Delayed aortic rupture after aortic endograft placement in patient with spinal hardware

Endovascular repair for thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysm induced by pedicle screw implantation: a case report with 8 years follow-up

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw instrument surgeries can result in the development of aortic pseudoaneurysm, which is a rare yet potentially severe complication; therefore, the purpose of this work is to describe the case of pseudoaneurysm of the thoracic aorta caused by the severe migration of a pedicle screw after surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

We herein report a patient who underwent endovascular repair for the pseudoaneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta following thoracic vertebral fixation surgery. A 28-80 mm covered stent was initially inserted through the right femoral artery, and intraoperative aortography revealed a minor extravasation of contrast material. Subsequently, an additional 28-140 mm covered stent was implanted. The patient recovered well during the 8-year follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular complications resulting from spinal surgery are severe and rare, necessitating early diagnosis and intervention.

Aortic injury in spine surgery……What a spine surgeon needs to know

Aortic injury is a rare, yet underreported and underestimated complication of spine surgery. Anatomical relation between the aorta and the spine changes under physiological (positional) as well as pathological (deformity) conditions, which puts the aorta at risk of injury during spine surgery. Clinical presentation of aortic injury ranges from asymptomatic perforation of the aorta to acute fatal bleeding. Although several diagnostic methods have been reported, CT-angiography remains an important diagnostic study. Several advancements in the open and the endovascular surgical management have been reported to be successfully used in the management of aortic injury following spine surgery. Management approach of malpositioned screws abutting the aorta is still controversial. Anatomical knowledge and understanding of the previously reported mechanisms of aortic injury are important to be integrated in the preoperative planning process. If the complication occurs, time-to- recognition and to-appropriate-management are important factors for predicting mortality. If unrecognized and untreated in the acutely injured patients, mortality can approach 100%.

Malpositioned pedicle screw in spine deformity surgery endangering the aorta: report of two cases, review of literature, and proposed management algorithm

STUDY DESIGN

Case reports and review of the literature with a proposed management algorithm.

OBJECTIVES

To report two cases of a potential vascular complication due to an incorrectly placed pedicle screw (PS) during spine deformity surgery. Relevant literature regarding the management of vascular complications is reviewed, and an evidence-based management algorithm is proposed. Aortic lesions represent a rare but potentially life-threatening complications with spine deformity and revision surgery, significantly increasing the risk. A management algorithm for an aortic lesion in the case of a malpositioned PS has not yet been published.

METHODS

Case 1: An 18-year-old female with proximal thoracic spinal non-instrumented fusion underwent a revision corrective procedure due to a progressive right-sided thoracolumbar compensatory curve. However, postoperative computed tomography (CT) performed to evaluate the position of the PS revealed malposition of the left T9 PS, which was abutting the descending aorta with CT angiography excluding the perforation of the aorta. Case 2: A 17-year-old male was scheduled for correction of Lenke 3-C-N adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Postoperative routine evaluation with low-dose CT revealed a left T9 PS paravertebral malposition, and subsequent CTA demonstrated that the thread of the PS was in contact with the descending thoracic aorta and an unlikely hemodynamically significant vessel injury.

RESULTS

Successful removal of both malpositioned PS was performed. In the first case, a cardiovascular surgeon attended the operation if an urgent thoracotomy was needed, and in the second case, additional video-assisted thoracoscopic control of the aorta was performed during PS removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative imaging in spinal surgery is essential to avoid major vascular and other complications when placing PS, especially in thoracic deformities. When a potential major vessel complication emerges, an interdisciplinary approach and an appropriate management algorithm are mandatory to make the best clinical decisions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Thoracic Aortic Pseudoaneurysm Due to Screw Dislodgment Following Anterior Spinal Approach. Complex Surgical Management of Both Issues: A Case Report and Review of Literature

A few descriptions about anterior thoracic arthrodesis causing thoracic aortic pseudoaneurysms due to late screw loosening are mentioned in the literature. We report a case that describes a hybrid approach complicated with an aortic injury when removing a screw from the aortic wall. A 57-year-old man was initially operated on for scoliosis due to poliomyelitis using dorsal thoracolumbar in situ fusion at an early age. At adulthood, the patient complained of spinal cord compression and severe myelopathy due to D9-D10 nonunion, and the patient required a double surgical approach. Almost a year later, he was diagnosed with a thoracic aneurysm caused by late screw loosening from the anterior plate. A hybrid approach was used to treat the aortic pseudoaneurysm (endograft stent) and for anterior vertebral hardware removal (rethoracotomy). Although an aortic stent was covering the aortic lumen, during the open part of the procedure, an aortic injury took place when removing the screw, requiring quick cross clamping and repair. Anterior vertebral hardware removal after a previous anterior spinal approach is a technically highly demanding procedure. As unexpected life-threatening complications can occur, this procedure should be performed in a setting with the capacity for both endovascular and open aortic repair.

Reliability and Usefulness of Intraoperative 3-Dimensional Imaging by Mobile C-Arm With Flat-Panel Detector

STUDY DESIGN

Reliability and agreement study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the reliability of intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging with a mobile C-arm (3D C-arm) equipped with a flat-panel detector.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screws are widely used in spinal surgery. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) is the most reliable method to detect screw misplacement. Recent advances in imaging devices have enabled surgeons to acquire 3D images of the spine during surgery. However, the reliability of these imaging devices is not known.

METHODS

A total of 203 screws were used in 22 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for scoliosis. Screw position was read twice with a 3D C-arm and twice with CT in a blinded manner by 2 independent observers. Screw positions were classified into 4 categories at every 2 mm and then into 2 simpler categories of acceptable or unacceptable. The degree of agreement with respect to screw positions between the double readings was evaluated by κ value. With unanimous agreement between 2 observers regarding postoperative CT readings considered the gold standard, the sensitivity of the 3D C-arm for determining screw misplacement was calculated.

RESULTS

A total 804 readings were performed. For the 4-category classification, the mean κ value for the 2 interobserver readings was 0.52 for the 3D C-arm and 0.46 for CT. For the 2-category classification, the mean κ value for the 2 interobserver readings was 0.80 for the 3D C-arm and 0.66 for CT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of intraoperative imaging with the 3D C-arm were 70%, 95%, 44%, and 98%, respectively. With respect to screws with perforation ≥4 mm, the sensitivity was 83%. No revision surgery was performed.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative imaging with a 3D C-arm was reliable for detecting screw misplacement and helpful in decreasing the rate of revision surgery for screw misplacement.

[Prevention of aortic erosion by a bone cement skid : Thoracic endovascular aortic repair following kyphoplasty]

The underlying case report describes the successful endovascular prevention of an aortic injury by a bone cement skid after kyphoplasty. The intervention was performed in order to prohibit fatal aortic rupture or embolisation and underlines the role of vascular surgery techniques in interdisciplinary clinical networks.

Delayed Presentation of Aortic Injury by a Thoracic Pedicle Screw

Delayed presentation of a thoracic aortic injury is an extremely rare complication after spine surgery. We report a case of delayed presentation of a thoracic aortic injury with a vertebral pedicle screw after posterior spinal surgery without periaortic hematoma, hemorrhage or pseudoaneurysm formation and review the relevant literature.

Hemoptysis Due to Anterior Scoliosis Implants: A Case Report

CASE

A twenty-five-year-old man presented with recurrent episodes of hemoptysis requiring hospitalization and interventional embolization. Instrumentation that had been implanted ten years previously for anterior spinal correction and fusion to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis adjoined the medial border of the right lung. The instrumentation eroded the lung during respiration, which prompted the formation of adhesions and fibrosis. Because of the risk of additional hemoptysis events, we performed revision thoracotomy, removal of the spinal instrumentation, and partial lobectomy.

CONCLUSION

This rare and serious complication underscores the importance of meticulous surgical technique to ensure proper implant placement and of vigilant monitoring for late iatrogenic injury.

Aortic dissection associated with penetration of a spinal pedicle screw: a case report and review of the literature

A 30-year-old male underwent a corrective posterior instrumented spinal fusion for scoliosis. Six years later, he was found to have an aortic dissection after aortic penetration of a spinal pedicle screw. We review the literature, including diagnostic modalities, and treatment decision-making for this unusual complication.

Safety of pedicle screws and spinal instrumentation for pediatric patients: comparative analysis between 0- and 5-year-old, 5- and 10-year-old, and 10- and 15-year-old patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety of pedicle screws and constructs for infantile and juvenile patients with spinal deformity.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few studies have examined the safety and complication rates associated with the usage of pedicle screw for children younger than 10 years.

METHODS

Radiographical and clinical data were collected of patients treated with pedicle screws at a single institution. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on age (0-5 yr old, 5-10 yr) and compared with an older cohort of 10- to 15-year-old patients. Patient demographics, screw adjustment, and complication data were collected for each group. Outcomes were analyzed using analysis of variance (P < 0.05).

RESULTS

In total, 5054 pedicle screws were analyzed: 176 in the 0- to 5-year-old group (31 patients), 659 in the 5- to 10-year-old group (68 patients), and 4219 in the 10- to 15-year-old group (234 patients). Mean follow-up was 3.1 ± 1.8 years (range, 3 mo-9 yr). There were 7 pedicle screw-associated complications (3 required revision surgery). Overall pedicle screw-associated complication rates were 2.1% per patient and 0.1% per screw. There were no neurological complications associated with misplacement of a pedicle screw. The pedicle screw-associated complication rates per patient and per screw were 3.2% and 0.6% in the 0- to 5-year-old group, 2.9% and 0.3% in the 5- to 10-year-old group, and 1.7% and 0.1% in the 10- to 15-year-old group (P > 0.05). The 5- to 10-year-old group had a significantly higher overall surgically related complication rate (34%) than the 0- to 5-year-old group (7%) and the 10- to 15-year-old group (6%) (P = 0.005), primarily due to the "growth friendly" constructs common in this age group.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle screws can be used for infantile or juvenile patients, although complication rates associated with pedicle screws tended to be slightly higher in the younger groups.

Screw in the aorta: minimally invasive graft replacement for chronic aortic erosion by spinal instrument

Intra-and early post-operative aortic injury by pedicle screw is not a rare complication in orthopedic surgery, but aortic penetration by a screw head over a long time period is considered as an uncommon case. There are various surgical management options for thoracic aortic injury caused by malpositioned spinal instruments. We report a case of a patient who underwent minimally invasive graft replacement of the descending thoracic artery for pedicle screw penetration.

Hybrid approach for removal of an errant intra-vascular pedicle spinal fixation screw in the thoracic aorta

Late presentation of aortic injuries secondary to internal fixation hardware is uncommon and generally associated with pseudoaneurysm formation. We herein present a case of transmural migration of a pedicle screw into the descending thoracic aorta, which was revealed incidentally by computed tomography scan after almost 4 years of hardware implantation. Approximately 75% of the pedicle screw was exposed to the bloodstream, and was successfully removed using endovascular segmental exclusion to avoid aortic cross-clamping and an open approach via left thoracotomy. This case illustrates the successful repair of an iatrogenic aortic injury using a hybrid technique.