Surgical considerations for the management and resection of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Endoscopic treatment outcome of oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours

BACKGROUND

There are few clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results for oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Thus, the objective of this study was to identify the clinicopathologic characteristics and clinical results of oesophageal GISTs.

AIM

To investigate endoscopic treatment effective of oesophageal GISTs.

METHODS

It was retrospective research that collected 32 patients with oesophageal GISTs treated by endoscopic resection (ER) between January 2012 and January 2023 in two Hospital. Clinicopathologic, endoscopic records, and follow-up data were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients underwent en bloc resection and 24 (75.0%) lesions underwent R0 resection. The size of GISTs was 2.12 ± 1.88 cm. The overall complication rate was 25.0%, including hydrothorax and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection electrocoagulation syndrome. The mean mitotic index was 3.34 ± 5.04 (median, 1.50; range, 1.00-4.00). Eighteen (56.3%), 6 (18.8%), 2 (6.3%), and 6 (18.8%) patients were identified as very low, low, intermediate, and high risk, respectively. Three patients developed recurrence after a median follow-up of 64.69 ± 33.13 months. The 5-year overall survival rate was 100%, and the disease-free survival rate was 90.6%.

CONCLUSION

ER is safe and effective for patients with low-risk oesophageal GISTs. Early detection of oesophageal GISTs is essential to achieve a favourable prognosis.

Management of subepithelial esophageal tumors

Subepithelial esophageal tumors (SET) are normally benign intramural esophageal lesions of mesenchymal origin. Although rare, the incidence of SET has increased in recent decades due to the more widespread use of endoscopy and diagnostic imaging. The current review aims to provide an overview of the histopathologic spectrum and the most frequent entities including leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), diagnostic workup, and multidisciplinary treatment options. Staging for SET should include endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), and tissue sampling. Current consensus guidelines recommend that SET suggestive of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) larger than 20 mm or lesions with high-risk stigmata should undergo tissue sampling. Most SET have an excellent long-term outcome, but malignancy may be present in certain subtypes. Asymptomatic SET without high-risk stigmata discovered incidentally usually do not require specific treatment. However, depending on the size and location of the lesion symptoms may occur. Therapeutic interventions range from endoscopic interventional resections to major surgical procedures. Enucleation via minimally invasive or robotic-assisted access remains the standard of care for most SET sub-entities.

Successfully treated esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor by minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by imatinib therapy: a case report

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a common malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract, but rarely occurs in the esophagus, composing approximately 0.7% of all GISTs. Surgery is a mainstay treatment for this disease. We herein report a case of a 68-year-old male patient treated by thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy followed by imatinib therapy for a large esophageal GIST, and also review a literature regarding this disease.

Case report

A 68-year-old male was admitted to our hospital due to dysphagia. After the initial investigations, the patient was diagnosed with esophageal GIST and underwent thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy. Final immunohistochemistry (IHC) was positive with CD117, CD34, DOG-1, Ki67 without the expression of SMA, S-100 that confirmed GIST. The patient was referred to adjuvant therapy with imatinib and there was no recurrence at 16 months after surgery.

Discussion

Due to the rarity of esophageal GISTs, diagnosis and treatment remain challenging. Without immunohistochemistry, this disease may be misdiagnosed as esophageal leiomyoma, or with other mesenchymal tumors such as sarcoma or schwannoma due to similar clinical, endoscopic and radiographic characteristics. Surgery is the cornerstone treatment, the choice of enucleation or esophagectomy depends on the comprehensive evaluation of clinical and pathologic factors of the specific case. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment with imatinib is an effective therapy for selective patients.

Conclusion

GISTs are rare neoplasms of the esophagus. Currently, surgical resection is the cornerstone treatment, adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib may be indicated for selective patients. Clinical trials are expected with longer follow-ups to develop concrete guidelines for this disease.

Minimally Invasive Enucleation of Esophageal Leiomyoma: Experience From a Single Institution

INTRODUCTION

Esophageal leiomyoma is a rare disease, most of which are benign, and endoscopic tumor removal surgery is a widely accepted treatment method. The two surgical approaches, laparoscopic and thoracoscopic, must be selected and applied according to the tumor size and location. The study aimed to evaluate the results, feasibility, and appropriate approach of minimally invasive surgery to treat esophageal leiomyoma. Subjects and research methods: A retrospective study of 27 cases of patients who underwent endoscopic tumor removal surgery to treat esophageal leiomyoma at Cho Ray Hospital was conducted from January 2015 to April 2020. Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, surgical characteristics, and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 16 men and 11 women were included in the study, with an average age of 47.2 years (25-76 years). In total, 92.6% of patients had symptoms, the most common being dysphagia (n = 19); however, 7.4% of patients still had no symptoms. Tumor removal through right thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 18 patients; the remaining nine patients were approached through laparoscopic intra-abdominal surgery. The median tumor size in all patients is 3.0 cm (2.0-5.0 cm), with the smallest tumor being 1.2 cm and the largest tumor being 8 cm. Postoperative histopathology shows esophageal leiomyoma in 100% of cases. Three cases (11.1%) of esophageal mucosal perforation and one case (3.7%) of tracheal perforation occurred during surgery. There was no case of death or suture leak after surgery. There was one case of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux that was treated successfully with medical treatment for two weeks. The average follow-up period was 21.4 months, with no deaths or recurrences during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic surgery is a safe, minimally invasive method for esophageal leiomyoma removal, with laparoscopy used for tumors near the gastroesophageal junction and right thoracoscopic surgery for remaining tumors, ensuring quick patient recovery.

Optimal management options for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST)

OBJECTIVE

To explore the different treatment modalities for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST) and their respective applicability and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study in which consecutive patients diagnosed with E-GIST at our hospital from January 2017 to August 2023 were included. The clinical characteristics of all the patients as well as long-term quality of life were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 23 (12 males, 11 females) E-GIST patients with a mean age of 56.7 ± 12.0 years were included in this study. Common symptoms, including upper abdominal pain, acid reflux, and heartburn, accounted for over 60 % of cases. Fifteen patients underwent endoscopic resection, five patients underwent surgical resection, two patients underwent surgical resection after receiving preoperative imatinib therapy, and one patient received conservative management.

CONCLUSION

Different treatment strategies may be applied to the patients with E-GIST depending on the their clinical features. Our study provides insights into precise treatment for different patients. However, due to the rarity of the disease, it is challenging to collect a large sample size from a single center, necessitating more multicenter prospective large-scale studies.

Analysis of Thoracoscopic Enucleation Combined with Esophagoscopy in the Prone Position for Esophageal Submucosal Tumor

Background: Esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs) are rare, occurring in less than 1% of esophageal neoplasms. For surgical treatment of esophageal SMTs, enucleation is usually the procedure of choice for benign tumors. This study aimed at evaluating the surgical technique and outcomes of thoracoscopic enucleation with esophagoscopy for esophageal SMTs. Methods: Patients with esophageal SMTs who underwent thoracoscopic enucleation between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively investigated. Surgery was performed with the patient in the prone position. First, an esophagoscope was inserted, and a sodium hyaluronate solution with indigo carmine dye was injected into the submucosal layer just below the tumor. Next, under thoracoscopy, the tumor was exposed through a thoracoscopic incision and dissection of the muscularis propria and adventitia was performed at the tumor site. The colored layer resulting from the previously injected dye was identified, and tumor enucleation was performed under guidance of the dye so as not to damage the mucosa or pseudocapsule. Results: In total, 5 surgeries were performed. The mean operative time was 122.6 minutes (range 84-168 minutes), mean blood loss was 21.1 mL (range 0-80 mL), and mean postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range 7-10 days). There were no postoperative complications. Pathological diagnosis revealed 2 cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 2 cases of schwannoma, and 1 case of leiomyoma. Conclusions: We believe that this technique is a useful and safe method of performing thoracoscopic enucleation of esophageal SMTs because the injected dye provides an indicator of the resection line during enucleation.

Referral patterns of GIST patients: data from a nationwide study

BACKGROUND

This study compares the characteristics, referral and treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients treated in reference and non-reference centers in the Netherlands.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study on patients diagnosed between 2016 and 2019, utilises data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Database. Patients were categorized into two groups: patients diagnosed in or referred to reference centers and patients diagnosed in non-reference centers without referral.

RESULTS

This study included 1,550 GIST patients with a median age of 67.0 in reference and 68.0 years in non-reference centers. Eighty-seven per cent of patients were diagnosed in non-reference centers, of which 36.5% (493/1,352) were referred to a reference center. Referral rates were higher for high-risk (62.2% [74/119]) and metastatic patients (67.2% [90/134]). Mutation analysis was performed in 96.9% and 87.6% of these cases in reference and in non-reference centers (p < 0.01), respectively. Systemic therapy was given in reference centers versus non-reference in 89.5% versus 82.0% (p < 0.01) of high-risk and in 94.1% versus 65.9% (p < 0.01) of metastatic patients, respectively. The proportion of positive resection margins and tumor rupture did not differ between reference and non-reference centers. Median OS was not reached.

CONCLUSION

A substantial amount of metastatic GIST patients in non-reference centers did not receive systemic treatment. This might be due to valid reasons. However, optimisation of the referral strategy of GIST patients in the Netherlands could benefit patients. Further research is needed to explore reasons for not starting systemic treatment in metastatic GIST patients.

Rare malignant neoplasm of the esophagus: current status and future perspectives

Esophageal cancer is common worldwide, including in Japan, and its major histological subtype is squamous cell carcinoma. However, there are some rare esophageal cancers, including neuroendocrine neoplasm, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, carcinosarcoma and malignant melanoma. The biological and clinical features of these cancers differ from those of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore, different treatment strategies are needed for these cancers but are based on limited evidence. Neuroendocrine neoplasm is mainly divided into neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma by differentiation and the Ki-67 proliferation index or mitotic index. Epidemiologically, the majority of esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms are neuroendocrine carcinoma. The treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma is similar to that of small cell lung cancer, which has similar morphological and biological features. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor is known to be associated with alterations in the c-KIT and platelet-derived growth factor receptor genes and, if resectable, is treated in accordance with the modified Fletcher classification. Carcinosarcoma is generally resistant to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy and requires multimodal treatments such as surgery plus chemotherapy to achieve cure. Primary malignant melanoma is resistant to cytotoxic chemotherapy, but immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently demonstrated efficacy for malignant melanoma of the esophagus. This review focuses on the current status and future perspectives for rare cancer of the esophagus.

Large esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors resected thoracoscopically after oral imatinib therapy: a report of two cases

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are very rare, accounting for 2–5% of all GISTs. As with other GISTs, the principle of surgical treatment is complete resection with negative margins. In addition to biological grades of GISTs itselves, local recurrence due to capsular damage is a known risk. We describe two cases of massive esophageal GISTs that were successfully resected thoracoscopically after 2 months administration of 400 mg imatinib, with some discussion of the literature. Case 1, the patient was a 51-years-old man. After treated with 400 mg of imatinib as preoperative chemotherapy for 2 months, we performed surgery that included right thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and jejunostomy. The resection specimen and histopathology were esophageal GIST-LtMtAeG, 110 × 95 mm. The postoperative course was uneventful, and was discharged on postoperative day 14. The patient has been recurrence free for 11 months postoperatively. Case 2, the patient was a 70-years-old man. After treated with 400 mg of imatinib as preoperative chemotherapy for 2 months, we performed surgery that included right thoracoscopic subtotal esophagectomy, gastric tube reconstruction, and jejunostomy. The resection specimen and histopathology were esophageal GIST-LtAeG, 90 × 52 mm. The postoperative course was uneventful, and was discharged on postoperative day 14. The patient has been recurrence free for 9 months postoperatively.

Huge esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor successfully resected under mediastino-laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GISTs) are often diagnosed early due to complaints such as dysphagia and are rarely found to be huge in size. Here, we report the treatment of a case of huge E-GIST successfully resected by minimally invasive surgery after neoadjuvant imatinib therapy.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 86-year-old male patient with a 3-month history of dysphagia was referred to our hospital because of a suspected mediastinal tumor on chest X-ray. The chest computed tomography scan revealed a huge solid tumor, of about 100 mm in diameter, protruding into the left thoracic cavity. Histopathological examination results of fine-needle aspiration biopsy under endoscopic ultrasonography revealed a c-kit and CD34-positive esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The patient received neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib (400 mg/day) to reduce the size of the tumor and prevent rupture during resection. After 28 days of oral administration of imatinib, the tumor size decreased. However, the patient refused to continue treatment with imatinib and therefore underwent mediastino-laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. We successfully resected the tumor completely with mediastino-laparoscopic surgical techniques. Esophageal reconstruction was performed using a gastric tube in the posterior sternal route. After an uneventful postoperative course, the patient was discharged postoperative day 14. Immunohistochemical findings of the resected specimen showed that the tumor cells were positive for c-kit, DOG-1 and CD34 and negative for smooth muscle actin and S100.

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid surgical procedure utilizing mediastino-laparoscopy might be useful for high-risk patient with esophageal tumors.

Needle tract seeding and abdominal recurrence following pre-treatment biopsy of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST): results of a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are rare abdominal tumors. Pretreatment biopsies may be used to diagnose a GIST and enable tailored treatment. Some experts are skeptical about biopsies because they fear tumor cell seeding. The objective of this study was to determine if pretreatment biopsy is associated with increased tumor recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search and included studies assessing the oncological outcome of GIST patients who underwent a pre-treatment core needle biopsy or fine needle aspiration. We assessed methodological quality with the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale for non-randomized studies. This review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42021170290).

RESULTS

Three non-randomized studies and eight case reports comprising 350 patients were eligible for inclusion. No prospective study designed to answer the review question was found. One case of needle tract seeding after percutaneous core needle biopsy of GIST was reported. None of the studies reported an increased rate of abdominal recurrence in patients with pretreatment biopsy.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing evidence does not indicate a relevant risk of needle tract seeding or abdominal recurrence after pre-treatment biopsy of GIST. Biopsy can safely be done to differentiate GIST from other tumors and to select the most appropriate treatment.

Endoscopic treatment can be a viable therapeutic option for esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs) are extremely rare. We sought to determine whether endoscopic treatment can be a viable therapeutic option for esophageal GISTs.

METHODS

A total of 20 cases with histological diagnosis of esophageal GISTs were obtained from our center between 2008 and 2020. Data on the clinicopathological features and treatment were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 9 males (45%) and 11 females (55%) in this study, with a median age of 56 years. The tumors preferentially occurred in the middle and lower parts of the thoracic esophagus (45 and 40%, respectively). The mean size of the tumors was 2.27 cm and mitotic index was no more than 5/50 high power field (HPF) in all patients. In this study, 11 patients received endoscopic treatment and nine patients underwent surgical resection. Tumors ranged from 0.6 to 4 cm in the endoscopic treatment patients and 0.5 to 7 cm in the surgical patients. There were no significant differences in gender, age, symptoms, tumor location, tumor size, mitotic index, and adjuvant imatinib therapy between the endoscopic treatment group and the surgery group (all p > .05). The Kaplan-Meier curve suggested that there was also no significant difference in disease-free survival between the two groups (p = .264).

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic treatment may be an option for the treatment of esophageal GISTs smaller than 5 cm with a mitotic index no more than 5/50 HPF.

Limited Resection Versus Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Duodenal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors? Enucleation Interferes in the Debate: A European Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical procedure for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (D-GISTs) remains poorly defined. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) allows for a wide resection but is associated with a high morbidity rate.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of PD versus limited resection (LR) for D-GISTs and to evaluate the role of tumor enucleation (EN).

METHODS

In this retrospective European multicenter cohort study, 100 patients who underwent resection for D-GIST between 2001 and 2013 were compared between PD (n = 19) and LR (n = 81). LR included segmental duodenectomy (n = 47), wedge resection (n = 21), or EN (n = 13). The primary objective was to evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) between the groups, while the secondary objectives were to analyze the overall morbidity and mortality, radicality of resection, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence rates between groups. Furthermore, the short- and long-term outcomes of EN were evaluated.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between the PD and LR groups, except for a more frequent D2 tumor location in the PD group (68.3% vs. 29.6%; p = 0.016). Postoperative morbidity was higher after PD (68.4% vs. 23.5%; p < 0.001). OS (p = 0.70) and DFS (p = 0.64) were comparable after adjustment for D2 location and adjuvant therapy rate. EN was performed more in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) stage III/IV patients with tumors < 5 cm and was associated with a 5-year OS rate of 84.6%, without any disease recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

For D-GISTs, LR should be the procedure of choice due to lower morbidity and similar oncological outcomes compared with PD. In selected patients, EN appears to be associated with equivalent short- and long-term outcomes. Based on these results, a surgical treatment algorithm is proposed.

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the esophagus: A case report

Introduction

A gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) often arises in the stomach and small intestine, while esophageal GIST is rare. The first-choice treatment is surgical resection, but there is no standard technique. Herein, we describe our experience in the treatment of esophageal GIST and discuss the usefulness of robotic esophagectomy.

Presentation of case

The patient was a 60-year-old woman, who was diagnosed with a 30 mm GIST in the middle thoracic esophagus. We underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. The duration of the thoracoscopic part was 69 min and the total operation time was 319 min. Total blood loss was 135 ml. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful after surgery and the patient was discharged home in good condition on the 18th postoperative day.

Discussion

The prognosis of esophageal GIST was less favorable compared with gastric GIST, and due to the anatomical peculiarities of the esophagus, which surgical procedure should be performed is still under debate. Robotic surgery has several technological advantages as it provides a three-dimensional view, ten times magnification, tremor control, and ambidexterity. Therefore, Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) allows achieving for safe R0 resection of esophageal GIST.

Conclusion

RAMIE may be useful for esophageal GIST because it facilitates safe and minimally invasive surgery in a limited space of the thoracic cavity.

•

There is no standard technique due to the anatomical peculiarities of the esophagus.

•

We think McKeown's procedure in the prone position has some advantages from others.

•

Robot surgery has a three-dimensional view, tremor control, and ambidexterity.

•

RAMIE would be useful techniques in a limited space of the thoracic cavity.

The hybrid procedure of thoracoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic resection of an esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST) are very rare tumors, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach for E-GISTs. Here, we report a case of a large E-GIST that was resected via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS). When examining for comorbidities of myasthenia gravis using computed tomography, a 7-cm-sized tumor was detected in the lower esophagus of a 68-year-old woman. Further examination revealed the tumor to be an E-GIST with high malignant potential, and thus, esophagectomy was performed. The hybrid procedure for VATS and HALS techniques was safe and minimally invasive for this E-GIST that required esophagectomy. Thus, esophagectomy with VATS and HALS is thought to be a reasonable surgical option for resecting large E-GISTs, for which enucleation is not recommended.

Clinicopathological features and treatment outcome of oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): A large, retrospective multicenter European study

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) account for ≤1% of all GISTs. Consequently, evidence to guide clinical decision-making is limited.

METHODS

Clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with primary oesophageal GIST from seven European countries were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were identified, and median follow up was 55.0 months. At diagnosis, 59.0% had localized disease, 25.3% locally advanced and 13.3% synchronous metastasis. A biopsy (Fine Needle aspiration n = 29, histological biopsy n = 31) was performed in 60 (72.3%) patients. The mitotic count was low (<5 mitoses/50 High Power Fields (HPF)) in 24 patients and high (≥5 mitoses/50 HPF) in 27 patients. Fifty-one (61.4%) patients underwent surgical or endoscopic resection. The most common reasons to not perform an immediate resection (n = 31) were; unresectable or metastasized GIST, performance status/comorbidity, patient refusal or ongoing neo-adjuvant therapy. The type of resections were enucleation (n = 11), segmental resection (n = 6) and oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction (n = 33), with median tumour size of 3.3 cm, 4.5 cm and 7.7 cm, respectively. In patients treated with enucleation 18.2% developed recurrent disease. The recurrence rate in patients treated with segmental resection was 16.7% and in patients undergoing oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction 36.4%. Larger tumours (≥4.0 cm) and high (>5/5hpf) mitotic count were associated with worse disease free survival.

CONCLUSION

Based on the current study, enucleation can be recommended for oesophageal GIST smaller than 4 cm, while oesophagectomy should be preserved for larger tumours. Patients with larger tumours (>4 cm) and/or high mitotic count should be treated with adjuvant therapy.

Endoscopic diagnosis and management of gastric subepithelial lesions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an in-depth review of gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) and describe the current approach to endoscopic diagnosis and management of these lesions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gastric SELs are a relatively frequent finding on routine endoscopy (incidence 0.2-3%). A systematic approach to diagnosis and management is key because many SELs are of little consequence, while others carry a high risk of malignant transformation. Because esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) cannot delineate depth of invasion or subepithelial appearance, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) should be considered a first-line modality. Recent data suggest EUS-guided fine needle biopsy (FNB) may be superior to traditional fine needle aspiration (FNA) for the diagnosis of gastric SELs due to its ability to obtain histologic specimens for immunohistochemical staining. Alternative techniques for tissue sampling (combined with simultaneous resection) include submucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), submucosal tunnelling with endoscopic resection (STER) or endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR).

SUMMARY

This review details the endoscopic diagnosis and management of gastric SELs. Although EUS-guided sampling remains a first-line strategy (preferably with FNB), recent techniques including ESD, STER and EFTR have the potential to provide additional diagnostic and therapeutic options.

Diagnosis and Endoscopic Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Arising from Esophagus

Aim: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnosis and endoscopic treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arising from esophagus. Materials and Methods: From January 2013 to December 2017, 16 cases of GISTs of esophagus were retrospectively identified from a total of >3000 GISTs treated in our center. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, endoscopic therapy outcomes, histopathology, and follow-up were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the patients was 53 years (range 35-71 years), mostly female (56.3%). Seven tumors were in the lower esophagus, five in the middle esophagus, and one in the upper esophagus. The most common symptom was abdominal discomfort (8/16; 50.0%), followed by acid reflux (6/16; 37.5%). All of the patients underwent CT scan, gastroscopy, and/or endoscopic ultrasound. Two patients were diagnosed with esophageal GISTs with a preoperative endoscopic biopsy. Tumors were resected completely in all patients by endoscopic surgery. The median operating time was 85 minutes (range 28-153 minutes), and the average tumor size was 11.6 mm (range 6-21 mm). Postoperative histopathology demonstrated esophageal GISTs were positive for CD117 and CD34. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.7 days (range 2-7 days). The median postoperative follow-up duration was 28 months (range 1-59 months). Conclusion: Endoscopic treatment seems to be safe and effective for tumors size <20 mm in diameter. However, long-term prospective randomized controlled trials are further needed.

A large national comparative study of clinicopathological features and long-term survivals between esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor and leiomyosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GIST) and leiomyosarcoma (E-LMS) are rare tumors. Previous studies are limited to small number of patients. We sought to study these two tumors using a large national database.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base 2004-2014 was queried for patients with E-GIST and E-LMS. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models were used to investigate OS predictors.

RESULTS

We found 141 E-GIST and 38 E-LMS patients, with esophagectomy and systemic treatment rate of 55% and 49% for E-GIST and 50% and 26% for E-LMS. The 5-year OS of E-GIST and E-LMS were 62% and 23%, respectively, p < 0.001. In multivariable analysis, young age, tumor <10 cm, esophagectomy, and E-GIST were associated with superior OS. There was a higher median and mean OS with neoadjuvant vs. upfront surgery for E-GIST group (98 and 111 vs 79 and 80 months).

CONCLUSION

E E-GIST has superior OS compared to E-LMS. Esophagectomy is the cornerstone treatment modality. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of neoadjuvant therapy in E-GIST patients.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the esophagus: current issues of diagnosis, surgery and drug therapy

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) often arise in the stomach and small intestine, while esophageal GISTs are rare. Due to their rarity, clinicopathological data on esophageal GISTs are extremely limited, and this results in a lack of clear recommendations concerning optimal surgical management for esophageal GISTs. It is difficult to distinguish esophageal GIST from leiomyoma, the most frequent esophageal mesenchymal tumor, prior to resection, because the two types of tumors appear similar on computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). Fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under EUS enables definitive diagnosis, but it is often avoided because scarring could make enucleation more difficult and increase the risk of tumor dissemination by capsule destruction. Esophageal segmental and wedge resections are not usually performed due to the anatomical peculiarity of the esophagus, and the surgical options are limited to the highly invasive esophagectomy or the much less invasive surgical tumor enucleation. The decision as to which surgical procedure should be performed for esophageal GISTs is still under debate. Tumor enucleation may be permitted for smaller tumors, and esophagectomy may be recommended for larger GISTs or high-risk tumors with a high mitotic rate. The purpose of neoadjuvant imatinib administration is downsizing of the GIST to reduce the extent of resection and to reduce the risk of intraoperative complications, including tumor rupture. The efficacy of neoadjuvant/adjuvant imatinib therapy for esophageal GISTs is poorly understood, because the reports are limited to case reports or case series with small numbers. More clinicopathological data and clinical trials for esophageal GIST are expected.

Management of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: review of one hundred seven patients

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are the most common type of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor, but are rarely found in the thoracic esophagus. There is no clear consensus about the optimal treatment of this rare disease. A systematic search of the literature was performed for localized esophageal GIST that was resected between 2000 and 2015, and individual patients were included from two major academic institutions. We obtained information on demographics, tumor size and location, mitotic rate, treatment method, and time to recurrence or death. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to evaluate the factors associated with recurrence or death. A total of 28 studies met our inclusion and exclusion criteria, and with two patients from two academic institutions, we had a total of 107 patients in the study. Due to lack of uniformity among studies, there were several missing data for different variables. The average patient age was 56 (n = 98) with mostly males (60%, n = 91). The average tumor size on the CT scan was 7.9 ± 5.4 cm (n = 91), located mostly in the distal esophagus (81%, n = 74). A similar number of patients underwent enucleation (n = 47) compared to esophagectomy (n = 42). Approximately half of the patients had a mitotic rate of 0-4 mitosis per 50 high-powered field (48%, n = 80). The median survival time was 73 months with a 5-year disease free survival of 57% (n = 97). Univariate Cox regression analyses showed that a large tumor, undergoing esophagectomy, and a high mitotic rate were associated with poor survival or recurrence control. We found that patients with a lesion smaller than or equal to 5 cm on the CT scan had a better disease-free survival rate than those with a size greater than 5 cm (HR = 12.41, p = 0.014) and had a 5-year survival rate of 92% with 90% of those patients undergoing enucleation (n = 29). Esophageal GIST is a very rare malignancy. The tumor size and mitotic rate of the tumor are associated with poor survival. However, patients with esophageal GIST measuring 5 cm or smaller may be safely treated with esophageal enucleation.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours of the oesophagus: a clinicopathological and molecular analysis of 27 cases

AIMS

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) may arise anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract, but are rare in the oesophagus. We describe the clinical, pathological and molecular characteristics of 27 primary oesophageal GISTs, the largest series to date.

METHODS AND RESULTS

DNA was extracted and exons 9, 11, 13 and 17 of KIT, exons 12, 14 and 18 of PDGFRA and exon 15 of BRAF were amplified and sequenced. Oesophageal GISTs occurred in 14 men and 13 women aged between 22 and 80 years (mean: 56 years). All 27 cases were immunohistochemically positive for KIT, and 92 and 47% co-expressed CD34 or smooth muscle actin, respectively. Fifteen (71% of analysed cases) harboured KIT exon 11 mutations and one case each had a mutation in KIT exon 13 (K642E) or BRAF exon 15 (V600E). Long-term follow-up data (median, 96.5 months) were obtained for 20 cases; two patients had metastases at presentation and seven had developed local recurrence and/or metastasis after surgery. A large tumour size (≥ 10 cm), high mitotic rate (> 5/5 mm² ), presence of a deletion mutation in KIT exon 11 involving codons 557-558 and a positive microscopic margin were associated with recurrence and metastasis. The KIT mutations identified in oesophageal GISTs are similar to those observed in gastric GISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete surgical resection with clear margins is recommended, if technically feasible, and genotyping can help to improve diagnosis and further patient management in oesophageal GIST.

Patterns of care and clinical outcomes in primary oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): A retrospective study of the French Sarcoma Group (FSG)

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal GIST (ESOGIST) are very rare tumours requiring special consideration regarding diagnosis, surgical management, and perioperative treatment.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted across 9 centres in the French Sarcoma Group (FSG) to characterize all patients in the years 2000-2014.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients (pts) with primary localized ESOGIST were identified, with median age 69 years (36-81) and 11 females. Eight tumours (T) occurred in the lower third of the oesophagus, five in the oesophageal gastric junction, two in the superior third, and two in the middle third. All pts underwent oesophagoscopy and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and CT scan. Fifteen had EUS guided biopsy. Nine pts received Imatinib (IM) as initial treatment resulting in six PR, three SD. Tumours were resected in nine pts (53%) (7 upfront, 2 after IM); via enucleation in four (44%) [median size 4 cm], oesophagectomy in five (56%) [median size 10 cm]. Resections were R0 in three pts (33%), R1 in six (66%). Eight pts (47%) had no tumour resection, and one patient was never treated. Six pts received adjuvant IM. With a median follow-up of 24 months (7-101), 11 pts are alive (64.7%), five died (29.4%), one was lost to follow-up. Two pts of 4 pts relapsed following enucleation.

CONCLUSIONS

ESOGIST can be reliably identified pre-operatively by EUS-guided biopsy. Surgery for ESOGIST is either enucleation or oesophagectomy depending on tumour size, location, and patient's individual surgical risk. Preoperative IM therapy could improve resectability and should be considered if surgery is contraindicated or would lead to negative impact on the functional status of the patient.

Spectrum of FDG uptake in large (>10 cm) esophageal leiomyomas

Esophageal leiomyomas are rare benign tumors that can be treated successfully with limited surgical resection. It is occasionally important to distinguish leiomyomas from more aggressive submucosal esophageal tumors, most notably gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). GISTs have a worse prognosis, particularly when they are large (>10 cm). Increased uptake of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose on positron emission tomography (PET) scans is common in GISTs, potentially allowing PET scanning to differentiate between GIST and benign esophageal tumors. Three patients presented with large (>10 cm) esophageal masses of ranging PET avidity [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 1.3-10.1]. All were treated surgically and histologically confirmed to be esophageal leiomyomas. Unfortunately, the wide range of PET uptake precludes PET scanning from differentiating large leiomyomas from more aggressive lesions.

Clinicopathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Esophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor: Evaluation of a Pooled Case Series

Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in esophagus are limited, because of the relatively rare incidence of esophageal GISTs. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of esophageal GISTs, and to investigate the potential factors that may predict prognosis.Esophageal GIST cases were obtained from our center and from case reports and clinical studies extracted from MEDLINE. Clinicopathologic features and survivals were analyzed and compared with gastric GISTs from our center.The most common location was lower esophagus (86.84%), followed by middle and upper esophagus (11.40% and 1.76%). The majority of esophageal GISTs were classified as high-risk category (70.83%). Mitotic index was correlated with histologic type, mutational status, and tumor size. The 5-year disease-free survival and disease-specific survival were 65.1% and 65.9%, respectively. Tumor size, mitotic index, and National Institutes of Health risk classification were associated with prognosis of esophageal GISTs. Only tumor size, however, was the independent risk factor for the prognosis of esophageal GISTs. In comparison to gastric GISTs, the distribution of tumor size, histologic type, and National Institutes of Health risk classification were significantly different between esophageal GISTs and gastric GISTs. The disease-free survival and disease-specific survival of esophageal GISTs were significantly lower than that of gastric GISTs.The most common location for esophageal GISTs was lower esophagus, and most of the esophageal GISTs are high-risk category. Tumor size was the independent risk factor for the prognosis of esophageal GISTs. Esophageal GISTs differ significantly from gastric GISTs in respect to clinicopathologic features. The prognosis of esophageal GISTs was worse than that of gastric GISTs.

Surgical Resection of Rare Esophageal Cancers

BACKGROUND

Although surgical resection of adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus is standard practice, the treatment strategy for other malignant rare esophageal cancers is still under debate. The aim of this study was to examine the treatment of rare malignant esophageal cancers and to evaluate the survival of these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all esophagectomies performed at Mayo Clinic from 1980 to 2014 (approximately 4,000 cases) identified 24 patients with histologic features other than adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Their medical records were reviewed for demographics, presenting symptoms, evaluation, surgical management, pathologic features, and short-term and long-term outcome.

RESULTS

Pathologic identifications included small cell carcinoma, lymphoma, and undifferentiated carcinoma in 4 (16.7%) patients each and neuroendocrine, melanoma, leiomyosarcoma, sarcomatoid, sarcoma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor in 2 (8.3%) patients each. The most common presenting symptoms included dysphasia in 91.7% patients (22/24), pain in 75.0% (18/24), and weight loss in 62.5% (15/24). Preoperative evaluation included barium swallow in 91.7% (22/24), computed tomography in 91.7% (22/24), positron emission tomography in 54.2% (13/24), esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 100% (24/24), and endoscopic ultrasonography in 29.2% (7/24) patients. The location of the tumor was at the gastroesophageal junction in 41.7% (10/24). There was no operative mortality, and 13 patients (54.16%) had at least one postoperative adverse event. The 1-year survival after esophagectomy was 69.7%, the 5-year survival was 42.7%, and the 10-year survival was 37.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal cancer with pathologic features other than squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma is rare. Esophagectomy for rare types of malignant esophageal cancers should be considered part of the effective treatment paradigm.

Diagnosis and surgical treatment of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

AIM: To retrospectively evaluate our experience with the diagnosis and surgical resection of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

METHODS: Between January 2003 and August 2014, five esophageal GIST cases were admitted to our hospital. In this study, the hospital records, surgery outcomes, tumor recurrence and survival of these patients were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 45.6 years (range: 12-62 years). Three patients presented with dysphagia, and one patient presented with chest discomfort. The remaining patient was asymptomatic. Four patients were diagnosed with esophageal GISTs by a preoperative endoscopic biopsy. Three patients underwent esophagectomy, and two patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. The mean operating time was 116 min (range: 95-148 min), and the mean blood loss was 176 mL (range: 30-300 mL). All tumors were completely resected. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 8.4 d (range: 6-12 d). All patients recovered and were discharged successfully. The median postoperative follow-up duration was 48 mo (range: 29-72 mo). One patient was diagnosed with recurrence, one patient was lost to follow-up, and three patients were asymptomatic and are currently being managed with close radiologic and clinical follow-up.

CONCLUSION: Surgery is the standard, effective and successful treatment for esophageal GISTs. Long-term follow-up is required to monitor recurrence and metastasis.

Effective Downsizing of a Large Oesophageal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumour with Neoadjuvant Imatinib Enabling an Uncomplicated and without Tumour Rupture Laparoscopic-Assisted Ivor-Lewis Oesophagectomy

Neoadjuvant imatinib for gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) is increasingly used nowadays. As oesophagectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality, a preoperative downsizing of an oesophageal GIST to limit the extent of resection would be ideal. Because these tumours are rare and neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib is recent, there is limited literature available regarding neoadjuvant administration of imatinib in patients with oesophageal GISTs. A 50-year-old woman presented with total dysphagia. An upper endoscopy and biopsy revealed a large submucosal KIT-positive GIST obstructing the mid oesophagus. CT confirmed a lesion measuring 99 mm × 50 mm × 104 mm. Because the size and location of the tumour increased the risk of intraoperative rupture, it was decided to administer preoperative imatinib. The patient had an excellent clinical and radiological response. Her dysphagia gradually resolved and the follow-up CT scans of the first 10 months showed a gradually reducing tumour size to 54 mm × 33 mm × 42 mm. The patient underwent an uneventful laparoscopic-assisted Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy. Postoperatively, the patient continued with adjuvant imatinib. At the last follow-up, 1 year from operation and 38 months from the diagnosis, the patient is disease free.

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: is tumoral enucleation a viable therapeutic option?

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of surgical enucleation of esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (E-GISTs). Secondary objectives evaluated (i) the impact of tumor enucleation on oncological outcomes, (ii) the effect of pretherapeutic biopsy on the feasibility of E-GIST enucleation, and (iii) the impact of mucosal ulceration on outcome.

BACKGROUND

E-GISTs are very rare tumors and esophageal resection has been the recommended approach. The feasibility and impact on outcomes of tumor enucleation are unknown.

METHODS

Through a large national multicenter retrospective study, 19 patients with E-GISTs were identified between 2001 and 2010. Patients who underwent either enucleation or esophagectomy were compared.

RESULTS

Of over 19 patients identified with E-GISTs, curative treatment was surgical for 16 patients, with enucleation in 8 and esophagectomy in 8. In the enucleation group, median tumoral diameter was 40 mm (18-65 mm), without any mucosal ulceration, preoperative capsular ruptures, or incomplete resections. In the esophagectomy group, the median tumoral diameter was 85 mm (55-250 mm), with mucosal ulceration in 4 patients, preoperative capsular rupture in 1, and no incomplete resections. Severe postoperative complication rates were 50% and 25% in the esophagectomy and enucleation groups, respectively, with 2 postoperative deaths after esophagectomy. After a median follow-up of 6.4 years, 2 recurrences were observed after esophagectomy versus 0 after enucleation. Endoscopic biopsies did not expose patients to complications or local recurrence after enucleation. Endoscopic mucosal ulceration was associated with more aggressive tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

E-GIST enucleation seems safe for tumors of less than 65 mm in diameter.

Benign esophageal tumors

Benign esophageal and paraesophageal masses and cysts are a rare but important group of pathologies. Although often asymptomatic, these lesions can cause a variety of symptoms and, in some cases, demonstrate variable biological behavior. Contemporary categorization relies heavily on endoscopic ultrasound and other imaging modalities and immunohistochemical analysis when appropriate. Minimally invasive options including endoscopic, laparoscopic, and thoracoscopic methods are increasingly used for symptomatic or indeterminate lesions.

Oesophageal GIST-A rare breed case report and review of the literature

•

We present a case of oesophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST).

•

GISTs in the oesophagus are rare (5%) and their management is surrounded by debate.

•

Surgical therapy should aim for complete resection.

•

Preoperative biopsies are best to be avoided as they might propagate seeding.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) account for only one percent of all gastrointestinal malignancies.

Presentation of case

A 53 year old lady presented to the gastroenterology clinic with iron deficiency anaemia. Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) and computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a non-obstructing 7 cm submucosal oesophageal lesion. An oesophagectomy was performed and subsequent histology sections showed a well-circumscribed spindle cell tumour without any cellular atypia. Immunohistochemistry on the tumour was negative for S100 and positive for smooth muscle actin and desmin. C-kit (CD117) showed focal positivity in some of the tumour cells and the overall features were of a gastro-intestinal stromal tumour (GIST).

The patient has been fully compliant with the follow-up arrangements and is disease-free six years after her original operation.

Discussion

GISTs are mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that express the KIT protein. The incidence rate for GIST is 15 cases to one million in the USA.

GISTs in the oesophagus are rare (5%) and their management is surrounded by some debate.

Once the diagnosis has been secured the patient should be evaluated for suitability for surgical resection.

Optimal surgical therapy should aim to achieve complete resection, if possible, without injury to the pseudocapsule surrounding the tumour. Meticulous atraumatic surgical technique is necessary and preoperative biopsies are best to be avoided as they might propagate seeding.

Conclusions

Oesophagectomy with clear resection margins should be the preferred method for surgical treatment combined with the use of novel TKI strategies.

Retrospective analysis of thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal submucosal tumors

Background

Surgical enucleation is the treatment of choice for esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs) with symptomatic, larger, or ill-defined lesions. The enucleation of SMTs has traditionally been performed via thoracotomy. However, minimally invasive approaches have recently been introduced and successfully applied. In this study, we present our experiences with the thoracotomic and thoracoscopic approaches to treating SMTs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 53 patients with SMTs who underwent surgical enucleation between August 1996 and July 2013. Demographic and clinical features, tumor-related factors, the surgical approach, and outcomes were analyzed.

Results

There were 36 males (67.9%) and 17 females (32.1%); the mean age was 49.2±11.8 years (range, 16 to 79 years). Histology revealed leiomyoma in 51 patients, a gastrointestinal stromal tumor in one patient, and schwannoma in one patient. Eighteen patients (34.0%) were symptomatic. Fourteen patients underwent a planned thoracotomic enucleation. Of the 39 patients for whom a thoracoscopic approach was planned, six patients required conversion to thoracotomy because of overly small tumors or poor visualization in five patients and accidental mucosal injury in one patient. No mortality or major postoperative complications occurred. Compared to thoracotomy, the thoracoscopic approach had a slightly shorter operation time, but this difference was not statistically significant (120.0±45.6 minutes vs. 161.5±71.1 minutes, p=0.08). A significant difference was found in the length of the hospital stay (9.0±3.2 days vs. 16.5±5.4 days, p<0.001).

Conclusion

The thoracoscopic enucleation of submucosal esophageal tumors is safe and is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay compared to thoracotomic approaches.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) at uncommon locations: a large population based analysis

INTRODUCTION

Sparse information is available about GISTs in uncommon locations. Our large database analysis aims to determine the characteristics of GISTs in the esophagus, colon and rectum and compare to gastric GISTs.

METHODS

The Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was queried from 1990 to 2009 using CS SCHEMA v0203. Characteristics of each location were compared to gastric GISTs.

RESULTS

4411 GIST (29 esophageal, 2658 stomach, 1463 small intestine, 126 colonic, and 135 rectal) from 1990 to 2009 were identified. Univariate and multivariate predictors of worse disease specific survival in both the entire cohort and surgical resection group include older age, male gender, tumor size > 5 cm, no surgical intervention and anatomical location. Although less likely to undergo surgical resection, esophageal GIST (all patients and resected) had a comparable survival to gastric GIST. A higher proportion of colonic GISTs presented with distant disease and had a worse disease specific survival when compared to rectal GISTs.

CONCLUSION

Our results show a rising incidence in GISTs and highlight the characteristics of GISTs based on anatomical location. In addition, this is the first study to demonstrate that colonic GISTs behave differently when compared to rectal GISTs and warrants further prospective evaluation.

Single-center experience of surgically resected gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A report of six cases, including a rare case involving the lower esophagus

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare, but remain the most common GI mesenchymal neoplasms. In the present study, six cases of GIST are reported, and one of these cases, a patient with esophageal GIST, is reported in-depth. Certain recent developments in the clinical therapy of GISTs are also discussed. The records of all surgically-resected GI stromal tumors treated at the Al-Hada Military Hospital between January 2007 and December 2012 were reviewed. There were six cases of surgically resected GISTs during this time period, three males and three females, with a mean age of 69.3±16.4 years. The stomach was involved in 66.7% of cases, the small intestine in 16.7% and the esophagus, which is an extremely rare site, in 16.7% of cases. The most common symptom at presentation was abdominal pain, followed by GI bleeding. The mean tumor size was 8.7±6.3 cm. Surgery was indicated by the presence of the aforementioned symptoms or a tumor size >5 cm. All tumors were completely resected with histologically negative margins. The diagnoses were established by immunohistochemistry. Four patients were classified as possessing a high-grade variant, and were administered with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Following a mean follow up of 31 months, no recurrence or mortality was detected. Complete surgical resection with tumor-free margins is the standard treatment for GISTs, and TKIs should be used as adjuvant therapy if the risk of progressive disease is high.

A large esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor that was successfully resected after neoadjuvant imatinib treatment: case report

A 49-year-old man was admitted to our hospital with a 1-month history of dysphagia. An upper endoscopy revealed a lower esophageal submucosal tumor. Immunohistochemical staining of the biopsy specimen revealed KIT positivity. Thus, the tumor was diagnosed as a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). After 6 months of imatinib treatment, the tumor decreased from 92 mm × 55 mm × 80 mm to 65 mm × 35 mm × 55 mm in diameter, and surgery was performed. The tumor was completely resected without rupture, by partial esophagogastric resection through a thoracotomy incision, using an abdominal laparoscopic approach. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the tumor was negative for c-kit but positive for CD34. Genetic examination showed that the tumor had a mutation in exon 11. The patient experienced minor leakage but recovered conservatively. Adjuvant imatinib was initiated 64 days after surgery. We report this rare case to show the potential of preoperative imatinib treatment in patients with large esophageal GISTs, to achieve complete resection without rupture.

Enucleation of esophageal submucosal tumors: a single institution's experience

BACKGROUND

Esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs) are usually benign, and surgical enucleation is widely accepted as the treatment of choice. The goals of this study were to investigate the surgical outcomes after enucleation of esophageal SMTs and to establish the feasibility of video-assisted thoracoscopic enucleation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 87 patients who underwent enucleation of esophageal SMTs between 1995 and 2011 at Samsung Medical Center.

RESULTS

There were 59 men and 28 women in the study group, with a mean age of 43.3 years (range, 20-73 years). Fifty-eight (67%) patients were asymptomatic. Among the remaining patients, the most common symptom was dysphagia (n=12). Transthoracic approaches were used in 79 patients, including 63 patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic enucleation. Transabdominal approaches were performed in 8 patients. Pathologic diagnosis included leiomyoma (n=78 [89.7%]), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (n=5 [5.7%]), schwannoma (n=3 [3.4%]), and hemangioma (n=1 [1.1%]). The thoracoscopic enucleation group had a significantly shorter median hospital stay compared with the thoracotomy groups (5 versus 6 days; p=0.013). Overall, there were 2 postoperative leaks, including in 1 patient who underwent reoperation after enucleation. With the exception of 2 patients, there was no other major complications. One patient underwent esophagectomy for tumor recurrence after enucleation of GISTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, surgical outcomes were excellent after enucleation. The thoracoscopic approach was feasible for most patients and was correlated with a shorter hospital stay. However, careful management is warranted after enucleation of GISTs considering the recurrence risk.

Esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: diagnostic complexity and management pitfalls

Introduction. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the esophagus are rare. Case Presentation. This is a case of a 50-year-old male patient who was referred to our department complaining of atypical chest pain. A chest computed tomographic scan and endoscopic ultrasound revealed a submucosal esophageal tumor measuring 5 cm in its largest diameter. Suspecting a leiomyoma, we performed enucleation via right thoracotomy. The pathology report yielded a diagnosis of an esophageal gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The patient has shown no evidence of recurrence one year postoperatively. Conclusions. This report illustrates the complexity and dilemmas inherent in diagnosing and treating esophageal GISTs.

Rare presentation of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor with spontaneous esophageal perforation: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the alimentary canal are malignant tumors with <1% of cases diagnosed in esophagus. These cases require special consideration given their close proximity to vital structures and propensity to be highly aggressive. Management of patients with GISTs has been transformed since the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this report, we present an unusual case of GIST with spontaneous esophageal perforation.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 39-year-old Caucasian male presented to our hospital with complaints of severe chest and abdominal pain. A diagnostic chest radiograph revealed a moderate right-sided pleural effusion. Subsequently, an esophagram demonstrated a perforation proximal to an elongated stricture in the distal esophagus. A left thoracotomy was performed whereby a large mediastinal mass firmly attached to the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction was encountered. The neoplasm involved proximal one-third of the stomach and perforated into the right hemithorax. Histopathological evaluation of the tumor led to a diagnosis of GIST.

DISCUSSION

GISTs of the gastroesophageal junction are uncommon and may rarely present with esophageal perforation. The standard of care for treating GIST at present includes tyrosine kinase inhibitors. This pharmacologic agent, along with improved surgical techniques and understanding of molecular markers for accurate diagnosis, will assuredly continue to improve overall survival of patients with GISTs.

CONCLUSION

When stricture or achalasia is detected on imaging, GIST should be considered in the differential diagnosis for individual patients. Additionally, chest and abdomen CT scans of may be performed to confirm presence of a tumor mass, thereby ruling out achalasia.

The role of surgery in the multidisciplinary management of patients with localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Surgical resection of localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is associated with recurrence rates of approximately 50% at 5 years of follow-up. The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as imatinib, improved overall survival rates in advanced disease, while in the adjuvant setting, improved recurrence-free survival following resection of high-risk GIST. The demonstration of the clinical benefit of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings generated interest in neoadjuvant approaches for patients with operable locally advanced disease, particularly in difficult anatomic locations. The potential impact of tumor downsizing in areas such as the gastroesophageal junction, the duodenum or the rectum, on the extent of surgical resection and morbidity is real. The ongoing research regarding neoadjuvant therapy, the duration of adjuvant therapy and the optimal means by which to risk stratify patients with GIST continues to keep the treatment of this disease at the forefront of personalized cancer care.

Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the posterior mediastinum

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. GISTs are predominant in the stomach and intestine, and rarely occur in the oesophagus. A GIST in the posterior mediastinum usually arises from the oesophagus, but single case of gastric GIST in the posterior mediastinum is reported. We present a case of a posterior mediastinal malignant GIST which was likely of gastric origin. The patient had no recurrence for 5 years after a complete resection.

Special considerations in pediatric gastrointestinal tumors

Pediatric gastrointestinal tumors are rare in children but are being increasingly recognized. These tumors have distinct biologic and clinical feature that are different from those observed in adults. This review highlights the biological and clinical characteristics of pediatric GIST and provides diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for the management these unique and challenging group of tumors.

Surgical options for localized and advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors

The development of imitinab has led to a revolution in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), but surgical resection remains the cornerstone of treatment for patients with localized disease. The principles to surgical treatment of GIST include careful handling of tissues to prevent tumor rupture and resection to negative margins without the need for wide excision. Minimally invasive techniques have proven equally efficacious provided appropriate oncologic resections are performed.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): an updated experience

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are relatively common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive tract characterized by c-KIT mutations. This is a comprehensive review of the current data of the literature on the various aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of these tumors.

METHODS

The stomach is the most commonly involved site for these tumors in the digestive tract. Computed tomography and endoscopy can usually establish the diagnosis. The study of certain specific immunohistochemical markers may contribute to better characterization of these tumors.

RESULTS

Surgical resection of GISTs has been the most effective therapy. In addition, targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may reduce the development of recurrence or decrease the disease progression in patients with metastatic disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has resulted in significant improvement in the overall prognosis of these patients. Furthermore, preoperative imatinib can decrease tumor volume and is associated with complete surgical resection in locally advanced primary GISTs.