Survival benefits of postoperative chemoradiation for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Accurate location describe and management of lymph node recurrence after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Describe the accurate locations of lymph node recurrence (LNR) of Chinese patients with postoperative thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is essential for determining the need for further surveillance protocols and treatments. The authors aimed to evaluate the patterns of postoperative ESCC and its current risk stratification with LNR.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included a retrospective review of the medical records and image material of patients with ESCC who underwent LNR after radical surgery between January 2013 and September 2022, with a median follow-up time of 5.71 years. Clinical features were extracted from these records, and survival analysis was performed. The primary endpoint was the accurate location and range of LNR according to the nomenclature of the Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. The second endpoints was to explore the related factors of recurrence range and overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 3268 lymph node regions were recurrence from 1129 patients, with a mean of 2.89 regions per patient. No.104, 106, and 107 was the most common recurrence of thoracic ESCC with an LNR rate higher than 15%. In upper thoracic ESCC, No.105 was a common recurrence site and abdominal LNR was rare. In lower thoracic ESCC, retroperitoneal lymph node was a unique regions (15.4%). Anastomotic recurrence is an important recurrence pattern in patients with postoperative esophageal cancer, with an incidence of 24.5%. Rates of LNR in range of lymph node dissection was low (13.9%). The median time of LRT was 20.0 (1.5-184.0) months. High range of recurrence was associated with significantly poorer OS in patients. Multiple linear regression analysis identified demonstrated N stage, tumor differentiation, adjuvant radiotherapy, and total lymph nodes removed were association with recurrence range for patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Supraclavicular and upper mediastinums lymph nodes were common recurrence site for ESCC patients, and careful initial staging and surveillance are needed. Thorough lymph node dissection may reduce the range of regional recurrence.

The effectiveness of adjuvant treatment approaches for resectable esophageal cancer: A single-center experience

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

In general, neoadjuvant treatment is the standard for clinical stage II/III esophageal cancer (EC), whereas the effect of adjuvant treatment on survival still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant treatment modalities on the survival of EC patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 63 patients with stage II-IVA EC who had undergone curative surgery between the years 2002 and 2020 were included in the study. Patients' data were retrospectively collected from oncologic follow-up files. Various treatment regimens were administered during this period, including chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median age was 56 years (24-73), and the number of males was slightly higher than females (male/female: 33/30). While 32 (51%) patients received postoperative adjuvant treatment, the remaining 31 (49%) patients underwent surgery alone. The median overall survival (OS) was 45.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25.1-66.8) in patients receiving adjuvant therapy and 37.6 months (95% CI: 20.9-54.4) in patients not receiving adjuvant therapy. The 8.3-month survival difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.54). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 87.5% versus 77.4%, 58.4% versus 51.6%, and 40.8% versus 27.6% for patients with and without adjuvant therapy, respectively. Pathological stage (P = 0.028) and lymph node status (P = 0.044) were significant prognostic factors for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not support the benefit of adjuvant treatment compared with surgery alone in completely resected EC patients. The reason for this result may be related to the small sample size and different treatment regimens due to the change in treatment options over time.

Pattern of relapse following three-field lymphadenectomy of esophageal carcinoma and related factors predictive of recurrence

PURPOSE

For treatment of esophageal carcinoma, the optimal postoperative radiotherapy target volume after three-field lymph node dissection (3-FLD) had not been determined. We analyzed local recurrence pattern of thoracic esophageal carcinoma and risk factors of lymph node recurrence after 3-FLD without prophylactic radiotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We reviewed 1282 patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who were treated with 3-FLD without radiotherapy from 2010 to 2018 and analysed local recurrence patterns and risk factors of lymph node recurrence, in order to provide a reference for determination of the radiotherapy target volume for thoracic ESCC.

RESULTS

The lymph node recurrence accounted for 91.0% of treatment failures. The mediastinal, cervical and abdominal lymph node recurrence accounted for 84.92%, 36.07% and 22.30%, respectively (χ²=264.776, P=0.000). The superior, middle and inferior mediastinal lymph node recurrence rates were 67.54%, 27.87% and 0.98%, respectively (χ²=313.600, P=0.000). Cervical metastases were significantly associated with N stage and Preoperative cervical lymph node status. Abdominal metastases were significantly associated with the number of preoperative abdominal lymph node metastases (LNM), tumor location and N stage.

CONCLUSIONS

The main pattern of local-regional recurrence might be lymph node metastasis after radical 3-FLD without radiotherapy in esophageal carcinoma. The dangerous lymph node recurrence regions included neck, superior and middle mediastinum. The abdominal areas might be irradiated for lower TEC patients with preoperative abdominal LNM.

Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase II Clinical Trial

Background

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) covering partial regional lymph node areas combined with chemotherapy for locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Methods

This was a single-center, single-arm phase II clinical trial that began in 2014. Patients who underwent radical transthoracic resection within 3 months and were histologically confirmed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (pT3-4 or N+, M0 determined according to AJCC Guidelines, Edition 7) were recruited. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed with a total dose of 50.4Gy in 28 fractions using IMRT. Clinical target volumes (CTVs) included tumor bed, anastomosis, bilateral supraclavicular region, and superior mediastinal lymph nodes. Synchronous chemotherapy for 2 cycles (paclitaxel 150mg/m², day1; Cisplatin 25mg/m², day1-3; every 4 weeks), followed by 2 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy with the same regimen. The primary endpoint was the 2-year local control rate, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 75 eligible patients were included from 2014 to 2017. The 2-year LRFS rate, as the primary endpoint, was 73.3%. The 1-year and 3-year OS rates were 88.0% and 68.0%, respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 13/75 (17.4%) patients, of which 2.7% (2/75) were extra-target lymph nodes. Grade 4 adverse events reported in this study included 10 cases (13.3%) of neutropenia, 1 case (1.3%) of anemia, and 2 cases (2.7%) of thrombocytopenia, without toxic-related deaths. Almost all (96%) patients completed the entire postoperative radiotherapy course, and 62 (82.7%) patients completed at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Postoperative IMRT (clinical target volume including tumor bed, anastomosis, bilateral supraclavicular region, and superior mediastinal lymph nodes) combined with synchronous chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma was well tolerated, with a high local control rate and a low probability of recurrence outside the irradiation field.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ChiCTR1900022689.

Comparison of Two Major Staging Systems in Predicting Survival and Recommendation of Postoperative Radiotherapy Based on the 11th Japanese Classification for Esophageal Carcinoma After Curative Resection: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the prognostic predictive power of the 11th Japan Esophageal Society (JES) staging system with the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system in patients with thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC), and to estimate the survival benefits of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) based on a substage of the JES staging system.

METHODS

Area under the curve (AUC) values of the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated to evaluate prognostic efficacy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance the two groups (surgery only [S group] or surgery plus PORT [S+RT group]) across substages of the 11th JES staging system according to independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) identified using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 2960 patients were eligible. The 5-year OS AUC for the 8th AJCC staging system was significantly higher than that for the 11th JES staging system (0.701 vs. 0.675, p < 0.001). Before PSM, PORT significantly improved 5-year OS rates for patients in stage III and IVA by 9.1% (p < 0.001) and 21.1% (p < 0.001), respectively. After PSM, the 5-year OS rates in stage II, III, and IVA of the S+RT group were significantly higher than those in the S group (70.9%, 39.7%, and 35.1% vs. 57.8%, 27.2%, and 10.3%, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The 11th JES staging system was less capable of predicting prognosis than the 8th AJCC staging system and patients in stage III of the JES staging system were highly recommended to undergo PORT.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: An Analysis of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Database

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary management strategies are standard in esophageal cancer. Based on a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) database in a high-volume center, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and patient outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. In addition, we determined the impact of MTB discussions on patient prognosis.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The pattern of treatment modalities and overall survival (OS) of patients with limited, locally advanced, and advanced/metastatic disease were reported.

RESULTS

Data from 1132 patients, including 247 patients with limited esophageal cancer, 606 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, and 279 patients with advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer were included. Upfront surgery was the most common (56.3%) treatment modality for patients with limited esophageal cancer, while treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer included upfront surgery (19.1%), neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (44.9%), and definitive chemoradiotherapy (36.0%); however, 27.9% of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy did not receive planned esophagectomy. Definitive chemoradiotherapy was mainly used for patients with locally advanced and advanced/metastatic disease, but had an incompletion rate of 22.0% and 33.7%, respectively. Regarding survival, the 5-year OS rates were 56.4%, 26.3%, and 5.1% in patients with limited, locally advanced, and advanced/metastatic disease, respectively. Additionally, patients whose clinical management was discussed in the MTB had a significantly better 5-year OS rate than the other patients (27.3% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

We report the real-world data of treatment patterns and patient outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer with respect to multidisciplinary management, and demonstrate the positive impact of MTB discussions on patient prognosis.

Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy Versus Surgery Alone for Stage IIB-III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies have shown that adjuvant treatment improves survival of patients with stage IIB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, but there is no evidence from prospective trials so far.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with pathological stage IIB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone (SA), postoperative radiotherapy (PORT), or postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (POCRT). PORT patients received 54 Gy in 27 fractions; the POCRT group received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, plus concurrent chemotherapy with paclitaxel (135-150 mg/m² ) and cisplatin or nedaplatin (50-75 mg/m² ) every 28 days. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 172 patients were enrolled (SA, n = 54; PORT, n = 54; POCRT, n = 64). The 3-year DFS was significantly better in PORT/POCRT patients than in SA patients (53.8% vs. 36.7%; p = .020); the 3-year OS was also better in PORT/POCRT patients (63.9% vs. 48.0%; p = .025). The 3-year DFS for SA, PORT, and POCRT patients were 36.7%, 50.0%, 57.3%, respectively (p = .048). The 3-year OS for SA, PORT, and POCRT patients were 48.0%, 60.8%, 66.5%, respectively (p = .048).

CONCLUSION

PORT/POCRT (especially POCRT) may significantly improve DFS and OS in stage IIB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The results of this phase III study indicated that postoperative radiotherapy/postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (PORT/POCRT) could significantly improve disease-free survival and overall survival in stage IIB-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma compared with surgery alone with acceptable toxicities. In-field and out-of-field recurrences were comparable between the POCRT and PORT groups, which demonstrates the rationality and safety of the radiation field used in this study. The postoperative regimens in this trial might be accepted as standard treatment options for pathological stage IIB-III esophageal cancer. Larger sample size prospective randomized trials to identify the value are warranted.

Impact of chemotherapy on prognosis of resectable pathological T3N0M0 esophageal cancer patients: a population-based study

Aims: This study aimed to retrospectively determine the influence factors and survival effects of chemotherapy in pathological T3N0M0 esophageal cancer (EC) patients based on histological type. Methods: A total of 1136 pathological T3N0M0 EC patients who had surgery were chosen from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. The patients were divided into subgroups based on histological type and chemotherapy status. Multivariate logistic regression, log-rank test and Cox regression were used to identify prognostic risk factors and survival differences. A propensity score matching analysis was applied to adjust the covariates. The impact of additional chemotherapy was also assessed in patients who had postoperative radiotherapy. Results: The 5-year overall survival was 36.4% for all patients. Chemotherapy was an independent protective factor of survival in both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma patients. In the survival analysis, chemotherapy significantly improved the prognosis of EC patients, both for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Propensity score matching analysis validated these results. Conclusion: Chemotherapy is recommended for pathological T3N0M0 EC patients regardless of histological type.

Adjuvant Radiotherapy of Involved Field versus Elective Lymph Node in Patients with Operable Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Single Institution Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Background: To evaluate locoregional failure and its impact on survival by comparing involved field irradiation (IFI) with elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) for patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer who underwent post-operative radiotherapy.

Methods and Materials: The enrolled patients were randomized allocated to IFI or ENI group. CTV of IFI was generated according to pre-operative primary tumor location and post-operative pathological characters and positive LNs regions. CTV of ENI was generated according to pre-operative tumor position to administer selective lymph node irradiation. Radiotherapy planning was delivered using either 3D-CRT or IMRT.

Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled, 28 patients in ENI group and 29 patients in IFI group. There were not statistical differences between two groups in baseline (p>0.05). The initial locoregional failure rate was 17.9 % in ENI arm and 20.7% in IFI arm respectively (p=0.085). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year Progression-free Survival (PFS) were 63.2, 43.5, and 21.8 % in ENI arm versus 78.2, 60.1, and 55.1% in IFI arm (p =0.038). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) were 78.6, 46.9, and 23.5 % in ENI arm versus 72.9, 59.7, and 54.3 % in IFI arm (p=0.06). Acute radiation pneumonitis (p=0.005) and hematological toxicities (p =0.029) also showed statistical differences between groups, ENI arm was more than IFI arm.

Conclusions: The results indicated that IFI tended to improve survival and reduce toxicities for patients with operative ESCC and did not increase locoregional failure compared to ENI. It is thus suggested that IFI for ESCC PORT is worthy of clinical recommendation and further study.

Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Staging and Multimodal Therapy of Esophageal and Gastric Tumors

Gastric and esophageal tumors are diverse neoplasms that involve mucosal and submucosal tissue layers and include squamous cell carcinomas, adenocarcinomas, spindle cell neoplasms, neuroendocrine tumors, marginal B cell lymphomas, along with less common tumors. The worldwide burden of esophageal and gastric malignancies is significant, with esophageal and gastric cancer representing the ninth and fifth most common cancers, respectively. The approach to diagnosis and staging of these lesions is multimodal and includes a combination of gastrointestinal endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and cross-sectional imaging. Likewise, therapy is multidisciplinary and combines therapeutic endoscopy, surgery, radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapeutic tools. Future directions for diagnosis of esophageal and gastric malignancies are evolving rapidly and will involve advances in endoscopic and endosonographic techniques including tethered capsules, optical coherence tomography, along with targeted cytologic and serological analyses.

Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy for Patients with pN+ Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common pathological type of esophageal cancer in China. However, patient survival time after surgery remains unsatisfactory, especially in those who are pN+. This retrospective study determined the value of postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with pN+ ESCC. From Jan 2008 to Sep 2011, 453 pN+ ESCC patients who underwent R0 resection and survived for at least 1 month were retrospectively enrolled. All patients received surgery. Some patients received surgery alone (SA, n = 131), and others received postoperative chemotherapy (POCT, n = 222), radiotherapy (PORT, n = 57), or sequential chemoradiotherapy (POCRT, n = 43). The follow-up ended on 1 Dec 2019. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional recurrence (LR) were significantly worse in the SA group (15.2%, 13.1%, and 71.6%, all p < 0.05) than in the POCT group (28.0%, 20.8%, and 66.5%), the PORT group (27.4%, 24.4%, and 46.9%), and the POCRT group (42.8%, 35.5%, and 43.0%). Furthermore, compared with the SA group, the median OS and DFS were significantly longer in the POCT, PORT, and POCRT groups (all p < 0.05). PORT and POCRT (but not POCT) also significantly reduced the LR (p < 0.01). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that each type of postoperative therapy was independently associated with improvements in OS, DFS, and LR. Postoperative adjuvant therapy—either POCT, PORT, or POCRT—significantly improved OS and DFS in patients with pN+ ESCC after R0 surgery. PORT and PORCT significantly reduced LR in these patients.

Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with pathologic node-positive esophageal cancer following radical resection is associated with improved survival

Background

Depending on the pathological stage, patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) can experience poor prognosis after surgery. This study was designed to analyze the effect of various treatments on prognosis in pathologic node-positive esophageal cancer patients who undergo radical surgery.

Methods

We evaluated 210 pathologic stage IIb–IIIc patients (pT1-4aN + M0) who had undergone esophagectomy for thoracic ESCC from January 2013 to October 2015 at our institute. Surgery alone was applied in 65 patients, postoperative chemotherapy alone was applied in 112 patients, and postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was applied in 33 patients. Kaplan­-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A nomogram was constructed to visualize the multivariate Cox regression analysis model.

Results

The median follow-up period was 49.4 months. The 3- and 5-year OS rates of the patients in the surgery group, postoperative chemotherapy group, postoperative chemoradiotherapy group were 55.4%, 61.6%, and 75.8%, and 30.1%, 44.0%, and 63.0% respectively. The 3- and 5-year DFS rates of the patients in the surgery group, postoperative chemotherapy group, postoperative chemoradiotherapy group were 44.6%, 52.7%, and 72.7%, and 20.0%, 24.1%, and 39.4%, respectively. Both the OS and DFS of the patients in the postoperative chemoradiotherapy group were better than those of the patients in the surgery and postoperative chemotherapy group. Among them, the OS of the postoperative radiotherapy group was longer than that of the surgery group (P=0.011) and the postoperative chemotherapy group (P=0.190), while the DFS of postoperative chemoradiotherapy group was longer than that of the surgery group and postoperative chemotherapy group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusions

This study showed that postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy could improve 3-year OS and DFS compared with treatment using surgery alone or postoperative chemotherapy alone. However, an evaluation of long-term prognosis requires a longer follow-up.

Timing of Adjuvant Chemoradiation in pT1-3N1-2 or pT4aN1 Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After R0 Esophagectomy

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy (aCRT) have been supposed to improve prognosis and outcomes in patients with node-positive thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC). Our aim was to analyze the impacts of interval between surgery and aCRT on prognosis, determining the optimal time interval.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 520 patients with TESCC between 2007 and 2015 treated with aCRT following radical esophagectomy without neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT. These patients underwent RT (50-60 Gy) combined with 2-6 cycles chemotherapy after surgery. The time intervals were from 17 days to 145 days and divided into three groups: short interval group (≤28 days, S-Int group), medial interval group (≥29 and ≤ 56 days, M-Int group) and long interval group (≥57 days, L-Int group).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 35.6 months and the 3-, 5-year survival rates and median survival were 49.5%, 36.6% and 35.9 months. The duration of postoperative interval was a predictor of survival outcomes. The median survival and 5-year survival rates in S-Int, M-Int and L-Int groups were 23.6 (32.1%), 44.2 (43.3%) and 32.0 (31.5%) months (P=0.007). The difference was statistically significant between the M-Int and S-Int or L-Int group but was not between the S-Int and L-Int group. Besides, toxic reactions including early, late and adverse events (grade ≥3) in M-Int group were significantly less than S-Int and show no significant differences with L-Int group.

CONCLUSION

The optimal time interval was from 29 days to 56 days (5-8 weeks) both in terms of survival outcomes and toxic reactions.

Risk Factors and Patterns of Abdominal Lymph Node Recurrence After Radical Surgery for Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer

Background

We aimed to identify the suitable indication and delineate the target volume based on the pattern of abdominal lymph node recurrence (ALNR) after radical surgery for guiding postoperative radiotherapy in thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer (TESCC).

Methods

Clinical data of patients with locally advanced TESCC after radical surgery without perioperative anti-tumor therapies from June 2011 to June 2016 were reviewed. Logistic regression analysis was used to find out the high-risk factors of ALNR. The pattern of ALNR was analysed and a template CT in the Pinnacle treatment plan system was used to reconstruct the distribution of the sites of ALNR.

Results

A total of 63 (19.57%) patients with 276 lymph nodes of ALNR were identified in 322 patients. Univariate logistic regression indicated that pathological tumor location, width of tumor, T stage, N stage, TNM stage, ratio of lymph node metastasis (LNM), vessel carcinoma embolus, cancerous node, LNM in the middle and lower mediastinum, LNM in the abdominal region, ratio of LNM in the abdominal region were risk factors of ALNR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only LNM in the abdominal region was an independent risk factor. The odds ratio was 7.449 (95% CI=2.552–22.297, P<0.001). Station 16a2, station 9, station 16b1, and station 8 were the major regions of ALNR. The recurrence rates were 10.56%, 9.63%, 7.14% and 5.28% in these stations, respectively.

Conclusion

Positive pathological abdominal lymph nodes should be the major indication for abdominal irradiation in postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced TESCC. We recommended that the target volume includes station 8, station 9, station 16a2 and station 16b1 and proposed a specific delineation of the clinical target volume based on the distribution of ALNR on template CT images.

The Role of Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Margin-Positive (R1) Esophagectomy: A National Analysis

BACKGROUND

We performed a nationwide analysis to assess the impact of adjuvant therapy on survival after a microscopically margin-positive (R1) resection for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with R1 resection for esophageal cancer (2004-2015). Patients were grouped by type of adjuvant therapy. Patients who had other margin status, M1 disease, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, missing survival, and no or unknown treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was overall survival. A 1:1 propensity score-matched sensitivity analysis was also performed comparing patients who received no adjuvant therapy with those who received adjuvant chemoradiation.

RESULTS

Of 546 patients, 279 (51%) received adjuvant therapy and 267 (49%) did not. Patients receiving adjuvant therapy were more likely to be younger, have more advanced pathologic stage, have nonsquamous histology, and have shorter hospitalization. In multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and chemoradiation were all associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy. In a propensity score-matched analysis of 123 patient pairs, adjuvant chemoradiation was associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy (adjusted HR: 0.30; 95% CI: [0.22, 0.40]).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant therapy is associated with improved survival compared with no adjuvant therapy in patients with R1 resection for esophageal cancer even after adjustment for pathologic stage. Adjuvant therapy should be considered in patients with incompletely resected esophageal cancer in concordance with national guidelines.

A phase-II/III randomized controlled trial of adjuvant radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy after surgery versus surgery alone in patients with stage-IIB/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery is the most common approach for patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Nevertheless, considerable numbers of esophageal-cancer patients undergo surgery as the first treatment. The benefit of neoadjuvant therapy might only be for patients with a pathologic complete response, so stratified research is necessary. Postoperative treatments have important roles because of the poor survival rates of patients with stage-IIB/III disease treated with resection alone. Five-year survival of patients with stage-IIB/III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) after surgery is 20.0–28.4%, and locoregional lymph-node metastases are the main cause of failure. Several retrospective studies have shown that postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and postoperative chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) after radical esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma with positive lymph-node metastases and stage-III disease can decrease locoregional recurrence and increase overall survival (OS). Using intensity-modulated RT, PORT reduces locoregional recurrence further. However, the rate of distant metastases increases to 30.7%. Hence, chemotherapy may be vital for these patients. Therefore, a prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) is needed to evaluate the value of PORT and concurrent POCRT in comparison with surgery alone (SA) for esophageal cancer.

Method

This will be a phase-II/III RCT. The patients with pathologic stage-IIB/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma will receive concurrent POCRT or PORT after radical esophagectomy compared with those who have SA. A total of 120 patients in each group will be recruited. POCRT patients will be 50.4 Gy concurrent with paclitaxel (135–150 mg/m²) plus cisplatin or nedaplatin (50–75 mg/m²) treatment every 28 days. Two cycles will be required for concurrent chemotherapy. The prescription dose will be 54 Gy for PORT. The primary endpoint will be disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoint will be OS. Other pre-specified outcome measures will be the proportion of patients who complete treatment, toxicity, and out-of-field regional recurrence rate between PORT and POCRT.

Discussion

This prospective RCT will provide high-level evidence for postoperative adjuvant treatment of pathologic stage-IIB/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Trial registration

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02279134). Registered on October 26, 2014.

Radical esophagectomy for stage II and III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma followed by adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: Which is more beneficial?

Background

This retrospective study compared the efficacy and side effect profile between postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in stage II or stage III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC) patients who underwent curative (R0) esophagectomy.

Methods

A total of 272 TESCC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy from 2007 to 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. All cases were pathologically confirmed with stage II or III disease and 148 patients received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), while the remaining 124 patients received postoperative radiotherapy (RT) alone.

Results

In CRT and RT groups, the three‐year overall survival rates were 51.3 versus 31.5% (P < 0.01) and the median overall survival (OS) was 39 months (95% CI, 31.6 to 46.3 months) and 30 months (95% CI, 21.0 to 38.9 months), respectively (P = 0.213). Three‐year disease‐free survival rates (DFS) were 30.5% versus 15.9% (P = 0.008), while the median DFS times were 26 months (95% CI, 17.7 to 34.3 months) and 19 months (95% CI, 16.4 to 21.6 months), respectively (P = 0.156). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh edition) stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for overall survival, while the N stage was an independent prognostic factor for disease‐free survival.

Conclusions

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy led to one‐ and three‐year overall survival benefits along with an obvious increase in treatment side effects for stage II to III TESCC patients, with no further improvement in five‐year survival. However, the chemoradiotherapy benefits mainly favor stage III,number of resected lymph nodes less than 15, younger (less than 60 years old) and smoking patients.

Difference in failure patterns of pT3-4N0-3M0 esophageal cancer treated by surgery vs surgery plus radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

There has been no study comparing the difference in the failure patterns between patients with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after esophagectomy for pT3-4N0-3M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

AIM

To investigate the difference in the failure patterns of stage pT3-4N0-3M0 ESCC patients with or without PORT.

METHODS

Patients with stage pT3-4N0-3M0 ESCC, who underwent surgery with or without PORT, were enrolled in this study. The primary endpoint was to investigate the difference in the failure patterns between patients with or without PORT after esophagectomy. The secondary endpoint was to estimate whether patients with stage pT3-4 ESCC could achieve a disease-free survival (DFS) advantage after receiving adjuvant PORT. Statistical analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method, Cox regression model, and Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test.

RESULTS

In total, 230 patients with stage pT3-4N0-3M0 ESCC were included in this study. Fifty-six patients who received PORT were screened from a prospective cohort (S + R arm). And 174 patients involving surgery alone were retrospectively selected from July 2006 to October 2014 (S arm). There were no significant differences in the clinical or pathological characteristics of patients between the two arms, except for tumor location (P = 0.031). The failure patterns between the two arms were significantly different (P < 0.001). Patients in the S arm had a significantly higher proportion of locoregional recurrence and a lower proportion of distant metastasis than those in the S + R arm (92.0% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001 and 19.0% vs 75.0%, P < 0.001, respectively). The difference in the median DFS between the two arms was statistically significant (12.7 vs 8 mo, P = 0.048). Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis both demonstrated that the number of lymph node metastases ≥ 3 (HR = 0.572, 95%CI: 0.430-0.762, P < 0.001) was an independent poor prognostic factor for DFS in patients with stage pT3-4N0-3M0 ESCC.

CONCLUSION

PORT could improve DFS and local control of patients with stage pT3-4N0-3M0 ESCC. However, further studies need to be conducted to control hematogenous metastasis after PORT.

A propensity-score matching analysis comparing long-term survival of surgery alone and postoperative treatment for patients in node positive or stage III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after R0 esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Surveillance was recommended for patients after R0 esophagectomy by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, local failure was high in locally advanced patients (48-78%). The present study aimed to determine whether adjuvant treatment improved survival for stage IIb-III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (TESCC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients diagnosed as esophageal carcinoma at the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Cancer hospital, between January 2004 and December 2011, was performed. A database compiling 975 patents with node positive or stage III thoracic esophageal carcinoma after R0 surgery with or without postoperative radiation/chemoradiation was created. A 1:1 matched study group was generated by the Greedy method after propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

975 patients were enrolled in the study, 510 patients (52.3%) did not receive any postoperative treatment after R0 surgery and 465 patients had either postoperative chemoradiation or radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 69.2 months. After PSM, 222 well-balanced patients in each group demonstrated the same results. The 3-year, 5-year survival rates and median survival in surgery group (33.0%, 26.4%, 24.3 months) were inferior to those in postoperative treatment group (48.3%, 37.1% and 34.3 months), (P = 0.002). Compared with radiotherapy, postoperative chemoradiation did not improve DFS and OS (P = 0.692; P = 0.368). N stage and adjuvant treatment are independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant treatment could improve survival for patients with stage IIb-III TESCC.

Post-esophagectomy Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefits Esophageal Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND/AIM

Postoperative chemotherapy is an absolutely imperative treatment for advanced esophageal cancer patients, while preoperative chemotherapy is the standard therapy for clinical stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan. The aim of this study was to report the effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival after esophagectomy due to thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred thirteen consecutive patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy were included. Several regiments were performed at various times.

RESULTS

Adjuvant chemotherapy brought a significantly superior overall survival (p=0.002), although there was no significant difference in cancer-specific survival (p=0.054) for clinical stage II or stage III esophageal cancer patients. Depth of invasion (p=0.003), number of lymph node metastases (p=0.048), and venous invasion (p<0.001) were risk factors for recurrence in the adjuvant-chemotherapy group with positive lymph nodes. Additionally, a not well-differentiated type, lymphatic and venous invasions were risk factors for recurrence in the surgery-alone group without positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy contributes to the prognosis of clinical stage II or III esophageal cancer patients.

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and prognosis in Taiwan

The prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is poor. In order to find out appropriate treatment for each group of patients, we aim to examine the prognostic factors influencing survival for esophageal cancer patients in Taiwan. Data were obtained from the Taiwan Society of Cancer Registry. There were 14,394 esophageal cancer patients analyzed between 2008 and 2014 in this retrospective review. The impact of the clinicopathologic factors on overall survival was assessed. The following clinic‐pathologic factors were included to analyses: age, sex, tumor location, tumor length, histologic grade, clinical T, clinical N, clinical M, clinical stage, and all therapeutic methods within 3 months after diagnosis. The 5‐year survival rate was 16.8%, with a median survival of 343 days. The distribution of patients by their clinical stage is as follows: stage 0 (n = 162; 1.1%); stage I (n = 964; 6.7%); stage II (n = 2392; 16.6%); stage III (n = 6636; 46.1%); and stage IV (n = 3661; 25.4%). In the multivariate analysis, age, sex, tumor location, tumor length, clinical T, clinical N, clinical M, and treatment remained independent prognostic factors. Our data indicated that age, sex, tumor location, tumor length, clinical T, clinical N, clinical M, and treatment remained independent prognostic factors. Patients who could receive surgery had significantly better outcomes.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy for radically resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for radical resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether PORT achieves survival benefit compared with surgery alone (S alone) for radically resected ESCC.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant articles. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), reported as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Six randomized trials and 13 retrospective studies that included a total of 8,198 patients were eligible. PORT provided significant OS benefit compared with S alone in retrospective studies (HR =0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.85), but not in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (HR =0.94, 95% CI: 0.81-1.09). PORT was associated with significantly improved DFS and obvious reduction in the risk of locoregional recurrence compared to S alone in either retrospective studies or RCTs. In the subgroup analysis for retrospective studies, PORT gained superior OS in patients with lymph node-positive (pN+), patients with lymph node-negative (pN0) or pT2-3N0, PORT with three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-RT), PORT with chemotherapy, and patients with R0 resection, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that PORT can improve DFS and decrease risk of locoregional recurrence in patients with radically resected ESCC, and PORT using 3D-RT or in combination with chemotherapy is likely to be more useful. Further well-designed, prospective studies are needed to confirm the effect of PORT on OS.

Long-term outcomes of 530 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The short-term benefits of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) Ivor Lewis were proved, but 6-year outcomes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients remain unclear. We sought to investigate perioperative outcomes, quality of life (QOL), survival and impact of adjuvant therapy in ESCC patients who underwent MIE Ivor Lewis.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 530 ESCC patients treated with MIE Ivor Lewis from 2011 to 2016. Relevant variables were collected and assessed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier or Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Median operation duration was 266 min. The median number of lymph nodes was 28. The 30-day postoperative mortality was 1.7%. At a median follow-up of 41 months, the 6-year OS and DFS were 44.7% and 46.1%. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy offered survival advantages in advanced stage patients. Pathological tumor-node-metastasis stage, postoperative complications, and recurrent laryngeal nerve lymphadenectomy were independent prognostic factors based on multivariate analysis. Generalized estimating equation analysis showed a rapid postoperative QOL improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

MIE Ivor Lewis is a safe and feasible procedure in ESCC patients. It offers satisfactory perioperative outcomes, rapid QOL improvement, and acceptable long-term oncologic survival. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may improve OS and DFS in advanced stage patients.

Nomogram and recursive partitioning analysis to predict overall survival in patients with stage IIB-III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after esophagectomy

We have developed statistical models for predicting survival in patients with stage IIB-III thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and assessing the efficacy of adjuvant treatment. From a retrospective review of 3,636 patients, we created a database of 1,004 patients with stage IIB-III thoracic ESCC who underwent esophagectomy with or without postoperative radiation. Using a multivariate Cox regression model, we assessed the prognostic impact of clinical and histological factors on overall survival (OS). Logistic analysis was performed to identify factors to include in a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) to predict 5-year OS. The nomogram was evaluated internally based on the concordance index (C-index) and a calibration plot. The median survival time in the training dataset was 30.9 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 33.9%. T stage, differentiated grade, adjuvant treatment, tumor location, lymph node metastatic ratio (LNMR), and the presence of vascular carcinomatous thrombi were statistically significant predictors of 5-year OS. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.70 (95% CI 0.67-0.73). RPA resulted in a three-class stratification: class 1, LNMR ≤ 0.15 with adjuvant treatment; class 2, LNMR ≤ 0.15 without adjuvant treatment and LNMR > 0.15 with adjuvant treatment; and class 3, LNMR > 0.15 without adjuvant treatment. The three classes were statistically significant for OS (P < 0.001). Thus, the nomogram and RPA models predicted the prognosis of stage IIB-III ESCC patients and could be used in decision-making and clinical trials.

The frontline of esophageal cancer treatment: questions to be asked and answered

Achieving a good treatment for esophageal cancer is a great challenge. For early stage cancer, endoscopic treatment is considered the first line and a possible curative therapy. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery are all used for the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, administered either alone or combined. Some combinations have proven to be feasible, effective, and superior, such as neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) plus surgery in the Chemoradiotherapy for Oesophageal Cancer Followed by Surgery Study (CROSS) trial. However, other strategies such as perioperative chemotherapy or definitive chemoradiation also have demonstrated substantial effectiveness. The current article addresses the following questions: (I) how can a choice between different multi-modality treatments be made; (II) is there enough evidence to compare the merits of the different strategies; and (III) is there any new evidence to improve the current practice. Moreover, in this article, existing evidence for treatment strategies for locally advanced esophageal cancer have been reviewed.

Role of Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Carcinoma: A meta-analysis of 2165 Patients

Purpose: This meta-analysis was aimed to evaluate the role of postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (post-CCRT) for esophageal cancer patients after surgery. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, PMC, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang databases. Studies which compared CCRT with non-CCRT treatment for esophageal cancer patients after surgery were eligible. Outcomes of interest were odds ratios (OR) for overall survival (OS), local-regional recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate and adverse-event rate. Results: Thirteen studies with 2165 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Post-CCRT significantly improved OS for esophageal cancer patients. Comparing the CCRT group with the non-CCRT one, the OR and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1-year, 3-year and 5-year OS were 1.66 [1.30-2.11], 1.50 [1.24-1.81] and 1.54 [1.22-1.94], respectively. The local-regional recurrence rate was significantly reduced in the CCRT group (OR=0.58, 95% CI=0.46-0.72), but no significant difference was observed in the distant metastasis rate between the CCRT and non-CCRT groups (OR=0.94, 95% CI=0.68-1.30). Post-CCRT didn't increase the risk of pneumonitis, anastomotic stenosis or severe hematologic toxicities. Mild esophagitis in the CCRT group was increased but could be well tolerated. Conclusions: This meta-analysis based on the largest-scale of published literature confirms that post-CCRT yields significant survival benefit and improves local-regional control with tolerable toxicity for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Meta-analysis of survival benefit with postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients of lymph node positive esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The effect of postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for esophageal carcinoma (EC) was investigated. Patients who can obtain benefit from this treatment modality have not yet been well identified.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for studies published from January 1993 to July 2016. Research comparing surgery alone (SA) with postoperative CRT in patients with resectable EC was procured; collected articles were written in English.

RESULTS

Nine studies comparing of postoperative CRT versus SA (n = 1650) in patients with resectable EC met the inclusion criteria. No survival benefit was achieved for postoperative CRT compared with SA. Subgroup analysis was conducted for patients under resection with positive lymph node carcinoma; there was a significant survival benefit at 1 year [risk ratio (RR) = 0.55 95% CI: 0.37-0.82; P = 0.003], 3 years (RR = 0.71 95% CI: 0.61-0.83; P<0.0001), as well as 5 years (RR = 0.86 95% CI: 0.78-0.94; P = 0.0007). Subgroup analysis by tumor histology of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was also performed, but there was no significant survival benefit when postoperative CRT was compared with SA. Fail models after surgery were performed; the RR for local control rate and distant metastasis rate were 0.64 (95% CI 0.49-0.85; P = 0.002) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.67-1.15; P = 0.34), which indicates lower local recurrence rates of post-CRT than that of SA.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrated a survival benefit of postoperative CRT over SA in resectable EC patients with positive lymph nodes. Improvements of local control rates with postoperative CRT were also detected.

Analysis of the causes of failure after radical surgery in patients with PT3N0M0 thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and consideration of postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Five-year overall survival rate of TESCC after surgery is low (approximately 30% to 60%), so it is meaningful to discuss the significance of PORT.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the data of 227 patients with _PT₃N₀M₀ esophageal cancer (EC). The failure pattern after surgery was analyzed. Difference of adjuvant PORT in patients with _PT₃N₀M₀ TESCC and the appropriate population were explored based on the relevant studies.

RESULTS

There were 58 cases with intrathoracic locoregional recurrence (LRR) after radical surgery and 27 cases with distant metastasis, including 10 cases of recurrence. The recurrence rate of mediastinal lymph nodes in the thoracic cavity was 50.0%. Univariate analysis revealed that compared with patients with middle and lower thoracic EC, the 3/5-year survival rate of patients with upper thoracic EC was significantly lower, accompanied with remarkably higher thoracic LRR. Compared with those with moderately- and well-differentiated TESCC, the 3/5-year survival rate of patients with poorly differentiated TESCC was significantly lower, whereas the distant metastasis rate was notably higher. Multivariate analysis revealed that different lesion locations and different pathologic differentiation were the independent prognostic factors. The lesion location and degree of differentiation were the independent influencing factors for thoracic LRR and distant metastasis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The intrathoracic LRR is the major failure pattern for patients with _PT₃N₀M₀ TESCC after conventional two-field lymphadenectomy. In addition, recurrence rate of _PT₃N₀M₀ TESCC was significantly higher in upper thoracic EC than in middle and lower thoracic EC. PORT is recommended to patients with _PT₃N₀M₀ upper TESCC.

The Impact of Adjuvant Postoperative Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy on Survival After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to analyze the impact on overall survival (OS) from the addition of postoperative radiation with or without chemotherapy after esophagectomy, using a large, hospital-based dataset.

BACKGROUND

Previous retrospective studies have suggested an OS advantage for postoperative chemoradiation over surgery alone, although prospective data are lacking.

METHODS

The National Cancer Data Base was queried to select patients diagnosed with stage pT3-4Nx-0M0 or pT1-4N1-3M0 esophageal carcinoma (squamous cell or adenocarcinoma) from 1998 to 2011 treated with definitive esophagectomy ± postoperative radiation and/or chemotherapy. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify covariates associated with OS.

RESULTS

There were 4893 patients selected, of whom 1153 (23.6%) received postoperative radiation. Most patients receiving radiation also received sequential/concomitant chemotherapy (89.9%). For the entire cohort, postoperative radiation was associated with a statistically significant but modest absolute improvement in survival (hazard ratio 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83; P < 0.001). On subgroup analysis, postoperative radiation was associated with improved OS for patients with node-positive disease (3-yr OS 34.3 % vs 27.8%, P < 0.001) or positive margins (3-yr OS 36.4% vs 18.0%, P < 0.001). When chemotherapy usage was incorporated, sequential chemotherapy was associated with the best survival (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the addition of chemotherapy to radiation therapy, whether sequentially or concurrently, was a strong prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this hospital-based study, the addition of postoperative chemoradiation (either sequentially or concomitantly) after esophagectomy was associated with improved OS for patients with node-positive disease or positive margins.

Pathologic lymph node ratio is a predictor of esophageal carcinoma patient survival: a literature-based pooled analysis

The positive lymph node ratio (LNR) has been suggested as a predictor of survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). However, existed evidences did not completely agree with each other. We sought to examine whether LNR was associated with overall survival (OS). Electronic database was searched for eligible literatures. The primary outcome was the relationship between LNR and OS, which was presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 11.0 software. A total of 18 relevant studies which involved 7,664 cases were included. Patients with an LNR of 0.3 or greater had an increased risk of death compared to those with an LNR of less than 0.3(HR = 2.33; 95% CI 2.03-2.68; P<0.01). Similarly, patients with an LNR greater than 0.5 was also associated with a decreased OS(HR = 1.95; 95% CI 1.52-2.50; P<0.01). No publication bias was found. This meta-analysis confirmed that LNR was a significant predictor of survival in patients with EC and should be considered in prognostication.

Adjuvant Therapeutic Modalities Following Three-field Lymph Node Dissection for Stage II/III Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: The rates of locoregional and distant recurrence for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients underwent radical esophagectomy remain high. The purpose of this study is to explore an optimal postoperative therapeutic modality by investigating the efficacy of various adjuvant therapies in the treatment of ESCC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 408 ESCC patients underwent thoracic esophagectomy and 3-field lymph node dissection from 2010 to 2015. Patients were classified into surgery alone (Group S), adjuvant chemotherapy (Group CT) and postoperative chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (Group CRT), respectively. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to analyze prognostic factors and survival. Results: The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were similar among groups. Postoperative CT and CRT both were beneficial for patients with positive lymph nodes, particularly for those with 3 or more lymph nodes involvement and metastasis in the middle thoracic segment compared with surgery alone. The 3-year OS and DFS for patients with 3 or more lymph nodes involvement were 30.8%, 53.7%, 50.5% and 19.9%, 41.6%, 34.0% for Group S, CT, and CRT, respectively (p=0.04; p=0.004, respectively). There was no notable difference in OS and DFS between the adjuvant Group CT and CRT (p=0.42; p=0.49, respectively). Postoperative CRT significantly reduced the rates of distant metastasis and overall recurrence for patients with positive lymph nodes (p=0.042; p=0.01, respectively). Number of metastatic lymph nodes, extent of resection, and AJCC stage were independent predictors of survival. Grade 1-2 myelosuppression was experienced significantly more frequently by patients in Group CRT than those in Group CT (P=0.03). Late toxicities were rare and manageable overall. Conclusions: Postoperative CT and CRT both were associated with better survival for patients with positive lymph nodes, particularly for those with 3 or more lymph nodes involvement and metastasis in the middle thoracic segment. Postoperative CRT was significantly more effective at reducing the rates of distant metastasis and overall recurrence for patients with positive lymph nodes.

Phase II Trial of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Concurrent With Chemotherapy for Postoperative Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrent with weekly docetaxel in patients with node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after radical surgery. Between January 2011 and December 2013, a total of 46 eligible patients were enrolled. All patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrent with weekly docetaxel (20 mg/m²). Patients were treated 5 days per week at 2.0 Gy/day. The total dose of external radiotherapy given was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The primary endpoints included treatment completion and safety. The secondary endpoint was to assess whether the approach would achieve a 1-year survival rate of 80% or higher. The median duration of follow-up was 18 months (range: 2–41 months). The 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival rate were 91.2% and 80.4%, respectively. The major acute toxicities were esophagitis and neutropenia. While most cases were grade 1 or 2, grade 3 neutropenia and esophagitis were observed in seven (15.2%) and five patients (10.9%), respectively. The toxicities were controllable and transitory. There were no unexpected cases of serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths. Our study confirms that intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent weekly docetaxel is an effective and safe treatment in postoperative node-positive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The identified treatment regimen is of interest for a phase III trial.

Patterns of recurrence after oesophagectomy and postoperative chemoradiotherapy versus surgery alone for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patterns of recurrence after surgery with postoperative chemoradiotherapy (S-CCRT) or surgery alone in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) may differ. This might influence the nature and timing of subsequent management strategies.

METHODS

Patients with SCC who had undergone R0 resection were included. Propensity score matching was used to select matched groups. Survival and recurrence were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for overall and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1390 patients were included, of whom 1000 had surgery alone and 390 underwent S-CCRT. Propensity score matching yielded 213 well balanced pairs. The 3-year overall survival rate and median survival time in the S-CCRT group were 0·50 and 36·5 (95 per cent c.i. 25·1 to 52·6) months respectively, compared with 0·38 and 22·8 (18·2 to 29·0) months in the surgery-alone group (P = 0·006). The 3-year disease-free survival rate and median disease-free survival time in the S-CCRT group were 0·46 and 30·6 (22·2 to 39·3) months respectively, compared with 0·36 and 17·6 (11·3 to 23·9) months in the surgery-alone group (P = 0·006). The 2-year freedom from locoregional recurrence rate was 0·87 and 0·77 in the S-CCRT and surgery-alone groups respectively (P = 0·003). In multivariable analysis, independent prognostic factors for disease-free survival included age over 56 years, pT3-4 category, pN category, poor differentiation, tumour length exceeding 4·0 cm, and receiving postoperative chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio 0·62, 95 per cent c.i. 0·47 to 0·81; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSION

Oesophagectomy with postoperative chemoradiotherapy was associated with longer survival and lower recurrence rates, especially at a locoregional level, compared with surgery alone.

A Randomized Phase II Study of Leucovorin/5-Fluorouracil with or without Oxaliplatin (LV5FU2 vs. FOLFOX) for Curatively-Resected, Node-Positive Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Purpose

The optimal perioperative treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (LV5FU2) and LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination chemotherapies administered adjuvantly for curatively-resected, node-positive ESCC.

Materials and Methods

Patients with pathologically node-positive esophageal cancer after curative R0 resection were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive LV5FU2 or FOLFOX biweekly for up to eight cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

Between 2011 and 2015, 62 patients were randomized into the two treatment groups (32 in the LV5FU2 arm and 30 in the FOLFOX arm). The median age was 60 years and both groups had similar pathologic characteristics in tumor, nodal status, and location. Treatment completion rates were similarly high in both groups. The DFS rate at 12 months was 67% in the LV5FU2 group and 63% in the FOLFOX group with a hazard ratio of 1.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66 to 2.62). After a median follow-up period of 27 months, the median DFS was 29.6 months (95% CI, 4.9 to 54.2) in the LV5FU2 arm and 16.8 months (95% CI, 7.5 to 26.1) in the FOLFOX arm (p=0.428), respectively, while the median overall survival was not reached in either arm. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in patients in the FOLFOX arm than the LV5FU2 arm (20.0% vs. 3.1%).

Conclusion

The addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) did not lead to better efficacy compared to LV5FU2 chemotherapy in an adjuvant setting in node-positive ESCC patients.

Anatomic distribution of supraclavicular lymph node in patients with esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Definitive chemoradiation therapy remains the standard of care for patients with localized esophageal carcinoma who choose nonsurgical management. However, there is no consensus regarding delineation of the nodal clinical target volume (CTVn), especially for lower cervical lymph nodes. This study aimed to map the location of metastatic supraclavicular lymph nodes in thoracic esophageal carcinoma patients with supraclavicular node involvement and generate an atlas to delineate the CTVn for elective nodal radiation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, the supraclavicular regional lymph node was further divided into four subgroups. The locations of the involved supraclavicular nodes for all patients were then transferred onto a template computed tomography (CT) image. A volume probability map was then generated with nodal volumes, and was displayed on the template CT to provide a visual impression of nodal frequencies and anatomic distribution.

RESULTS

We identified 154 supraclavicular nodal metastases based on CT image in 96 patients. Of these, 29.2% were located in group I region, 59.7% in group II region, 10.4% in group III region, and 0.7% in group IV region.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of our study, we suggest that the appropriate radiation field of CTVn should include the group I and II regions and the CTVn exterior margin along the lateral side of the internal jugular vein may be suitable.

Postoperative radiation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and target volume delineation

Esophageal cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and patients who are treated with surgery alone, without neoadjuvant therapies, experience frequent relapses. Whether postoperative therapies could reduce the recurrence or improve overall survival is still controversial for these patients. The purpose of our review is to figure out the value of postoperative adjuvant therapy and address the disputes about target volume delineation according to published data. Based on the evidence of increased morbidity and disadvantages on patient survival caused by postoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy (RT) alone provided by studies in the early 1990s, the use of postoperative adjuvant therapies in cases of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has diminished substantially and has been replaced gradually by neoadjuvant chemoradiation. With advances in surgery and RT, accumulating evidence has recently rekindled interest in the delivery of postoperative RT or chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage T3/T4 or N1 (lymph node positive) carcinomas after radical surgery. However, due to complications with the standard radiation field, a nonconforming modified field has been adopted in most studies. Therefore, we analyze different field applications and provide suggestions on the optimization of the radiation field based on the major sites of relapse and the surgical non-clearance area. For upper and middle thoracic esophageal carcinomas, the bilateral supraclavicular and superior mediastinal areas remain common sites of recurrence and should be encompassed within the clinical target volume. In contrast, a consensus has yet to be reached regarding lower thoracic esophageal carcinomas; the “standard” clinical target volume is still recommended. Further studies of larger sample sizes should focus on different recurrence patterns, categorized by tumor locations, refined classifications, and differing molecular biology, to provide more information on the delineation of target volumes.

Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Survival in Patients After Resection for Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The number of lymph node metastases (LNMs) and the positive lymph node ratio (LNR) have been shown to be significant independent prognostic factors in predicting overall survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Our aim was to evaluate whether a novel prognostic indicator-the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS)-predicts survival in esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between 1988 and 2007 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database of 18 registries, and a Chinese patient cohort was subjected to validation. The prognostic efficacy of LNM, LNR, and LODDS was compared. Prognostic performance was measured using Harrell's C-index statistic, Schemper's proportion of explained variation, and the Akaike information criterion (AIC).

RESULTS

A total of 4,123 patients in the SEER database and 134 patients in the Chinese cohort met our criteria in this study. LODDS gave a better prognostic performance than either LNM or LNR in both the SEER database and the Chinese cohort. Multivariate analyses showed significant values for LNM, LNR, and LODDS as prognostic factors (p < 0.001). However, only LODDS was a significant prognostic factor regardless of the number of lymph nodes retrieved (p = 0.677). Furthermore, after stratification of patients with no nodes involved or all nodes involved, the values of LODDS still distinguished the heterogeneity efficiently.

CONCLUSIONS

LODDS predicts survival more accurately than either LNM or LNR in patients undergoing resection for esophageal cancer, especially for patients with an insufficient number of lymph nodes retrieved.

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy improves survival in patients with stage II-III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: An analysis of clinical outcomes

Background

We compared the efficacy of postoperative chemoradiation (POCRT) and surgery alone (SA) in patients with stage II–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods

We analyzed the records of 265 patients with stage II–III ESCC who had undergone transthoracic esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy; 105 patients received POCRT, while 160 had SA.

Results

The median disease‐free survival (DFS) of the whole cohort was 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.2–24.8), while the median overall survival (OS) was 29 months (95% CI 25.5–32.5). The median DFS of the SA group was 21 months (95% CI 17.9–24.0), while that of the POCRT group was 29 months (95% CI 18.8–31.2; P = 0.048). Consistently, patients in the POCRT group had significantly longer median OS than patients in the SA group (34 vs. 26 months, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that in patients with positive lymph nodes, pathological stage III, T3–4 stage, and poorly differentiated carcinoma, POCRT was apparently more effective than SA at improving OS and decreasing the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that lymph node involvement and treatment with POCRT were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Compared with SA, POCRT may be more effective in improving OS and decreasing the rates of local recurrence and distant metastasis, particularly in stage III or positive lymph node stage II–III ESCC patients.

Impact of Treatment Modalities on Survival of Patients With Locoregional Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma in Taiwan

The optimal treatment modality for locoregional esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) is still undetermined. This study investigated the treatment modalities affecting survival of patients with ESCC in Taiwan.Data on 6202 patients who underwent treatment for locoregional esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma during 2008 to 2012 in Taiwan were collected from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. Patients were stratified by clinical stage. The major treatment approaches included definitive chemoradiotherapy, preoperative chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy, esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy, and esophagectomy alone. The impact of different treatment modalities on overall survival was analyzed.The majority of patients had stage III disease (n = 4091; 65.96%), followed by stage II (n = 1582, 25.51%) and stage I cancer (n = 529, 8.53%). The 3-year overall survival rates were 60.65% for patients with stage I disease, 36.21% for those with stage II cancer, and 21.39% for patients with stage III carcinoma. Surgery alone was associated with significantly better overall survival than the other treatment modalities for patients with stage I disease (P = 0.029) and was associated with significantly worse overall survival for patients with stage III cancer (P < 0.001). There was no survival risk difference among the different treatment methods for patients with clinical stage II disease.Multimodality treatment is recommended for patients with stage II-III esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Patients with clinical stage I disease can be treated with esophagectomy without preoperative therapy.

The role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

The prognosis of patients with lymph node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who primarily receive radical esophagectomy remains poor. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively investigate the role of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel- or paclitaxel-based regimens in these patients. A total of 434 consecutive patients were included in this study who underwent radical esophagectomy and were pathologically confirmed to have lymph node-positive ESCC from January 2005 to December 2010 in our institution. Among these patients, 113 patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (Group SC), and 321 patients underwent surgery alone (Group S). Propensity score matching and multivariate analyses were used to compensate for differences in some baseline characteristics. After matching, Group SC had significantly longer median disease-free survival (DFS) than that in Group S (23.63 months vs. 16.70 months; p = 0.006); further subset analysis revealed that a benefit regarding DFS was only associated with patients with N1 stage and with tumor length <4.5 cm. The median overall survival (OS) was similar between the two groups (38.57 months for Group SC vs. 25.27 months for Group S; p = 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative chemotherapy, length of the tumor, T status, and N category were significantly independent predictive factors of tumor recurrence (p < 0.05). Our data suggested that adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel- or paclitaxel-based regimens could significantly improve DFS for patients with N1 stage and tumor length <4.5 cm ESCC and that it could potentially prolong OS for patients with lymph node-positive ESCC after surgery, compared with surgery alone. These results warrant further confirmation in prospective, randomized trials.