The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2020 Update on Outcomes and Research

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2024 Update on Outcomes and Research

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS GTSD) remains the largest and most comprehensive audited thoracic surgical database in the world. As the STS GTSD grows to nearly 1 million cases, the pulmonary resection for cancer and esophagectomy short-term risk models have been refined to provide participants with benchmarked performance reports to facilitate quality improvement efforts. New for 2025 will be the development of long-term risk models and the online release of both short- and long-term risk calculators. A voluntary module to collect neoadjuvant targeted and immunotherapy data has been created and accepted by participants and is rapidly accruing data. STS GTSD participant public reporting has increased 50% over the last 2 years after the application of the U.S. News & World Report 3% transparency credit. All GTSD data analyses are now performed internally by the STS Research and Analytic Center, resulting in multiple publications through the Access & Publication, Task Force on Funded Research and Participant User File mechanisms. Future initiatives include the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into the STS GTSD, revision of the data collection form to incorporate variables associated with long-term outcomes, and focused efforts to increase the value of STS GTSD participation. This report delineates volume trends, recent initiatives, and the prolific research output emanating from the STS GTSD, reflecting a year of substantial progress and academic productivity.

Assessment of intercostal nerve block analgesia and local anesthetic infiltration for thoracoscopic pulmonary bullae resection: a comparative study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) and local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) on postoperative pain and recovery following thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae.

METHODS

A total of 160 patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary bullae resection were randomly assigned to receive either ICNB (n = 80) or LAI (n = 80). An experienced anesthesiologist administered ultrasound guided ICNB at the T4 and T7 levels with 5 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine hydrochloride for the ICNB group. Instead, the LAI group received 10 mL of the same concentration of ropivacaine hydrochloride at the same concentration used for ICNB for infiltration anesthesia at the incision sites. Out of the initial cohort, 146 patients completed the study (ICNB group, n = 71; LAI group, n = 75). The collected data included preoperative clinical characteristics, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain at various time points post-surgery (6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h). Additionally, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire was administered 24 h after surgery, and sleep quality was evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in drainage volume, use of additional analgesics, duration of chest tube placement, or hospital stay between the two groups. However, the ICNB group had significantly lower VAS scores and QoR-15 scores 24 h postoperatively (p < 0.05), indicating better pain management and recovery. The ICNB group also reported better sleep quality, as reflected by lower PSQI scores.

CONCLUSION

ICNB provides superior analgesia compared to LAI after thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary bullae, significantly improving postoperative recovery.

Perioperative Blood Transfusions and Cancer Progression: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the most recent evidence about known controversies on the effect of perioperative transfusion on cancer progression.

RECENT FINDINGS

Laboratory evidence suggests that transfusion-related immunomodulation can be modified by blood management and storage practices, but it is likely of less intensity than the effect of the surgical stress response. Clinical evidence has questioned the independent effect of blood transfusion on cancer progression for some cancers but supported it for others. Despite major changes in surgery and anesthesia, cancer surgery remains a major player in perioperative blood product utilization. Prospective data is still required to strengthen or refute existing associations. Transfusion-related immunomodulation in cancer surgery is well-documented, but the extent to which it affects cancer progression is unclear. Associations between transfusion and cancer progression are disease-specific. Increasing evidence shows autologous blood transfusion may be safe in cancer surgery.

Comparisons in analgesic effects between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and surgical intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of anesthesiologist-administrated erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and surgeon-administrated intercostal nerve block (ICNB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS).

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Operating room, postoperative recovery room and ward in two centers.

PATIENTS

One hundred patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for elective VATS.

INTERVENTIONS

The anesthesiologist-administrated ESPB under ultrasound guidance or surgeon-administrated ICNB under video-assisted thoracoscopy was randomly provided during VATS. Regular oral non-opioid analgesic combined with intravenous rescue morphine were prescribed for multimodal analgesia after surgery.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcomes were the pain score and morphine consumption during 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Morphine consumption at these time points was compared between the two study groups. Furthermore, oral weak opioid rescue analgesic was also provided at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative quality of recovery at 24 h was also assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, along with duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay were compared as secondary outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Patients in the two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, and surgical types were also similar. Postoperative VAS changes at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery were also comparable between the two study groups. Both groups had low median scores (<4.0) at all time points (all p > 0.05). Patients in the ESPB group required statistically non-significant higher 48-h morphine consumption [3 (0-6) vs. 0 (0-6) mg in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.135] and lower numbers of oral rescue analgesic (0.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8 in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.059). Additionally, patients in the two study groups had similar QoR15 scores and lengths of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Both anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided ESPB and surgeon-administered VATS ICNB were effective analgesic techniques for patients undergoing VATS for tumor resection.

Video-Assisted vs Robotic-Assisted Lung Lobectomies for Operating Room Resource Utilization and Patient Outcomes

Importance

With increased use of robots, there is an inadequate understanding of minimally invasive modalities' time costs. This study evaluates the operative durations of robotic-assisted vs video-assisted lung lobectomies.

Objective

To compare resource utilization, specifically operative time, between video-assisted and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lung lobectomies.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study evaluated patients aged 18 to 90 years who underwent minimally invasive (robotic-assisted or video-assisted) lung lobectomy from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022, with 90 days' follow-up after surgery. The study included multicenter electronic health record data from 21 hospitals within an integrated health care system in Northern California. Thoracic surgery was regionalized to 4 centers with 14 board-certified general thoracic surgeons.

Exposures

Robotic-assisted or video-assisted lung lobectomy.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was operative duration (cut to close) in minutes. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality. Comparisons between video-assisted and robotic-assisted lobectomies were generated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. The average treatment effects were estimated with augmented inverse probability treatment weighting (AIPTW). Patient and surgeon covariates were adjusted for and included patient demographics, comorbidities, and case complexity (age, sex, race and ethnicity, neighborhood deprivation index, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, nonelective hospitalizations, emergency department visits, a validated laboratory derangement score, a validated institutional comorbidity score, a surgeon-designated complexity indicator, and a procedural code count), and a primary surgeon-specific indicator.

Results

The study included 1088 patients (median age, 70.1 years [IQR, 63.3-75.8 years]; 704 [64.7%] female), of whom 446 (41.0%) underwent robotic-assisted and 642 (59.0%) underwent video-assisted lobectomy. The median unadjusted operative duration was 172.0 minutes (IQR, 128.0-226.0 minutes). After AIPTW, there was less than a 10% difference in all covariates between groups, and operative duration was a median 20.6 minutes (95% CI, 12.9-28.2 minutes; P < .001) longer for robotic-assisted compared with video-assisted lobectomies. There was no difference in adjusted secondary patient outcomes, specifically for length of stay (0.3 days; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.8 days; P = .11) or risk of 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.84-1.98; P = .13). The unadjusted 90-day mortality rate (1.3% [n = 14]) was too low for the AIPTW modeling process.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, there was no difference in patient outcomes between modalities, but operative duration was longer in robotic-assisted compared with video-assisted lung lobectomy. Given that this elevated operative duration is additive when applied systematically, increased consideration of appropriate patient selection for robotic-assisted lung lobectomy is needed to improve resource utilization.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2023 Update on Outcomes and Research

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD) continues its trajectory of growth and enhancement, solidifying its stature as a premier global thoracic surgical database. The past year witnessed a notable expansion with the inclusion of 10 additional participating sites, now totaling 287, augmenting the database's repository to more than 800,000 procedures. A significant stride was made in refining the data audit process, thereby elevating the accuracy and completeness metrics, a testament to the relentless pursuit of data integrity. The GTSD further broadened its research apparatus, with 15 scholarly publications, a 50% uptick from the preceding year. These publications underscore the database's instrumental role in advancing thoracic surgical knowledge. In a concerted effort to alleviate data entry exigencies, the GTSD Task Force also instituted streamlined data submission protocols, a move lauded by participant sites. This report delineates the recent advancements, volume trajectories, and outcome metrics and encapsulates the prolific research output emanating from the GTSD, reflecting a year of substantial progress and academic fecundity.

Robot-Assisted Left Lower Sleeve Lobectomy for Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma

Surgical resection with lung preservation is the treatment of choice for low-grade mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the tracheobronchial tree. This report describes a case of minimally invasive robot-assisted sleeve resection for tracheobronchial mucoepidermoid carcinoma and provides detailed instruction, with video demonstration, of the operative technique.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2022 Update on Outcomes and Research

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS GTSD) remains the largest and most robust thoracic surgical database in the world. Participating sites receive risk-adjusted performance reports for benchmarking and quality improvement initiatives. The GTSD also provides several mechanisms for high-quality clinical research using data from 274 participant sites and 781,000 procedures since its inception in 2002. Participant sites are audited at random annually for completeness and accuracy. Over the last year and a half, the GTSD Task Force continued to refine the data collection process, implementing an updated data collection form in July 2021, ensuring high data fidelity while minimizing data entry burden. In addition, the STS Workforce on National Databases has supported a robust GTSD-based research program, which led to eight scholarly publications in 2021. This report provides an update on volume trends, outcomes, and database initiatives as well as a summary of research productivity resulting from the GTSD over the preceding year.

Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy study: Outcomes and risk factors of conversion during minimally invasive lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

Conversion to thoracotomy continues to be a concern during minimally invasive lobectomy. The aim of this propensity-matched cohort study is to analyze the outcomes and risk factors of intraoperative conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic lobectomy (RL).

METHODS

Data from consecutive lobectomy cases performed for clinical stage IA to IIIA lung cancer was retrospectively collected from the Pulmonary Open, Robotic, and Thoracoscopic Lobectomy study consortium of 21 institutions from 2011 to 2019. The propensity-score method of inverse-probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the baseline characteristics across surgical approaches. Univariate logistic regression models were applied to test risk factors for conversion. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted using a stepwise model selection method.

RESULTS

Seven thousand two hundred sixteen patients undergoing lobectomy were identified: RL (n = 2968), VATS (n = 2831), and open lobectomy (n = 1417). RL had lower conversion rate compared with VATS (3.6% vs 12.9%; P < .0001). In the multivariable regression model, tumor size and neoadjuvant therapy were the most significant risk factors for conversion, followed by prior cardiac surgery, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, VATS approach, male gender, body mass index, and forced expiratory volume in 1 minute. Conversions for anatomical reasons were more common in VATS than RL (66.6% vs 45.6%; P = .0002); however, conversions for vascular reasons were more common in RL than VATS (24.8% vs 14%; P = .01). The rate of emergency conversions was comparable between RL and VATS (0.5% vs 0.7%; P = .25) with no intraoperative mortalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Converted minimally invasive lobectomies were not associated with worse perioperative mortality compared with open lobectomy. Compared with VATS lobectomy, RL is associated with a lower probability of conversion in this propensity-score matched cohort study.

Did conversion to thoracotomy during thoracoscopic lobectomy increase post-operative complications and prejudice survival? Results of best evidence topic analysis

The potential complications related to unplanned conversion to thoracotomy remains a major concern in thoracoscopic lobectomy and may limit the wide adoption of this strategy. We reviewed the literature from 1990 until February 2022, analyzing all papers comparing successful thoracoscopic lobectomy versus converted thoracoscopic lobectomy and/or upfront thoracotomy lobectomy to establish whether unplanned conversion negatively affected outcomes. Thirteen studies provided the most applicable evidence to evaluate this issue. Conversion to thoracotomy was reported to occur in up to 23% of cases (range, 5%-16%). Vascular injury, calcified lymph nodes, and dense adhesions were the most common reasons for conversion. Converted thoracoscopic lobectomy compared to successful thoracoscopic lobectomy was associated with longer operative time and hospital stay in all studies, with higher postoperative complication rates in seven studies, and with higher perioperative mortality rates in four studies. No significant differences were found between converted thoracoscopic lobectomy and upfront thoracotomy lobectomy. Five studies evaluated long-term survival, and in all papers conversion did not prejudice survival. Surgeons should not fear unplanned conversion during thoracoscopic lobectomy, but to avoid unexpected conversion that may negatively impact surgical outcome, a careful selection of patients is recommended-especially for frail patients.

Monocyte NLRP3-IL-1β Hyperactivation Mediates Neuronal and Synaptic Dysfunction in Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder

Perioperative neurocognitive disorder may develop in vulnerable patients following major operation. While neuroinflammation is linked to the cognitive effects of surgery, how surgery and immune signaling modulate neuronal circuits, leading to learning and memory impairment remains unknown. Using in vivo two-photon microscopy, Ca2+ activity and postsynaptic dendritic spines of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the primary motor cortex of a mouse model of thoracic surgery are imaged. It is found that surgery causes neuronal hypoactivity, impairments in learning-dependent dendritic spine formation, and deficits in multiple learning tasks. These neuronal and synaptic alterations in the cortex are mediated by peripheral monocytes through the NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent IL-1β production. Depleting peripheral monocytes or inactivating NLRP3 inflammasomes before surgery reduces levels of IL-1β and ameliorates neuronal and behavioral deficits in mice. Furthermore, adoptive transfer of IL-1β-producing myeloid cells from mice undertaking thoracic surgery is sufficient to induce neuronal and behavioral deficits in naïve mice. Together, these findings suggest that surgery leads to excessive NLRP3 activation in monocytes and elevated IL-1β signaling, which in turn causes neuronal hypoactivity and perioperative neurocognitive disorder.

Preoperative evaluation in thoracic surgery: limits of the patient's functional operability and consequence for perioperative anaesthesiologic management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Preoperative evaluation of older and more morbid patients in thoracic surgery is getting more advanced. In this context, early risk stratification has a crucial role for adequate informed decision-making, and thus for generating favourable effects of clinical outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings confirm that many risk factors impair mortality and morbidity beyond classical medical findings like results of lung function tests and values of the revised cardiac risk index. Especially results from holistic views on patients' functional status like frailty assessments are linked with long-term survival after lung resection.

SUMMARY

A comprehensive risk stratification by anaesthesiologists generates valuable guidance for the best strategy of clinical treatment. This includes preoperative, peri-operative and postoperative interventions, provided by interdisciplinary healthcare providers, resulting in an Early Risk Stratification and Strategy ('ERSAS') pathway.

Conversion to Thoracotomy During Thoracoscopic versus Robotic Lobectomy: Predictors and Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Conversion to thoracotomy during minimally invasive lobectomy for lung cancer is occasionally necessary. Differences between video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and robotic-assisted (RATS) lobectomy conversion have not been described.

METHODS

We queried The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD) from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. Patients with prior thoracic operations and metastatic disease were excluded. Univariable comparisons with Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests and multivariable logistic regression modeling were performed.

RESULTS

There were 27,695 minimally invasive lobectomies from 269 centers. Conversion to thoracotomy occurred in 11.0% of VATS and 6.0% of RATS (p<0.001). Conversion was associated with increased mortality (p<0.001), major complications (p<0.001), and intra- (p<0.001) and post-operative (p<0.001) blood transfusions. Conversion from RATS occurred emergently (p<0.001) and for vascular injury (p<0.001) more frequently than from VATS, but there was no difference in overall major complications or mortality. Mortality following conversion was 3.1% for RATS and 2.2% for VATS (p=0.24). Clinical cancer stage II or III (p<0.001), preoperative chemotherapy (p=0.003), FEV1 (p=0.006), BMI (p<0.001), and left-sided resection (p=0.0002) independently predicted VATS conversion. For RATS, clinical stage III (p=0.037), left-sided resection (0.041), and FEV1 (p=0.002) predicted conversion. Lower volume centers had increased rates of conversion (p<0.001) in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion from minimally invasive to open lobectomy is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Conversion occurs more frequently during VATS compared to RATS, although less often emergently, and with similar rates of overall mortality and major complication. Predictors, urgency, and reasons for conversion differ between RATS and VATS lobectomy and may assist in patient selection.

Impact of Chest Wall Resection on Mortality Following Lung Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer invading the chest wall is treated with concomitant en bloc lung and chest wall resection (CWR). It is unclear how CWR affects postoperative outcomes of lung resection. We hypothesized that CWR would be associated with increased risk of adverse outcomes after lung cancer resection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database from 2016-2019. Patients with superior sulcus tumors were excluded. Patient demographic and operative outcomes were compared between those with and without CWR. Chest wall resection was added to existing STS lung risk models to determine the association with a composite adverse outcome, which included major morbidity and death.

RESULTS

Among 41,310 lung resections, 306 (0.74%) occurred with concomitant CWR. Differences between those with and without CWR included demographic and comorbidities. Patients undergoing CWR were more likely to have the composite adverse outcome (64/306 (20.9%) vs 3128/41004 (7.6%) for non-CWR resections, p<0.001). Mortality was also increased among the CWR cohort (2.9% vs 1.1%, p=0.003). CWR was associated with an increased risk of adverse composite outcome amongst all lung resection patients in a multivariable model (OR 1.74, p=0.0003) and the lobectomy subgroup (OR 2.35, p<.0001). Among institutions with ≥10 lung resections, 49.1% performed lung resections with CWR.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant CWR adds risk of adverse outcomes after lung cancer resection. As a subset of intuitions perform CWR, quality assessments should control for CWR. This variable will be incorporated into the STS lung cancer and lobectomy quality composite measures.

Challenges in the Methodology for Health Disparities Research in Thoracic Surgery

Research on health disparities in thoracic surgery is based on large population-based studies, which is associated with certain biases. Several methodological challenges are associated with these biases and warrant review and attention. The lack of standardized definitions in health disparities research requires clarification for study design strategy. Further inconsistencies remain when considering data sources and collection methods. These inconsistencies pose challenges for accurate and standardized downstream data analysis and interpretation. These sources of bias should be considered when establishing the infrastructure of health disparities research in thoracic surgery, which is in its infancy and requires further development.

Assessment of Intercostal Nerve Block Analgesia for Thoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

The use of intercostal nerve block (ICNB) analgesia with local anesthesia is common in thoracic surgery. However, the benefits and safety of ICNB among adult patients undergoing surgery is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the analgesic benefits and safety of ICNB among adults undergoing thoracic surgery.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases using terms for ICNB and thoracic surgery (including thoracic surgery, thoracoscopy, thoracotomy, nerve block, intercostal nerves). The search and results were not limited by date, with the last search conducted on July 24, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Selected studies were experimental or observational and included adult patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery in which ICNB was administered with local anesthesia via single injection, continuous infusion, or a combination of both techniques in at least 1 group of patients. For comparison with ICNB, studies that examined systemic analgesia and different forms of regional analgesia (such as thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA], paravertebral block [PVB], and other techniques) were included. These criteria were applied independently by 2 authors, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. A total of 694 records were selected for screening.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data including patient characteristics, type of surgery, intervention analgesia, comparison analgesia, and primary and secondary outcomes were extracted independently by 3 authors. Synthesis was performed using a fixed-effects model.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The coprimary outcomes were postoperative pain intensity (measured as the worst static or dynamic pain using a validated 10-point scale, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating severe pain) and opioid consumption (measured in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs]) at prespecified intervals (0-6 hours, 7-24 hours, 25-48 hours, 49-72 hours, and >72 hours). Clinically relevant analgesia was defined as a 1-point or greater difference in pain intensity score at any interval. Secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications and pulmonary function.

RESULTS

Of 694 records screened, 608 were excluded based on prespecified exclusion criteria. The remaining 86 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, and 20 of those articles were excluded. All of the 66 remaining studies (5184 patients; mean [SD] age, 53.9 [10.2] years; approximately 59% men and 41% women) were included in the qualitative analysis, and 59 studies (3325 patients) that provided data for at least 1 outcome were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. Experimental studies had a high risk of bias in multiple domains, including allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, and blinding of outcome assessors. Marked differences (eg, crossover studies, timing of the intervention [intraoperative vs postoperative], blinding, and type of control group) were observed in the design and implementation of studies. The use of ICNB vs systemic analgesia was associated with lower static pain (0-6 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.40 points [95% CI, -1.46 to -1.33 points]; 7-24 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.27 points [95% CI, -1.40 to -1.13 points]) and lower dynamic pain (0-6 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.66 points [95% CI, -1.90 to -1.41 points]; 7-24 hours after surgery: mean score difference, -1.43 points [95% CI, -1.70 to -1.17 points]). Intercostal nerve block analgesia was noninferior to TEA (mean score difference in worst dynamic panic at 7-24 hours after surgery: 0.79 points; 95% CI, 0.28-1.29 points) and marginally inferior to PVB (mean score difference in worst dynamic pain at 7-24 hours after surgery: 1.29 points; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.41 points). The largest opioid-sparing effect of ICNB vs systemic analgesia occurred at 48 hours after surgery (mean difference, -10.97 MMEs; 95% CI, -12.92 to -9.02 MMEs). The use of ICNB was associated with higher MME values compared with TEA (eg, 48 hours after surgery: mean difference, 48.31 MMEs; 95% CI, 36.11-60.52 MMEs) and PVB (eg, 48 hours after surgery: mean difference, 3.87 MMEs; 95% CI, 2.59-5.15 MMEs).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, single-injection ICNB was associated with a reduction in pain during the first 24 hours after thoracic surgery and was clinically noninferior to TEA or PVB. Intercostal nerve block analgesia had opioid-sparing effects; however, TEA and PVB were associated with larger decreases in postoperative MMEs, suggesting that ICNB may be most beneficial for cases in which TEA and PVB are not indicated.

Surgeon experience is associated with prolonged air leak after robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Prolonged air leak (>5 days) following robotic-assisted pulmonary lobectomy is a significant complication. This study aimed to determine patient and surgeon factors that can predict prolonged air leak (PAL) after robotic lobectomy for lung cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review from a single-center experience of robotic-assisted lobectomy for lung cancer. Perioperative variables including surgeon case experience, patient demographics, DLCO, FEV1, BMI, and smoking status were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 305 robotic-assisted lobectomies performed by four surgeons met inclusion criteria from June 2016 to February 2019. Thirty-day post-operative mortality was 1.2%. 27 out of 305 (8.8%) patients developed PAL. We grouped surgeon robotic experience by 10 case increments. When adjusted for age and gender, the odds for PAL decreased by 15% for every 10 robotic lobectomies our surgeons performed (OR=0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.99, p=0.0384). Logistic regression models showed a linear transition curve was at the 50^th case. Female gender (OR=2.62, 95% CI: 1.03-6.69, p=0.0314) and younger age (OR=0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.91, p=0.0184) were statistically significant risk factors for PAL. Cumulative sum analysis similarly showed strong association between experience and PAL. Preoperative DLCO, FEV1, BMI, and smoking status were not statistically significant predictive factors.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that surgeon robotic case experience is associated with the rate of postoperative PAL - as the number of robotic lobectomies increases, the rate of PAL significantly decreases. It is imperative to emphasize a learning curve exists for this approach that directly impacts patient outcomes.

Early Discharge after Lobectomy for Lung Cancer does not Equate to Early Readmission

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in several specialties reduce length of stay, but accelerated discharge after thoracic surgery is not well characterized. This study tested the hypothesis that patients discharged on post-operative day 1 (POD1) after lobectomy for lung cancer have an increased risk of readmission.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a lobectomy for lung cancer between 2011-2019 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. Readmission rates were compared between patients discharged on postoperative day 1 (POD1) and patients discharged POD 2-6. Early discharge and readmission predictors were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Only 854 (3.8%) of 22,585 patients that met inclusion criteria were discharged on POD1, though POD1 discharge rates increased from 2.3% to 8.1% (p< 0.001) from 2011 to 2019. Median hospitalization for POD2-6 patients was 4 days (IQR: 3-5). Patient characteristics associated with a lower likelihood of POD1 discharge were increasing age, smokers, or history of dyspnea, while a minimally invasive approach was the strongest predictor of early discharge (AOR 5.42, p<0.001). Readmission rates were not significantly different for POD1 and POD2-6 groups in univariate analysis (6.0% vs 7.0%, p=0.269). Further, POD1 discharge was not a risk factor for readmission in multivariable analysis (AOR 1.10, p=0.537).

CONCLUSIONS

Select patients can be discharged on POD1 after lobectomy for lung cancer without an increased readmission risk, supporting this accelerated discharge target inclusion in lobectomy ERAS protocols.

Robotic-Assisted Complex Pulmonary Resection: Sleeve Lobectomy for Cancer

The use of robotic assistance for complex pulmonary resections such as segmentectomy and sleeve lobectomy has steadily increased in recent years. These operations are technically challenging as they require fine dissection and suturing, which is often difficult to perform using traditional minimally invasive techniques. Robotic surgery is well-suited for complex pulmonary surgery given its specific advantages related to superior optics and precise tissue manipulation and dissection. Herein we describe our technique for robotic-assisted complex pulmonary surgery with a specific focus on right upper sleeve lobectomy for cancer, including associated video case demonstration. The principles discussed are generalizable to other complex lung and tracheobronchial operations and highlight the benefits of the robotic platform.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine/Epinephrine Intercostal Nerve Block as Part of an Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) Care Pathway for Robotic Thoracic Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To examine how postoperative pain control after robotic thoracoscopic surgery varies with liposomal bupivacaine (LipoB) versus 0.5% bupivacaine/1:200,000 epinephrine (Bupi/Epi) intercostal nerve blocks within the context of an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS) protocol.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing robotic thoracoscopic procedures between September 1, 2018 and October 31, 2019 was conducted.

SETTING

University of Miami, single-institutional.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Two hundred fifty-two patients had either LipoB intercostal nerve blocks (n = 129) or Bupi/Epi intercostal nerve blocks (n = 123) when undergoing robotic thoracic surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Comparative analysis of patient-reported pain levels, in-hospital and post-discharge opioid requirements, 90-day operative complications, length of hospital stay, and hospital costs was performed. Data were stratified to either anatomic lung resection or pulmonary wedge resection/mediastinal-pleural procedures. Bupi/Epi patients reported significantly more acute postoperative pain than LipoB patients, which correlated with higher in-hospital and post-discharge opioid requirements. There were no differences in postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, or hospital costs between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

As part of an ERATS protocol, infiltration of intercostal spaces and surgical wounds with LipoB for robotic thoracoscopic procedures afforded better postoperative subjective pain control and decreased opioid requirements without an increase in hospital costs as compared with use of Bupi/Epi.