Bicuspid aortic valve: about natural history of ascending aorta aneurysms

Relationship between indexed aortic area and aortic diameter in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening complication of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy. In these populations, whilst prophylactic replacement of proximal thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is generally recommended at threshold diameters ≥5.5 cm, dissection may occur in smaller aortas. An alternative size-based parameter, the cross-sectional aortic area/patient height ratio (indexed aortic area, IAA), correlates with increased dissection risk at abnormal values > 10 cm²/m. We sought to assess the utility of the IAA in identifying at-risk BAV-associated TAAs with abnormal IAA, albeit with sub-threshold aortic diameter.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified 69 patients with BAV-associated TAAs who underwent surgical repair between 2010 and 2016. Aortic diameter was measured on pre-operative imaging, and IAA calculated, at the mid-sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta for each patient. We determined proportions of aneurysms with IAA >10 cm²/m, median IAAs corresponding to aortic diameters <4.0 cm, 4.0-4.5 cm, 4.5-5.0 cm, 5.0-5.5 cm and >5.5 cm, and median aortic diameters corresponding to an abnormal IAA.

Results

50.9%, 12.5% and 64.6% of aneurysms at the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. 51.9% and 88.9% of patients with aortic diameter 4.5-5.0 cm and 5.0-5.5 cm, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. In aneurysms with abnormal IAA involving the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction, and mid-ascending aorta, median aortic diameters were 4.98 cm, 5.04 cm and 5.11 cm, respectively. Overall, 57/72 (79.2%) at-risk aneurysms with IAA >10 cm²/m had diameters smaller than the 5.5 cm guideline cut-off for surgical intervention.

Conclusion

Significant proportions of BAV-associated TAAs are at increased risk of aortic dissection attending an IAA >10 cm²/m, whilst not fulfilling the size criteria indicating aortic surgery in contemporary guidelines. Further analysis of IAA in larger BAV cohorts is necessary to clarify its role in patient selection and optimal timing for prophylactic aortic replacement.

Current indications for surgical repair in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aortic ectasia

Preventive surgical repair of the moderately dilated ascending aorta/aortic root in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is controversial. Most international reference centers are currently proposing a proactive approach for BAV patients with a maximum ascending aortic/root diameter of 45 mm since the risk of dissection/rupture raises significantly with an aneurysm diameter >50 mm. Current guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the joint guidelines of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) recommend elective repair in symptomatic patients with dysfunctional BAV (aortic diameter ≥45 mm). In asymptomatic patients with a well-functioning BAV, elective repair is recommended for diameters ≥50 mm, or if the aneurysm is rapidly progressing (rate of 5 mm/year), or in case of a strong family history of dissection/rupture/sudden death, or with planned pregnancy. As diameter is likely not the most reliable predictor of rupture and dissection and the majority of BAV patients may never experience an aortic catastrophe at small diameters, an overly aggressive approach almost certainly will put some patients with BAV unnecessarily at risk of operative and early mortality. This paper discusses the indications for preventive, elective repair of the aortic root, and ascending aorta in patients with a BAV and a moderately dilated—or ectatic—ascending aorta.