Human Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Valve-in-a-Valve Implantation

Renal function changes associated with transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve for prosthetic regurgitation compared to stenosis

Background

Renal dysfunction is frequently encountered in patients with aortic prosthesis degeneration requiring valve-in-valve (VIV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The effect of VIV TAVR on renal function in patients with bioprosthetic aortic regurgitation (AR) and stenosis (AS) is unknown.

Objectives

The aims of this study were to describe the change in renal function after VIV TAVR and to compare differences in renal function changes in those with predominant prosthetic regurgitation compared to stenosis.

Methods

All VIV TAVR between June of 2014, and October 2019 (n = 141) at a single institution were reviewed. Baseline renal function parameters including estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were compared with post-discharge follow-up values in both prosthetic AR and AS patient groups. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine correlates of renal function change.

Results

Mean baseline eGFR was lower in the AR group (55 SD21 vs. 64 SD24 ml/min/1.73 m² p = 0.0495). At post-discharge follow-up there was an increase in mean eGFR in the AR group which was not present in the AS group (8 SD12 vs. 0 SD11 ml/min/1.73 m² respectively p = 0.0006). There were strong correlations between change in creatinine (β = −0.57, R² = 0.64, p < 0.0001) and BUN (β = −0.61, R² = 0.51, p < 0.0001), and pre-procedure values in the AR group.

Conclusions

Patients who underwent VIV TAVR for AR experienced significant improvement of renal function at post-discharge follow-up. More advanced renal dysfunction at baseline was associated with greater improvement in renal function at post discharge in AR patients.

Valve-in-valve prosthesis-late morphological findings

Since its implantation in 2002, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the preferred intervention for patients with severe aortic stenosis and significant co-morbidities. In 2007, it was adopted as a rescue procedure for failed bioprosthetic valves, now known as the valve-in-valve (VIV) procedure. Unlike other modes of treatment with a multitude of phase 4 post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data, use of these valves have increased rapidly even without long term durability data on this procedure and the near lack of information on the pathology of failed transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) bioprosthesis and especially after the VIV procedure. We present a case of a late explanted VIV bioprosthesis (ten (10) years post-initial aortic valve replacement and five (5) years post-VIV procedure) in a 65-year-old male with multiple morphologic findings. Further availability of standardized morphologic data from explanted bioprosthetic valves is essential to aid in understanding the pathophysiology of tissue degeneration of the TAVI valve, and ultimately to improve patient outcomes by identifying possible early interventional strategies.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration

Surgical aortic valve replacement is the gold standard procedure to treat patients with severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis or insufficiency. Bioprosthetic valves are used for surgical aortic valve replacement with a much greater prevalence than mechanical valves. However, bioprosthetic valves may fail over time because of structural valve deterioration; this often requires intervention due to severe bioprosthetic valve stenosis or regurgitation or a combination of both. In select patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement. Transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV) replacement is performed by implanting a transcatheter heart valve within a failing bioprosthetic valve. The transcatheter ViV operation is a less invasive procedure compared with reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement, but it has been associated with specific complications and requires extensive preoperative work-up and planning by the heart team. Data from experimental studies and analyses of results from clinical procedures have led to strategies to improve outcomes of these procedures. The type, size, and implant position of the transcatheter valve can be optimized for individual patients with knowledge of detailed dimensions of the surgical valve and radiographic and echocardiographic measurements of the patient's anatomy. Understanding the complexities of the ViV procedure can lead surgeons to make choices during the original surgical valve implantation that can make a future ViV operation more technically feasible years before it is required.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a Sapien 3 Commander 20 mm valves in patients with degenerated 19 mm bioprosthetic aortic valve

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve has been successfully performed as an alternative to surgery. We describe our initial experience of valve-in-valve TAVI in five patients, using new generation Edwards Sapien 3 transcatheter heart valves implanted into degenerated 19 mm bioprosthetic valves. 20-mm Edwards S3 valves were offered for compassionate use. All patients had significant aortic valve stenosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The main vascular access was achieved and pre-closed with two Proglide closure devices in one patient and Prostar closure devices in four patients. For each TAVI procedure an Edwards 14 French sheath was inserted without complication and sutured in place. The Sapien 3 Commander delivery system was inserted and the valve was aligned in the descending aorta. The 20-mm Sapien 3 valve was deployed with slow continuous inflation during rapid right ventricular pacing. The cranial edge of the Edwards S3 valve was aligned with the cranial radiopaque markers of bioprosthesis to minimize paravalvular leak. Post-deployment angiography, transesophageal echocardiography and aortogram confirmed absence of mild aortic insufficiency and no increase in trans-aortic gradient when compared to a naïve 19 mm bioprosthetic valve.

CONCLUSION

Valve-in-valve TAVI with the Edwards S3 transcatheter heart valve for degenerative bioprosthetic aortic valves is technically feasible. The proper position of the stented valve minimizes the risk for post-procedure paravalvular insufficiency and provides good transaortic pressure gradient. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve-in-Valve Replacement with an Edwards Sapien 3 Valve

A few case reports and case series have documented the outcomes in patients with tricuspid bioprosthetic valvular degeneration who underwent transcatheter implantation of the Medtronic Melody and the Edwards Sapien XT and Sapien 3 valves. In this report, we describe the case of a 49-year-old woman with severe bioprosthetic tricuspid valvular stenosis and multiple comorbidities who underwent transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with a Sapien 3 valve.

Valve-in-Valve Therapy for Failed Surgical Bioprosthetic Valves: Clinical Results and Procedural Guidance

With improved life expectancy and increased use of bioprosthetic heart valves, more elderly and frail patients present with degenerative surgical heart valve disease. The valve-in-valve procedure is an attractive alternative to a conventional open redo procedure. Although it is a novel extension of established transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis in a high-risk population, it is gaining momentum worldwide, particularly for aortic and mitral positions. Success depends on the operator being familiar with emerging transcatheter heart valve technology and morphology as well as that of the existing surgical heart valve, patient selection, accurate sizing, an ideal implantation position.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation: a systematic review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become an alternative to open surgery in those deemed high risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and outcomes of this emerging procedure. We have examined available literature to provide an overview of valve-in-valve implantation using transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in aortic, mitral, pulmonary, tricuspid positions.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Web of Science.

RESULTS

Only 61 studies met full criteria and were included the review. This included 31 studies reporting transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation, mitral valve-in-valve implantation (13 studies), tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation (12 studies), and pure native aortic valve regurgitation (nine studies). One of the limitations of this review is that most of the studies included were case reports, together with some case series.

CONCLUSION

Valve-in-valve implantation can be considered as an acceptable alternative to conventional open heart surgery for elderly high-risk surgical patients with bioprosthetic degeneration. Long-term follow-up of treated patients will be necessary to establish the true role of valve-in-valve implantation for bioprosthetic degeneration. Patients should be evaluated on an individual basis until outcomes are proven in large cohort studies or randomised trials.

Transcatheter aortic "valve-in-valve" for degenerated bioprostheses: Choosing the right TAVI valve

Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement is the treatment of choice for patients over 65 years of age suffering from aortic valve disease, and for younger patients with contraindications to long-lasting anticoagulation. Despite several technical improvements to reduce the risk of structural valve degeneration (SVD), the risk of SVD still exists, in particular for hemodialysis patients and patients under 60 years of age at surgery. Redo open heart surgery is the treatment of choice in case of valve degeneration, but caries a higher surgical risk when elderly patients with comorbidities are concerned. In the last 5 years, transcatheter aortic "valve-in-valve" procedures represent a valid alternative to standard redo surgery in selected patients. Valve-in-valve procedures represent a less invasive approach in high-risk patients and the published results are very encouraging. Technical success rates of 100% have been reported, as have the absence of paravalvular leaks, acceptable trans-valvular gradients (depending on the size of the original bioprosthesis), and low complication rates. The current article focuses on choosing the correct transcutaneous valve to match the patient's existing bioprosthesis for valve-in-valve procedures.

Current status and future perspectives of prosthetic valve selection for aortic valve replacement

Aortic valve abnormality is the most frequent form of valvular heart disease. Notably, aortic stenosis in the elderly population has been increasingly common. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) using prosthetic valve has been still believed as a gold standard surgical intervention for various types of diseased aortic valve. The numerous reports and studies evaluating the clinical outcomes and durability of prosthesis were revealed, however, prosthesis selection for AVR is still debated. In twenty-first century, paradigm shift of prosthesis preference might be emerged from mechanical valves to bioprosthesis due to the development of the technology. Moreover, transcatheter aortic valve implantation accelerated among the worldwide trends. It could be developed having the potential to reduce the mortality and morbidity associated with high-risk traditional AVR. After the current guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease, we should consider the valve choice in various patients' profile setting. This review summarizes the current status of prosthesis selection and future perspectives of ideal aortic valve intervention, including minimal invasive care.

Valve-in-Valve Implantation of Medtronic CoreValve Prosthesis in Patients with Failing Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves

Background—

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) system might represent an alternative to conventional redo surgery in older high-risk patients with a failing aortic valve bioprosthesis.

Methods and Results—

Symptomatic patients with failing aortic valve bioprosthesis, aged ≥65 years with a logistic EuroSCORE ≥10 % were considered for treatment. Local anesthesia was used to retrogradely implant the MCV system into the failing bioprosthetic valve. Clinical events were recorded and a transthoracic echocardiography was performed to evaluate the impact of MCV on hemodynamics after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A total of 27 patients (aged 74.8±8 years, logistic EuroSCORE of 31±17%) were treated. In those with AS and AS and AR (n=25), the mean gradient declined from 42±16 mm Hg before to 18±8 mm Hg after MCV implantation ( P <0.001), in those with AR the level declined by 2. There was no intraprocedural death and no procedural myocardial infarction. On the basis of the definitions of the Valvular Academic Research Consortium, the rate of major stroke was 7.4 %, of life-threatening bleeding 7.4%, of kidney failure stage III 7.4%, and of major access site complication 11.1 %, respectively. Within 30 days after the procedure, 2 patients died; 1 from stroke and 1 from cardiac failure (30-day mortality: 7.4%).

Conclusions—

These results suggest that transfemoral MCV implantation into a wide range of degenerated aortic bioprosthetic valves—irrespective of the failure mode—is feasible, safe, and improves hemodynamics in older patients with higher risk for conventional aortic valve redo surgery.

Direct transatrial transcatheter SAPIEN valve implantation through right minithoracotomy in a degenerated mitral bioprosthetic valve

Transcatheter valve implantation into failing surgical mitral bioprosthetic valves have been reported. This strategy avoids performing high-risk repeat cardiac surgery in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. All these patients have been treated by a transapical approach. We report a case of failing bioprosthetic mitral valve in an 82-year-old woman successfully treated with a 29-mm Edwards SAPIEN balloon expandable bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) with direct left atrial approach through a right anterior thoracotomy. Our experience demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of this approach. Therefore, mitral valve-in-surgical valve implantation may be a viable treatment alternative in carefully selected patients.

Melody valve-in-ring procedure for mitral valve replacement: feasibility in four annuloplasty types

BACKGROUND

The recurrence of regurgitation after surgical mitral valve (MV) repair remains a significant clinical problem. Mitral annuloplasty rings are commonly used in MV repair procedures. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of transvenous valve-in-ring (VIR) implantation using the Melody valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), which is a valved-stent designed for percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement, and 4 distinct types of annuloplasty ring (AR) in an ovine model.

METHODS

Ten sheep underwent surgical MV annuloplasty ring placement (n=10): CE-Physio, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA [n=5]; partial ring [n=3]; flexible ring [n=1]; and saddle ring [n=1]). All animals underwent cardiac catheterization, hemodynamic assessment, and Melody VIR implantation through a transfemoral venous, transatrial septal approach 1 week after surgery. Follow-up hemodynamic, angiographic, and echocardiographic data were recorded.

RESULTS

Melody VIR implantation was technically successful in all but 1 animal. In this animal a 26-mm partial AR proved too large for secure anchoring of the Melody valve. In the remaining 9 animals, fluoroscopy showed the Melody devices securely positioned within the annuloplasty rings. Echocardiography revealed no perivalvular leak, and angiography revealed no left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, vigorous left ventricular function, and no aortic valve insufficiency. The median procedure time was 55.5 (range, 45 to 78) minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the feasibility of a purely percutaneous approach to MV replacement in patients with preexisting annuloplasty rings, regardless of ring type. This approach may be of particular benefit to patients with failed repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Antegrade percutaneous valve implantation for mitral ring dysfunction, a challenging case

The operative risk for reoperation of degenerated bioprosthetic valves or failing mitral-valve annuloplasty is higher compared with the risks for first isolated native valve repair or replacement (Astor et al., Eur Heart J 2008;29:2382-2387). In the presence of comorbidities, these risks increase exponentially. The recent introduction of transcatheter valve implantation opened new perspectives for the treatment of patients at very high surgical risk. We report a percutaneous mitral valve (MV) implantation using a transatrial approach within a MV ring using the Edwars Sapien XT valve.

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves

OBJECTIVES

We sought to analyze outcomes of patients with degenerated surgically implanted bioprosthetic heart valves undergoing valve-in-valve (viv) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

BACKGROUND

Redo cardiac surgery for degenerated bioprosthetic heart valves is associated with increased risks, particular in elderly patients with comorbidities. For these patients, TAVI may be an attractive, less invasive treatment option.

METHODS

Data from 47 patients age 64 to 97 years (logistic euroSCORE: 35.0 ± 18.5%) undergoing transfemoral (n = 25) or transapical (n = 22) viv-TAVI for failed bioprosthetic aortic valves 113 ± 65 months after initial surgery at 9 clinical sites in Germany and Switzerland were analyzed.

RESULTS

Valve-in-valve TAVI was technically successful in all patients, with 2 patients requiring bailout implantation of a second TAVI prosthesis for severe regurgitation during the procedure. There was 1 procedural death as the result of low-output failure. Valvular function after viv-TAVI was excellent with respect to valve competence, but increased transvalvular gradients ≥20 mm Hg were noted in 44% of patients. Vascular access complications occurred in 6 (13%) patients, and 5 (11%) patients required new pacemaker implantation after viv-TAVI. Renal failure requiring dialysis occurred in 4 (9%) patients. Mortality at 30 days was 17% (1 procedural and 7 post-procedural deaths), with 3 of 8 fatalities the result of non-valve-related septic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Valve-in-valve TAVI can be performed with high technical success rates, acceptable post-procedural valvular function, and excellent functional improvement. However, in these predominantly elderly high-risk patients with multiple comorbidities, viv-TAVI was associated with 17% mortality, often because of septic complications arising in the post-operative phase.

Percutaneous transvenous Melody valve-in-ring procedure for mitral valve replacement

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of percutaneous transvenous mitral valve-in-ring (VIR) implantation using the Melody valve in an ovine model.

BACKGROUND

The recurrence of mitral regurgitation following surgical mitral valve (MV) repair in both adult and pediatric patients remains a significant clinical problem. Mitral annuloplasty rings are commonly used in MV repair procedures and may serve as secure landing zones for percutaneous valves.

METHODS

Five sheep underwent surgical MV annuloplasty (24 mm, n = 2; 26 mm, n = 2; 28 mm, n = 1). Animals underwent cardiac catheterization with VIR implantation via a transfemoral venous, transatrial septal approach 1 week following surgery. Hemodynamic, angiographic, and echocardiographic data were recorded before and after VIR.

RESULTS

VIR was technically successful and required <1 h of procedure time in all animals. Fluoroscopy demonstrated securely positioned Melody valves within the annuloplasty ring in all animals. Angiography revealed no significant MV regurgitation in 4 and moderate central MV regurgitation in the animal with the 28-mm annuloplasty. All animals demonstrated vigorous left ventricular function, no outflow tract obstruction, and no aortic valve insufficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the feasibility of a purely percutaneous approach to MV replacement in patients with preexisting annuloplasty rings. This novel approach may be of particular benefit to patients with failed repair of ischemic mitral regurgitation and in pediatric patients with complex structural heart disease.

Transarterial Medtronic CoreValve System Implantation for Degenerated Surgically Implanted Aortic Prostheses

Background—

To assess the results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Medtronic CoreValve System (MCS), through the transarterial approach, in high-risk patients with degenerated surgically implanted aortic bioprostheses (SP).

Methods and Results—

Of 241 patients who underwent TAVI, 10 (4%) had a degenerated SP. The approach was percutaneous transfemoral in 9 cases and surgical transaxillary in 1. Patients were age 75±10 years of age. All were in New York Heart Association classes III or IV and at high risk for repeated surgery. Seven patients had stented, 2 stentless, and 1 homograft SP. The failure mode was predominant regurgitation in 7 cases and stenosis (aortic valve area, 0.7±0.2 cm 2 ; mean gradient, 58±16 mm Hg) in 3. Based on the echographic measurements, 8 patients received a 26-mm, and 2 a 29-mm-diameter MCS. Procedural success rate was 100%. There was 1 in-hospital death, 1 stroke with moderate sequelae, and 1 pacemaker implantation. There were no other adverse events at 30 days. The mean postimplantation transprosthetic gradient was 13±7 mm Hg; periprosthetic regurgitation was absent or trivial in 9 cases and grade 2 in 1. After a median follow-up of 5 months, there were no additional adverse events. All but 1 of the hospital survivors were in New York Heart Association classes I or II.

Conclusions—

These results suggest that transarterial MCS implantation in degenerated SP is feasible and may lead to hemodynamic and clinical improvement in patients who are poor candidates for repeated surgery, pending confirmation in larger series with longer follow-up.

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation for failing bioprosthetic valves

Transcatheter valve implantation is becoming an alternative to conventional surgical valve replacement in patients at high surgical risk. While experience and acceptance with transcatheter techniques increased rapidly, transcatheter valve implantation within failing bioprostheses has emerged as a new concept (valve-in-valve implantation). Currently, the majority of prostheses implanted in patients are bioprosthetic valves that are expected to degenerate over time. Valve-in-valve implantation provides great utility in high-operative-risk patients since the mortality risk for reoperation can be significantly higher than for first-time isolated valve replacement. Although two current devices are CE Mark approved in Europe for implantation within native valves, off-label clinical implementation of valve-in-valve have been described in numerous case reports. In this article, we provide an overview of transcatheter valve implantation in failing bioprostheses with an emphasis on the aortic position.