International Participation in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: From Institutional to National

Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: A Joint Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Cardiac Society, ERAS International Society, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs have been shown to lessen surgical insult, promote recovery, and improve postoperative clinical outcomes across a number of specialty operations. A core tenet of ERAS involves the provision of protocolized evidence-based perioperative interventions. Given both the growing enthusiasm for applying ERAS principles to cardiac surgery and the broad scope of relevant interventions, an international, multidisciplinary expert panel was assembled to derive a list of potential program elements, review the literature, and provide a statement regarding clinical practice for each topic area. This article summarizes those consensus statements and their accompanying evidence. These results provide the foundation for best practice for the management of the adult patient undergoing cardiac surgery.

Validation of the society of thoracic surgeons predicted risk of mortality score for long-term survival after cardiac surgery in Israel

Background

Long-term survival is an important metric in assessing procedural value. We previously confirmed that the Society of Thoracic Surgeons predicted risk of mortality score (PROM) accurately predicts 30-day mortality in Israeli patients. The present study investigated the ability of the PROM to reliably predict long-term survival.

Methods

Data on 1279 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were prospectively entered into our database and used to calculate PROM. Long-term mortality was obtained from the Israeli Social Security Database. Patients were stratified into five cohorts according to PROM (A: 0–0.99%, B: 1.0–1.99%, C: 2.0–2.99%, D: 3.0–4.99% and E: ≥ 5.0%). Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival were calculated for each cohort and compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. We used C-statistics to assess model discrimination. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of long-term survival.

Results

Follow-up was achieved for 1256 (98%) patients over a mean period of 62 ± 28 months (median 64, range 0–107). Mean survival of the entire cohort was 95 ± 1 (95% CI 93–96) months. Higher PROM was associated with reduced survival: A—104 ± 1 (103–105) months, B—96 ± 2 (93–99) months, C—93 ± 3 (88–98) months, D—89 ± 3 (84–94) months, E—74 ± 3 (68–80) months (p < 0.0001). The Area Under the Curve was 0.76 ± 0.02 indicating excellent model discrimination. Independent predictors of long-term mortality included advanced age, lower ejection fraction, reoperation, diabetes mellitus, dialysis and PROM.

Conclusions

The PROM was a reliable predictor of long-term survival in Israeli patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The PROM might be a useful metric for assessing procedural value and surgical decision-making.