Aortic valve neocuspidisation using xenologous pericardium versus bioprosthetic valve replacement

The utility of neocuspidization in the surgical management of congenital aortic valve pathology: mid-term results of single-center experience with AVNeo procedure in children

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve (AV) pathology in children presents a significant surgical challenge, with mid- and long-term outcomes of current techniques remaining controversial. This study evaluates our experience with aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) in the pediatric population, analyzing immediate and mid-term results.

METHODS

Ten children underwent AVNeo between June 2017 and August 2019. The clinical data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcomes included failure to perform AVNeo, intraoperative conversion to the alternative technique, in-hospital mortality, and major adverse events. The secondary outcomes included aortic stenosis or regurgitation, valve-related events, reoperations, and mortality during follow-up.

RESULTS

The median age was 9 (range: 2-17) years. AVNeo was feasible in all cases. Five children underwent previous cardiac interventions. Neocuspidization was feasible in all cases. No in-hospital mortality or significant postoperative complications occurred. Before discharge, average peak and mean pressure gradients were 13.5 mmHg and 6.5 mmHg, respectively. Aortic insufficiency was grade 0 or 1 in all cases. Seven patients required reoperation for valve dysfunction over a median follow-up of 73 months. The median time to reoperation was 62 months, with six patients undergoing mechanical valve replacement and one receiving a Ross procedure.

CONCLUSION

AVNeo offers excellent hemodynamic outcomes for children with AV pathology in the immediate postoperative period. However, the mid-term results revealed significant valve degeneration, necessitating reoperations in most cases. Unlike in adults, we do not consider AVNeo a definitive solution in children with AV disease. We see this technique as a valuable tool in the staged management of this congenital heart pathology.

Complete Aortic Valve Reconstruction with Autologous Pericardium: Analysis of Mid-Term Results of Single-Center Experience with AVNeo Procedure

PURPOSE

Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) is a relatively recent advancement in surgical AV replacement. Data on its performance beyond the short term are limited. We assessed the mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing AVNeo, focusing on feasibility, perioperative details, and its role in AV pathology treatment.

METHODS

Sixty-five consecutive patients underwent AVNeo between December 2016 and February 2018. Clinical data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Tricuspid reconstruction with autologous pericardium was performed in all cases. Echocardiographic follow-up was conducted post-discharge, at 6 and 12 months, and annually thereafter.

RESULTS

The mean age was 62.6 ± 18.7 years. AVNeo was feasible in all cases. Concomitant procedures were performed in 43 (66.2%) patients. Mean bypass and cross-clamp times were 119.2 ± 30.3 and 87.1 ± 22.9 minutes, respectively. Postoperative transvalvular hemodynamics was excellent. There was one (1.5%) in-hospital death. Follow-up (mean 66.72 ± 12.77 months) was complete in 58 patients (89.2%). There were no detected valve-related or thromboembolic events. Transvalvular hemodynamic parameters were stable during the observation period: peak pressure gradient at discharge and follow-up was 15.3 ± 4.6 mmHg and 15.01 ± 6.3 mmHg, respectively (ρ = 0.346).

CONCLUSIONS

AVNeo demonstrated the feasibility and favorable mid-term outcomes. Studies with longer-term observation are warranted to evaluate its durability.

Single center two years' experience of Ozaki procedure: Early follow-up

The Ozaki Procedure is an innovative surgical technique aiming of aortic valve neocuspidization using glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium was first developed by Ozaki et al in 2007. With this newly developed technique, valve replacement was achieved without using prosthetic material due to both aortic stenosis and aortic insufficiency. Between December 2020 and December 2022, a total of 59 patients were operated on with the Ozaki Procedure due to aortic valve pathologies in our center. We evaluated the pre- and postoperative as well as the first-month data of a total of 44 patients with isolated the Ozaki Procedure and compared their echocardiographic changes. Patients with isolated aortic valve pathology were included in the study. Fifteen patients who underwent simultaneous coronary artery bypass surgery and Ozaki Procedure were excluded from the analysis. In the first month after the operation, n:2 (%4.5) patients died. When the preoperative and postoperative 1st month echocardiographic data of the remaining patients were compared, it was found that the decrease in mean gradient, max gradient and peak velocity values in the aortic valve was statistically significant. This is due to the fact that reaching neo-valves has very similar hemodynamics to the native aortic valve. Aortic valve neocuspidization by Ozaki Procedure may be a viable alternative to both surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Its popularity and application is increasing all over the world. Short and mid-term results are available in the literature. The short and mid-term results are good, and the long-term results are hopeful.

Aortic valve neocuspidization using the Ozaki technique: A meta-analysis of reconstructed patient-level data

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve neocuspidization using the Ozaki technique has shown promising results both in adults and children.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed up to November 13, 2021. Individual patient data were reconstructed and analyzed from the Kaplan-Meier curves of all eligible studies for time-to-event outcomes.

RESULTS

We included a total of 22 studies reporting on 1,891 patients that underwent Ozaki reconstruction. Mean age at the time of surgery was 43.2 ± 24.5 years (65 ± 12.3 years for adult patients and 12.3 ± 3.8 years for pediatric patients). The most common indication was aortic stenosis (46.4%, 95% CI 34.1-58.6). Mean cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass duration were 106.8 ± 24.8 minutes and 135.2 ± 35.1 minutes, respectively. Permanent pacemaker was implanted in 0.7% (95% CI 0.4-1.2) of the patients. At discharge, mean effective orifice area was 2.1 ± 0.5 cm²/m². At latest follow-up, peak gradient was 15.7 ± 7.4 mm Hg and only 0.25% (95% CI 0-2.3) had moderate aortic insufficiency. In-hospital mortality was 0.7% (95% CI 0.1-1.7). Late mortality was 1.9% during a mean follow-up of 38.1 ± 23.8 months. One-year, 3-year, and 5-year freedom from reoperation rates were 98.0 %, 97.0 % and 96.5%, respectively. More than half of the reoperations were due to infective endocarditis (51.5%, 95% CI 18.3-84.0). In our cohort, the risk of endocarditis per patient per year was 0.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The midterm outcomes of the Ozaki procedure are excellent in terms of hemodynamics, survival, and freedom from reoperation. Acquiring long-term follow-up will help solidify this technique in the cardiac surgery armamentarium.

Aortic valve neocuspidization and its technical nuance

Aortic valve neocuspidization or Ozaki procedure represents an advanced surgical strategy for the management of patients with aortic valvulopathy. It has been shown to have clinical and hemodynamic outcomes that compare favorably with aortic valve replacement as it restores physiological aortic valve function and left ventricular remodeling. There are, however, a new set of issues including structural valve deterioration, leaflet tear/perforation, and need for reoperation. A keen understanding of the technical nuances involved with the Ozaki procedure may help in reducing the incidence of such adverse outcomes.