Three-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Advantages of Totally Stapled Collard Over Circular Stapled Technique for Cervical Esophagectomy Anastomosis

BACKGROUND

The quality of life between the totally stapled Collard (TSC) and circular stapled (CS) techniques from the patient's perspective has not been assessed. This longitudinal patient-reported outcome and objective data assessment study aimed to compare the effects of TSC vs CS for cervical anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) on the quality of life.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study included patients with esophageal cancer who underwent MIE and cervical anastomosis between April 2019 and February 2021; of whom, 105 and 216 patients received TSC and CS anastomosis, respectively. The objective metrics were evaluated based on postoperative complications. Patient-reported outcomes instruments using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer modules were assessed preoperatively. The Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) Core 30 and the QLQ-Oesophagus Module 18 assessed the quality of life. Mixed-effects models examined changes in questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

The stenosis rate in the TSC group was significantly lower than that in the CS group. There were no significant differences in other postoperative complications between the groups. In the QLQ Core 30 scale, the TSC group had better emotional function, less fatigue, less appetite loss, and better function than the CS group, with significant differences in different time points between the groups. QLQ-Oesophagus Module 18 revealed that the TSC group had significantly less appetite loss, dysphagia, dry mouth, pain, and obstruction, and better eating and speech than the CS group.

CONCLUSIONS

TSC has significant advantages over the CS technique in lowering postoperative symptom burden and improving quality of life for cervical anastomosis on patient-reported outcomes.

Three-Field Versus Two-Field Lymphadenectomy in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: 3-Year Survival Outcomes of a Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been used widely for the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy for esophagectomy in MIE remains unclear. This trial aimed to investigate the 3-year survival and recurrence outcomes in a randomized controlled trial comparing MIE with either three-field lymphadenectomy (3-FL) or two-field lymphadenectomy (2-FL).

METHODS

Between June 2016 and May 2019, 76 patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer were enrolled in a single-center randomized controlled trial and randomly assigned to MIE that included either 3-FL or 2-FL at a 1:1 ratio (n = 38 patients each). The survival outcomes and recurrence patterns were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The 3-year cumulative overall survival (OS) probability was 68.2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 52.72-83.68 %) for the 3-FL group and 68.6 % (95 % CI, 53.12-84.08 %) for the 2-FL group. The 3-year cumulative probability of disease-free survival (DFS) was 66.3 % (95 % CI, 50.03-82.57 %) for the 3-FL group and 67.1 % (95 % CI, 51.03-83.17 %) for the 2-FL group.. The OS and DFS differences in the two groups were comparable. The overall recurrence rate did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.737). The incidence of cervical lymphatic recurrence in the 2-FL group was higher than in the 3-FL group (P = 0.051).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with 2-FL in MIE, 3-FL tended to prevent cervical lymphatic recurrence. However, it was not found to add survival benefit for the patients with thoracic esophageal cancer.

Ten-Year Survival and Recurrence Patterns After Three-Field Lymph Node Dissection for Squamous Cell and Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to determine the prevalence of metastases to the cervical and recurrent laryngeal cervicothoracic (CT) nodes as well as survival and recurrence patterns after esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection (TFD) in patients with predominately adenocarcinoma (AC) of the esophagus.

BACKGROUND

Although esophagectomy with TFD is commonly practiced in Japan and Southeast Asia for squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the esophagus, there are only a handful of reports about its' utilization and survival benefit in North American patients.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of patients who had an esophagectomy with TFD. The primary outcomes of interest were the prevalence of nodal metastases to the CT nodes as well as overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included time to recurrence, recurrence patterns, operative morbidity as well as 30 and 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Two hundred forty-two patients with esophageal cancer (AC: 67%) underwent esophagectomy with TFD. Metastases to the CT nodes were present in 56 patients (23%: AC 20% and SCC 30%). Positive CT nodes were present in 14% of pT1/T2 tumors and 30% of pT3 tumors. For the 56 patients with CT positive nodes, 5-year OS was 25% (AC:16%; SCC:39%). Fifteen of 56 (26.7%) patients with metastases to the CT nodes were alive and disease-free at a minimum of 5 years postoperatively. Ten-year OS was 43% for all patients with SCC and 28% for patients with AC.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastases to the CT nodes are common in both SCC and AC of the esophagus and may be present in at least 14% of early lesions. Five-year survival is encouraging particularly for patients with esophageal SCC cancer.

Safety and Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE) with Three-Field Lymphadenectomy and Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Resectable Esophageal Cancer and Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis

BACKGROUND

In the West, patients with cervical lymph node metastasis of resectable esophageal cancer at diagnosis are generally precluded from curative treatment. This study prospectively explored the safety and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with three-field lymphadenectomy for these patients.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2021, patients with resectable thoracic esophageal cancer and cervical lymph node metastasis were recruited nationwide in the Netherlands. Patients without interval metastasis following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and good physical condition underwent RAMIE with bilateral three-field lymphadenectomy. Safety was predefined as ≤50% Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3b postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was administered to 29 patients (19 (66%) adenocarcinoma and 10 (34%) squamous cell carcinoma). After restaging, nine (31%) patients were excluded (interval metastasis, clinical deterioration, or withdrawn consent). RAMIE was performed in 20 patients (R0-rate 95%). A median of 42 [range 21-71] lymph nodes were resected of which 13 [range 2-35] were cervical. Only 1 (5%) patient had an unexpected contralateral cervical lymph node metastasis. Complications grade ≥3b occurred in 50%. Most frequent complications of any grade were recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (45%) and pneumonia (40%). Overall survival at 1 year was 85% and quality of life at 6 months was comparable to esophageal cancer patients treated with curative intent.

CONCLUSIONS

RAMIE with three-field lymphadenectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for patients with resectable esophageal cancer presenting with cervical lymph node metastasis is feasible in a Western population. Because contralateral cervical metastasis is rare, a unilateral neck dissection would suffice in the majority of cases.

CLINICAL TRIAL

gov Identifier: NCT02426879. Dutch trial register Identifier: NTR 4552.