Dose-Related Efficacy of Aspirin After Coronary Surgery in Patients With PlA2 Polymorphism (NCT00262275)

The emergent phenomenon of aspirin resistance: insights from genetic association studies

Despite the clinical benefits of aspirin, the interindividual variation in response to this antiplatelet drug is considerable. The manifestation of aspirin resistance (AR) is frequently observed, although this complex process remains poorly understood. While AR etiology is likely to be multifactorial, genetic factors appear to be preponderant. According to several genetic association studies, both genome-wide and candidate gene studies, numerous SNPs in cyclooxygenase, thromboxane and platelet receptors-related genes have been identified as capable of negatively affecting aspirin action. Thus, it is essential to understand the clinical relevance of AR-related SNPs as potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers as they may be essential to defining the AR phenotype.

The Prognostic Value of Combinations of Genetic Polymorphisms in the ITGB3, ITGA2, and CYP2C19*2 Genes in Predicting Cardiovascular Outcomes After Coronary Bypass Grafting

AIM

To determine if there are any associations between the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): rs2046934, rs1126643, rs5918, rs6065, rs4244285; rs4986893 and the occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVE) in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 130 CABG patients with stable angina grades II-IV. After CABG 69 of the patients were treated with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone, and 61 received dual antiplatelet therapy (ASA+clopidogrel). Platelet function was assessed by light transmission aggregometry with adenosinediphosphate and arachidonic acid. The SNPs were identified by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with electrophoretic detection. The mean follow-up period was equal to 10.9 ± 5.2 months. The primary end point included the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemic stroke.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period 12 CVE were registered: 3 deaths, 6 MI, 3 strokes. Patients with composite mutant alleles of ITGB3+CYP2C19*2 or CYP2C19*2 + ITGA2, and with the mutant allele (*2) of CYP2C19, met end points more often than patients with other gene combinations (wild-type homozygotes, presence of one mutant allele of ITGB3 or ITGA2, the composite of mutant alleles of ITGB3+ITGA2 or ITGB3+ITGA2+CYP2C19*2; hazard ratio = 4, 95% confidence interval: 2.19-7.29, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Carriage of a combination of mutant alleles in multiple genes including ITGB3+CYP2C19*2 or CYP2C19*2 + ITGA2 or CYP2C19*2 are possible predictors of CVE in patients after CABG.

The pharmacogenetic control of antiplatelet response: candidate genes and CYP2C19

INTRODUCTION

Aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor are antiplatelet agents for the prevention of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and other indications. Variability in response is observed to different degrees with these agents, which can translate to increased risks for adverse cardiovascular events. As such, potential pharmacogenetic determinants of antiplatelet pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical outcomes have been actively studied.

AREAS COVERED

This article provides an overview of the available antiplatelet pharmacogenetics literature. Evidence supporting the significance of candidate genes and their potential influence on antiplatelet response and clinical outcomes are summarized and evaluated. Additional focus is directed at CYP2C19 and clopidogrel response, including the availability of clinical testing and genotype-directed antiplatelet therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The reported aspirin response candidate genes have not been adequately replicated and few candidate genes have thus far been implicated in prasugrel or ticagrelor response. However, abundant data support the clinical validity of CYP2C19 and clopidogrel response variability among ACS/PCI patients. Although limited prospective trial data are available to support the utility of routine CYP2C19 testing, the increased risks for reduced clopidogrel efficacy among ACS/PCI patients that carry CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles should be considered when genotype results are available.

The PlA1/A2 polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa in relation to efficacy of antiplatelet drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The PlA1/A2 polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa) has been associated with both antiplatelet drug resistance and increased cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to conduct the first meta-analysis investigating the association between carriage of the PlA2 allele and resistance to currently licensed antiplatelet drugs.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched for all articles evaluating genetic polymorphisms of GPIIIa. For studies where antiplatelet resistance was measured using validated techniques, pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using fixed effects and random effects models.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were eligible for statistical analysis and included 1650 PlA1 homozygous subjects and 668 carriers of the PlA2 allele. For carriers of the PlA2 allele, OR 0.924 (n = 2318; 95% CI 0.743, 1.151; P = 0.481) was observed for resistance to any antiplatelet drug, OR 0.862 (n = 2085; 95% CI 0.685, 1.086; P = 0.208) for resistance to aspirin and OR 1.429 (n = 233; 95% CI 0.791, 2.582; P = 0.237) for resistance to clopidogrel. In the aspirin cohort, sub-group analysis revealed no statistical association in either healthy subjects or those with cardiovascular disease. PlA2 carriage was marginally associated with aspirin sensitivity using the fixed effects model when identified by the PFA-100 assay (n = 1151; OR 0.743, 95% CI 0.558, 0.989; P = 0.041) but with significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 55%; P = 0.002). Significance was lost with analysis using a random effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

The totality of published data does not support an association between carriage of the PlA2 allele and antiplatelet drug resistance. Significant heterogeneity indicates the need for larger studies using validated and standardized assays.

Platelet-reactivity tests identify patients at risk of secondary cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is the standard treatment for the prevention of cardiovascular events (CVEs). High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is a risk factor for secondary CVEs in patients prescribed aspirin and/or clopidogrel. The present review and meta-analysis was aimed at assessing the ability of individual platelet-function tests to reliably identify patients at risk of developing secondary CVEs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies on platelet-reactivity measurements and CVEs. The main inclusion criteria were: (i) prospective study design; (ii) study medication, including aspirin and/or clopidogrel; and (iii) a platelet-function test being performed at baseline, before follow-up started. Of 3882 identified studies, 102 (2.6%; reporting on 44 098 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. With regard to high on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR), 22 different tests were discussed in 55 studies (22 441 patients). Pooled analysis showed that HAPR was diagnosed in 22.2% of patients, and was associated with an increased CVE risk (relative risk [RR] 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.77-2.47). Eleven HAPR tests independently showed a significantly increased CVE risk in patients with HAPR as compared with those with normal on-aspirin platelet reactivity. As regards high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HCPR), 59 studies (34 776 patients) discussed 15 different tests, and reported that HCPR was present in 40.4% of patients and was associated with an increased CVE risk (RR 2.80; 95% CI 2.40-3.27). Ten tests showed a significantly increased CVE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HPR are suboptimally protected against future cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, not all of the numerous platelet tests proved to be able to identify patients at increased cardiovascular risk.

ASPIRIN RESISTANCE CANDIDATE GENES AND THEIR ASSOCIATION WITH THE RISK OF CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS

The review presents the current literature evidence on the most likely genetic polymorphisms of aspirin resistance, such as polymorphisms of cyclooxygenase, glycoproteins GP Ib/IIIa, GP Ibα, GP VI, and adenosine diphosphate receptors P2Y1 and P2Y12. The authors discuss the prevalence of these polymorphisms in laboratory and clinical aspirin resistance, as well as their association with the risk of cardiovascular events during aspirin treatment. 

Antiplatelet drug therapy: role of pharmacodynamic and genetic testing

Antiplatelet therapy represents the cornerstone of treatment for the short- and long-term prevention of atherothrombotic disease processes, in particular in high-risk settings such as in patients with acute coronary syndrome and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Currently, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel represents the most commonly used treatment regimen in these settings. However, a considerable number of patients continue to experience adverse outcomes, including both bleeding and recurrent ischemic events. Numerous investigations have demonstrated that this phenomenon may be, in part, attributed to the broad variability in individual response profiles to this standard antiplatelet treatment regimen, as identified by various assays of platelet function testing. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that genetic polymorphisms may also have an important role in determining levels of platelet inhibition and may be considered as a tool to identify patients at risk of adverse events. This article provides an overview on antiplatelet drug response variability, an update on definitions, including the role of pharmacodynamic testing, underlying mechanisms – with emphasis on recent understandings on pharmacogenetics and drug–drug interactions – and current and future perspectives on individualized antiplatelet therapy.

Pharmacogenetics in cardiovascular antithrombotic therapy

Thrombosis is the most important underlying mechanism of coronary artery disease and embolic stroke. Hence, antithrombotic therapy is widely used in these scenarios. However, not all patients achieve the same degree of benefit from antithrombotic agents, and a considerable number of treated patients will continue to experience a new thrombotic event. Such lack of clinical benefit may be related to a wide variability of responses to antithrombotic treatment among individuals (i.e., interindividual heterogeneity). Several factors have been identified in this interindividual heterogeneity in response to antithrombotic treatment. Pharmacogenetics has emerged as a field that identifies specific gene variants able to explain the variability in patient response to a given drug. Polymorphisms affecting the disposition, metabolism, transporters, or targets of a drug all can be implicated in the modification of an individual's antithrombotic drug response and therefore the safety and efficacy of the aforementioned drug. The present paper reviews the modulating role of different polymorphisms on individuals' responses to antithrombotic drugs commonly used in clinical practice.

Postoperative development of aspirin resistance following coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND

Aspirin therapy is known to substantially reduce mortality and the rate of ischaemic complications after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Rates of perioperative aspirin resistance cited in the literature are up to 50% and could be influenced by extracorporeal circulation. Thus, aspirin resistance after CABG may have a significant clinical relevance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 59 patients undergoing CABG (on-pump, off-pump and combined procedures) aspirin resistance was investigated by arachidonic acid induced platelet aggregometry. Clinical relevance was assessed with 12-month follow up.

RESULTS

Two types of resistance were observed: A preoperative resistance (despite oral aspirin or in vitro addition) was present in 29% and a postoperative developing type was seen in 49% resulting in only 22% of patients with a 'normal' reaction to aspirin. If patients were already on oral aspirin at admission, the rate of resistance was significantly reduced. Off-pump surgery or pump-times exceeding 120 min had no significant impact on resistance. During the 12-month follow up (98.3%), there were three deaths (one stroke, one intestinal ischaemia, one mediastinitis after postoperative delirium) in patients with the perioperative resistance and none in other patients (P = 0.345). In none of those patients who presented with perioperative aspirin resistance, could this aspirin resistance be demonstrated when tested again after 12 months?

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin resistance is a transient phenomenon present in the majority of patients undergoing CABG. The three deaths in the resistant group may - although not statistically significant - indicate the possibility of a worse outcome for patients with aspirin resistance.

Pharmacogenetics of aspirin resistance: a comprehensive systematic review

AIMS

The aim was to perform a systematic review of all candidate gene association studies in aspirin resistance.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched up until 1 December 2007 for all studies investigating any candidate gene for aspirin resistance in humans. Aspirin resistance was required to have been measured by a standardized laboratory technique to be included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Within 31 studies, 50 polymorphisms in 11 genes were investigated in 2834 subjects. The PlA1/A2 polymorphism in the GPIIIa platelet receptor was the most frequently investigated, with 19 studies in 1389 subjects. The PlA1/A2 variant was significantly associated with aspirin resistance when measured in healthy subjects [odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24, 4.49; P = 0.009]. Combining genetic data from all studies (comprising both healthy subjects and those with cardiovascular disease) reduced the observed effect size (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.84, 1.54; P = 0.40). Moreover, the observed effect of PlA1/A2 genotype varied depending on the methodology used for determining aspirin sensitivity/resistance. No significant association was found with aspirin resistance in four other investigated polymorphisms in the COX-1, GPla, P2Y1 or P2Y12 genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support a genetic association between the PlA1/A2 molecular variant and aspirin resistance in healthy subjects, with the effect diminishing in the presence of cardiovascular disease. The laboratory methodology used influences the detection of aspirin resistance. However, as heterogeneity was significant and our results are based on a limited number of studies, further studies are required to confirm our findings.