Management of Stage IIIA (N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Transatlantic Perspective

Comparison of Treatment Strategies for Patients With Clinical Stage T1-3/N2 Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic strategies for clinical stage T1-3N2 (cT1-3N2) lung cancer are controversial. For operable tumors, treatment can vary by center, region, and continent. This study aimed to identify the optimal therapeutic method and type of surgical strategy for cT1-3N2 lung cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective evaluation analyzed the records of 17,954 patients with cT1-3N2 lung cancer treated in 2010 through 2015 from the SEER database. The effects of different therapeutic methods and types of surgical strategies on overall survival (OS) were assessed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The 5-year OS rates were 27.7% for patients with T1N2 disease, 21.8% for those with T2N2 disease, and 19.9% for T3N2 disease. Neoadjuvant therapy plus operation (OP) plus adjuvant therapy, and OP plus adjuvant therapy, provided better 5-year OS rates than OP alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (34.1%, 37.7%, 29.3%, and 16.1%, respectively). In the T1N2, T2N2, and T3N2 groups, lobectomy provided better 5-year OS than pneumonectomy, sublobectomy, and no surgery. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that young age, female sex, well-differentiated histologic grade, adenocarcinoma cell type, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, lobectomy, and T1 stage were statistically associated with better 5-year OS rates.

CONCLUSIONS

In cT1-3N2 lung cancer, multimodal treatments tended to provide better 5-year OS than OP alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In addition, lobectomy was associated with better survival than other operative methods.

Locoregional Control, Overall Survival, and Disease-Free Survival in Stage IIIA (N2) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Analysis of Resected and Unresected Patients

INTRODUCTION

The standard of care for stage IIIA (N2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes concurrent definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) followed by durvalumab, thus challenging the role of surgery in resectable patients. We assessed locoregional disease control and survival in patients with surgically resected and unresected stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis from prospectively collected databases at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery or dCRT for clinical stage IIIA (N2) disease (2004-2014) were evaluated. Primary outcomes included locoregional disease control, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier outcome analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 159 resected patients, the majority had lobectomy (82.4%), followed by pneumonectomy (11.9%) and sublobar resection (5.7%). The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0.6% and 1.3%, respectively. At median follow-up of 52.8 months, recurrence was 55.3%, with 44.0% having distant and 15.1% locoregional recurrence. At 5 years, OS was 50.8% and DFS was 33.1% Median OS was 61.2 months. A total of 366 patients underwent dCRT, with intensity-modulated radiation in 64.5%, proton therapy in 26.0%, and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in 9.6%. The mean dose was 68.1 Gy. At median follow-up of 20.8 months, recurrence was 53.6%, with distant and locoregional recurrence of 40.7% and 30.3%, respectively. At 5 years, OS was 29.2% and DFS was 20.5%. Median OS was 27.5 months.

CONCLUSION

Stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC continues to be a heterogeneous disease, and patients with surgically resected and unresected disease represent different risk populations. Ongoing immunotherapy trials may further redefine treatment algorithms in this complex patient population.

Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a very heterogeneous disease that encompasses patients with resected, potentially resectable and unresectable tumours. To improve the prognostic capacity of the TNM classification, it has been agreed to divide stage III into sub-stages IIIA, IIIB and IIIC that have very different 5-year survival rates (36, 26 and 13%, respectively). Currently, it is considered that both staging and optimal treatment of stage III NSCLC requires the joint work of a multidisciplinary team of expert physicians within the tumour committee. To improve the care of patients with stage III NSCLC, different scientific societies involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this disease have agreed to issue a series of recommendations that can contribute to homogenise the management of this disease, and ultimately to improve patient care.

Induction Therapies Plus Surgery Versus Exclusive Radiochemotherapy in Stage IIIA/N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

In spite of the growing body of data from prospective randomized clinical trials (PRCTs) and meta-analyses, the optimal treatment approach in patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer remains unknown. This review focuses on the available data directly confronting induction chemotherapy or induction radiochemotherapy (RT-CHT) when followed by surgery with exclusive RT-CHT. Seven PRCTs and 4 meta-analyses investigated this issue. In addition, numerous retrospective studies attempted to identify potential predictors and/or prognosticators that may have influenced the decision to offer surgery in a particular patient subgroup. Several retrospective studies also evaluated exclusive RT-CHT in this setting. There is not a single piece of the highest level of evidence (PRCT or MA) showing any advantage of induction therapies followed by surgery over exclusive RT-CHT with the former treatment option leading to significantly more morbidity and mortality. Although several studies attempted to identify patient subgroups favoring induction therapies followed by surgery, they have invariably been retrospective in nature, and their results have never been reproduced even in other retrospective setting. Furthermore, no PRCT investigated potential pretreatment patient and/or tumor-related predictors of surgical multimodality success. Exclusive RT-CHT achieves similar results to induction therapies followed by surgery but with less morbidity and mortality. This is accompanied with the finding that no pretreatment predictor exists to enable identification of even a subgroup of stage IIIA/pN2 patients benefiting from any surgical approach.

Risk and benefit of neoadjuvant therapy among patients undergoing resection for non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Neoadjuvant therapy has emerged as a favoured treatment paradigm for patients with clinical N2 disease undergoing surgical resection for non-small-cell lung cancer. It is unclear whether such a treatment paradigm affects perioperative outcomes. We sought to examine the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on perioperative outcomes and long-term survival in these patients.

METHODS

All patients with a history of non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing anatomical resection between 2004 and 2014 were included. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality of all patients having neoadjuvant therapy versus those who did not were compared. In addition, the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on the overall survival of patients with clinical N2 disease was examined.

RESULTS

Of the 134 428 selected patients, 9896 (7.4%) patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy had a higher 30-day (3% vs 2.6%; P < 0.01) and 90-day mortality (6.5% vs 4.9%; P < 0.01). This association remained after adjusting for covariates. Among patients with clinical N2 disease (n = 10 139), 42.3%, 35.3% and 22.4% of patients had neoadjuvant, adjuvant and no chemotherapy, respectively. Univariable, multivariable and propensity score-weighted analyses indicated no difference in survival between patients receiving neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant therapy may adversely affect perioperative outcomes without providing a survival advantage compared with adjuvant therapy in clinical N2 stage patients. Randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to examine this issue further.

Validity of the updated European Society of Thoracic Surgeons staging guideline in lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) has proposed a revised preoperative lymph node staging guideline for patients with potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to assess the validity of this revised ESTS guideline and survival results in our patient cohort.

METHODS

A total of 571 patients with potentially resectable NSCLC seen between January 2004 and November 2013 were included in the study. The preoperative mediastinal staging was performed by video-assisted cervical mediastinoscopy or video-assisted mediastinoscopic lymphadenectomy in all patients except those with peripheral cT1N0 nonadenocarcinoma tumors. Resection via thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was done in patients with no mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Surgical pathological results were compared with the ESTS staging guideline, and the validity of the guideline was tested.

RESULTS

In this series, mediastinal lymph node metastasis was revealed preoperatively in 266 patients (46.6%). A total of 305 patients underwent anatomic lung resection. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of the guidelines were calculated as 95.0%, 100%, 100%, 94.6%, and 97.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESTS revised preoperative lymph node staging guidelines for patients with NSCLC seem to be effective and valid, and may provide high survival following resectional surgery.