Risk Factors Associated With Lung Retransplantation: Evaluation of a Nationwide Registry Over a Quarter Century

Lung retransplant. Experience of a referral centre

BACKGROUND

Lung retransplantation (LR) is a valid choice with a significant risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality in selected patients with graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Our goal is to analyse our experience in LR in terms of survival and lung function.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patients undergoing LR (1990-2019).

VARIABLES

recipients and procedure, early mortality, survival and lung function in patients with CLAD. Quantitative variables (mean±SD); qualitative (%). Student's t test or χ2 was used. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier, compared with Log Rank. A p < 0.05 was established as significant.

RESULTS

Of 784 transplanted patients, 25 patients (mean age 38.41-16.3 years, 12 men and 13 women) were LR; (CLAD (n = 19), pulmonary infarction (n = 2), airway complications (n = 2), graft dysfunction (n = 1), hyperacute rejection (n = 1), mean time to retransplantation: 5.41 ± 3.87 years in CLAD and 21.2 ± 21.4 days in non-CLAD. The 90-day mortality was 52% and 36.8% in the second period (p = 0.007), being higher in patients who required preoperative ECMO (80 vs. 20%, p = 0.04). The 1- and 5-year survival was 53.9% and 37.7%, respectively (p = 0.016). Survival of the CLAD group was greater (p = 0.08). Pre LR ECMO decreased survival (p = 0.032). After LR, FEV₁ improved an average of 0.98 ± 0.13L (25.6 ± 18.8%) (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LR is a high mortality procedure that requires careful selection of patients with better results in patients with CLAD. The lung function of patients with CLAD improved significantly.

Technique and Outcomes of Less Invasive Lung Retransplantation

BACKGROUND

Lung retransplantation is a demanding procedure with outcomes lagging primary transplantation. We implemented less invasive surgical techniques aiming at improving early outcomes. Here, we wish to describe these techniques and analyze the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Since April 2010, a protocol of less invasive techniques was applied to all lung retransplantations. This protocol comprises bilateral lung retransplantation via sternum-sparing anterolateral thoracotomies, off-pump surgery, and empiric administration of 2 g fibrinogen and 2 platelet concentrates. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed starting in April 2010 until May 2016 for this study and compared with a cohort of patients undergoing lung retransplantation between January 2005 and March 2010.

RESULTS

From April 2010 through March 2016, 774 total lung transplantations were performed at our center, 49 were retransplantations. In the era January 2005 to March 2010, a total of 480 lung transplantations were performed, 38 of those being retransplantations. Mean operation time in the era April 2010 to May 2016 was significantly longer as compared with the era January 2005 to March 2010, median time until extubation was significantly shorter in the era April 2010 to May 2016 (1 [1-2] days vs 11.5 [1-24] days; P = 0.0009). Similarly, median intensive care unit stay time was shorter in the era April 2010 to May 2016 (4 [2-5.5] days vs 12.5 [3-30.5] days; P = 0.003). Patient survival was significantly better in the era starting in April 2010 at 30 days (98% vs 76.3%, P = 0.002) as well as at 1 year (80.6% vs 63.2%; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Less invasive retransplantation of the lung via sternum-sparing anterolateral thoracotomies and off-pump is a safe procedure with low associated morbidity and favorable midterm survival.