Previous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Does Not Increase Adverse Events After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Late Myocardial Infarction and Repeat Revascularization after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Prior Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the risk of late mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A total of 2948 patients undergoing isolated CABGs were included in a prospective multicenter registry. Outcomes were adjusted for multiple covariates in logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards analysis and competing risk analysis. Results: In all, 2619 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria of this analysis. Of them, 2199 (79.1%) had no history of PCI and 420 (20.9%) had a prior PCI. An adjusted analysis showed that a single prior PCI and multiple prior PCIs did not increase the risk of 30-day and 5-year mortality. Patients with multiple prior PCIs had a significantly higher risk of 5-year myocardial infarction (SHR 2.566, 95%CI 1.379–4.312) and repeat revascularization (SHR 1.774, 95%CI 1.140–2.763). Similarly, 30-day and 5-year mortality were not significantly increased in patients with prior PCI treatment of single or multiple vessels. Patients with multiple vessels treated with PCI had a significantly higher risk of 5-year myocardial infarction (SHR 2.640, 95%CI 1.497–4.658), repeat revascularization (SHR 1.648, 95%CI 1.029–2.638) and stroke (SHR 2.215, 95%CI 1.056–4.646) at 5-year. The risk for repeat revascularization was also increased with a prior single vessel PCI, but not for other outcomes. Conclusions: Among patients undergoing CABGs, multiple prior PCIs seem to increase the risk of late myocardial infarction and the need for repeat revascularization, but not the risk of mortality.

Prior percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of 308,284 patients

Background:

The association between prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and prognosis after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate the aforementioned association in a meta-analysis.

Methods:

PubMed, Cochrane’s Library, and Embase databases were searched for potential studies. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the influence of study characteristics on the outcomes.

Results:

Thirty-six follow-up studies with 308,284 patients were included, and 40,892 (13.3%) patients had prior PCI. Pooled results showed that prior PCI was associated with higher risks of early (in-hospital or within 1 month) all-cause mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11–1.44, p = 0.003; I² = 64%] and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.12–1.66, p = 0.002, I² = 79%), but not with late (follow-up durations from 1 to 13 years) mortality (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.95–1.13, p = 0.44, I² = 46%) or MACEs (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97–1.09, p = 0.38, I² = 0%). Meta-regression showed that the study characteristics of patient number, age, sex, diabetic status, and proportion of patients with prior PCI did not affect the outcomes. Sensitivity analyses limited to multivariate studies excluding patients with acute PCI failure showed similar results (early mortality, OR: 1.25, p = 0.003; early MACE, OR: 1.50, p = 0.001; late mortality, OR: 1.03, p = 0.70).

Conclusion:

The current evidence, mostly from retrospective observational studies, suggests that prior PCI is related to poor early clinical outcomes, but not to late clinical outcomes, after CABG.

Multiple percutaneous coronary interventions may negatively impact cardiac remodelling after bypass surgery

OBJECTIVES

Many patients undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) multiple times before being referred for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), in which bypass grafts are often anastomosed to small distal targets with higher risk of graft failure. We aimed to assess whether multiple PCIs adversely affect the long-term outcomes of patients who undergo CABG subsequently.

METHODS

A cohort of 368 patients with no history of PCI underwent initial isolated CABG between 2003 and 2013 (no PCI group). Ninety-seven patients who had undergone PCI 2 or more times preoperatively during the same period constituted the multiple PCI group. After propensity score matching, the group outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the 10-year all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event rates in both groups. Although the left ventricular end-diastolic dimension in the multiple PCI group did not change markedly (from 48.0 ± 6.0 to 47.2 ± 7.9 mm; P = 0.25), it decreased significantly in the no PCI group (from 48.3 ± 6.1 to 44.9 ± 9.1 mm; P < 0.001). The left ventricular end-systolic dimension in the no PCI group decreased significantly (from 34.1 ± 8.7 to 31.4 ± 8.6 mm; P = 0.024), while it in the multiple PCI group did not (from 33.6 ± 8.3 to 32.7 ± 8.6 mm; P = 0.21).

CONCLUSIONS

For complex coronary artery disease, early surgical intervention could be considered with respect to postoperative left ventricular remodelling during the long-term follow-up.

Effect of previous coronary stenting on subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The effect of previous coronary stenting on subsequent coronary artery bypass graft is inconclusive.

METHODS

We used Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database to retrospectively evaluate patients with multivessel coronary artery bypass graft between January 2000 and December 2013. Overall, 32,335 patients who received coronary artery bypass graft were included, of whom 3028 had previous coronary stenting. Propensity-score matching yielded 2977 cases each for evaluation under the previous stenting and no stenting groups. The 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiac events, including all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, and revascularization, were considered primary outcomes.

RESULTS

The number of coronary artery bypass grafts decreased per year. However, the percentage of patients who had previous coronary stent implantation before coronary artery bypass graft increased steadily (P for trend <.001), and the average number of stents implanted in a patient also increased per year (P for trend <.001). The previous stent group had a significantly greater 30-day mortality rate than did the no-stent group (7.2% vs 5.0%; odds ratio, 1.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.82). The previous stent group had a greater rate of revascularization (14.4% and 10.0%; subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-1.74) in the last follow-up at year 13.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous coronary stenting before coronary artery bypass graft for multivessel coronary artery disease significantly increased 30-day mortality but did not affect late survival. However, patients who had coronary stenting before coronary artery bypass graft experienced more revascularization events during late follow-up.

Prior Percutaneous Coronary Interventions May Be Associated With Increased Mortality After Coronary Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis

There is conflicting evidence for adverse outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) with prior percutaneous intervention (PCI). A literature search was performed from 1998 to 2017 and articles with primary or secondary outcomes of survival, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and myocardial infarction in CABG patients with prior PCI were included. Forest plots were generated from odds ratios for survival, MACE, and myocardial infarction for unmatched and propensity-matched data. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed for all outcomes using I². Funnel plots were generated for early survival, survival at 5 years, survival at >5 years, and MACE. Thirty-one studies were included over 18 years with 194,544 patients without PCI prior to CABG and 23,519 patients (12.09%) with prior PCI. Prior PCI did not adversely affect survival among the included studies (inverse rate ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 0.98-1.27, P = 0.110. MACE was significantly worse for those with prior PCI (odds ratio: 1.26, confidence interval: 1.02-1.55, P = 0.03). The relative risk of mortality associated with prior PCI has decreased significantly over the last 2 decades. Studies with higher percentage of prior PCI patients had higher relative mortalities. There was significant heterogeneity between studies for the treatment effects. PCI prior to CABG in recent times does not adversely affect survival despite adverse early and late MACE rates. However, high institutional rates of prior PCI may be associated with increasing mortality after CABG.

Does prior coronary angioplasty affect outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization? Insights from the STICH trial

BACKGROUND

The STICH trial showed superiority of coronary artery bypass plus medical treatment (CABG) over medical treatment alone (MED) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. In previous publications, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to CABG was associated with worse prognosis.

OBJECTIVES

The main purpose of this study was to analyse if prior PCI influenced outcomes in STICH.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients in the STICH trial (n = 1212), followed for a median time of 9.8 years, were included in the present analyses. In the total population, 156 had a prior PCI (74 and 82, respectively, in the MED and CABG groups). In those with vs. without prior PCI, the adjusted hazard-ratios (aHRs) were 0.92 (95% CI = 0.74-1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.85 (95% CI = 0.64-1.11) for CV mortality, and 1.43 (95% CI = 1.15-1.77) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG without prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70-0.95) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (95% CI = 0.62-0.90) for CV mortality and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56-0.80) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG with prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.50-1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.49-1.36) for CV mortality and 0.61 (95% CI = 0.41-0.90) for CV hospitalization. There was no evidence of interaction between randomized treatment and prior PCI for any endpoint (all adjusted p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the STICH trial, prior PCI did not affect the outcomes of patients whether they were treated medically or surgically, and the superiority of CABG over MED remained unchanged regardless of prior PCI.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT00023595.

Main predictors of in-hospital adverse outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients with multivessel disease

Aim. To evaluate the range of risk factors associated with adverse cardiovascular events onset in hospital period of follow-up in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) with multivessel disease (MD).

Material and methods. To the study, under the framework of prospective, single-center registry, the NSTEACS and MD patients were included. Depending on the strategy of revascularization, three groups were selected: staged PCI, coronary bypass (CBG) and PCI as the first with CBG as the second stage. As adverse cardiovascular events, the following were taken: death, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient cerebral ishemia, clinically significant bleeding by BARC, repeat nonscheduled revascularization of target vessel. 

Results. Analysis revealed the groups of factors increasing the probability of adverse cardiovascular events. Those are: (1) clinical and demographic  — older age, diabetes, postinfarction cardiosclerosis, multifocal atherosclerosis, chronic renal failure; (2) coronary and surgical — left main stem lesion, severe atherosclerosis by SYNTAX Score, high surgical risk by EuroScore II, revascularization strategy;  (3) predominance of low or moderate risk by GRACE comparing with high risk.

Conclusion. The results have confirmed high predictional significance of clinical and demography and coronary factors for development of adverse cardiovascular diseases. A significant finding of the study was the fact that in a hospital with surgery and endovascular treatment available 24/7, the intermediate and low GRACE risk in NSTEACS and MD is a factor of adverse cardiovascular events development due to revascularization delays if the risk is not high.