Transhiatal esophagectomy in the profoundly obese: implications and experience

Post-Esophagectomy Dumping Syndrome: Assessing Quality of Life of Long-Term Survivors

Background/Objectives: Survival rates for esophageal cancer patients have markedly improved. Inevitably, attention has been drawn to functional and quality-of-life problems. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of dumping syndrome in patients following esophageal resection and its correlation with postoperative quality of life. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved disease-free patients who underwent a potentially curative resection for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma between January 2019 and January 2024 in a single academic institution. Patients were asked to fill in two questionnaires: the Dumping Syndrome Rating Scale (DSRS) and the QLQ-OG25. A Composite Dumping Syndrome Index (CDSI) was calculated by adding the summary severity and frequency scores for each patient. Results: During the study period, 42 patients underwent esophagectomy for malignant esophageal or junctional tumors. In total, 14 eligible patients responded to the questionnaires at a mean time of 19.7 (±20.8) months following their operation. Three patients (21%) reported having at least quite severe problems related to at least two dumping symptoms. Six patients (43%) reported that they avoid certain foods in order to alleviate related problems. A high CDSI score was associated with significantly increased OG25 scores for dysphagia, eating restriction, odynophagia, pain and discomfort, and reflux (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Early dumping syndrome can occur in a significant proportion of patients following esophagectomy and may adversely affect quality of life.

Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence Model in Recognizing Recurrent Laryngeal Nerves During Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy is a common complication in esophagectomy and its main risk factor is reportedly intraoperative procedure associated with surgeons' experience. We aimed to improve surgeons' recognition of the RLN during robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) by developing an artificial intelligence (AI) model.

METHODS

We used 120 RAMIE videos from four institutions to develop an AI model and eight other surgical videos from another institution for AI model evaluation. AI performance was measured using the Intersection over Union (IoU). Furthermore, to verify the AI's clinical validity, we conducted the two experiments on the early identification of RLN and recognition of its location by eight trainee surgeons with or without AI.

RESULTS

The IoUs for AI recognition of the right and left RLNs were 0.40 ± 0.26 and 0.34 ± 0.27, respectively. The recognition of the right RLN presence in the beginning of right RLN lymph node dissection (LND) by surgeons with AI (81.3%) was significantly more accurate (p = 0.004) than that by surgeons without AI (46.9%). The IoU of right RLN during right RLN LND recognized by surgeons with AI (0.59 ± 0.18) was significantly higher (p = 0.010) than that by surgeons without AI (0.40 ± 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons' recognition of anatomical structures in RAMIE was improved by our AI system with high accuracy. Especially in right RLN LND, surgeons could recognize the RLN more quickly and accurately by using the AI model.

Predictive value of postoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy

Introduction

Among the many possible postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most common and serious. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the ability of various inflammatory and nutritional markers to predict postoperative AL in patients after esophagectomy.

Methods

A total of 273 patients were retrospectively evaluated and enrolled into this study. Perioperative, surgery-related, tumor-related and laboratory tests data were extracted and analyzed. The discriminatory ability and optimal cut-off value was evaluated according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to access the potential risk factors for AL.

Results

The overall incidence of AL was 12.5% (34/273). C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CRP/ALB ratio) [AUC 0.943 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.911–0.976, p <  0.001)] and operation time [AUC 0.747 (95% CI = 0.679–0.815, p <  0.001)] had the greatest discrimination on AL prediction. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CRP/ALB ratio and operation time were two independent risk factors for AL, and CRP/ALB ratio (OR = 102.909, p <  0.001) had an advantage over operation time (OR = 9.363, p = 0.020; Table 3).

Conclusion

Operation time and postoperative CRP/ALB ratio were two independent predictive indexes for AL. Postoperative CRP/ALB ratio greater than 3.00 indicated a high risk of AL. For patients with abnormal postoperative CRP/ALB ratio, early non-operative treatment or surgical intervention are needed to reduce the serious sequelae of AL.

Preoperative computed tomography predicts the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position

BACKGROUND

Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) after thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (EC) is known to be a major complication leading to poor quality of life. RLNP is mainly associated with surgical procedures performed near the RLN. Therefore, with focus on the region of the RLN, we used preoperative computed tomography to investigate the risk factors of RLNP in patients with EC undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 77 EC patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position at our department between January 2010 and December 2018. Bilateral cross-sectional areas (mm²) of the fatty tissue around the RLN at the level of the lower pole of the thyroid gland were measured on preoperative axial computed tomography (CT) images. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the incidence of RLNP and patient clinical factors, including the cross-sectional areas.

RESULTS

RLNP occurred in 24 of 77 patients (31.2%). The incidence of RLNP was significantly more frequent on the left side than on the right. (26% vs. 5.2%, respectively). Univariate analysis identified the following left RLNP risk factors: intrathoracic operative time (> 235 min), and area around the RLN (> 174.3 mm²). Multivariate analysis found that the area around the RLN was an independent risk factor of left RLNP.

CONCLUSION

An increased area around the RLN measured on an axial CT view at the level of the lower pole of the thyroid gland was a risk factor of RLNP in EC patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Size of recurrent laryngeal nerve as a new risk factor for postoperative vocal cord paralysis

Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) is a frequent and serious complication following esophageal cancer surgery. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the correlation between recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) size and RLNP. This was a retrospective study of esophageal cancer patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy from January 2012 to December 2014. Eighty-four patients were included in the primary analysis. Diameter of the RLN was measured using the digital video recording of surgical procedures by the ratio between scissor and RLN. For evaluation of vocal cord paralysis or paresis, indirect laryngoscopy was performed. Because RLNP more frequently occurs on the left side than the right, we evaluated the correlation between size of the left RLN and left RLNP. The median size of the left RLN was 1.51 mm. We found that the incidence of postoperative left RLNP (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥1) was significantly higher (71% vs. 24%; P < 0.001) in thin RLNs (≤1.5 mm) than in thick RLNs (>1.5 mm). Thin RLN (P < 0.001), female sex (P = 0.025), and being overweight (P = 0.034) were identified as significant independent risk factors for postoperative RLNP. RLNP more easily occurred when the RLN was thin. It is difficult to confirm occurrence of postoperative RLNP before and at extubation. Therefore, it is helpful to know its risk factors including size of RLN.

The impact of obesity on esophagectomy: a meta-analysis

The impact of body mass index (BMI) on postoperative outcomes after curative resection for esophageal cancer has been assessed in many studies worldwide with conflicting conclusions. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the influence of preoperative BMI on surgical and oncologic outcomes after radical surgery for esophageal cancer, in Western studies. A comprehensive electronic search was performed to identify Western publications reporting BMI and outcomes following surgery for esophageal cancer. Articles that did not report preoperative BMI, postoperative morbidity, and early mortality were excluded. Statistical analysis was performed using the OpenMetaAnalyst software (Version 10.10). One hundred and ninety records were examined and 8 studies were included with a total of 2838 patients. The study population was stratified into two groups: a nonobese group (BMI < 30 kg/m2), containing 2199 patients, and an obese group (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2), with 639 patients. In the obese group, there was an increased risk (up to 35%) of anastomotic leak (P = 0.003; RR: 0.857, 95% CI: 0.497, 0.867). The obese group showed a significantly more favorable five-year overall survival (P = 0.011). Although there was a significant association between anastomotic leak and obesity, patients with obesity also have a better overall 5-year survival. This meta-analysis demonstrates that patients with obesity should be counseled regarding the specific risks of surgery but they can be reassured that despite these risks overall outcome is satisfactory.

Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center

The impact of body weight on outcomes after robotic-assisted esophageal surgery for cancer has not been studied. We examined the short-term operative outcomes in patients according to their body mass index following robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy at a high-volume tertiary-care referral cancer center and evaluated the safety of robotic surgery in patients with an elevated body mass index. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy between April 2010 and June 2013 for pathologically confirmed distal esophageal cancer was conducted. Patient demographics, clinicopathologic data, and operative outcomes were collected. We stratified body mass index at admission for surgery according to World Health Organization criteria; normal range is defined as a body mass index range of 18.5-24.9 kg/m2. Overweight is defined as a body mass index range of 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 and obesity is defined as a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 and above. Statistics were calculated using Pearson's Chi-square and Pearson's correlation coefficient tests with a P-value of 0.05 or less for significance. One hundred and twenty-nine patients (103 men, 26 women) with median age of 67 (30-84) years were included. The majority of patients, 76% (N = 98) received neoadjuvant therapy. When stratified by body mass index, 28 (22%) were normal weight, 56 (43%) were overweight, and 45 (35%) were obese. All patients had R0 resection. Median operating room time was 407 (239-694) minutes. When stratified by body mass index, medians of operating room time across the normal weight, overweight and obese groups were 387 (254-660) minutes, 395 (310-645) minutes and 445 (239-694), respectively. Median estimated blood loss (EBL) was 150 (25-600) cc. When stratified by body mass index, medians of EBL across the normal weight, overweight and obese groups were 100 (50-500) cc, 150 (25-600) cc and 150 (25-600), respectively. Obesity significantly correlated with longer operating room time (P = 0.05) but without significant increased EBL (P = 0.348). Among the three body mass index groups there was no difference in postoperative complications including thrombotic events (pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis) (P = 0.266), pneumonia (P = 0.189), anastomotic leak (P = 0.090), wound infection (P = 0.390), any cardiac events (P = 0.793) or 30 days mortality (P = 0.414). Our data study demonstrates that patients with esophageal cancer and an elevated body mass index undergoing robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy have increased operative times but no significantly increased EBL during the procedure. Other potential morbidities did not differ with the robotic approach.

A high body mass index in esophageal cancer patients is not associated with adverse outcomes following esophagectomy

PURPOSE

There is no consensus about the impact of a high BMI on postoperative morbidity and survival after esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of a high BMI on postoperative complications and survival in a large cohort of esophageal cancer patients.

METHODS

From January 2006 to December 2012, 1,342 consecutive esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy were included in this study. Patients were divided into three groups: 950 patients were classified as normal BMI (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2)), 279 were classified as high BMI (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2)), and 113 as low BMI (BMI < 18.5 kg/m(2)). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify confounding factors associated with postoperative complications. The impact of BMI on overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

The predominance of pathological type was esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1,280, 95.4 %). Overall morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay did not differ among groups. The incidence of pneumonia was higher in patients with high BMI compared with those with normal BMI (14.7 vs. 9.9 %, P = 0.025). However, chylothorax was less frequent in high-BMI group (0.4 % in high-BMI group, 3.1 % in normal group, and 3.5 % in low group, P = 0.011). Logistic regression analysis revealed high BMI was independently associated with decreased incidence of chylothorax [HR 0.86; 95 % confidence interval 0.76-0.97]. Overweight and obese patients had significantly better overall survival than underweight patients (median OS 55.6 vs. 32.5 months, P = 0.013), while the pathological stage was significantly higher in underweight patients (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, T status, N status, differentiation grade, and tumor length were identified as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

A high BMI is not associated with increased overall morbidity following esophagectomy; moreover, it is associated with decreased incidence of chylothorax. The better overall survival in patients with high BMI compared with those with low BMI might be due to a relatively low pathological stage. A high BMI should therefore not be a relative contraindication for esophagectomy.

Impact of body mass index on surgical outcomes after esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with overweight reportedly have more comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease, and longer operating times as well as more blood loss during surgery compared with those with normal weight. However, the impact of overweight on the short-term outcome after transthoracic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. We hypothesized that overweight has a negative impact on short-term surgical outcomes after esophagectomy for patients with ESCC.

METHODS

A total of 304 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy for ESCC were included in this study. Body mass index (BMI) was classified into three categories, <18.49, 18.50-24.99, and >25.00 (kg/m(2)), defined as low, normal, and high BMI, respectively, according to the World Health Organization criteria. We investigated the association of BMI status with patient demographics and surgical outcomes after esophagectomy for patients with ESCC. In addition, overall survival and relapse-free survival stratified by BMI were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine (19.4 %) and 41 (13.4 %) patients were classified to low BMI and high BMI, respectively. The high-BMI group had significantly higher comorbidity rates of diabetes mellitus (p < 0.01) and anastomotic leakage (p = 0.011) than the normal-BMI group. There were no significant association between high BMI and another various complications except for an anastomotic leakage, severe complications defined by Clavien-Dindo classification and in-hospital mortality. In multivariate analysis, high BMI was a significant risk factor for anastomotic leakage (p = 0.030, hazard ratio; 3.423, 95%CI; 1.128-10.38). On the other hand, no significant association was observed between low BMI and short surgical outcomes. There were no significant differences in overall and relapse-free survival among the three BMI groups in univariate and multivariate analysis (p = 0.128 and p = 0.584, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The surgical treatment should not be denied for patients with ESCC due to overweight and underweight. However, intraoperative prevention and postoperative careful monitoring for anastomotic leakage might be required after esophagectomy for overweight patients with ESCC.

The impact of body mass index on complication and survival in resected oesophageal cancer: a clinical-based cohort and meta-analysis

Background:

Body mass index (BMI) has been associated with the risk of oesophageal cancer. But the influence of BMI on postoperative complication and prognosis has always been controversial.

Methods:

In total, 2031 consecutive patients who underwent oesophagectomy between 1998 and 2008 were classified according to Asian-specific BMI (kg m⁻²) cutoff values. The impact of BMI on overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models. We performed a meta-analysis to examine the association of BMI with OS and postoperative complication.

Results:

Patients with higher BMI had more postoperative complication (P=0.002), such as anastomotic leakage (P=0.016) and cardiovascular diseases (P<0.001), but less incidence of chylous leakage (P=0.010). Logistic regression analysis showed that BMI (P=0.005) was a confounding factor associated with postoperative complication. Multivariate analysis showed that overweight and obese patients had a more favourable survival than normal weight patients (HR (hazard ratio) = 0.80, 95% CI (confidence interval): 0.70–0.92, P=0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that the association with higher BMI and increased OS was observed in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) (P<0.001), oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) (P=0.034), never-smoking (P=0.035), ever-smoking (P=0.035), never alcohol consumption (P=0.005), weight loss (P=0.003) and advanced pathological stage (P<0.001). The meta-analysis further corroborated that higher BMI was associated with increased complication of anastomotic leakage (RR (risk ratio)=1.04, 95% CI: 1.02–1.06, P=0.001), wound infection (RR=1.03, 95% CI: 1.00–1.05, P=0.031) and cardiovascular diseases (RR=1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.05, P=0.039), but decreased incidence of chylous leakage (RR=0.98, 95% CI: 0.96–0.99, P<0.001). In addition, high BMI could significantly improved OS (HR=0.78, 95% CI: 0.71–0.85, P<0.001).

Conclusion:

Preoperative BMI was an independent prognostic factor for survival, and strongly associated with postoperative complications in oesophageal cancer.

The impact of body mass index on esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgeons are increasingly operating on patients who are overweight or obese. The influence of obesity on surgical and oncologic outcomes has only recently been addressed. We focus this review on obesity and its impact on esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Recent literature and our own institutional experience were reviewed to determine the impact of body mass index on the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer.

RESULTS

With few exceptions, no significant differences were seen in perioperative outcomes or survival in patients treated for esophageal cancer when stratified by body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Although obesity poses increased operative challenges to the surgeon, surgical and oncologic outcomes remain unchanged in obese patients compared with patients who are not obese.

Body mass index and perioperative complications after oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma: a systematic database review

OBJECTIVE

Given the increasing rate of obesity, the effects of excessive body weight on surgical outcomes constitute a relevant quality of care concern. Our aim was to determine the relationship between preoperative body mass index (BMI) on perioperative complications after oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

DESIGN

Retrospective database review.

SETTING

Single institution high volume oncological tertiary care referral centre.

PARTICIPANTS

From our comprehensive oesophageal cancer database consisting of 709 patients, we stratified patients according to BMI: 155 normal-weight (BMI 20-24), 198 overweight (BMI 25-29) and 187 obese (BMI ≥30) patients.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent oesophagectomy for cancer.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidences of preoperative risk factors and perioperative complications in each group were analysed.

RESULTS

The patient cohort consisted of 474 men and 66 women with a mean age of 64.3 years (28-86). They were similar in terms of demographics and comorbidities, with the exception of a younger age (65.2 vs 65.4 vs 62.5 years, p=0.0094), and a higher incidence of diabetes (9.1% vs 13.2% vs 22.7%, p=0.001), hiatal hernia (16.8% vs 17.8% vs 28.8%, p=0.009) and Barrett oesophagus (24.7% vs 25.4% vs 36.2%, p=0.025) for obese patients. The type of surgery performed, overall blood loss, extent of lymphadenectomy, R0 resections and complications were not influenced by BMI on univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, patients with an elevated BMI and oesophageal adenocarcinoma do not experience an increase in morbidity and mortality after oesophagectomy as stated in previous reports, when performed at a high volume centre. Additionally, BMI did not affect the quality of oncological resection as determined by number of harvested lymph-nodes and rates of R0 resections.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

MCC 15030, IRB 105286.

Does obesity affect outcomes in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of esophageal carcinoma and the global prevalence of obesity are both increasing. As a result, there is an increased number of esophagectomies being performed on obese patients. The identification of specific complications in obese patients undergoing esophagectomy may allow improved risk assessment and postoperative management to reduce morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether obese patients are at increased risk of postoperative complications, mortality, and compromised survival compared to non-obese patients following esophageal resection.

METHODS

A Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane database search was performed on all articles between January 1980 and January 2012 comparing post-esophagectomy outcomes between obese and non-obese patients. This study was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between obese and non-obese patients with respect to extent of tumor resection, cardiorespiratory complications, anastomotic leakage, reoperation rates, wound infection, or postoperative mortality. Meta-regression analysis showed that diabetes in obese patients was associated with a significant impact on the risk of anastomotic leakage (coefficient = -7.94 [-15.24-0.65, P = 0.03) and atrial fibrillation (coefficient = -6.94 [-12.79-1.10], P = 0.02). Overall, obese patients had significantly better long-term survival than non-obese patients (Hazard Ratio = 0.78 [0.64-0.96], P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who are eligible for surgery, obesity alone does not increase risk of postoperative complications or mortality and should not be an independent contraindication for esophagectomy. However, the presence of diabetes mellitus in conjunction with obesity may be associated with increased risk of anastomotic leakage and atrial fibrillation. Because of the adverse physiological remodeling in obesity, surgeons should maintain a low threshold for the investigation and management of complications and ensure meticulous management of co-morbidities. Obesity may also improve long-term postoperative survival after esophageal surgery, although further studies with higher levels of evidence are necessary to fully determine any advantageous effects of obesity following oncological esophageal surgery.

A high body mass index in esophageal cancer patients does not influence postoperative outcome or long-term survival

Background

The body mass index (BMI) in the general population has increased over the past decades. A high BMI is a known risk factor for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Several studies on the influence of a high BMI on the postoperative course and survival after esophagectomy have shown contradictory results. The aim of the present study was to determine the influence of a high BMI on postoperative complications and survival among a large cohort of esophageal cancer patients.

Methods

Patients who underwent an esophagectomy between 1993 and 2010 were divided into three groups according to their BMI: normal weight (<25 kg/m²), overweight (25–30 kg/m²) or obese (≥30 kg/m²). Severity of complications was scored according to the Dindo classification, which was divided into three categories: no complications, minor to moderate complications, and severe complications. Long-term survival was determined according to the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

A total of 736 esophagectomy patients were divided into three groups: normal weight (n = 352), overweight (n = 308), and obese (n = 72). Complications rates were similar for all groups (65–72%, P = 0.241). The incidence of anastomotic leakage was higher among obese patients compared to the other groups (20% vs. 10–12% respectively, P = 0.019), but there was no significant difference between the three groups regarding the severity of complications according to the Dindo classification (P = 0.660) or in 5-year survival rates (P = 0.517).

Conclusions

A high BMI is not associated with an increased incidence or severity of complications after esophagectomy; however, anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in obese patients. Five-year survival rates were not influenced by the preoperative BMI. A high BMI is therefore ought not be an exclusion criterion for esophagectomy.

Excess body weight and obesity--the link with gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary cancer

Excess body weight (EBW) is an independent risk factor for many human malignancies, including cancers throughout the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary tract from the esophagus to the colorectum. The relative risk of gastrointestinal cancer in obese individuals is approximately 1.5-2.0 times that for normal weight individuals, with organ-specific and gender-specific differences for specific cancers. The association between EBW and risk of premalignant stages of gastrointestinal carcinogenesis, such as colorectal adenoma and Barrett esophagus, is similar, implying a role for EBW during the early stages of carcinogenesis that could be relevant to preventative strategies. EBW also impacts negatively on gastrointestinal cancer outcomes. The mechanistic basis of the association between EBW and carcinogenesis remains incompletely understood. Postulated mechanisms include increased insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling and chronic inflammation (both linked to the metabolic syndrome), as well as signaling via adipokines, such as leptin. The role of obesity-related changes in the intestinal microbiome in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis deserves further attention. Whether weight loss leads to reduced future gastrointestinal and liver cancer risk has yet to be fully explored. There is some support for the idea that weight loss negatively regulates colorectal carcinogenesis. In addition, data suggest a reduction in risk of several cancers in the first 10 years after bariatric surgery.

Prognostic value of body mass index on short-term and long-term outcome after resection of esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Cachexia and obesity have been suggested to be risk factors for postoperative complications. However, high body mass index (BMI) might result in a higher R0-resection rate because of the presence of more fatty tissue surrounding the tumor. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether BMI is of prognostic value with regard to short-term and long-term outcome in patients who undergo esophagectomy for cancer.

METHODS

In 556 patients who underwent esophagectomy (1991-2007), clinical and pathological outcome were compared between different BMI classes (underweight, normal weight, overweight, obesity).

RESULTS

Overall morbidity, mortality, and reoperation rate did not differ in underweight and obese patients. However, severe complications seemed to occur more often in obese patients (p = 0.06), and the risk for anastomotic leakage increased with higher BMI (12.5% in underweight patients compared with 27.6% in obese patients, p = 0.04). Histopathological assessment showed comparable pTNM stages, although an advanced pT stage was seen more often in patients with low/normal BMI (p = 0.02). A linear association between BMI and R0-resection rate was detected (p = 0.02): 60% in underweight patients compared with 81% in obese patients. However, unlike pT-stage (p < 0.001), BMI was not an independent predictor for R0 resection (p = 0.12). There was no significant difference in overall or disease-free 5-year survival between the BMI classes (p = 0.25 and p = 0.6, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

BMI is not of prognostic value with regard to short-term and long-term outcome in patients who undergo esophagectomy for cancer and is not an independent predictor for radical R0 resection. Patients oncologically eligible for esophagectomy should not be denied surgery on the basis of their BMI class.

An elevated body mass index does not reduce survival after esophagectomy for cancer

BACKGROUND

Incidences of esophageal cancer and obesity are both rising in the United States. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of elevated body mass index on outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer.

METHODS

Overall and disease-free survivals in obese (BMI ≥ 30), overweight (BMI 25-29), and normal-weight (BMI 20-24) patients undergoing esophagectomy constituted the study end points. Survivals were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences were analyzed by log rank method.

RESULTS

The study included 166 obese, 176 overweight, and 148 normal-weight patients. These three groups were similar in terms of demographics and comorbidities, with the exception of younger age (62.5 vs. 66.2 vs. 65.3 years, P = 0.002), and higher incidence of diabetes (23.5 vs. 11.4 vs. 10.1%, P = 0.001) and hiatal hernia (28.3 vs. 14.8 vs. 20.3%, P = 0.01) in obese patients. Rates of adenocarcinoma histology were higher in obese patients (90.8 vs. 90.9 vs. 82.5%, P = 0.03). Despite similar preoperative stage, obese patients were less likely to receive neoadjuvant treatment (47.6 vs. 54.5 vs. 66.2%, P = 0.004). Response to neoadjuvant treatment, type of surgery performed, extent of lymphadenectomy, rate of R0 resections, perioperative complications, and administration of adjuvant chemotherapy were not influenced by BMI. At a median follow-up of 25 months, 5-year overall and disease-free survivals were longer in obese patients (respectively, 48, 41, 34%, P = 0.01 and 48, 44, 34%, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, an elevated BMI did not reduce overall and disease-free survivals after esophagectomy for cancer.

Preoperative risk assessment and prevention of complications in patients with esophageal cancer

In this review the preoperative risk assessment and prevention of complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer is discussed. Age, pulmonary and cardiovascular condition, nutritional status, and neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy are known predictive factors. None of these factors is a valid exclusion criterion for esophagectomy, but may help in careful patient selection. Both anesthetists and surgeons play an important role in intraoperative risk reduction by means of appropriate fluid management and application of optimal surgical techniques.

Prevalence and outcome of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after esophagectomy in a UK regional cancer network

The aim of this study was to determine the contemporary prevalence, outcome, and survival after esophagogastric anastomotic leakage (EGAL) following esophagectomy by a regional upper gastrointestinal cancer network and to investigate etiological factors. Two hundred forty consecutive patients underwent esophagectomy over a 10-year period (median age 61 [31-79] years, 147 transthoracic and 93 transhiatal esophagectomy, 105 neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 49 chemoradiotherapy). The primary outcome measures were the development of EGAL and survival. Twenty patients developed EGAL (8.3%, 15 managed conservatively, 5 reoperation). Overall operative mortality was 2% (5 patients in total, 1 after EGAL). Median, 1 and 2-year survival was 22 months, 73% and 50%, in patients after EGAL, compared with 31 months, 80% and 56%, in patients who did not suffer EGAL (P= 0.314). On multivariate analysis, low body mass indices (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.79, P= 0.016), individual surgeon (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02-1.43, P= 0.02), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 3.28, 95% CI 1.16-9.22, P= 0.024) were significantly associated with the development of EGAL. EGAL following esophagectomy remained common, but associated mortality was less common than reported in earlier Western series and long-term survival was unaffected.

Multimodality Treatment for Esophageal Malignancy: The Roles of Surgery and Neoadjuvant Therapy

The best curative treatment for esophageal malignancy remains controversial. In 2003, we presented our institution's experience with 124 patients treated from 1990 to 2001. Here we update that experience with an additional 6 years’ data. A total of 221 patients underwent surgical resection from 1990 to 2007; 128 had up-front surgery, 88 underwent surgery after neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy (NARCS), and five underwent surgery after neoadjuvant, single-agent therapy Principle outcomes of interest were 30-day and in-hospital mortality as well 3- and 5-year survival rates. Overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 38 and 33 per cent. NARCS achieved complete pathologic result in 32 per cent of patients with corresponding 3- and 5-year survival rates of 58 and 53 per cent. The 3- and 5-year survival rates for all patients undergoing NARCS were 36 and 31 per cent versus 24 and 18 per cent for patients with up-front surgery for anything over Stage I disease ( P = 0.01). The 3- and 5-year survival rates for patients with up-front resection of Stage I disease were 78 and 70 per cent. Overall, 30-day and in-hospital mortalities were 1.8 and 2.3 per cent. Since January 1, 2000, hospital mortality has been less than 0.8 per cent. We prefer NARCS for malignancy of the esophagus, except in those patients with high-grade dysplasia (carcinoma in situ), suspected Stage I disease, poor performance status, or urgent/emergent circumstances.

Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model

OBJECTIVE

To create a model for perioperative risk of esophagectomy for cancer using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Database.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Database was queried for all patients treated with esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between January 2002 and December 2007. A multivariable risk model for mortality and major morbidity was constructed.

RESULTS

There were 2315 esophagectomies performed by 73 participating centers. Hospital mortality was 63/2315 (2.7%). Major morbidity (defined as reoperation for bleeding [n = 12], anastomotic leak [n = 261], pneumonia [n = 188], reintubation [n = 227], ventilation beyond 48 hours [n = 71], or death [n = 63]) occurred in 553 patients (24%). Preoperative spirometry was obtained in 923/2315 (40%) of patients. A forced expiratory volume in 1 second < 60% of predicted was associated with major morbidity (P = .0044). Important predictors of major morbidity are: age 75 versus 55 (P = .005), black race (P = .08), congestive heart failure (P = .015), coronary artery disease (P = .017), peripheral vascular disease (P = .009), hypertension (P = .029), insulin-dependent diabetes (P = .009), American Society of Anesthesiology rating (P = .001), smoking status (P = .022), and steroid use (P = .026). A strong volume performance relationship was not observed for the composite measure of morbidity and mortality in this patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic surgeons participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Database perform esophagectomy with a low mortality. We identified important predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Volume alone is an inadequate proxy for quality assessment after esophagectomy.

Impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Abnormal body mass index has been targeted as a predictor of complications after major surgery. The aim of this study was to review the impact of obesity on perioperative outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

METHODS

This study was a single-institution retrospective review of patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia or cancer of the esophagus between 1999 and 2004. A body mass index of 30 or greater was considered obese. Patients with a body mass index less than 18.5 were excluded because of the potentially adverse effects of malnutrition on outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 282 eligible patients were identified. There were 84 obese and 198 nonobese patients (mean body mass index = 34.5 versus 25.5; p < 0.0001). Preoperative demographics, comorbidities, and cancer status were similar, except for a higher prevalence of diabetes (p = 0.002), lower prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (p = 0.045), and lower prevalence of stage III disease in the obese group (p = 0.044). Operative time was significantly longer in obese patients (375 versus 301 minutes; p = 0.0001), and estimated blood loss was similar (433 versus 377 mL, obese versus nonobese, respectively). There were 5 (1.8%) overall 30-day perioperative mortalities, with no differences between the groups. Overall major (obese, 23 [27.5%] versus nonobese, 68 [34.3%]) and minor (obese, 23 [27.5%] versus nonobese, 65 [32.8%]) complication rates were also similar. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in any individual complications. There was no difference in median intensive care unit stay (obese, 1 day versus nonobese, 2 days) or overall hospital stay (obese, 7 days versus nonobese, 8 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity was associated with longer operative times. Our review suggests that obesity is not a risk factor for mortality, postoperative complications, or length of hospitalization after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Impact of obesity on perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Obesity has been implicated as a risk factor for perioperative and postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of obesity on morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

STUDY DESIGN

Between January 2000 and July 2007, 262 patients underwent PD at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, of whom 240 had complete data, including body mass index (BMI; calculated as kg/m(2)) for analysis. Data on BMI, preoperative parameters, operative details, and postoperative course were collected. Patients were categorized as obese (BMI >or= 30), overweight (BMI >or= 25 and < 30), or normal weight (BMI < 25). Complications were graded according to previously published scales. Other end points included length of postoperative hospital stay, blood loss, and operative duration. Analyses were performed using univariate and multivariable models.

RESULTS

There were 103 (42.9%) normal-weight, 71 (29.6%) overweight, and 66 (27.5%) obese patients. There were 5 perioperative deaths (2.1%), with no differences across BMI categories. A significant difference in median operative duration and blood loss between obese and normal-weight patients was identified (439 versus 362.5 minutes, p = 0.0004; 650 versus 500 mL, p = 0.0139). In addition, median length of stay was significantly longer for BMI (9.5 versus 8 days, p = 0.095). Although there were no significant differences in superficial wound infections, obese patients did have an increased rate of serious complications compared with normal-weight patients (24.2% versus 13.6%, respectively; p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Obese patients undergoing PD have a substantially increased blood loss and longer operative time but do not have a substantially increased length of postoperative hospital stay or rate of serious complications. These findings should be considered when assessing patients for operation and when counseling patients about operative risk, but they do not preclude obese individuals from undergoing definitive pancreatic operations.

Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned

OBJECTIVE

"Rediscovered" in 1976, transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) has been applicable in most situations requiring esophageal resection and reconstruction. The objective of this study was to review the authors' 30-year experience with THE and changing trends in its use.

METHODS

Using the authors' prospective Esophagectomy Database, this single institution experience with THE was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Two thousand and seven THEs were performed-1063 (previously reported) between 1976 and 1998 (group I) and 944 from 1998 to 2006 (group II), 24% for benign disease, 76%, cancer. THE was possible in 98%. Stomach was the esophageal substitute in 97%. Comparing outcomes between group I and group II, statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) were observed in hospital mortality (4% vs. 1%); adenocarcinoma histology (69% vs. 86%); use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (28% vs. 52%); mean blood loss (677 vs. 368 mL); anastomotic leak (14% vs. 9%); and discharge within 10 days (52% vs. 78%). Major complications remain infrequent: wound infection/dehiscence, 3%, atelectasis/pneumonia, 2%, intrathoracic hemorrhage, recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, chylothorax, and tracheal laceration, <1% each. Late functional results have been good or excellent in 73%. Aggressive preoperative conditioning, avoiding the ICU, improved pain management, and early ambulation reduce length of stay, with 50% in group II discharged within 1 week.

CONCLUSION

THE refinements have reduced the historic morbidity and mortality of esophageal resection. This largest reported THE experience reinforces the value of consistent technique and a clinical pathway in managing these high acuity esophageal patients.