Blood Stasis on Transcatheter Valve Leaflets and Implications for Valve-in-Valve Leaflet Thrombosis

Adaptation of Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves for Pulmonary Position: Comparative Analysis of Transcatheter and Surgical Valves

Pulmonary valve dysfunction is common in congenital heart disease, often leading to interventions like right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has emerged as a successful alternative to surgery, showcasing promising outcomes for managing postoperative RVOT complications. The study aimed to compare two bioprosthetic valves-Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease surgical valve and Edwards SAPIEN 3 transcatheter valve-originally designed for aortic use but adapted for pulmonary applications. The hemodynamic characteristics of a 26-mm SAPIEN 3 and a 25-mm Magna Ease were assessed in a pulse duplicator under both pulmonary and aortic conditions. Furthermore, detailed structural analyses of the leaflets were conducted using computational simulations under these conditions. The results highlighted significant differences in the hydrodynamic and structural characteristics of these two bioprosthetic valves when exposed to pulmonary versus aortic conditions. The study enhances our understanding of the biomechanics involved in surgical and transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement.

Laser ablation for preventing coronary obstruction and maintaining coronary access in redo-TAVR: A proof of concept

BACKGROUND

Redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a promising treatment for transcatheter aortic valve degeneration, becoming increasingly relevant with an aging population. In redo-TAVR, the leaflets of the initial (index) transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) are displaced vertically when the second TAV is implanted, creating a cylindrical cage that can impair coronary cannulation and flow. Preventing coronary obstruction and maintaining coronary access is essential, especially in young and low-risk patients undergoing TAVR. This study aimed to develop a new leaflet modification strategy using laser ablation to prevent coronary obstruction and facilitate coronary access after repeat TAVR.

METHODS

To evaluate the feasibility of the leaflet modification technique using laser ablation, the initial phase of this study involved applying a medical-grade ultraviolet laser for ablation through pericardial tissue. Following this intervention, computational fluid dynamics simulations were utilized to assess the efficacy of the resulting perforations in promoting coronary flow. These simulations played a crucial role in understanding the impact of the modifications on blood flow patterns, ensuring these changes would facilitate the restoration of coronary circulation.

RESULTS

Laser ablation of pericardium leaflets was successful, demonstrating the feasibility of creating openings in the TAV leaflets. Flow simulation results show that ablation of index valve leaflets can effectively mitigate the flow obstruction caused by sinus sequestration in redo-TAVR, with the extent of restoration dependent on the number and location of the ablated openings.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser ablation could be a viable method for leaflet modification in redo-TAVR, serving as a new tool in interventional procedures.

Single-Center Experience with the Balloon-Expandable Myval Transcatheter Aortic Valve System in Patients with Bicuspid Anatomy: Procedural and 30-Day Follow-Up

Aims: To report our single-center data regarding the initial 52 consecutive patients with a bicuspid aortic valve who underwent a Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) procedure using the new balloon-expandable MYVAL system. The focus is on reporting procedural details and outcomes over the 30-day postoperative period. Methods: From December 2019 to July 2023, 52 consecutive patients underwent a TAVI procedure with bicuspid anatomy. All patients had moderate to-high surgical risk or were unsuitable for surgical aortic valve replacement based on the Heart Team's decision. Outcomes were analyzed according to the VARC-2 criteria. The results of bicuspid patients were compared to patients with tricuspid anatomy in the overall study group, and further analysis involved a comparison between 52 pairs after propensity score matching. The device performance was evaluated using transthoracic echocardiography. Data collection was allowed by the Local Ethical Committee. Results: The mean age was 71 ± 7.1 years, and 65.4% were male. The mean Euroscore II and STS score were 3.3 ± 3.2 and 5.2 ± 3.3, respectively. Baseline characteristics and echocardiographic parameters were well balanced even in the unmatched comparison. Procedures were significantly longer in the bicuspid group and resulted in a significantly higher ARI index. All relevant anatomic dimensions based on the CT scans were significantly higher in bicuspid anatomy, including a higher implantation angulation, a higher rate of horizontal aorta and a higher proportion of patients with aortopathy. In the unmatched bicuspid vs. tricuspid comparison, postprocedural outcomes were as follows: in-hospital mortality 0% vs. 1.4% (p = 0.394), device success 100% vs. 99.1% (p = 0.487), TIA 1.9% vs. 0% (p = 0.041), stroke 1.9% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.537), major vascular complication 3.8% vs. 2.3% (p = 0.530), permanent pacemaker implantation 34% vs. 30.4% (p = 0.429), and cardiac tamponade 0% vs. 0.5% (p = 0.624). In the propensity-matched bicuspid vs. tricuspid comparison, postprocedural outcomes were as follows: in-hospital mortality 0% vs. 0%, device success 100% vs. 100%, TIA 1.9% vs. 0% (p = 0.315), stroke 1.9% vs. 0.9% (p = 0.315), major vascular complication 3.8% vs. 0% (p = 0.475), permanent pacemaker implantation 34% vs. 24% (p = 0.274), and cardiac tamponade 0% vs. 0%. There was no annular rupture nor need for second valve or severe aortic regurgitation in both the unmatched and matched comparison. The peak and mean aortic gradients did not differ at discharge and at 30-day follow-up between the two groups regardless of whether the comparison was unmatched or matched. There were no paravalvular leakages (moderate or above) in the bicuspid patients. Intermediate and extra sizes of the Myval THV system used a significantly higher proportion in bicuspid anatomy with a significantly higher oversize percentage in tricuspid anatomy. Conclusions: The TAVI procedure using the Myval THV system in patients with significant aortic stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve anatomy is safe and effective. Hemodynamic parameters do not differ between tricuspid and bicuspid patients. However, the permanent pacemaker implantation rate is higher than expected; its relevance on long-term survival is controversial.

Bioprosthetic Valves for Lifetime Management of Aortic Stenosis: Pearls and Pitfalls

This review explores the use of bioprosthetic valves for the lifetime management of patients with aortic stenosis, considering recent advancements in surgical (SAV) and transcatheter bioprostheses (TAV). We examine the strengths and challenges of each approach and their long-term implications. We highlight differences among surgical bioprostheses regarding durability and consider novel surgical valves such as the Inspiris Resilia, Intuity rapid deployment, and Perceval sutureless bioprostheses. The impact of hemodynamics on the performance and durability of these prostheses is discussed, as well as the benefits and considerations of aortic root enlargement during Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement (SAVR). Alternative surgical methods like the Ross procedure and the Ozaki technique are also considered. Addressing bioprosthesis failure, we compare TAV-in-SAV with redo SAVR. Challenges with TAVR, such as TAV explantation and considerations for coronary circulation, are outlined. Finally, we explore the potential challenges and limitations of several clinical strategies, including the TAVR-first approach, in the context of aortic stenosis lifetime management. This concise review provides a snapshot of the current landscape in aortic bioprostheses for physicians and surgeons.

A model of fluid-structure and biochemical interactions for applications to subclinical leaflet thrombosis

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis (SLT) is a potentially serious complication of aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic valve in which blood clots form on the replacement valve. SLT is associated with increased risk of transient ischemic attacks and strokes and can progress to clinical leaflet thrombosis. SLT following aortic valve replacement also may be related to subsequent structural valve deterioration, which can impair the durability of the valve replacement. Because of the difficulty in clinical imaging of SLT, models are needed to determine the mechanisms of SLT and could eventually predict which patients will develop SLT. To this end, we develop methods to simulate leaflet thrombosis that combine fluid-structure interaction and a simplified thrombosis model that allows for deposition along the moving leaflets. Additionally, this model can be adapted to model deposition or absorption along other moving boundaries. We present convergence results and quantify the model's ability to realize changes in valve opening and pressures. These new approaches are an important advancement in our tools for modeling thrombosis because they incorporate both adhesion to the surface of the moving leaflets and feedback to the fluid-structure interaction.

Structural analysis of regional transcatheter aortic valve underexpansion and its implications for subclinical leaflet thrombosis

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis has been increasingly recognized following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Determining the risk factors is vital in preventing clinical leaflet thrombosis and ensuring long-term value durability. Clinical data have indicated that regional stent under-expansion of transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs), particularly self-expanding devices, may be associated with an increased risk of subclinical leaflet thrombosis. This study aimed to determine the effects of regional TAV frame under-expansion on leaflet kinematics, leaflet structural characteristics, and explore its impact on the likelihood of leaflet thrombosis. In this study, mild and moderate regional frame under-expansion of a 26-mm CoreValve were examined using experimental testing and computational simulations. The results indicated that regional TAV frame under-expansion impairs leaflet kinematics and reduces the range of motion in leaflets with an angle less than 120°. The reduced range of motion can increase blood stasis on the surface of the TAV leaflets. The results also demonstrated that regional frame under-expansion induced localized high-stress regions in the leaflets close to the fixed boundary edge. The increased mechanical stress can lead to accelerated tissue degeneration. The study improves our understanding of the effects of regional stent under-expansion in TAVR. Post-procedural balloon dilatation of self-expanding TAVs can potentially be advantageous in reducing leaflet distortion and normalizing leaflet stress distribution. Large-scale, prospective, and well-controlled studies are needed to further investigate regional TAV frame under-expansion effects on subclinical leaflet thrombosis and long-term valve durability.

Strut Inversion During Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Unknown Complication?

A 74-year-old man presented with failure of a bioprosthetic aortic valve implanted 7 years earlier, with a mean gradient of 44 mm Hg across the aortic valve. During valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement, we came across an unusual complication of strut inversion at the lower end of the valve. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated surgical aortic and mitral bioprosthesis: Current state and future perspectives

The use of bioprosthetic valves for treating patients with severe valve disease has increased over the last 2 decades, and, as a consequence, a growing number of patients with failing surgical bioprosthesis is expected in the near future. In this setting, valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic/mitral valve replacement (TAVR and TMVR) has emerged as an alternative to redo surgery. Despite the increasing experience in ViV procedures, the development of these techniques faces several specific challenges, mainly related to the unique anatomical and physiological characteristics presented in ViV-TAVR/TMVR. Subsequently, various approaches have been proposed to overcome ViV-related complications and pitfalls. A growing body of evidence is currently available concerning early- and long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ViV-TAVR/TMVR. These data should be comprehensively evaluated by the Heart Team in the decision-making process involving patients with failing surgical bioprostheses. In this review, we aimed to delineate the technical challenges and risks associated with ViV-TAVR and ViV-TMVR, provide an updated overview of the main clinical results, and summarize the future perspectives of this evolving field.

Advancements in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Focused Update

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the leading technique for aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis with conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) now limited to patients younger than 65-75 years due to a combination of unsuitable anatomies (calcified raphae in bicuspid valves, coexistent aneurysm of the ascending aorta) and concerns on the absence of long-term data on TAVI durability. This incredible rise is linked to technological evolutions combined with increased operator experience, which led to procedural refinements and, accordingly, to better outcomes. The article describes the main and newest technical improvements, allowing an extension of the indications (valve-in-valve procedures, intravascular lithotripsy for severely calcified iliac vessels), and a reduction of complications (stroke, pacemaker implantation, aortic regurgitation).

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid valves: The synergistic effects of eccentric and incomplete stent deployment

Bicuspid aortic valve is a congenital cardiac anomaly and common etiology of aortic stenosis. Given the positive outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low-risk patients, TAVR will become more prevalent in the future in the treatment of severe bicuspid valve stenosis. However, asymmetrical bicuspid valve anatomy and calcification can prevent the circular and complete expansion of transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs). In previous studies, examining the impact of elliptical TAV deployment on leaflet stress distribution, asymmetric expansion of balloon-expandable intra-annular devices was studied up to an ellipticity index (long/short TAV diameter) of 1.4. However, such a high degree of eccentricity has not been observed in clinical studies with balloon-expandable devices. High degrees of stent eccentricity have been observed in self-expanding TAVs, such as CoreValve. However, CoreValve is a supra-annular device, and it was not clear if eccentric and incomplete stent deployment at the annulus would alter leaflet stress and strain distributions. This study aimed to assess the effects of eccentric and incomplete stent deployment of CoreValves in bicuspid aortic valves and compare the results to that of SAPIEN 3. Leaflet stress distribution and leaflet kinematics of 26-mm CoreValve and 26-mm SAPIEN 3 devices in bicuspid valves were obtained in a range that was observed in previous clinical studies. The results indicated that elliptical and incomplete stent deployment of TAVs increase leaflet stress and impair leaflet kinematics. The changes were more pronounced in CoreValve than SAPIEN 3. Increased leaflet stress can reduce long-term valve durability, and impaired leaflet kinematics can potentially increase blood stasis on the TAV leaflets. The study provides complementary insights into the mechanics of TAVs in bicuspid aortic valves.

Leaflet immobility and thrombosis in transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has grown exponentially worldwide in the last decade. Due to the higher bleeding risks associated with oral anticoagulation and in patients undergoing TAVR, antiplatelet therapy is currently considered first-line antithrombotic treatment after TAVR. Recent studies suggest that some patients can develop subclinical transcatheter heart valve (THV) thrombosis after the procedure, whereby thrombus forms on the leaflets that can be a precursor to leaflet dysfunction. Compared with echocardiography, multidetector computed tomography is more sensitive at detecting THV thrombosis. Transcatheter heart valve thrombosis can occur while on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and thienopyridine but significantly less with anticoagulation. This review summarizes the incidence and diagnostic criteria for THV thrombosis and discusses the pathophysiological mechanisms that may lead to thrombus formation, its natural history, potential clinical implications and treatment for these patients.

Challenging Anatomies for TAVR-Bicuspid and Beyond

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has emerged as the standard treatment for the majority of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. As transcatheter aortic valve replacement expands to patients across all risk groups, optimal patient selection strategies and device implantation techniques become increasingly important. A significant number of patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement present with challenging anatomies and clinical indications that had been historically considered a contraindication for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This article aims to highlight and discuss some of the potential obstacles that are encountered in clinical practice with a particular emphasis on bicuspid aortic valve disease.

Impact of BASILICA on the thrombogenicity potential of valve-in-valve implantations

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis is becoming a major concern in valve-in-valve procedures, whereby a transcatheter aortic valve device is deployed inside a failed bioprosthetic surgical valve. Blood flow stagnation and prolonged residence times in the neo-sinuses have been suggested as possible explanations for leaflet thrombosis. The BASILICA technique, which was originally developed to treat coronary flow obstruction, has also been proposed as an alternative to reduce the risk of thrombus formation. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of BASILICA on the valve-in-valve thrombogenicity using computational fluid dynamics simulations. To this end, two Eulerian and two Lagrangian approaches were employed to estimate near-wall stagnation measures in eight valve-in-valve models. The models included an intact or lacerated Sorin Mitroflow surgical valve, and either a SAPIEN or Evolut transcatheter aortic valve device. The Lagrangian approaches predicted a high number of particles and vortices concentration in the proximal areas of the neo-sinuses, while the Eulerian approaches did so in the distal areas. As a consequence, this study demonstrated that Lagrangian approaches are better predictors of subclinical leaflet thrombosis, since they match experimental and clinical findings. Additionally, the SAPIEN valve possess a higher risk for developing leaflet thrombosis, and two lacerations are shown to provide the best results in terms of development of vortices and accumulation of particles within the neo-sinuses. This study highlights the potential of computational modeling in aiding clinicians in their decision-making in valve-in-valve and BASILICA procedures.

Numerical models for assessing the risk of leaflet thrombosis post-transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation

Leaflet thrombosis has been suggested as the reason for the reduced leaflet motion in cases of hypoattenuated leaflet thickening of bioprosthetic aortic valves. This work aimed to estimate the risk of leaflet thrombosis in two post-valve-in-valve (ViV) configurations, using five different numerical approaches. Realistic ViV configurations were calculated by modelling the deployments of the latest version of transcatheter aortic valve devices (Medtronic Evolut PRO, Edwards SAPIEN 3) in the surgical Sorin Mitroflow. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow followed the dry models. Lagrangian and Eulerian measures of near-wall stagnation were implemented by particle and concentration tracking, respectively, to estimate the thrombogenicity and to predict the risk locations. Most of the numerical approaches indicate a higher leaflet thrombosis risk in the Edwards SAPIEN 3 device because of its intra-annular implantation. The Eulerian approaches estimated high-risk locations in agreement with the wall sheer stress (WSS) separation points. On the other hand, the Lagrangian approaches predicted high-risk locations at the proximal regions of the leaflets matching the low WSS magnitude regions of both transcatheter aortic valve implantation models and reported clinical and experimental data. The proposed methods can help optimizing future designs of transcatheter aortic valves with minimal thrombotic risks.

Predictors and Biomarkers of Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a recent revolutionary treatment for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis who are not suitable for surgery, expanding to intermediate and low-risk patients. Valve leaflet thrombosis (LT) is a potentially fatal complication after TAVI. The incidence of subclinical LT is as high as 25% among patients in the first year after TAVI. Subclinical LT may evolve into symptomatic thrombosis or lead to premature bioprosthesis degeneration, increasing the risk of neurological complications. Because imaging-based methods have limited sensitivity to detect subclinical LT, there is an urgent need for predictors and biomarkers that would make it possible to predict LT after TAVI. Here, we summarize recent data regarding (i) patient-related, (ii) procedure-related, (iii) blood-based and (iv) imaging predictors and biomarkers which might be useful for the early diagnosis of subclinical LT after TAVI. Prevention of LT might offer an opportunity to improve risk stratification and tailor therapy after TAVI.

Are the dynamic changes of the aortic root determinant for thrombosis or leaflet degeneration after transcatheter aortic valve replacement?

The role of the aortic root is to convert the accumulated elastic energy during systole into kinetic flow energy during diastole, in order to improve blood distribution in the coronary tree. Therefore, the sinuses of Valsalva of the aortic root are not predisposed to accept any bulky material, especially in case of uncrushed solid calcific agglomerates. This concept underlines the differences between surgical aortic valve replacement, in which decalcification is a main part of the procedure, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Cyclic changes in shape and size of the aortic root influence blood flow in the Valsalva sinuses. Recent papers have been investigating the dynamic changes of the aortic root and whether those differences might be correlated with clinical effects, and this paper aims to summarize part of this flourishing literature. Post-TAVR aortic root remodeling, dynamic flow and TAVR complications might have a fluidodynamic background, and clinically observed side effects such as thrombosis or leaflet degeneration should be further investigated in basic researches. Also, aortic root changes could impact valve type and size selection, affecting the decision of over-sizing or under-sizing in order to prevent valve embolization or coronary ostia obstruction.

New Insights into Valve Hemodynamics

Heart valve diseases are common disorders with five million annual diagnoses being made in the United States alone. All heart valve disorders alter cardiac hemodynamic performance; therefore, treatments aim to restore normal flow. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art clinical and engineering advancements in heart valve treatments with a focus on hemodynamics. We review engineering studies and clinical literature on the experience with devices for aortic valve treatment, as well as the latest advancements in mitral valve treatments and the pulmonic and tricuspid valves on the right side of the heart. Upcoming innovations will potentially revolutionize treatment of heart valve disorders. These advancements, and more gradual enhancements in the procedural techniques and imaging modalities, could improve the quality of life of patients suffering from valvular disease who currently cannot be treated.

On the Modeling of Patient-Specific Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Fluid-Structure Interaction Approach

PURPOSE

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a minimally invasive treatment for high-risk patients with aortic diseases. Despite its increasing use, many influential factors are still to be understood and require continuous investigation. The best numerical approach capable of reproducing both the valves mechanics and the hemodynamics is the fluid-structure interaction (FSI) modeling. The aim of this work is the development of a patient-specific FSI methodology able to model the implantation phase as well as the valve working conditions during cardiac cycles.

METHODS

The patient-specific domain, which included the aortic root, native valve and calcifications, was reconstructed from CT images, while the CAD model of the device, metallic frame and pericardium, was drawn from literature data. Ventricular and aortic pressure waveforms, derived from the patient's data, were used as boundary conditions. The proposed method was applied to two real clinical cases, which presented different outcomes in terms of paravalvular leakage (PVL), the main complication after TAVR.

RESULTS

The results confirmed the clinical prognosis of mild and moderate PVL with coherent values of regurgitant volume and effective regurgitant orifice area. Moreover, the final release configuration of the device and the velocity field were compared with postoperative CT scans and Doppler traces showing a good qualitative and quantitative matching.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the development of realistic and accurate FSI patient-specific models can be used as a support for clinical decisions before the implantation.

Valve-in-Valve TAVR: State-of-the-Art Review

An increasing number of surgically implanted bioprostheses will require re-intervention for structural valve deterioration. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV TAVR) has become an alternative to reoperative surgery, currently approved for high-risk and inoperable patients. Challenges to the technique include higher rates of prosthesis–patient mismatch and coronary obstruction, compared to native valve TAVR. Herein, we review results of ViV TAVR and novel techniques to overcome the aforementioned challenges.

Principles of TAVR valve design, modelling, and testing

INTRODUCTION

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as an effective minimally-invasive alternative to surgical valve replacement in medium- to high-risk, elderly patients with calcific aortic valve disease and severe aortic stenosis. The rapid growth of the TAVR devices market has led to a high variety of designs, each aiming to address persistent complications associated with TAVR valves that may hamper the anticipated expansion of TAVR utility.

AREAS COVERED

Here we outline the challenges and the technical demands that TAVR devices need to address for achieving the desired expansion, and review design aspects of selected, latest generation, TAVR valves of both clinically-used and investigational devices. We further review in detail some of the up-to-date modeling and testing approaches for TAVR, both computationally and experimentally, and additionally discuss those as complementary approaches to the ISO 5840-3 standard. A comprehensive survey of the prior and up-to-date literature was conducted to cover the most pertaining issues and challenges that TAVR technology faces.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The expansion of TAVR over SAVR and to new indications seems more promising than ever. With new challenges to come, new TAV design approaches, and materials used, are expected to emerge, and novel testing/modeling methods to be developed.

Impact of annular and supra-annular CoreValve deployment locations on aortic and coronary artery hemodynamics

CoreValve is widely used in transcatheter aortic valve replacement, but the impact of its deployment location on hemodynamics is unexplored despite a potential role in subsequent aortic and coronary artery pathologies. The objectives of this investigation were to perform fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations for a 29 mm CoreValve deployed in annular vs supra-annular locations, and characterize resulting hemodynamics including velocity and wall shear stress (WSS). Patient-specific geometry was reconstructed from computed tomography scans and CoreValve was deployed using a finite element approach. FSI simulations were then performed using a boundary conforming method and realistic boundary conditions. Results showed that CoreValve deployment location impacts hemodynamics in the ascending aorta and flow patterns in the coronary arteries. During peak-systole, annularly deployed CoreValve produced a jet-like flow structure impinging on the outer-curvature of the ascending aorta. Supra-annularly deployed CoreValve having a lateral tilt of 10° led to a more centered jet impinging further downstream. At mid-systole, valve leaflets of the annularly deployed CoreValve closed asymmetrically leading to disorganized flow patterns in the ascending aorta vs those from the supra-annular position. Supra-annularly deployed CoreValve also led to high-velocity para-valvular flow supplying the coronary arteries. CoreValve in the supra-annular position significantly (P < 0.05) elevated WSS within the first few diameters of both coronary arteries as compared to the annular position for many time points quantified. These results afforded by the advanced simulation methods may have important clinical implications given the role of aortic hemodynamics in dilation and the pro-atherogenic nature of WSS alterations in the coronary arteries.

Technical pitfalls and tips for the valve-in-valve procedure

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as a viable treatment modality for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis and multiple co-morbidities. More recent indications include the use of transcatheter heart valves (THV) to treat degenerated bioprosthetic surgical heart valves (SHV), which are failing due to stenosis or regurgitation. Valve-in-valve (VIV) procedures in the aortic position have been performed with a variety of THV devices, although the balloon-expandable SAPIEN valve platform (Edwards Lifesciences Ltd, Irvine, CA, USA) and self-expandable CoreValve platform (Medtronic Inc., MN, USA) have been used in majority of the patients. VIV treatment is appealing as it is less invasive than conventional surgery but optimal patient selection is vital to avoid complications such as malposition, residual high gradients and coronary obstruction. To minimize the risk of complications, thorough procedural planning is critical. The first step is identification of the degenerated SHV, including its model, size, fluoroscopic appearance. Although label size and stent internal diameter (ID) are provided by the manufacturer, it is important to note the true ID. The true ID is the ID of a SHV after the leaflets are mounted and helps determine the optimal size of THV. The second step is to determine the type and size of the THV. Although this is determined in the majority of the cases by user preference, in certain situations one THV may be more suitable than another. As the procedure is performed under fluoroscopy, the third step is to become familiarized with the fluoroscopic appearance of both the SHV and THV. This helps to determine the landmarks for optimal positioning, which in turn determines the gradients and fixation. The fourth step is to assess the risk of coronary obstruction. This is performed with either aortic root angiography or ECG-gated computerised tomography (CT). Finally, the route of approach must be carefully planned. Once these aspects are addressed, the procedure can be performed efficiently with a low risk of complications.