Predictors of Survival and Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Resected N1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Impact of sarcopenia on the prognosis and treatment of lung cancer: an umbrella review

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Sarcopenia, defined as the loss of muscle mass and function, is known to cause adverse health outcomes. The purpose of this umbrella review was to integrate published systematic reviews and meta-analyses exploring sarcopenia and lung cancer to provide comprehensive knowledge on their relationship.

METHODS

Eligible studies were searched from scientific databases until June 28, 2022. Critical appraisal was performed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) 2. The impact of sarcopenia on the pathophysiology, prevalence, and prognosis of lung cancer is summarized at the level of systematic reviews or meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Fourteen reviews and meta-analyses were conducted. The methodological quality was high for one review, low for nine, and critically low for four. The most common standard for diagnosing sarcopenia in the lung cancer population is computed tomography (CT) to measure the skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar vertebra (L3). Sarcopenia was highly prevalent among patients with lung cancer, with a pooled prevalence ranging from 42.8% to 45.0%. The association between sarcopenia and increased postoperative complications and decreased disease control rates with immune checkpoint inhibitors has been demonstrated. Mortality was significantly higher in sarcopenic patients than in non-sarcopenic patients with lung cancer, regardless of the stage of disease or type of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia is a poor prognostic factor for lung cancer. Future studies are necessary to clarify the pathophysiology of sarcopenia and develop effective interventions for sarcopenia in patients with lung cancer.

Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pathologic N1 non-small cell lung cancer is unrecognized: A subgroup analysis of the JBR10 trial

Adjuvant chemotherapy is underutilized in clinical practice, in part, because its anticipated survival benefit is limited. We evaluated the impact of AC on overall and recurrence-free survival among completely resected pN1 NSCLC patients enrolled in the North American Intergroup phase III (JBR10) trial. A post-hoc subgroup analysis of pN1 NSCLC patients was performed. Participants were randomized to cisplatin+vinorelbine (AC) (n = 118) or observation (n = 116) following complete resection. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was recurrence free survival (RFS). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare OS and RFS between the two treatment groups. Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with OS and RFS endpoints. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. AC patients had improved 5-year OS (AC 61.4% vs observation 41.0%, log-rank p = .008) and 5-year RFS (AC 56.2% vs observation 39.9%, log-rank p = .011) rates compared to observation. Cox regression analyses confirmed the OS (HR 0.583, 95% CI 0.402-0.846, p = .005) and RFS (HR 0.573, 95% CI 0.395-0.830, p = .003) benefit associated with AC. AC was associated with a lower risk (HR 0.648, 95% CI 0.435-0.965, p = .0326) and a lower cumulative incidence (Subdistribution Hazard Ratio [SHR], 0.67, 95% CI 0.449-0.999, p = .0498) of lung cancer deaths. In the JBR10 trial, treatment with AC conferred a significant OS and RFS advantage over observation for pN1 NSCLC patients. These data suggest that pN1 NSCLC patients may experience a disproportionately greater clinical benefit from AC than the 6% survival advantage estimated by the LACE meta-analysis.

Prognostic significance of the N1 classification pattern: a meta-analysis of different subclassification methods

OBJECTIVES

The number of positive lymph node stations has been viewed as a subclassification in the N1 category in the new revision of tumour node metastasis (TNM) staging. However, the survival curve of these patients overlapped with that of some patients in the N2 categories. Our study focused on the prognostic significance of different subclassifications for N1 patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library on the topic of N1 lymph node dissection. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the prognostic significance of N1 metastases. I2 statistics was used to evaluate heterogeneity among the studies: If significant heterogeneity existed (P ≤ 0.10; I2 >50%), a random effect model was adopted.

RESULTS

After a careful investigation, a total of 17 articles were included in the analysis. The results showed that patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with multistation N1 disease have worse survival compared with those with single-station N1 disease (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.32-1.77; P < 0.001; I2 = 5.1%). No significant difference was observed between groups when we assessed the number of positive lymph nodes (single or multiple) (HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.96-1.64; P = 0.097; I2 = 72.5%). Patients with positive hilar zone lymph nodes had poorer survival than those limited to the intrapulmonary zone (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.57-2.07; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%). A subgroup analysis conducted according to the different validated lymph node maps showed a stable result.

CONCLUSIONS

Our result confirmed the prognostic significance of the N1 subclassification based on station number. Meanwhile, location-based classifications, especially zone-based, were also identified as prognostically significant, which may need further confirmation and validation in the staged population.

Determination of prognostic factors of surgically treated pathological Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Background

This study aims to identify the prognostic factors in Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer and to investigate whether there was a significant difference in terms of overall survival and diseasefree survival among the subgroups belonging to this disease stage.

Methods

Between January 2010 and December 2018, a total of 144 patients (125 males, 19 females; median age 60 years; range, 41 to 80 years) who were operated for non-small cell lung cancer in our clinic and whose pathological stage was reported as IIIA were retrospectively analyzed. Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, histopathological diagnosis, the standardized uptake value of the mass on positron emission tomography-computed tomography, tumor diameter, type of surgery, lymph node metastasis status, visceral pleural invasion, and overall and disease-free survival rates were recorded.

Results

The median survival was 39 (range, 27.8 to 46.1) months and the five-year overall survival rate was 28%. The mean tumor diameter was 4.3±2.7 cm. The median disease-free survival was 37 (range, 28.1 to 48.6) months and the five-year disease-free survival rate was 26.9%. In the multivariate analysis, overall survival and disease-free survival in T2N2M0 subgroup were significantly worse than the other subgroups. The other poor prognostic factors of survival were the standardized uptake value of the tumor, pneumonectomy, and histopathological subtypes other than squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. Parietal pleural invasion was significantly associated with worse disease-free survival rates.

Conclusion

Our results showed that there may be significant survival differences between subgroups created by tumor histopathology, lymph node invasion and the type of surgery in a heterogeneous lung cancer stage.

Missed Intrapulmonary Lymph Node Metastasis and Survival After Resection of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Pathologic nodal stage is a key prognostic factor for patients with surgically resected lung cancer. We previously described the extent of missed intrapulmonary nodal metastasis in a cohort of patients treated at institutions in metropolitan Memphis, TN. With long-term follow-up, we now quantify the survival impact of missed nodal metastasis.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate inadvertently discarded lymph nodes in re-dissected remnant lung resection specimens from lung cancer patients. Retrieved material was histologically examined and classified as lymph nodes with and without metastasis. Survival information was obtained from hospital cancer registries. We plotted survival distributions with the use of the Kaplan-Meier method and evaluated them with proportional hazards models that controlled for important demographic and clinical factors.

RESULTS

The study included 110 patients who were 54% women and 69% white. Discarded lymph nodes with metastasis were found in 25 patients (23%). Patients with missed lymph node metastasis had an increased risk of death with an unadjusted hazard ratio of 2.0 (p = 0.06) and an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.4 (p = 0.45) compared with patients without missed lymph node metastasis. Patients with more than 2 missed lymph nodes with metastasis had 4.8 times the hazard of death (p = 0.0005) compared with patients without missed lymph node metastasis (adjusted hazard ratio 6.5, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Metastasis to inadvertently discarded intrapulmonary lymph nodes from lung cancer resection specimens was associated with reduced survival. A more rigorous gross dissection protocol for lung cancer resection specimens may provide prognostically useful information.

Incidence, Results, and Our Current Intraoperative Technique to Control Major Vascular Injuries During Minimally Invasive Robotic Thoracic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Our objective is to report our incidence, results, and technique for the control of major vascular injuries during minimally invasive robotic thoracic surgery.

METHODS

This is a consecutive series of patients who underwent a planned robotic thoracic operation by one surgeon.

RESULTS

Between February 2009 and September 2015, 1,304 consecutive patients underwent a robotic operation (lobectomy, n = 502; segmentectomy, n = 130; mediastinal resection, n = 115; Ivor Lewis, n = 103; thymectomy, n = 97; and others, n = 357) by one surgeon. Conversion to thoracotomy occurred in 61 patients (4.7%) and in 14 patients (1.1%) for bleeding (pulmonary artery, n = 13). The incidence of major vascular injury during anatomic pulmonary resection was 2.4% (15 of 632). Of these, 13 patients required thoracotomy performed in a nonurgent manner while the injury was displayed on a monitor, 2 had the vessel repaired minimally invasively, 2 required blood transfusion (0.15%), and 1 patient had 30-day mortality (0.16%). Techniques used to minimize morbidity include having a sponge available during vessel dissection and stapling, applying immediate pressure, delaying the opening until the bleeding is controlled without external pressure, and ensuring there is no bleeding while the chest is opened.

CONCLUSIONS

Major vascular injuries can be safely managed during minimally invasive robotic surgery. Our evolving technique features initial packing of the bleeding for several minutes, maintaining calmness to provide time to prepare for thoracotomy, and reexamination of the injured vessel. If repair is not possible minimally invasively, the vessel is repacked and a nonhurried, elective thoracotomy is performed while the injury is displayed on a monitor to ensure active bleeding is not occurring.

One Hundred Planned Robotic Segmentectomies: Early Results, Technical Details, and Preferred Port Placement

BACKGROUND

Both robotic pulmonary operations and anatomic segmentectomy are being increasingly performed. The largest published series of anatomic robotic segmentectomy comprises 35 patients, and the specific details of port placement are poorly understood.

METHODS

This is a review of a consecutive series of patients from a single surgeon's prospective database. All patients in the study were scheduled to undergo robotic anatomic segmentectomy.

RESULTS

Between February 2010 and December 2014, 100 patients went to the operating room for a planned pulmonary segmentectomy. A robotic approach was chosen for all. Seven patients underwent conversion to robotic lobectomy, and the remaining 93 patients had an anatomic robotic segmentectomy. There were no conversions to thoracotomy. Indications for resection were lung cancer in 79 patients, metastatic lesions in 10 patients, fungal infections in 4 patients, and other conditions in 7 patients. The median age was 69 years, and 50 patients were men. The median blood loss was 20 mL (range, 10-120 mL), the median number of lymph nodes removed was 19, the median operative time was 1.28 hours (88 minutes), the median length of stay was 3 days, and major morbidity occurred in 2 patients (pneumonia in both). All had undergone R0 resection. There were no 30- or 90-day mortalities. Of the 79 patients with lung cancer, the median follow-up was 30 months, and 3 patients (3.4%) had recurrence in the operated lobe. Overall survival was 95% at 30 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Completely portal robotic anatomic segmentectomy is safe and effective and offers outstanding intraoperative 30-day and 90-day results. The recurrence rate is approximately 3% at 2.5 years.

The role of segmental nodes in the pathological staging of non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Segmental nodes are not examined routinely in current clinical practice for lung cancer, the role of segmental nodes in pathological staging of non-small cell lung cancer after radical resection was investigated.

Methods

A total of 113 consecutive non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent radical resection between June 2009 and December 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. All the operations were performed by the same group of surgeons. N2 nodes, hilar nodes, interlobar nodes and some lobar nodes were collected during surgery. The removed lung lobes were dissected routinely along lobar and segmental bronchi to collect lobar nodes and segmental nodes. The collected lymph nodes were separately labeled for histological examination.

Results

The detection rates of hilar nodes, interlobar nodes, lobar nodes and segmental nodes were 61.1%, 85.0%, 75.2% and 80.5%, respectively. The metastasis rates of hilar nodes, interlobar nodes, lobar nodes and segmental nodes were 5.3%, 10.5%, 16.8% and 14.2%, respectively. There were 68 cases of N0 disease, 16 cases of N1 disease and 29 cases of N2 disease. If an analysis of segmental lymph nodes had been omitted, six patients (37.5% of N1 disease) would have been down-staged to N0, and two cases of multiple-zone N1 disease would have been misdiagnosed as single-zone N1 disease, one patient would have been misdiagnosed as N2 disease with skip metastases.

Conclusion

Segmental nodes play an important role in the accurate staging of non-small cell lung cancer, and routinely dissecting the segmental bronchi to collect the lymph nodes is feasible and may be necessary.

Prognosis of unexpected and expected pathologic N1 non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to compare clinicopathologic features and survival between patients with unexpected N1 (clinical N0-pathologic N1) and expected N1 disease (clinical N1-pathologic N1) after operation for non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

From 2003 to 2009, 305 patients who were found to have pathologic N1 disease after complete resection were retrospectively analyzed. Among these, 177 patients had negative findings for both computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT (group cN0). Sixty-eight patients had negative CT and positive PET/CT or positive CT and negative PET/CT findings (group cN0-1). Sixty patients had positive findings for both CT and PET/CT (group cN1).

RESULTS

Patients in the cN1 group had larger tumors (p<0.001), greater pathologic T stage (p=0.018), and greater percentage of squamous cell carcinoma (p<0.001) than did those in the other groups. Patients in the cN1 group had a greater number of positive N1 lymph nodes (p=0.004) and more frequent extracapsular nodal invasion (p<0.001). The 5-year overall survival was 66%, 63%, and 58% in groups cN0, cN0-1, and cN1, respectively (cN0 vs cN0-1, p=0.958; cN0 vs cN1, p=0.038). The 5-year disease-free survival was 54%, 52%, and 39% in groups cN0, cN0-1, and cN1, respectively (cN0 vs cN0-1, p=0.862; cN0 vs cN1, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with unexpected N1 disease showed better survival than did those with expected N1 disease, which seemed to be related to the pathologically minimal extent of the primary tumor and nodal involvement.

[Indications for surgery in non-small cell lung cancer with lymph node invasion]

Surgery is indicated for N1 non-small cell lung cancer and performed, with good results in some patients, when N2 disease is not diagnosed preoperatively "minimal N2". Following the publication of the "EORTC 08941" and "Intergroup 0139" trials, it remains debatable for patients with proven N2 disease. Good prognostic factors before treatment or post-induction favour surgery, which seems superior to radiochemotherapy if the operative risk is low (lobectomies, and some pneumonectomies). N3 status is a contraindication to surgery, except in some rare cases with a strong response to induction treatment.

N1 non-small-cell lung cancer. A 20-year surgical experience

N1 non-small-cell lung cancer has heterogeneous prognosis in relation to node descriptors. There is no agreement on the ideal type of resection. A new classification of N1 descriptors was proposed in the 7th edition of the TNM staging system. A retrospective study was conducted on 384 patients with T1-T3N1 non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent complete pulmonary resection. The prognostic role of N1 descriptors according to the current and new staging systems and type of resection was investigated. The 5-year survival rate was 46%. Involvement of hilar node stations, multiple stations, and multiple nodes were poor prognostic factors (5-year survival, 33%, 21%, and 30%, respectively), as well as involvement of the hilar zone and multiple zones (5-year survival, 27% and 23%, respectively). Pneumonectomy showed significantly better survival rates compared to lobectomy or bilobectomy (5-year survival, 60% vs. 29%). Multivariate analysis showed that the number of N1 zones and type of resection were independent prognostic factors. Patients with hilar nodal, multiple-level, or multiple-zone involvement had poor prognosis. Standard lobectomy remains the procedure of choice, but in cases of fixed nodes in the hilar zone, sleeve resection or even pneumonectomy should be considered.