Twenty-Year Analysis of Autologous Support of the Pulmonary Autograft in the Ross Procedure

Influence of preoperative aortic regurgitation on long-term autograft durability and dilatation in children and adolescents undergoing the Ross procedure

OBJECTIVE

Primary aortic insufficiency (AI) is a risk factor for autograft reintervention in adults undergoing the Ross procedure. We sought to examine the influence of preoperative AI on autograft durability in children and adolescents.

METHODS

From 1993 to 2020, 125 consecutive patients between ages 1 and 18 underwent a Ross procedure. The autograft was implanted using a full-root technique in 123 (98.4%) and included in a polyethelene terephthalate graft in 2 (1.6%). Patients with aortic stenosis (aortic stenosis group) (n = 85) were retrospectively compared with those with AI or mixed disease (AI group) (n = 40). Median length of follow-up was 8.2 years (interquartile range, 3.3-15.4 years). The primary end point was the incidence of severe AI or autograft reintervention. Secondary end points included changes in autograft dimensions analyzed using mixed-effect models.

RESULTS

The incidence of severe AI or autograft reintervention was 39.0% ± 13.0% in the AI group and 8.8% ± 4.4% in the aortic stenosis group at 15 years (P = .02). Annulus z scores increased in both aortic stenosis and AI groups over time (P < .001). However, the annulus dilated at a faster rate in the AI group (absolute difference, 3.8 ± 2.0 vs 2.5 ± 1.7; P = .03). Sinus of Valsalva z scores increased in both groups as well (P < .001), but at similar rates over time (P = .11).

CONCLUSIONS

Children and adolescents with AI undergoing the Ross procedure have higher rates of autograft failure. Patients with preoperative AI have more pronounced dilatation at the annulus. Akin to adults, a surgical aortic annulus stabilization technique that modulates growth is needed in children.

Late Pulmonary Autograft Dilation: Can We Make a Good Operation Great? The Supported Ross

The Ross procedure is an excellent option for aortic valve replacement resulting in outstanding hemodynamic performance and the ability to avoid systemic anticoagulation. The long-term durability of the autograft is generally good but concerns for later aortic root dilation with ensuing neoaortic insufficiency have prompted efforts to stabilize the autograft, root, sinuses and Sino-tubular junction in order to delay or entirely avoid late reinterventions on the neoaortic root. We have employed an inclusion technique, supporting the Auto-graft in a Terumo Gelweave™ Valsalva graft. We performed a retrospective study of all 129 patients undergoing the Ross procedure from 1992 to 2019 at Children's Wisconsin. Fifty-one underwent the supported Ross (SR) and 78 underwent unsupported Ross (UR). Structured clinical data was collected and echocardiograms were reviewed. Median follow-up was 4.9 years (up to 22.6 years) for UR patients and 3.6 years (up to 11.4 years) for SR patients. In order to provide a fair comparison, we sub -analyzed patients aged 10 to 18 years who underwent the Ross procedure, 16 who underwent the UR and 18 patients who underwent the SR. Change in aortic annulus diameter (P = 0.002), aortic sinus diameter (P = 0.001) change in left ventricular function (P = 0.039) and change in aortic insufficiency (P = 0.008) were all worse in UR. The SR is simple, reproducible, and predictable. It seems to prevent change in annulus diameter, sinus diameter and to reduce late neoaortic insufficiency. Longer follow-up with a larger group of patients is required to draw definitive conclusions.

Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes Following the Ross Procedure: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The Ross procedure as treatment for adults with aortic valve disease (AVD) has been the subject of renewed interest.

Objective

To evaluate the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes following the Ross procedure for the treatment of adults with AVD.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial included adult patients (age <69 years) who underwent a Ross procedure for the treatment of AVD, including those with active endocarditis, rheumatic AVD, decreased ejection fraction, and previous cardiac surgery. The trial, conducted from September 1, 1994, to May 31, 2001, compared homograft root replacement with the Ross procedure at a single center. Data after 2010 were collected retrospectively in November and December 2022.

Exposure

Ross procedure.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was long-term survival among patients who underwent the Ross procedure compared with that in the age-, country of origin- and sex-matched general population. Secondary end points were freedom from any reintervention, autograft reintervention, or homograft reintervention and time-related valve function, autograft diameter, and functional status.

Results

This study included 108 adults (92 [85%] male) with a median age of 38 years (range, 19-66 years). Median duration of clinical follow-up was 24.1 years (IQR, 22.6-26.1 years; 2488 patient-years), with 98% follow-up completeness. Of these patients, 9 (8%) had active endocarditis and 45 (42%) underwent reoperations. The main hemodynamic lesion was stenosis in 30 (28%) and regurgitation in 49 (45%). There was 1 perioperative death (0.9%). Twenty-five year survival was 83.0% (95% CI, 75.5%-91.2%), representing a relative survival of 99.1% (95% CI, 91.8%-100%) compared with the general population (83.7%). At 25 years, freedom from any reintervention was 71.1% (95% CI, 61.6%-82.0%); from autograft reintervention, 80.3% (95% CI, 71.9%-89.6%); and from homograft reintervention, 86.3% (95% CI, 79.0%-94.3%). Thirty-day mortality after the first Ross-related reintervention was 0% and after all Ross-related reinterventions was 3.8% (n = 1); 10-year survival after reoperation was 96.2% (95% CI, 89.0%-100%).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study found that the Ross procedure provided excellent survival into the third decade postoperatively that was comparable to that in the general population. Long-term freedom from reintervention demonstrated that the Ross procedure may be a durable substitute into late adulthood, showing a delayed but progressive functional decline.

Trial Registration

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN03530985.

Paediatric aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and microsimulation study

AIMS

To support decision-making in children undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR), by providing a comprehensive overview of published outcomes after paediatric AVR, and microsimulation-based age-specific estimates of outcome with different valve substitutes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review of published literature reporting clinical outcome after paediatric AVR (mean age <18 years) published between 1/1/1990 and 11/08/2021 was conducted. Publications reporting outcome after paediatric Ross procedure, mechanical AVR (mAVR), homograft AVR (hAVR), and/or bioprosthetic AVR were considered for inclusion. Early risks (<30d), late event rates (>30d) and time-to-event data were pooled and entered into a microsimulation model. Sixty-eight studies, of which one prospective and 67 retrospective cohort studies, were included, encompassing a total of 5259 patients (37 435 patient-years; median follow-up: 5.9 years; range 1-21 years). Pooled mean age for the Ross procedure, mAVR, and hAVR was 9.2 ± 5.6, 13.0 ± 3.4, and 8.4 ± 5.4 years, respectively. Pooled early mortality for the Ross procedure, mAVR, and hAVR was 3.7% (95% CI, 3.0%-4.7%), 7.0% (5.1%-9.6%), and 10.6% (6.6%-17.0%), respectively, and late mortality rate was 0.5%/year (0.4%-0.7%/year), 1.0%/year (0.6%-1.5%/year), and 1.4%/year (0.8%-2.5%/year), respectively. Microsimulation-based mean life-expectancy in the first 20 years was 18.9 years (18.6-19.1 years) after Ross (relative life-expectancy: 94.8%) and 17.0 years (16.5-17.6 years) after mAVR (relative life-expectancy: 86.3%). Microsimulation-based 20-year risk of aortic valve reintervention was 42.0% (95% CI: 39.6%-44.6%) after Ross and 17.8% (95% CI: 17.0%-19.4%) after mAVR.

CONCLUSION

Results of paediatric AVR are currently suboptimal with substantial mortality especially in the very young with considerable reintervention hazards for all valve substitutes, but the Ross procedure provides a survival benefit over mAVR. Pros and cons of substitutes should be carefully weighed during paediatric valve selection.

The Supported vs Unsupported Ross in Pediatric Patients: Neoaortic Root and Ventricular Function

BACKGROUND

The supported Ross is used to mitigate the neoaortic root dilation that has been described with the unsupported Ross. There is limited literature assessing the efficacy of the supported Ross in young patients. In this study, the fate of the neoaortic root was compared in the supported and unsupported Ross procedure in adolescent patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent the Ross procedure between 1996 and 2019. An analysis was conducted of patients aged 10 to 18 years who underwent the supported and unsupported Ross operation, without a Konno enlargement, to assess for longitudinal echocardiographic changes. Given differences in follow-up time, both regression analysis and Mann-Whitney nonparametric tests were used to correct for time from discharge to most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time for supported and unsupported Ross patients without a Konno enlargement was 2.90 years (0.21-13.03 years) and 12.13 years (2.63-19.47 years), respectively. Unsupported Ross patients experienced a higher rate of change per year in the aortic annulus (P = .003 and P = .014) and aortic sinus (P = .002 and P = .002) diameters, respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of change of end-diastolic left ventricular internal diameter (P = .703 and P = .92) and aortic insufficiency (P = .687 and P = .215) between the supported and unsupported Ross patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Progressive dilation of the neoaortic root in unsupported Ross patients is significantly mitigated with the supported Ross with excellent stability. The supported Ross is safe and effective and may play an increasing role in the management of children with aortic disease.

Survival and freedom from reoperation after the Ross procedure in a Russian adult population: A single-center experience

Objectives

To evaluate our 12-year experience with the Ross procedure in adults.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 215 cases of the Ross procedure was performed. The mean age of the patients was 36 ± 11.1 years, and the male to female ratio was 75% to 25%, respectively. The pulmonary autograft was placed into the aortic position using the full-root replacement technique and its modified versions. The right ventricular outflow tract was reconstructed using a pulmonary homograft in all cases.

Results

The 30-day mortality after the operation was 0.9% (2 patients). The median duration of follow-up was 6.1 years (interquartile range, 6.5 years) and was complete in 86% of cases. The survival at 12 years was 94.7% and was comparable with the survival rate of the general population matched for age and sex. At the end of the follow-up, freedom from reoperation due to pulmonary autograft and homograft dysfunction was 89.1% and 99%, respectively.

Conclusions

In our series, the Ross procedure resulted in low early mortality and excellent survival in adults. The long-term survival was not statistically different from the survival of the general population. The pulmonary homograft offered an excellent durability and freedom from reoperation.

Wall stresses of early remodeled pulmonary autografts

OBJECTIVE

The Ross procedure is an excellent option for children or young adults who need aortic valve replacement because it can restore survival to that of the normal aged-matched population. However, autograft remodeling can lead to aneurysmal formation and reoperation, and the biomechanics of this process is unknown. This study investigated postoperative autograft remodeling after the Ross procedure by examining patient-specific autograft wall stresses.

METHODS

Patients who have undergone the Ross procedure who had intraoperative pulmonary root and aortic specimens collected were recruited. Patient-specific models (n = 16) were developed using patient-specific material property and their corresponding geometry from cine magnetic resonance imaging at 1-year follow-up. Autograft ± Dacron for aneurysm repair and ascending aortic geometries were reconstructed to develop patient-specific finite element models, which incorporated material properties and wall thickness experimentally measured from biaxial stretching. A multiplicative approach was used to account for prestress geometry from in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Pressure loading to systemic pressure (120/80) was performed using LS-DYNA software (LSTC Inc, Livermore, Calif).

RESULTS

At systole, first principal stresses were 809 kPa (25%-75% interquartile range, 691-1219 kPa), 567 kPa (485-675 kPa), 637 kPa (555-755 kPa), and 382 kPa (334-413 kPa) at the autograft sinotubular junction, sinuses, annulus, and ascending aorta, respectively. Second principal stresses were 360 kPa (310-426 kPa), 355 kPa (320-394 kPa), 272 kPa (252-319 kPa), and 184 kPa (147-222 kPa) at the autograft sinotubular junction, sinuses, annulus, and ascending aorta, respectively. Mean autograft diameters were 29.9 ± 2.7 mm, 38.3 ± 5.3 mm, and 26.6 ± 4.0 mm at the sinotubular junction, sinuses, and annulus, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Peak first principal stresses were mainly located at the sinotubular junction, particularly when Dacron reinforcement was used. Patient-specific simulations lay the foundation for predicting autograft dilatation in the future after understanding biomechanical behavior during long-term follow-up.

The Ross procedure in children: a systematic review

Background

The Ross procedure involves autograft transplantation of the native pulmonary valve into the aortic position and reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) with a homograft. The operation offers the advantages of a native valve with excellent hemodynamic performance, the avoidance of anticoagulation, and growth potential. Conversely, the operation is technically demanding and imposes the risk of turning single-valve disease into double-valve disease. This systematic review reports outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing the Ross procedure.

Methods

An electronic search identified studies reporting outcomes on pediatric patients (mean age <18 years, max age <21 years) undergoing the Ross procedure. Long-term outcomes, including early mortality, late mortality, sudden unexpected unexplained death, reoperation due to failure of the pulmonary autograft or RVOT reconstruction, thromboembolic events, bleeding events, and endocarditis-related complications, were evaluated.

Results

Upon review of 2,035 publications, 30 studies and 3,156 pediatric patients were included. Patients had a median age of 9.5 years and median follow-up period of 5.7 years. Early mortality rates varied from 0.0 to 17.0% and were increased in the neonatal population. Late mortality rates were much lower (0.04-1.83%/year). Reoperation due to pulmonary autograft failure occurred at rates of 0.37-2.81%/year and reoperation due to RVOT reconstruction failure was required at rates of 0.34-4.76%/year. Thromboembolic, bleeding, and endocarditis events were reported to occur at rates of 0.00-0.58, 0.00-0.39, and 0.00-1.68%/year, respectively.

Conclusions

The Ross operation offers a durable aortic valve replacement (AVR) option in the pediatric population that offers favorable survival, excellent hemodynamics, growth potential, decreased risk of complications, and avoidance of anticoagulation. Larger multi-institutional registries focusing on pediatric patients are necessary to provide more robust evidence to further support use of the Ross procedure in this population.

The Ross procedure and valve-sparing root replacement procedures in the adult patient: do guidelines follow the evidence?

Prosthetic aortic valve replacements have long been the mainstay of valvular surgery due to their favorable outcomes and low operative complexity. Yet, mechanical valves require lifelong anticoagulation, whereas bioprosthetic valves increase the risk for earlier and more frequent reoperation. Alternative reconstructive techniques have been proposed to address these challenges. These include valve-sparing root replacement procedures if the native aortic valve can be salvaged, and the Ross procedure, which nearly eliminates prosthetic valve-related thromboembolism, anticoagulation-related hemorrhage and endocarditis. Both procedures are technically more complex and thus subject to surgeons' volume and expertise compared to conventional aortic valve replacements. However, they are associated with more favorable outcomes compared to aortic valve replacements if performed by experienced surgeons, especially in younger patients. Nevertheless, despite the growing high-quality literature supporting both procedures, existing multi-society guidelines fail to acknowledge the strength of evidence in support of valve-sparing root replacement procedures and the Ross procedure. In this review, we summarize the existing long-term evidence for the use of each procedure, describe the current guidelines for the treatment of aortic valve pathology, and propose the reevaluation of guidelines based on the available clinical evidence.

Current Therapeutic Options in Aortic Stenosis

Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease requiring valve replacement. Valve replacement therapies have undergone progressive evolution since the 1960s. Over the last 20 years, transcatheter aortic valve replacement has radically transformed the care of aortic stenosis, such that it is now the treatment of choice for many, particularly elderly, patients. This review provides an overview of the pathophysiology, presentation, diagnosis, indications for intervention, and current therapeutic options for aortic stenosis.

Technical Modifications that Might Improve Long-Term Outcome of the Ross Procedure in Children

BACKGROUND

Failure of the pulmonary autograft (PVA) following the Ross procedure (RP) has discouraged its widespread use and led to modifications or alternatives to the procedure. We sought to analyze whether certain technical modifications could improve results of the RP in children.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients (median age 12 years, range 0.25 to 17.9) underwent the RP between 01/1996 and 12/2018. Concomitant Konno procedure was performed on 20/69 (29%). Prior interventions included balloon valvuloplasty in 30/69 (44%), and/or surgical valvuloplasty in 39/69 (57%). Technical modifications included utilizing the native aortic root for external annuloplasty, implanting the autograft using uniplanar horizontal sutures through the aortic wall, normalizing the sinotubular junction and wrapping the native root remnant around the PVA.

RESULTS

Operative mortality was 1/69 (1.5%), with no late death. No patient had neoaortic valvar stenosis and 7/68 (10%) had mild regurgitation on discharge echocardiogram. At latest follow-up (median 9.4 years, range 0.4 - 21.3) there was no significant change in the latest follow up Z scores of annulus, sinus or sinotubular junction diameters when compared to those at discharge. Three patients (4.4%) required late autograft replacement, two PVA repair, and two resection of pseudoaneurysm. Actuarial freedom from PVA replacement was 87% at 20 yrs. Freedom from right ventricular outflow tract catheter reintervention or reoperation was 83% and 80% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical modifications of the RP used in this cohort might successfully prolong the life of the PVA without compromising its growth, an important advantage in pediatric patients.

The outcomes of the inclusion Ross in select patients ≥ 50, compared to a younger cohort

BACKGROUND

The Ross procedure is rarely considered in older patients. The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative and long-term outcomes of patients >50 years of age with younger patients after the Ross Procedure.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2018, 455 patients underwent the Ross procedure utilizing the inclusion technique. Patients with redo-surgery, non-aortic procedures and unsupported root replacement were excluded. The remaining were matched for native valve morphology, valve lesion and annular manipulation and yielded 96 matched pairs. Preoperative and operative characteristics, perioperative outcomes, survival rates, valve related adverse events and valve hemodynamics were assessed.

RESULTS

There was no in hospital mortality. The median follow up was 11 years for both cohorts. Over-all survival at 15 years was similar: 99% (95% CI 89.8%-99.8%) for patients >50 and 98% (95% CI 89.3-99.7%) for younger patients. Patients >50 had a notable freedom from ross related re-intervention at 15 years: 94% (95% CI 84.8-97.7%) vs. 90% (95% CI 80.2-95.6%) in younger patients. The mixed model analysis revealed being fifty and older was not significantly associated with higher autograft gradient or regurgitation. Interestingly, being fifty and older correlated with decreased allograft regurgitation and stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients undergoing the Ross procedure had comparable outcomes to younger patients. Patients fifty and over, that are high functioning with minimal comorbidities, should be considered for the Ross procedure.

Pulmonary Valve Function Late After Ross Procedure in 443 Adult Patients

BACKGROUND

Limited data exist on long-term pulmonary valve function after the Ross procedure. This study sought to determine the long-term function of the pulmonary valve in 443 consecutive adult patients who underwent a Ross procedure.

METHODS

All 443 patients who underwent a Ross procedure between November 1992 and March 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. All underwent pulmonary valve replacement using a cryopreserved pulmonary allograft. Freedom from the study's outcomes were calculated using Kaplan Meier survival. Risk factors for valve failure were analyzed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Mean age at time of operation was 39 years (range: 15-66 years). There was 1 (0.2%, 1 of 443) operative mortality. Nine patients required reintervention on the pulmonary allograft at a mean 6.1 years (range: 1-12 years) after Ross procedure. Patients required pulmonary allograft reintervention for infective endocarditis (n = 4), severe pulmonary stenosis (n = 4), or severe pulmonary regurgitation (n = 1). Freedom from pulmonary allograft reintervention was 98.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.1%-99.6%), 97.7% (95% CI 95.1%-98.9%), 96.6% (95% CI 93.3%-98.3%), and 96.6% (95% CI 93.3%-98.3%) at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Freedom from pulmonary allograft dysfunction (at least moderate pulmonary regurgitation and/or mean systolic gradient ≥ 25 mm Hg and/or reintervention) was 94.5% (95% CI 91.6%-96.4%), 88.1% (95% CI 83.6%-91.4%), 84.9% (95% CI 79.6%-88.9%), and 78.3% (95% CI 69.5%-84.9%) at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. No risk factors were identified to influence pulmonary valve durability.

CONCLUSIONS

The pulmonary valve allograft gives excellent long-term function when used in adults undergoing the Ross procedure. Reintervention on the pulmonary valve is rare and significant pulmonary allograft dysfunction is uncommon.

Improved Survival After the Ross Procedure Compared With Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether the Ross procedure offers superior survival compared with mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR).

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated experience and compared long-term survival between the Ross procedure and mechanical AVR.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2016, a total of 392 Ross procedures were performed. These were compared with 1,928 isolated mechanical AVRs performed during the same time period as identified using the University of Melbourne and Australia and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons' Cardiac Surgery Databases. Only patients between 18 and 65 years of age were included. Propensity-score matching was performed for risk adjustment.

RESULTS

Ross procedure patients were younger, and had fewer cardiovascular risk factors. The Ross procedure was associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times. Thirty-day mortality was similar (Ross, 0.3%; mechanical, 0.8%; p = 0.5). Ross procedure patients experienced superior unadjusted long-term survival at 20 years (Ross, 95%; mechanical, 68%; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed the Ross procedure to be associated with a reduced risk of late mortality (hazard ratio: 0.34; 95% confidence internal: 0.17 to 0.67; p < 0.001). Among 275 propensity-score matched pairs, Ross procedure patients had superior survival at 20 years (Ross, 94%; mechanical, 84%; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

In this Australian, propensity-score matched study, the Ross procedure was associated with better long-term survival compared with mechanical AVR. In younger patients, with a long life expectancy, the Ross procedure should be considered in centers with sufficient expertise.

The Ross procedure in adults presenting with bicuspid aortic valve and pure aortic regurgitation: 85% freedom from reoperation at 20 years

OBJECTIVES

The Ross procedure has demonstrated excellent results when performed in patients with aortic stenosis or mixed aortic valve disease [aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation (AR)]. However, due to its reported risk of late reoperation, it is not recommended under current guidelines for patients presenting with bicuspid aortic valve and pure AR. We have analysed our own results in light of this recommendation.

METHODS

Between 1993 and 2016, 129 consecutive patients with a mean age of 34.7 ± 10.6 years (range 16-64 years) presented with bicuspid aortic valve and pure AR and underwent the Ross procedure. Patients were reviewed annually and had 2nd yearly transthoracic echocardiograms during follow-up. The unit had a liberal reoperation policy where reoperation was performed if patients developed recurrent moderate or greater AR during follow-up.

RESULTS

There was 1 inpatient death, and 3 late deaths over a mean follow-up duration of 9.6 ± 6.8 years. Late survival at 10 and 20 years post-surgery were 99% [95% confidence interval (CI) 94-100] and 95% (95% CI 85-99), respectively. Eleven patients underwent redo aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 4 patients had redo pulmonary valve replacement. Freedom from reoperation for AVR and more-than-mild AR at 10 and 20 years post-surgery were 89% (95% CI 81-94) and 85% (95% CI 74-92), respectively. Having longer aortic cross-clamp (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.06; P = 0.05) and cardiopulmonary bypass times (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.05; P = 0.05), and having a larger preoperative sinotubular junction diameter (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% CI 1.03-1.30; P = 0.02) were significant predictors of having redo AVR or significant AR at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With a 20-year freedom from redo AVR and greater-than-mild residual AR of 85%, the utilization of the Ross procedure in bicuspid aortic valve patients with pure AR should be considered.

Expanding Eligibility for the Ross Procedure: A Reasonable Proposition?

BACKGROUND

Although the Ross procedure offers potential benefits in young adults, technical complexity represents a significant limitation. Therefore, the safety of expanding its use in more complex settings is uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes of standard isolated Ross procedures vs expanding elgibility to higher-risk clinical settings.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2016, 261 patients (46 ± 12 years) underwent Ross procedures in 2 centres. Patients were divided into 2 groups: standard Ross (n = 166) and expanded eligibility Ross (n = 95). Inclusion criteria for the expanded eligibility group were previous cardiac surgery, acute aortic valve endocarditis, severely impaired left ventricular (LV) function and patients undergoing concomitant procedures. All data were prospectively collected and are 100% complete.

RESULTS

Hospital mortality was 0% in the standard group (0/166) vs 2% in the expanded eligibility group (2/95) (P = 0.13). Sixteen patients (10%) developed acute renal injury in the standard group vs 13 (14%) patients in the expanded eligibility group (P = 0.31). There were no postoperative myocardial infarctions, no neurological events, and no infectious complications. Median intensive care unit (ICU) stay in the standard group was 2 vs 3 days in the expanded eligibility group (P = 0.004), whereas median hospital stay was 6 vs 7 days, respectively (range: 3-19 days) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Aside from longer ICU and hospital lengths of stay after the Ross procedure in higher-risk clinical scenarios, perioperative mortality and morbidity is similar to standard Ross procedures. Expanding the use of the Ross operation in young adults is a safe alternative in centres of expertise.

20 years experience with the Ross operation in middle-aged patients: the autologous principle is still alive

Objectives

Review our long-term results with the Ross operation in middle-aged patients.

Methods

Between 1995 and 2016, 129 consecutive patients (106 males); mean age (47.2 ± 5.2 years) underwent a Ross operation. Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction was performed with cryopreserved (n = 45) or decellularized allografts (n = 84). Mean follow-up was 8.4 ± 5.3 years (0.1 20.5 years). We analyzed early and late mortality, as well as valve related events and the need for reoperations.

Results

Early mortality was 1.6% and late survival was 87.6% at 16 years. There were 4 reoperations on the pulmonary autograft (96% freedom at 16 years) and 2 on the pulmonary allografts (99% freedom at 16 years). The 16-year freedom from more than mild aortic insufficiency (AI) and a late root diameter >45 mm was 64% and 71%, respectively. Patients with the preoperative diagnosis of AI are at greater risk for these complications. Among the allografts, decellularized allografts showed superior freedom from structural valve dysfunction.

Conclusions

The Ross operation in this cohort was associated with long-term survival similar to the general population and low incidence of reoperations. Patients with the preoperative diagnosis of AI are at increased risk for late autograft insufficiency and root dilatation. Decellularized allografts presented the best results for reconstruction of the RVOT. These results support the conclusion that the Ross operation has an important role in the treatment of middle-aged patients with aortic valve disease, especially those with pure aortic stenosis.

Surgical Relief of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Adults With Congenital Aortic Stenosis and Associated Aortic Annulus Hypoplasia and/or Subaortic Obstruction

BACKGROUND

In children and adolescents, a Ross/Konno operation is commonly done to both enlarge the aortic root and provide a competent aortic valve with relief of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO). Optimum management is not so straightforward in adults.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2014, 16 patients of mean age 39.4 years (18-57 years) with hypoplastic aortic annulus (AA) measuring 20mm and less, and mean aortic valve/LVOT gradient of 61mmHg (30-70mmHg) presented for surgery.

RESULTS

Eight patients with mean LVOT/AA diameter 19.6mm (18-20mm) underwent an "inclusion-cylinder" type Ross procedure (RP). Eight patients with more severe LVOT/AA obstruction, with mean diameter of 17.4mm (16-19mm) underwent mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with standard Konno-type aortoventriculoplasty. There was zero early and late mortality; with mean follow-up of 11.6 years (3-21 years) in the Ross group and 6 years (2-10 years) in the Konno-AVR group. One patient in the Konno-AVR group had reoperation after 2 years for RVOT obstruction. The postoperative echocardiograms of these patients at last follow-up show residual mean gradient across LVOT/AA of 4.4mmHg (2-6mmHg) after RP, and 11.9mmHg (8-17mmHg) after Konno-AVR.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults, the "inclusion-cylinder" Ross-procedure is a good alternative for mild to moderate aortic root hypoplasia. However, for cases with severe LVOT obstruction, a Ross-Konno is not possible with the same method of autologous support used in a non-Konno RP, and this could be expected to have an impact on late durability and the need for further intervention, in a group that has already undergone multiple procedures in childhood. Both methods of RP and Konno-AVR lead to excellent early and late results.

The Ross procedure: time for a hard look at current practices and a reexamination of the guidelines

The ideal aortic valve substitute for young adults requiring aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains elusive. Young and middle-aged patients have a longer anticipated life expectancy and a higher level of physical activity than their elderly counterparts. In recent years, there has been a growing focus on long-term outcomes following AVR in this specific patient population. These studies highlight the direct impact of the choice of prosthesis on long-term survival, quality of life and rates of valve-related complications in younger adults. Although conventional AVR using a biological or mechanical prosthesis significantly improve the natural history of the disease, there are many inherent limitations, which need to be addressed. Despite declining use of the Ross procedure in recent years, several long-term registry, cohort and comparative studies in the last decade, indicate a clear role for this operation in young and middle-aged adults requiring AVR. These advantages are manifest in terms of long-term survival, freedom from valve-related complications and quality of life. In this Perspective article, we discuss findings from a recently published propensity-matched analysis of long-term outcomes following mechanical AVR versus the Ross procedure, showing better cardiac- and valve-related survival in the Ross cohort, lower rates of stroke and major bleeding and equal rates of reoperation at 20 years. These data are placed in the broader context of currently available evidence regarding the Ross procedure and a broader discussion pertaining to its role in today's practice and the need to reexamine current valvular guidelines so they are more reflective of the actual evidence.

The Ross procedure in young adults: over 20 years of experience in our Institution

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes following the Ross procedure in young adults in our institution.

METHODS

All adult patients who received a Ross operation between 1991 and 2014 were included in the study. Survival analysis and regression analysis were performed. Survival of the Ross cohort was compared with the age-, gender- and calendar year-matched general population.

RESULTS

Three hundred-and-six patients (mean age: 41.7 ± 9.7, male: 74.8%, bicuspid aortic valve: 58.5%, valve stenosis: 68%) were included in the analysis. There were 7 perioperative deaths (2.3%). Nine patients were lost to follow-up from hospital and completeness of the follow-up was 94%. The median follow-up of the remaining 290 patients was 10.6 years. There were 21 late deaths of which only 3 were valve-related. The overall survival at 15 years since surgery is 88 ± 3% that is comparable with the matched population. Freedom from valve-related deaths was 96.8 ± 2% at 16 years. Freedom from autograft and pulmonary homograft reoperation was 74.5 ± 4.3% at 16 years. Preoperative aortic regurgitation was the only significant predictor of autograft failure over time. Freedom from the combined end point of bleeding/thromboembolism/endocarditis/reoperation was 69.2 ± 4% at 16 years. Perioperative mortality following reoperation was 2.6% and the autograft could be spared in 72% of reinterventions.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ross operation in young adults is associated with an excellent survival in the long term that is comparable with the general population. Although there is a risk of reoperation, incidence of other valve-related events is very low. The use of pulmonary autograft should be considered in any young adult patient requiring aortic valve replacement.

A multicentre evaluation of the autograft procedure for young patients undergoing aortic valve replacement: update on the German Ross Registry†

OBJECTIVES

Conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) in young, active patients represents a suboptimal solution in terms of long-term survival, durability and quality of life. The aim of the present work is to present an update on the multicentre experience with the pulmonary autograft procedure in young, adult patients.

METHODS

Between 1990-2013, 1779 adult patients (1339 males; 44.7 ± 11.6 years) underwent the pulmonary autograft procedure in 8 centres. All patients underwent prospective clinical and echocardiographic examinations annually. The mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.1 years (range 0-24.3 years) with a total cumulative follow-up of 14 288 years and 662 patients having a follow-up of at least 10 years.

RESULTS

The early (30-day) mortality rate was 1.1% (n = 19). Late (>30 day) survival of the adult population was comparable with the age- and gender-matched general population (observed deaths: 101, expected deaths: 91; P = 0.29). Freedom from autograft reoperation at 5, 10 and 15 years was 96.8, 94.7 and 86.7%, respectively, whereas freedom from homograft reoperation was 97.6, 95.5 and 92.3%, respectively. The overall freedom from reoperation was 94.9, 91.1 and 82.7%, respectively. Longitudinal modelling of functional valve performance revealed a low (<5%) probability of a patient being in higher autograft regurgitation grades throughout the first decade. Similarly, excellent homograft function was observed throughout the first 15 years.

CONCLUSION

The autograft principle results in postoperative long-term survival comparable with that of the age- and gender-matched general population and reoperation rates within the 1%/patient-year boundaries and should be considered in young, active patients who want to avoid the shortcomings of conventional prostheses.

The Ross procedure: total root technique

We describe our technique for the Ross procedure using a total root technique without any foreign material for autograft support. We insist on technical principles, based on the surgical anatomy of the aortic and pulmonary root, aimed at optimizing aortic root dynamics while ensuring long-term stability of the autograft root.

The Ross procedure using autologous support of the pulmonary autograft: techniques and late results

OBJECTIVES

It is hypothesized that by performing radical aortic root manipulation and then autologous support for the pulmonary autograft in the Ross procedure, this will maintain aortic root size and should, in turn, lead to the demonstrated low incidence of late aortic regurgitation and need for reoperation on the aortic root and valve.

METHODS

Aortic root size was measured echocardiographically both preoperatively and then at second yearly intervals in 322 consecutive patients who underwent a Ross operation between October 1992 and June 2013 with autologous support of the pulmonary autograft root using the patient's own aorta. This technique, a variant of the inclusion cylinder method, has been developed with the aim of minimizing prosthetic materials in the aortic root.

RESULTS

Measures to reduce aortic root size included annulus reduction in 201 patients (62.4%) and reduction in aortic sinus or sinotubular junction in 159 patients (49.4%). Maximal aortic root diameter postoperatively at 5, 10, and 15 years was 34.0, 34.6, and 34.7 mm, respectively. Eleven reoperations were required during the study period for progressive aortic regurgitation (none for aortic root enlargement), with freedom from reoperation being 96% at both 15 years and 18 years. Preoperative pure aortic regurgitation, aortic annulus, and sinotubular junction enlargement were risk factors for reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

This inclusion method of pulmonary autograft implantation leads to minimal increases in aortic root size over time, with no reoperations for aortic root dilatation and a low requirement for aortic valve reoperation. The Ross procedure deserves to remain on the surgical menu for aortic valve replacement.

The Ross procedure: suitable for everyone?

In 1967, Donald Ross transferred the patient's own pulmonary valve into the aortic root. Although results of this technique were encouraging, the Ross procedure did not gain widespread popularity until the late 1980s when surgeons started to implant the pulmonary autograft as a freestanding full root replacement with reimplantation of the coronary arteries. However, frequent dilatation of the pulmonary autograft was observed using the freestanding full root replacement technique. In contrast, the original subcoronary implantation technique and aortic root inclusion technique prevented dilatation in the long-term. Through advancing know-how in aortic root surgery and confidence, the Ross procedure has also been used in combined procedures and complex clinical presentations with good long-term results, which encourage continual use. However, the Ross procedure is a complex operation; careful patient selection and experience of the surgeon are mandatory requirements to achieve satisfactory results.

Long-term results of the Ross operation: an 18-year single institutional experience

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of the study was to assess the 18-year outcome of the Ross operation (RO), with emphasis on survival, reoperations, and late function of the pulmonary autografts (PAs) and the right-sided pulmonary allografts.

METHODS

Between May 1995 to July 2013, 414 patients with a mean age (mean ± standard deviation) of 30.8 ± 13.1 years were submitted to an RO with the root replacement (n = 356) or the inclusion (n = 58) technique. The most prevalent aetiology was bicuspid valve (n = 206, 49.8%). Patients were divided in four groups depending on the type of allograft used on the right side. The mean follow-up was 8.2 ± 5.2 years and was 97.7% complete. In addition to longitudinal outcomes determined by means of the Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis were used to identify predictors of valve failure.

RESULTS

The early mortality rate was 2.7% and the late survival rate was 89.3% at 15 years, similar to an age- and sex-matched population. There were 22 reoperations on the PA (90.7% freedom at 15 years) and 15 on the pulmonary allografts (92.5% freedom at 15 years). The freedom rate from more than mild aortic insufficiency (AI) was 73.1% at 15 years. Thirty-three patients presented with a late root diameter >45 mm, corresponding to a freedom rate of 72.4% at 15 years. Patients with AI and a dilated annulus, especially males, are at greater risk for these complications. Among the right-sided allografts, fresh decellularized allografts showed significantly superior freedom from structural valve dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

The RO was associated with excellent long-term survival and low incidence of reoperations up to 15 years. Male patients with AI and dilated annulus are at increased risk for late insufficiency and root dilatation. Fresh decellularized allografts presented the best results for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract.