. Gastric herniation of more than 75% was associated with higher possibility for improvement of pulmonary function tests. Patients with persistent and unexplained dyspnea and coexistent PEH should be assessed by an experienced surgeon for consideration of elective repair.

Beyond Belsey: complex laparoscopic hiatus and diaphragmatic hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Diaphragmatic and hiatus hernias can cause mild chronic symptoms or have an acute presentation with gastric volvulus and obstruction. Elective or emergency surgery is indicated in symptomatic patients and nowadays is generally performed laparoscopically.

METHODS

We report four different types of hernias: a giant hiatus hernia following a gastric pull-up for recurrent congenital diaphragmatic hernia; a Bochdalek hernia in a pregnant young woman; concomitant hiatus and Morgagni hernias; and a giant hiatus hernia occupying the right chest. All were approached laparoscopically, either electively or as an emergency.

RESULTS

Surgery led to a resolution of symptoms in all the cases. We had no any intraoperative complications. Two patients developed minor postoperative complications (chest infection). No recurrences were found during a mean follow-up of 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Transabdominal laparoscopic approach is a safe and feasible approach to all cases of symptomatic hiatus and diaphragmatic hernia.

Long-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes of Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

Background and Objectives:

There is a lack of consensus on the optimal repair technique and the definition of good outcomes in paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. We reviewed long-term patient-reported outcomes of open and laparoscopic PEH repair to assist with our future surgical consent process.

Methods:

This was a retrospective case–control study including all patients with PEH repair performed from 2000 through 2012 at a single center without the use of mesh. We mailed questionnaires to patients to assess reoperation, symptom control, and satisfaction.

Results:

Chart review identified 217 patients who underwent PEH repair. Nineteen died during the follow-up period. Of the 106 returning the questionnaire, 87 underwent laparoscopic repair, and 19 had open repair, with follow-up of 6.6 (SD 3.9) years and 7.0 (SD 4.1) years, respectively. Reoperation rates were 9.9% and 5.3%, respectively (P = .720). Dysphagia, heartburn, and regurgitation improved in 95.4% of patients after laparoscopic repair and 89.5% after open repair (P = .318). Medication for symptom control was necessary in 54.0% of patients after laparoscopic repair and 26.3% after open repair (P = .029). In each group, 90% stated that they would still choose to have the operation (P = .713).

Conclusions:

Long-term patient-specific outcomes showed comparable, encouraging results between open and laparoscopic repair of PEH without mesh reinforcement. However, half of those undergoing laparoscopic repair required the use of medication for symptom control. This study adds to the literature describing long-term patient-specific outcomes and can be useful when counseling patients about PEH repair.

Minimally Invasive Surgery Should Be the Standard of Care for Paraesophageal Hernia Repair

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been universally embraced for paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair. The aims of this study were: (a) to assess the national utilization of MIS for PEH repair and (b) to compare the perioperative outcomes between MIS and open procedures METHODS: A retrospective population-based analysis was performed using the National Inpatient Sample for the period 2000-2013. Adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent PEH repair were included. Linear and logistic regression, adjusted for patient and hospital characteristics, were used to assess the effect of minimally invasive surgery on patient outcomes RESULTS: A total of 63,812 patients were included. An abdominal approach was used in 60,087 (94.2%) patients and a thoracic approach in 3725 (5.8%) cases. Between 2000 and 2013, the rate of MIS significantly increased in abdominal and thoracic procedures. Patients undergoing MIS were less likely to experience postoperative infection, bleeding, cardiac failure, renal failure, respiratory failure, shock, and had a lower inpatient mortality. In addition, MIS significantly reduced the length of hospital stay and the overall cost.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS is associated with significantly better perioperative outcomes and lower costs. These data strongly support the MIS approach as standard of care for PEH repair.

Recurrence after composite repair of a giant hiatus hernia: 'the golf club' deformity is a distinctive clinical and radiological picture

Background Recurrence of a hiatus hernia after cardiopexy repair can obstruct the lower oesophagus but also provide characteristic radiographic images after a barium meal. Case History Two patients with recurrence of a hiatus hernia underwent repeat surgery. Here, we provide and discuss diagnostic imaging, surgical findings and outcome for these male and female patients. Conclusions Repeat surgery is indicated in patients with recurrence of a hiatus hernia after repair.

Surgery for Type III-IV hiatal hernia: anatomical recurrence and global results after elective treatment of short oesophagus with open and minimally invasive surgery

OBJECTIVES

Type III-IV hiatal hernia (HH) is associated with a true short oesophagus in more than 50% of cases; dedicated treatment of this condition might be appropriate to reduce the recurrence rate after surgery. A case series of patients receiving surgery for Type III-IV hernia was examined for short oesophagus, and the results were analysed.

METHODS

From 1980 to 1994, 60 patients underwent an open surgical approach, and the position of the oesophago-gastric junction was visually localized; from 1995 to 2013, 48 patients underwent a minimally invasive approach, and the oesophago-gastric junction was objectively localized using a laparoscopic-endoscopic method. The patients underwent a timed clinical-instrumental follow-up that included symptoms assessment, barium swallow and endoscopy. The results were considered to be excellent in the absence of symptoms and oesophagitis; good, if symptoms occurred two to four times a month in the absence of oesophagitis; fair, if symptoms occurred two to four times a week in the presence of hyperaemia, oedema and/or microscopic oesophagitis; and poor, if symptoms occurred on a daily basis in the presence of any grade of endoscopic oesophagitis, HH of any size or type, or the need for antireflux medical therapy. The follow-up time was calculated from the time of surgery to the last complete follow-up.

RESULTS

Among the open surgery patients, 78% underwent abdominal fundoplication, 10% the Belsey Mark IV procedure, 8% laparotomic Collis-Nissen fundoplication and 3% the Pearson operation. Among the minimally invasive surgery patients, 44% underwent a laparoscopic floppy Nissen procedure and 56% a left thoracoscopic Collis-laparoscopic Nissen procedure. The postoperative mortality and complication rates were 1.6% (1/60) and 15% for open surgery and 4.1% (2/48) and 12.5% for minimally invasive surgery. A total of 105 patients were followed up for a median period of 96 months. Five relapses occurred after open surgery (5/59, 8%) and two after minimally invasive surgery (2/46, 4%). Among the 105 patients, excellent, good, fair and poor outcomes were observed in 38%, 44%, 9% and 9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggested that the selective treatment of short oesophagus in association with a Type III-IV hernia reduced the anatomical recurrence rate and achieved satisfactory outcomes.

CLINICALTRIALSGOV ID

NCT01606449.

Incidence of true short esophagus among patients submitted to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication

Introduction

The last two decades have observed development of surgical treatment of benign conditions of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), including anti-reflux surgery, due to the growing popularity of the laparoscopic approach. Migration of the fundoplication band and recurrent hiatal hernia are a result of the lack of correct diagnosis and appropriate management of the so-called short esophagus. According to various authors, short esophagus is present in up to 60% of patients qualified for anti-reflux surgery. However, some researchers question the existence of this condition.

Aim

To analyze the prevalence of short esophagus in patients subjected to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Material and methods

The study included 202 patients who were subjected to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Results

As many as 96% of the patients qualified for the surgical treatment showed supradiaphragmatic location of the high pressure zone. The extent of GEJ protrusion ranged from 0 cm to 3 cm (mean: 2 cm). The extent of dissection within the mediastinum was determined by the level of GEJ protrusion, and ranged from 5 cm to 12 cm (mean: 6 cm). Upon complete mobilization of the esophagus within the mediastinum, no cases of significantly shortened esophagus, precluding downward retraction of at least a 2.5-cm segment below the diaphragmatic crura, were documented. Therefore, none of the patients required Collis gastroplasty.

Conclusions

The presence of “true” short esophagus is a sporadic finding among patients qualified for anti-reflux surgery. Mediastinal dissection of the esophagus and its mobilization at an appropriate, individually defined level seems a sufficient treatment in the vast majority of these patients.

Improved Patient Outcomes in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair Using a Laparoscopic Approach: A Study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Data

A consensus on the optimal surgical approach for repair of a paraesophageal hernia has not been reached. The aim of this study was to examine the outcomes of open and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs (PHR), both with and without mesh. A review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2007 to 2011 was conducted. Patients who underwent an open or laparoscopic PHR were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included infections, respiratory and cardiac complications, intraoperative or perioperative transfusions, sepsis, and septic shock. Statistical analyses using odds ratios were performed comparing the open and laparoscopic approaches. A total of 4470 patients were identified using NSQIP; 2834 patients had a laparoscopic repair and the remaining 1636 patients underwent an open PHR. Compared with the laparoscopic approach, the open repair group had significantly higher 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 4.75; 95% confidence interval, 2.67 to 8.47; P < 0.0001). The laparoscopic approach had a statistically significant decrease in infections, respiratory and cardiac events/complications, transfusion requirements, episodes of sepsis, and septic shock ( P < 0.05). Our data suggest increased perioperative morbidity associated with an open PHR compared with laparoscopic. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the primary or secondary outcomes in patients repaired with mesh compared with those without. The overall use of mesh in paraesophageal hernia repairs has increased. The NSQIP data show significantly increased 30-day mortality in open repair compared with laparoscopic as well as a significantly higher perioperative complication rate.

Novel combined VATS/laparoscopic approach for giant and complicated paraesophageal hernia repair: description of technique and early results

BACKGROUND

The laparoscopic approach for repair of giant and/or recurrent paraesophageal hernias (PEH) is challenging, due to limited access to the dissection of the hernia sac into the proximal mediastinum and esophageal mobilization through the diaphragmatic hiatus. An esophageal lengthening procedure is often necessary, due to the difficulty in obtaining adequate intra-abdominal esophageal length. We, therefore, developed a VATS and laparoscopic technique, which allows for safe and extensive thoracic dissection and intra-abdominal gastric fixation and cruroplasty, yet preserving the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.

METHODS

We use a standard VATS approach. The hernia sac, optimally visualized, is dissected posteriorly from the thoracic aorta, inferiorly from its diaphragmatic attachments, anteriorly from the pericardium, and laterally from the mediastinal pleura. The esophagus is completely mobilized up to the aortic arch, and the anterior vagus nerve is released from its bronchial branches. The hernia sac is then opened, dissected, and completely removed. The hernia content is then reduced into the abdomen laparoscopically, the short gastric vessels are divided and the gastric fundus is completely mobilized. The hiatus is closed with interrupted sutures, and the cruroplasty is buttressed with a biological mesh. A floppy Nissen or a partial fundoplication and a gastropexy are done for reflux control and gastric fixation.

RESULTS

From January 2012 to January 2014, we treated 18 patients (7 with type III PEH and 11 with type IV) with the above-described procedure. Six patients had previous history of antireflux surgery. We performed a planned laparotomy instead of laparoscopy in two patients, who needed concurrent repair of complex incisional hernias. We did not need esophageal lengthening procedures, nor experienced damages to thoracic structures in any patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our newly developed surgical approach has proven to be safe and feasible. This technique represents a good option for treatment of giant and complicated PEH.

Thirty-day outcomes of paraesophageal hernia repair using the NSQIP database: should laparoscopy be the standard of care?

BACKGROUND

Although surgical repair is universally recognized as the gold standard for treatment of paraesophageal hernia (PEH), the optimal surgical approach is still the subject of debate. To determine which surgical technique is safest, we compared the outcomes of laparoscopic (lap), open transabdominal (TA), and open transthoracic (TT) PEH repair using the NSQIP database.

STUDY DESIGN

From 2005 to 2011, we identified 8,186 patients who underwent a PEH repair (78.4% lap, 19.2% TA, 2.4% TT). Primary outcome measured was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, and NSQIP-measured postoperative complications. Multivariable analyses were performed to compare the odds of each outcome across procedure type (lap, TA, and TT) while adjusting for other factors.

RESULTS

Transabdominal patients had the highest 30-day mortality rate (2.6%), compared with 0.5% in the lap patients (p < 0.001) and 1.5% in TT patients. Mean length of stay was statistically significantly longer for TA and TT patients (7.8 days and 6.5 days, respectively) compared with lap patients (3.3 days). After adjusting for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, emergency cases, functional status, and steroid use, TA patients were nearly 3 times as likely as lap patients to experience 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.97; 95% CI, 1.69 to 5.20; p < 0.001). Moreover, TA and TT patients had significantly increased odds of overall (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.79 to 2.51; p < 0.001; OR 2.73; 95% CI 1.88 to 3.96; p < 0.001; respectively) and serious morbidity (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.53 to 2.37, p < 0.001; OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.54 to 4.00; p < 0.001; respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of published data indicating improved long-term outcomes after open TA or TT approach, our findings support the use of laparoscopy, whenever technically feasible, because it yields improved short-term outcomes.

Open versus laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia where only a portion of the stomach is in the chest, is associated with a lower mortality rate than open repair.

Background:

The literature reports the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach to paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair. However, its adoption as the preferred surgical approach and the risks associated with paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair have not been reviewed in a large database.

Method:

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset was queried from 1998 to 2005 for patients who underwent repair of a complicated (the entire stomach moves into the chest cavity) versus uncomplicated (only the upper part of the stomach protrudes into the chest) paraesophageal hiatal hernia via the laparoscopic, open abdominal, or open thoracic approach. A multivariate analysis was performed controlling for demographics and comorbidities while looking for independent risk factors for mortality.

Results:

In total, 23,514 patients met the inclusion criteria. By surgical approach, 55% of patients underwent open abdominal, 35% laparoscopic, and 10% open thoracic repairs. Length of stay was significantly reduced for all patients after laparoscopic repair (P < .001). Age ≥60 years and nonwhite ethnicity were associated with significantly higher odds of death. Laparoscopic repair and obesity were associated with lower odds of death in the uncomplicated group.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal hernia is associated with a lower mortality in the uncomplicated group. However, older age and Hispanic ethnicity increased the odds of death.

Surgical management of emergency and elective giant paraesophageal hiatus hernias

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists surrounding the laparoscopic approach to the repair of giant paraesophageal hiatus hernias (GPHHs), in regard to both long-term outcomes and its role in the emergency presentation. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of laparoscopic GPHH repair, compared with traditional open surgery, in both the elective and emergency setting.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Data regarding all patients who underwent GPHH repair between January 1994 and June 2008 were retrieved from the prospectively maintained Lothian Surgical Audit database. Demographic details, surgical approach (open/laparoscopic), conversion to an open procedure, complications, and recurrences were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients had GPHH repair. Attempted laparoscopic repair and conversion rates were 52 of 64 (81.2%) and 12 of 52 (23.1%), respectively. Including these conversions, 24 of 64 patients had an open repair. The mean postoperative hospital stay, complications, and mortality were significantly lower among the laparoscopic cohort. Twenty-five of 64 patients had surgery as an emergency admission. Postoperative mortality after emergency surgery was 5 of 25 (20.0%) compared with 3 of 39 (7.6%) among elective patients (P=.146). The recurrence rate after laparoscopic and open repair was 25.0% (10 of 40) and 8.3% (2 of 24), respectively (P=.184).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has confirmed that surgical repair of GPHH is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality, in both the elective and emergency setting. Although the laparoscopic approach should be attempted in the first instance, the open approach appears to have a lower recurrence rate.

The frequency of true short oesophagus in type II-IV hiatal hernia

OBJECTIVES

The misdiagnosis of short oesophagus may occur on recurrence of the hernia after surgery for type II-IV hiatal hernia (HH). The frequency of short oesophagus in type II-IV hernia is undefined. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of true short oesophagus in patients undergoing surgery for type II-IV hernia.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with type II-IV hernia underwent minimally invasive surgery. After full isolation of the oesophago-gastric junction, the position of the gastric folds was localized endoscopically and two clips were applied in correspondence. The distance between the clips and the diaphragm (intra-abdominal oesophageal length) was measured. When the intra-abdominal oesophagus was <1.5 cm after oesophageal mobilization, the Collis procedure was performed. After surgery, patients underwent a follow-up, comprehensive of barium swallow and endoscopy.

RESULTS

After mediastinal mobilization (median 10 cm), the intra-abdominal oesophageal length was >1.5 cm in 17 patients (4 type II, 11 type III and 2 type IV) and ≤ 1.5 cm in 17 patients (13 type III and 4 type IV hernia). No statistically significant differences were found between patients with intra-abdominal oesophageal length > or ≤ 1.5 cm with respect to symptoms duration and severity. Global results (median follow-up 48 months) were excellent in 44% of patients, good in 50%, fair in 3% and poor in 3%. HH relapse occurred in 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

True short oesophagus is present in 57% of type III-IV and in none of type II HHs. The intraoperative measurement of the submerged intra-abdominal oesophagus is an objective method for recognizing these patients.

Preliminary study of hiatal hernia repair using polyglycolic acid: trimethylene carbonate mesh

BACKGROUND

Repairing large hiatal hernias using mesh has been shown to reduce recurrence. Drawbacks to mesh include added time to place and secure the prosthesis as well as complications such as esophageal erosion. We used a laparoscopic technique for repair of hiatal hernias (HH) >5cm, incorporating primary crural repair with onlay fixation of a synthetic polyglycolicacid:trimethylene carbonate (PGA:TMC) absorbable tissue reinforcement. The purpose of this report is to present short-term follow-up data.

METHODS

Patients with hiatal hernia types I-III and defects >5cm were included. Primary closure of the hernia defect was performed using interrupted nonpledgeted sutures, followed by PGA:TMC mesh onlay fixed with absorbable tacks. A fundoplication was then performed. Evaluation of patients was carried out at routine follow-up visits. Outcomes measured were symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or other symptoms suspicious for recurrence. Patients exhibiting these complaints underwent further evaluation including radiographic imaging and endoscopy.

RESULTS

Follow-up data were analyzed on 11 patients. Two patients were male; 9 were female. The mean age was 60 years. The mean length of follow-up was 13 months. There were no complications related to the mesh. One patient suffered from respiratory failure, one from gas bloat syndrome, and another had a superficial port-site infection. One patient developed a recurrent hiatal hernia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small series, laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias >5cm with onlay fixation of PGA:TMC tissue reinforcement has short-term outcomes with a reasonably low recurrence rate. However, due to the preliminary and nonrandomized nature of the data, no strong comparison can be made with other types of mesh repairs. Additional data collection is warranted.

Repair of giant paraesophageal hernias routinely produces improvement in respiratory function

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of the clinical impact of giant paraesophageal hernias have historically focused on upper gastrointestinal symptoms. This study assesses the effect of paraesophageal hernia repair on respiratory function.

METHODS

All patients undergoing repair of giant paraesophageal hernia were prospectively entered into a database approved by the institutional review board. Patients had symptoms documented preoperatively, including dyspnea. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were done preoperatively and repeated a median of 106 days after repair (range, 16-660 days).

RESULTS

Preoperative and postoperative PFTs were obtained in 120 unselected patients treated for paraesophageal hernia between 2000 and 2010. Patients' median age was 74 years (range, 45-91 years), 74 (62%) were female, and median body mass index was 28.0 (range, 16.8-46.6). Median length of stay was 4 days (range, 3-10 days), and perioperative mortality was zero. Hernias were classified as type II in 3 (3%) patients, III in 92 (77%), and IV in 25 (21%). Percent of intrathoracic stomach was assigned from preoperative contrast studies and grouped as less than 50% (n = 6; 5%), 50% to 74% (n = 35; 29%), 75% to 99% (n = 29; 24%), and 100% (n = 50; 42%). Preoperative symptoms included heartburn 71 (59%), early satiety 65 (54%), dyspnea 63 (52%), chest pain 48 (40%), dysphagia 56 (47%), regurgitation 47 (39%), and anemia 44 (37%). PFTs significantly improved after paraesophageal hernia repair (mean volume change, percent reference change): forced vital capacity +0.30 L,+10.3%pred; FEV(1) +0.23 L,+10.4%pred (all P < .001); diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide +0.58 mL · mm Hg(-1) · min(-1) (P = .004), and +2.9%pred (P = .002). Greater improvements were documented in older patients with significant subjective respiratory symptoms and higher percent of intrathoracic stomach (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Paraesophageal hernia has a significant effect on respiratory function, which is largely underappreciated. This study demonstrates that these repairs can be done safely and supports routine consideration for elective repair; older patients with borderline respiratory function may achieve substantial improvements in their respiratory status and quality of life.

Paraesophageal hernia: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management controversies

Practically, hiatal hernias are divided into sliding hiatal hernias (type I) and PEH (types II, III, or IV). Patients with PEH are usually symptomatic with GERD or obstructive symptoms, such as dysphagia. Rarely, patients present with acute symptoms of hernia incarceration, such as severe epigastric pain and retching. A thorough evaluation includes a complete history and physical examination, chest radiograph, UGI series, esophagogastroscopy, and manometry. These investigations define the patient's anatomy, rule out other disease processes, and confirm the diagnosis. Operable symptomatic patients with PEH should be repaired. The underlying surgical principles for successful repair include reduction of hernia contents, removal of the hernia sac, closure of the hiatal defect, and an antireflux procedure. Debate remains whether a transthoracic, transabdominal, or laparoscopic approach is best with good surgical outcomes being reported with all three techniques. Placement of mesh to buttress the hiatal closure is reported to reduce hernia recurrence. Long-term follow-up is required to determine whether the laparoscopic approach with mesh hiatoplasty becomes the procedure of choice.

Long-term symptomatic outcome and radiologic assessment of laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

The long-term durability of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal herniation is uncertain. This study focuses on the long-term symptomatic and radiologic outcome of laparoscopic paraesophageal herniation repair.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2007, 70 patients (49 females, mean age +/- standard deviation 60.6 +/- 10.9 years) undergoing laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal herniation were studied prospectively. After a mean follow-up of 45.6 +/- 23.8 months, symptomatic (65 patients, 93%) and radiologic follow-up (60 patients, 86%) was performed by standardized questionnaires and esophagograms.

RESULTS

The symptomatic outcome was successful in 58 patients (89%), and gastroesophageal anatomy was intact in 42 patients (70%). The addition of a fundoplication was the only significant predictor of an unfavorable radiologic outcome in the univariate analysis (odds ratio .413; 95% confidence interval, .130 to 1.308; P = .125).

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term symptomatic outcome of laparoscopic repair of paraesophageal hiatal herniation was favorable in 89% of patients, and 70% had successful anatomic repair. The addition of a fundoplication did not prevent anatomic herniation.

Outcomes of surgical treatment of intrathoracic stomach

The purpose of this study is to assess the long-term outcomes after surgical repair of intrathoracic stomach. Prospectively collected data was retrospectively reviewed. Patients underwent a phone questionnaire 1 year postoperatively to assess gastroesophageal reflux disease-related symptoms and surgical satisfaction. In addition, objective evaluation for integrity of hiatal hernia repair was undertaken either by esophagram or endoscopy. Any recurrence was considered a failure. Forty-one patients underwent surgical repair of a large paraesophageal hernia with intrathoracic stomach during the study period. Thirty-four patients underwent a laparoscopic repair, and seven patients underwent a transthoracic repair. An antireflux procedure was performed on 28 patients, and 13 patients had only hernia reduction and hiatal closure. In the laparoscopic group, two patients required conversion to open laparotomy, as one was unable to tolerate the pneumoperitoneum, and the other had mediastinal bleeding. Thirty-eight (93%) were available for 1-year follow-up. There were three (7.8%) recurrences, one requiring emergency transabdominal repair, and the other two being asymptomatic 1-cm recurrences. All patients report a high degree of satisfaction with surgery. There is a high incidence of short esophagus in patients with intrathoracic stomach. The surgical repair is safe and durable, with high patient satisfaction at 1-year follow-up.

A surgical emergency due to an incarcerated paraesophageal hernia

Paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) are hernias in which the gastroesophageal junction stays where it belongs (attached at the level of the diaphragm), but part of the stomach passes or bulges into the chest beside the esophagus. It represents a small proportion of all hiatal hernias. It can lead to severe complications like incarceration, volvulus, or strangulation, which are true emergencies in the emergent department (ED). Paraesophageal hernia rarely features on a list of differential diagnoses of acute chest or epigastric pain. It could be treated as myocardial insult, and the outcome could be life-threatening. Thus, it is easily missed when ED physicians did not maintain a high index of suspicion. Multislice thoracoabdominal computed tomography scan is a very useful and reliable tool for diagnosis and detecting complications. Surgical repair of PEH provide excellent outcomes and have low complication rate compared with laparoscopic approach in the literature. Correct diagnosis and treatment can prevent life-threatening complications. We reported a case of PEH with incarceration of stomach and colon with initial presentations of nonspecific epigastralgia and anterior chest pain. It highlights the challenge that noncardiac chest pain presents to the ED physician.

Are Surgisis biomeshes effective in reducing recurrences after laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias?

Prosthetic repair is frequently advocated after repair of large hiatal hernias, and biomeshes have been proposed to help reduce the high recurrence rate. All patients undergoing laparoscopic repair of primary or recurrent large hiatal hernia, and with intraoperative finding of weak diaphragmatic pillars, as judged by the surgeon, were included, from June 2004 to July 2005, in a prospective observational study. In these patients, Surgisis biomeshes were employed to assist the repair. Six patients (4 for primary and 2 for recurrent hernia) received biomesh hiatoplasty. Four had mild dysphagia at 1 month that disappeared at the next follow-up. Three had slow radiologic transit through the esophagogastric junction, still present in 1 patient at 1 year. One patient had hernia recurrence 6 months after surgery and 2 other patients had radiologic recurrence of a small hernia at 1-year follow-up; in all 3, the recurrence was small and asymptomatic and none were reoperated. The short-term recurrence rate using biomesh for the laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias in patients with weak diaphragmatic pillars was high at 50%. Postoperative morbidity and mesh-related complications were almost absent. Biomeshes can be safely used as on lay reinforcement in hiatoplasty, but do not reduce the hiatal recurrence rate.

Current controversies in paraesophageal hernia repair

The management of paraesophageal hernia (PEH) has become one of the most widely debated and controversial areas in surgery. PEHs are relatively uncommon, often presenting in patients entering their seventh or eighth decades of life. Patients who have PEH often bear complicating medical comorbidities making them potentially poor operative candidates. Taking this into account makes surgical management of these patients all the more complex. Many considerations must be taken into account in formulating a management strategy for patients who have PEHs, and these considerations have led surgeons into ongoing debates in recent decades.

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: quality of life outcomes in the elderly

Paraesophageal hernias (PEH) occur when there is herniation of the stomach through a dilated hiatal aperture. These hernias occur more commonly in the elderly, who are often not offered surgery despite the failure of medical treatment to address mechanical symptoms and life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of laparoscopic repair of PEH on quality of life in an elderly population. Data were collected prospectively on 35 consecutive patients aged >70 years who had laparoscopic repair of a symptomatic PEH between December 2001 and September 2005. The change in quality of life was assessed using a validated questionnaire, the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD), and by patient interviews. Patients were assessed preoperatively, and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Mean patient age was 77 years (range 70-85); mean American Society of Anesthesiologists class was 2.7 (range 1-3). There were 28 women and 7 men. There was one readmission for acute reherniation, which required open revision. Total complication rate was 17.1%. All complications were treated without residual disability. There was no 30-day mortality, and median hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-14). Completed questionnaires were obtained in 30 of 35 patients (85.7%). There was a significant improvement in quality of life, as measured with QOLRAD, at all postoperative time points (P < 0.001). Laparoscopic PEH repair can be performed with acceptable morbidity in symptomatic patients refractory to conservative treatment and is associated with a significant improvement in quality of life. Our data support elective repair of symptomatic PEH in the elderly, a population who may not always be referred for a surgical opinion.

Review of outcome after laparoscopic paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair

Many studies have confirmed the effectiveness of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair, but there are reports of high recurrence rates after surgery. We have conducted a review of the literature to determine whether it is a safe and durable procedure. A literature search was performed to identify all papers relevant to laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. In total, 1415 patients underwent attempted repair (mean age 65.7 y) of which 94% underwent an antireflux procedure. There were 70 (5.3%) episodes of operative morbidity and 173 (12.7%) patients experienced postoperative complications. In 10 studies, radiologic follow-up was offered after a mean of 16.5 months. Of those undergoing contrast swallow 26.9% had evidence of anatomic recurrence. In conclusion, recurrence rates after laparoscopic repair seem to be high compared with earlier studies of open repair. The long-term consequences of anatomic recurrence are currently uncertain.

Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair

Paraesophageal hernias are difficult surgical problems that often need repair. Meticulous work-up and surgical technique are required for optimal results. A laparoscopic approach is associated with reduced morbidity and, if combined with the use of biologic mesh, provides relief of symptoms and a durable repair.

Wedge gastroplasty and reinforced crural repair: Important components of laparoscopic giant or recurrent hiatal hernia repair

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic repair of a giant hiatal hernia (>50% of the stomach above the diaphragm) is associated with short-term recurrence rates of 12% to 42%. Recurrent hiatal hernias often have significantly altered anatomy, making laparoscopic repair challenging. We hypothesized that increasing intra-abdominal esophageal length by means of Collis wedge gastroplasty, complete fat-pad dissection, hernia-sac excision, and primary reinforced crural repair would minimize short-term recurrence and provide adequate symptomatic relief.

METHODS

From January 1, 2001, though May 1, 2005, 61 patients underwent laparoscopic repair of a giant or recurrent hiatal hernia with a Collis wedge gastroplasty and Nissen fundoplication. Symptomatic outcomes were assessed with a validated questionnaire (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life). We obtained postoperative radiographic imaging to objectively assess anatomic results at a median of 1.13 years.

RESULTS

Of the 61 patients, 12 (20%) were referred to our institution after previous repairs. Operating time averaged 308 +/- 103 minutes. The median hospital stay was 4 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 5 (8.2%) patients. One (1.6%) patient died of cardiac complications. Postoperatively, 52 (85%) patients completed the questionnaire with mean a Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire score of 1.15 +/- 2.78 (scale, 0-45; 0 = asymptomatic). Overall, 51 (98%) of the 52 respondents were satisfied with their surgical outcome. Postoperative radiographic data were available for 54 (89%) patients. We identified no recurrences at 1-month follow-up, and only 4.7% (2/42) had evidence of radiographic recurrence at 1 year or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent use of a Collis wedge gastroplasty with reinforced crural repair minimizes short-term recurrence after minimally invasive giant hiatal hernia repair. Symptomatic results are excellent in most patients.