Does Repeated Lung Resection Provide Long-Term Survival for Recurrent Pulmonary Metastases of Colorectal Cancer? Results of a Retrospective Japanese Multicenter Study

Reoperative Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Outcomes and Indications

Recurrent pulmonary metastasis after initial pulmonary metastasectomy is common and poses a clinical dilemma. Reoperative pulmonary metastasectomy is an option that in select patients has been shown to be safe and technically feasible resulting in encouraging survival results from non-randomized retrospective studies. As with metastasectomy in general, there is ongoing debate if observed benefit of repeat pulmonary resection is a result of surgery or a reflection of selection bias. This review summarizes available evidence regarding reoperative pulmonary metastasectomy, discusses selection bias, and outlines future directions in the context of our evolving understanding of the oligometastatic state.

The Ugly: Metastatic Colon Cancer-Surgical Options

Over 50% of patients with colorectal cancer develop metastatic disease. Although systemic therapy remains the backbone of palliative treatment, select patients may be candidates for surgical resection with curative intent. Given increasing evidence of the association between metastasectomy and prolonged survival, surgery has acquired an increasingly central role in the management of liver, lung, and peritoneal metastases. This is compounded by accumulating advances in local and systemic treatments that have allowed for expansion of the resectability pool, bringing the potential for curative surgical treatment to increasing numbers of patients with stage IV disease. However, as the boundaries of resectability are pushed, patient selection and consideration of tumor-related and technical factors are imperative to the identification of patients for whom surgery would be of the greatest benefit.

A phase 2 study of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer (WJOG5810G)

BACKGROUND

The clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer remains unknown. This phase 2 study evaluated adjuvant chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) after lung metastasectomy.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included colorectal adenocarcinoma, first curative resection of ≤4 lung metastases, and no prior chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. The primary endpoint was the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, with the expectation of 50% (threshold, 35%) and a planned sample size of 100 (90% power; alpha error, 5%).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were enrolled between July 2011 and July 2014; patient enrollment was closed prematurely because of slow accrual. Excluding four ineligible patients, the characteristics of the 48 patients in the efficacy analysis set were a median age of 62 years (range, 43-75 years), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 in 45 patients, prior resection of extrathoracic metastasis in four patients, and postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen within normal range in 43 patients; the status of lung metastasis was single in 34 patients, unilateral in 40 patients, and metachronous in 41 patients; and a disease-free interval between primary tumor resection and diagnosis of lung metastasis of <2 years in 33 patients. The 5-year OS rate was 85.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.4%-92.6%), and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 60.2% (95% CI, 44.9%-72.4%). Forty-one of the 52 patients (78.8%) in the safety analysis set completed 12 cycles of mFOLFOX6. Grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (50.0%), fatigue (7.7%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (7.7%), and other (<5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6 is feasible, and may be effective after lung metastasectomy for colorectal cancer.

Incidence, treatment, and survival of patients with isolated colorectal lung metastases: A registry-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The benefit of surgical resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) lung metastases is unclear. The aim was to investigate the incidence, treatment strategy, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in CRC patients with isolated lung metastases.

METHODS

This registry-based retrospective cohort study included patients treated with curative resection of CRC within the county of Skåne during the period 2010-2016, who had synchrone or metachrone isolated lung metastases. Exclusion criteria were previous or concurrent metastases at other organ sites. Patients were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) and data were retrieved from SCRCR and medical charts. Patients were divided into groups based on whether they had synchronous or metachronous lung metastases and curative or palliative treatment intent. The primary endpoint was 5-year OS. Multivariable Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Of 8457 curatively resected CRC patients, 93 (1.1%) had isolated lung metastases (53 synchronous/40 metachronous). Of these, 53 were treated with curative intent, 51 (96%) of whom were managed surgically. The remaining 40 patients were treated palliatively and either with chemotherapy or with best supportive care. Five-year OS was 42% (39/93), median 50 months (IQR: 24-60) for the entire cohort, and 68% (36/53), median 60 months (IQR 55-60) and 7.5% (3/40), median 22 months (IQR: 12-33) for curative and palliative patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, age (hazard ratio (HR): 1.04, confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.07), multiple lung metastases (HR: 1.64, CI: 1.08-2.47), and unilateral distribution (HR: 0.41, CI: 0.20-0.84) were predictors of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated CRC lung metastases are rare. Curative treatment was associated with considerably better 5-year OS than palliative treatment (68% vs 8%). Age, solitary metastases, and unilateral distribution were predictors of survival.

Reply to Treasure et al. Comment on "Ambrogi et al. Lung Metastasectomy: Where Do We Stand? Results from an Italian Multicentric Prospective Database. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3106"

We would like to express our sincere gratitude for the thoughtful reflections on our recent study regarding pulmonary metastasectomy, and we greatly appreciate the constructive dialog that our work has sparked [...].

RAS mutant transverse colon cancer with multiple liver metastases achieving long-term disease-free survival with postoperative maintenance therapy with aflibercept + FOLFIRI and four repeated radical resections: a case report

BACKGROUND

Management of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) requires a multidisciplinary approach. For patients with progression of RAS mutant tumors, the choice of angiogenesis inhibitors can be controversial. Here, we report a patient with RAS mutant CRLMs achieving long-term disease-free survival with repeated R0 resections and perioperative treatment, especially aflibercept + FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, levofolinate, irinotecan), which may have prevented long-term recurrence.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient was a 37 year-old woman diagnosed with RAS mutant transverse colon cancer with 19 LMs. As the metastases were limited to the liver, we introduced systemic chemotherapy aiming at conversion surgery. After six cycles of bevacizumab + FOLFOXIRI (5-fluorouracil, levofolinate, oxaliplatin, irinotecan), we performed partial hepatectomy for all LMs, and left hemicolectomy for the primary tumor after another four cycles of bevacizumab + FOLFIRI. Three months after surgery, the patient presented with massive ovarian metastases with carcinomatous ascites. We conducted bilateral oophorectomy, and initiated aflibercept + FOLFIRI therapy considering the possibility of resistance to bevacizumab. The patient was recurrence-free for 2 years during aflibercept + FOLFIRI treatment. After its discontinuation, two distant metastases developed. Both were resectable and the patient achieved recurrence-free survival of 2 years and 3 months after the last operation (6 years since initiation of treatment), without additional chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

We believe that multidisciplinary treatment aimed at complete resection could lead to long-term survival even in patients with repeated recurrence of CRLMs. Aflibercept + FOLFIRI could be effective in controlling metastasis of RAS mutant colon cancer even after treatment with bevacizumab.

Factors associated with receipt of pulmonary metastasectomy in patients with lung-limited metastatic colorectal cancer: Disparities in care and impact on overall survival

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for colorectal cancer may provide respite from systemic therapy and prolonged disease-free intervals. We sought to identify factors associated with PM and to characterize the differential impact on overall survival for those offered lung resection.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for stage IV colorectal cancer patients with lung-limited metastatic disease between 2010 and 2016. Among patients who underwent primary tumor resection, those who underwent PM were compared with those who did not. Penalized regression with the least absolute selection and shrinkage operator was used to determine factors associated with receiving metastasectomy as well as overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 867 (15.1%) patients underwent resection of both primary tumor and pulmonary metastases whereas 4864 (84.8%) had primary tumor resection alone. In unadjusted analyses, metastasectomy patents were younger, more often privately insured, more educated, and traveled farther to receive care (all P < .001). In multivariable analyses, younger age, traveling >25 miles, and care at high-volume hospitals were associated with PM (P < .01). In addition, primary site surgery without PM was associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.35; confidence interval, 1.23-1.49), even after adjusting for patient, tumor, and hospital-related factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were older, who received care closer to home, and who were treated at low-volume hospitals were less likely to receive metastasectomy for lung-limited colorectal cancer after definitive resection of their primary tumor. Failure to receive PM resulted in worse overall survival, emphasizing the strong need for efforts to provide uniform, equitable care to all patients.

The Case for Pulmonary Metastasectomy-Clinical Practice Narrative Review and Commentary

Pulmonary metastasectomy has become a well-established procedure for patients with certain types of solid tumors. Patients are usually scheduled for staged lung metastasectomy in case of primary tumor control, the absence of distant non-lung metastases, and when complete resection is achievable. Nodules are removed with precision resection in order to ensure radical resection with minimal margins; this technique permits good oncological results, preserving the surrounding pulmonary parenchyma and causing minimal distortion compared to staplers. When possible, anatomical resections should be avoided since they are not justified by real oncological advantages and, in the majority of cases, sacrifice too much healthy tissue, possibly leading to inoperability in the case of metachronous relapses. Thus, preserving the maximum amount of pulmonary parenchyma is crucial because repeated metastasectomies are possible and frequent, with no theoretical limits to the number of reinterventions. In our multidisciplinary board team, we support the role of pulmonary metastasectomy as a useful curative therapy, with acceptable morbidity and mortality, with indications to be discussed case-by-case.

Outcomes and prognostic factors of repeat pulmonary metastasectomy

OBJECTIVES

Information on prognostic factors after repeat pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is limited, and outcomes after a third PM are not well documented.

METHODS

A single-institute retrospective study was conducted. Between 2000 and 2020, 68 patients underwent repeat PM for pulmonary metastases from various cancers. Outcomes and prognostic factors for the second PM and outcomes after the third PM were analysed.

RESULTS

This study included 39 men and 29 women. The mean age at second PM was 53.2 years old. The primary tumours were soft tissue sarcoma in 24 patients, colorectal cancer in 19 and osteosarcoma in 10. The interval between the first PM procedure and detection of pulmonary metastasis after the first PM (months) was ≤12 in 37 patients and >12 in 31 patients. At the second PM, 20 patients underwent lobectomy or bilobectomy, and 48 underwent sublobar resection. Complete resection was achieved in 60 patients, and 52 patients experienced recurrence after the second PM. The 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates after the second PM were 27% and 48%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that the interval between the first PM and the subsequent detection of pulmonary metastasis (≤12 months) was a poor prognostic factor for both relapse-free survival and overall survival after the second PM. Seventeen patients underwent a third PM, 3 of whom achieved a 3-year disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a period of >12 months between the first PM and the subsequent detection of pulmonary metastases showed favourable outcomes and are thus considered good candidates for second PM. A third PM may be beneficial for selected patients.

Local interventions for colorectal cancer metastases to liver and lung

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is a common cause of cancer-related deaths. About 1/3 of all cases present with distant metastasis, with the liver as the leading site and the lung as the most common extra-abdominal site.

AIMS

It was aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and the outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with liver or lung metastasis who had received local treatments.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, cross-sectional, and descriptive study. The study was performed with colorectal cancer patients that referred to the medical oncology clinic of a university hospital between December 2013 and August 2021.

RESULTS

A total number of 122 patients who have received local treatments were included. Radiofrequency ablation was applied in 32 patients (26.2%), metastasis was surgically resected in 84 patients (68.9%), and stereotactic body radiotherapy was preferred in six patients (4.9%). At the first follow-up control after completion of local or multimodal treatment, no residual tumor was determined with radiological assessment in 88 patients (72.1%). The median progression-free survival (16.7 months vs 9.7 months) (p = .000) and the median overall survival (37.3 months vs 25.5 months) (p = .004) of these patients were significantly better than the patients with residual disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Local interventions that are applied to highly selected patients may improve the survival of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. A close follow-up after local therapies is important to diagnose recurrent disease because repeated local interventions may be possible to achieve better outcomes.

Pulmonary metastasectomy and repeat metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: outcomes from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of recurrent pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal cancer is an established treatment option; however, the evidence for repeat resection is limited. The aim of this study was to analyse long-term outcomes from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery.

METHODS

Data from the mandatory Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery were used to analyse all patients after metastasectomy or repeat metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases from January 2012 to December 2019 in the Netherlands. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine the difference in survival. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1237 patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 127 patients underwent repeat metastasectomy. Five-year overall survival was 53 per cent after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases and 52 per cent after repeat metastasectomy (P = 0.852). The median follow-up was 42 (range 0-285) months. More patients experienced postoperative complications after repeat metastasectomy compared with the first metastasectomy (18.1 per cent versus 11.6 per cent respectively; P = 0.033). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status greater than or equal to 1 (HR 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.08 to 1.65; P = 0.008), multiple metastases (HR 1.30, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.67; P = 0.038), and bilateral metastases (HR 1.50, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 2.22; P = 0.045) were prognostic factors on multivariable analysis for pulmonary metastasectomy. Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide less than 80 per cent (HR 1.04, 95 per cent c.i. 1.01 to 1.06; P = 0.004) was the only prognostic factor on multivariable analysis for repeat metastasectomy.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that patients with colorectal pulmonary metastases have comparable median and 5-year overall survival rates after primary or recurrent pulmonary metastasectomy. However, repeat metastasectomy has a higher risk of postoperative complications.

Repeated Pulmonary Metastasectomy: Third Operations and Beyond

BACKGROUND

For extrathoracic malignant neoplasms that have metastasized to the lungs, previous investigations have demonstrated both oncologic and survival benefits after pulmonary and repeated metastasectomy. Little is known about the feasibility of incrementally increasing numbers of subsequent metastasectomy procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent ≥3 pulmonary resection procedures for recurrent, metachronous metastatic disease of nonlung primary malignant neoplasms at a single institution between 1992 and 2020. Primary outcomes collected pertained to safety and feasibility, including estimated blood loss (EBL), hospital length of stay, and details of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There were 117 patients who met inclusion criteria, having undergone at least 3 metastasectomy operations, with 55 (47.1%) undergoing a fourth operation and 20 (17.1%) undergoing a fifth operation. EBL did not differ between first and second operations (106.6 mL vs 102.5 mL; P = .76). It was, however, significantly greater at third operations (102.5 mL vs 238.7 mL; P = .000016). We noted an increase in wound complications between the second and third operations (0.9% vs 6.8%; P = .02) and incremental increases in likelihood of prolonged air leak with each subsequent operation. The need for reoperation was low for all and similar between operations. Importantly, hospital length of stay was similar for all procedures, as were the frequencies of hospital readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Third-time redo pulmonary metastasectomy can be performed safely and feasibly in select patients. Further repeated resection should remain a therapeutic option for patients, although risks for potentially longer operating time, greater EBL, and prolonged air leaks may be anticipated.

Homogeneous and heterogeneous risk and prognostic factors for lung metastasis in colorectal cancer patients

Background

The lung is one of the most frequent distant metastasis sites in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients; however, lung metastasis risk and prognostic factors have not been comprehensively elucidated. This study aimed to identify the homogeneous and heterogeneous lung metastasis risk and prognostic factors in CRC patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

CRC patients registered in the SEER database between 2010 and 2016 were included to analyse risk factors for developing lung metastasis by using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were selected to investigate prognostic factors for lung metastasis by conducting Cox regression. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival outcomes.

Results

A total of 10,598 (5.2%) patients with synchronous lung metastasis were diagnosed among 203,138 patients with CRC. The median survival time of patients with lung metastasis was 10.0 months (95% CI 9.6–10.5 months). Older age, unmarried status, uninsured status, poor histological differentiation, more lymphatic metastasis, CEA positivity, liver metastasis, bone metastasis and brain metastasis were lung metastasis risk and prognostic factors. Black patients and those with left colon, rectum, and stage T4 disease were more likely to develop lung metastasis, while patients with right colon cancer and no surgical treatment of the primary tumour had poor survival outcomes.

Conclusion

The incidence of lung metastasis in CRC patients was 5.2%. CRC patients with lung metastasis exhibited homogeneous and heterogeneous risk and prognostic factors. These results are helpful for clinical evaluation and individual treatment decision making.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02270-5.

Tumor-suppressive role of Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor 2 in patients with colorectal cancer

Smad ubiquitination regulatory factor 2 (Smurf2) plays various roles in cancer progression. However, the correlation between Smurf2 and clinical outcomes has not been determined in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases. We analyzed 66 patients with colorectal cancer who developed liver metastases. Smurf2 expression was assessed using immunohistochemical analysis of primary and metastatic liver tumors. High Smurf2 expression in both primary and metastatic tumors was significantly associated with longer overall survival time and time to surgical failure. Multivariate analyses revealed that low Smurf2 expression in primary tumors was an independent predictor of poor prognosis. In vitro experiments using colon cancer cell lines demonstrated that short interfering RNA knockdown of Smurf2 increased cell migration and tumor sphere formation. Western blot analyses revealed that Smurf2 knockdown increased the protein expression of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). Thus, in summary, high Smurf2 expression in cancer cells was found to be an independent predictor of better prognosis in patients with primary colorectal cancer and consequent liver metastases. The tumor-suppressive role of Smurf2 was found to be associated with cell migration and EpCAM expression; hence, Smurf2 can be considered a positive biomarker of cancer stem cell-like properties.

Anatomical Resection Improves Disease-Free Survival After Lung Metastasectomy of Colorectal Cancer

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the role of anatomical resection (AR) in lung metastasectomy (LM) of colorectal cancer (CRC) and to investigate clinically relevant prognostic factors.

Patients and Methods

The medical records of 350 consecutive patients who underwent LM of CRC from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed. The patients were designated into AR group (lobectomy and segmentectomy), and non-anatomical resection (NAR) group (wedge resection), respectively. Kaplan–Meier method was used to analyze disease-free survival (DFS), pulmonary-specific disease-free survival (PDFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed to analyze the factors associated with DFS, PDFS and OS.

Results

A total of 92 (31.2%) patients were enrolled in AR group and 203 (68.8%) in non-anatomical resection (NAR) group. AR significantly improved the 3-year DFS (64.1% vs 46.8%, HR 0.587, 95% CI 0.397–0.867, P = 0.007) and PDFS (75.0% vs 60.1%, HR 0.565, 95% CI 0.356–0.899, P = 0.016) compared with NAR. However, the extent of resection did not significantly impact the 3-year OS (AR 92.4% vs NAR 85.7%, HR 0.511, 95% CI 0.224–1.165, P = 0.110). In multivariate analysis, AR was identified as a protective factor for DFS (HR 0.576, 95% CI 0.356–0.934, P = 0.025) and PDFS (HR 0.631, 95% CI 0.409–0.973, P = 0.037). Preoperative abnormal CA19-9 was identified as the only prognostic factor for OS.

Conclusion

AR was superior to NAR for DFS and PDFS after LM from CRC.

Role of surgical resection and its alternative local therapy for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer

We reviewed surgical and alternative treatments for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer, focusing on recent reports. The standard treatment for pulmonary metastasis of colorectal cancer is pulmonary resection, if resectable, despite the fact that the metastasis is hematogenous to distant organs. Guidelines in several countries, including Japan, have described pulmonary resection as a useful option because of the favorable long-term prognosis reported in various studies pertaining to pulmonary resection. The indications for pulmonary resection have been reviewed in several studies; additionally, the number of metastases, pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen value, and disease-free interval from the primary resection to pulmonary recurrence have been proposed. However, no consensus has been reached to date. Contrastingly, recent advances in chemotherapy have remarkably improved the outcome of distant metastases, indicating that it is time to reconsider the significance of local treatment, including pulmonary resection. In addition to surgical resection, minimally invasive therapies, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation have been developed as local treatments for pulmonary metastases, and their long-term results have been reported. Prospective controlled trials and large-scale data analyses are needed to determine the best local treatment for pulmonary metastases and to find the appropriate indication for each treatment.

Outcome of Repeat Pulmonary Metastasectomy

Pulmonary metastasectomy is a well-established contribution to the cure of oligometastatic cancers, but its exact effectiveness is poorly understood. Here we report the outcomes of repeat pulmonary metastasectomy from a multicenter trial. This retrospective study included patients who underwent re-do metastasectomies between January 2010 and December 2014. The exclusion criterion was metastasectomy without curative intent. We reviewed medical files of 621 consecutive patients who underwent initial pulmonary metastasectomy. Of those, 64 patients underwent repeat metastasectomies, and these patients were included in the analysis. All the 64 patients underwent a second metastasectomy, later 35 of them underwent a third metastasectomy, 12 underwent a fourth metastasectomy, and 6 underwent a fifth metastasectomy. The total number of re-do metastasectomies was 181. The median overall survival among the patients undergoing re-do metastasectomy was 66.0 ± 3.8 months. Three and 5-year survival rates were 82.3% and 63.3%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates were 63.3% after the first, 50.9% after the second, 74.4% after the third, 83.3% after the fourth, and 60.0% after the fifth metastasectomy. We conclude that at the current stage of knowledge, there is an indication for repeat re-do metastasectomy with curative intent.

Results of redo pulmonary metastasectomy

Repeat surgical resection (redo) for pulmonary metastases is a questionable, albeit intriguing topic. We performed an extensive review of the literature, to specifically analyze results of redo pulmonary metastasectomies. We reviewed a total of 3,523 papers. Among these, 2,019 were excluded for redundancy and 1,105 because they were not completely retrievable. Out of 399 eligible papers, 183 had missing information or missing abstract, while 96 lacked data on survival. A total of 120 papers dated from 1991 onwards were finally included. Data regarding mortality, major morbidity, prognostic factors and long-term survivals of the first redo pulmonary metastasectomies were retrieved and analyzed. Homogeneity of data was affected by the lack of guidelines for redo pulmonary metastasectomy and the risks of bias when comparing different studies has to be considered. According to the histology sub-types, redo metastasectomies papers were grouped as: colorectal (n=42), sarcomas (n=36), others (n=20) and all histologies (n=22); the total number of patients was 3,015. Data about chemotherapy were reported in half of the papers, whereas targeted or immunotherapy in 9. None of these associated therapies, except chemotherapy in two records, did significantly modify outcomes. Disease-free interval before the redo procedure was the prevailing prognostic factor and nearly all papers showed a significant correlation between patients’ comorbidities and prognosis. No perioperative mortality was reported, while perioperative major morbidity was overall quite low. Where available, overall survival after the first redo metastasectomy ranged from 10 to 72 months, with a 5-years survival of approximately 50%. The site of first recurrence after the redo procedure was mainly lung. Despite the data retrievable from literature are heterogeneous and confounding, we can state that redo lung metastasectomy is worthwhile when the lesions are resectable and the perioperative risk is low. At present, there are no “non-surgical” therapeutic options to replace redo pulmonary metastasectomies.

Prognostic value of KRAS mutation in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether KRAS mutation could be an independent prognostic biomarker in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

A systemic review was performed by searching online databases to identify studies reporting overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) of CRC patients undergoing PM. Pooled HRs were calculated for OS and RFS.

RESULTS

A total of 15233 patients from 60 studies were included. Pooled analysis showed that KRAS mutation was associated with worse OS (HR: 1.86, 95 % Cl: 1.35-2.57) and RFS (HR: 1.68, 95 % Cl: 1.38-2.04). A significant effect on OS and/or RFS was also shown by other 18 factors.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found that KRAS mutation is an important prognostic predictor for OS and RFS in CRC patients undergoing PM, supporting a comprehensive model including clinicopathological and biological factors for optimal patients selection and prognosis for surgical treatment.

Past, present, and future perspectives of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Over a half-century has passed since Thomford et al. proposed the selection criteria for pulmonary metastasectomy, and several prognostic factors have been identified. Although screening modalities and operations have changed dramatically, the important concepts of the selection criteria remain unchanged. Recent improvements in the survival outcomes of colorectal cancer patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy may be the result of strict adherence to the selection criteria for oligometastatic lung tumors, which can mimic local disease. Pulmonary metastasectomy has become an important option for selected patients with oligometastasis, based mainly on a large amount of retrospective data, but its effect on survival remains unclear. Curable pulmonary metastasis might be regarded as a "semi-local disease" under the spontaneous control of an acquired alteration in host immune status. The current practice of pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer focuses on selecting the most appropriate operation for selected patients. However, in the rapidly evolving era of immunotherapy, treatment-naïve patients for whom surgery is not suitable might be pre-conditioned by immunotherapy so that they may be considered for salvage surgery.

Prognosis of patients with recurrence after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the prognosis of patients with recurrence of pulmonary metastases (PM) from colorectal cancer (CRC) after resection.

METHODS

We reviewed our surgical series of 101 CRC patients with PM who underwent R0 resection with curative intent. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates after metastasectomy as well as the prognostic factors of survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (54%) experienced recurrence, of whom 21 had developed extrapulmonary metastasis (EPM) before lung resection. Multivariate analysis restricted to patients with recurrence identified a disease-free interval (DFI) shorter than a year as an adverse prognosticator of OS (HR, 2.68; 95% CI 1.40-5.51; P < 0.01) and DFS (HR, 8.54; 95% CI 3.0-24.6; P < 0.001). EPM was also identified as an adverse prognosticator of OS for patients with recurrence (HR, 3.16; 95% CI 1.64-5.88; P < 0.001). There was a significant difference in the 5-year OS rate between patients with and without EPM (27.9% vs 64.9%, P < 0.001), and between those with a DFI shorter and longer than a year (40.0% vs 75.0%, P < 0.01). Among these, 31 patients (56%) bore lung-limited recurrence after their first lung resection, of whom 20 (36%) underwent a total of 29 repeat pulmonary metastasectomies, which resulted in a 5-year OS rate of 71.3% after the second lung resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that CRC patients with PM whose DFI is shorter than a year after lung resection or those with prior EPM more frequently experience multisite recurrence.

Benefits of repeated resections for liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate oncological outcomes after repeat metastasectomies in patients having undergone previous resections for colorectal cancer metastases.

METHODS

We examined 248 patients who underwent metastasectomies for lung and/or liver metastases at our center during a 7-year period, from January 2005 to December 2011. Recurrence-free survival 1 (RFS1) after the metastasectomy for the initial recurrence, recurrence-free survival 2 (RFS2) after the second, and recurrence-free survival 3 (RFS3) after the third repeated resections for recurrence were assessed. The overall survival (OS) rate after the first metastasectomy for the first recurrence (OS) was also assessed.

RESULTS

Sites of recurrence of the first metastasectomy were the liver, lung, and liver and lung in 115, 117, and 16 cases, respectively, and 133 patients had a second recurrence (133/248, 53.6%). Twenty-seven patients had a third recurrence (27/52, 51.9%), of whom 14 underwent a third metastasectomy. The 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 74.8% and 57.9%, respectively. The 1-year RFS1, RFS2, and RFS3 rates were 76%, 75%, and 39%, respectively. The hazard ratios for RFS were 1.142 and 2.590 for the first and second repeat surgeries, when compared to the first metastasectomy. The third metastasectomy showed significantly lower RFS than did the second metastasectomy.

CONCLUSION

A second metastasectomy should be considered the optimal treatment for a second recurrence. However, careful considerations should be made before performing a third metastasectomy.

Is metastasectomy a worthy option?-the role of surgery in metastatic colon cancer to liver and lungs

Background

The role of surgery and metastasectomy is controversial in the treatment of stage IV colon cancer (CC). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between primary tumor resection (PTR) with metastasectomy and survival in patients diagnosed with metastatic CC.

Methods

The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was retrospectively queried for patients diagnosed with colon adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2013. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and short-term outcomes were collected. Groups were generated based on if surgery was performed and, if so, was metastasectomy involved. Associations between groups were evaluated using Kruskal-Wallis and Pearson Chi-square tests. Overall survival (OS) was summarized using standard Kaplan-Meier methods. The association between surgical group and OS was evaluated using the log-rank test.

Results

Of 31,172 patients, 13,214 (42.4%) had surgery while 17,958 (57.6%) did not. Among these, 81.3% of patients had liver metastases only, while 18.7% of patients had both liver and lung metastases. Median OS was 15.1 months (95% CI: 14.8 to 15.5 months) for the entire cohort. However, median OS was significantly better for those who had surgery (either PTR alone or PTR with metastasectomy) compared to those who did not (21.8 vs. 7.5 months, P<0.001). Patients who received PTR with metastasectomy had worse median OS (20.5 vs. 21.8 months, P=0.035) compared to those who only received PTR (P=0.211).

Conclusions

PTR in select patients diagnosed with metastatic CC provides a remarkable improvement to survival rate. The role of metastasectomy remains controversial as no difference in survival outcomes exists between patients who received it and who did not.

Role of Repeat Resection in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about repeat resection for recurrence exclusive of the liver and lungs and the natural history after the first curative resection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the role of repeat resection for recurrence of metastatic colorectal cancer in a Japanese cohort.

DESIGN

This is a multi-institution retrospective observational study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at participating tertiary referral hospitals.

PATIENTS

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had synchronous distant metastases and underwent simultaneous resection of primary and distant disease or sequential staged resection at short intervals between 1997 and 2007 were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were patterns of recurrence site, treatments, and survival.

RESULTS

A total of 1133 patients were identified, of whom 1073 were eligible. In total, 809 of the 1073 patients developed recurrence after curative resection, and 323 of these underwent repeat resection for recurrence. Of these, 211 developed re-recurrence; 80 of these patients underwent a second repeat resection. When stratified by site of recurrence, the 5-year overall survival rate in patients who underwent repeat resection was 56% in those with recurrence in the liver only, 43% in those with recurrence in the lung only, 30% in those with peritoneal seeding only, and 28% in those with multiple organ involvement. In patients who underwent a second repeat resection, the 5-year overall survival rates were 56%, 46%, 100%, and 50%.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by its retrospective study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat surgery could have long-term survival benefit in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who develop recurrence or re-recurrence in the liver or lung following curative resection. However, repeat surgery should be considered carefully in patients with peritoneal seeding only or recurrence at multiple sites. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A838.

Complete biochemical response after pulmonary metastasectomy in prostate adenocarcinoma

Background

Prostate cancer most commonly metastasizes to bones or lymph nodes, and metastatic prostate cancer is suggestive of disseminated disease. Metastatic disease is usually not amenable to surgery.

Case presentation

The current report presents a unique case of in which the excision of a solitary pulmonary metastasis resulted in undetectable prostate-specific antigen.

Conclusion

This case and others suggest metastasectomy could be considered in cases with solitary metastasis, and physicians should have a careful discussion regarding risks and possible benefits from surgical excision.