A simplified method to pass the bar through the mediastinum in the Nuss technique

The Cross-Bar Technique for Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Key Element for Remodeling of the Entire Chest Wall

INTRODUCTION

 The multiple bar approach was developed to cover broader and heavier teenager/adult chest wall deformities. We designed the cross-bar technique to achieve remodeling of the entire chest wall. This study aimed to demonstrate the role of cross-bar and its benefits over the parallel bar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 The cross-bar technique involves placing two bars diagonally and then cross on the target. The primary purposes are to double the lifting forces by making two bars converge on a single target to lift inflexible heavy chest wall depressions or cover lower lateral areas. The results of the cross-bar and parallel bar are compared for the indications, postrepair outcomes, and complications.

RESULTS

 From 2016 to 2019, 247 patients who underwent multiple bar pectus excavatum (PE) repair were enrolled in the study: 157 with cross-bar and 90 with parallel bar. In the cross-bar group, 33% (51/157) received three bars in XI fashion to cover the upper depression. The cross-bar group was older (18.0 ± 6.1 vs. 15.7 ± 5.0), had higher depression index (1.9 ± 0.7 vs. 1.8 ± 0.3), and was less asymmetric (45% vs. 71%) than those in the parallel bar group. The overall complication rates were not different between the two groups (9.6% vs. 10%, p = 1.0), although the cross-bar group was more rigid and complex. There was no bar displacement or reoperation in both groups.

CONCLUSION

 The cross-bar technique is as safe and effective as the parallel-bar technique, even though it was selected to correct more complexities. The cross-bar technique could be a method for complex PE deformities for remodeling of the entire chest wall.

Nuss Technique for Pectus Excavatum in Adult Patients: Cosmetic Satisfaction and Improvement of Quality of Life in a Single-Center Experience

Objectives

Since its introduction, the Nuss minimally invasive procedure for pectus excavatum (PE) repair (MIRPE) has become the method of choice. The current study describes our experience of PE correction in adults, with particular focus on postoperative outcomes, pain, quality of life, and patients’ satisfaction.

Methods

We enrolled for this observational study n = 93 adult patients from 2011 to 2018. The Haller index was used to quantify PE severity. Pulmonary function tests and cardiac examinations were performed preoperatively; we developed a standardized surgical technique and postoperative treatment, including follow-up at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery and 6 months after bar removal. We also evaluated the quality of life and the satisfaction with the cosmetic result after the procedure with standardized questionnaires.

Results

No operative or perioperative deaths occurred nor life-treating complications. Thirteen complications occurred in 12 patients, with a total complication rate of 14% (n = 13/93). Pain intensity decreased in the follow-up [pain score visual analog scale at 3 months: median 1 (0–8); 12 months: median 1 (0–5); and 24 months: median 1 (0–4)]. Better or much better quality of life after the Nuss procedure was observed: n = 79 (84.1%) at 3 months, n = 80 (86%) at 12 months, and n = 85 (91.4%) at 24 months. After 2 years of observation, more than 90% of patients described improvement in their quality of life and satisfaction with the cosmetic results. Only a very small group of patients suffered from pain in the follow-up.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that the MIRPE procedure is safe and can be performed with excellent results in adults both for improvement of quality of life and for satisfaction with cosmetic results.