Type A Aortic Dissection After the Ross Procedure

Understanding Pulmonary Autograft Remodeling After the Ross Procedure: Stick to the Facts

The Ross, or pulmonary autograft, procedure presents a fascinating mechanobiological scenario. Due to the common embryological origin of the aortic and pulmonary root, the conotruncus, several authors have hypothesized that a pulmonary autograft has the innate potential to remodel into an aortic phenotype once exposed to systemic conditions. Most of our understanding of pulmonary autograft mechanobiology stems from the remodeling observed in the arterial wall, rather than the valve, simply because there have been many opportunities to study the walls of dilated autografts explanted at reoperation. While previous histological studies provided important clues on autograft adaptation, a comprehensive understanding of its determinants and underlying mechanisms is needed so that the Ross procedure can become a widely accepted aortic valve substitute in select patients. It is clear that protecting the autograft during the early adaptation phase is crucial to avoid initiating a sequence of pathological remodeling. External support in the freestanding Ross procedure should aim to prevent dilatation while simultaneously promoting remodeling, rather than preventing dilatation at the cost of vascular atrophy. To define the optimal mechanical properties and geometry for external support, the ideal conditions for autograft remodeling and the timeline of mechanical adaptation must be determined. We aimed to rigorously review pulmonary autograft remodeling after the Ross procedure. Starting from the developmental, microstructural and biomechanical differences between the pulmonary artery and aorta, we review autograft mechanobiology in relation to distinct clinical failure mechanisms while aiming to identify unmet clinical needs, gaps in current knowledge and areas for further research. By correlating clinical and experimental observations of autograft remodeling with established principles in cardiovascular mechanobiology, we aim to present an up-to-date overview of all factors involved in extracellular matrix remodeling, their interactions and potential underlying molecular mechanisms.

Autograft Root Dilation After the Ross Procedure Is Not Benign

Autograft root dilation is common after the unsupported Ross procedure. In the absence of valvar incompetence, and with the perception that dissection is exceedingly rare, expectant management of autograft aneurysm is common practice. Autograft dissection may not be as rare as thought though, as at this point 7 case reports have accrued that describe autograft dissection requiring urgent operative intervention. All had a bicuspid native aortic valve. Bicuspid aortic valve has been shown to be associated with an intrinsic, histologically demonstrated pulmonary arteriopathy, possibly contributing to autograft root dilation and dissection. Autograft root dilation can no longer be regarded as benign, especially in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. Mounting evidence further validates the practice of externally supporting the Ross autograft. For patients who have had an unsupported Ross procedure, mounting evidence may support earlier intervention for autograft root dilation and aneurysm.

Contemporary Ross procedure outcomes: medium- to long-term results in 214 patients

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to present 2 decades of our experience with the Ross procedure and its sequential modifications, adopted since 2010, to improve the reoperation rate.

METHODS

We performed a single-centre, retrospective review of database information and medical notes about the implantation technique: the freestanding root. We compared era 1 (1997-2009) and era 2 (2010-2019).

RESULTS

Between 1997 and 2019, a total of 214 Ross procedures were performed (71% men, median age 24 years) [interquartile range (IQR) 15-38]. Of these, 87% had various forms of congenital-dysplastic aortic valves. The median cross-clamping and bypass times were 173 (IQR 148-202) and 202 (IQR 182-244) min. The median postoperative stay was 6 days (2-77). Thirty-day mortality was 0.5%. The median follow-up time was 8.2 years (IQR 3.9-13.2). Survival at 10 and 20 years was 97% and 95%; freedom from greater than moderate aortic regurgitation or aortic valve intervention was 91% and 80%; and 93% of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class I. Twenty (21%) patients operated on during era 1 and 6 (9%) during era 2 underwent autograft reoperations. The median follow-up time was 14.3 (IQR 11.5-17.4) and 4.8 (IQR 2.5-7) years. Freedom from autograft reoperation was 87% and 69% at 10 and 20 years, with no significant difference between eras. Freedom from homograft reoperation was 96% and 76% at 10 and 20 years. The presence of aortic regurgitation, infective endocarditis and era 1 were predictors of autograft reoperation. Male gender and era 1 were predictors of neoaortic root dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

The contemporary modified Ross procedure continues to deliver excellent results and should remain part of the strategy to treat children and young adults requiring aortic valve replacement.