Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer

Optimizing patient outcomes: the impact of multimodal preemptive analgesia in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a multimodal preemptive analgesia management approach, specifically incorporating ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block (UG-TPVB) in conjunction with intravenous analgesia, after video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) lobectomy under the guidance of enhanced recovery after surgery.

METHODS

A total of 690 patients who underwent VATS lobectomy between October 2021 and March 2022 were divided into the UG-TPVB group (group T, n = 345) and the control group (group C, n = 345). Patients in group T received UG-TPVB prior to the induction of general anaesthesia, while group C did not undergo nerve block. A comparison was conducted between the 2 groups regarding various indicators, including postoperative sedation, static/dynamic numeric rating scale scores, intraoperative fentanyl consumption, duration of mechanical ventilation/anaesthesia recovery/hospitalization, postoperative complications and other relevant factors.

RESULTS

The static/dynamic numeric rating scale scores of group T were lower than those of group C after surgery. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption in group T (0.384 ± 0.095 mg) was lower than that in group C (0.465 ± 0.053 mg). The duration of mechanical ventilation, anaesthesia recovery and hospitalization were significantly shorter in group T compared to group C. Patient satisfaction rate in group T (70.1%) was higher than that in group C (53.6%). All differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The multimodal preemptive analgesia management strategy effectively reduces postoperative pain, decreases opioid consumption and promotes faster recovery in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy.

The learning curve of a bronchus-first method in bi-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for left upper lobe lung cancer

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has been widely used in lung cancer treatment. However, VATS left upper lobectomy (LUL) is complex due to the intricate branching pattern of the left pulmonary artery (PA). Nevertheless, VATS right upper lobectomy can be simplified through a bronchus-first and simultaneous vessel stapling technique. In this study, the learning curve was obtained while ensuring favorable oncological outcomes using bronchus-first method for VATS LUL. First, retrospective data of 148 consecutive patients who underwent VATS LUL (bronchus-first method) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from March 2018 to October 2020 were analyzed. The learning curve was then assessed via cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Moreover, data at different stages of the learning curve, including operation time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, lymph node harvested, thoracotomy conversion, postoperative complications, endoscopic stapler consumptions, and 3 year overall survival, were recorded. The learning curve was best modeled as the equation: y = - 7.78 + 2.05x-2.23 × 10-2x2 + 6.43 × 10-5x3, with a good-to-fit test R2 = 0.97. The surgeon entered the proficient stage (59th case-148th case) after consecutive operations of 58 cases (learning stage, 1st case-58th case). Notably, more lymph nodes were harvested in the proficient stage than in the learning stage (17.69 ± 1.47 vs. 15.53 ± 1.43, P < 0.01). Compared with the learning stage, the proficient stage was associated with shorter operation time (114.28 ± 8.56 min vs. 126.81 ± 7.30 min, P < 0.01), fewer blood loss (44.22 ± 7.75 mL vs. 57.41 ± 22.98 mL, P < 0.01), shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.02 ± 0.99 d vs. 7.22 ± 1.34 d, P < 0.01), and fewer endoscopic stapler consumptions (5.89 ± 0.64 vs. 6.53 ± 0.50, P < 0.01). However, thoracotomy conversion (4/90 vs. 5/58, P = 0.32), postoperative complications (10/90 vs. 11/58, P = 0.23) and 3 year overall survival (62.2% vs. 50.8%, log-rank test, P = 0.11) showed no significant difference between the two stages. The surgeon with former single-direction VATS lobectomy experience can master bronchus-first VATS LUL after attending to 58 cases.

The impact of paravertebral nerve blockade on postoperative surgical site wound pain management in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for pulmonary carcinoma resection

Management of postoperative pain is of vital importance for patients undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Pulmonary Carcinoma Resection. The study evaluates the impact of Paravertebral Nerve Blockade (PNB) in conjunction with general anaesthesia on postoperative pain relief, as compared with general anaesthesia alone. A retrospective analysis was carried out from May 2020 to May 2023, involving 100 patients with pathologically confirmed pulmonary carcinoma. The patients were divided into two groups: a control group that received general anaesthesia and an observation group that received a combination of general anaesthesia and PNB. The intensity of postoperative pain was assessed at various time intervals using the visual analogue scale (VAS), while the effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia was also evaluated. Additionally, the study examined the incidence rates of chronic pain in the postoperative period. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 27.0. Significant reductions in VAS scores for both resting and cough-induced pain were observed in the observation group at 2 and 6 h post-operation (p < 0.01). However, the difference diminished over time. The observation group had fewer patient-controlled analgesia activations and required lower dosages of hydromorphone at both 24- and 48-h post-operation. The incidence of chronic pain was also significantly lower in the observation group (24.00%) compared with the control group (54.00%) (p < 0.01). PNB, when administered in combination with general anaesthesia, significantly reduces immediate postoperative pain and the requirement for additional analgesics in patients undergoing VATS for pulmonary carcinoma resection. The effect diminishes over time but has a lasting impact on reducing the incidence of chronic postoperative pain.

[Modern Perioperative Care Concepts in Thoracic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS)]

In modern perioperative care concepts, multimodal ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) is a multimodal perioperative treatment concept for improving postoperative recovery of surgical patients after an operation. This is managed by the so-called ERAS Society and through which hospitals can also be officially certified. The focus of the ERAS concept is on uniform patient care from admission to discharge, with the aim of improving perioperative processes by implementing evidence-based protocols involving a multidisciplinary treatment team. In 2019, ERAS guidelines were published for the first time by the European Society of Thoracic Surgery (ESTS), in cooperation with the ERAS Society, for specific lung resection procedures, and these identified a total of 45 graduated recommendations or Enhanced Recovery Pathways (ERP). The implementation of ERAS concepts in thoracic surgery (ERATS = Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery) is intended to establish standardised perioperative procedures based on study results and/or expert recommendations. These recommendations take into account organisational aspects as well as thoracic surgical and anaesthesiological procedures, with the overriding goal of creating a structured treatment plan tailored to the patient. All these measures should result in a multimodal overall concept, which should primarily lead to an improved outcome after elective thoracic surgery and secondarily to shorter hospital stays with correspondingly lower costs.This review article describes basic ERAS principles and provides a compact presentation of the most important European ERAS recommendations from the authors' point of view, together with typical obstacles to the implementation of the corresponding ERATS program in German thoracic surgery.

Vats lobectomy for lung cancer. What has been the evolution over the time?

Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is the treatment of choice for early-stage lung cancer. It is safe and effective compared to open surgery, as demonstrated by a large body of scientific evidence over the last few decades. VATS lobectomy's evolution was driven by the need to decrease post-operative pain by reducing the extent of surgical accesses, maintaining the same oncological efficacy of open lobectomy with less invasiveness. VATS lobectomy just turned 30 years old, evolving and changing significantly from its origins. The aim of this mini review is to retrace the history, starting from a multiport approach to a single port approach. At the end of this mini review, we will discuss the advanced and the future challenges of the technique that has revolutionized thoracic surgery.

Junior surgeons are quicker to master the single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy: comprehensive analysis of the learning curve and oncological outcomes

BACKGROUND

The learning curve of single-port thoracoscopic lobectomy (SPTL) in lung cancer has been widely studied. However, the efficiency of different experience levels of thoracic surgeons in mastering the learning curve is unknown. Hence, we discuss this issue in depth by using several perioperative parameters and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 120 consecutive cases of SPTL performed by a senior (STS group) and junior (JTS group) thoracic surgeons were retrospectively analyzed. Operation time, estimated blood loss, and duration of postoperative hospital stay were recorded for cumulative summation (CUSUM) learning curve analysis, while the 5-year survival rate was used for oncological evaluation.

RESULTS

The CUSUM learning curve of the STS group was y = 0.000106x³ - 0.019x² + 0.852x - 0.036, with a high R-value of 0.9517. When the number of cases exceeded 33, the slope changed from positive to negative. The CUSUM learning curve of the JTS group was y = 0.000266x³ - 0.04x² + 1.429 × -0.335, with a high R-value of 0.9644. When the number of cases exceeded 25, the slope changed from positive to negative. The learning curve was divided into two phases (phases 1 and 2). The slope of the JTS group in phase 1 was greater than that of the STS group in phase 1 (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, comparisons of various parameters between both groups in phase 2 showed no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). In addition, the 5-year survival rate was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.72).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to analyze the learning curve of thoracic surgeons with different experience levels in mastering SPTL. Moreover, it is also the first study to include multiple perioperative parameters and overall survival to study how quickly surgeons master the SPTL technique. The junior thoracic surgeon was found to have a shorter learning curve for SPTL.

The protocol for the prehabilitation for thoracic surgery study: a randomized pragmatic trial comparing a short home-based multimodal program to aerobic training in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Prehabilitation has been shown to have a positive effect on the postoperative recovery of functional capacity in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy. The optimal way to implement prehabilitation programs, such as the optimal forms of prehabilitation, duration, intensity, and methods to improve compliance, remained to be studied. This Prehabilitation for Thoracic Surgery Study will compare the effectiveness of multimodal and aerobic training-only programs in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy.

METHODS

This randomized pragmatic trial will be conducted in Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) and include 100 patients who are eligible to undergo VATS lobectomy. Patients will be randomized to a multimodal or aerobic training group. Prehabilitation training guidance will be provided by a multidisciplinary care team. The patients in the multimodal group will perform aerobic exercises, resistance exercises, breathing exercises, psychological improvement strategies, and nutritional supplementation. Meanwhile, the patients in the aerobic group will conduct only aerobic exercises. The interventions will be home-based and supervised by medical providers. The patients will be followed up until 30 days after surgery to investigate whether the multimodal prehabilitation program differs from the aerobic training program in terms of the magnitude of improvement in functional capability pre- to postoperatively. The primary outcome will be the perioperative 6-min walk distance (6MWD). The secondary outcomes will include the postoperative pulmonary functional recovery status, health-related quality of life score, incidence of postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes.

DISCUSSION

Prehabilitation remains a relatively new approach that is not widely performed by thoracic surgery patients. The existing studies mainly focus on unimodal interventions. While multimodal prehabilitation strategies have been shown to be preferable to unimodal strategies in a few studies, the evidence remains scarce for thoracic surgery patients. The results of this study will contribute to the understanding of methods for thoracoscopic lobectomy patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04049942 . Registered on August 8, 2019.

Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Lobectomy after Recent COVID-19 Infection

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 outbreak had a massive impact on lung cancer patients with the rise in the incidence and mortality of lung cancer.

METHODS

We evaluated whether a recent COVID-19 infection affected the outcome of patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer using a retrospective observational mono-centric study conducted between January 2020 and August 2022. Postoperative complications and 90-day mortality were reported. We compared lung cancer patients with a recent history of COVID-19 infection prior to thoracoscopic lobectomy to those without recent COVID-19 infection. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-three consecutive lung cancer patients were enrolled. Of these 30 (19%), had a history of recent COVID-19 infection prior to surgery. COVID-19 was not associated with a higher complication rate or 90-day mortality. Patients with recent COVID-19 infection had more frequent pleural adhesions (p = 0.006). There were no differences between groups regarding postoperative complications, conversion, drain removal time, total drainage output, and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 infection did not affect the outcomes of thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer. The treatment of these patients should not be delayed in case of recent COVID-19 infection and should not differ from that of the general population.

Lobectomías pulmonares en Colombia: una caracterización demográfica y clínico-patológica

Introducción. La lobectomía pulmonar es uno de los procedimientos más frecuentes en la cirugía torácica en Colombia y a nivel mundial. El objetivo de este estudio fue proporcionar información sobre el comportamiento clínico de los individuos sometidos a este tipo de cirugías. Métodos. Estudio observacional retrospectivo en un Hospital Universitario de Cali, Colombia, que incluyó todos los pacientes sometidos a lobectomía pulmonar, por causas benignas o malignas, entre los años 2010 y 2020. La información se extrajo del registro institucional de cirugía de tórax, obteniendo datos demográficos, clínicos y patológicos. Resultados. Se evaluaron los registros clínicos de 207 individuos. El 55,5 % eran mujeres, la edad promedio fue 58 años y el 41 % tuvieron antecedente de tabaquismo. En el 51,6 % de los casos se diagnosticaron neoplasias, de las cuales el 47,8 % eran primarias de pulmón, siendo el adenocarcinoma el subtipo más común. Las enfermedades benignas no tumorales representaron el 48,3 % de los casos y la causa más frecuente fueron las infecciones, dentro de las que se incluyeron 17 casos de tuberculosis pulmonar. La técnica más frecuente fue la cirugía toracoscópica video asistida (82,6 %). Presentaron un porcentaje de reintervención del 5,8 %, 10,6 % de complicaciones severas y una mortalidad hospitalaria del 4,3 %. Conclusión. La población evaluada muestra una carga alta de comorbilidades y riesgo operatorio elevado; de forma consecuente, al compararla con otras series internacionales, se encontró un porcentaje mayor de complicaciones perioperatorias y mortalidad.

Is the Evaluation of Robot-Assisted Surgery Based on Sufficient Scientific Evidence?

Robot-assisted surgery is becoming an increasingly common approach for lung cancer resection [...].

Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes after Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Using the Perioperative Symptom Assessment for Lung Surgery Scale

This study aimed to use a new special inventory for lung surgery patients to evaluate postoperative symptoms and functional status and to identify factors that may affect these after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). In this single-center longitudinal cohort observational study, we used a new scale, the perioperative symptom assessment for lung surgery (PSA-Lung), to evaluate the recovery from symptoms and the functional status of patients undergoing uniportal VATS. We divided patients into two groups, according to patients' symptom scores, and compared the clinical characteristics between the two groups under each item. Then, we conducted a qualitative interview regarding coughing in postoperative week 4. Exactly 104 patients were enrolled in this study. The two highest-scoring patient-reported outcome (PRO) items were "shortness of breath" and "coughing" in the fourth week after surgery. Thirty-one patients reported that "coughing" severely influenced their lives in postoperative week 4. Using the PSA-Lung inventory, we found that "shortness of breath" was the worst symptom in postoperative week 4. Although "coughing" was not the most important symptom in the early postoperative period, it affected some patients' lives in postoperative week 4. Therefore, further research is required to determine the optimal cut-off point for coughing.

[Robotic-assisted Thoracic Surgery]

In the last decade robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) emerged as a new minimally invasive surgical modality to operate pulmonary, mediastinal and esophageal diseases. Superior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), RATS affords accurate surgical manipulation in spatially confined anatomical regions. Numerous surgical case studies demonstrated technical reliability and oncological equivalence of RATS compared to open surgery and VATS. Consequently, the number of RATS operations for oncological and non-oncological resections is rising rapidly. The lacking evidence of therapy improvement in the context of significantly increased treatment costs slows the development. Currently, various new companies introduce new robotic surgical platforms into the market and it is expected that market competition will change the costs of these modern therapies. This article summarizes the technical features of RATS and its anesthesiologic implications for patient management.

A retrospective and prospective study to establish a preoperative difficulty predicting model for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection

Background

In previous studies, the difficulty of surgery has rarely been used as a research object. Our study aimed to develop a predictive model to enable preoperative prediction of the technical difficulty of video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection using retrospective data and to validate our findings prospectively.

Methods

Collected data according to the designed data table and took the operation time as the outcome variable. A nomogram to predict the difficulty of surgery was established through Lasso logistic regression. The prospective datasets were analyzed and the outcome was the operation time.

Results

This retrospective study enrolled 351 patients and 85 patients were included in the prospective datasets. The variables in the retrospective research were selected by Lasso logistic regression (only used for modeling and not screening), and four significantly related influencing factors were obtained: FEV1/FVC (forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced vital capacity) (p < 0.001, OR, odds ratio = 0.89, 95% CI, confidence interval = 0.84–0.94), FEV1/pred FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in the first second/forced expiratory volume in the first second in predicted) (p = 0.076, OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.95–1.00), history of lung disease (p = 0.027, OR = 4.00, 95% CI = 1.27–15.64), and mediastinal lymph node enlargement or calcification (p < 0.001, OR = 9.78, 95% CI = 5.10–19.69). We used ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves to evaluate the model. The training set AUC (area under curve) value was 0.877, the test set’s AUC was 0.789, and the model had a good calibration curve. In a prospective study, the data obtained in the research cohort were brought into the model again for verification, and the AUC value was 0.772.

Conclusion

Our retrospective study identified four preoperative variables that are correlated with a longer surgical time and can be presumed to reflect more difficult surgical procedures. Our prospective study verified that the variables in the prediction model (including prior lung disease, FEV1/pred FEV1, FEV1/FVC, mediastinal lymph node enlargement or calcification) were related to the difficulty.

Economic impact of powered stapler in video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung Cancer in a Chinese tertiary hospital: a cost-minimization analysis

BACKGROUND

To assess the economic impact of powered stapler use in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer in a Chinese tertiary care hospital.

METHODS

This study identified 388 patients who received VATS lobectomy using the ECHELON powered stapler (n = 296) or the ECHELON manual stapler (n = 92) for lung cancer in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Multiple generalized linear regression analyses were conducted using data on hospital costs and patient characteristics to develop predictive equations for hospital costs in a cost-minimization analysis (CMA) model comparing hospital costs associated with the ECHELON powered stapler and the ECHELON manual stapler. CMA model was used to conduct scenario analysis to compare the ECHELON powered stapler with another manual stapler (Victor Medical).

RESULTS

The multiple generalized linear regression analyses identified that using the ECHELON powered stapler in VATS lobectomy for lung cancer was associated with significantly lower drug costs than using the ECHELON manual stapler (coefficient - 0.256, 95% confidence interval: - 0.375 to - 0.139). The CMA model estimated that the ECHELON powered stapler could save hospital costs by ¥1653 when compared with the ECHELON manual stapler (¥65,531 vs. ¥67,184). The use of the ECHELON powered stapler also saved hospital costs by ¥4411 when compared with the Victor Medical manual stapler (¥65,531 vs. ¥69,942) in the scenario analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to the two manual staplers used for VATS lobectomy for lung cancer in a Chinese tertiary hospital, the ECHELON powered stapler had 100% probability to save total hospital costs under present prices of the three staplers according to the CMA.

Comparative early results of a robotics-assisted endoscope holder in single port thoracoscopic surgery in the era of COVID-19

Background

Innovations in surgical instruments have made single-port surgery more widely accepted and lead to a reduced demand for surgical assistants. As COVID-19 has ravaged the world, maintaining minimum medical staffing requirements and proper social distancing have become major topics of interest. We sought to evaluate the feasibility of applying the unisurgeon approach in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery aided by a robotic camera holder.

Methods

Operative time, blood loss, setup time, postoperative hospital stays, and the number of participating surgeons in single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resections were gathered for investigation after the introduction of the ENDOFIX^exo robotic endoscope holder system. In this cohort, we collected 213 patients who underwent single port video thoracoscope surgery, including 57 patients underwent robotic endoscope arm assisted surgery and case-matched 52 patients in the robotic arm–assisted group with patients in the human-assisted group through propensity score–matched analysis.

Results

In wedge resection, a single surgeon was able to completely operate on all lobes of target lesions. However, for anatomical resections, namely segmentectomy, the success rate was 95%, and for lobectomy, the success rate was only 64%. No significant differences between setup times, blood loss, or operative times between the two groups were observed.

Conclusions

When an experienced uniport surgeon is assisted by a robotic endoscope holder, wedge resection is the most suitable procedure to be performed through unisurgeon single-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery without increasing setup time, operative time, or short-term complications. Verification of the technique’s applicability for use in anatomic resections requires further investigation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09054-8.

Cutting-edge Nanotechnological Approaches for Lung Cancer Therapy

Lung cancer is the second leading cancer with a high rate of mortality. It can be treated using different intervention techniques such as chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgical removal, and photodynamic therapy. All of these interventions lack specificity, implying that it harms the normal cells adjacent to the infected ones. Nanotechnology provides a promising solution that increases the bioavailability of anticancer drugs at the tumor site with reduced toxicity and improved therapeutic efficacy. Nanotechnology also improves the way lung cancer is diagnosed and treated. Various nanocarriers like liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles, and different theranostic approaches are already approved for medical use, while various are under clinical and preclinical stages. This review article covers the details about lung cancer, types of overexpressed receptors, and cutting-edge nanocarriers used for treating lung cancer at its specific target.

Special Anesthesiologic Considerations in Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Purpose of Review

This review summarizes the key issues for preoperative, peri- and intraoperative, and postoperative patient management for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). It provides practical guidance for anesthesiologists and thoracic surgeons starting a RATS program.

Recent Findings

RATS is a new technological approach to execute minimal invasive chest operations. In management of RATS patients, the established ERAS principles for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) apply. In addition, RATS imposes additional conditions on anesthesiologists, nurses, and surgeons alike: The spatial constriction in operation theaters caused by the large robotic equipment longs for a reallocation of the anesthetist’s and surgeon’s working environment that may vary additionally depending on the type of surgery performed in the individual patient. Additionally, the implementation of a positive pressure carbon dioxide gas cavity in the pleura has a direct effect on patient cardio-circulatory and respiratory mechanics that have to be balanced by the anesthesiologist.

Summary

RATS advances by replacing open surgery approaches and will complement—but most likely not replace—video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). RATS brings new specific intraoperative requirements to the anesthesiological and surgical team members that have to be implemented into clinical routine.

Early discharge on postoperative day 1 following lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer is safe in high-volume surgical centres: a national cancer database analysis

OBJECTIVES

Shortening hospital length of stay after lobectomy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a challenge, and the literature regarding factors associated with safe early discharge is limited. We sought to evaluate the safety of postoperative day (POD) 1 discharge after lobectomy and its correlation with institutional caseload using the National Cancer Database, jointly sponsored by the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society.

METHODS

We identified patients with stage I NSCLC (tumour ≤4 cm, clinical N0, M0) in the National Cancer Database who underwent lobectomy from 2010 to 2015. Hospital surgical volume was assigned based on total surgical volume for lung cancer. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: POD 1 discharge [length of stay (LOS) ≤ 1] and the standard discharge (LOS > 1). Outcome variables were compared in propensity matched cohorts, and the multivariable regression model was created to assess factors associated with LOS ≤ 1 and the occurrence of adverse events (unplanned readmissions, 30- and 90-day deaths).

RESULTS

A total of 52 830 patients underwent lobectomy for stage I NSCLC across 1231 treating facilities; 3879 (7.3%) patients were discharged on day 1 (LOS ≤ 1), whereas 48 951 (92.7%) were discharged after day 1 (LOS > 1). Factors associated with LOS ≤ 1 included male sex, higher socioeconomic status, right middle lobectomy, minimally invasive surgery and high-volume centres. The risk of adverse events was higher for LOS ≤ 1 in low [odds ratio (OR): 1.913, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.448-2.527; P < 0.001] and median quartiles (OR: 2.258; 95% CI 1.881-2.711; P < 0.001), but equivalent in high-volume centres (OR: 0.871, 95% CI 0.556-1.364; P = 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy of early discharge on POD 1 following lobectomy are associated with lung cancer surgical volume. Implementation of 'enhanced recovery' protocols is likely related to safe early discharges from high-volume centres.

Comparison of Postoperative Quality of Life and Pain with and without a Metal Rib Spreader in Patients Undergoing Lobectomy through Axillary Mini-Thoracotomy for Stage I Lung Cancer

Purpose: To evaluate postoperative patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and pain with and without a metal rib spreader (MRS) in patients with stage I lung cancer who underwent lobectomy through axillary mini-thoracotomy (AMT).

Methods: This single-institution prospective observational study enrolled patients between January 2015 and April 2018. Their QOL and pain were evaluated using the EQ-5D and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 items (QLQ-C30). The EQ-5D was completed preoperatively (Pre) and on days 1/3/5/7 (D1/3/5/7), at 1 month (M1), and at 1 year postoperatively (Y1). The EORTC QLQ-C30 was completed at Pre, M1, and Y1.

Results: The data of 140 patients were analyzed (video-assisted without MRS: VA/noMRS: 67, AMT with MRS: AMT/MRS: 73). Although the AMT/MRS group had more preoperative comorbidities, longer operative times, and more blood loss than the VA/noMRS group, the EQ-5D visual analog scale scores were not significantly different at any assessment point (Pre/D1/D3/D5/D7/M1/Y1) (VA/noMRS: 82/48/60/67/73/77/85, AMT/MRS: 80/46/60/66/73/76/85). Postoperative pain in the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EORTC QLQ-C30 was comparable between the groups.

Conclusion: VA/noMRS and AMT/MRS showed similar postoperative QOL and pain scores, indicating that MRS negligibly impacts the postoperative QOL and pain.

Trends in open lobectomy outcomes for lung cancer over the last 15 years: national cohort

OBJECTIVE

Adoption of thoracoscopic lobectomy has been increasing in the US; however, open lobectomy (OL) is still performed in half of the cases. Postoperative care and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have evolved and improved outcomes. The study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes of OL over the last 15 years.

METHODS

Patients who underwent lobectomy for lung cancer between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and divided into three groups; pre-ERAS (2005-2011), transitional period (2012-2015), and wider ERAS implementation (2016-2019). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared and multivariable regression analysis was constructed to assess independent predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

OL was comprised of 40% of lobectomies for lung cancer. 10,021 patients met inclusion criteria. 49% were males and mean age was 67. Patients who belonged to the (2016-2019) period group had significantly higher comorbidities and ASA classification. General surgeons performed < 10% of OL in 2016-2019 compared to over 30% during 2005-2011. Patients in the 2016-2019 period were less likely to experience unplanned intubation, surgical site infections, and sepsis. Mortality was also significantly lower than the previous groups (1.9% vs 2.0% and 2.8%, p = 0.05). The rate of discharge to facility as well as length of hospital stays improved over the years. The surgeon specialty served as an independent predictor for length of stay, unplanned intubation, and home discharge.

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of OL are improving over the years. Increasing number of these surgeries being performed by dedicated thoracic surgeons and ERAS pathways are likely helping improve outcomes.

Nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy surgery: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Adjuvants to local anesthetics, such as nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine, can be used to improve the quality and duration of peripheral nerve block effects. Dexmedetomidine has been successfully used as an adjuvant of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with ropivacaine in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy surgeries (VATLS). This study aimed to compare the effects of nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine used as adjuvants to ropivacaine for ESPB in VATLS.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients undergoing VATLS with ESPB were enrolled and randomized into 3 groups, each of which received a different adjuvant to ropivacaine. The visual analogue scale score, onset and duration of sensory block, use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), rate of rescue analgesia, duration of postoperative hospitalization, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and chronic pain were measured and observed.

RESULTS

The visual analogue scale score, total PCA use, rate of rescue analgesia, and postoperative chronic pain in the ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine (RD), and ropivacaine with nalbuphine (RN) groups were lower than those in the ropivacaine (RC) group (P < .05). The duration of sensory block was longer and the first use of PCA occurred later in the RD and RN groups than they did in the RC group (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

As an adjuvant to ropivacaine in ESPB, nalbuphine and dexmedetomidine are comparable in terms of the associated analgesia, sensory block duration, need for rescue analgesia, and incidence of chronic pain in patients after VATLS.

Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Lobectomy is the standard treatment for early non-small cell lung cancer. Various surgical techniques for lobectomy have been developed, and minimally invasive thoracic surgery, such as video-assisted thoracic surgery or robot-assisted thoracic surgery, has been considered as an alternative to conventional open thoracotomy. The recently robotic lobectomy technique has developed since the first case series was published in 2002. Several studies have reported that robotic lobectomy has comparable oncologic and perioperative outcomes to those of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy and open lobectomy. However, robotic lobectomy remains a challenge for surgeons because of the steep learning curve, reduced tactile sensation, difficulty in port placement, and challenges in cooperation between the surgeon and assistant. Many studies have reported on robotic lobectomy, but few have presented surgical techniques for robotic lobectomy. In this article, the surgical techniques and optimal performance of robotic lobectomy are described in detail for all 5 types of lobectomy for surgeons beginning with robotic lobectomy.

Effects of Vessel Interruption Sequence During Lobectomy for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: For lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whether interrupting the pulmonary vein first (Vein-first) achieves better perioperative and survival outcomes than interrupting the pulmonary artery first (Artery-first) remains controversial. We conducted this meta-analysis to compare outcomes between the two groups to facilitate better surgical decision-making.

Methods: Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus were searched for eligible studies comparing Vein-first and Artery-first procedures. The primary endpoints were survival indicators [overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS)]. Secondary endpoints included intraoperative indicators, hospitalization, and follow-up indicators.

Results: After screening 2,505 studies, 8 studies involving 1,714 patients (Vein-First group: 881 patients; Artery-first group: 833 patients) were included. The vein-first group achieved better OS [HR (hazard ratio): 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–1.91, p = 0.005], DFS (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.23–2.08, p < 0.001), and LCSS (HR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.16–2.31, p = 0.005). The survival rates of OS at 2–5 years, DFS at 1–5 years, and LCSS at 3–5 years were also higher in the Vein-First group. Subgroup analyses suggested that the advantages of survival in the Vein-First group were primarily embodied in the subgroups of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and earlier pathological TNM stage (I–II). Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, total complications, and total recurrences were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusions: The Vein-first sequence is the suitable choice of vessel interruption sequence during lobectomy for NSCLC with better survival and similar perioperative outcomes, especially for stage I–II SCC.

How We Do It: Mediastinal Staging for Lung Cancer

Mediastinal lymph node staging in the setting of known or suspected lung cancer is supported by multiple professional societies as standard for high-quality care, yet proper mediastinal staging often is lacking. Neglecting pathologic lymph node sampling can understage or overstage the patient and lead to inappropriate treatment. Although some cases of nodal disease are radiographically obvious, others are not as apparent, and both situations require pathologic proof to allow for appropriate treatment selection. This article discusses the nuances of mediastinal staging and emphasizes the usefulness of a multidisciplinary approach and dialog to address lung cancer staging and treatment. We summarize the relevant guidelines and literature and provide a case scenario to illustrate the approach to mediastinal staging from our viewpoints as a thoracic surgeon and pulmonologist.

Dexmedetomidine for early postoperative cognitive dysfunction after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in elderly male patients with lung cancer

This retrospective study explored the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine in treating early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (EPPNCD) after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VATL) in elderly male patients with lung cancer (LC).This study included a total of 80 elderly male patients with LC who received VATL. All of them were equally assigned to a treatment group and a control group, with 40 patients each group. The primary outcome included cognitive dysfunction, as evaluated by mini-mental state examination scale. The secondary outcomes consisted of incidence of EPPNCD, lung function (as measured by forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, peak expiratory flow, and maximal voluntary ventilation), and adverse events. All outcome data were analyzed before and 3 days after surgery.After surgery, all patients in the treatment group exerted better efficacy in mini-mental state examination scale (P < .01) and incidence of EPPNCD (P = .03), than patients in the control group. However, no significant differences were detected in forced vital capacity (P = .65), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (P = .50), peak expiratory flow (P = .73), and maximal voluntary ventilation (P = .27) between 2 groups. In addition, there is similar safety profile between 2 groups.The findings of this study showed that dexmedetomidine may benefit EPPNCD after VATL in elderly male patients with LC. Future studies are needed to warrant the present conclusions.

Survival After Thoracoscopic Surgery or Open Lobectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been shown to reduce hospital stays and pain compared with open lobectomy to treat non-small cell lung cancer. Because of the low rate of deaths, it is difficult to show differences in survival in individual studies. The objective of this study was to compare short- and long-term mortality by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

The reviewers systematically searched studies that compared VATS vs open lobectomy and provided data on 30-day mortality or long-term survival (>5 years). For long-term outcomes, studies included patients with the same cancer stage or, if several stages were included, the studies had to control for cancer stage in their propensity score model. A pooled odds ratio and hazard ratio (HR) was respectively calculated for short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 33 works were identified, comprising 61,633 patients. VATS led to lower postoperative mortality (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.73) and higher long-term survival (HR, .88; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.96). Disease-free survival was similar in both groups (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.10).

CONCLUSIONS

For non-small cell lung cancer treated with lobectomy, VATS was associated with lower postoperative mortality and greater long-term survival compared with open lobectomy. Disease-free survival was similar between both groups.

Is less really more? Reexamining video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy in the setting of an enhanced recovery protocol

OBJECTIVES

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy has been associated with improved pain, length of stay, and outcomes compared with open lobectomy. However, enhanced recovery protocols improve outcomes after both procedures. We aimed to compare video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and open lobectomy in the setting of a comprehensive enhanced recovery protocol.

METHODS

All patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer at a single institution since the adoption of an enhanced recovery protocol (May 2016 to December 2018) were stratified by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open status and compared. Demographics and outcomes, including length of stay, daily pain scores, and short-term operative complications, were compared using standard univariate statistics and multivariable models.

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients underwent lobectomy, including 71 (54.6%) undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and 59 (45.4%) undergoing open surgery. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open cases exhibited similar length of stay (median 4 days for both, P = .07), opioid requirement (33.2 vs 30.8 mg morphine equivalents, P = .86), and pain scores at 0, 1, 2, and 3 days after surgery (4.3 vs 2.8, P = .12; 4.4 vs 3.7, P = .27; 3.9 vs 3.5, P = .83; and 3.4 vs 3.5, P = .98, respectively). Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy exhibited lower rates of readmission (1.4% vs 17.0%, P < .01), postoperative transfusion requirement (0% vs 10.2%, P < .01), and pneumonia (1.4% vs 10.2%, P = .05). After risk adjustment, an open procedure (vs video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery status) did not significantly affect the length of stay (effect 0.18; P = .10) or overall complication rate (odds ratio, 1.9; P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of a comprehensive enhanced recovery protocol, patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy exhibited similar short-term outcomes. Surgical incision may have less impact on outcomes in the setting of a comprehensive thoracic enhanced recovery protocol.

The effects of ultrasound-guided serratus plane block, in combination with general anesthesia, on intraoperative opioid consumption, emergence time, and hemodynamic stability during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: A randomized prospective study

BACKGROUND

Thoracotomy is one of the most painful surgeries; therefore, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) was developed to reduce the surgical stress of thoracotomy. Although VATS results in reduced postoperative pain compared with thoracotomy, it is still painful. Serratus plane block (SPB) is a novel technique that provides lateral chest wall analgesia by blocking the lateral branch of the intercostal nerve.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study in 50 patients, aged 20 to 75 years, undergoing three-port VATS lobectomy. Group G (n = 25) received conventional general anesthesia and Group S (n = 25) received SPB before induction of general anesthesia. In Group S, 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine was injected between the serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi muscles. During surgery, anesthesia was maintained by adjusting the propofol dose to maintain a bispectral index of 40 to 60 and the remifentanil dose to maintain blood pressure and heart rate within 70 to 130% of baseline.

RESULTS

Intraoperative remifentanil consumption was significantly lower in Group S compared to that in Group G (519.9 μg vs 1047.7 μg, P < .001). Moreover, emergence time was significantly shorter in Group S compared to Group G (10.8 minutes vs 14.9 minutes, P = .01). However, there were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure and heart rate (HR) between the groups at each time point. The doses of rescue drugs for the control of blood pressure and HR were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided SPB could be a safe and effective regional anesthesia technique for VATS.

Clinical outcomes following an initial experience with a novel powered vascular stapler in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomies: results of a Chinese multi-center study

Background

The development of minimally invasive surgical approaches has revolutionized surgical care and greatly improved surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a powered vascular stapler (PVS) during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Methods

This prospective, multi-center, post-market clinical study in China enrolled 50 patients with either a suspected or formal diagnosis of clinical stage IA to IIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) scheduled for VATS lobectomy. The clinical effectiveness of the PVS for successful pulmonary artery (PA)/pulmonary vein (PV) transection was evaluated. In addition, the surgeon's stress, device usability, and surgeon satisfaction were measured using multiple questionnaires.

Results

A total of 167 PAs/PVs were transected with 3 (1.8%) requiring intra-operative intervention. Fourteen of the 50 patients (28.0%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), among whom 5 (10.0%) suffered from serious AEs. There were no postoperative hemorrhagic complications related to transection of the PA/PV with PVS. Surgeon satisfaction was surveyed by questionnaire after each of the 50 procedures resulting in a 96% reported satisfaction with device usability, specifically related to a low stress load and an increase in work efficiency.

Conclusions

For VATS lobectomy, the PVS demonstrated a positive surgical effectiveness and value in cognitive and physical distress reduction. Complications following VATS lobectomy to treat NSCLC were generally low and as expected. Intraoperative complications were few and there were no postoperative complications related to the transection of the PA and PV during VATS lobectomy. Favorable results were reported on the surgeon satisfaction questionnaire regarding usability and surgeon stress.