Bleeding and Thrombotic Events During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Postcardiotomy Shock

Cannula-Associated Deep Vein Thrombosis Following Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Decannulation: Incidence and Risk Factors

Thrombotic complications during and after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are commonly observed clinically. The incidences of cannula-associated deep vein thrombosis (CaDVT) post-ECMO support have predominantly focused on Caucasian demographics. This study aims to determine the incidence and risk factors for CaDVT in Vietnamese patients following ECMO decannulation. The retrospective study from January 2019 to February 2020 observed ECMO weaning patients and screened for CaDVT using Doppler ultrasonography. Data were collected on patient demographics, ECMO parameters, and transfusion and coagulation profiles during ECMO support. Of the 82 patients successfully weaned ECMO, 89% were assessed for CaDVT. We observed a CaDVT incidence of 24.7%, and only one patient (5.6%) had a pulmonary embolism in the CaDVT group. Noteworthy is that the anticoagulation goals, transfusion during ECMO, and hospital mortality showed no significant difference between the CaDVT and non-CaDVT groups. The findings showed that the duration of ECMO support is a risk factor for CaDVT. The incidence of CaDVT following ECMO decannulation was 24.7%, and the diagnosis of CaDVT can be underestimated. Therefore, we suggest routine screening for CaDVT after cannula removal.

Anticoagulation and associated complications in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To describe the incidence of bleeding and thrombotic complications in VA-ECMO according to anticoagulation strategy.

Design

This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting bleeding and thrombotic complications in VA-ECMO. The incidence of primary outcomes according to anticoagulation drug and monitoring test was described.

Data sources

CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL (2010-January 2024).

Review methods

Data was extracted using Covidence. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed using STATA MP v18.1 metaprop.

Results

We included 159 studies with 21,942 patients. No studies were at low risk of bias. The incidence of major bleeding or thrombotic events was similar among heparin-, bivalirudin- and anticoagulation-free cohorts. The pooled incidence of major bleeding and thrombotic complications were 40% (95%CI 36-44, I2 = 97.12) and 17% (95%CI 14-19, I 2  = 92.60%), respectively. The most common bleeding site was thoracic. The most common ischaemic complication was limb ischaemia. The incidences of major bleeding or thrombotic events, intracranial haemorrhage and ischaemic stroke were similar among all monitoring tests. Mechanical unloading was associated with a high incidence of major bleeding events (60%, 95%CI 43-77, I2 = 93.32), and ischaemic strokes (13%, 95%CI 7-19, I2 = 81.80).

Conclusions

Available literature assessing the association between anticoagulation strategies in VA-ECMO, and bleeding and thrombosis is of limited quality. We identified a substantially higher incidence of major bleeding events than a previous meta-analysis. Limited numbers of patients anticoagulated with alternatives to heparin were reported. Patients with additional mechanical LV unloading represent a cohort at particular risk of bleeding and thrombotic complications.

Mortality on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Evaluation of independent risk factors and causes of death during venoarterial and venovenous support

INTRODUCTION

Most patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decease during therapy on the system. However, the actual causes of death have not been studied sufficiently. This study analyses the etiology, prevalence, and risk factors for the outcome variable death during ongoing ECMO for all patients and divided according to venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) support.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed all patients receiving ECMO support at our institution between March 2006 to January 2021. Only the patients deceased during ongoing support were included.

RESULTS

2016 patients were placed on VA (n = 1168; 58%) or VV (n = 848; 42%) ECMO; 759 patients (37.7%) deceased on support. The causes of death differed between the support types: VA ECMO patients mostly died from cerebral ischemia (34%), low-cardiac output (LCO; 24.1%) and multi-organ failure (MOF; 21.6%), whereas in VV ECMO cases, refractory respiratory failure (28.2%), and sepsis (20.4%) dominated. Multivariate regression analysis revealed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and acidosis prior to ECMO as risk factors for dying on VA ECMO, while high inotropic doses pre-ECMO, a high fraction of inspired oxygen on day 1, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and international normalized ratio levels lead to an unfavourable outcome in VV ECMO patients.

CONCLUSION

Even in highly experienced centers, ECMO mortality remains high and occurs mainly on support or 24 h after its termination. The causes of death differ between VV and VA ECMO, depending on the underlying diseases responsible for the need of extracorporeal support.

Peripheral-to-central extracorporeal corporeal membrane oxygenation switch in refractory cardiogenic shock patients: outcomes and bridging strategies

BACKGROUND

Peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pECMO) has become the first-line device in refractory cardiogenic shock (rCS). Some pECMO complications can preclude any bridging strategies and a peripheral-to-central ECMO (cECMO) switch can be considered as a bridge-to-decision. We conducted this study to appraise the in-hospital survival and the bridging strategies in patients undergoing peripheral-to-central ECMO switch.

METHODS

This retrospective monocenter study included patients admitted to a ECMO-dedicated intensive care unit from February 2006 to January 2023. Patients with rCS requiring pECMO switched to cECMO were included. Patients were not included when the cECMO was the first mechanical circulatory support.

RESULTS

Eighty patients, with a median [IQR25-75] age of 44 [29-53] years at admission and a female-to-male sex ratio of 0.6 were included in the study. Refractory pulmonary edema was the main switching reason. Thirty patients (38%) were successfully bridged to: heart transplantation (n = 16/80, 20%), recovery (n = 10/80, 12%) and ventricle assist device (VAD, n = 4/30, 5%) while the others died on cECMO (n = 50/80, 62%). The most frequent complications were the need for renal replacement therapy (76%), hemothorax or tamponade (48%), need for surgical revision (34%), mediastinitis (28%), and stroke (28%). The in-hospital and one-year survival rates were 31% and 27% respectively. Myocardial infarction as the cause of the rCS was the only variable independently associated with in-hospital mortality (HR 2.5 [1.3-4.9], p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The switch from a failing pECMO support to a cECMO as a bridge-to-decision is a possible strategy for a very selected population of young patients with a realistic chance of heart function recovery or heart transplantation. In this setting, cECMO allows patients triage preventing from wasting expensive and limited resources.

Efficacy of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with and without intra-aortic balloon pump in adult cardiogenic shock

Introduction

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is sometimes coupled with Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) to treat patients with cardiogenic shock. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the association of the IABP approach on survival and vascular complication rates in adults with cardiogenic shock undergoing VA-ECMO.

Methods

We performed a systematic search of original studies on VA-ECMO with and without IABP in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library.

Results

A total of 42 studies with 8,759 patients were included. The pooled in-hospital deaths of patients on VA-ECMO with and without IABP were 2,962/4,807 (61.61%) versus 2,666/3,952 (67.45%). VA-ECMO with IABP presents lower in-hospital mortality (risk ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.91; P < 0.00001). In addition, IABP was associated with lower in-hospital mortality of patients with postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and ischaemic heart disease. (risk ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98; P = 0.01; risk ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.82-0.89; P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in in-hospital morbidity in neurological, gastrointestinal, limb-related, bleeding, and infection complications between patients on VA-ECMO with and without IABP.

Discussion

In these observational studies, concomitant use of IABP and VA-ECMO in adult patients with cardiogenic shock was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO [CRD42017069259].

Cardiac Tamponade Complicating Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Cardiac tamponade is a potentially life-threatening complication during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). In this study, the authors assessed the incidence, patient characteristics, and risk factors for mortality of cardiac tamponade during ECMO.

DESIGN

The authors queried the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry from 1997 to 2021 for all adults with cardiac tamponade as a reported complication during ECMO.

PARTICIPANTS

Cardiac tamponade was reported in 2,176 (64% men; 53.8 ± 0.33 years) of 84,430 adults (2.6%).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Venoarterial ECMO was the main configuration (78%), followed by venovenous ECMO (VV ECMO) (18%), for cardiac (67%), pulmonary (21%) support, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (12%). Percutaneous cannulation was performed in 51%, with the femoral vein and femoral artery as the most common sites for drainage and return cannulae, with dual-lumen cannulae in 39% of VV ECMO. Hospital survival was lower (35% v 49%; p < 0.01) when compared with that of all adults from the ELSO Registry. In multivariate analysis, age, aortic dissection and/or rupture, COVID-19, ECPR, pre-ECMO renal-replacement therapy, and prone position are associated with hospital mortality, whereas ECMO for pulmonary support is associated with hospital survival. Similarly, renal, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurologic, and pulmonary complications occurred more frequently in nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac tamponade is a rare complication during ECMO that, despite being potentially reversible, is associated with high hospital mortality. Venoarterial ECMO is the most common configuration. ECMO for pulmonary support was associated with higher survival, and ECPR was associated with higher mortality. In these patients, other ECMO-related complications were frequently reported and associated with hospital mortality.

Assessing Venous Thrombotic Risks in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Supported Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This study investigates the prevalence and risk factors associated with venous thrombotic events in patients receiving (ECMO) support. Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest databases from inception through November 25, 2023.Case-control and cohort studies focusing on the prevalence and risk factors for venous thrombotic events in patients supported by ECMO. Identification of risk factors and calculation of incidence rates. Nineteen studies encompassing 10,767 participants were identified and included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of venous thrombotic events among patients receiving ECMO support was 48% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.60, I2 = 97.18%]. Factors associated with increased incidence rates included longer duration of ECMO support (odds ratio [OR] 1.08, 95% CI 1.07-1.09, I2 = 49%), abnormal anti-coagulation monitoring indicators (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04, I2 = 84%), and type of ECMO cannulation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.14-3.34, I2 = 64%). The pooled prevalence of venous thrombotic events in patients with ECMO support is high. Increased risk is associated with extended duration of ECMO support, abnormal anti-coagulation monitoring, and specific types of ECMO cannulation.

aPTT-guided anticoagulation monitoring during ECMO support: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The initiation of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with complex coagulatory and inflammatory processes and consequently needed anticoagulation. Systemic anticoagulation bears an additional risk of serious bleeding, and its monitoring is of immense importance. Therefore, our work aims to analyze the association of anticoagulation monitoring with bleeding during ECMO support.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Systematic literature review and meta-analysis, complying with the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO-CRD42022359465).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies comprising 3249 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients experiencing hemorrhage had a longer activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), a longer ECMO duration, and higher mortality. We could not find strong evidence of any aPTT threshold association with the bleeding occurrence, as less than half of authors reported a potential relationship. Finally, we identified the acute kidney injury (66%, 233/356) and hemorrhage (46%, 469/1046) to be the most frequent adverse events, while almost one-half of patients did not survive to discharge (47%, 1192/2490).

CONCLUSION

The aPTT-guided anticoagulation is still the standard of care in ECMO patients. We did not find strong evidence supporting the aPTT-guided monitoring during ECMO. Based on the weight of the available evidence, further randomized trials are crucial to clarify the best monitoring strategy.

Association of aPTT-Guided Anticoagulation Monitoring with Thromboembolic Events in Patients Receiving V-A ECMO Support: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with complex inflammatory and coagulatory processes, raising the need for systemic anticoagulation. The balance of anticoagulatory and procoagulant factors is essential, as therapeutic anticoagulation confers a further risk of potentially life-threatening bleeding. Therefore, our study aims to systematize and analyze the most recent evidence regarding anticoagulation monitoring and the thromboembolic events in patients receiving veno-arterial ECMO support.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched the Scopus and PubMed databases up to October 2022. A weighted effects model was employed for the meta-analytic portion of the study.

RESULTS

Six studies comprising 1728 patients were included in the final analysis. Unfractionated heparin was used for anticoagulation, with an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) monitoring goal set between 45 and 80 s. The majority of studies aimed to investigate the incidence of adverse events and potential risk factors for thromboembolic and bleeding events. None of the authors found any association of aPTT levels with the occurrence of thromboembolic events. Finally, the most frequent adverse events were hemorrhage (pooled 43%, 95% CI 28.4; 59.5) and any kind of thrombosis (pooled 36%, 95% CI 21.7; 53.7), and more than one-half of patients did not survive to discharge (pooled 54%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the tremendous development of critical care, aPTT-guided systemic anticoagulation is still the standard monitoring tool. We did not find any association of aPTT levels with thrombosis. Further evidence and new trials should clarify the true incidence of thromboembolic events, along with the best anticoagulation and monitoring strategy in veno-arterial ECMO patients.

Bleeding and thrombotic events in patients with severe COVID-19 supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a nationwide cohort study

PURPOSE

To describe bleeding and thrombotic events and their risk factors in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and to evaluate their impact on in-hospital mortality.

METHODS

The ECMOSARS registry included COVID-19 patients supported by ECMO in France. We analyzed all patients included up to March 31, 2022 without missing data regarding bleeding and thrombotic events. The association of bleeding and thrombotic events with in-hospital mortality and pre-ECMO variables was assessed using multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among 620 patients supported by ECMO, 29% had only bleeding events, 16% only thrombotic events and 20% both bleeding and thrombosis. Cannulation site (18% of patients), ear nose and throat (12%), pulmonary bleeding (9%) and intracranial hemorrhage (8%) were the most frequent bleeding types. Device-related thrombosis and pulmonary embolism/thrombosis accounted for most of thrombotic events. In-hospital mortality was 55.7%. Bleeding events were associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) = 2.91[1.94-4.4]) but not thrombotic events (adjOR = 1.02[0.68-1.53]). Intracranial hemorrhage was strongly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjOR = 13.5[4.4-41.5]). Ventilation duration before ECMO ≥ 7 days and length of ECMO support were associated with bleeding. Thrombosis-associated factors were fibrinogen ≥ 6 g/L and length of ECMO support.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nationwide cohort of COVID-19 patients supported by ECMO, bleeding incidence was high and associated with mortality. Intracranial hemorrhage incidence was higher than reported for non-COVID patients and carried the highest risk of death. Thrombotic events were less frequent and not associated with mortality. Length of ECMO support was associated with a higher risk of both bleeding and thrombosis, supporting the development of strategies to minimize ECMO duration.