1
|
Wisniowski P, Putnam LR, Gallagher S, Rawal R, Houghton C, Lipham JC. Short term safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation vs minimally invasive fundoplication: an ACS-NSQIP analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1944-1949. [PMID: 38334778 PMCID: PMC10978616 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10672-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) is an FDA-approved anti-reflux procedure with comparable outcomes to fundoplication. However, most data regarding its use are limited to single or small multicenter studies which may limit the generalizability of its efficacy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing MSA vs fundoplication in a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS The 2017-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Registry was utilized to evaluate patients undergoing MSA or fundoplication. Patients requiring Collis gastroplasty, paraesophageal hernia repair, and emergency cases, were excluded. Patient outcomes included overall complication rates, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality. RESULTS A total of 7,882 patients underwent MSA (n = 597) or fundoplication (n = 7285). MSA patients were younger (51 vs 57, p < 0.001), and more often male (49.6 vs 34.3%, p < 0.001). While patients undergoing MSA experienced similar rates of reoperation (1.0 vs 2.0%, p = 0.095), they experienced fewer readmissions (2.2 vs 4.7%, p = 0.005), complications (0.6 vs 4.0%, p < 0.001), shorter mean (SD) hospital length of stay(days) (0.4 ± 4.3 vs 1.8 ± 4.6, p < 0.001) and operative time(min) (80.8 ± 36.1 vs 118.7 ± 63.7, p < 0.001). Mortality was similar between groups (0 vs 0.3%, p = 0.175). On multivariable analysis, MSA was independently associated with reduced postoperative complications (OR 0.23, CI 0.08 to 0.61, p = 0.002), readmissions (OR 0.53, CI 0.30 to 0.94, p = 0.02), operative time (RC - 36.56, CI - 41.62 to - 31.49. p < 0.001) and length of stay (RC - 1.22, CI - 1.61 to - 0.84 p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In this national database study, compared to fundoplication MSA was associated with reduced postoperative complications, fewer readmissions, and shorter operative time and hospital length of stay. While randomized trials are lacking between MSA and fundoplication, both institutional and national database studies continue to support the use of MSA as a safe anti-reflux operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Wisniowski
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Luke R Putnam
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Shea Gallagher
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Rushil Rawal
- California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, CA, USA
| | - Caitlin Houghton
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - John C Lipham
- Division of Upper GI and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nehra D, Clements CDM, Bezzaa SL, Tabbakh Y, Walsh CM. Patient-reported outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2024; 106:344-352. [PMID: 37609688 PMCID: PMC10981991 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a chronic progressive disease, associated with substantial clinical and economic burden. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are considered first-line treatment; however, there are concerns around the long-term impact of their usage. Surgical treatment with Nissen fundoplication can be considered but, because of the potential side effects, few patients undergo surgery and there remains a substantial therapeutic gap within the current treatment pathway. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) using the LINX® device is an alternative surgical approach. METHODS The objective of this study was to investigate patient-reported outcomes following laparoscopic MSA surgery using the LINX® device in a UK setting. A retrospective questionnaire obtained data regarding postoperative symptoms, medication use and patient satisfaction. RESULTS Out of 131 patients surveyed, 97 responses were received, with a minimum follow-up time of 1 year. In those who reported heartburn and regurgitation preoperatively, improvement was reported in 93% (84/90) and 90% (86/96) of patients, respectively. Eighty-eight per cent (73/83) of patients were able to completely stop or reduce their medication by at least 75%. Seventy-seven per cent (73/95) of patients were "very satisfied" or "satisfied". CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to present patient-reported outcomes of MSA using the LINX® device for patients with GORD in the UK. It demonstrates that the device has favourable outcomes and could effectively bridge the current therapeutic gap that exists between PPI medication and Nissen fundoplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Nehra
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - CDM Clements
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - SL Bezzaa
- Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shacker M, Latorre-Rodríguez AR, Mittal SK. Prevalence and severity of abdominal bloating in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus 2024; 37:doad058. [PMID: 37738150 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023]
Abstract
Abdominal bloating (AB) is a common symptom among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, in clinical practice, its prevalence is likely underestimated due to the lack of objective tools to measure its frequency and severity. It is associated with dissatisfaction and worse quality of life, but data on its prevalence before and after mechanical control of GERD (i.e. fundoplication, magnetic sphincter augmentation, and antireflux mucosectomy) are lacking. To assess and determine the pre- and postoperative prevalence and severity of AB among patients with GERD, we conducted a structured literature search using MeSH and free-text terms in MEDLINE (via Pubmed), EMBASE, and Taylor & Francis Online between January 1977 and October 2022. Fifteen articles reporting the prevalence or severity of AB using quality-of-life questionnaires before or after antireflux surgery (ARS) were included. Overall, a high prevalence of AB before ARS was found. A decline in the prevalence and severity of AB was documented postoperatively in most cases independent of the surgical approach. Among surgical approaches, a complete fundoplication had the highest reported postoperative AB. Overall, patients reported less severe and less frequent AB after ARS than before. The traditional belief that postoperative bloating is a sequela of ARS should be reevaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Shacker
- School of Medicine, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Sumeet K Mittal
- School of Medicine, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Norton Thoracic Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Puri A, Steven S, Markar SR, Boyle N. Longer-term outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation. Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doad014. [PMID: 36942526 PMCID: PMC10789235 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Surgical intervention for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has historically been limited to fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a less invasive alternative that was introduced 15 years ago, and it may have a superior side-effect profile. To date, however, there has been just a single published study reporting outcomes in a UK population. This study reports quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes and antacid use in patients undergoing MSA, with a particular focus on postoperative symptoms and those with severe reflux. A single-center cohort study was carried out to assess the QOL outcomes and report long-term safety outcomes in patients undergoing MSA. GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) scores were collected preoperatively, and immediately postoperatively, at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year follow-up time points. All patients underwent preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy, impedance, and manometry. Two hundred and two patients underwent laparoscopic MSA over 9 years. The median preoperative GERD-HRQL score was 31, and the median RSI score was 17. There was a reduction in all scores from preoperative values to each time point, which was sustained at 5-year follow-up; 13% of patients had a preoperative DeMeester score of >50, and their median preoperative GERD-HRQL and RSI scores were 32 and 15.5, respectively. These were reduced to 0 at the most recent follow-up. There was a significant reduction in antacid use at all postoperative time points. Postoperative dilatation was necessary in 7.4% of patients, and the device was removed in 1.4%. Erosion occurred in no patients. MSA is safe and effective at reducing symptom burden and improving QOL scores in patients with both esophageal and laryngopharyngeal symptoms, including those with severe reflux.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aiysha Puri
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sue Steven
- Department of Surgery, Reflux UK, London, UK
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Nuffield Department of Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schoppmann SF. Is magnetic sphincter augmentation indicated in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux? Dis Esophagus 2023; 36:doad012. [PMID: 37317930 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doad012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Up to 30% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) suffer from laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) with symptoms, as chronic cough, laryngitis, or asthma. Besides life-style modifications and medical acid suppression, laparoscopic fundoplication is an established treatment option. Treatment-related side effects after laparoscopic fundoplication have to be weighted against LPR symptom control in 30-85% of patients after surgery. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is described as an effective alternative to fundoplication for surgical treatment of GERD. However, evidence on the efficacy of MSA in patients with LPR is very limited. Preliminary data on the results of MSA treating LPR symptoms in patients with acid and weakly acid reflux are promising; showing comparable results to laparoscopic fundoplication by providing the potential of decrease side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian F Schoppmann
- Upper-GI Service, Department of Visceral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Slater BJ, Collings A, Dirks R, Gould JC, Qureshi AP, Juza R, Rodríguez-Luna MR, Wunker C, Kohn GP, Kothari S, Carslon E, Worrell S, Abou-Setta AM, Ansari MT, Athanasiadis DI, Daly S, Dimou F, Haskins IN, Hong J, Krishnan K, Lidor A, Litle V, Low D, Petrick A, Soriano IS, Thosani N, Tyberg A, Velanovich V, Vilallonga R, Marks JM. Multi-society consensus conference and guideline on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Surg Endosc 2023; 37:781-806. [PMID: 36529851 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09817-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases in North America and globally. The aim of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the most utilized and available endoscopic and surgical treatments for GERD. METHODS Systematic literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical and endoscopic treatments for GERD in adults: preoperative evaluation, endoscopic vs surgical or medical treatment, complete vs partial fundoplication, and treatment for obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m2) and concomitant GERD. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed. RESULTS The consensus provided 13 recommendations. Through the development of these evidence-based recommendations, an algorithm was proposed for aid in the treatment of GERD. Patients with typical symptoms should undergo upper endoscopy, manometry, and pH-testing; additional testing may be required for patients with atypical or extra-esophageal symptoms. Patients with normal or abnormal findings on manometry should consider undergoing partial fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication are appropriate surgical procedures for adults with GERD. For patients who wish to avoid surgery, the Stretta procedure and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF 2.0) were found to have better outcomes than proton pump inhibitors alone. Patients with concomitant obesity were recommended to undergo either gastric bypass or fundoplication, although patients with severe comorbid disease or BMI > 50 should undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the additional benefits that follow weight loss. CONCLUSION Using the recommendations an algorithm was developed by this panel, so that physicians may better counsel their patients with GERD. There are certain patient factors that have been excluded from included studies/trials, and so these recommendations should not replace surgeon-patient decision making. Engaging in the identified research areas may improve future care for GERD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethany J Slater
- University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4062, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Amelia Collings
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Rebecca Dirks
- Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Jon C Gould
- Division of Minimally Invasive and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Alia P Qureshi
- Division of General & GI Surgery, Foregut Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Ryan Juza
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - María Rita Rodríguez-Luna
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD) and ICube Laboratory, Photonics Instrumentation for Health, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Geoffrey P Kohn
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shanu Kothari
- Department of Surgery, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | | | - Ahmed M Abou-Setta
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Mohammed T Ansari
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Shaun Daly
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA
| | | | - Ivy N Haskins
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA
| | - Julie Hong
- Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian/Queens, Queens, USA
| | | | - Anne Lidor
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Virginia Litle
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Donald Low
- Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anthony Petrick
- Department of General Surgery, Geisinger School of Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
| | - Ian S Soriano
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nirav Thosani
- McGovern Medical School, Center for Interventional Gastroenterology at UTHealth, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amy Tyberg
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Vic Velanovich
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tampa General, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ramon Vilallonga
- Endocrine, Metabolic and Bariatric Unit, General Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Center of Excellence for the EAC-BC, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jeffrey M Marks
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Froiio C, Tareq A, Riggio V, Siboni S, Bonavina L. Real-world evidence with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a scoping review. Eur Surg 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-022-00789-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Summary
Background
The burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is high, with up to 30% of the Western population reporting reflux-related symptoms with or without hiatal hernia. Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a standardized laparoscopic procedure for patients who are dissatisfied with medical therapy and for those with early-stage disease who would not usually be considered ideal candidates for fundoplication. The MSA device is manufactured in different sizes and is designed to augment the physiologic barrier to reflux by magnetic force.
Methods
An extensive scoping review was performed to provide a map of current evidence with respect to MSA, to identify gaps in knowledge, and to make recommendations for future research. All the authors contributed to the literature search in PubMed and Web of Science and contributed to summarizing the evidence.
Results
Magnetic sphincter augmentation, especially in combination with crural repair, is effective in reducing GERD symptoms, proton pump inhibitor use, and esophageal acid exposure, and in improving patients’ quality of life. Safety issues such as device erosion or migration have been rare and not associated with mortality. The MSA device can be removed laparoscopically if necessary, thereby preserving the option of fundoplication or other therapies in the future. Contraindication to scanning in high-power Tesla magnetic resonance systems remains a potential limitation of the MSA procedure. High-resolution manometry and functional lumen imaging probes appear to be promising tools to predict procedural outcomes by improving reflux control and reducing the incidence of dysphagia.
Conclusion
A consensus on acquisition and interpretation of high-resolution manometry and impedance planimetry data is needed to gain better understanding of physiology, to improve patient selection, and to pave the way for a personalized surgical approach in antireflux surgery.
Collapse
|
8
|
Sarici IS, Dunn CP, Eriksson SE, Jobe BA, Ayazi S. Long-term clinical and functional results of magnetic sphincter augmentation. Dis Esophagus 2022:6965898. [PMID: 36585776 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) was introduced in 2007 as an alternative surgical procedure for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The majority of data since MSA's introduction has focused on short and intermediate-term results, demonstrating safety and high efficacy in terms of reflux symptom control, freedom from proton pump inhibitor use and normalization of distal esophageal acid exposure. However, GERD is a chronic condition that demands a long-term solution. Limited available data from studies reporting outcomes at 5 years or later following MSA demonstrate that the promising short- and mid-term efficacy and safety profile of MSA remains relatively constant in the long term. Compared with Nissen fundoplication, MSA has a much lower rate of gas-bloat and inability to belch at a short-term follow-up, a difference that persists in the long-term. The most common complaint after MSA at a short-term follow-up is dysphagia. However, limited data suggest dysphagia rates largely decrease by 5 years. Dysphagia is the most common indication for dilation and device removal in both early- and long-term studies. However, the overall rates of dilation and removal are similar in short- and long-term reports, suggesting the majority of these procedures are performed in the short-term period after device implantation. The indications and standard practices of MSA have evolved over time. Long-term outcome data currently available are all from patient cohorts who were selected for MSA under early restricted indications and outdated regimens. Therefore, further long-term studies are needed to corroborate the preliminary, yet encouraging long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inanc S Sarici
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Colin P Dunn
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Sven E Eriksson
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Blair A Jobe
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shahin Ayazi
- Esophageal Institute, Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Surgery, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Callahan ZM, Amundson J, Su B, Kuchta K, Ujiki M. Outcomes after anti-reflux procedures: Nissen, Toupet, magnetic sphincter augmentation or anti-reflux mucosectomy? Surg Endosc 2022; 37:3944-3951. [PMID: 35999311 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09544-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical treatment options of gastroesophageal reflux disease have changed significantly in the last 50 years. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) and Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMs) are gaining traction but there is a paucity of literature comparing these novel options to Toupet fundoplication and gold standard Nissen fundoplication. METHODS This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database, evaluating patients undergoing Nissen, Toupet, MSA, and ARMs. Pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative variables including Reflux symptom index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life questionnaire (GERD-HRQL), and Dysphagia scores were compared between groups. RESULTS During the study period, 649 patients underwent anti-reflux surgery. Patients who underwent Nissen or Toupet were younger than those undergoing MSA or ARMs (65 ± 12 and 67 ± 14 years vs 56 ± 14 and 56 ± 18 years, P < 0.01). Average operative time for Nissen was 127 ± 40 min which was similar to a Toupet at 122 ± 32 min. These durations were significantly longer than for MSA, averaging 79 ± 29, and ARMs, at a mean 35 ± 3 min (all P < 0.001). Length of stay was significantly different among all four groups with Nissen, Toupet, MSA, and ARMs patients staying a median of 31, 24, 7, and 3 h post operatively, respectively (all P < 0.001). Complications and re-admissions were similarly low among all groups. Despite minor differences in RSI and GERD-HRQL scores at isolated follow-up time points, quality of life scores seems to be similar overall at up to 5 years follow-up. Gas bloat and dysphagia did not differ among groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS Novel anti-reflux surgery options provide similar GERD-related quality of life compared to traditional full or partial fundoplications with the added benefit of shorter operative time and faster recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary M Callahan
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA.
| | - Julia Amundson
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Bailey Su
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Kristine Kuchta
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Michael Ujiki
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nikolic M, Matic A, Feka J, Gensthaler L, Kristo I, Osmokrovic B, Riegler FM, Mosleh BO, Schoppmann SF. Expanded Indication for Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation: Outcomes in Weakly Acidic Reflux Compared to Standard GERD Patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:532-541. [PMID: 34590216 PMCID: PMC8926968 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-021-05152-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a modern surgical anti-reflux technique with proven efficacy and low postoperative morbidity in patients with acidic reflux. The aim of this retrospective review study was to evaluate the symptomatic outcome of MSA in patients with weakly acidic reflux. METHODS From a prospectively collected clinical database, comprising all 327 patients that underwent MSA at our institution, a total of 67 patients with preoperative weakly acidic reflux measured in the 24-h impedance-pH-metry were identified. Postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, proton pump inhibitor intake (PPI), GERD Health-Related Quality-of-Life (GERD-HRQL), alimentary satisfaction (AS), and patients' overall satisfaction were evaluated within highly standardized follow-up appointments. Furthermore, outcome of these patients was compared to the postoperative outcome of a comparable group of patients with a preoperative acidic reflux. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 24 months, none of the patients with weakly acidic reflux presented with persistent dysphagia, or underwent endoscopic dilatation or reoperation. The postoperative GERD-HRQL score was significantly reduced (2 vs. 20; p = 0.001) and the median AS was 9/10. Preoperative daily heartburn, regurgitations, and respiratory complaints were improved in 95%, 95%, and 96% of patients, respectively. A total of 10% of the patients continued to use PPIs postoperatively. No significant difference was observed in terms of postoperative outcome or quality of life when comparing weakly acidic reflux patients with those diagnosed with preoperative acidic reflux. CONCLUSION Magnetic sphincter augmentation significantly improves GERD-related symptoms and quality of life in patients with weakly acidic reflux with very low postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Nikolic
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aleksa Matic
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joy Feka
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lisa Gensthaler
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ivan Kristo
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bogdan Osmokrovic
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Krankenhaus Oberwart, Dornburggasse 80, 7400, Oberwart, Austria
| | - Franz M Riegler
- Reflux Ordination, Mariannengasse 10/4/9, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Berta O Mosleh
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sebastian F Schoppmann
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wu H, Attaar M, Wong HJ, Campbell M, Kuchta K, Ungerleider S, Denham W, Linn J, Ujiki MB. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements persist long term after anti-reflux surgery. Surgery 2021; 171:628-634. [PMID: 34865861 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The functional lumen imaging probe provides objective measurements of the gastroesophageal junction during laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. There is a lack of data on how functional lumen imaging probe measurements change at follow-up. We aim to describe our institutional experience in performing functional lumen imaging probe during postoperative endoscopy after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery. METHODS A prospectively maintained database was queried. Patients who had postoperative endoscopic functional lumen imaging probe measurements between March 2018 and June 2021 were assessed at different time points from their index laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery using paired t test. Standardized quality of life questionnaires were collected for up to 2 years. Group comparisons were made using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS Fifty-eight patients who underwent laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery (magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication) had postoperative functional lumen imaging probe. Thirty-two intraoperative functional lumen imaging probe values were compared with their postoperative functional lumen imaging probe. Fundoplication values did not differ. Postoperative functional lumen imaging probe distensibility index for magnetic sphincter augmentation patients was decreased (P = .04). Functional lumen imaging probe measurements for all postoperative endoscopies showed that magnetic sphincter augmentation had the lowest distensibility index (P < .01). Dysphagia as a reason for endoscopy had a decrease in distensibility index (P = .03). CONCLUSION Functional lumen imaging probe measurements after fundoplication persist at long-term follow up while patients may have a tighter gastroesophageal junction after magnetic sphincter augmentation. Functional lumen imaging probe has the potential to assess the success or failure after laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery and optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoover Wu
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
| | - Mikhail Attaar
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Harry J Wong
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Michelle Campbell
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Woody Denham
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | - John Linn
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| | - Michael B Ujiki
- Department of Surgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhuang QJ, Tan ND, Chen SF, Zhang MY, Xiao YL. Magnetic sphincter augmentation in treating refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2021; 22:695-705. [PMID: 34693633 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.13063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in the management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (rGERD). METHODS Literature search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, OpenGrey and ClincalTrials.gov for single-arm studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of MSA in rGERD or comparative studies with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) serving as the control published until April 2020. Primary outcome was the rate of postoperative PPI use, and secondary outcomes included postoperative GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL), normalization of acid exposure time (AET) and incidence of procedure-related adverse events (AE). RESULTS Ten single-arm studies, one randomized controlled trial and three cohort studies involving 1138 participants were included. Post-MSA PPI withdrawal, significant GERD-HRQL improvement and AET normalization were achieved in 87.0%, 88.0% and 75.0% of the patients, respectively. The incidence of postoperative dysphagia was 29% and endoscopic dilation was required in 7.4% of patients undergoing MSA. MSA showed a better efficacy in symptom control than PPI (PPI cessation: 91% vs 0%; GERD-HRQL improvement: 81% vs 8%) and similar effectiveness but a lower risk of gas-bloat syndrome (risk ratio [RR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.93, P = 0.01) and better reserved ability to belch (RR 1.48, 95% CI 0.76-2.86, P = 0.25) compared with LNF. CONCLUSIONS MSA was an effective and safe therapy for rGERD. Well-designed randomized trials that compare the efficacy of MSA with other therapies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Jun Zhuang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Nian Di Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Song Feng Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Meng Yu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ying Lian Xiao
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Friedman AJ, Elseth AJ, Brockmeyer JR. Proton Pump Inhibitors, Associated Complications, and Alternative Therapies: A Shifting Risk Benefit Ratio. Am Surg 2021; 88:20-27. [PMID: 33560890 DOI: 10.1177/0003134821991988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our goal was to compile the most recent and accurate data on the side effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPI). We also compared the efficacy of PPI to the efficacy of different surgical options for acid reflux control. BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors are the primary therapy for chronic control of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but newer studies demonstrate deleterious side effects. Collating this information and contrasting it with surgical therapy for GERD provides evidence for possible practice changes in treatment. METHODS A literature search utilizing PubMed was performed evaluating for PPI and anti-reflux surgery (ARS), focusing on articles that reflected information regarding the usage and efficacy of symptom control of both PPI and ARS. Search terms included "ARS, fundoplication, MSA, acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, meta-analysis, PPI, H2 blocker, cardiovascular risk, and gut dysbiosis." We evaluated 271 articles by title, abstract, and data for relevance and included 70. RESULTS Long-term control of GERD with PPI may have a greater than expected side effect profile than initially thought. Surgical options may provide greater symptom control than PPI without the side effects of long-term medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS Anti-reflux control can be safely achieved with either PPI or surgical options; however, the long-term side effects noted in the review such as increased risk of cardiovascular events, renal disease, and gut dysbiosis may suggest surgical anti-reflux control as a better long-term option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Friedman
- General Surgery Department, 19911Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA, USA
| | - Anna J Elseth
- General Surgery Department, 19911Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA, USA
| | - Joel R Brockmeyer
- General Surgery Department, 19911Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schwameis K, Ayazi S, Zheng P, Grubic AD, Salvitti M, Hoppo T, Jobe BA. Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Across the Spectrum of GERD Disease Severity. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 232:288-297. [PMID: 33387623 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The performance and durability of various types of fundoplication are variable when stratified by disease severity. To date, magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has not been evaluated in this context. We designed this study to determine the efficacy of MSA in the treatment of severe GERD. STUDY DESIGN Guided by previous studies, a DeMeester score (DMS) ≥ 50 was used as a cutoff point to define severe reflux disease. Subjects were divided into 2 groups using this cutoff, and outcomes of severe cases were compared with those with less severe disease (DMS < 50). RESULTS A total of 334 patients underwent MSA. Patients with severe disease had a higher mean preoperative DMS compared with those with mild to moderate GERD (79.2 [53.2] vs 22.8 [13.7], p < 0.0001). At a mean postoperative follow-up of 13.6 (10.4) months, there was no difference between the mean GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) total scores in patients with severe disease compared with those with less severe GERD (8.8 [10] vs 9.2 [10.8], p = 0.9204). Postoperative mean DMS was not different between groups (17.3[23.0] vs 14.1[33.9], p = 0.71), and there was no difference in the prevalence of esophagitis (p = 0.52). Patients with severe disease were less likely to be free from use of proton pump inhibitors after surgery (85% vs 93.1%, p = 0.041). There were similar rates of postoperative dysphagia (10% vs 14%, p = 0.42) and need for device removal (3% vs 5%, p = 0.7463). CONCLUSIONS MSA is an effective treatment in patients with severe GERD and leads to significant clinical improvement across the spectrum of disease severity, with few objective outcomes being superior in patients with mild-to-moderate reflux disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shahin Ayazi
- Esophageal Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA.
| | - Ping Zheng
- Esophageal Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Andrew D Grubic
- Esophageal Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Toshitaka Hoppo
- Esophageal Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Blair A Jobe
- Esophageal Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huynh P, Konda V, Sanguansataya S, Ward MA, Leeds SG. Mind the Gap: Current Treatment Alternatives for GERD Patients Failing Medical Treatment and Not Ready for a Fundoplication. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 31:264-276. [PMID: 33347088 PMCID: PMC8154178 DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with Barrett esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and significantly impacts quality of life. Medical management is the first line therapy with surgical fundoplication as an alternative therapy. However, a small portion of patients who fail medical therapy are referred for surgical consultation. This creates a "gap" in therapy for those patients dissatisfied with medical therapy but are not getting referred for surgical consultation. Three procedures have been designed to address these patients. These include radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lower esophageal sphincter, transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and magnetic sphincter augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A Pubmed literature review was conducted of all publications for RFA, TIF, and MSA. Four most common endpoints for the 3 procedures were compared at different intervals of follow-up. These include percent of patients off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), GERD-HRQL score, DeMeester score, and percent of time with pH <4. A second query was performed for patients treated with PPI and fundoplications to match the same 4 endpoints as a control. RESULTS Variable freedom from PPI was reported at 1 year for RFA with a weighted mean of 62%, TIF with a weighted mean of 61%, MSA with a weighted mean of 85%, and fundoplications with a weighted mean of 84%. All procedures including PPIs improved quality-of-life scores but were not equal. Fundoplication had the best improvement followed by MSA, TIF, RFA, and PPI, respectively. DeMeester scores are variable after all procedures and PPIs. All MSA studies showed normalization of pH, whereas only 4 of 17 RFA studies and 3 of 11 TIF studies reported normalization of pH. CONCLUSIONS Our literature review compares 3 rival procedures to treat "gap" patients for gastroesophageal reflux disease with 4 common endpoints. Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to have the most reproducible and linear outcomes but is the most invasive of the 3 procedures. MSA outcomes most closely mirrors that of fundoplication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phuong Huynh
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health
| | - Vani Konda
- Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas
| | | | - Marc A. Ward
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health
- Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX
| | - Steven G. Leeds
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center
- Center for Advanced Surgery, Baylor Scott & White Health
- Texas A&M College of Medicine, Bryan, TX
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
More beads, more peristaltic reserve, better outcomes: factors predicting postoperative dysphagia after magnetic sphincter augmentation. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5295-5302. [PMID: 33128078 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08013-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) offers a minimally invasive anti-reflux alternative to fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. The most common side effect of MSA is dysphagia, which may require dilation or even device removal. The incidence of dysphagia may be reduced by MSA sizing and preoperative motility studies. Multiple rapid swallows (MRS) is a provocative maneuver during high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) that assesses peristaltic reserve. We evaluated factors predicting development of dysphagia following MSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified patients undergoing MSA. Preoperative work-up included barium swallow, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and esophageal manometry. Peristaltic augmentation was defined as a ratio > 1 of the distal contractile integral (DCI) following MRS and the mean DCI of the 10 baseline wet swallows during manometry. Demographics, MSA implant size, and postoperative symptom data were gathered on all patients. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients underwent MSA. Mean age was 51.7 years, average BMI was 25.8 kg/m2. 15 (22.1%) of patients had severe dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilation. Peristaltic augmentation with MRS was significantly higher in patients without dysphagia (46.1% vs 6.3% p = 0.026). 33.3% of patients requiring dilatation exhibited complete absence of smooth muscle contraction following MRS (DCI = 0). The ratio of the DCI of MRS/wet swallows predicting dysphagia following MSA was 0.56. Patients with a small (12-14 beads) versus a larger MSA implant (15-17 beads) had a significantly higher rate of postoperative dysphagia (58.5% vs 30.0% p = 0.026). CONCLUSION Adequate peristaltic reserve and larger device size correlate with decreased incidence of dysphagia following MSA implantation without compromising the anti-reflux barrier. Routine assessment of peristaltic reserve during preoperative HRM should be considered prior to MSA placement.
Collapse
|
17
|
Regression of Barrett’s esophagus after magnetic sphincter augmentation: intermediate-term results. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:5804-5809. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08074-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
18
|
Vaezi MF, Shaheen NJ, Muthusamy VR. State of Evidence in Minimally Invasive Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux: Findings of a Scoping Review. Gastroenterology 2020; 159:1504-1525. [PMID: 32621903 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS & AIMS Endoscopic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is being employed increasingly. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the volume of available evidence on the benefits of endoscopic and minimally invasive surgical therapies for GERD. METHODS criteria were used to perform an extensive literature search of data regarding the reported benefit of endoscopic therapies in GERD. Randomized controlled studies were utilized when available; however, data from observational studies were also reviewed. RESULTS A formal review of evidence was performed in 22 studies. Inclusion and exclusion criteria and study duration were noted and tabulated. Assessment of outcomes was based on symptoms and objective criteria reported by investigators. Reported outcomes for the interventions were tabulated under the heading of subjective (symptom scores, quality of life metrics, and change in proton pump inhibitor use) and objective metrics (pH parameters, endoscopic signs, and lower esophageal sphincter pressure changes). Adverse events were noted and tabulated. The majority of studies showed symptomatic and objective improvement of GERD with the device therapies. Adverse events were minimal. However, normalization of acid exposure occurred in about 50% of patients and, for some modalities, long-term durability is uncertain. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review revealed that the endoluminal and minimally invasive surgical devices for GERD therapy are a promising alternative to proton pump inhibitor therapy. Their place in the treatment algorithm for GERD will be better defined when important clinical parameters, especially durability of effect, are better understood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Safety and efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation dilation. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3861-3864. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07799-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
20
|
Bell R, Lipham J, Louie BE, Williams V, Luketich J, Hill M, Richards W, Dunst C, Lister D, McDowell-Jacobs L, Reardon P, Woods K, Gould J, Buckley FP, Kothari S, Khaitan L, Smith CD, Park A, Smith C, Jacobsen G, Abbas G, Katz P. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Superior to Proton Pump Inhibitors for Regurgitation in a 1-Year Randomized Trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:1736-1743.e2. [PMID: 31518717 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Regurgitative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractive to medical treatment is common and caused by mechanical failure of the anti-reflux barrier. We compared the effects of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with those of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a randomized trial. METHODS Patients with moderate to severe regurgitation (assessed by the foregut symptom questionnaire) despite once-daily PPI therapy (n = 152) were randomly assigned to groups given twice-daily PPIs (n = 102) or laparoscopic MSA (n = 50) at 20 sites, from July 2015 through February 2017. Patients answered questions from the foregut-specific reflux disease questionnaire and GERD health-related quality of life survey about regurgitation, heartburn, dysphagia, bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, and medication use, at baseline and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Six months after PPI therapy, MSA was offered to patients with persistent moderate to severe regurgitation and excess reflux episodes during impedance or pH testing on medication. Regurgitation, foregut scores, esophageal acid exposure, and adverse events were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS Patients in the MSA group and those who crossed over to the MSA group after PPI therapy (n = 75) had similar outcomes. MSA resulted in control of regurgitation in 72/75 patients (96%); regurgitation control was independent of preoperative response to PPIs. Only 8/43 patients receiving PPIs (19%) reported control of regurgitation. Among the 75 patients who received MSA, 61 (81%) had improvements in GERD health-related quality of life improvement scores (greater than 50%) and 68 patients (91%) discontinued daily PPI use. Proportions of patients with dysphagia decreased from 15% to 7% (P < .005), bloating decreased from 55% to 25%, and esophageal acid exposure time decreased from 10.7% to 1.3% (P < .001) from study entry to 1-year after MSA (Combined P < .001). Seventy percent (48/69) of patients had pH normalization at study completion. MSA was not associated with any peri-operative events, device explants, erosions, or migrations. CONCLUSIONS In a prospective study, we found MSA to reduce regurgitation in 95% of patients with moderate to severe regurgitation despite once-daily PPI therapy. MSA is superior to twice-daily PPIs therapy in reducing regurgitation. Relief of regurgitation is sustained over 12 months. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02505945.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reginald Bell
- Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery, Englewood, Colorado.
| | - John Lipham
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brian E Louie
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Valerie Williams
- Thoracic Surgery Department, St. Elizabeth's Healthcare, Edgewood, Kentucky
| | - James Luketich
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Hill
- Department of Surgery, Adirondack Medical Center and Adirondack Surgical Group, Saranac Lake, New York
| | - William Richards
- Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama
| | - Christy Dunst
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Clinic, Portland, Oregon
| | - Dan Lister
- Arkansas Heartburn Treatment Center, Baptist Health Medical Center, Heber Springs, Arkansas
| | | | - Patrick Reardon
- Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Karen Woods
- Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Jon Gould
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - F Paul Buckley
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
| | - Shanu Kothari
- Department of Surgery, Prisma Health, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Leena Khaitan
- Department of Surgery, Digestive Health Institute, University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | - Adrian Park
- Department of Surgery, Anne Arundel Health System and Johns Hopkins Medicine, Annapolis, Maryland
| | | | - Garth Jacobsen
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Ghulam Abbas
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Philip Katz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tsai C, Steffen R, Kessler U, Merki H, Lipham J, Zehetner J. Postoperative Dysphagia Following Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 30:322-326. [DOI: 10.1097/sle.0000000000000785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
22
|
Dunn C, Bildzukewicz N, Lipham J. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020; 30:325-342. [PMID: 32146949 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2019.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter augmentation is an effective and safe surgical method for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The device has been compared with twice-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy and laparoscopic fundoplication (in randomized trials and prospective cohort studies, respectively). Magnetic sphincter augmentation was superior to medical therapy and equivalent to surgery for the relief of GERD symptoms. Recent research focuses on implanting the device into more complex patients, such as those with larger hiatal hernias or those with Barrett's esophagus. Additional novel research topics include cost analysis and predicting and minimizing postoperative dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Dunn
- General Surgery Rutgers NJMS, 185 South Orange Avenue, Medical Science Building, Room G 594, Newark, NJ 07101, USA
| | - Nikolai Bildzukewicz
- The Advanced GI/MIS Fellowship, Keck Medical Center of USC, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA 90033-4612, USA
| | - John Lipham
- Upper GI Cancer, Keck Medical Center of USC, 1510 San Pablo Street, HCC I, Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA 90033-4612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Schizas D, Mastoraki A, Papoutsi E, Giannakoulis VG, Kanavidis P, Tsilimigras D, Ntourakis D, Lyros O, Liakakos T, Moris D. LINX ® reflux management system to bridge the “treatment gap” in gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review of 35 studies. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:294-305. [PMID: 32047777 PMCID: PMC7000944 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i2.294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) occurs when the reflux of stomach contents causes troublesome symptoms and/or complications. When medical therapy is insufficient, surgical therapy is indicated and, until now, Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) constitutes the gold-standard method. However, magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) using the LINX® Reflux Management System has recently emerged and disputes the standard therapeutic approach.
AIM To investigate the device’s safety and efficacy in resolving GERD symptoms.
METHODS This is a systematic review conducted in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL databases from inception until September 2019.
RESULTS Overall, 35 studies with a total number of 2511 MSA patients were included and analyzed. Post-operative proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) cessation rates reached 100%, with less bloating symptoms and a better ability to belch or vomit in comparison to LF. Special patient groups (e.g., bariatric or large hiatal-hernias) had promising results too. The most common postoperative complication was dysphagia ranging between 6% and 83%. Dilation due to dysphagia occurred in 8% of patients with typical inclusion criteria. Esophageal erosion may occur in up to 0.03% of patients. Furthermore, a recent trial indicated MSA as an efficient alternative to double-dose PPIs in moderate-to-severe GERD.
CONCLUSION The findings of our review suggest that MSA has the potential to bridge the treatment gap between maxed-out medical treatment and LF. However, further studies with longer follow-up are needed for a better elucidation of these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Schizas
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Mastoraki
- 4th Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Chaidari, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Eleni Papoutsi
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Vassilis G Giannakoulis
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Prodromos Kanavidis
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Diamantis Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH 45830, United States
| | - Dimitrios Ntourakis
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia 2404, Cyprus
| | - Orestis Lyros
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig 04103, Germany
| | - Theodore Liakakos
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon Hospital, Athens 11527, Greece
| | - Dimitrios Moris
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27705, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Objective Evidence of Reflux Control After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation: One Year Results From a Post Approval Study. Ann Surg 2020; 270:302-308. [PMID: 29697454 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report 1-year results from a 5-year mandated study. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA In 2012, the United States Food and Drug Administration approved magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with the LINX Reflux Management System (Torax Medical, Shoreview, MN), a novel device for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Continued assessment of safety and effectiveness has been monitored in a Post Approval Study. METHODS Multicenter, prospective study of patients with pathologic acid reflux confirmed by esophageal pH testing undergoing MSA. Predefined clinical outcomes were assessed at the annual visit including a validated, disease-specific questionnaire, esophagogastricduodenoscopy and esophageal pH monitoring, and use of proton pump inhibitors. RESULTS A total of 200 patients (102 males, 98 females) with a mean age of 48.5 years (range 19.7-71.6) were treated with MSA between March 2013 and August 2015. At 1 year, the mean total acid exposure time decreased from 10.0% at baseline to 3.6%, and 74.4% of patients had normal esophageal acid exposure time (% time pH<4 ≤5.3%). GERD Health-Related Quality of Life scores improved from a median score of 26.0 at baseline to 4.0 at 1 year, with 84% of patients meeting the predefined success criteria of at least a 50% reduction in total GERD Health-Related Quality of Life score compared with baseline. The device removal rate at 1 year was 2.5%. One erosion and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS Safety and effectiveness of magnetic sphincter augmentation has been demonstrated outside of an investigational setting to further confirm MSA as treatment for GERD.
Collapse
|
25
|
Kirkham EN, Main BG, Jones KJB, Blazeby JM, Blencowe NS. Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2019; 107:44-55. [PMID: 31800095 PMCID: PMC6972716 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is reported to be an innovative alternative to antireflux surgery for patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Although used in practice, little is known about how it has been evaluated. This study aimed to systematically summarize and appraise the reporting of MSA and its introduction into clinical practice, in the context of guidelines (such as IDEAL) for evaluating innovative surgical devices. METHODS Systematic searches were used to identify all published studies reporting MSA insertion. Data collected included patient selection, governance arrangements, surgeon expertise, technique description and outcome reporting. RESULTS Searches identified 587 abstracts; 39 full-text papers were included (1 RCT 5 cohort, 3 case-control, 25 case series, 5 case reports). Twenty-one followed US Food and Drug Administration eligibility criteria for MSA insertion. Twenty-six documented that ethical approval was obtained. Two reported that participating surgeons received training in MSA; 18 provided information about how MSA insertion was performed, although techniques varied between studies. Follow-up ranged from 4 weeks to 5 years; in 14 studies, it was less than 1 year. CONCLUSION Most studies on MSA lacked information about patient selection, governance, expertise, techniques and outcomes, or varied between studies. Currently, MSA is being used despite a lack of robust evidence for its effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E N Kirkham
- Conformité Européenne Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, UK.,Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - B G Main
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.,Conformité Européenne University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - K J B Jones
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - J M Blazeby
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.,Conformité Européenne University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - N S Blencowe
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Bristol, UK.,Conformité Européenne University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Guidozzi N, Wiggins T, Ahmed AR, Hanna GB, Markar SR. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and pooled analysis. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5487251. [PMID: 31069388 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doz031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Revised: 02/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been proposed as a less invasive, more appealing alternative intervention to fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes following MSA for GERD control in comparison with laparoscopic fundoplication. A systematic electronic search for articles was performed in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for single-arm cohort studies or comparative studies (with fundoplication) evaluating the use of MSA. A random-effects meta-analysis for postoperative proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQOL), gas bloating, ability to belch, dysphagia, and reoperation was performed. The systematic review identified 6 comparative studies of MSA versus fundoplication and 13 single-cohort studies. Following MSA, only 13.2% required postoperative PPI therapy, 7.8% dilatation, 3.3% device removal or reoperation, and esophageal erosion was seen in 0.3%. There was no significant difference between the groups in requirement for postoperative PPI therapy (pooled odds ratio, POR = 1.08; 95%CI 0.40-2.95), GERD-HRQOL score (weighted mean difference, WMD = 0.34; 95%CI -0.70-1.37), dysphagia (POR = 0.94; 95%CI 0.57-1.55), and reoperation (POR = 1.23; 95%CI 0.26-5.8). However, when compared to fundoplication MSA was associated with significantly less gas bloating (POR = 0.34; 95%CI 0.16-0.71) and a greater ability to belch (POR = 12.34; 95%CI 6.43-23.7). In conclusion, magnetic sphincter augmentation achieves good GERD symptomatic control similar to that of fundoplication, with the benefit of less gas bloating. The safety of MSA also appears acceptable with only 3.3% of patients requiring device removal. There is an urgent need for randomized data directly comparing fundoplication with MSA for the treatment of GERD to truly evaluate the efficacy of this treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Guidozzi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Wiggins
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Ahmed R Ahmed
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - George B Hanna
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Sheraz R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Buckley FP, Havemann B, Chawla A. Magnetic sphincter augmentation: Optimal patient selection and referral care pathways. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11:472-476. [PMID: 31523378 PMCID: PMC6715569 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v11.i8.472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Outcomes associated with magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have been reported, however the optimal population for MSA and the related patient care pathways have not been summarized. This Minireview presents evidence that describes the optimal patient population for MSA, delineates diagnostics to identify these patients, and outlines opportunities for improving GERD patient care pathways. Relevant publications from MEDLINE/EMBASE and guidelines were identified from 2000-2018. Clinical experts contextualized the evidence based on clinical experience. The optimal MSA population may be the 2.2-2.4% of GERD patients who, despite optimal medical management, continue experiencing symptoms of heartburn and/or uncontrolled regurgitation, have abnormal pH, and have intact esophageal function as determined by high resolution manometry. Diagnostic work-ups include ambulatory pH monitoring, high-resolution manometry, barium swallow, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. GERD patients may present with a range of typical or atypical symptoms. In addition to primary care providers (PCPs) and gastroenterologists (GIs), other specialties involved may include otolaryngologists, allergists, pulmonologists, among others. Objective diagnostic testing is required to ascertain surgical necessity for GERD. Current referral pathways for GERD management are suboptimal. Opportunities exist for enabling patients, PCPs, GIs, and surgeons to act as a team in developing evidence-based optimal care plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Paul Buckley
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, United States
| | | | - Amarpreet Chawla
- Department of Health Economics and Market Access, Ethicon Inc. (Johnson and Johnson), Cincinnati, OH 45242, United States
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ayazi S, Zaidi AH, Zheng P, Chovanec K, Chowdhury N, Salvitti M, Newhams K, Levy J, Hoppo T, Jobe BA. Comparison of surgical payer costs and implication on the healthcare expenses between laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in a large healthcare system. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:2279-2286. [PMID: 31376004 PMCID: PMC7113225 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07021-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a promising antireflux surgical treatment. The cost associated with the device may be perceived as a drawback by payers, which may limit the adoption of this technique. There are limited data regarding the cost of MSA in the management of reflux disease. The aims of the study were to report the clinical outcome and quality of life measures in patients after MSA and to compare the pharmaceutical and procedure payer costs and the disease-related and overall expense of MSA compared to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) from a payer perspective. Methods and procedures This prospective observational study was performed in conjunction with the region’s largest health insurance company. Data were collected on patients who underwent MSA over a 2-year period beginning in September 2015 at the study network hospitals. The LNF comparison group was procured from members’ claims data of the payer. Inclusion was predicated by patients having continuous coverage during study period. The total procedural reimbursement and the disease-related and overall medical claims submitted up to 12 months prior to surgery and up to 12 months following surgery were obtained. The payer reimbursement data are presented as allowed cost per member per month (PMPM). These values were then compared between groups. Results There were 195 patients who underwent MSA and 1131 that had LNF. MSA results in comparable symptom control, PPI elimination rate, and quality of life measures compared to values reported for LNF in the literature. The median (IQR) reimbursement of surgery was $13,522 (13,195–14,439) for those who underwent MSA and $13,388 (9951–16,261) for patients with LNF, p = 0.02. In patients who underwent MSA, the median reimbursement related to the upper gastrointestinal disease was $ 305 PMPM, at 12 months prior to surgery and $ 104 at 12 months after surgery, representing 66% decrease in cost. These values were $ 233 PMPM and $126 PMPM for patients who underwent LNF, representing a 46% decrease (p = 0.0001). At 12 months following surgery, the reimbursement for overall medical expenses had decreased by 10.7% in the MSA group and 1.4% in the LNF group when compared to the preoperative baseline reimbursement. The reimbursement for PPI use after surgery showed a 95% decrease in the MSA group and 90% among LNF group when compared to the preoperative baseline (p = 0.10). Conclusion When compared with LNF, MSA results in a reduction of disease-related expenses for the payer in the year following surgery. While MSA is associated with a higher procedural payer cost compared to LNF, payer costs may offset due to reduction in the expenses after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahin Ayazi
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Ali H Zaidi
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Ping Zheng
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Kristy Chovanec
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Nobel Chowdhury
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Madison Salvitti
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Kirsten Newhams
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Jonathan Levy
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Toshitaka Hoppo
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA
| | - Blair A Jobe
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, 4815 Liberty Avenue, Suite 439, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bell R, Lipham J, Louie B, Williams V, Luketich J, Hill M, Richards W, Dunst C, Lister D, McDowell-Jacobs L, Reardon P, Woods K, Gould J, Buckley FP, Kothari S, Khaitan L, Smith CD, Park A, Smith C, Jacobsen G, Abbas G, Katz P. Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus double-dose proton pump inhibitors for management of moderate-to-severe regurgitation in GERD: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89:14-22.e1. [PMID: 30031018 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS GERD patients frequently complain of regurgitation of gastric contents. Medical therapy with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) is frequently ineffective in alleviating regurgitation symptoms, because PPIs do nothing to restore a weak lower esophageal sphincter. Our aim was to compare effectiveness of increased PPI dosing with laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with moderate-to-severe regurgitation despite once-daily PPI therapy. METHODS One hundred fifty-two patients with GERD, aged ≥21 years with moderate-to-severe regurgitation despite 8 weeks of once-daily PPI therapy, were prospectively enrolled at 21 U.S. sites. Participants were randomized 2:1 to treatment with twice-daily (BID) PPIs (N = 102) or to laparoscopic MSA (N = 50). Standardized foregut symptom questionnaires and ambulatory esophageal reflux monitoring were performed at baseline and at 6 months. Relief of regurgitation, improvement in foregut questionnaire scores, decrease in esophageal acid exposure and reflux events, discontinuation of PPIs, and adverse events were the measures of efficacy. RESULTS Per protocol, 89% (42/47) of treated patients with MSA reported relief of regurgitation compared with 10% (10/101) of the BID PPI group (P < .001) at the 6-month primary endpoint. By intention-to-treat analysis, 84% (42/50) of patients in the MSA group and 10% (10/102) in the BID PPI group met this primary endpoint (P < .001). Eighty-one percent (38/47) of patients with MSA versus 8% (7/87) of patients with BID PPI had ≥50% improvement in GERD-health-related quality of life scores (P < .001), and 91% (43/47) remained off of PPI therapy. A normal number of reflux episodes and acid exposures was observed in 91% (40/44) and 89% (39/44) of MSA patients, respectively, compared with 58% (46/79) (P < .001) and 75% (59/79) (P = .065) of BID PPI patients at 6 months. No significant safety issues were observed. In MSA patients, 28% reported transient dysphagia; 4% reported ongoing dysphagia. CONCLUSION Patients with GERD with moderate-to-severe regurgitation, especially despite once-daily PPI treatment, should be considered for minimally invasive treatment with MSA rather than increased PPI therapy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02505945.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reginald Bell
- Institute of Esophageal and Reflux Surgery, Englewood, Colorado, USA
| | - John Lipham
- Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Brian Louie
- Swedish Cancer Institute and Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - James Luketich
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Hill
- Adirondack Surgical Group, Saranac Lake, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Dan Lister
- Arkansas Heartburn Treatment Center, Heber Springs, Arkansas, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jon Gould
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | - Leena Khaitan
- University Hospitals, Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Adrian Park
- Anne Arundel Health System, Annapolis, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Garth Jacobsen
- University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Ghulam Abbas
- West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a modern treatment option for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, laparoscopic fundoplication remains the gold standard. The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes of MSA patients at a reflux center. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of all patients that underwent MSA between March 2012 and November 2017. Out of 110 patients, 68 with a follow-up >3 months were included. Postoperative gastrointestinal symptoms, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) intake, GERD-Health-related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) and alimentary satisfaction (AS) were assessed. Postoperative esophageal functioning tests were performed in 50% of patients. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients underwent MSA; hiatal repair was performed in 31 cases. The median OR time was 27 min, and no intraoperative complications occurred. The median follow-up was 13 months (IQR 4.2-45). Endoscopic dilatation was performed in 2 patients (3%) and device removal in another 2 cases. The postoperative GERD-HRQL score was significantly reduced (3 vs. 24; p < 0.001) and the median AS was 8/10. Preoperative experienced heartburn, regurgitations and dysphagia were eliminated in 92, 96 and 100%. Postoperative new-onset difficulties swallowing with solids only were reported to occur occasionally by 16% and rarely by 21% of patients. Satisfaction with heartburn relief was 95%, and the overall outcome was rated excellent/good in 89%. PPI dependency was eliminated in 87%. The median total percentage pH < 4 and number of reflux episodes were significantly reduced. Postoperative pH results were negative or slightly above the norm in 79% and 12%, respectively. CONCLUSION Sphincter augmentation results in significantly reduced reflux symptoms, increased GERD-specific Quality of Life and excellent alimentary satisfaction with low perioperative morbidity. This procedure should be considered an excellent alternative to fundoplication in the treatment of GERD.
Collapse
|
31
|
Zadeh J, Andreoni A, Treitl D, Ben-David K. Spotlight on the Linx™ Reflux Management System for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: evidence and research. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2018; 11:291-300. [PMID: 30214323 PMCID: PMC6124788 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s113679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The initial approach to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) management typically involves lifestyle modification and medical therapy utilizing acid reducing agents such as histamine blockers and proton pump inhibitors. In severe cases refractory to such treatments, surgical therapy may be indicated. The gold standard for surgical treatment of GERD is the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. In recent years, a new technique known as magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has been developed using the Linx™ Reflux Management System. This is an implantable ring of magnetic beads that is placed around the esophagus at the gastroesophageal junction to restore lower esophageal integrity. The aim of this review is to discuss the current literature regarding indications, surgical technique, efficacy, and complications of MSA using the Linx device. METHODS A standardized literature search was performed yielding 367 abstracts. After elimination due to duplicates between databases and irrelevance, 96 articles remained. The information found to be significant and non-redundant was included in this review. CONCLUSION After several years of clinical application, the Linx device has been shown to not only be effective for the management of GERD but also be as effective as fundoplication. With respect to safety, the most common complication of MSA is dysphagia. This often resolved without intervention, but esophageal dilation or device explanation are occasionally necessary. Not fully appreciated in earlier reviews, erosion of the device into the esophagus appears to be the most significant complication of the device after extended follow-up. While very rare, the potentially severe consequences of this phenomenon suggest that the device should be used with some restraint and that patients should be made aware of this potential morbidity. Fortunately, in the few cases of device erosion described in the literature reviewed, the Linx device was easily and safely removed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Zadeh
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA,
| | - Anthony Andreoni
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA,
| | - Daniela Treitl
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA,
| | - Kfir Ben-David
- Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, FL, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies. Updates Surg 2018; 70:323-330. [DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0569-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
33
|
Minimal versus obligatory dissection of the diaphragmatic hiatus during magnetic sphincter augmentation surgery. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:782-788. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6343-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/06/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
34
|
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Current Concepts on Etiology and Pathophysiology and Its Role in Dysphagia. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40136-018-0192-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
35
|
Crural Closure improves Outcomes of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in GERD patients with Hiatal Hernia. Sci Rep 2018; 8:7319. [PMID: 29743599 PMCID: PMC5943411 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24322-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic sphincter-augmentation (MSA) has been proven effective in the treatment of GERD. No consensus exists on whether crural closure should be performed. Our aim was to assess the impact of cruroplasty on reflux-control and quality of life. MSA-Patients treated between 03/2012-03/2017 were classified into those without hiatal hernia ("NHH"), those post-MSA (NHR) and those post-MSA/hiatal repair (HR). GERD-symptoms, PPI-intake, GERD-Health-related-Quality-of-Life (GERD-HRQL) and Alimentary Satisfaction were assessed. Sixty-eight patients underwent MSA, 26 patients had additional crural closure. PH-monitoring was negative in 80% of HR, 73% of NHR and 89% of NHH-patients. GERD-HRQL-total scores decreased significantly in all groups (p < 0.001). Alimentary satisfaction was 8/10 in HR/NHH and 10/10 in NHR-patients. Satisfaction with heartburn relief was high (HR: 96%, NR: 95%, NHH: 94%) as was the elimination of PPI-intake (HR/NHH: 87%, NR: 86%). Heartburn and regurgitations were eliminated in 100% of HR, 88% and 94% of NHR and 87% and 91% of NHH-patients. Endoscopic dilatation or device explantation was performed in 3% each. MSA leads to significant symptom relief, increased quality of life and alimentary satisfaction with low perioperative morbidity. Cruroplasty tends to result in better reflux control and symptom relief than exclusive MSA without increasing dysphagia rates.
Collapse
|
36
|
Aiolfi A, Asti E, Bernardi D, Bonitta G, Rausa E, Siboni S, Bonavina L. Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 52:82-88. [PMID: 29471155 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 02/15/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication (LF) are currently considered gold-standard surgical treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) is an innovative surgical procedure that has been showed to be effective to control GERD symptoms and to reduce esophageal acid exposure. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare early outcomes of LF and MSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were consulted matching the terms "Gastroesophageal reflux or heartburn", "LINX or magnetic sphincter augmentation" and "fundoplication". Pooled effect measures were calculated using an inverse-variance weighted or Mantel-Haenszel in random effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated using I2-index and Cochrane Q-test. Meta-regression was used to address the effect of potential confounders. RESULTS Seven observational cohort studies, published between 2014 and 2017, matched the inclusion criteria. Overall, 1211 patients, 686 MSA and 525 LF, were included. Postoperative morbidity ranged from 0 to 3% in the MSA group and from 0 to 7% in the LF group, and there was no mortality. Dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilatation occurred in 9.3% and 6.6% of patients respectively (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 0.61-3.95, p = 0.119). The pooled OR of gas/bloat symptoms, ability to vomit, and ability to belch were 0.39 (95% CI 0.25-0.61; p < 0.001), 10.10 (95% CI 5.33-19.15; p < 0.001), and 5.53 (95% CI 3.73-8.19; p < 0.001), respectively. The postoperative GERD-HRQL was similar (p = 0.101). The pooled OR of PPI suspension, endoscopic dilation, and reoperation were similar in the two patients groups (p = 0.548, p = 0.119, p = 0.183, respectively). CONCLUSION Both anti-reflux procedures are safe and effective up to 1-year follow-up. PPI suspension rate, dysphagia requiring endoscopic dilatation, and disease-related quality of life are similar in the two patient groups. MSA is associated with less gas/bloat symptoms and increased ability to vomit and belch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Aiolfi
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Italy.
| | - Emanuele Asti
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Italy.
| | - Daniele Bernardi
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Italy.
| | - Gianluca Bonitta
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Italy.
| | - Emanuele Rausa
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Italy.
| | - Stefano Siboni
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Italy.
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- University of Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rona KA, Tatum JM, Zehetner J, Schwameis K, Chow C, Samakar K, Dobrowolsky A, Houghton CC, Bildzukewicz N, Lipham JC. Hiatal hernia recurrence following magnetic sphincter augmentation and posterior cruroplasty: intermediate-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:3374-3379. [PMID: 29340828 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6059-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We have previously reported short-term outcomes after hiatal hernia repair (HHR) at the time of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Here we report intermediate-term outcomes and hernia recurrence rate after concomitant MSA and HHR. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent repair of a hiatal hernia 3 cm or larger at the time of MSA implantation between May 2009 and December 2015. The primary endpoint was hiatal hernia recurrence identified by routine postoperative videoesophagography or endoscopy. Recurrence was defined by a 2 cm or greater upward displacement of the stomach through the diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus. Secondary endpoints included cessation of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), persistent dysphagia requiring intervention, and GERD health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) scores 1 year from surgery. RESULTS During the study period, 47 of 53 (89%) patients underwent concomitant MSA with HHR and complied with surveillance. Hiatal hernias ranged from 3 to 7 cm (mean 4 ± 1). Mean clinical follow-up time was 19 months (range 1-39). GERD-HRQL score decreased from 20.3 to 3.1 (p < .001), 89% of patients remained off PPIs, and 97% of patients reported improvement or resolution of symptoms. Two recurrent hiatal hernias were identified on surveillance imaging for a recurrence rate of 4.3% at a mean 18 (± 10) months after initial operation. Persistent dysphagia occurred in 13% (6/47) over the first year, which resolved after a single balloon dilation in 67% (4/6). Two patients elected for device removal due to dilation-refractory dysphagia and persistent reflux symptoms. CONCLUSION Concomitant magnetic sphincter augmentation and hiatal hernia repair in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and a moderate-sized hiatal hernia demonstrates durable subjective reflux control and an acceptable hiatal hernia recurrence rate at 1- to 2-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Carol Chow
- Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Caitlin C Houghton
- Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - Nikolai Bildzukewicz
- Keck Hospital of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | - John C Lipham
- Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA. .,Keck Hospital of USC, 1510 San Pablo St., HCC Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Favorable results from a prospective evaluation of 200 patients with large hiatal hernias undergoing LINX magnetic sphincter augmentation. Surg Endosc 2017; 32:1762-1768. [PMID: 28936790 PMCID: PMC5845067 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5859-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) of the lower esophageal sphincter restores the antireflux barrier in patients with hiatal hernias ≤3 cm. We performed a prospective study in patients undergoing MSA with the LINX device during repair of paraesophageal and hernias over 3 cm axial component. Methods and procedures Multicenter, prospective study of consecutive patients treated with MSA at the time of repair of hiatal hernias >3 cm. Results 200 patients (110 female) were treated between March 2014 and February 2017 via laparoscopic hernia repair and MSA. Mean age was 59.5 years, mean BMI 29.4. 40% had esophagitis, 20% intestinal metaplasia, 72 of 77 tested had abnormal pH studies. Preoperative PPI use was reported by 87%. Eighteen patients had prior hiatal hernia/fundoplication. All had normal function. 78% of patients had axial hiatal hernia ≥5 cm or large paraesophageal component. Mean operative time was 81 min (38–193), EBL was 10 cc. Non-permanent mesh reinforcement of hiatal repair was performed in 83% of the patients. There were two readmissions for dehydration; 2 patients with pulmonary embolism, and 1 patient with cardiac ischemia. Nineteen patients required dilation. 156 pts were followed at a median of 8.6 months. GERD-HRQL scores improved from 26 preoperatively to 2 postoperatively. Complete PPI independence was achieved in 94% (147/156). Videoesophagram in 51 patients at median 11 months found 3 asymptomatic hernias <3 cm. One symptomatic patient underwent successful repair of the hernia without MSA manipulation. There have been no device explants, erosions, or migrations to date. Conclusions This prospective study of 200 patients with >3 cm hernias undergoing MSA with hiatoplasty resulted in favorable outcomes with median of 9 months follow-up. Comparing this to published reports of MSA in patients with <3 cm hernias, the safety and clinical efficacy of MSA are independent of initial hernia size.
Collapse
|
39
|
Ganz RA. A Modern Magnetic Implant for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15:1326-1337. [PMID: 28025156 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
A magnetic implant for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was Food and Drug Administration-approved in 2012 and has been extensively evaluated. The device is a ring of magnets that are placed around the gastroesophageal junction, augmenting the native lower esophageal sphincter and preventing reflux yet preserving lower esophageal sphincter physiologic function and allowing belching and vomiting. Magnetic force is advantageous, being permanent and precise, and forces between magnets decrease with esophageal displacement. Multiple patient cohorts have been studied using the magnetic device, and trials establish consistent, long-term improvement in pH data, GERD symptom scores, and proton-pump inhibitor use. A 5-year Food and Drug Administration trial demonstrated that most patients achieved normal pH scores, 85% stopped proton-pump inhibitors, and GERD health-related quality of life symptom scores improved from 27 to 4 at 5 years. Seven studies have compared magnetic augmentation with laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and demonstrated that the magnetic device achieved comparable efficacy with regard to proton-pump inhibitor cessation, GERD symptom score improvement, and heartburn and regurgitation scores. However, to date there have been no randomized, controlled trials comparing the 2 techniques, and the study cohorts are not necessarily comparable regarding hiatal hernia size, severity of reflux, body mass index scores, or esophagitis scores. Dysphagia incidence was similar in both groups. Reoperation rates and safety profiles were also comparable, but the magnetic device demonstrated significant beneficial differences in allowing belching and vomiting. The magnetic device is safe, with the main adverse event being dysphagia with an approximate 3%-5% chronic incidence. Device removals in clinical trials have been between 0% and 7% and were uneventful. There have been no erosions, perforations, or infections in FDA clinical trials; erosions have rarely been noted in practice. Magnetic augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter is a safe and effective operation for GERD, and should be considered a surgical option for those seeking a fundic-sparing operation, particularly those with parameters consistent with study cohorts. Additional randomized, controlled trials are underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert A Ganz
- Minnesota Gastroenterology, PA, Plymouth, Minnesota; Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
SAGES technology and value assessment committee (TAVAC) safety and effectiveness analysis: LINX ® reflux management system. Surg Endosc 2017; 31:3811-3826. [PMID: 28842765 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5813-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
41
|
Manometric Changes to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter After Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation in Patients With Chronic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Ann Surg 2017; 266:99-104. [PMID: 27464617 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the manometric changes, function, and impact of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). BACKGROUND Implantation of a MSA around the gastroesophageal junction has been shown to be a safe and effective therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease, but its effect on the LES has not been elucidated. METHODS Retrospective case control study (n = 121) evaluating manometric changes after MSA. Inclusion criteria consisted of a confirmed diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease by an abnormal esophageal pH study (body mass index <35 kg/m, hiatal hernia <3 cm, and absence of endoscopic Barrett disease). Manometric changes, pH testing, and proton pump inhibitor use were assessed preoperatively and 6 and 12 months after MSA. RESULTS MSA was associated with an overall increase in the median LES resting pressure (18 pre-MSA vs 23 mm Hg post-MSA; P = 0.0003), residual pressure (4 vs 9 mm Hg; P < 0.0001), and distal esophageal contraction amplitude (80 vs 90 mm Hg; P = 0.02). The percent peristalsis remained unaltered (94% vs 87%; P = 0.71).Overall, patients with a manometrically defective LES were restored 67% of the time to a normal sphincter with MSA. Those with a structurally defective or severely defective LES improved to a normal LES in 77% and 56% of patients, respectively. Only 18% of patients with a normal preoperative manometric LES deteriorated to a lower category. CONCLUSION MSA results in significant manometric improvement of the LES without apparent deleterious effects on the esophageal body. A manometrically defective LES can be restored to normal sphincter, whereas a normal LES remains stable.
Collapse
|
42
|
Warren HF, Brown LM, Mihura M, Farivar AS, Aye RW, Louie BE. Factors influencing the outcome of magnetic sphincter augmentation for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 2017; 32:405-412. [PMID: 28664433 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5696-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a surgical treatment option for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). MSA consistently improves quality of life, maintains freedom from PPIs, and objectively controls GERD. However, up to 24% of patients did not achieve these outcomes. We sought to identify factors predicting outcomes after MSA placement with the aim of refining selection criteria. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical, endoscopic, manometric, pH data, and intraoperative factors from two databases: Pivotal Trial (N = 99) and our prospectively maintained esophageal database (N = 71). A priori outcomes were defined as excellent (GERD-HRQL <5, no PPI, no esophagitis), good (GERD-HRQL 6-15, no PPI, grade A esophagitis), fair (GERD-HRQL 16 to 25, PPI use, grade B esophagitis), and poor (GERD-HRQL >25, PPI use, grade C/D esophagitis). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of achieving an excellent/good outcome. RESULTS A total of 170 patients underwent MSA with a median age of 53 years, [43-60] and a median BMI of 27 (IQR = 24-30). At baseline, 93.5% of patients experienced typical symptoms and 69% atypical symptoms. Median DeMeester score was 37.9 (IQR 27.9-51.2) with a structurally intact sphincter in 47%. Esophagitis occurred in 43%. At 48 [19-60] months after MSA, excellent outcomes were achieved in 47%, good in 28%, fair in 22%, and poor in 3%. Median DeMeester score was 15.6 (IQR = 5.8-26.6), esophagitis in 17.6% and daily PPI use in 17%. At univariable analysis, excellent/good outcomes were negatively impacted by BMI, preoperative LES residual pressure, Hill grade, and hiatal hernia. At multivariable analysis, BMI >35 (OR = 0.05, 0.003-0.78, p = 0.03), structurally defective LES (OR = 0.37, 0.13-0.99, p = 0.05), and preoperative LES residual pressure (OR = 0.89, 0.80-0.98, p = 0.02) were independent negative predictors of excellent/good outcome. CONCLUSIONS Magnetic sphincter augmentation results in excellent/good outcomes in most patients but a higher BMI, structurally defective sphincter, and elevated LES residual pressure may prevent this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa M Brown
- Section of Thoracic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Matias Mihura
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center and Cancer Institute, 1101 Madison Street Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| | - Alexander S Farivar
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center and Cancer Institute, 1101 Madison Street Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| | - Ralph W Aye
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center and Cancer Institute, 1101 Madison Street Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA
| | - Brian E Louie
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Swedish Medical Center and Cancer Institute, 1101 Madison Street Suite 900, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation versus Nissen Fundoplication for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Short Term: A Meta-Analysis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2017:9596342. [PMID: 28466002 PMCID: PMC5390656 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9596342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. The efficacy of Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation (MSA) and its outcomes for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) are uncertain. Therefore, we aimed to summarize and analyze the efficacy of two treatments for GERD. Methods. The meta-analysis search was performed, using four databases. All studies from 2005 to 2016 were included. Pooled effect was calculated using either the fixed or random effects model. Results. A total of 4 trials included 624 patients and aimed to evaluate the differences in proton-pump inhibitor use, complications, and adverse events. MSA had a shorter operative time (MSA and NF: RR = -18.80, 95% CI: -24.57 to -13.04, and P = 0.001) and length of stay (RR = -14.21, 95% CI: -24.18 to -4.23, and P = 0.005). Similar proton-pump inhibitor use, complication (P = 0.19), and severe dysphagia for dilation were shown in both groups. Although there is no difference between the MSA and NF in the number of adverse events, the incidence of postoperative gas or bloating (RR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.94, and P = 0.02) showed significantly different results. However, there is no significant difference in ability to belch and ability to vomit. Conclusions. MSA can be recommended as an alternative treatment for GERD according to their short-term studies, especially in main-features of gas-bloating, due to shorter operative time and less complication of gas or bloating.
Collapse
|
44
|
LINX ® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:3078-3084. [PMID: 27981382 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5370-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2016] [Accepted: 11/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The LINX® magnetic sphincter augmentation system (MSA) is a surgical technique with short-term evidence demonstrating efficacy in the treatment of medically refractory or chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Currently, the Nissen fundoplication is the gold-standard surgical treatment for GERD. We are the first to systematically review the literature and perform a meta-analysis comparing MSA to the Nissen fundoplication. METHODS A comprehensive search of electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library) using search terms "Gastroesophageal reflux or heartburn" and "LINX or endoluminal or magnetic" and "fundoplication or Nissen" was completed. All randomized controlled trials, non-randomized comparison study and case series with greater than 5 patients were included. Five hundred and forty-seven titles were identified through primary search, and 197 titles or abstracts were screened after removing duplicates. Meta-analysis was performed on postoperative quality of life outcomes, procedural efficacy and patient procedural satisfaction. RESULTS Three primary studies identified a total of 688 patients, of whom 273 and 415 underwent Nissen fundoplication and MSA, respectively. MSA was statistically superior to LNF in preserving patient's ability to belch (95.2 vs 65.9%, p < 0.00001) and ability to emesis (93.5 vs 49.5%, p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between MSA and LNF in gas/bloating (26.7 vs 53.4%, p = 0.06), postoperative dysphagia (33.9 vs 47.1%, p = 0.43) and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) elimination (81.4 vs 81.5%, p = 0.68). CONCLUSION Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to be an effective treatment for GERD with short-term outcomes comparable to the more technically challenging and time-consuming Nissen fundoplication. Long-term comparative outcome data past 1 year are needed in order to further understand the efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation.
Collapse
|
45
|
Bonavina L, Attwood S. Laparoscopic alternatives to fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux: the role of magnetic augmentation and electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29:996-1001. [PMID: 26676715 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Reflux symptoms are very common, and despite modern medication they are a major cause of disease burden and loss of quality of life worldwide. Laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery is the only current effective alternative but suffers from the risks of long-term side effects. Surgery also suffers variation in standards and outcomes. Magnetic augmentation and electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter represent promising innovative procedures in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Bonavina
- Department of Surgery, University of Milano Medical School, Milan, Italy
| | - S Attwood
- Department of Health Services Research, Durham University Medical School, Durham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rona KA, Reynolds J, Schwameis K, Zehetner J, Samakar K, Oh P, Vong D, Sandhu K, Katkhouda N, Bildzukewicz N, Lipham JC. Efficacy of magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with large hiatal hernias. Surg Endosc 2016; 31:2096-2102. [PMID: 27553803 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5204-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has demonstrated long-term safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), but its efficacy in patients with large hiatal hernias has yet to be proven. The aim of our study was to assess outcomes of MSA in patients with hiatal hernias ≥3 cm. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent MSA at our institutions over a 6-year period. Information obtained consisted of patient demographics, symptoms of GERD, preoperative GERD Health-Related Quality-of-Life (HRQL) scores, perioperative details, and implantation of the MSA device. Primary endpoints included postoperative GERD-HRQL scores, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, symptom change, and procedure-related complications. A large hiatal hernia was defined as a hernia measuring ≥3 cm by intraoperative measurement. RESULTS A total of 192 patients were reviewed. Median follow-up was 20 months (3-75 months). Mean GERD-HRQL scores in the overall population before and after MSA were 18.9 and 5.0, respectively (p < 0.001). In the majority of patients symptoms improved or resolved (N = 177, p < 0.001). Fifty-two patients (27.0 %) had a hiatal hernia ≥3 cm (range 3-7 cm). Their mean GERD-HRQL score decreased from 20.5 to 3.6 (p < 0.001) following MSA. When compared to patients with smaller hernias, patients with large hiatal hernias had decreased postoperative PPI requirement (9.6 vs. 26.6 %, p = 0.011) and lower mean postoperative GERD-HRQL scores (3.6 vs. 5.6, p = 0.027). The percent of patients requiring postoperative intervention for dysphagia was similar (13.5 vs. 17.9 %, p = 0.522), as was the incidence of symptom resolution or improvement (98.1 vs. 91.3 %, p = 0.118). CONCLUSION MSA in patients with large hiatal hernias demonstrates decreased postoperative PPI requirement and mean GERD-HRQL scores compared to patients with smaller hernias. The incidence of symptom resolution or improvement and the percentage of patients requiring intervention for dysphagia are similar. Short-term outcomes of MSA are encouraging in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and large hiatal hernias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kais A Rona
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Joerg Zehetner
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, 1510 San Pablo St., HCC Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Kamran Samakar
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, 1510 San Pablo St., HCC Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Paul Oh
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David Vong
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kulmeet Sandhu
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, 1510 San Pablo St., HCC Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Namir Katkhouda
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, 1510 San Pablo St., HCC Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Nikolai Bildzukewicz
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, 1510 San Pablo St., HCC Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - John C Lipham
- Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,Department of General Surgery, Keck Hospital of USC, 1510 San Pablo St., HCC Suite 514, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA. .,James and Pamela Muzzy Endowed Chair in Gastrointestinal Cancer, Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian, Newport Beach, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Asti E, Bonitta G, Lovece A, Lazzari V, Bonavina L. Longitudinal comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication versus magnetic sphincter augmentation: Observational cohort study with propensity score analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95:e4366. [PMID: 27472725 PMCID: PMC5265862 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000004366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Only a minority of patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) are offered a surgical option. This is mostly due to the fear of potential side effects, the variable success rate, and the extreme alteration of gastric anatomy with the current gold standard, the laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. It has been reported that laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) and laparoscopic sphincter augmentation using a magnetic device (LINX) can treat reflux more physiologically and with a lower incidence of side-effects and reoperation rate. We present the first comparing quality of life in patients undergoing LTF versus LINX.Observational cohort study. Consecutive patients undergoing LTF or LINX over the same time period were compared by using the propensity score full matching method and generalized estimating equation. Criteria of exclusion were >3 cm hiatal hernia, grade C-D esophagitis, ineffective esophageal motility, body mass index >35, and previous upper abdominal surgery. The primary study outcome was quality of life measured with the Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes were proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use, presence of gas-related symptoms or dysphagia, and reoperation-free probability.Between March 2007 and July 2014, 238 patients with GERD met the criteria of inclusion in the study. Of these, 103 underwent an LTF and 135 a LINX procedure. All patients had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Over time, patients in both groups had similar GERD-HRQL scores (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.27; P = 0.578), PPI use (OR 1.18, CI 0.81-1.70; P = 0.388), gas-related symptoms (OR 0.69, CI 0.21-2.28; P = 0.542), dysphagia (OR 0.62, CI 0.26-1.30; P = 0.241), and reoperation-free probability (stratified log-rank test = 0.556).In 2 concurrent cohorts of patients with early stage GERD undergoing LTF or LINX and matched by propensity score analysis, health-related quality of life significantly improved and GERD-HRQL scores had a similar decreasing trend over time up to 7 years of follow-up. We conclude that LTF and LINX provide similar disease-specific quality of life over time in patients with early stage GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Division of General Surgery, University of Milan Medical School, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: Luigi Bonavina, Dipartimento di Chirurgia, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Malan 2, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Johnston N, Ondrey F, Rosen R, Hurley BP, Gould J, Allen J, DelGaudio J, Altman KW. Airway reflux. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016; 1381:5-13. [PMID: 27310222 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
An ever-increasing number of adult and pediatric disorders have been shown to be influenced or caused by airway reflux. This has become a controversial and complicated aspect of medicine that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Evidence indicates that it is not only the acidic components of gastric refluxate that injure extraesophageal tissues but also the nonacidic components, such as pepsin and bile. There is a realization that proton pump inhibitors will not be effective when nonacidic components of refluxate are causing the problem. New in vitro and in vivo models for the study of airway reflux and new therapeutic and surgical approaches are discussed in this review article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikki Johnston
- Departments of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, and Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
| | - Frank Ondrey
- Department of Otolaryngology and Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Duluth, Minnesota
| | - Rachel Rosen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Boston's Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bryan P Hurley
- Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jon Gould
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Jacquie Allen
- Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - John DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Kenneth W Altman
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, Lipham JC, Smith CD, DeVault KR, Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Luketich JD, Smith CC, Schlack-Haerer SC, Kothari SN, Dunst CM, Watson TJ, Peters J, Oelschlager BK, Perry KA, Melvin S, Bemelman WA, Smout AJPM, Dunn D. Long-term Outcomes of Patients Receiving a Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Device for Gastroesophageal Reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14:671-7. [PMID: 26044316 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.05.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2015] [Revised: 05/09/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Based on results from year 2 of a 5-year trial, in 2012 the US Food and Drug Administration approved the use of a magnetic device to augment lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We report the final results of 5 years of follow-up evaluation of patients who received this device. METHODS We performed a prospective study of the safety and efficacy of a magnetic device in 100 adults with GERD for 6 months or more, who were partially responsive to daily proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and had evidence of pathologic esophageal acid exposure, at 14 centers in the United States and The Netherlands. The magnetic device was placed using standard laparoscopic tools and techniques. Eighty-five subjects were followed up for 5 years to evaluate quality of life, reflux control, use of PPIs, and side effects. The GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire was administered at baseline to patients on and off PPIs, and after placement of the device; patients served as their own controls. A partial response to PPIs was defined as a GERD-HRQL score of 10 or less on PPIs and a score of 15 or higher off PPIs, or a 6-point or more improvement when scores on vs off PPI were compared. RESULTS Over the follow-up period, no device erosions, migrations, or malfunctions occurred. At baseline, the median GERD-HRQL scores were 27 in patients not taking PPIs and 11 in patients on PPIs; 5 years after device placement this score decreased to 4. All patients used PPIs at baseline; this value decreased to 15.3% at 5 years. Moderate or severe regurgitation occurred in 57% of subjects at baseline, but only 1.2% at 5 years. All patients reported the ability to belch and vomit if needed. Bothersome dysphagia was present in 5% at baseline and in 6% at 5 years. Bothersome gas-bloat was present in 52% at baseline and decreased to 8.3% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS Augmentation of the lower esophageal sphincter with a magnetic device provides significant and sustained control of reflux, with minimal side effects or complications. No new safety risks emerged over a 5-year follow-up period. These findings validate the long-term safety and efficacy of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device for patients with GERD. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT00776997.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven A Edmundowicz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - John C Lipham
- Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - C Daniel Smith
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Kenneth R DeVault
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Santiago Horgan
- Department of Surgery, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Garth Jacobsen
- Department of Surgery, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - James D Luketich
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | - Shanu N Kothari
- Department of Surgery, Gundersen Health System, LaCrosse, Wisconsin
| | - Christy M Dunst
- Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery Division, The Oregon Clinic, Portland, Oregon
| | - Thomas J Watson
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | | | | | - Kyle A Perry
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Scott Melvin
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Willem A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André J P M Smout
- Division of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dan Dunn
- Division of Surgery, Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Scarpellini E, Ang D, Pauwels A, De Santis A, Vanuytsel T, Tack J. Management of refractory typical GERD symptoms. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13:281-94. [PMID: 27075264 DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The management of patients with refractory GERD (rGERD) is a major clinical challenge for gastroenterologists. In up to 30% of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or regurgitation), acid-suppressive therapy does not provide clinical benefit. In this Review, we discuss the current management algorithm for GERD and the features and management of patients who do not respond to treatment (such as those individuals with an incorrect diagnosis of GERD, inadequate PPI intake, persisting acid reflux and persisting weakly acidic reflux). Symptom response to existing surgical techniques, novel antireflux procedures, and the value of add-on medical therapies (including prokinetics and reflux inhibitors) for rGERD symptoms are discussed. Pharmaceutical agents targeting oesophageal sensitivity, a condition that can contribute to symptom generation in rGERD, are also discussed. Finally, on the basis of available published data and our expert opinion, we present an outline of a current, usable algorithm for management of patients with rGERD that considers the timing and diagnostic use of pH-impedance monitoring on or off PPI, additional diagnostic tests, the clinical use of baclofen and the use of add-on neuromodulators (tricyclic agents and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emidio Scarpellini
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium.,Division Gastroenterology, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00100, Rome, Italy
| | - Daphne Ang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889
| | - Ans Pauwels
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Adriano De Santis
- Division of Gastroenterology, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore 529889
| | - Tim Vanuytsel
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan Tack
- Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|