Effect of Diastolic Dysfunction on Early Outcomes During Elective Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Prospective Observational Study

Poor Agreement Between Preoperative Transthoracic Echocardiography and Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography for Grading Diastolic Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Guidelines for the evaluation and grading of diastolic dysfunction are available for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is used for this purpose intraoperatively but the level of agreement between these 2 imaging modalities for grading diastolic dysfunction is unknown. We assessed agreement between awake preoperative TTE and intraoperative TEE for grading diastolic dysfunction.

METHODS

In 98 patients undergoing cardiac surgery, key Doppler measurements were obtained using TTE and TEE at the following time points: TTE before anesthesia induction (TTEawake), TTE following anesthesia induction (TTEanesth), and TEE following anesthesia induction (TEEanesth). The primary endpoint was grade of diastolic dysfunction categorized by a simplified algorithm, and measured by TTEawake and TEEanesth, for which the weighted κ statistic assessed observed agreement beyond chance. Secondary endpoints were peak early diastolic lateral mitral annular tissue velocity (e'lat) and the ratio of peak early diastolic mitral inflow velocity (E) to e'lat (E/e'lat), measured by TTEawake and TEEanesth, were compared using Bland-Altman limits of agreement.

RESULTS

Disagreement in grading diastolic dysfunction by ≥1 grade occurred in 43 (54%) of 79 patients and by ≥2 grades in 8 (10%) patients with paired measurements for analysis, yielding a weighted κ of 0.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-0.51) for the observed level of agreement beyond chance. Bland-Altman analysis of paired data for e'lat and E/e'lat demonstrated a mean difference (95% CI) of 0.51 (-0.06 to 1.09) and 0.70 (0.07-1.34), respectively, for measurements made by TTEawake compared to TEEanesth. The percentage (95% CI) of paired measurements for e'lat and E/e'lat that lay outside the [-2, +2] study-specified boundary of acceptable agreement was 36% (27%-48%) and 39% (29%-51%), respectively. Results were generally robust to sensitivity analyses, including comparing measurements between TTEawake and TTEanesth, between TTEanesth and TEEanesth, and after regrading diastolic dysfunction by the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)/European Association of CardioVascular Imaging (EACVI) algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

There was poor agreement between TTEawake and TEEanesth for grading diastolic dysfunction by a simplified algorithm, with disagreement by ≥1 grade in 54% and by ≥2 grades in 10% of the evaluable cohort. Future studies, including comparing the prognostic utility of TTEawake and TEEanesth for clinically important adverse outcomes that may be a consequence of diastolic dysfunction, are needed to understand whether this disagreement reflects random variability in Doppler variables, misclassification by the changed technique and physiological conditions of intraoperative TEE, or the accurate detection of a clinically relevant change in diastolic dysfunction.

Managing Diastolic Dysfunction Perioperatively

Preoperative cardiac evaluation is a cornerstone of the practice of anesthesiology. This consists of a thorough history and physical attempting to elucidate signs and symptoms of heart failure, angina or anginal equivalents, and valvular heart disease. Current guidelines rarely recommend preoperative echocardiography in the setting of an adequate functional capacity. Many patients may have poor functional capacity and/or have medical history such that echocardiographic data is available for review. Much focus is often placed on evaluating major valvular abnormalities and systolic function as measured by ejection fraction, but a key impactful component is often overlooked-diastolic function. A diagnosis of diastolic heart failure is an independent predictor of mortality and is not uncommon in patients with normal systolic function. This narrative review addresses the clinical relevance and management of diastolic dysfunction in the perioperative setting.

The Long-Term Impact of Diastolic Dysfunction After Routine Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of diastolic dysfunction (DD) on survival after routine cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

This was an observational study of consecutive cardiac surgeries from 2010 to 2021.

SETTING

At a single institution.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients undergoing isolated coronary, isolated valvular, and concomitant coronary and valvular surgery were included. Patients with a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) longer than 6 months prior to their index surgery were excluded from the analysis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were categorized via preoperative TTE as having no DD, grade I DD, grade II DD, or grade III DD.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 8,682 patients undergoing a coronary and/or valvular surgery were identified, of whom 4,375 (50.4%) had no DD, 3,034 (34.9%) had grade I DD, 1,066 (12.3%) had grade II DD, and 207 (2.4%) had grade III DD. The median (IQR) time of the TTE prior to the index surgery was 6 (2-29) days. Operative mortality was 5.8% in the grade III DD group v 2.4% for grade II DD, 1.9% for grade I DD, and 2.1% for no DD (p = 0.001). Atrial fibrillation, prolonged mechanical ventilation (>24 hours), acute kidney injury, any packed red blood cell transfusion, reexploration for bleeding, and length of stay were higher in the grade III DD group compared to the rest of the cohort. The median follow-up was 4.0 (IQR: 1.7-6.5) years. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were lower in the grade III DD group than in the rest of the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that DD may be associated with poor short-term and long-term outcomes.

Consensus Defined Diastolic Dysfunction and Cardiac Postoperative Morbidity Score: A Prospective Observational Study

Diastolic dysfunction is associated with major adverse outcomes following cardiac surgery. We hypothesized that multisystem endpoints of morbidity would be higher in patients with diastolic dysfunction. A total of 142 patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass were included in the study. Intraoperative assessments of diastolic function according to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging guidelines using transesophageal echocardiography were performed. Cardiac Postoperative Morbidity Score (CPOMS) on days 3, 5, 8, and 15; length of stay in ICU and hospital; duration of intubation; incidence of new atrial fibrillation; 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were recorded. Diastolic function was determinable in 96.7% of the dataset pre and poststernotomy assessment (n = 240). Diastolic dysfunction was present in 70.9% (n = 88) of measurements before sternotomy and 75% (n = 93) after sternal closure. Diastolic dysfunction at either stage was associated with greater CPOMS on D5 (p = 0.009) and D8 (p = 0.009), with CPOMS scores 1.24 (p = 0.01) higher than in patients with normal function. Diastolic dysfunction was also associated with longer durations of intubation (p = 0.001), ICU length of stay (p = 0.019), and new postoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.016, OR (95% CI) = 4.50 (1.22–25.17)). We were able to apply the updated ASE/EACVI guidelines and grade diastolic dysfunction in the majority of patients. Any grade of diastolic dysfunction was associated with greater all-cause morbidity, compared with patients with normal diastolic function.

Association Between Elevated Echocardiographic Index of Left Ventricular Filling Pressure and Acute Kidney Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery

BACKGROUND

The ratio of the early transmitral flow velocity to early diastolic velocity of the mitral annulus (E/e') is an echocardiographic index of mean left ventricular (LV) filling pressure. We investigated the association between the preoperative E/e' ratio and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We reviewed 585 patients who underwent OPCAB and with preserved LV ejection fraction determined by preoperative echocardiography. AKI was determined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. E/e' was also analyzed as 3 categories (E/e' <8, 8≤E/e'≤15, and E/e' >15) and as a continuous variable. A propensity score analysis was used to match the patients with E/e' >15 and E/e' ≤15. A preoperative E/e' >15 was an independent predictor for AKI (odds ratio 3.01, 95% confidence interval 1.40-6.17). E/e' >15 was also an independent predictor for AKI when E/e' was analyzed with 3 categories or as a continuous variable. In the matched sample, the incidence of AKI and 1-year mortality was significantly higher in patients with E/e' >15.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing OPCAB with preserved LV systolic function, a preoperative E/e' ratio >15 was an independent predictor of postoperative AKI. Measurement of the preoperative E/e' ratio may help to assess the risk of postoperative AKI.

Usefulness of Preoperative Echocardiography to Predict Acute Kidney Injury and Long-Term Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This study identified echocardiographic predictors of AKI and determined whether these predictors were related to long-term mortality in CABG. This retrospective cohort study included 1,300 patients who underwent echocardiography before CABG at 2 tertiary referral centers from 2004 to 2010. The best echocardiographic predictor of AKI was determined using multivariate and stepwise selection methods. Patients were followed for 72 ± 28.8 months (maximum 11 years) for all-cause mortality. We measured the adjusted odds ratio and hazard ratio for AKI and all-cause mortality, respectively, according to the chosen parameter. E/e' was the best predictor of AKI among echocardiographic parameters. The high E/e' group (>15) exhibited a greater odds ratio for AKI (2.2 [1.51 to 3.27]) than the low E/e' group (<8). The high E/e' group required a longer hospital stay (16 days [12 to 23 days]) than the low E/e' group (14 days [11 to 17 days]). There were 272 deaths (21%) during follow-up. The high E/e' group exhibited a greater hazard ratio for long-term mortality (1.9 [1.34 to 2.76]) than the low E/e' group, and this difference remained statistically significant regardless of the occurrence of AKI and the size of the ejection fraction volume. E/e' in preoperative echocardiography is the best predictor of AKI and long-term mortality in patients undergoing CABG.

Predictors and Clinical Impacts of Aggravated Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BACKGROUND

To determine the predictors of aggravated left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) and to compare late outcomes according to the aggravated LVDD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

OPCAB was performed in 1,101 patients (2001-2013). LVDD was classified as normal, mild, moderate or severe. Patients were divided into 2 groups: non-aggravated LVDD (group I) and aggravated LVDD (group II). The primary endpoint was aggravation of LVDD. The secondary endpoint was late mortality and morbidity such as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) related to LVDD aggravation postoperatively. There were 894 patients in group I and 207 in group II. Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative peripheral artery obstructive disease (PAOD) (P=0.04), renal failure (P<0.01), and A' velocity (P<0.01) anticipated aggravated LVDD. The Cox hazards model revealed that aggravated LVDD was a poor prognostic factor for MACCE (P<0.01) and overall survival (P<0.01). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that aggravated LVDD was related to poor late outcomes (freedom from MACCE, P=0.01; overall survival, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Aggravated LVDD significantly affects late clinical outcomes after OPCAB and preoperative PAOD, renal failure, and A' velocity might be predictors. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1937-1945).

Cystatin C as a predictive marker of renal dysfunction and mid-term outcomes following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether plasma cystatin C and creatinine levels after isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) are predictive of postoperative renal dysfunction and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and December 2013, 1033 who underwent isolated OPCAB were recruited. The patients were divided into three groups according to the preoperative level of cystatin C: low (0.83 mg/L>), mid (0.83-1.13 mg/L) and high (1.13 mg/L<). The endpoints of all-cause mortality and major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events were compared among three groups using the Kaplan-Meier method. The predictive power of cystatin C was compared with creatinine using receiver operating curves.

RESULTS

Follow-up was complete in all of the included patients at a mean of 2.9±1.5 years. Within the follow-up period, 9 early (30-day mortality) and 46 late deaths occurred. The 30-day mortality was zero, four (44%), and five (56%) cases in low, mid and high groups, respectively (p=0.03). The cut-off value of cystatin C for renal dysfunction prediction was approximately 1.04 (mg/L, p<0.001), and cystatin C showed greater predictive power than creatinine for renal dysfunction (area under the curve=0.73 vs 0.65; p=0.01). One-year and five-year overall survival in low, mid and high groups were 99.2%, 98.9% and 94.3%, and 97.9%, 97.3% and 86.3%, respectively (low vs high, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Cystatin C is a stronger predictor of postoperative renal dysfunction than serum creatinine, and its level is directly correlated with mid-term OPCAB adverse results.

Posttreatment platelet reactivity on clopidogrel is associated with the risk of adverse events after off-pump coronary artery bypass

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is currently recommended in off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). However, no data exist concerning platelet reactivity on clopidogrel after OPCAB. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between platelet reactivity and late major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after OPCAB.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center, observational study, on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was measured using a point-of-care assay (VerifyNow system; Accumetrics Inc, San Diego, CA) in 859 patients who underwent OPCAB with 1 or more vein grafts. The primary end point was late MACEs (30 days-1 year) including cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to estimate the cutoff value of P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs) for MACEs.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff value for posttreatment reactivity for the incidence of late MACEs was ≥188 PRU (area under the curve 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.75, P = .002). The incidence of late MACEs was significantly higher in the high platelet reactivity (HPR; ≥188 PRU) group than in the low platelet reactivity (<188 PRU) group (3.6% vs. 1.4%, P = .040). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed 1-year MACE-free survival rates of 98.4% ± 0.5% and 95.9% ± 1.3% in the low platelet reactivity and HPR groups, respectively (P = .034). According to a Cox regression hazard model, HPR was an independent risk factor for late MACE-free survival (hazard ratio 3.51, 95% CI 1.27-9.69, P = .015).

CONCLUSION

High residual platelet reactivity after clopidogrel administration is strongly associated with 1-year MACE-free survival. Routine measurement of platelet reactivity and thorough monitoring of patients with HPR after OPCAB are warranted.

Incremental value of the preoperative echocardiogram to predict mortality and major morbidity in coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Although echocardiography is commonly performed before coronary artery bypass surgery, there has yet to be a study examining the incremental prognostic value of a complete echocardiogram.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery at 2 hospitals were divided into derivation and validation cohorts. A panel of quantitative echocardiographic parameters was measured. Clinical variables were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality or major morbidity, and the secondary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. The derivation cohort consisted of 667 patients with a mean age of 67.2±11.1 years and 22.8% females. The following echocardiographic parameters were found to be optimal predictors of mortality or major morbidity: severe diastolic dysfunction, as evidenced by restrictive filling (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-5.49), right ventricular dysfunction, as evidenced by fractional area change <35% (odds ratio, 3.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-7.20), or myocardial performance index >0.40 (odds ratio, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-3.15). These results were confirmed in the validation cohort of 187 patients. When added to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score, the echocardiographic parameters resulted in a net improvement in model discrimination and reclassification with a change in c-statistic from 0.68 to 0.73 and an integrated discrimination improvement of 5.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.8%-8.9%). In the Cox proportional hazards model, right ventricular dysfunction and pulmonary hypertension were independently predictive of mortality over 3.2 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative echocardiography, in particular right ventricular dysfunction and restrictive left ventricular filling, provides incremental prognostic value in identifying patients at higher risk of mortality or major morbidity after coronary artery bypass surgery.